Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Transl Med. 2024 Jun 26;16(753):eadj1597. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adj1597

MEK-SHP2 inhibition prevents tibial pseudarthrosis caused by NF1 loss in Schwann cells and skeletal stem/progenitor cells

Simon Perrin 1, Sanela Protic 1, Vincent Bretegnier 1, Ingrid Laurendeau 2, Oriane Duchamp de Lageneste 1, Nicolas Panara 2, Odile Ruckebusch 3, Marine Luka 4,5, Cécile Masson 6,7, Théodora Maillard 8, Fanny Coulpier 1, Stéphanie Pannier 9, Philippe Wicart 9, Smail Hadj-Rabia 10, Katarzyna J Radomska 1, Mohammed Zarhrate 7,11, Mickael Ménager 4,5, Dominique Vidaud 2,8, Piotr Topilko 1, Béatrice Parfait 2,8, Céline Colnot 1,*
PMCID: PMC12093263  NIHMSID: NIHMS2013236  PMID: 38924432

Abstract

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is a severe pathology marked by spontaneous bone fractures that fail to heal leading to fibrous nonunion. Half of patients with CPT are affected by the multisystemic genetic disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), caused by mutations in the NF1 tumor suppressor gene, a negative regulator of RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. Here, we analyzed patients with CPT and Prss56-Nf1 knockout mice to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms of CPT-related fibrous nonunion and explored a pharmacological approach to treat CPT. We identified NF1-deficient Schwann cells and skeletal stem/progenitor cells (SSPCs) in pathological periosteum as affected cell types driving fibrosis. Whereas NF1-deficient SSPCs adopted a fibrotic fate, NF1-deficient Schwann cells produced critical paracrine factors including transforming growth factor-β and induced fibrotic differentiation of wild-type SSPCs. To counteract the elevated RAS-MAPK signaling in NF1-deficient Schwann cells and SSPCs, we used combined MAPK kinase (MEK) and Src homology 2 containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2) inhibitors. Combined MEK-SHP2 inhibition in vivo prevented fibrous nonunion in the Prss56-Nf1 knockout mouse model, providing a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of fibrous nonunion in CPT.

One Sentence Summary

Combined MEK-SHP2 inhibition prevents fibrotic failure to heal in a preclinical model of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia.

Introduction

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is a rare but severe pathology that manifests mostly in children prior to 2 years of age. Patients with CPT present with tibial bowing at birth leading to spontaneous fracture and failure to heal due to fibrous nonunion. CPT treatment is exclusively surgical and remains highly challenging, with substantial risk of re-fracture or amputation (1, 2). Pharmacological treatments are needed to improve CPT management, but the pathogenic mechanisms remain poorly understood and a relevant pre-clinical model for CPT is lacking. CPT can be classified as isolated CPT of unknown etiology, or NF1-related CPT in patients diagnosed with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). NF1 is one of the most common multisystemic genetic disorders that affects 1 in 3000 individuals. Patients with NF1 can exhibit a variety of symptoms, including benign nerve sheath tumors, called cutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas (NFBs), skin hyperpigmentation (Café-au-lait macules, CALMs), learning disabilities, and bone manifestations (3). NF1 is caused by heterozygous mutations in the NF1 gene encoding the tumor-suppressor neurofibromin, a negative regulator of RAS and the MAPK pathway. The diverse NF1 symptoms result from a second somatic mutational event in specific tissues and cell types. NFBs and CALMs have been shown to result from NF1 biallelic inactivation in Schwann cells and melanocytes respectively (48).

Although NF1 biallelic inactivation has been reported in CPT, the specific cell types harboring NF1 loss have not been identified. The presence of pathological periosteum suggests the involvement of the periosteum in the pathogenesis of CPT (911). Located on the outer layer of bones, the periosteum is essential for bone regeneration and contains a major source of skeletal stem/progenitor cells (SSPCs) as well as immune, endothelial, and neural cells (1218). Until now, investigations of NF1 bone manifestations in mouse models have focused mainly on the skeletal lineage and the consequences of Nf1 gene inactivation on fracture repair have been examined using bone-specific Cre lines (1923). However, targeting Nf1 solely in bone lineages does not recapitulate other NF1 features. Recent work by Radomska et al. reported the Prss56-Nf1 knockout (KO) mouse model that faithfully recapitulates several NF1 symptoms, demonstrating that Prss56-expressing boundary cap (BC) cells are the cellular origin of cutaneous and plexiform NFBs, as well as skin hyperpigmentation (24). Located at the surface of the neural tube during development, BC cells are transient neural crest-derived populations giving rise to various derivatives in nerves and skin such as Schwann cells, fibroblasts, and melanocytes (25). The common BC origin of NF1 dermatological and neurological lesions raises the question of a common cellular origin with NF1 bone manifestations.

Pharmacological interventions for NF1-related conditions are mostly targeting the RAS-MAPK signaling pathway. Several preclinical studies demonstrated the efficacy of MEK-inhibitors to counteract the elevated RAS-MAPK signaling due to reduced neurofibromin activity in cells lacking NF1 (26, 27). This led to a successful clinical trial and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of selumetinib in 2020 for patients with inoperable plexiform NFBs (2729). MEK inhibitors have also been tested in animal models exhibiting bone phenotypes associated with Nf1 loss of function in bone cells but showed limited effects (19, 22). Other approaches such as BMP2, bisphosphonates, lovastatin, and beta-catenin inhibition have also shown variable results (19, 3032).

This study aimed to identify the cellular origin and pathogenic mechanisms of CPT to develop efficient therapeutic strategies. Combined analyses of samples from patients with CPT and from the Prss56-Nf1 KO mouse model unraveled the conserved mechanisms of CPT between mice and humans. We performed genetic analyses of patient pseudarthrosis tissues to search for NF1 second hit mutations in various cell types in the periosteum including SSPCs and Schwann cells. To elucidate the role of RAS-MAPK pathway overactivation in CPT, we investigated the tibial pseudarthrosis phenotype of Prss56-Nf1 KO mice that carry Nf1 gene inactivation in BC derived SSPCs and Schwann cells in periosteum. Based on these results, we posited that combining MEK with SHP2 inhibition would drive robust responses in NF1 bone lesions, as SHP2 is a master positive regulator of RAS-MAPK pathway upstream of RAS (33, 34). We tested the efficacy of combined MEK and SHP2 inhibition to prevent pseudarthrosis in the pre-clinical Prss56-Nf1 KO mouse model.

Results

SSPCs and Schwann cells within pathological periosteum carry NF1 biallelic inactivation in CPT

To investigate the tissue specificity of NF1 biallelic inactivation in CPT, we performed NF1 targeted sequencing of tissues from the affected pseudarthrosis (PA) site, the unaffected iliac crest (IC), and blood of 17 patients undergoing surgical treatment (Figure 1AB, Table S1). We detected NF1 biallelic inactivation primarily in the periosteum of the PA site (13/17 patients, Figure 1C). We also identified NF1 biallelic inactivation in fibrous tissue (6/17 patients), bone (6/17) and bone marrow (4/17) at the PA site and in skeletal muscle (3/14) and skin (2/14) adjacent to the PA site. NF1 biallelic inactivation was not detected in blood or IC. Of note, 2 NF1 hits were detected in patients with NF1-related CPT as well as patients with isolated CPT, revealing that most CPTs are caused by NF1 loss of function (Figure 1D). We observed the same NF1 second hit in tibia and fibula in 4/5 patients affected by combined tibia and fibula CPT (Figure S1A). Moreover, in 3 patients, we identified the same NF1 second hit in PA periosteum, muscle and skin surrounding the PA site (Figure S1B). These results indicate that the second mutational event occurred during early skeletogenesis and was not restricted to the skeletal lineage. Next, we sought to identify the cell types carrying NF1 biallelic inactivation in the periosteum. We detected 2 NF1 hits in cultured periosteal SSPCs (pSSPCs) from 9 of the 13 patients carrying 2 hits in the periosteum (Figure 1E, Table S1). Thus, pSSPCs carry NF1 biallelic inactivation but are not the only affected cell type. We then performed droplet digital PCR on sorted cell populations from PA periosteum of patient P15 (Figure S1CG). The same NF1 variants were detected in SSPCs and in Schwann cells, but not in endothelial or immune cells (Figure 1F, Figure S1E). This revealed that Schwann cells also carry NF1 biallelic inactivation in CPT, and that mutated pSSPCs and Schwann cells in P15 are derived from a common lineage. NF1 inactivation in periosteum led to an increased percentage of phosphorylated positive (pERK+) cells in PA compared to IC periosteum (Figure 1G). Co-immunostaining of pERK and specific cell markers correlated with the genetic results as we observed the presence of increased percentage of pERK+CD90+ SSPCs and pERK+SOX10+ Schwann cells in PA periosteum compared to IC periosteum, but not of pERK+CD31+ endothelial cells, pERK+CD68+ immune cells, or pERK+αSMA+ pericytes/smooth muscle cells (Figure 1H). The percentages of pERK+ SSPCs and Schwann cells at PA site were correlated, suggesting the presence of both mutated cell types in all patients (Fig. S1H). Overall, the results show that SSPCs and Schwann cells within periosteum are the cell types carrying NF1 biallelic inactivation in CPT and that mutated pSSPCs and Schwann cells share a common origin.

Figure 1: Schwann cells and SSPCs within periosteum harbor NF1 biallelic inactivation in CPT.

Figure 1:

A. X-ray of the tibia and fibula pseudarthrosis (white arrows) of patient with CPT P15. B. Experimental design. DNA was extracted from tissues or periosteal SSPCs (pSSPCs) collected at the pseudarthrosis (PA) site and the iliac crest (IC), and from blood of patients with CPT undergoing surgery, and NF1 targeted sequencing was performed. C. NF1 genotyping of tissues from 17 patients with CPT shows the absence of NF1 biallelic inactivation in blood and IC and the presence of NF1 biallelic inactivation in the periosteum at PA site in 13/17 patients. NF1 biallelic inactivation was also detected in 6/17 patients in fibrous tissue and bone, in 4/17 in bone marrow, in 3/17 in muscle, and in 2/17 in PA site skin. D. Number of patients with NF1-related CPT and isolated CPT carrying NF1 biallelic inactivation. E. NF1 genotyping of periosteum and SSPCs from PA site shows the presence of NF1 biallelic inactivation in 9/13 patients. F. Left: experimental design. Cell populations were digested and sorted from PA periosteum of patient P15 and the frequency of the 2 NF1 point mutations (c.574C>T and c.5839C>T) was determined using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Right: Percentage of the 2 mutations in the different cell populations shows that Schwann cells and SSPCs carry both NF1 hits, but not endothelial and immune cells. (n= 3 replicates). G. Phospho-ERK (pERK) immunofluorescence on periosteum sections showing the number of pERK+ cells in the periosteum from PA site compared to the periosteum from IC (white arrowheads). Quantification of the percentage of pERK+ cells in the periosteum from PA and IC (n=5–6 patients per group). H. Co-immunofluorescence of pERK and CD90, SOX10, CD31, CD68 and αSMA on PA periosteum sections. I. Quantification of pERK+ cells in PA periosteum compared to IC periosteum (n= 5–6 patients per group). ** p < 0.01. BM: Bone marrow. Endo: endothelial cells. Scale bars: 50μm.

Nf1 inactivation in BC-derived pSSPCs and Schwann cells cause tibial pseudarthrosis in mice

To explore the role of SSPCs and SCs in CPT, we analyzed the Prss56-Nf1 KO mouse model (24). Lineage tracing analyses in Prss56Cre; R26tdTom mice showed that BC-derived tdTom+ cells are a rare cell population in adult bone found predominantly within the periosteum in uninjured tibia and correspond to Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor α+ (PDGFRα+) SCA1+ pSSPCs and SOX10+ Schwann cells (Figure 2A, Figure S2S3). Analyses from developmental stages to adulthood showed that Prss56 expression was not detected in bone, indicating the BC-origin of tdTom+ SSPCs and SCs in the periosteum of Prss56Cre; R26tdTom mice (Figure S4). To determine if Prss56-Nf1 KO mice exhibit congenital pseudarthrosis, we analyzed their bone parameters and induced tibial fracture in 3-month-old Prss56Cre; R26tdTom; Nf1fl/fl (Prss56-Nf1fl/fl) and Prss56Cre; R26tdTom; Nf1fl/− (Prss56-Nf1fl/−) mutant mice, and Prss56Cre; R26tdTom; Nf1+/+ (Prss56-Nf1+/+) controls. Although we only detected a mild reduction in tibial length of uninjured tibia (Figure S5), we observed a severe reduction in callus and bone volumes in both Prss56-Nf1fl/fl and Prss56-Nf1fl/− mutant mice through all stages of bone repair, as well as delayed cartilage formation and resorption (Figure S6AB). From day 14 post-fracture, we observed persistence of fibrotic tissue in the callus (Figure 2B, Figure S6A). The absence of bone bridging was striking 28 days post-fracture on micro-computed tomography (microCT) scans of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl and Prss56-Nf1fl/− mutant calluses and correlated with fibrotic accumulation (Figure 2CD, Figure S6). The percentage of bone union was significantly different between mutant and control mice (p=0.0067) but not between the mutant groups (p=0.52). We confirmed the fracture nonunion phenotype of Prss56-Nf1 KO mice using a semi-stabilized fracture model (Figure S7). Thus, Nf1 biallelic inactivation in BC-derived pSSPCs and SCs leads to tibial pseudarthrosis.

Figure 2: Tibial pseudarthrosis in mice lacking Nf1 gene in boundary cap-derived pSSPCs and Schwann cells.

Figure 2:

A. Longitudinal sections of uninjured tibia periosteum (po) from 3-month-old Prss56-Nf1+/+ mice stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin and immunofluorescence on adjacent sections showing tdTom+ periosteal skeletal stem/progenitor cells (pSSPCs) expressing PDGFRα and tdTom+ Schwann cells (SCs) expressing SOX10 along TH+ nerves (orange box: transverse imaging). B. Left: Experimental design of tibial fracture in Prss56Cre; R26tdTom; Nf1+/+ (Prss56-Nf1+/+) control, Prss56Cre; R26tdTom; Nf1fl/fl (Prss56-Nf1fl/fl) and Prss56Cre; R26tdTom; Nf1fl/− (Prss56-Nf1fl/−) mutant mice. Right: Histomorphometric quantification of the volume of callus fibrosis at days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post-fracture in Prss56-Nf1+/+, Prss56-Nf1fl/fl and Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice (n=5–6 mice per group). C. Top: Representative microCT images of calluses from Prss56-Nf1+/+, Prss56-Nf1fl/fl and Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice at 28 days post-fracture, showing absence of bone bridging in Prss56-Nf1fl/fl and Prss56-Nf1fl/− mutant mice (white arrows). Bottom, high magnification of callus periphery showing bone bridging (black arrows) in Prss56-Nf1+/+ control mice, and fibrosis and unresorbed cartilage (red, Safranin’O (SO)) in Prss56-Nf1fl/fl and Prss56-Nf1fl/− mutant mice. D. Percentage of calluses from Prss56-Nf1+/+, Prss56-Nf1fl/fl and Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice showing bone union (white), semi-union (grey), or nonunion (black) on microCT scan at day 28 post-fracture (n=6 mice per group). Bone union was significantly different between mutant and control mice (***, p=0.0067) but not between the mutant groups (p=0.52). E. Lineage tracing of Prss56-expressing Boundary Cap (BC)-derived tdTom+ cells (white arrowheads) in callus cartilage (labelled by SOX9) and fibrosis (labelled by POSTN) of Prss56-Nf1+/+ and Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice 14 days after tibial fracture. F. Quantification of tdTom+ signal in cartilage and fibrosis of Prss56-Nf1+/+ and Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice 14- and 28-days post-fracture (n=5 mice per group). G. RNAscope and immunofluorescence on callus sections of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice day 14 post-fracture show the presence of Postn-expressing tdTom+ fibroblasts and SOX10+tdTom+ SCs in fibrotic tissue. TdTom+ SC are SOX2+ and MBP and are localized along TH+ nerves. po: periosteum, b: bone, fib: fibrosis, cart: cartilage, bm: bone marrow, MBP, Myelin Basic Protein; TH, Tyrosine Hydroxylase. p-value: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Scale bars: Panel A: 25μm. Panel C-microCT: 1mm. Panel E/C-histology: 100μm. Panel G: 10μm.

Nf1-deficient BC-derived pSSPCs and Schwann cells contribute to callus fibrosis

We then investigated the identity and fate of BC derivatives in uninjured tibia and fracture callus of Prss56-Nf1+/+ and Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice. We observed an increased percentage of tdTom+ periosteal cells in Prss56-Nf1fl/f mice compared to control mice, likely due to their increased proliferation. At 14 days post-injury, tdTom+ cells were heterogeneously distributed in the fracture callus with regions rich in tdTom+ cells and regions without tdTom+ cells (Figure S8AB). In Prss56-Nf1+/+ control mice, tdTom+ cells were SOX9+ cartilage cells and OSX+ bone cells but their contribution to cartilage was decreased in Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice (Figure 2EF, Figure S8CD). TdTom+ cells were localized in POSTN+ fibrotic tissue of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl calluses and corresponded to SOX10+ Schwann cells and Postn-expressing fibroblastic cells (Figure 2G, Figure S8E). TdTom+ Schwann cells in callus fibrosis presented a repair Schwann cell phenotype as they were positive for the stemness marker SOX2, were negative for the differentiation marker Myelin Basic Protein (MBP) and were not localized along nerves (Figure 2G). Although we detected tdTom+ fibrotic cells, the fibrous tissue of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl calluses was mostly composed of non-traced cells, indicating that wild-type cells also contributed to callus fibrosis (Figure S8E). This correlated with NGS results from patient samples, where we observed absence or low percentage of NF1-mutated cells in PA fibrous tissue whereas a high percentage of NF1 mutated cells was detected in PA periosteum (Table S2). Hence, Nf1-deficient SSPC and SCs from the periosteum, as well as wild-type cells contribute to callus fibrosis in CPT.

NF1-deficient periosteal SSPCs adopt a fibrotic fate during bone repair

To explore the impact of NF1 biallelic loss on the periosteum and pSSPCs, we compared PA periosteum from patients P5 and P13 with IC periosteum from patients P13 and P15 using single-nucleus RNAseq (snRNAseq) analyses (Figure 3A, Figure S9AD). We identified 4 main cell populations: pericytes/smooth muscle cells (SMCs), endothelial cells, immune cells, and SSPCs/fibroblasts encompassing three subpopulations expressing PDGFRA, ADAM12/NCAM1 (CD56), and osteochondral genes (Figure 3BC, Figure S9D). The percentage of SSPCs/fibroblasts and ADAM12+ cells was increased in periosteum from PA site (Figure 3D). In addition, PA periosteum displayed increased fibrotic, osteogenic, chondrogenic, and cellular responses to TGFβ lineage scores compared to IC periosteum, revealing the pro-fibrotic phenotype of pSSPCs in PA periosteum (Figure 3E). We also observed increased MAPK activation lineage score in PA periosteum, correlated with biallelic NF1 loss detected in this tissue. We performed bulk RNAseq analyses of IC and PA primary pSSPCs carrying NF1 biallelic inactivation and MAPK overactivation (Figure S10E). We confirmed the pro-fibrotic phenotype of PA pSSPCs, which overexpressed fibrotic and MAPK-related genes and were enriched for Gene Ontology related to skeletal development and extracellular matrix (ECM) (Figure S10FG). We observed increased proliferation and impaired in vitro chondrogenic differentiation (5/6 patients) of PA compared to IC pSSPCs (Figure S10HI) and detected variable effect of NF1 biallelic inactivation on the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of pSSPCs (Figure S10I). To investigate the impact of NF1 loss of function on the regenerative potential of pSSPCs, we grafted PA- or IC-derived pSSPCs at the fracture site of immunodeficient mice (Figure 3F, Figure S10J). PA-derived pSSPCs switched from a chondrogenic to a fibrotic fate after fracture as they were detected within fibrotic tissue, whereas IC-derived pSSPCs mostly contributed to cartilage in the fracture callus (Figure 3G). The pro-fibrotic fate of PA-derived pSSPCs led to an increase of total callus fibrosis and altered bone healing at 28 days post-injury (Figure 3H). We also observed the fibrotic fate of Nf1-deficient pSSPCs in Prss56-Nf1 KO mice. We grafted periosteum or cultured pSSPCs from Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mutant or Prss56-Nf1+/+ control mice at the fracture site of wild-type hosts (Figure 3I, Figure S11AG). Although the contribution to the callus was equivalent (Figure S11H), we observed a reduced contribution to cartilage of mutant compared to control tdTom+ periosteum or pSSPCs. These tdTom+ mutant cells were present in callus fibrosis, indicating a fate change of Nf1-deficient pSSPCs during bone repair (Figure 3I). In sum, NF1 biallelic inactivation causes fibrotic differentiation of pSSPCs in response to bone fracture.

Figure 3: Fibrotic fate of NF1-deficient periosteal SSPCs in patients with CPT and Prss56-Nf1 KO mice.

Figure 3:

A. Experimental design. Nuclei were extracted from PA or IC periosteum, sorted, and processed for single-nuclei RNAseq. The datasets were integrated for analyses. B. UMAP projection of color-coded clustering (top) and sampling (bottom) of the integration of the datasets of IC periosteum from P15 (IC-P15, green), IC periosteum from P13 (IC-P13, blue), PA periosteum from P13 (PA-P13, red) and PA periosteum from P5 (PA-P5, yellow). C. Feature plots of the SSPC/fibroblast lineage score and ADAM12/NCAM1 (Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule 1), PDGFRA, ACAN, and RUNX2 gene expression. D. Percentage of cells from PA and IC samples in SSPC/fibroblast populations and in ADAM12+, PDGFRA+, and osteochondral clusters. E. Violin plots of the fibrotic, osteogenic, chondrogenic, MAPK activation, and cellular response to TGFβ lineage score in IC and PA. F. Experimental design. PA or IC pSSPCs from patients P3 and P4 were transplanted at the fracture site of immunodeficient mice. G. Representative callus sections stained with Picrosirius (PS). High magnification of cartilage stained with Safranin’O and fibrosis stained with PS and immunofluorescence of the human KU80 protein at day 14 post-fracture showing that IC pSSPC-derived cells are located mostly in cartilage while PA pSSPC-derived cells are located in fibrosis (white arrowheads). H. Left: Percentage of callus grafted with PA or IC pSSPCs showing union, semi-union, and nonunion at day 28 post-fracture. Right: Volume of fibrosis in day 14 and 28 post-fracture callus of immunodeficient mice grafted with human pSSPCs from IC and PA (n=6–8 mice per group). I. Left: Experimental design. Periosteum or cultured tdTom+ periosteal skeletal stem/progenitor cells (pSSPCs) were isolated from Prss56-Nf1+/+ or Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice and transplanted at the fracture site of wild-type hosts. Middle: Representative images of the contribution of grafted tdTom+ cells (white arrowheads) showing cells from Prss56-Nf1+/+ mice detected in cartilage (labelled by SOX9) and cells from Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice detected in fibrosis (labelled by POSTN). Right: Percentage of grafted tdTom+ cells in cartilage and fibrosis (n=5 mice per group). SMC: smooth muscle cells, cal: callus, fib: fibrosis, cart: cartilage. p-value: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001. Scale bars: Panel G: Low magnification: 1mm. High magnification: 100μm. Panel I: 100μm.

Fibrotic differentiation of Nf1-deficient pSSPCs is due to over activation of MAPK pathway

To uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying pSSPC fate conversion, we first investigated the role of the MAPK pathway during the early response of pSSPCs to bone fracture. We analyzed snRNAseq datasets from uninjured periosteum, and from injured periosteum and hematoma/callus at days 3, 5 and 7 post-fracture in wild-type mice (16) (Fig 4A). SSPCs follow 3 successive phases in response to injury: a stem/progenitor phase predominant in the uninjured dataset, an injury-induced fibrogenic phase predominant at days 3 and 5 post-fracture, and a bifurcation between osteogenesis and chondrogenesis, predominant at day 7 post-fracture (Figure 4B). We assessed the MAPK pathway activation during these 3 phases using a MAPK score based on the expression profile of MAPK target genes. Along pseudotime, we observed an increase of MAPK score between the SSPC and fibrogenic stages, followed by a decrease when cells engage into osteochondral lineage (Figure 4C). MAPK score was reduced in cells with high chondrogenic lineage score and Sox9 expression but remained constant in cells with a high osteogenic lineage score (Figure 4D). This showed that pSSPCs specifically downregulate the MAPK pathway to transition from the fibrogenic to the chondrogenic stage. Co-immunostaining for the chondrogenic marker SOX9 and pERK on day 7 wild-type callus sections confirmed a negative correlation between SOX9 and pERK signals (Figure 4E). Analyses in tdTom+ cells showed higher pERK and reduced SOX9 signals in Prss56-Nf1fl/fl compared to Prss56-Nf1+/+ calluses. In tdTom+ Prss56-Nf1+/+ cells, we observed a negative correlation between pERK and SOX9 signals whereas tdTom+ Prss56-Nf1fl/fl cells only exhibited high pERK and low SOX9 signals (Figure 4F). The fibrotic fate of Nf1-deficient pSSPCs is therefore caused by overactivation of MAPK signaling, which prevents the transition from fibrogenic to chondrogenic stage required for callus formation.

Figure 4: Overactivation of MAPK pathway causes fibrotic differentiation of Nf1-deficient pSSPCs.

Figure 4:

A. Experimental design of single nuclei RNAseq (snRNAseq) experiment. Nuclei were isolated from uninjured periosteum, or periosteum and hematoma of wild-type mice at days 3, 5, and 7 post- tibial fracture, sorted, and processed for snRNAseq. B. UMAP projection of clustering and monocle pseudotime trajectory of the subset of SSPCs, injury-induced fibrogenic cells, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes from integrated uninjured, day 3, day 5, and day 7 post-fracture samples. The four populations are delimited by black dashed lines. C. Scatter plot of MAPK score along pseudotime. D. Scatter plots of MAPK score along chondrogenic lineage score, Sox9 expression, fibrogenic, and osteogenic lineage scores. E. Immunofluorescence of SOX9 and phospho-ERK (pERK) in day 7 post-fracture callus section of wild type (WT) mice. Quantification and correlation of SOX9 and pERK signal per cell (red line) (n = 397 cells from 8 callus sections of 4 mice). Scale bars: low magnification, 150μm; high magnification, 25μm. F. Left: Quantification of SOX9 and pERK fluorescent signal per tdTom+ cells in day 7 post-fracture callus of Prss56-Nf1+/+ and Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice. Right: Correlation analysis of pERK and SOX9 signals in tdTom+ cells in Prss56-Nf1+/+ (top) and Prss56-Nf1fl/fl (bottom) mice (n = 209 to 238 cells from 9 sections of 3 mice per group). cart: cartilage, fib: fibrosis. ****: p < 0.0001.

Nf1-deficient Schwann cells are the main drivers of fibrosis in CPT

Because the fibrotic tissue at the pseudarthrosis site was also composed of wild-type cells in both patients with CPT and Prss56-Nf1 KO mice, we explored the role of the mutant fracture environment on SSPC fate. Transplanted wild-type GFP+ pSSPCs became fibrotic in the callus of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl but not Prss56-Nf1+/+ hosts (Figure S11I), showing the pro-fibrotic influence of the mutant callus environment. We investigated the role of Nf1-deficient pSSPCs and SCs in this deleterious paracrine effect. Although transplanted Nf1-deficient pSSPCs induced callus fibrosis in wild-type hosts, this fibrotic tissue was resorbed, and bone bridging was apparent by 28 days post-fracture (Figure S11FG). In contrast, transplantation of Nf1-deficient Schwann cells at the fracture site of wild-type hosts induced tibial pseudarthrosis with absence of bone bridging and fibrous accumulation at both 14 and 28 days post-fracture (Figure 5A). Nf1-deficient Schwann cells are therefore the main drivers of fibrotic accumulation in tibial pseudarthrosis. We generated a snRNAseq datasets of day 7 post-fracture periosteum and callus of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice and performed integration with day 7 control dataset (Figure 5B, Fig S12AD). Given the rarity of tdTom+ cells, Prss56-Nf1fl/fl dataset was composed solely of non-traced (i.e., wild-type) cells in mutant environment (Figure S12E). We observed a reduced proportion of cells in chondrogenic clusters and increased proportion of cells in fibrogenic clusters in the dataset (Figure 5CD). This indicated that wild-type pSSPCs in the mutant environment are partly retained in the fibrogenic stage.

Figure 5: Pro-fibrotic effect of Nf1-deficient Schwann cells in fibrous nonunion.

Figure 5:

A. Left: Experimental design. tdTom+ Schwann cells (SCs) were isolated from Prss56-Nf1+/+ or Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice and transplanted at the fracture site of wild-type hosts. Middle: MicroCT images of 28 days post-fracture calluses of wild-type mice grafted with SCs from Prss56-Nf1+/+ or Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice, showing absence of bridging in mice grafted with Nf1-deficient SCs (white arrow). Right: Percentage of day 28 post-fracture calluses showing union, semi-union, or nonunion. Volume of callus fibrosis at 14 and 28 days post-fracture (n=4–5 mice per group). B. Experimental design. Nuclei were isolated from periosteum and hematoma at day 7 post-fracture of control or Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice and processed for snRNAseq. Datasets were integrated. C. UMAP projection of SSPC, injury-induced fibrogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic cell subsets from the integrated day 7 post-fracture control and Prss56-Nf1fl/fl datasets. D. Violon plot of chondrogenic and fibrogenic lineage scores per dataset. Percentage of cells per cluster. E. RNAscope experiment on day 7 post-fracture callus from Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice shows the expression of Tgfb1, Pdgfa, and Osm by Sox10-, tdTom-expressing Schwann cells in callus fibrosis. F. Relative expression of Tgfb1 in day 7 post-fracture callus of Prss56-Nf1+/+ or Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice (n=5 mice per group). G. Percentage of phospho-SMAD2 positive (pSMAD2+) cells in the day 7 post-fracture callus of Prss56-Nf1+/+ or Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice (n=4 mice per group). Representative pSMAD2 immunofluorescence of Prss56-Nf1+/+ or Prss56-Nf1fl/fl callus. H. Top: Experimental design. Wild-type mice grafted with tdTom+ Schwann cells from Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice were treated with blocking TGFβ blocking antibody or IgG1 control isotype at days 5, 8, and 11 post-fracture. Middle: Picrosirius staining of fracture calluses at 14 days post-fracture. Bottom: Volume of callus fibrosis (n=4–5 mice per group). I. Top: Experimental design. Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice were treated with blocking TGFβ blocking antibody or IgG1control isotype at days 5, 8, and 11 post-fracture. Middle: MicroCT images of callus of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice treated with IgG1 isotype control or TGFβ blocking antibody at 28 days post-fracture. High magnification of the callus periphery stained with Picrosirius. Bottom left: percentage of day 28 post-fracture calluses showing union (white), semi-union (grey) or nonunion (black) on microCT scan. Bottom right: Volume of callus fibrosis of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice treated with blocking TGFβ blocking antibody or IgG1 isotype control at 28 days post-fracture. (n=4–5 mice per group). p-value: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Scale bars: Panel A/H 1mm. Panel E: 10μm. Panel G 50μm, panel I: Low magnification: 1mm, High magnification: 250 μm.

We sought to identify the factors driving the pro-fibrotic effect of Nf1-deficient Schwann cells on SSPCs. We observed that tdTom+ Schwann cells in the fibrotic tissue of Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice expressed Tgfb1, Oncostatin M (Osm) and Pdgfa (Fig. 5E), factors previously shown to be secreted by repair SCs during tissue repair (35, 36). In depth analyses of cluster 6 from the snRNAseq data, corresponding to pSSPCs transitioning from the fibrogenic to the chondrogenic stage, showed an upregulation of GO terms related to TGFβ specifically in Prss56-Nf1fl/fl dataset (Figure S13). This correlated with increased Tgfb1 expression and an increased percentage of phospho-SMAD2 (TGFβ downstream effector)-positive cells in day 7 Prss56-Nf1fl/fl compared to Prss56-Nf1+/+ calluses (Figure 5FG). To confirm the role of TGFβ in the pro-fibrotic effect of Nf1-deficient Schwann cells, we treated wild-type mice grafted with tdTom+ Prss56-Nf1fl/fl Schwann cells or Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice with TGFβ blocking antibody (Figure 5H). We observed decreased fibrosis in the callus of treated mice compared to control mice. Prss56-Nf1fl/fl mice treated with TGFβ blocking antibody exhibited bone bridging and improved union score at day 28 post-fracture (Figure 5I), indicating that TGFβ is one of the factors mediating the pro-fibrotic effect of Nf1-deficient Schwann cells in tibial pseudarthrosis.

Combined MEK and SHP2 inhibition prevents tibial pseudarthrosis

To develop therapeutic approaches for CPT, we aimed to reduce the pro-fibrotic effects of NF1 mutant pSSPCs and SCs by inhibiting RAS-MAPK overactivation. We tested the efficacy of MEK inhibition using selumetinib, SHP2 inhibition using SHP099, and the combination of MEK and SHP2 inhibitors to block RAS-MAPK overactivation and prevent CPT. We first tested the impact of MEK inhibition with or without SHP2 inhibition on MAPK activation in NF1-deficient pSSPCs from patients with CPT. We observed a substantial reduction of MAPK activation from 1 μM with combined treatment but not with single treatment compared to DMSO-treated cells (Fig 6AB). Combined MEK-SHP2 inhibition significantly reduced in vitro proliferation and increased chondrogenic differentiation of NF1-deficient pSSPCs compared to DMSO-treated cells (Figure 6CD). As Prss56-Nf1 KO mice faithfully recapitulate the bone repair defect observed in CPT, we tested the benefit of MEK-SHP2 inhibition on this relevant preclinical model of CPT by treating daily Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice with selumetinib, SHP099, combined selumetinib and SHP099, or vehicle (Figure 6E). Whereas control mice did not show bone union, mice treated with combined selumetinib and SHP099 displayed an 83% union rate (Figure 6FG), demonstrating treatment efficacy in preventing pseudarthrosis. Selumetinib treatment alone had a mild effect on union rate and SHP099 treatment alone was not as efficient as combined treatment (25% and 60% of union rate respectively, Figure 6G). Combined MEK-SHP2 inhibition was the only treatment leading to increased callus, cartilage, and bone formation and reduced fibrosis accumulation (Figure 6H). Furthermore, analysis of tdTom+ cells in the fracture callus showed that combined treatment corrects Nf1-deficient cell fate impairment, as tdTom+ cells formed cartilage instead of fibrosis in Prss56-Nf1 mutant mice treated with both SHP099 and selumetinib compared to untreated mutant mice (Figure 6I). We confirmed that the combined treatment was also efficacious in the Prx1-Nf1 KO model, in which the pseudarthrosis phenotype results from Nf1 inactivation in all pSSPCs (Fig. S14). Overall, combined MEK-SHP2 inhibition efficiently prevented fibrous accumulation and pseudarthrosis, demonstrating its promising therapeutic potential.

Figure 6: Combined MEK and SHP2 inhibition prevents fibrous nonunion in Prss56-Nf1 KO mice.

Figure 6:

A. Experimental design. Periosteal SSPCs from PA site of patients with CPT were treated with MEK inhibitor (selumetinib), SHP2 inhibitor (SHP099), MEK and SHP2 inhibitors (selumetinib and SHP099), or vehicle (DMSO) for in vitro analyses. B. MAPK pathway activation in pSSPCs from PA site treated with selumetinib, SHP099, selumetinib and SHP099, or DMSO measured by the pERK/ERK ratio on Western blot. Statistical significance was determined compared to DMSO control (n=3 patients). C. Reduced in vitro proliferation of pSSPCs from PA site treated with combined selumetinib and SHP099 (n=3 patients). D. Increased in vitro chondrogenic differentiation measured by SOX9 expression of pSSPCs from PA site treated with combined selumetinib and SHP099 (n=3 patients in duplicates). E. Experimental design. Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice were treated by oral gavage with selumetinib, SHP099, selumetinib and SHP099, or vehicle from days 5 to 14 post-fracture. F. Representative microCT images of callus from Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice at 28 days post-fracture, with bone bridging indicated by white arrows. G. Percentage of calluses from treated and control Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice showing bone union (white), semi-union (grey), or nonunion (black) on microCT scan at day 28 post-fracture (n=4–6 mice per group). H. Volume of callus, cartilage, bone, and fibrosis at days 14 and 28 post-fracture in treated and control Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice (n=4–6 mice per group). I. Surface of tdTom signal in cartilage and fibrosis of day 14 and 28 callus from treated and control Prss56-Nf1fl/− mice. Scale bars: 1mm. p-value: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Discussion

In this study, we uncover the cellular origin and underlying molecular mechanisms of CPT, demonstrating that SSPCs and Schwann cells are the affected cell types in CPT. We detected NF1 biallelic inactivation in SSPCs and Schwann cells and increased numbers of pERK+ SSPCs and Schwann cells in pathological periosteum of patients with CPT. These findings correlate with the presence of Nf1-deficient SSPCs and Schwann cells in the periosteum and fibrous callus of Prss56-Nf1 KO mice that exhibit tibial pseudarthrosis. Functionally, human and murine NF1-deficient pSSPCs in both Prss56-Nf1 KO and Prx1-Nf1 KO mouse models displayed a pro-fibrotic phenotype and contributed to callus fibrosis. The role of MAPK signaling in regulating SSPC differentiation is unclear, as previous studies showed beneficial and deleterious effect of MAPK cascade in chondrogenesis (3742). Using snRNAseq, we established the temporal dynamics of MAPK signaling required during pSSPC activation and differentiation in response to fracture. MAPK signaling is first up-regulated in pSSPCs that transition from a stem/progenitor state to an injury-induced fibrogenic state and is down-regulated during the transition from the fibrogenic state to chondrogenesis. These results provide the molecular mechanism explaining the retention of NF1-deficient pSSPCs in the fibrogenic state as they fail to downregulate MAPK signaling due to NF1 loss of function. Consequently, fibrotic pSSPCs accumulate in the center of the callus and interfere with fracture consolidation. These results may have a broader impact in understanding other fibrotic bone repair disorders sharing similar mechanisms with CPT.

Most strikingly, we demonstrate that NF1 biallelic inactivation in CPT is not restricted to the skeletal lineage. Our results highlight the pivotal role of Schwann cells (SCs), a neural cell type, in promoting callus fibrosis in CPT. We identified NF1-deficient SCs as the source of pro-fibrotic factors causing tibial pseudarthrosis in Prss56-Nf1 KO mice. Although Nf1-deficient pSSPCs exert a pro-fibrotic effect, SCs are the main fibrotic drivers in CPT recruiting wild type pSSPCs to contribute also to callus fibrosis. SCs in the fibrous callus of Prss56-Nf1 KO mice exhibit a repair SC phenotype. Previous studies showed that MAPK pathway regulates the transition from SCs to repair SCs suggesting that Nf1-deficient SCs may be blocked in a repair SC state and maintain the secretion of pro-fibrotic factors in CPT (4345). We showed that Nf1-deficient SCs express several profibrotic factors including Tgfb1, Osm, and Pdgfa, and that inhibiting TGFβ improves healing in Prss56-Nf1 KO mice. This study provides evidence that SCs can interfere with the repair process of non-peripheral nervous tissues and promote fibrotic tissue accumulation. Whereas previous studies highlighted the key paracrine role of SCs in skin and digit tip regeneration, the involvement of SCs and peripheral nerves in tissue repair dysfunctions and fibrotic disorders remains understudied (35, 36, 46).

The involvement of both pSSPCs and SCs in CPT reveals new mechanisms for NF1 bone manifestations. CPT and other NF1 bone phenotypes have been investigated independent of other NF1 symptoms, presumably because the cell types involved have distinct embryonic origins. SCs and melanocytes, responsible for NFBs and CALMs, are neural crest-derived, whereas axial and appendicular bones are derived from the mesoderm. Our genetic analysis of the NF1 mutational landscape in CPT revealed that NF1 2nd hit occurs early during embryonic development and is not restricted to the skeletal lineage of mesodermal origin. In addition, we detected the same 2 NF1 hits in SSPCs and SCs in pathological periosteum of one patient with CPT, showing that both affected cell types share a common origin. In mice, we identified BCs as a population giving rise to SCs and pSSPCs in long bones and showed that Nf1 loss in these derivatives cause pseudarthrosis. This shows that BCs are the cellular origin of CPT in mice, and presumably in NF1 patients. The Prss56-Nf1 KO model faithfully recapitulates the variability of NF1 symptoms, indicating that CPT shares a common BC origin with NFBs and CALMs (24). In addition to sharing a common cellular origin, we further reveal that CPTs and NFBs share common pathogenic mechanisms. In NFBs, Nf1-deficient SCs also secrete profibrotic factors, including TGFβ and SCF, to promote fibroblast accumulation and proliferation involved in tumor progression (4749). Our study thus highlights the parallels between NF1 symptoms and calls for more integrated analysis of NF1 features.

Beside unraveling the pathogenic bases of CPT, we demonstrate the relevance of the Prss56-Nf1 KO mouse model as a preclinical model for CPT-related fibrous nonunion. Because NF1 symptoms share common pathogenic mechanisms, we considered therapeutical strategies developed for tumoral manifestations and showed that they can also be considered for CPT treatment. Selumetinib is FDA-approved for inoperable NFBs yet did not reveal substantial effects in previous mouse models of NF1 bone manifestations (19, 32, 50). Therefore, we tested the combination of MEK and SHP2 inhibitors to counteract the pro-fibrotic effects of NF1-deficient pSSPCs and SCs. We observed a therapeutic effect of the selumetinib/SHP099 combination with efficient MAPK inhibition in NF1-deficient pSSPCs and restoration of the in vitro proliferation and differentiation potential of human pSSPCs. In vivo treatment of Prss56-Nf1 KO or Prx1-Nf1 KO mice showed promising results, with bone union in 83% and 100% of calluses respectively, concomitant with a drastic decrease in fibrotic accumulation one month after fracture. The effect of a 10-day oral treatment opens the door to clinical strategies for CPT overcoming potential tolerability issues of combining SHP2 and MEK inhibitors. In addition, the possibility of using local delivery to minimize these issues could also be tested. These results represent a potential breakthrough in improving the prognosis for CPT patients.

There are limitations to this study. CPT is extremely rare (1/150 000 individuals) and patients undergo surgical treatment at a young age (first surgery at 3.1 ± 1 years-old in our cohort). Thus, obtaining periosteum samples of patients with CPT is challenging and only small amounts of tissues can be collected. This strongly limits our ability to isolate rare cell populations, including SCs, for extensive analyses. Similarly, in Prss56-Nf1 KO mice, BC derivatives represent a rare subset of cells in intact periosteum and in the callus after fracture. This highlights the strong paracrine effect of Nf1-deficient cells but makes it challenging to isolate BC-derived cells to further explore the impact of Nf1 loss of function in these cells. Last, the Prss56-Nf1 KO mouse model recapitulates the fibrous nonunion phenotype, but not congenital tibial bowing, which might suggest independent mechanisms and require further studies.

Materials and Methods

Study design

In our study, we aimed to understand the mechanisms causing CPT. We combined the analyses of samples from patients undergoing surgery for CPT with the analyses of the relevant Prss56-Nf1 KO mouse model. For the human cohort, we collected tissues from patients operated for CPT at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital during this study and formal consent was obtained. For each patient, the affected PA tissue was compared with non-affected IC tissue. Two patients undergoing reintervention were excluded from the cohort as original PA tissues from the first resection were not accessible and we did not detect NF1 biallelic inactivation. Therefore, we could not conclude on the presence/absence of NF1 mutation. For the mouse study, all animals used for the study were included except samples with distal or proximal fractures that can affect bone repair. No outliers were excluded from the study. Based on our previous publications (12, 13, 51), groups of 3 to 7 samples are sufficient to assess statistical differences between groups. The n for individual experiments is indicated in the figure legends. Every group is composed of samples from at least 2 independent experiments. For both human and mouse studies, samples were assigned a unique sample number for blinded analyses. No randomization methods were used for the study, as groups were homogeneous and composed of equivalent animals based on gender, age, and genotype.

Human tissue sample collection

Cohort and ethical approval

Sample collection from patients affected by congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) was performed at Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee CPP-IDF-2 (#ID-RCB/EUDRACT: 2014- A01420–47; IMNIS2014–03). Informed consents of legal representatives of patients were obtained prior to sample collection. The cohort was composed of 17 patients, 7 diagnosed with NF1-associated CPT and 10 with isolated CPT. NF1 diagnosis was performed by the Dermatology department at Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, following guidelines from International Consensus Group on Neurofibromatosis Diagnostic Criteria. Isolated CPT was defined by the absence of additional NF1 clinical feature and the absence of NF1 pathogenic variant in blood sample. Fourteen patients were undergoing surgery as a primary treatment (named “Primary” operation in Table S1) and 3 were undergoing additional surgery following initial treatment (named “Reintervention”). Detailed information about patient age, gender, NF1 diagnosis, type of operation and affected bones are reported in Table S1.

Sample collection

Tissues were collected during CPT treatment surgery using the induced membrane technique typically performed in 2 steps (52). The first surgical procedure consists of pseudarthrosis tissue resection, intramedullary nailing, and insertion of a cement spacer to fill the gap. During this procedure, affected periosteum, bone marrow, bone, fibrous tissue, muscle, and skin from the PA site were collected. For patients undergoing surgery as secondary treatment, the primary pseudarthrosis tissues were unavailable but were collected adjacent to the primary PA site when possible. After 6 to 8 weeks, a second surgical procedure was performed to remove the cement spacer and graft autologous iliac crest periosteum and cancellous bone in the induced membrane that formed around the cement. During this second procedure, unaffected periosteum and spongy bone from the iliac crest (IC) were harvested. A blood sample was also collected during surgery. Tissue dissection and identification was performed by orthopedic surgeons. Collected tissues were immediately placed in DMEM (21063029, ThermoFischer Scientific) with 10% HEPES (15630056, ThermoFischer Scientific) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (15140122, ThermoFischer Scientific) at 4°C, and processed for NF1 genotyping, single-nuclei RNAseq, primary culture and histological analyses as described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Mice

C57BL/6ScNj, Prx1Cre (IMSR_JAX:005584) (53), Rosa26-mtdTomato-mEGFP (R26mTmG) (IMSR_JAX:007676) (54), R26tdTomato (R26tdTom) (IMSR_JAX:007914) (55), Nf1flox (Nf1fl) (IMSR_JAX:017640), Nf1-knock out (Nf1) (56) were obtained from Jackson Laboratory. Prss56Cre mice were generated by Piotr Topilko (24, 25). Immunodeficient nude CD1 mice were purchased from Janvier Labs. Mice were bred in animal facilities at IMRB, Creteil and Imagine Institute, Paris. Two to five mice were kept in separated ventilated cages, in a pathogen-controlled environment with 12/12-hour light/dark cycles and ad libitum access to water and food. All procedures performed were approved by Paris University or Paris Est Creteil University Ethical Committees (#2795–201506051048131, #19295–2019052015468705, #27181–202009141201846, #33818–2021110818301267). Males and females were mixed in experimental groups. No specific randomization method was used. Bone injury and tissue collection for graft and digestion were performed on 10- to 14-week-old mice. Six- to 8-week-old mice were used for primary periosteum culture. Controlled breeding was performed to collect embryonic tissues at 12.5, 13.5, and 14.5 days of development. Samples were labeled at the time of tissue collection and using a labeling system allowing blind analyses in all experiments.

Statistical analyses

Data are reported as mean +/− standard deviation. n represents the number of samples used for the analysis. For human experiments, each sample corresponds to a different patient. For mouse experiments, each sample corresponds to an individual mouse. Statistical differences between experimental groups were evaluated using GraphPad Prism. For comparison between 2 groups, two-side Mann-Whitney test was used. For comparison between 3 or 4 groups, one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Šídák’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test was used. The comparison in bone bridging between mutants and control groups was performed using Chi-squared test. For SOX9/pERK signal correlation, each value corresponds to an individual cell. Correlation analysis and simple linear regression were performed to assess the correlation between both signals. Significance was determined as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. All experiments were performed in at least 2 independent experiments.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental text
Supplemental Fig.13
Supplemental Fig. 14
Supplemental Fig.12
Supplemental Fig. 10
Supplemental Fig. 11
Supplemental Fig.9
Supplemental Fig.8
Supplemental Fig.7
Supplemental Fig.6
Supplemental Fig.5
Supplemental Fig.4
Supplemental Fig.3
Supplemental Fig.2
Supplemental Fig. 1
Supplemental Table
MDAR Reproducibility Checklist
Data S1

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Henry, A. Guigan and O. Pellé from the Flow Cytometry platforms of IMRB and Imagine Institute, L. Slimani and K. Henri from Life Imaging Facility of Paris Cité University (Plateforme Imagerie du Vivant “Micro-CT platform”), all the staff from the Imagine genomic core facility at Imagine Institute and N. Cagnard from Bioinformatics Platform at Imagine Institute for advice and technical assistance. We thank A. Julien, C. Goachet, M. Ethel, S. Berger, E. Tacu, E. Paniel, A. Heisler, and M. Mansour for technical assistance or advice.

Fundings

This work was supported by Association Neurofibromatoses et Recklinghausen (C.C and B.P.), Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (C.C. and St.P.), Agence Nationale de la Recherche-18-CE14–0033 and 21-CE18–007-01 (C.C, P.T. and B.P.), US Department of the Army NF220019 (C.C.), National Institutes of Health NIAMS R01 AR081671 (C.C.), and IMRB Cross team award (C.C. and P.T.). S. Perrin and O. Duchamp de Lageneste were supported by a PhD fellowship from Paris Cité University.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data and materials availability

All data from this study are present in the paper or supplementary materials. Single-nuclei RNAseq and bulk RNAseq datasets generated for this study are deposited in GEO (GSE232516, GSE232517, GSE234071) and are publicly available.

References

  • 1.Pannier S, Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 97, 750–761 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siebert MJ, Makarewich CA, Anterolateral Tibial Bowing and Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia: Current Concept Review and Future Directions. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 15, 438–446 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gutmann DH, Ferner RE, Listernick RH, Korf BR, Wolters PL, Johnson KJ, Neurofibromatosis type 1. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3, 17004 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Eisenbarth I, Assum G, Kaufmann D, Krone W, Evidence for the presence of the second allele of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene in melanocytes derived from café au laitmacules of NF1 patients. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237, 138–141 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kluwe L, Friedrich R, Mautner VF, Loss of NF1 allele in Schwann cells but not in fibroblasts derived from an NF1-associated neurofibroma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24, 283–285 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Le LQ, Liu C, Shipman T, Chen Z, Suter U, Parada LF, Susceptible stages in Schwann cells for NF1-associated plexiform neurofibroma development. Cancer Res 71, 4686–4695 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu J, Williams JP, Rizvi TA, Kordich JJ, Witte D, Meijer D, Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Cancelas JA, Ratner N, Plexiform and dermal neurofibromas and pigmentation are caused by Nf1 loss in desert hedgehog-expressing cells. Cancer Cell 13, 105–116 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhu Y, Ghosh P, Charnay P, Burns DK, Parada LF, Neurofibromas in NF1: Schwann cell origin and role of tumor environment. Science 296, 920–922 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hermanns-Sachweh B, Senderek J, Alfer J, Klosterhalfen B, Büttner R, Füzesi L, Weber M, Vascular changes in the periosteum of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Pathol Res Pract 201, 305–312 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stevenson DA, Zhou H, Ashrafi S, Messiaen LM, Carey JC, D’Astous JL, Santora SD, Viskochil DH, Double inactivation of NF1 in tibial pseudarthrosis. Am J Hum Genet 79, 143–148 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brekelmans C, Hollants S, De Groote C, Sohier N, Maréchal M, Geris L, Luyten FP, Ginckels L, Sciot R, de Ravel T, De Smet L, Lammens J, Legius E, Brems H, Neurofibromatosis type 1-related pseudarthrosis: Beyond the pseudarthrosis site. Hum Mutat 40, 1760–1767 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Duchamp de Lageneste O, Julien A, Abou-Khalil R, Frangi G, Carvalho C, Cagnard N, Cordier C, Conway SJ, Colnot C, Periosteum contains skeletal stem cells with high bone regenerative potential controlled by Periostin. Nat Commun 9, 773 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Julien A, Perrin S, Martínez-Sarrà E, Kanagalingam A, Carvalho C, Luka M, Ménager M, Colnot C, Skeletal stem/progenitor cells in periosteum and skeletal muscle share a common molecular response to bone injury. J of Bone & Mineral Res, jbmr.4616 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li Z, Meyers CA, Chang L, Lee S, Li Z, Tomlinson R, Hoke A, Clemens TL, James AW, Fracture repair requires TrkA signaling by skeletal sensory nerves. Journal of Clinical Investigation 129, 5137–5150 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matthews BG, Novak S, Sbrana FV, Funnell JL, Cao Y, Buckels EJ, Grcevic D, Kalajzic I, Heterogeneity of murine periosteum progenitors involved in fracture healing. eLife 10, e58534 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Perrin S, Wotawa C-A, Bretegnier V, Luka M, Coulpier F, Masson C, Ménager M, Colnot C, Single nuclei transcriptomics reveal the differentiation trajectories of periosteal skeletal/stem progenitor cells in bone regeneration (2024), doi: 10.7554/eLife.92519.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.van Gastel N, Stegen S, Eelen G, Schoors S, Carlier A, Daniëls VW, Baryawno N, Przybylski D, Depypere M, Stiers P-J, Lambrechts D, Van Looveren R, Torrekens S, Sharda A, Agostinis P, Lambrechts D, Maes F, Swinnen JV, Geris L, Van Oosterwyck H, Thienpont B, Carmeliet P, Scadden DT, Carmeliet G, Lipid availability determines fate of skeletal progenitor cells via SOX9. Nature 579, 111–117 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sales de Gauzy J, Fitoussi F, Jouve J-L, Karger C, Badina A, Masquelet A-C, Traumatic diaphyseal bone defects in children. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 98, 220–226 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ndong J. de la Croix, Stevens DM, Vignaux G, Uppuganti S, Perrien DS, Yang X, Nyman JS, Harth E, Elefteriou F, Combined MEK Inhibition and BMP2 Treatment Promotes Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Healing in Nf1 Osx −/− Mice: RAS/ERK SIGNALING IN OSTEOPROGENITORS. J Bone Miner Res 30, 55–63 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.El Khassawna T, Toben D, Kolanczyk M, Schmidt-Bleek K, Koennecke I, Schell H, Mundlos S, Duda GN, Deterioration of fracture healing in the mouse model of NF1 long bone dysplasia. Bone 51, 651–660 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kamiya N, Yamaguchi R, Aruwajoye O, Kim AJ, Kuroyanagi G, Phipps M, Adapala NS, Feng JQ, Kim HK, Targeted Disruption of NF1 in Osteocytes Increases FGF23 and Osteoid With Osteomalacia-like Bone Phenotype: NF1 DISRUPTION IN OSTEOCYTES CAUSES A MINERALIZATION DEFECT. J Bone Miner Res 32, 1716–1726 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sharma R, Wu X, Rhodes SD, Chen S, He Y, Yuan J, Li J, Yang X, Li X, Jiang L, Kim ET, Stevenson DA, Viskochil D, Xu M, Yang F-C, Hyperactive Ras/MAPK signaling is critical for tibial nonunion fracture in neurofibromin-deficient mice. Human Molecular Genetics 22, 4818–4828 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang W, Nyman JS, Ono K, Stevenson DA, Yang X, Elefteriou F, Mice lacking Nf1 in osteochondroprogenitor cells display skeletal dysplasia similar to patients with neurofibromatosis type I. Human Molecular Genetics 20, 3910–3924 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Radomska KJ, Coulpier F, Gresset A, Schmitt A, Debbiche A, Lemoine S, Wolkenstein P, Vallat J-M, Charnay P, Topilko P, Cellular Origin, Tumor Progression, and Pathogenic Mechanisms of Cutaneous Neurofibromas Revealed by Mice with Nf1 Knockout in Boundary Cap Cells. Cancer Discov 9, 130–147 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gresset A, Coulpier F, Gerschenfeld G, Jourdon A, Matesic G, Richard L, Vallat J-M, Charnay P, Topilko P, Boundary Caps Give Rise to Neurogenic Stem Cells and Terminal Glia in the Skin. Stem Cell Reports 5, 278–290 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ahsan S, Ge Y, Tainsky MA, Combinatorial therapeutic targeting of BMP2 and MEK-ERK pathways in NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Oncotarget 7, 57171–57185 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dombi E, Baldwin A, Marcus LJ, Fisher MJ, Weiss B, Kim A, Whitcomb P, Martin S, Aschbacher-Smith LE, Rizvi TA, Wu J, Ershler R, Wolters P, Therrien J, Glod J, Belasco JB, Schorry E, Brofferio A, Starosta AJ, Gillespie A, Doyle AL, Ratner N, Widemann BC, Activity of Selumetinib in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas. N Engl J Med 375, 2550–2560 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Casey D, Demko S, Sinha A, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Shen Y-L, Khasar S, Goheer MA, Helms WS, Pan L, Xu Y, Fan J, Leong R, Liu J, Yang Y, Windsor K, Ou M, Stephens O, Oh B, Reaman GH, Nair A, Shord SS, Bhatnagar V, Daniels SR, Sickafuse S, Goldberg KB, Theoret MR, Pazdur R, Singh H, FDA Approval Summary: Selumetinib for Plexiform Neurofibroma. Clin Cancer Res 27, 4142–4146 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gross AM, Dombi E, Wolters PL, Baldwin A, Dufek A, Herrera K, Martin S, Derdak J, Heisey KS, Whitcomb PM, Steinberg SM, Venzon DJ, Fisher MJ, Kim AR, Bornhorst M, Weiss BD, Blakeley JO, Smith MA, Widemann BC, Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Selumetinib in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 on a Phase 1/2 Trial for Inoperable Plexiform Neurofibromas. Neuro Oncol, noad086 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Baht GS, Nadesan P, Silkstone D, Alman BA, Pharmacologically targeting beta-catenin for NF1 associated deficiencies in fracture repair. Bone 98, 31–36 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Deo N, Cheng TL, Mikulec K, Peacock L, Little DG, Schindeler A, Improved union and bone strength in a mouse model of NF1 pseudarthrosis treated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and zoledronic acid: rhBMP-2 AND ZA FOR NF1 PSEUDARTHROSIS. J. Orthop. Res (2017), doi: 10.1002/jor.23672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang W, Nyman JS, Moss HE, Gutierrez G, Mundy GR, Yang X, Elefteriou F, Local low-dose lovastatin delivery improves the bone-healing defect caused by Nf1 loss of function in osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 25, 1658–1667 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cai J, Jacob S, Kurupi R, Dalton KM, Coon C, Greninger P, Egan RK, Stein GT, Murchie E, McClanaghan J, Adachi Y, Hirade K, Dozmorov M, Glod J, Boikos SA, Ebi H, Hao H, Caponigro G, Benes CH, Faber AC, High-risk neuroblastoma with NF1 loss of function is targetable using SHP2 inhibition. Cell Rep 40, 111095 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang J, Pollard K, Allen AN, Tomar T, Pijnenburg D, Yao Z, Rodriguez FJ, Pratilas CA, Combined Inhibition of SHP2 and MEK Is Effective in Models of NF1-Deficient Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors. Cancer Res 80, 5367–5379 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Johnston APW, Yuzwa SA, Carr MJ, Mahmud N, Storer MA, Krause MP, Jones K, Paul S, Kaplan DR, Miller FD, Dedifferentiated Schwann Cell Precursors Secreting Paracrine Factors Are Required for Regeneration of the Mammalian Digit Tip. Cell Stem Cell 19, 433–448 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Parfejevs V, Debbache J, Shakhova O, Schaefer SM, Glausch M, Wegner M, Suter U, Riekstina U, Werner S, Sommer L, Injury-activated glial cells promote wound healing of the adult skin in mice. Nat Commun 9, 236 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bobick BE, Kulyk WM, MEK-ERK signaling plays diverse roles in the regulation of facial chondrogenesis. Exp Cell Res 312, 1079–1092 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bobick BE, Kulyk WM, The MEK-ERK signaling pathway is a negative regulator of cartilage-specific gene expression in embryonic limb mesenchyme. J Biol Chem 279, 4588–4595 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li J, Zhao Z, Liu J, Huang N, Long D, Wang J, Li X, Liu Y, MEK/ERK and p38 MAPK regulate chondrogenesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through delicate interaction with TGF-beta1/Smads pathway. Cell Prolif 43, 333–343 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Murakami S, Kan M, McKeehan WL, de Crombrugghe B, Up-regulation of the chondrogenic Sox9 gene by fibroblast growth factors is mediated by the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 1113–1118 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oh CD, Chang SH, Yoon YM, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Kang SS, Chun JS, Opposing role of mitogen-activated protein kinase subtypes, erk-1/2 and p38, in the regulation of chondrogenesis of mesenchymes. J Biol Chem 275, 5613–5619 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Weston AD, Chandraratna RAS, Torchia J, Underhill TM, Requirement for RAR-mediated gene repression in skeletal progenitor differentiation. J Cell Biol 158, 39–51 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Harrisingh MC, Perez-Nadales E, Parkinson DB, Malcolm DS, Mudge AW, Lloyd AC, The Ras/Raf/ERK signalling pathway drives Schwann cell dedifferentiation. EMBO J 23, 3061–3071 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Napoli I, Noon LA, Ribeiro S, Kerai AP, Parrinello S, Rosenberg LH, Collins MJ, Harrisingh MC, White IJ, Woodhoo A, Lloyd AC, A central role for the ERK-signaling pathway in controlling Schwann cell plasticity and peripheral nerve regeneration in vivo. Neuron 73, 729–742 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cervellini I, Galino J, Zhu N, Allen S, Birchmeier C, Bennett DL, Sustained MAPK/ERK Activation in Adult Schwann Cells Impairs Nerve Repair. J Neurosci 38, 679–690 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Johnston APW, Naska S, Jones K, Jinno H, Kaplan DR, Miller FD, Sox2-mediated regulation of adult neural crest precursors and skin repair. Stem Cell Reports 1, 38–45 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Badache A, Muja N, De Vries GH, Expression of Kit in neurofibromin-deficient human Schwann cells: role in Schwann cell hyperplasia associated with type 1 neurofibromatosis. Oncogene 17, 795–800 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mashour GA, Ratner N, Khan GA, Wang HL, Martuza RL, Kurtz A, The angiogenic factor midkine is aberrantly expressed in NF1-deficient Schwann cells and is a mitogen for neurofibroma-derived cells. Oncogene 20, 97–105 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Patmore DM, Welch S, Fulkerson PC, Wu J, Choi K, Eaves D, Kordich JJ, Collins MH, Cripe TP, Ratner N, In Vivo Regulation of TGF-β by R-Ras2 Revealed through Loss of the RasGAP Protein NF1. Cancer Research 72, 5317–5327 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.El-Hoss J, Cheng T, Carpenter EC, Sullivan K, Deo N, Mikulec K, Little DG, Schindeler A, A Combination of rhBMP-2 (Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2) and MEK (MAP Kinase/ERK Kinase) Inhibitor PD0325901 Increases Bone Formation in a Murine Model of Neurofibromatosis Type I Pseudarthrosis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 96, e117 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Julien A, Kanagalingam A, Martínez-Sarrà E, Megret J, Luka M, Ménager M, Relaix F, Colnot C, Direct contribution of skeletal muscle mesenchymal progenitors to bone repair. Nature Communications 12, 2860 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Masquelet AC, Fitoussi F, Begue T, Muller GP, [Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 45, 346–353 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Logan M, Martin JF, Nagy A, Lobe C, Olson EN, Tabin CJ, Expression of Cre recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by aPrxl enhancer. genesis 33, 77–80 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Muzumdar MD, Tasic B, Miyamichi K, Li L, Luo L, A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, Lein ES, Zeng H, A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 13, 133–140 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhu Y, Romero MI, Ghosh P, Ye Z, Charnay P, Rushing EJ, Marth JD, Parada LF, Ablation of NF1 function in neurons induces abnormal development of cerebral cortex and reactive gliosis in the brain. Genes Dev 15, 859–876 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental text
Supplemental Fig.13
Supplemental Fig. 14
Supplemental Fig.12
Supplemental Fig. 10
Supplemental Fig. 11
Supplemental Fig.9
Supplemental Fig.8
Supplemental Fig.7
Supplemental Fig.6
Supplemental Fig.5
Supplemental Fig.4
Supplemental Fig.3
Supplemental Fig.2
Supplemental Fig. 1
Supplemental Table
MDAR Reproducibility Checklist
Data S1

Data Availability Statement

All data from this study are present in the paper or supplementary materials. Single-nuclei RNAseq and bulk RNAseq datasets generated for this study are deposited in GEO (GSE232516, GSE232517, GSE234071) and are publicly available.

RESOURCES