Abstract
Stem rot disease (Agroathelia rolfsii) biocontrol is an environmentally safe alternative that could potentially decrease disease severity and limit plant and yield losses. In the present investigation, 11 actinomycetes isolates, recovered from disease-suppressive composts, were tested as whole cell suspensions and cell-free culture filtrates for their ability to suppress tomato stem rot and to stimulate plant growth. Five isolates (namely A5-3, A2-4, A3-4, A4-4 and A5-4), applied as cell suspensions, were found to be the most effective in suppressing disease severity by 37.5–56.2% compared to the untreated control and 25-56.2% using their cell-free culture filtrates. The in vitro antifungal activity of isolates tested and their filtrates were estimated at 58.8–88% and 59-91.3% decrease in fungus mycelial growth, respectively. As for their growth-promoting ability, tomato plants treated with A5-3, A2-4, A3-4, A4-4 and A5-4 isolates were 20-89.1% and 10.3–79% higher than A. rolfsii-inoculated and pathogen-free controls, respectively. Inoculated and uninoculated plants treated with filtrates showed significant increments in their growth parameters by 18.2–91.9% and 15.3–93.4% over control, respectively. The most bioactive isolates against target pathogen were affiliated, based on 16 S rDNA gene sequencing, to Streptomyces, Saccharomonospora and Micromonospora genera. All these isolates were shown able to produce indole-3-acetic acid. Streptomyces sp. (A5-3) and Streptomyces sp. (A5-4) displayed chitinase, protease and lipase activities together with phosphate solubilization and nitrogen-fixing abilities. Streptomyces sp. (A5-3) displayed the greatest amylolytic activity and ability to solubilize zinc and to produce siderophores and hydrogen cyanide. This investigation demonstrated that actinomycetes recovered from disease-suppressive composts can be explored as potential sources of bio-active compounds with antifungal and bio-fertilizing abilities useful for the improvement of tomato growth and health.
Keywords: Actinomycetes, Agroathelia rolfsii, Biocontrol, Characterization, Stem rot severity, Tomato growth
Introduction
Soilborne diseases are a serious threat to crop yield [1]. Southern blight or stem rot, caused by Agroathelia rolfsii (Cruzi) Tu &.
Kimbrough (syn. Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.), is a devastating soilborne disease [2, 3]. The fungus has a wide host range exceeding 500 plant species including leguminous and vegetable crops [4, 5]. Infection process occurs at all growth stages where the fungus directly attacks healthy plant tissues using various pathogenicity factors such as cell-wall degrading enzymes and other secondary metabolites. A. rolfsii is able to produce oxalic acid [6] and various cellulolytic and pectinolytic enzymes to lower pH, sequester calcium from cell walls, suppress host defensive responses, and induce serious alterations in the infected tissues [7, 8]. Severely diseased plants may ultimately wilt thus leading to serious stand reductions and subsequently yield losses reaching 100% depending on growing conditions and host plant [5, 9, 10].
A. rolfsii is especially difficult to control due to its wide range of alternative hosts, the lack of resistant cultivars, and its ability to overwinter in soil for several years as sclerotia [4, 11]. In the world, this disease is frequently managed using chemical methods. However, the hazardous application of these agrochemicals induces deleterious effects on human health and environmental and food safety [12].
Among the most widely explored alternatives for achieving sustainable plant disease management, biocontrol using various beneficial microorganisms has gained increased attention [13–17]. Microorganisms are able to suppress soilborne pathogens either directly through antagonism or indirectly through spatial and/or trophic competition for available resources and by stimulating plant defensive mechanisms or both [18, 19].
Beneficial microorganisms were isolated from disease-suppressive soils with low disease incidence [20, 21] and/or composts [22–24]. Among the widely recovered compost-associated microbial agents, bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes were the focal driving forces for plant disease bio-suppression and growth stimulation [25].
Actinomycetes are prokaryotic organisms and a distinct group of gram-positive bacteria with a significant ability to suppress various airborne and soilborne plant diseases [26–28], to enhance plant and soil health [29, 30], and to mitigate the adverse effects of abiotic stresses [31, 32]. The key mechanism of action displayed by actinomycetes is the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites with various biological properties [33–35]. These microbial agents can protect plants by inhibiting the development of fungal pathogens through the production of antifungal compounds or cell-wall degrading enzymes [29, 36]. They can also improve plant growth via the production of siderophores and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [37, 38] and/or by carrying out symbiotic fixation of nitrogen [39]. Successful biocontrol using actinomycetes has been reported against numerous soilborne pathogens including Fusarium oxysporum [40, 41], Rhizoctonia solani [40, 42], Verticillium dahliae [43, 44], Phytophthora sp. [45], and Pythium ultimum [46]. However, to the best of our knowledge, little information is available on the potential use of actinomycetes for the biocontrol of stem rot disease of tomato induced by A. rolfsii.
Therefore, given the importance of the tomato crop in Tunisia, the polyphagic nature of target pathogen and its ability to induce serious plant losses, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of compost-associated actinomycetes to suppress stem rot disease and to promote growth of tomato plants. The most effective isolates were screened for their in vitro antifungal potential and plant growth-promoting features.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cv. Rio Grande seeds were used in the current study. They were disinfected by immersion into 70% ethanol for 2 min then into 0.2% sodium hypochlorite solution for 3 min. They were rinsed several times with sterile distilled water and allowed to dry under laminar flow. Seeds were sown in 77-alveolated trays filled with commercialized peat (Klasmann-Deilmann, Bio-Substrate, Germany), regularly watered to avoid water stress and kept under greenhouse conditions at 25 ± 5 °C air temperature, 60–70% relative humidity and 12 h photoperiod. Seedlings at the two-true-leaf growth stage and having relatively similar heights were used in all in vivo trials.
Pathogen isolation and culture
The three A. rolfsii isolates used in the current study were originally recovered from artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) stems showing typical Southern Blight symptoms (Sr1) and potato tubers exhibiting severe soft rots (Sr2 and Sr3). They were identified and characterized based on their pathogenic and biological traits in our previous investigations [47, 48]. The most virulent isolate (Sr1) was selected for the in vitro bioassays and a consortium of the three isolates (at 1:1:1 ratio) was used for the in vivo trials [49]. Isolates were grown for 7 days on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium and incubated at 30 °C in the dark [48] before use. Pathogen stock cultures were maintained on PDA slants at 4 °C until use.
Pathogen inoculum was produced by growing each isolate on sand corn-meal medium composed of 1000 g of air-dried clean sharp sand, 200 g of yellow corn meal, and 300 ml of sterile distilled water [50]. Mycelial plugs (6 mm in diameter), removed from 7-day-old cultures, were suspended into 500 ml Erlenmeyer flasks (15 plugs per flask) containing an autoclaved mixture of 200 g of sand corn-meal medium. The inoculated medium was incubated at 30 °C in the dark for 20 days and shaken daily during the first 7 days to ensure uniform pathogen growth.
Isolation and growth conditions of compost-associated actinomycetes
Composts C3 (derived from 70% cattle and 25% chicken manures mixed with 5% green waste; Chemical characteristics: pH: 7, EC: 5.22 ms/cm, OM: 43.4%, N: 1.43%, P: 0.05%, K: 1.29%, Ca: 2.76%, Na: 0.45%) and C4 (issued from 70% cattle, 25% sheep manures and 5% olive-mill solid waste mixture; Chemical characteristics: pH: 7.1, EC: 3.6ms/cm, OM: 42.8%, N:1.82%, P: 0.06%, K: 1.2%, Ca: 3.39%, Na: 0.44%), selected in a previous study based on their interesting antifungal activity against A. rolfsii and their high plant growth-promoting ability [48], were used for actinomycetes isolation. A collection of 17 actinomycetes isolates, exhibiting various macro-morphological traits, was recovered on Actinomycetes Isolation Agar medium cultures and grown on Yeast Malt Agar (ISP-2). Eleven isolates were previously screened for their seedling growth-promoting and biocontrol potentialities against A. rolfsii at the nursery stage [51].
Cell suspensions and cell-free culture filtrates preparation
All actinomycetes isolates were separately transferred to 50 ml of ISP-2 liquid medium poured into 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks. The actinomycetes cultures were incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 3 days under continuous shaking at 200 rpm [52]. The optical density (OD) from obtained cell suspensions was determined using a spectrophotometer (JENWAY 7205®) and converted to colonies count (CFU/ml) by a calibration curve. A curve was prepared by counting living cells number (CFU/ml) using the serial dilution method in function of OD of cell growth at 600 nm.
Actinomycetes suspensions were further centrifuged thrice at 10.000 rpm for 10 min. The cell-free culture filtrates were collected following supernatant filtration through a membrane with 0.22 μm pore size [53]. ISP-2 liquid filtrate was used as control treatment.
Hypersensitivity test
Hypersensitivity test was carried out on tobacco seedlings (Nicotiana tabacum). Cell suspension (~ 108 cells/ml, 10 µl) was injected to apparently healthy leaves using a microsyringe. Negative control leaves were injected with an equal volume of sterile distilled water. Tobacco seedlings (uninoculated and inoculated) were maintained for 24 h under ambient room conditions (~ 26 °C). The formation of necrotic and/or chlorotic zones on the inoculated leaf areas indicated positive response and isolate used for inoculation was considered as phytopathogenic and excluded from further biocontrol investigations [54].
Screening for plant growth-promoting ability
Cell suspensions and cell-free culture filtrates of a set of 11 actinomycete isolates were assessed for their ability to promote tomato cv. Rio Grande growth. Treatments were carried out by soaking seedling (at two-true-leaf stage) roots for 30 min into cell suspensions (~ 108 CFU/ml) or their cell-free filtrates before being transferred to plastic pots containing commercialized peat (12.5 cm × 14.5 cm). Supplementary treatments were performed by substrate drench with 25 ml of cell suspension or 10 ml of culture filtrate at the three time points i.e. immediately, at 15 and 30 days post-planting (DPP). Control seedlings were similarly treated using sterile distilled water only. All seedlings (treated and untreated) were maintained under the similar greenhouse conditions detailed above and watered regularly with tap water. Ten seedlings were used per individual treatment. Seedlings were arranged according to a completely randomized design and the whole experiment was repeated at least twice.
At 45 DPP, tomato plants were uprooted and gently washed under running water to remove the adhering peat before recording the different growth parameters (plant height, stem diameter, aerial part and root dry weights).
Screening for stem rot suppression ability
The ability of cell suspensions and cell-free culture filtrates to suppress A. rolfsii-induced disease was evaluated on tomato seedlings grown under the same conditions as indicated above. The consortium of the three A. rolfsii isolates, prepared as described above, was mixed thoroughly with additional clean sharp sand at 5% (w/w), and spread onto the top 2-cm depth of the growing substrate [49]. Tomato seedlings were carefully removed from the alveolated trays, soaked (roots only) for 30 min into cell suspensions (~ 108 CFU/ml) or their cell-free filtrates, and further transplanted into plastic pots (12.5 × 14.5 cm) previously filled with commercialized peat. They were substrate-drenched with 25 ml of cell suspensions or 10 ml of cell-free filtrates at three time points as the abovementioned test. Uninoculated and inoculated controls were watered with the same volume of sterile distilled water, and watered later regularly with tap water. The bioassay was carried out using ten seedlings per individual treatment.
At 45 DPP, growth parameters (plant height, stem diameter, aerial part dry weight, and root dry weight) were measured. Disease severity was scored based on 1–5 rating scale where 1 = no stem lesion, 2 = lesions girdled ≤ 25% of the stem circumference, 3 = lesions girdled 26–50% of the stem circumference, 4 = lesions girdled > 51% of the stem circumference, and 5 = stem completely girdled [51]. The whole experiment was repeated at least twice.
Screening for the antifungal activity of the selected isolates of actinomycetes
Test of cell suspensions effects
Actinomycete isolates were evaluated for their antifungal potential toward A. rolfsii (Sr1) using the dual culture technique [51]. Two agar plugs (6 mm in diameter), cut from 7-day-old actinomycete colonies growing on ISP-2 agar medium, were placed on opposite sides of Petri plates (90 mm in diameter), equidistantly 3 cm away from the centre, on PDA medium amended with streptomycin sulphate (300 mg/l w/v). After incubation at 28 ± 2 °C for 5 days, a fungal plug (6 mm in diameter) was deposed in the centre of the plate. PDA plates without actinomycete plugs served as control. All plates were incubated in the dark at 28 ± 2 °C until pathogen mycelium reached the edge of the plate in control cultures. Ten replicate plates were used per each treatment. Percentage growth inhibition of A. rolfsii radial growth was calculated according to the following formula:
Growth inhibition (%) = [(Dc– Dt) / Dc] x 100.
where Dc is the diameter of pathogen colony in control plates and Dt is the diameter of pathogen colony in treated plates.
Test of cell-free culture filtrates effects
The cell-free culture filtrates of each actinomycete isolate were aseptically injected at the concentration of 20% (v/v) into Petri plates containing molten PDA medium amended with streptomycin sulphate (300 mg/lw/v). This concentration was preliminarily chosen as being effective against A. rolfsii mycelial growth compared to other concentrations tested (Table S1). After medium solidification, a mycelial plug (6 mm in diameter), removed from the edge of 7-day-old A. rolfsii cultures, was deposited in the centre of each treated Petri plate. Ten replicate plates were used for each individual treatment. Fungal cultures were incubated in the dark at 30 °C until the pathogen covered the whole control plates [53]. The colony diameters were measured and the inhibition rate of pathogen growth was noted as described above. All the experiment was repeated twice.
Plant growth-promoting (PGP) features of the selected isolates of actinomycetes
Indole 3-acetic acid (IAA) production
IAA production ability was tested using the colorimetric method after growing each isolate in yeast malt broth medium amended with 0.2% L-tryptophan at 28 °C for 2 days under rotary shaking at 125 rpm [55]. After centrifugation at 11,000 rpm for 15 min, 2 ml of Salkowski reagent were added to 1 ml of culture supernatant. Treatments were performed in triplicate. Absorbance was read at 530 nm. IAA concentration was determined based on a standard curve performed from IAA dilution series at 100 µg/ml (w/v) in ethanol.
Phosphate and zinc solubilization abilities
Phosphate and zinc solubilization abilities were determined according to Anusree and Bhai [55] protocol onto Pikovskya agar and mineral salt agar medium added with 0.1% of insoluble zinc oxide, respectively. The test was performed in triplicate. After 15 days of incubation at 28 °C, the clearing zone formed around colonies was noted.
Nitrogen fixation
Nitrogen fixation was qualitatively evaluated according to Gayathri et al. [56] method. The positive nitrogen fixation ability expressed by the capacity of each isolate to grow onto nitrogen (N)-free agar medium such as Jensen’s agar medium after 15 days of incubation at 28 °C. The test was performed in triplicate.
Antifungal potential features of the selected isolates of actinomycetes
Production of siderophores
Production of siderophores was determined on Chromium AzurolS (CAS) agar medium according to Anusree and Bhai [55] protocol. The test was performed in triplicate. After 10 days of incubation at 28 °C, the clearing zone formed around colonies showing color change from dark blue to yellow-orange was noted.
Production of hydrogen cyanide (HCN)
Production of HCN was determined qualitatively onto Yeast Malt Agar (YMA) medium amended with glycin (4.4 g / l) where any change in color from yellow to light-reddish brown indicated a positive HCN production after 10 days of incubation at 28 °C [57]. Treatments were performed in triplicate.
Production of hydrolytic enzymes
Isolates of actinomyctes were qualitatively checked for their ability to produce proteases, chitinases, amylases, pectinases, and lipases when grown onto skim-milk (3% v/v), chitin- (0.5% w/v), starch- (0.5% w/v), pectin- (0.5% w/v) and Tween 80- (1% v/v) agar media, respectively [58]. Treatments were performed in triplicate.
Molecular identification of the most active isolates of actinomycetes
Molecular identification was undertaken after extraction of the genomic DNA of the selected actinomycetes isolates according to Errakhiet al. [59] protocol. Primers used to amplify the 16S rDNA gene were 1F (5’-TCACGGAGAGTTTGATCCTG-3’) and 1530R (5’-AAGGAGGTGWTCCARCC-3’) [60]. Amplification was performed by an automatic Thermocycler (GeneAmp PCR system 2700, Applied Biosystems) programmed as follows: denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min for one cycle, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 53 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 1 min and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. A negative control without DNA was included in each PCR run. The amplified products were visualized in a 1% agarose gel, stained with Ethidium bromide. The PCR products were purified and sequenced in the Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax (Laboratory of Biopesticides).
The homology of the 16 S rDNA sequences of eight selected actinomycetes isolates was performed, using BLAST-N program from GenBank database (http://ncbi.nlm.gov/BLAST/).
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software for Windows version 20.0. All in vitro and in vivo experiments were repeated at least twice. As no significant interactions were noted between tested treatments and experiments, one representative trial of each experiment was reported in the current study. Data were arranged in a completely randomized design. Means were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range tests at P ≤ 0.05. Correlations between stem rot severity and tomato growth parameters were determined based on the bivariate Pearson’s test at P ≤ 0.05.
Results
Stem rot suppression potential of compost-associated actinomycetes
Variance analysis revealed a significant (at P ≤ 0.05) decrease in stem rot severity, noted on 45 DPP, depending on actinomycetes treatments whether applied as whole cell suspensions or cell-free culture filtrates.
Tomato plants treated with A5-3, A2-4, A3-4, A4-4, and A5-4 isolates showed 37.5 to 56.2% decrease in disease severity as compared to pathogen-inoculated and untreated control, with A5-3 being the most effective isolate. Interestingly, plants treated with A5-3, A3-4, and A4-4 isolates were comparable to the untreated and uninoculated controls (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1.
Effects of compost-associated actinomycetes isolates (a) and their cell-free culture filtrates (b) on stem rot severity noted on tomato cv. Rio Grande plants 45 days post-planting as compared to controls. NIC: Uninoculated control; IC: Inoculated with A. rolfsii. Results are presented as mean ± SE (n = 10, P ≤ 0.05). Disease severity rating scale: 1 = no stem lesion, 2 = lesions girdled ≤ 25% of the stem circumference, 3 = lesions girdled 26–50% of the stem circumference, 4 = lesions girdled > 51% of the stem circumference, and 5 = stem completely girdled. Bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test (at P ≤ 0.05)
All actinomycetes cell-free filtrates had suppressed disease severity by 25 to 56.2% relative to pathogen-inoculated and untreated control with those from A5-3, A3-4, A4-4, and A5-4 isolates being the most effective ones. Furthermore, plants already inoculated with pathogen and treated with these four filtrates showed similar health status as the untreated and uninoculated control ones (Fig. 1b).
Antifungal activities of actinomycete cell suspensions and cell-free culture filtrates
The diameter of A. rolfsii colonies varied significantly (at P ≤ 0.05) depending on actinomycetes isolates and their cell-free filtrates tested at 20% (v/v). The pathogen mycelial growth was reduced by 58.8–88% relative to control using their cell suspensions formulation (Table 1). A. rolfsii mycelial growth was lowered by 59-91.3% versus control using the eleven actinomycete cell-free filtrates.
Table 1.
Comparative antifungal activity of compost-associated actinomycetes cell suspensions and their cell-free culture filtrates toward Agroathelia rolfsii
| Actinomycetes treatments | A. rolfsii colony diameter (mm) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cell suspensions | Cell-free culture filtrates | |
| IC | 85 a | 83 ± 2.0 a |
| A3-3 | 33 ± 3.0 (61.1) bc | 27.67 ± 0.73 (66.6) c |
| A4-3 | 29 ± 2.0 (65.8) bcd | 22.6 ± 1.4 (72.6) bcd |
| A5-3 | 14.6 ± 1.4 (82.7) fg | 8.5 ± 0.5 (89.7) fg |
| A8-3 | 26.3 ± 0.8 (69.0) cd | 25.1 ± 1.6 (69.6) cd |
| A10-3 | 29.3 ± 2.3 (65.5) bcd | 21.3 ± 2.4 (74.3) bcd |
| A1-4 | 35.1 ± 1.8 (58.6) b | 34 ± 1.7 (59.0) b |
| A2-4 | 18.6 ± 0.4 (78.0) ef | 18.1 ± 0.8 (78.1) ef |
| A3-4 | 14.6 ± 0.3 (82.7) fg | 9.6 ± 1.20 (88.3) fg |
| A4-4 | 12.3 ± 1.4 (85.5) fg | 8 ± 1.0 (90.3) fg |
| A5-4 | 10.1 ± 0.4 (88.0) g | 7.1 ± 0.6 (91.3) g |
| A6-4 | 23.8 ± 3.3 (71.9) de | 22.3 ± 1.4 (73.1) de |
IC: Inoculated with A. rolfsii. Results are presented as mean ± SE (n = 10, P ≤ 0.05). For each column, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test (at P ≤ 0.05). Values in parentheses indicate the decrease (in %) of pathogen mycelial growth as compared to the untreated control
Treatments with A5-3, A2-4, A3-4, A4-4, and A5-4 cell suspensions or their cell-free filtrates were found to be the most effective treatments by inducing 78–88% and 78.1–91.3% decrease in pathogen growth, respectively, compared to control (Table 1).
Growth-promoting potential of compost-associated actinomycetes on A. rolfsii-inoculated tomato plants
ANOVA analysis revealed a significant variation (at P ≤ 0.05) in all tomato growth parameters measured (plant height, stem diameter, and aerial part and root dry weights) at 45 DPP depending on treatments tested whether as cell suspensions or cell-free culture filtrates.
All treatments, except A1-4 and A6-4 cell suspensions, had improved plant height by 12.9–32.7% over A. rolfsii-inoculated and untreated control, and exhibited similar height as disease-free and untreated controls. Moreover, A3-3, A5-3, A2-4, A3-4, A4-4, and A5-4 cell suspensions led to increments, by 12.6–33.0% over the untreated and inoculated control, in the stem diameter. The aerial part dry weight was also increased, by 16.4–89.0% over control, following treatments tested. The root dry weight was enhanced on treated tomato plants except those challenged with A6-4 cell suspension (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Growth-promoting potential of compost-associated actinomycetes isolates and their cell-free culture filtrates on tomato cv. Rio Grande plants inoculated with Agroathelia rolfsii noted 45 days post-planting as compared to controls. (a): Plant height; (b): Stem diameter; (c): Aerial part dry weight; (d): Root dry weight; NIC: Uninoculated control; IC: Inoculated with A. rolfsii. Results are presented as mean ± SE (n = 10, P ≤ 0.05). For each experiment, bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test (at P ≤ 0.05)
As for the effects of their cell-free filtrates, the plant height increase, relative to the untreated and inoculated control, ranged between 18.2 and 36.7% depending on tested treatments. The stem diameter was improved by 20.4–54.4% over control using the majority of cell-free filtrates tested, except those from A4-3, A10-3, A1-4 and A6-4 isolates. Plant treatments with the filtrates tested, except those of A6-4, led to 33.2–91.9% increase in the aerial dry weight over control. Root dry weight was also improved by 55.2 to 81.1% over control on tomato plants already infected with A. rolfsii and treated with A3-3, A4-3, A5-3, A2-4, A3-4, A4-4, and A5-4 filtrates (Fig. 2).
Overall, treatments with A5-3 and A5-4 exhibited the highest growth-promoting effects when applied as cell suspensions or as cell-free culture filtrates on pathogen-inoculated plants.
Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed that the decrease in stem rot severity led to an increment in plant growth parameters. In fact, the plant height, the stem diameter, and the aerial part and root dry weights were negatively correlated to stem rot severity either when applied as cell suspension (r = -0.410, P = 0.001; r = -0.599, P ≤ 0.01; r = -0.451, P ≤ 0.01; r = -0.509, P ≤ 0.01) or as cell-free culture filtrates (r = -0.347, P = 0.005; r = -0.425, P ≤ 0.01; r = -0.569, P ≤ 0.01; r = -0.583, P ≤ 0.01), respectively.
Growth-promoting potential of compost-associated actinomycetes on pathogen-free tomato plants
Analysis of variance revealed a significant variation (at P ≤ 0.05) in all tomato growth parameters noted 45 DPP depending on actinomycetes treatments tested either as cell suspensions or as cell-free culture filtrates.
The plant height was improved, by 12.9 and 13.2% over the untreated and pathogen-free control was achieved, respectively, following treatments with A2-4 and A5-4 cell suspensions. In the same way, the stem diameter was increased, by 10.3% over control, was recorded following treatment with A5-4 cells. Moreover, all actinomycetes treatments tested had induced increments in the aerial part dry weight estimated at 26.6–79.0% over control with the highest growth-promoting effects (64–79%) recorded on plants treated with A3-3, A5-3, A2-4, A3-4, A4-4, and A5-4 cell suspensions. These treatments had also increased the root dry weight by 32.7–48% over control (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Growth-promoting potential of compost-associated actinomycetes isolates and their cell-free culture filtrates recorded on tomato cv. Rio Grande pathogen-free plants 45 days post-planting. (a): Plant height; (b): Stem diameter; (c): Aerial part dry weight; (d): Root dry weight; NIC: Uninoculated control. Results are presented as mean ± SE (n = 10, P ≤ 0.05). For each experiment, bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test (at P ≤ 0.05)
As for the effects of the cell-free filtrates, only tomato plants treated with A2-4 and A5-4 filtrates showed increase in their height, by 19.6 and 15.3% over control, respectively. All filtrates tested had enhanced the aerial part dry weight of tomato plants by 26.3–93.3% over pathogen-free control. The root dry weight was also increased by 62.5 to 79.8% over control, following treatments with A3-3, A5-3, A2-4, A3-4, A4-4, and A5-4 cell-free filtrates. The highest growth-promoting effects were recorded on plants treated with A5-3, A3-4 and A4-4 cell-free filtrates (Fig. 3).
Identification of the most active actinomycetes isolates
The isolates tested were checked for their hypersensitivity reaction and were found to be negative for this test. The most effective isolates in reducing stem rot severity and/or promoting tomato growth were subjected to molecular identification. Blast-N analysis of six (06) sequenced 16 S rDNA gene identity of sequences indicated that 4 isolates (namely A5-3, A3-4, A4-4 and A5-4) were affiliated to Streptomyces genus, one isolate (namely A2-4) belonged to Saccharomonospora genus and one isolate (A3-3) was identified as a member of Micromonospora genus.
The isolates A3-4 and A4-4 were affiliated with 100% identical similarity to S. griseorubens K5, Streptomyces sp. NAr5, S. labedae AJR1, S. griseoflavus TY175-08, S. griseorubens QH12-10, S. variabilisDJ1, S. euryhalinus UAE1, S. althioticus NMR2, S. griseoincarnatusEPE48, S. viridodiastaticus sh15, S. tunisiensis AI, S. coelicolor NIOT_ MBCTS80 and to the two type strains Streptomyces euryhalinus MS 3/20 and Streptomyces chartreusis NBRC 12,753 sequences. Both isolates A3-4 and A4-4 were identified as Streptomyces sp. The isolate A5-4 shared 100% identity to the type strain S. palmae CMU-AB204, S. youssoufiensis SNSAA03, S. lydicus HBERC-44,441, S. noursei Z1-04-02, S. albulus NJZJSA2, Streptomyces sp. JCM9888 and S. philanthi bv. triangulum 23Af2 sequences. This isolate A5-4 was identified as Streptomyces sp. The isolate A5-3 belonged to Streptomyces sp. with 100% of identity to S. thermogriseus BRM043931, S. thermovulgaris KSI, Streptomyces sp. BCC23167 and to the type strain S. thermogriseus NBRC 100,772 (Table 2).
Table 2.
Identification of the most active isolates of actinomycetes based on their 16 S rDNA sequences
| Isolate | Accession number | The size of sequenced region (bp) | Most related species | Sequence identity (%) | Isolate identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2-4 | OK043812 | 1145 |
Saccharomonospora sp. TH33 Saccharomonospora cyanea NA134 (type strain) |
100 99.91 |
Saccharomonospora sp. |
|
A3-4 and A4-4 |
and |
983 987 |
Streptomyces sp. NAr5 S. griseorubens K5 S. labedae AJR1 S. griseoflavus TY175-08 S. variabilis DJ1 S. euryhalinus UAE1 S. griseoincarnatus S. viridodiastaticus sh15 S. althioticus NMR2 S. tunisiensis AI S. coelicolor NIOT_ MBCTS80 S. euryhalinus MS 3/20 (type strain) S.chartreusis NBRC 12,753 (type strain) |
100 | Streptomyces sp. |
| A5-4 | OK043815 | 391 |
S. palmae CMU-AB204 (type strain) S. youssoufiensis SNSAA03 S. lydicus HBERC-44,441 S. noursei Z1-04-02 S. albulus NJZJSA2 Streptomyces sp. JCM9888 S. philanthi bv. triangulum 23Af2 |
100 | Streptomyces sp. |
| A3-3 | OK043816 | 373 |
Micromonospora rosaria S4BS6 Micromonospora sp. YIM 68,233 M. rosaria DSM 803 (type strain) |
100 | Micromonospora sp. |
| A5-3 | OK043817 | 1161 |
S. thermogriseus BRM043931 S. thermovulgaris KSI Streptomyces sp. BCC23167 S. thermogriseus NBRC 100,772 (type strain) |
100 | Streptomyces sp. |
The isolate A2-4 was identified as Saccharomonospora sp. with 100 and 99.91% of identity to Saccharomonospora sp. TH33 and the type strain Saccharomonospora cyanea NA134, respectively. The isolate A3-3 belonged to Micromonospora sp. with 100% of identity to Micromonospora rosaria S4BS6, Micromonospora sp. YIM 68,233 and the type strain M. rosaria DSM 803 (Table 2).
Sequences of A2-4, A3-4, A4-4, A5-4, A3-3 and A5-3 were submitted to GenBank and attributed the following accession numbers OK043812 to OK043817, respectively.
Plant growth-promoting traits of the selected actinomycetes isolates
Production of IAA
The 11 selected isolates of actinomycetes were found able to produce the IAA after 48 h of incubation. The IAA production varied significantly from 3.03 to 41.8 µg/ml. The highest IAA production, of about 41.8 µg/ml, was recorded on A8-3 culture, followed by Streptomyces sp. A3-4 (22.8 µg/ml), then Streptomyces sp. A5-3 and A1-4 (14.9–15.6 µg/ml), and Saccharomonospora sp. A2-4 (14.1 µg/ml). The remaining isolates were found able to produce IAA at 12.2 to 3.03 µg/ml (Table 3).
Table 3.
Plant growth-promoting traits and antifungal activity features of the selected isolates of actinomycetes
| Isolates of actinomycetes | A3-3 | A4-3 | A5-3 | A8-3 | A10-3 | A1-4 | A2-4 | A3-4 | A4-4 | A5-4 | A6-4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant growth-promoting features | |||||||||||
| Production of IAA (µg/ml) | 2.1 ± 0.6 e | 6.6 ± 2.4 cde | 14.9 ± 3.3 bc | 41.8 ± 4.7 a | 3.6 ± 1.2 de | 15.6 ± 2.4 bc | 14.1 ± 2.3 bcd | 22.8 ± 1.5 b | 3 ± 0.8 de | 9.1 ± 1.2 cde | 12.2 ± 0.7 bcde |
| Solubilization of phosphate (mm) | 0 | 0 | 8.8 ± 0.8 c | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.8 ± 3.3 a | 17.5 ± 0.1 b | 0 |
| Solubilization of zinc (mm) | 6.3 ± 0.1 c | 7.3 ± 0.3 c | 7 ± 0.2 c | 0 | 0 | 9.8 ± 1.2 b | 0 | 6.8 ± 0.3 c | 23.8 ± 0.8 a | 0 | 6.6 ± 0.3 c |
| Fixation of nitrogen | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | - |
| Antifungal activity features | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siderophores activity (mm) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47.5 ± 1.9 a | 0 | 50.5 ± 3 a | 0 | 0 |
| Production of HCN | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | - | + |
| Enzymatic activity (mm) | |||||||||||
| Chitinase activity | 8.2 ± 0.1 d | 17 ± 0.2 c | 34.1 ± 0.2 a | 0 | 18 ± 0.2 c | 9.3 ± 0.1 d | 0 | 23 ± 0.1 b | 22 ± 0.2 b | 35.6 ± 0.3 a | 8.5 ± 0.1 d |
| Proteolytic activity | 33.6 ± 0.1 c | 33.8 ± 0.1 c | 42.8 ± 0.2 a | 0 | 34.6 ± 0.2 c | 0 | 0 | 38.6 ± 0.1 b | 38.6 ± 0.2 b | 43.6 ± 0.2 a | 10.6 ± 0.2 d |
| Lipase activity | 8.1 ± 0.1 | 14.5 ± 0.1 | 31.3 ± 0.1 | 0 | 18 ± 0.2 | 9.6 ± 0.1 | 0 | 20.8 ± 0.2 | 23.8 ± 0.2 | 32.5 ± 0.2 | 0 |
| Amylase activity | 7.8 ± 0.1 cd | 14.8 ± 0.1 bc | 28.6 ± 0.3 a | 0 | 16 ± 0.1 bc | 21 ± 0.7 ab | 5.5 ± 0.1 d | 20.6 ± 0.2 ab | 19 ± 0.1 abc | 21.3 ± 0.3 ab | 8.3 ± 0.1 cd |
| Pectinolytic activity | 7.1 ± 0.1 d | 18.8 ± 0.2 bc | 32.8 ± 0.2 a | 6.3 ± 0.1 d | 16.6 ± 0.2 c | 6.1 ± 0.1 d | 6.8 ± 0.1 d | 20.6 ± 0.3 bc | 24.5 ± 0.2 bc | 25 ± 0.5 b | 7.5 ± 0.1 d |
A3-3: Micromonospora sp. A3-3; A5-3: Streptomyces sp. A5-3; A2-4: Saccharomonospora sp. A2-4; A3-4: Streptomyces sp. A3-4; A4-4: Streptomyces sp. A4-4; A5-4: Streptomyces sp. A5-4; A4-3, A8-3, A10-3, A1-4 and A6-4: Unidentified isolates of actinomycetes. IAA: Indole 3-acetic acid. HCN: Hydrogen cyanide. +: Presence of activity. -: Absence of activity. Results are presented as mean ± SE (n = 10, P ≤ 0.05). For each column, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test (at P ≤ 0.05)
Solubilization of phosphate
Three (03) isolates of actinomycetes namely Streptomyces sp. A5-3, Streptomyces sp. A5-4 and Streptomyces sp. A4-4 were shown able to solubilize the phosphate as determined by the formation of a clear zone of about 8.8, 17.5 and 26.8 mm in diameter around their colonies, respectively. The highest phosphate solubilization ability was noted on Streptomyces sp. A4-4 cultures (Table 3).
Solubilization of zinc
Seven (07) isolates (namely A3-3, A4-3, A5-3, A1-4,A3-4, A4-4, and A6-4) were found able to solubilize the zinc as determined by the formation of clear zones, of 6.3 to 23.8 mm in diameter, around their colonies. The highest zinc solubilization activity was noted on Streptomyces sp. A4-4 cultures (Table 3).
Fixation of nitrogen
Three isolates namely Streptomyces sp. A3-4, Streptomyces sp. A5-4 and Micromonospora sp. A3-3 were found able to fix nitrogen as expressed by their capacity to grow on nitrogen free medium (Table 3).
Antifungal activity features of the selected actinomycetes isolates
Production of siderophores
Only Saccharomonospora sp. A2-4 and Streptomyces sp. A4-4 strains were shown able to produce siderophores as determined by the formation of clearing yellow-orange zone of about 47.5 and 50.5 mm in diameter around their colonies (Table 3).
Production of HCN
Two isolates belonging to Streptomyces sp. (namely A4-4 and A5-3) and three unidentified isolates of actinomycetes (A1-4, A6-4 and A4-3) were shown able to modify the filter paper color from yellow to light-reddish color thus indicating their positive HCN production potential when grown on yeast malt agar medium amended with glycin (Table 3).
Enzymatic activity
As for chitinase production, 9 isolates out of the eleven tested (except Saccharomonospora sp. A2-4 and the isolate A8-3 of actinomycete), displayed positive activity. The greatest activity was displayed by Streptomyces sp. A5-3 and Streptomyces sp. A5-4 cultures, where the clear zone formed around their colonies reached 34.1 and 35.6 mm in diameter (Table 3). Eight (8) isolates displayed proteolytic activity when grown on skim milk-agar medium. The highest production of proteases was noted on Streptomyces sp. A5-3 and Streptomyces sp. A5-4 cultures where the clear zones formed around their colonies were around 42.8 mm and 43.6 mm in diameter, respectively (Table 3). As for lipase activity, 8 isolates showed clear zones around their colonies when cultured on tween 80-agar medium and were found to be lipase-producing agents. The highest lipase production was noted on Streptomyces sp. A5-3 and Streptomyces sp. A5-4 cultures (Table 3). Concerning amylase production, all isolates except the actinomycete isolate A8-3 displayed positive activity with the highest activity recorded on Streptomyces sp. A5-3 culture where clear zone formed around its colony was around 28 mm in diameter (Table 3). All isolates tested displayed pectinolytic activity when grown on pectin-agar medium with the greatest clear zone (of about 32.8 mm in diameter) noted on Streptomyces sp. A5-3 cultures (Table 3).
Discussion
Soilborne pathogens associated to various economically important crops including vegetables, fruit trees, and many others cause significant losses around the world [61]. To overcome these soil microorganisms, chemical pesticides have been widely used, but good agricultural practices were recently more focused on alternative control methods including soil solarization [62], biofumigation [63], biocontrol [19, 64], and organic amendments such as composts [24].
The disease-suppressive effect displayed by composts is mainly related to the biological activity of their associated microbiota colonizing their organic matter [22–25, 65]. Among the widely compost-associated microbial agents, actinomycetes were the main driving forces for plant diseases suppression [29]. In a previous study, we demonstrated the ability of different composts to control A. rolfsii growth. However, the present investigation was more focused on the valorization of actinomycetes agents derived from the most disease-suppressive composts as potential growth-promoting and biocontrol agents.
In fact, eleven actinomycetes isolates were recovered from the most active composts and screened for their abilities to control stem rot disease and to promote growth of tomato seedlings in preliminary investigation. In the present study, the actinomycetes isolates, found to be the most bioactive in suppressing stem rot disease and/or in promoting tomato plant growth, were identified by 16 S rDNA sequencing as Micromonospora sp. A3-3 (OK043816), Streptomyces sp. A5-3 (OK043817), Saccharomonospora sp. A2-4 (OK043812), Streptomyces sp. A3-4 (OK043813), Streptomyces sp. A4-4 (OK043814), and Streptomyces sp. A5-4 (OK043815).
Stem rot disease severity was reduced using the cell-free cultures filtrates of all tested isolates with the highest disease-suppressive effect obtained using Streptomyces sp. (A5-3 A3-4, A4-4 and A5-4). The application of whole cells of Streptomyces and its partially purified crude metabolites reduced stem rot incidence by 64–67% and 22–49%, respectively [66]. These results confirmed other studies reporting the antagonistic potential of actinomycetes against stem rot caused by A. rolfsii, foot rot induced by Phytophthora capsici [55], apple fruit associated to Botryosphaeria dothidea, tomato Fusarium wilt induced by F. Oxysporum [67], and Verticillium wilt due to V. dahliae [68]. Several other reports indicated the use of actinobacteria for the biological control of various fungal and bacterial plant pathogens [26, 67]. The antagonistic effects of actinomycetes have been attributed mainly to their antifungal compounds [69]. In fact, the antifungal ability of actinomycetes suspensions and their cell-free culture filtrates was undoubtedly demonstrated on pathogen mycelial growth which decreased by 58.8–88% and 59-91.3% over control, respectively, with A5-3, A3-4, A4-4, A5-4 (Streptomyces sp.) and A2-4 (Saccharomonospora sp.) being the most active agents. Similar findings were described for various actinomycetes isolates able to inhibit (A) rolfsii radial growth via the formation an inhibition zone [55]. Liotti et al. [70] demonstrated the potential of some actinomycetes isolates to inhibit various pathogens including (B) dothidea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, (C) guaranicola, F. decemcellulare, and F. oxysporum.
In the current study, the ability of cell suspensions and cell-free culture filtrates from the tested actinomycetes isolates to promote tomato growth was investigated on A. rolfsii-inoculated plants. Isolates A5-3, A3-4, A4-4, A5-4 (Streptomyces sp.) and A2-4 (Saccharomonospora sp.) and their cell-free filtrates were found to be the the most effective in enhancing plant growth over the untreated and inoculated control. An important effect was also noted on tomato plants treated with Micromonospora sp. A3-3 isolate and its filtrate. Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that the reduced stem rot severity was related to the significant increment in all plant growth parameters. Goudjal et al. [71] also selected various endophytic actinomycetes for their plant growth promotion features and biocontrol activity against F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. These findings are in accordance with other reports mentioning the ability of actinomycetes to improve plant growth [67, 72] and to control several plant pathogens [38, 73]. Different mechanisms and interactions involved in the plant disease suppression by actinomycetes acting either individually or synergistically are (i) pathogen inhibition using antimicrobial substances [33, 73], (ii) competition for colonization nutrients and sites supplied by roots [18], (iii) iron competition through production of siderophores [38, 74], (iv) induction of defence mechanisms [19, 75], (vi) degradation of pathogenicity factors of the pathogen such as toxins and extracellular cell wall-degrading enzymes [76], (v) inactivation of pathogen germination factors in root exudates [77].
The enhancement of plant growth by the tested actinomycetes cell suspensions and their cell-free culture filtrates were also reported in the present work when they were applied to pathogen-free tomato plants. Isolates A5-3, A3-4, A4-4, A5-4 (Streptomyces sp.), A2-4 (Saccharomonospora sp.), and Micromonospora sp. A3-3 and their cell-free culture filtrates showed their significant ability to improve growth parameters compared to the uninoculated and untreated control. In several reports, plant growth-promoting potentialities of actinomycetes have been also demonstrated [78, 79]. Plant growth-promoting actinobacteria are also able to decrease the soilborne disease severity and to benefit the plant growth [80]. They directly favour the plant development by providing nutrients (P, N, Fe) and synthesizing hormones (ethylene and indole-3-acetic acid) [79], as well as indirectly by protecting plants from biotic and abiotic stresses [81].
It should be mentioned that the genus Streptomyces was predominant, and the potent isolates selected in the current study belonged to this genus. Streptomyces spp. are known to be one of the main sources of bioactive natural products [18]. The genus accounts for about 80% of the production of natural substances by actinobacteria [82], and 60% of agricultural importance compounds are originated from Streptomyces species [83] which have been recorded to inhibit the growth of various fungal plant pathogens [66, 70]. Furthermore, different studies highlight the capability of Micromonospora sp. to improve plant growth via phosphate-solubilization and N-fixation [84, 85] with an antipathogenic effect through the production of cell-wall-degrading enzymes [86]. Nevertheless, Saccharomonospora has been considered as a rare genus in the phylum of actinobacteria and sparsely studied [87].
Actinobacteria display direct and indirect mechanisms for the improvement of plant growth. As for their direct mechanisms, they can enhance the availability of nutrients and produce phytohormones [88]. Nevertheless, through the indirect pathway, they have the capacity to produce hydrogen cyanide acids (HCN), siderophore, protease, and cellulase [22]. As for their effect on plant defence against plant pathogens, actinomycetes are able to produce antifungal compounds and antibiotics [69], hydrolytic enzymes such as β-1,3-glucanase [89] and chitinase [90]. In the current study, all the actinomycetes isolates were shown able to produce IAA with a highest production for A8-3 isolate, followed by Streptomyces sp. A3-4, then Streptomyces sp. A1-4 and Streptomyces sp. A5-3, and Saccharomonospora sp. A2-4. This phytohormone regulates different basic cellular processes including cell division, differentiation and elongation [29]. Therefore, several Streptomyces species, such as S. rimosus, S. viridis, S. olivaceoviridis, have the ability to produce IAA and to improve plant growth by increasing seed germination, root elongation, and root dry weight [84, 91]. Moreover, only Streptomyces sp. A5-3, Streptomyces sp. A5-4 and Streptomyces sp. A4-4 were phosphate producers with a marked phosphatase activity for Streptomyces sp. A4-4. They increase the phosphorus accessibility to plants through many processes like chelation, mineralization of organic phosphorus, and redox changes [92]. Some actinomycetes species such as S. griseus and M. aurantiaca are shown able to improve the growth of wheat plants due to increased N and P contents of the tissues as a result of their phosphate solubilizing activities [93]. Furthermore, Streptomyces sp. A3-4, Streptomyces sp. A5-4 and Micromonospora sp. A3-3 were shown able to fix nitrogen. Other actinomycetes species exhibit a nitrogen-fixing ability including Frankia, Agromyces, and Mycobacterium [39, 94]. Moreover, seven isolates (A3-3, A4-3, A5-3, A1-4, A3-4, A4-4, and A6-4) were found able to solubilize the zinc with the highest zinc solubilization activity displayed by Streptomyces sp. A4-4. Poovarasan et al. [95] reported the role of actinomycetes especially Streptomyces sp. in zinc solubilization and their association with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Some actinobacteria species are able to produce low molecular weight compounds named siderophores which are capable of sequestering Fe3 and other metals and influence their availability to plants [96]. In the current study, only Saccharomonospora sp. A2-4 and Streptomyces sp. A4-4 were found able to produce siderophores. Moreover, siderophores help for antagonistic activity by depriving the iron availability to the pathogens [96]. Siderophores such as peucechelin were produced by S. peucetius, desferrioxamine B by S. pilosus, and desferrioxamine E by S. coelicolor [97]. Streptomyces sp. A4-4 and A5-3 isolates and A1-4, A6-4 and A4-3 isolates showed positive HCN production; this compound is known to act through the inhibition of electron transport and thus energy supply disruption to the cells [81]. The HCN activity for plant disease control was also reported in Boukaew et al. [98] and Wang et al. [99] studies.
Actinomycetes are of huge importance since they possess a capacity to secrete a variety of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes [100]. Multiple enzymatic activities were recorded for Streptomyces sp. A5-3 and Streptomyces sp. A5-4 cultures synthesizing the highest levels of chitinase, protease and lipase. Furthermore, the highest amylolytic activity was noted on Streptomyces sp. A5-3 cultures. The extracellular enzyme activities are not only helpful in plant growth-promoting and organic matter decomposition, but they also play a crucial role in plant disease suppression by antagonizing soilborne phytopathogens and facilitating development of endophytic and intracellular colonization [101]. The hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinase, protease, amylase, lipase, and pectinase are capable to control plant diseases by degrading the fungal cell walls, cell membranes, and cell membrane proteins, and by decreasing the activity of extracellular virulence factors [102].
In conclusion, the screening for a set of actinomycetes isolates recovered from two composts exhibiting antifungal potential against A. rolfsii led to the selection of six promising biocontrol agents useful for stem rot control and for the improvement of tomato growth. Thus, composts, having different proportions of raw materials, were found to be a potentially crucial source for the isolation of potent actinobacteria. In the current investigation, we identified various species such as Streptomyces sp. A5-3, Saccharomonospora sp. A2-4, Streptomyces sp. A3-4, Streptomyces sp. A4-4, Streptomyces sp. A5-4 and Micromonospora sp. A3-3 as potential biocontrol agents and plant growth-promoting actinobacteria. Their ability to produce hydrolytic enzymes, HCN, siderophores and IAA, to solubilize phosphate and zinc and to fix the nitrogen were demonstrated. Therefore, these efficient actinomycetes isolates, acting both as biocontrol agents and biostimulants, may be potentially valorized in an integrated disease management program for stem rot in tomato.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Tunisia through the funding allocated to the Research Laboratory LR21AGR03-Production and Protection for a Sustainable Horticulture (2PHD), Regional Research Centre on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture of Chott-Mariem, University of Sousse, Tunisia. Authors would like to thank Mr. Aymen Youssef for his valuable technical assistance.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. FA conducted the experiment and wrote the manuscript. RABA contributed in the isolation of compost-associated actinobacteria isolates, analysis of the secondary metabolites and of the 16 S rDNA gene sequences and the revision of the manuscript. SBK identified the selected actinomycetes isolates. HJK contributed in data collection and data analysis. MDR supervised the experiments and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The research leading to these results received funding from the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Tunisia through the budget assigned to LR21AGR03-Production and Protection for a Sustainable Horticulture (2PHD), The Regional Research Centre on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture, University of Sousse, 4042, Chott-Mariem, Tunisia.
Declarations
Ethical responsibility
All authors confirm that the manuscript is original and has not been submitted or published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full). This work is an expansion of previous work published in Journal of Phytopathology and Pest Management (http://ppmj.net/index.php/ppmj/article/view/202).
Financial interests
The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Katan J (2017) Diseases caused by soilborne pathogens: biology, management and challenges. J Plant Pathol 99(2):305–315. 10.4454/jpp.v99i2.3862 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ünal F, Aşkın A, Koca E, Yıldırır M, Bingöl MÜ (2019) Mycelial compatibility groups, pathogenic diversity and biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii on turfgrass. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 29:44. 10.1186/s41938-019-0144-6 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ndifon EM (2024) Integrated disease management, combining chemical and bio-control agents, is effective against Agroathelia rolfsii infecting eggplants. Int J Food Agr Nat Res 05(03):69–75. 10.46676/ij-fanres.v5i3.361 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mahadevakumar S, Yadav V, Tehaswini GS, Janardhana GR (2016) Morphological and molecular characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii associated with fruit rot of Cucurbita maxima. Eur J Plant Pathol 145:215–219. 10.1007/s10658-015-0818-1 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sun S, Sun F, Deng D, Zhu X, Duan C, Zhu Z (2020) First report of Southern blight of mung bean caused by Sclerotium rolfsii in China. Crop Prot 130:105055. 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105055 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Paramasivan M, Mohan S, Muthukrishnan N, Chandrasekaran A (2013) Degradation of oxalic acid (OA) producing Sclerotium rolfsii (Sacc.) by organic biocides. Arch PhytopatholPflanzenschutz 46(3):357–363. 10.1080/03235408.2012.740983 [Google Scholar]
- 7.7, Punja ZK (1985) The biology, ecology and control of Sclerotium rolfsii. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23:97–127. 10.1146/annurev.py.23.090185.000525 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhong J, Chen D, Zhu HJ, Gao BD, Zhou Q (2016) Hypovirulence of Sclerotium rolfsii caused by associated RNA mycovirus. Front Microbiol 7:1798. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alam K, Alam M, Islam R, Khan M, Islam M (2018) Yield loss assessment and management of foot rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) of Bush bean. Bangladesh J Agric Res 43(2):289–299. 10.3329/bjar.v43i2.37332 [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paparu P, Acur A, Kato F, Acam C, Nakibuule J, Musoke S, Nkalubo S, Mukankusi C (2018) Prevalence and incidence of four common bean root rots in Uganda. Exp Agric 54:888–900. 10.1017/S0014479717000461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu Z, Gleason ML, Mueller DS, Esker PD, Bradley CA, Buck JW, Benson DM, Dixon PM, Monteiro JEBA (2008) Overwintering of sclerotium rolfsii and S. rolfsii Var. Delphinii in different latitudes of the united States. Plant Dis 92:719–724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sridharan AP, Sugitha T, Karthikeyan G, Sivakumar U (2020) Comprehensive profiling of the VOCs of Trichoderma longibrachiatum EF5 while interacting with Sclerotium rolfsii and Macrophomina Phaseolina. Microbiol Res 236:126436. 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Singh SP, Singh HB, Singh DK (2013) Trichoderma Harzianum and Pseudomonas Sp. mediated management of Sclerotium rolfsii rot in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Bioscan 8:801–804 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rajani P, Aiswarya H, Vasanthakumari MM, Jain SK, Bharate SB, Rajasekaran C, Ravikanth G, Uma Shaanker R (2019) Inhibition of the collar rot fungus, Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. By an endophytic fungus Alternaria Sp.: implications for biocontrol. Plant Physiol Rep 24:521–532. 10.1007/s40502-019-00484-6 [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ram RM, Rajput RS, Vaishnav A (2020) Management of Sclerotium rolfsii induced diseases in crops by Trichoderma species. In: Sharma SK, Singh UB, Sahu PK, Singh HV, Sharma PK (eds) Rhizosphere microbes. Microorganisms for sustainability, 23edn edn. Springer, Singapore, pp 593–617. 10.1007/978-981-15-9154-9_25 [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumari P, Bishnoi SK, Chandra S (2021) Assessment of antibiosis potential of Bacillus sp. against the soil-borne fungal pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. (Athelia rolfsii (Curzi) Tu & Kimbrough). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 31:17.10.1186/s41938-020-00350-w
- 17.Lahlali R, Ezrari S, Radouane N, Kenfaoui J, Esmaeel Q, El Hamss H, Belabess Z, Barka EA (2022) Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms 10:596. 10.3390/microorganisms10030596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thakur P, Singh I (2018) Biocontrol of soilborne root pathogens: an overview. In: Giri B, Prasad R, Varma A (eds) Root biology. Soil biology, 52edn edn. Springer, Cham, pp 181–220. 10.1007/978-3-319-75910-4_7 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sahu PK, Singh S, Gupta A, Singh UB, Brahmaprakash GP, Saxena AK (2019) Antagonistic potential of bacterial endophytes and induction of systemic resistance against collar rot pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii in tomato. Biol Control 137:104014. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104014 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schlatter D, Kinkel L, Thomashow L, Weller D, Paulitz T (2017) Disease suppressive soils: new insights from the soil Microbiome. Phytopathology 107(11):1284–1297. 10.1094/PHYTO-03-17-0111-RVW [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jayaraman S, Naorem AK, Lal R, Dalal RC, Sinha NK, Patra AK, Chaudhari SK (2021) Disease-suppressive soils-beyond food production: a critical review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21(2):1437–1465. 10.1007/s42729-021-00451-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gopalakrishnan S, Pande S, Sharma M, Humayun P, Kiran BK, Sandeep D, Vidya MS, Deepthy K, Rupela O (2011) Evaluation of actinomycete isolates obtained from herbal vermicompost for biological control of fusarium wilt of Chickpea. Crop Prot 30:1070–1078. 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.006 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pane C, Spaccini R, Piccolo A, Celano G, Zaccardelli M (2019) Disease suppressiveness of agricultural green waste composts as related to chemical and bio-based properties shaped by different on-farm composting methods. Biol Control 137:104026. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104026 [Google Scholar]
- 24.De Corato U (2020a) Disease-suppressive compost enhances natural soil suppressiveness against soil-borne plant pathogens: A critical review. Rhizosphere 13:100192. 10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100192 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Coelho L, Reis M, Guerrero C, Dionísio L (2020) Use of organic composts to suppress bentgrass diseases in Agrostis stolonifera. Biol Control 141:104154. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104154 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mingma R, Pathom-aree W, Trakulnaleamsai S, Thamchaipenet A, Duangmal K (2014) Isolation of rhizospheric and roots endophytic actinomycetes from Leguminosae plant and their activities to inhibit soybean pathogen, Xanthomonas campestrispv. glycine. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:271–280. 10.1007/s11274-013-1451-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chaurasia A, Meena BR, Tripathi AN, PandeyKK, Rai AB, Singh B (2018) Actinomycetes: an unexplored microorganisms for plant growth promotion and biocontrol in vegetable crops. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34:132. 10.1007/s11274-018-2517-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gopalakrishnan S, Srinivas V (2019) Management of soil-borne diseases of grain legumes through broad-spectrum actinomycetes having plant prowth-promoting and biocontrol traits. In: Varma A, Tripathi S, Prasad R (eds) Plant microbe interface. Springer, Cham, pp 129–144. 10.1007/978-3-030-19831-2_5 [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bhatti AA, Haq S, Bhat RA (2017) Actinomycetes benefaction role in soil and plant health. MicrobPathog 11(1):458–467. 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.09.036 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 30.Das P, Singh SK, Singh P, Zeyad MT, Aamir M, Upadhyay RS (2021) Actinomycetes as biostimulants and their application in agricultural practices. In: White J, Kumar A, Droby S (eds) Microbiome stimulants for crops. Wood Head Publishing, pp 267–282. 10.1016/B978-0-12-822122-8.00021-2
- 31.Srivastava S, Patel JS, Singh HB, Sinha A, Sarma BK (2015) Streptomyces rochei SM3 induces stress tolerance in Chickpea against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and NaCl. J Phytopathol 163:583–592. 10.1111/jph.12358 [Google Scholar]
- 32.Figueiredo MDVB, Bonifacio A, Rodrigues AC, de Araujo FF, Stamford NP (2016) Beneficial microorganisms: current challenge to increase crop performance. In: Arora N, Mehnaz S, Balestrini R (eds) Bioformulations: for sustainable agriculture. Springer, New Delhi, pp 53–70. 10.1007/978-81-322-2779-3_3 [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jakubiec-Krzesniak K, Rajnisz-Mateusiak A, Guspiel A, Ziemska J, Solecka J (2018) Secondary metabolites of actinomycetes and their antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral properties. Pol J Microbiol 67(3):259–272. 10.21307/pjm-2018-048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shi L, Wu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Fang W, Wang Y, Wan Z, Wang K, Ke S (2020) Herbicidal secondary metabolites from actinomycetes: structure diversity, modes of action, and their roles in the development of herbicides. J Agric Food Chem 68(1):17–32. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Selim MSM, Abdelhamid SA, Mohamed SS (2021) Secondary metabolites and biodiversity of actinomycetes. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19:72. 10.1186/s43141-021-00156-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang D, Lu Y, Chen H, Wu C, Zhang H, Chen L, Chen X (2020) Antifungal peptides produced by actinomycetes and their biological activities against plant diseases. J Antibiot 73:265–282. 10.1038/s41429-020-0287-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sadeghi A, Karimi E, Dahazi PA, Javid MG, Dalvand Y, Askari H (2012) Plant growth promoting activity of an auxin and siderophore producing isolate of Streptomyces under saline soil condition. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1503–1509. 10.1007/s11274-011-0952-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Silva GC, Kitano IT, Ribeiro IAF, Lacava PT (2022) The potential use of actinomycetes as microbial inoculants and biopesticides in agriculture. Front Soil Sci 2:833181. 10.3389/fsoil.2022.833181 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bibha D, Githanjali N, Lora P, Volker SB (2017) Diversity of free-living nitrogen fixing Streptomyces in soils of the Badlands of South Dakota. Microbiol Res 195:31–39. 10.1016/j.micres.2016.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yang Y, Zhang SW, Li KT (2019) Antagonistic activity and mechanism of an isolated Streptomyces corchorusii stain AUH-1 against phytopathogenic fungi. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35(9):145. 10.1007/s11274-019-2720-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang L, Zhang H, Huang Y, Peng J, Xie J, Wang W (2021) Isolation and evaluation of rhizosphere actinomycetes with potential application F.r biocontrolling F.sarium wilt of banana caused by Fusarium oxysporum F. Sp. cubense tropical race 4. Front Microbiol 12:763038. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.763038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Goudjal Y, Toumatia O, Yekkour A, Sabaou N, Mathieu F, Zitouni A (2014) Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia Solani damping-off and promotion of tomato plant growth by endophytic actinomycetes isolated from native plants of Algerian Sahara? Microbiol Res 169(1):59–65. 10.1016/j.micres.2013.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cuesta G, García-de-la-Fuente R, Abad M, Fornes F (2012) Isolation and identification of actinomycetes from a compost-amended soil with potential as biocontrol agents. J Environ Manage 95:S280–S284. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cao P, Liu C, Sun P, Fu X, Wang S, Wu F, Wang X (2016) An endophytic Streptomyces Sp. strain DHV3-2 from diseased root as a potential biocontrol agent against Verticillium dahliae and growth elicitor in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 109:1573–1582. 10.1007/s10482-016-0758-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thampi A, Bhai RS (2017) Rhizosphere actinobacteria for combating Phytophthora capsici and Sclerotium rolfsii, the major soil borne pathogens of black pepper (Piper nigrum L). Biol Control 109:1–13. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.03.006 [Google Scholar]
- 46.El-Tarabily KA, Sivasithamparam K (2005) Non-streptomycete actinomycetes as biocontrol agents of soil-borne fungal plant pathogens and as plant growth promoters. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1505–1520. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.12.017 [Google Scholar]
- 47.Daami-Remadi M, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Sdiri A, El Mahjoub M (2010) Effect of temperature on Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth and rot severity on potato tubers. Afr J Plant Sci Biotechnol 4:54–58 [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ayed F, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Aydi-Ben-Abdallah R, Daami-Remadi M (2018) Effect of temperatures and culture media on Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth, sclerotial formation and germination. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 9(8):429. 10.4172/2157-7471.1000446 [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ayed F, Aydi-Ben-Abdallah R, Boussadia O, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Daami-Remadi M (2022) Potential of composted agricultural wastes to control stem rot and to promote growth in tomato. Pol J Environ Stud 31(3):2007–2018. 10.15244/pjoes/142508 [Google Scholar]
- 50.Muthukumar A, Venkatesh A (2013) Occurrence, virulence, inoculum density and plant age of Sclerotium rolfsii causing collar rot of peppermint. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 04:10. 10.4172/2157-7471.1000211 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ayed F, Aydi-Ben-Abdallah R, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Daami-Remadi M (2021) Selection of compost-derived actinomycetes with plant growth-promoting and tomato stem rot biocontrol potentialities. J Phytopathol Pest Manag 8(1):79–91 [Google Scholar]
- 52.Triki MA, Hammami I, Krid Haj-Taieb S, Daami-Remadi M, Mseddi A, El Mahjoub M, Gdoura R, Khammasy N (2012) Biological control of atypical Pink rot disease of potato in Tunisia. Pest Technol 6(Special Issue 1):60–64 [Google Scholar]
- 53.Aydi-Ben Abdallah R, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Nefzi A, Ayed F, Daami-Remadi M (2018) Endophytic bacteria from Solanum nigrum with plant growth-promoting and fusarium wilt-suppressive abilities in tomato. Tunis J Plant Prot 13(2):157–182 [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nawangsih AA, Damayanti I, Wiyono S, Kartika JG (2011) Selection and characterization of endophytic bacteria as biocontrol agents of tomato bacterial wilt disease. HAYATI J Biosci 18(2):66–70. 10.4308/hjb.18.2.66 [Google Scholar]
- 55.Anusree T, Bhai RS (2017) Rhizosphere actinobacteria for combating Phytophthora capsici and Sclerotium rolfsii, the major soilborne pathogens of black pepper (Piper nigrum L). Biol Control 109:1–13. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.03.006 [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gayathri S, Saravanan D, Radhakrishnan M, Balagurunathan R, Kathiresan K (2013) Bioprospecting potential of fast-growing endophytic bacteria from leaves of Mangrove and salt-marsh plant species. Indian J Biotechnol 9(4):397–402 [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sgroy V, Cassán F, Masciarelli O, Del Papa MF, Lagares A, Luna V (2009) Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting (PGPB) or stress homeostasis-regulating (PSHB) bacteria associated to the halophyte Prosopis strombulifera. Appl Microbiol Biotechno l85:371–381. 10.1007/s00253-009-2116-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tiru M, Muleta D, Bercha G, Adugna G (2013) Antagonistic effect of rhizobacteria against coffee wilt disease caused by Gibberella xylarioides. Asian J Plant Pathol 7:109–122. 10.3923/ajppaj.2013.109.122 [Google Scholar]
- 59.Errakhi R, Lebrihi A, Barakate M (2009) In vitro and in vivo antagonism of actinomycetes isolated from Moroccan rhizospherical soils against sclerotium rolfsii: a causal agent of root rot on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L). J Appl Microbiol 107:672–681. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04232.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kataoka M, Ueda K, Kudo T, Seki T, Yoshida T (1997) Application of the variable region in 16S rDNA to create an index for rapid species identification in the genus Streptomyces. FEMS Microbiol Lett 151:249–255. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12578.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bruehl GW (1987) Soilborne plant pathogens. Macmillan, New York [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Mejdoub-Trabelsi B, Aydi Ben Abdallah R, El-Mohamedy RSR, Daami-Remadi M (2020) Efficacy of organic amendments and soil solarization against wilt severity and their effects on pathogenic fungi and tomato production. Int J Phytopathol 9(2):93–103. 10.33687/phytopath.009.02.3317 [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mahfuz R, Tofazzal I, Lewis J, James K (2021) Biocontrol agent, biofumigation, and grafting with resistant rootstock suppress soil-borne disease and improve yield of tomato in West Virginia. Crop Prot 145:105630. 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105630 [Google Scholar]
- 64.Aydi-Ben Abdallah R, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Daami-Remadi M (2020) Fusarium wilt biocontrol and tomato growth stimulation, using endophytic bacteria naturally associated with Solanum Sodomaeum and S. bonariense plants. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30:113. 10.1186/s41938-020-00313-1 [Google Scholar]
- 65.De Corato U (2020b) Soil microbiota manipulation and its role in suppressing soil-borne plant pathogens in organic farming systems under the light of microbiome-assisted strategies. Chem Biol Technol Agric 7:17. 10.1186/s40538-020-00183-7 [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jacob S, Sajjalaguddam RR, Sudini HK (2018) Streptomyces Sp. RP1A-12 mediated control of peanut stem rot caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. J Integr Agric 17(4):892–900. 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61816-1 [Google Scholar]
- 67.Dandan H, Lanying W, Yanping L (2018) Isolation, identification, and the growth promoting effects of two antagonistic actinomycete strains from the rhizosphere of Mikania micrantha Kunth. Microbiol Res 208:1–11. 10.1016/j.micres.2018.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Meschke H, Schrempf H (2010) Streptomyces lividans inhibits the proliferation of the fungus Verticillium dahliae on seeds and roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Microb Biotechnol 3(4):428–443. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00165.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Harsonowati W, Astuti RI, Wahyudi AT (2017) Leaf blast disease reduction by rice-phyllosphere actinomycetes producing bioactive compounds. J Gen Plant Pathol 83(2):98–108. 10.1007/s10327-017-0700-4 [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liotti RG, Da Silva Figueiredo MI, Soares MA (2019) Streptomyces griseocarneus R132 controls phytopathogens and promotes growth of pepper (Capsicum annuum). Biol Control 138:104065. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104065 [Google Scholar]
- 71.Goudjal Y, Zamoum M, Sabaou N, Mathieu F, Zitouni A (2016) Potential of endophytic Streptomyces spp. For biocontrol of fusarium root rot disease and growth promotion of tomato seedlings. Biocontrol Sci Technol 26:1691–1705. 10.1080/09583157.2016.1234584 [Google Scholar]
- 72.Toumatia O, Compant S, Yekkour A, Goudjal Y, Sabaou N, Mathieu F, SessitschA, Zitouni A (2016) Biocontrol and plant growth promoting properties of Streptomyces mutabilis strain IA1 isolated from a saharan soil on wheat seedlings and visualization of its niches of colonization. S Afr J Bot 105:234–239. 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.03.020 [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sabaratnam S, Traquair JA (2015) Mechanism of antagonism by Streptomyces griseocarneus (strain Di944) against fungal pathogens of greenhouse-grown tomato transplants. Can J Plant Pathol 37:197–211. 10.1080/07060661.2015.1039062 [Google Scholar]
- 74.Khamna S, Yokota A, Lumyong S (2009) Actinomycetes isolated from medicinal plant rhizosphere soils: diversity and screening of antifungal compounds, indole-3-acetic acid and siderophore production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:649–655. 10.1007/s11274-008-9933-x [Google Scholar]
- 75.Salla TD, Astarita LV, Santarém ER (2016) Defense responses in plants of Eucalyptus elicited by Streptomyces and challenged with Botrytis cinerea. Planta 243:1055–1070. 10.1007/s00425-015-2460-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rashad YM, Al-Askar AA, Ghoneem KM, Saber WIA, Hafez EE (2017) Chitinolytic Streptomyces griseorubens E44G enhances the biocontrol efficacy against fusarium wilt disease of tomato. Phytoparasitica 45:227–237. 10.1007/s12600-017-0580-3 [Google Scholar]
- 77.Whipps JM (1997) Development in biological control of soil borne plant pathogens. Adv Bot Res 26:1–134. 10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60119-6 [Google Scholar]
- 78.Goudjal Y, Toumatia O, Sabaou N, Barakate M, Mathieu F, Zitouni A (2013) Endophytic actinomycetes from spontaneous plants of Algerian Sahara: indole-3-acetic acid production and tomato plants growth promoting activity. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:1821–1829. 10.1007/s11274-013-1344-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Alekhya G, Gopalakrishnan S (2017) Biological control and plant growth-promotion traits of Streptomyces species under greenhouse and field conditions in Chickpea. Agric Res 6:410–420. 10.1007/s40003-017-0278-2 [Google Scholar]
- 80.Qin S, Miao Q, Feng WW, Wang Y, Zhu X, Xing K, Jiang JH (2015) Biodiversity and plant growth promoting traits of culturable endophytic actinobacteria associated with Jatropha curcas L. growing in Panxi dry-hot Valley soil. Appl Soil Ecol 93:47–55. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.04.004 [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jacob S, Sudini HK (2016) Indirect plant growth promotion in grain legumes: role of Actinobacteria. In: Subramaniam G, Arumugam S, Rajendran V (eds) Plant growth promoting Actinobacteria. Springer, New York, pp 17–32 [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jensen PR, Mincer TJ, Williams PG, Fenical W (2005) Marine actinomycete diversity and natural product discovery. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 87:43–48. 10.1007/s10482-004-6540-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ilic SB, Konstantinovic SS, Todorovic ZB, Lazic ML, Veljkovic VB, Jokovic N, Radovanovic BC (2007) Antimicrobial activity of the bioactive metabolites in Streptomycetes isolates. Microbiology 76:421–428. 10.1134/S0026261707040066 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.El-Tarabily KA, Nassar AH, Sivasithamparam K (2008) Promotion of growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a calcareous soil by a phosphate solubilizing, rhizosphere-competent isolate of Micromonospora endolithica. Appl Soil Ecol 39(2):161–171. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
- 85.Shutsrirung A, Chromkaew Y, Pathom-Aree W, Choonluchanon S, Boonkerd N (2013) Diversity of endophytic actinomycetes in Mandarin grown in Northern Thailand, their phytohormone production potential and plant growth promoting activity. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 59(3):322–330. 10.1080/00380768.2013.776935 [Google Scholar]
- 86.Shimizu K, Maseda H, Okano K, Itayama T, Kawauchi Y, Chen R, Utsumi M, Zhang ZSugiura N (2011) How microcystin-degrading bacteria express microcystin degradation activity. Lakes Reserv: Res Manag 16(3):169–178. 10.1111/j.1440-1770.2011.00480.x [Google Scholar]
- 87.Klenk HP, Held B, Lucas S, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Hammon N, Pitluck S, Goodwin LA, Han C, Tapia R, Brambilla EM, Pötter G, Land M, Ivanova M, Rohde M, Göker M, Detter JC, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T (2012) Genome sequence of the soil bacterium Saccharomonospora azurea type strain (NA-128T). Stand Genom Sci 25:220–229. 10.4056/%2Fsigs.2635833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Jose PA, Jha B (2016) New dimensions of research on actinomycetes: quest for next generation antibiotics. Front Microbiol 7:1295. 10.3389/%2Ffmicb.2016.01295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Shreevidya M, Gopalakrishnan S, Kudapa H, Varshney NK (2016) Exploring plant growth-promotion actinomycetes from vermicompost and rhizosphere soil for yield enhancement in Chickpea. Braz J Microbiol 47(1):85–95. 10.1016/%2Fj.bjm.2015.11.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Shivalee A, Lingappa K, Mahesh D (2018) Influence of bioprocess variables on the production of extracellular chitinase under submerged fermentation by Streptomyces pratensis strain KLSL55. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 16(2):421–426. 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Khamna S, Yokota A, Peberdy JF, Lumyong S (2010) Indole-3-acetic acid production by Streptomyces Sp. isolated from some Thai medicinal plant rhizosphere soils. EurAsian J Biosci 4:23–32. 10.5053/ejobios.2010.4.0.4 [Google Scholar]
- 92.Van der Hiejden MGA, Bardgett RD, van Straalen NM (2008) The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:296–310. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hamdali H, Hafidi M, Virolle MJ, Ouhdouch Y (2008) Growth promotion and protection against damping-off of wheat by two rock phosphate solubilizing actinomycetes in a P-deficient soil under greenhouse conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 40:510–517. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.08.001 [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sellstedt A, Richau KH (2013) Aspects of nitrogen-fixing actinobacteria, in particular free-living and symbiotic Frankia. FEMS Microbiol Lett 342(2):179–186. 10.1111/1574-6968.12116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Poovarasan S, Mohandas S, Sita T (2015) Functional characterization of actinomycetes isolated from the AM fungal (Glomus mosseae) spores. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 4(9):598–612 [Google Scholar]
- 96.Rajkumar M, Ae N, Prasad MNV, Freitas H (2010) Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol 28:142–149. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kodani S, Komaki H, SuzukiM, Kobayakawa F, Hemmi H (2015) Structure determination of a siderophore Peucechelin from Streptomyces peucetius. Biometals 28(5):791–801. 10.1007/s10534-015-9866-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Boukaew S, Plubrukam A, Prasertsan P (2013) Effect of volatile substances from Streptomyces Philanthi RM-1-138 on growth of Rhizoctonia Solani on rice leaf. Biocontrol 58:471–482. 10.1007/s10526-013-9510-6 [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wang C, Wang Z, Qiao X, Li Z, Li F, Chen M, Wang Y, Huang Y, Cui H (2013) Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds from Streptomyces alboflavus TD-1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 341:45–51. 10.1111/1574-6968.12088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Saadoun I, Rawashdeh R, Dayeh T, Ababneh Q, Mahasneh A (2007) Isolation, characterization and screening for fiber hydrolytic enzymes-producing streptomycetes of Jordanian forest soils. Biotechnology 6:120–128. 10.3923/biotech.2007.120.128 [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ben Slama H, Triki MA, Bouket AC, Ben Mefteh F, Alenezi FN, Luptakova L, Cherif Silini H, Vallat A, Oszako T, Gharsallah N, Belbahri L (2019) Screening of the high-rhizosphere competent Limoniastrum monopetalum’ culturable endophyte microbiota allows the recovery of multifaceted and versatile biocontrol agents. Microorganisms 7:249–277. 10.3390/%2Fmicroorganisms7080249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ramesh S, Mathivanan N (2009) Screening of marine actinomycetes isolated from the Bay of Bengal, India for antimicrobial activity and industrial enzymes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:2103–2111. 10.1007/s11274-009-0113-4 [Google Scholar]



