Abstract
We report strong spin–orbit torques (SOTs) generated by noncollinear antiferromagnets Mn3Ni0.35Cu0.65N, over a wide temperature range. The SOT efficiency peaks up to 0.3 at the Néel temperature (T N ), substantially higher than that of commonly studied nonmagnets, such as Pt. The sign and magnitude of the SOTs measured in our experiments are corroborated by density functional theory, confirming the dominance of the orbital Hall effect over the spin Hall effect in the nonmagnetic phase above T N . In contrast, the strong temperature-dependent SOTs observed around and below T N can be explained by recently developed mechanisms involving chirality-induced and extrinsic scattering-driven spin and orbital currents, considering the effect of spin fluctuations at finite temperatures. Our work not only reports a large magnitude of SOT but also sheds light on a new possible origin where orbital currents can be harnessed by leveraging the chirality of noncollinear antiferromagnets, which holds promise for magnetic memory applications.
Keywords: spin and orbital Hall effect, noncollinear antiferromagnet, spin−orbit torques, spin fluctuation


Spin–orbit torques (SOTs) currently offer a highly efficient mechanism for the current-induced switching of nanomagnets as required for the implementation of next-generation spintronics devices such as nonvolatile magnetic random-access memories (MRAM). , Typically, strong SOTs are generated by applying an in-plane electric current in the heavy metal (HM)/ferromagnet (FM) bilayers, where the HM generates a transverse spin current due to the spin-Hall effect (SHE). Recently, spintronics research has shifted its focus toward generating orbital Hall currents in nonmagnets (NMs). This shift is primarily due to the advantage that orbital Hall currents are not limited by spin–orbit coupling (SOC), thereby broadening the range of materials that can serve as promising candidates for MRAMs. On the other hand, noncollinear antiferromagnets (NC-AFMs) represent a new class of magnetic materials that exhibit various exotic effects, including chirality-induced anomalous Hall effect − without requiring net magnetization and unconventional spin currents, − although studies on orbital Hall effects (OHE) in these materials are still lacking. Previously, a chirality-driven novel spin current has been predicted to exhibit a strong temperature dependence due to spin fluctuations in NC-AFM systems, yet this phenomenon has not been experimentally reported. Some recent works also suggest a significant effect on the orbital properties of conducting electrons in magnets induced by spin fluctuations. , Therefore, exploring novel spin and orbital current generation over a wide temperature range in NC-AFMs is of fundamental interest.
The orbital current is a fundamental quantity primarily generated from the orbital character of the bandstructure, providing an intrinsic robust source that can manifest as a spin current in the presence of spin–orbit coupling (SOC). − A nontrivial temperature dependence of the spin current has been theoretically predicted in magnetic materials, including ferromagnets and collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnets, , due to spin fluctuations, which contribute to extrinsic scattering mechanisms such as skew scattering and side jump. ,,, Such fluctuation-mediated spin-current generation has been experimentally reported in ferromagnets − and collinear AFMs recently. , Magnon transport through a collinear insulating AFM spacer layer has been exploited to probe magnetic phase transition. − These observations raise an intriguing question of whether spin fluctuations in chiral NC-AFMs can be utilized to produce large SOTs for practical applications. In this work, we address this key question while exploring the role of orbital current influenced by the chirality of NC-AFM. We have studied SOT produced by NC-AFM, Mn3Ni0.35Cu0.65N (MNCN), as its Néel temperature (T N ) is around 210 K, providing full access to quantify SOT from cryogenic temperatures to room temperature.
We prepare epitaxial MNCN films of a thickness of 15 nm by the reactive magnetron sputtering technique on a (111) oriented single-crystal MgO substrate (Figure a). More details of the thin-film growth and material characterization can be found in the Supporting Information and previous works. , After the MNCN growth, Cu (1.5 nm) /Ni81Fe21 (Py) (4–6 nm)/Cu (2 nm)/AlO x (2 nm) is deposited without breaking the vacuum. We use a 1.5 nm Cu spacer between MNCN and Py to magnetically decouple these layers, while the 2 nm thick top Cu layer is used to reduce the overall Oersted field acting on the magnet by the current shunting effects through both the top and bottom layers. The decoupling is necessary as the effect on the Py could not be measured for exchange-coupled antiferromagnet and ferromagnetic layers. So only by decoupling, the Cu layer enables a clear detection of damping-like torque (DLT) acting on the Py in our experiment. Py is used as a magnet as it shows nominal in-plane anisotropy compared to other elemental magnets, such as Co and Ni, when grown on epitaxial materials such as MNCN. High Ni concentrations further enable us to probe the contribution of the orbital current by leveraging its spin–orbit coupling. In MNCN, the Kagome plane resides in the (111) sample plane (more details in the Supporting Information) where Hall-bars (50 × 20 μm2) are fabricated using standard optical lithography, etching, and lift-off techniques.
1.
Second harmonic Hall (SHH) measurements. (a) The crystal structure of Mn3Ni0.35Cu0.65N (MNCN) with the spins in the Γ4G configuration. (b) Schematic representation of SHH measurements. Measured first harmonic voltages (V 1ω) by rotating the magnetic field (H ext ) in the plane to determine V P (c) and sweeping the magnetic field out of the plane to determine V A and H ⊥ (d). (e) Measured second harmonic Hall voltage (V 2ω) signal for two different values of H ext . (f) Fitting of the experimental data (red squares) with the contribution from DLT (pink curve) and FLT (blue curve). (g, h) Extracted values of C A and C P as a function of H ext .
To quantify SOTs, we adopt the well-established technique of second harmonic Hall (SHH) measurements − performed in a three-dimensional vector-cryo setup in the presence of an external magnetic field (H ext ) at different temperatures (T) ranging from 4 to 300 K. The schematics of the experiment are shown in Figure b. We apply a low frequency (613 Hz) alternating electric current (ac) and record both the first harmonic (V 1ω) and second harmonic Hall (V 2ω) voltages while rotating H ext of different strengths (0.03 to 0.9 T), well above the in-plane saturation field of Py (<0.005 T). MNCN produces two different types of torques, i.e., (1) in-plane damping-like torque (DLT), τ DL ∝ m × (σ × m ), where m is the unit vector of Py magnetization and σ is generated by angular momentum from SHE and/or OHE. For the DLT, the equivalent current-induced effective spin–orbit field (SOF), H DL , deflects the magnet out of the plane, creating an oscillation in the resistance due to AHE. (2) Out-of-plane field-like torque (FLT), τ FL ∝ m × ( H FL + H FL ), where H Oe is the Oersted field generated by the conductive shunting layers (e.g., Cu and MNCN) and H FL corresponds to interfacial SOF which is found to be negligible and not the main focus of this work. FLT from H FL deflects the magnet in the sample plane, resulting in oscillating resistance due to the planar Hall effect (PHE). The mixing of the oscillating applied current and oscillating resistance produces V 2ω, which can be expressed by eq − in the absence of any other unconventional torques.
| 1 |
where
| 2 |
V ANE and V ONE are the strength of anomalous Nernst effect (ANE) and ordinary Nernst effect (ONE), respectively, which are generated due to the unintentional out-of-plane thermal gradient that is coupled to the in-plane magnetization of Py and H ext respectively. V P is the coefficient of the PHE voltage, V PHE = V P sin 2ϕ, where ϕ is the angle between applied current and magnetization in the sample plane (xy-plane) (Figure b). V P is determined by measuring V 1ω while rotating H ext in the plane (Figure c). V A is the coefficient of the AHE voltage, V AHE = V A cos θ, where θ is the angle between the magnetization and out-of-plane z-axis (Figure d). The coefficient V A is obtained from V 1ω while sweeping H ext out of the plane (Figure d). The same measurement also provides us with the information on H ⊥, the out-of-plane demagnetization field, which is in the range of 0.4 T for a 4 nm thick Py film (Figure d). More details can be found in the Supporting Information.
Figure e shows a typical second harmonic voltage (V 2ω) measured in our experiment for two different values of H ext , 0.05 T (red squares) and 0.13 T (blue triangles), which are fit to eq (black curves). We find that the magnitude of the measured V 2ω decreases for higher values of H ext , suggesting that the signals predominantly originate from the SOTs (eqs and ). Unlike other similar types of single crystal AFMs, we do not observe any large contribution of unconventional torques , in our Γ4g configuration, which could be due to the presence of domain variants. Figure f shows the fitting components of V 2ω for H ext = 0.05 T using eq . The cos ϕ component (pink curve) indicates a dominant contribution from DLT, whereas the cos ϕ cos 2ϕ component (blue curve) indicates an FLT. To quantify the current-induced spin–orbit fields, H DL and H FL , we plot these fitting coefficients, C A (red squares) and C P (blue squares) as a function of H ext which fit well to eq (black curve in Figure e,f). We find that both C A and C P decrease for higher magnitude of H ext and saturate close to zero, suggesting SOTs are the dominant source of the V 2ω signal and thermal signals, e.g., ANE and ONE are negligible. Note that, it is very important to perform the in-plane SHH measurement by rotating H ext up to a high value (H ext = 0.9 T), much larger than the demagnetization field (H ⊥ ∼ 0.4 T in our case), to get an accurate estimation of H DL . The DLT efficiency per unit electric field (ξ DL ) and per unit current density (ξ DL ) can be obtained from eq :
| 3 |
where μ0 is the vacuum permeability, ℏ is Planck’s constant, e is the electronic charge, M S is the saturation magnetization as obtained from the SQUID magnetometry (600 emu/cc ≈ 0.75 T), and ρ is the electrical resistivity of MNCN (Figure a). ξ DL and ξ DL are lower bounds of the internal spin-Hall conductivity (σ SH ) and spin-Hall angle (θ SH ) respectively, due to the losses of the angular momentum transfer at the interface. To understand the origins of the SOTs, we next probe its temperature dependence.
3.

Origins of spin–orbital torques. DFT calculations of spin-Hall conductivity (σ SH ) and orbital-Hall conductivity (σ OH ) of MNCN in NC-AFM and NM phases in panels (a) and (b), respectively. (c) The interplay between scalar spin chirality (SSC) induced (blue) and static mean-field induced OHE (red) predicting anomalous temperature dependence of the resultant σ OH (black curve). The blue curve in panel (c) represents SSC, which exhibits σ OH = 0 at 0 K, and has been shifted vertically for clarity in comparison. (d) Schematic representation of the generation of spin-current (arrow with a solid ball) and orbital current (semicircular arrow) across different temperature regimes.
MNCN exhibits a metallic behavior showing an increase in the resistivity (ρ) with an increase of the temperature (Figure a). There is a prominent change in ρ around 210 K, suggesting a transition from the antiferromagnetic to paramagnetic phase, which is consistent with the literature. ,, Figure b,c show a strong and unusual variation of ξ DL (black squares) with respect to both temperature (T) and longitudinal electrical conductivity (σ xx ). There is a large enhancement in both ξ DL (nearly 70%) and ξ DL (approximately 140%) near T N (Figure b-d), strongly suggesting an influence of spin fluctuations in our NC-AFM. The maximum ascertained values of (1.2 ± 0.1) × 105 S/m and ξ DL = 0.30 ± 0.03 are much larger than those of the commonly studied heavy metals such as Pt (ξ DL = 0.07) and, most surprisingly, in the absence of any heavy element in the MNCN compound. As detailed in the Supporting Information, we have verified that the self-induced torques are negligible by conducting SHH measurements in Cu/Py/Cu samples. We have further performed spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance (ST-FMR) − measurements at room temperature, which is consistent with SHH measurements, confirming a strong SOT generated by MNCN (for details, see the Supporting Information).
2.

Temperature dependence of SOTs. (a) Resistivity (ρ) of MNCN as a function of temperature (T). The slope change of resistivity around 210 K indicates the Néel temperature (T N ). Damping-like torque (DLT) efficiency per unit electric field, ξ DL , (black squares) as a function of T (b) and electrical conductivity, σ xx (c). The blue-dashed curve in panels (b) and (c) represents the expected dependence of ξ DL for a conventional nonmagnet (NM), such as Pt. The solid red curve represents the fitting of ξ DL with respect to the temperature or σ xx . The inset in (c) is a zoomed-in image near the transition temperature. (d) Estimated DLT efficiency per unit current density, ξ DL , as a function of temperature (T).
The general trend of ξ DL and σ xx as a function of temperature for a typical nonmagnet (such as Pt) is shown by the blue dashed line in Figure b,c. ,, For the commonly used nonmagnets, we expect roughly σ DL ∝ σ xx in the “dirty metal regime” (for σ xx < 106 S/m) due to the reduction of the carrier lifetime when the mean free path becomes comparable to the lattice constants. ,, As the temperature is lowered, when σ xx increases to the range of 106–108 S/m (“clean metal regime”), σ DL becomes nearly independent of σ xx as the carrier lifetime becomes comparable to the SOC energy. ,, For the ultraclean metals (σ xx > 108 S/m), when other spin-independent scattering processes are greatly suppressed, we can observe the contribution from the extrinsic spin-dependent scattering potentials producing σ DL ∝ σ xx where n > 1. , Below the Néel temperature (T N ), in our case, σ DL decreases as σ xx increases with the decrease in temperature (Figure b,c), which is odd with any of these proposed mechanisms.
To ascertain possible origins of our observed large DLT efficiency, we carried out density functional theory (DFT) calculations of MNCN in both the nonmagnetic phase and NC-AFM phase with the static “all in-all-out” magnetic configuration (Figure a,b), followed by atomistic spin dynamics simulations (Figure c). For both magnetic and nonmagnetic phases, the DFT calculation predicts a small intrinsic spin-Hall conductivity (σ SH ) below 1 × 104 S/m with a negative sign (similar to Ta), and a significant orbital-Hall conductivity 5 × 105 S/m with a positive sign (similar to Pt). The spin–orbit coupling is very small in this material and does not contribute to OHE. Note that the magnitude of σ OH slightly decreases in the magnetic phase compared to the nonmagnetic phase, suggesting that OHE fundamentally originates from the material’s crystal structure.
Our reported value of (1.2 ± 0.1) × 105 S/m is much larger than the predicted value of σ SH with opposite sign. We point out that such a sign change in SOT measurements is a key signature of OHE, as previously identified for other systems in the literature. ,, Therefore, we attribute the large and positive sign of ξ DL observed in MNCN/Ni81Fe19 bilayers in the nonmagnetic phase (above T N ) to the OHE, reporting the first experimental demonstration of OHE in any NC-AFM. The generated orbital current from MNCN is converted into the spin current in the magnet using the SOC of Ni, which constitutes of 81% Py, thereby generating large orbital torques. However, the strong temperature dependence of SOTs below T N cannot be fully explained with this intrinsic OHE from the orbitals, as it is necessary to consider the role of chirality and extrinsic scattering arising from noncollinear magnetic ordering at finite temperature due to spin fluctuations. The generation of SOT has been studied in various NC-AFMs, including IrMn3, Mn3GaN, Mn3Sn, and Mn3Pt, with reported SOT efficiencies ranging from 0.1 to 0.3. ,,− While our estimated SOT efficiency (0.3) is among the highest, the most striking observation is its significant enhancement near T N , suggesting a novel mechanism for harnessing orbital current in NC-AFMs.
The observed temperature dependence of SOTs shows qualitative agreement with previous reports in ferromagnets − and collinear AFMs, , which was attributed to extrinsic scattering mechanisms driven by magnetic fluctuations. Ref has theoretically studied the chirality-induced spin current in NC-AFMs, which can also qualitatively explain our results considering the competition of this chirality-induced spin current and previously explained orbital current, particularly applicable below T N . It is noteworthy that in our case ξ DL ∝ T 2 below T N , whereas it exhibits a more pronounced effect with sharp peaks around the transition temperature for ferromagnets − and collinear antiferromagnets. , In addition to the existing scattering-driven processes, we propose an alternative mechanism, the chirality-induced orbital current generation influenced by spin fluctuation across and below T N , which could also play an important role in our NC-AFM. This conjecture aligns with the recent theoretical prediction and experimental demonstration of orbital magnetism by magnonic excitations. Therefore, this phenomenon can also exist in other types of NC-AFM.
We expand the possibility of the temperature-dependent OHE upon the framework introduced in ref for MNCN. We observe that the scalar spin chirality (SSC) resulting from fluctuating spins increases up to T N , followed by a rapid decline to zero after T N (blue curve in Figure c), coming hand-in-hand with chirality-induced orbital Hall current. Note that SSC would produce σ OH = 0 at 0 K and this curve has been shifted vertically for clarity. The red curve in Figure c illustrates the mean-field OHE variation originating from the suppression of magnetic order across the magnetic phase, bridging the limiting cases of T = 0 and T > T N . Its functional form lies in the assumption of the direct proportionality to the order parameter’s temperature dependence (see Section S5 and eq S11 in the Supporting Information for more details). The interplay between these processes may generate a peak in the magnitude of the orbital-Hall current, as elucidated by the black curve in Figure c suggesting a qualitative agreement with our experiments (Figure c). It is important to note that the predicted OHE from scalar spin chirality is expected to be proportional to T 2 (see Section S5 in the Supporting Information) for low temperature, which agrees with our experimental results shown in Figure b. Notably, in our material, M3Ni0.35Cu0.65N, the Γ4g phase is stabilized with spins oriented in an all-in-all-out configuration (Figure a). Further material optimization is required to achieve the Γ5g phase, which can exhibit different chiralities. Comparing the SOT generation in these two phases with the chirality dependence would be intriguing and remains an exciting direction for future research. This scenario potentially unveils an innovative mechanism to enhance orbital currents through fluctuating spins, offering a new perspective on the significance of scalar spin chirality in the transport properties of broad categories of the noncollinear antiferromagnets. The proposed new mechanism can coexist with the scattering-based spin and orbital current generation processes.
In conclusion, we report an unprecedented temperature dependence of the strong spin–orbit torques in the epitaxial noncollinear thin film antiferromagnet Mn3Ni0.35Cu0.65N, which peaks around the Néel temperature (∼210 K) with estimated spin torque efficiency per unit current density (ξ DL ) approximately 0.3, significantly larger than that can be realized using conventional heavy metals such as Pt. Our experimental observation strongly suggests a dominant contribution from the orbital-Hall effect above the transition temperature, which agrees with the density functional theory calculation in terms of sign and also in magnitude. The strong temperature dependence of torques around and below Néel temperature could be explained by both extrinsic skew-scattering driven and chirality-induced spin and orbital currents triggered by spin fluctuations. These concepts are exciting avenue for future research and can open up new prospects for MRAM applications by achieving large spin–orbit torques.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The groups at JGU Mainz and KAUST acknowledge support from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) under award 2024 − CRG12 − 6480.A.B. is thankful to the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for the postdoctoral fellowship. M.K., A.S., A.R., Y.M., and A.B. thank the Graduate School of Excellence Materials Science in Mainz (MAINZ, GSC266); Spin+X TRR 173-268565370 (projects A01, A11, A12, B02) and Project No. 358671374; the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Commission under FETOpen Grant Agreement No. 863155 (s-Nebula); the Horizon Europe Framework programme under EIC Pathfinder OPEN grant 101129641 “OBELIX”; the European Research Council Grant Agreement No. 856538 (3D MAGiC); and the Research Council of Norway through its Centers of Excellence funding scheme, Project No. 262633 “QuSpin”. A.R. and M.K. acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014–2020) under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 860060 (ITN MagnEFi). T.G.S., D.G., and Y.M. gratefully acknowledge the Jülich Supercomputing Centre for providing computational resources under project jiff40. L.Z. thanks the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12347156) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20230516). T.H. and H.A. acknowledge funding from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI Grant Nos. 20H02602 and 19K15445). U.S., A.M., and M.K. acknowledge funding from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) under award 2020–CRG8–4048. A.M. was supported by the Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University A*MIdex, a French “Investissements d’Avenir program”.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05423.
Sample preparation and characterization; details of SHH measurement technique; comparison with ST-FMR data MNCN/Cu/Py/Cu/cap at room temperature; SHH data of Cu/Py/Cu samples; and computational details (PDF)
¶.
Department of Physics, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar, 190006,Jammu and Kashmir, India
The samples were grown by T.H. and H.A., while the devices were fabricated by A.B. who, together with A.S., conducted the experiments. A.B. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. A.R. and D.K. assisted in measurements. T.G.S. and L.Z. performed the DFT and chirality calculations, respectively, with inputs from Y.M.; D.G. and A.M. provided the theoretical insights. M.K. was the principal investigator and supervised the whole project. All authors commented on the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Manchon A., Železný J., Miron I. M., Jungwirth T., Sinova J., Thiaville A., Garello K., Gambardella P.. Current-Induced Spin-Orbit Torques in Ferromagnetic and Antiferromagnetic Systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019;91(3):035004. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dieny B., Prejbeanu I. L., Garello K., Gambardella P., Freitas P., Lehndorff R., Raberg W., Ebels U., Demokritov S. O., Akerman J., Deac A., Pirro P., Adelmann C., Anane A., Chumak A. V., Hirohata A., Mangin S., Valenzuela S. O., Onbaşlı M. C., D’Aquino M., Prenat G., Finocchio G., Lopez-Diaz L., Chantrell R., Chubykalo-Fesenko O., Bortolotti P.. Opportunities and Challenges for Spintronics in the Microelectronics Industry. Nat. Electron. 2020;3(8):446–459. doi: 10.1038/s41928-020-0461-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sinova J., Valenzuela S. O., Wunderlich J., Back C. H., Jungwirth T.. Spin Hall Effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015;87(4):1213–1260. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Go D., Jo D., Lee H.-W., Kläui M., Mokrousov Y.. Orbitronics: Orbital Currents in Solids. Europhys. Lett. 2021;135(3):37001. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/ac2653. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta R., Bouard C., Kammerbauer F., Ledesma-Martin J. O., Bose A., Kononenko I., Martin S., Usé P., Jakob G., Drouard M., Kläui M.. Harnessing Orbital Hall Effect in Spin-Orbit Torque MRAM. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):130. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55437-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H., Qin P., Yan H., Feng Z., Zhou X., Wang X., Meng Z., Liu L., Liu Z.. Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Spintronics. Materials Lab. 2022;1:220032. doi: 10.54227/mlab.20220032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H., Niu Q., MacDonald A. H.. Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from Noncollinear Antiferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;112(1):017205. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.017205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakatsuji S., Kiyohara N., Higo T.. Large Anomalous Hall Effect in a Non-Collinear Antiferromagnet at Room Temperature. Nature. 2015;527(7577):212–215. doi: 10.1038/nature15723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nayak A. K., Fischer J. E., Sun Y., Yan B., Karel J., Komarek A. C., Shekhar C., Kumar N., Schnelle W., Kübler J., Felser C., Parkin S. S. P.. Large Anomalous Hall Effect Driven by a Nonvanishing Berry Curvature in the Noncolinear Antiferromagnet Mn3Ge. Sci. Adv. 2016;2(4):e1501870. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao K., Hajiri T., Chen H., Miki R., Asano H., Gegenwart P.. Anomalous Hall Effect in the Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Antiperovskite Mn3Ni1‑xCuxN. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100(4):045109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.045109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rajan A., Saunderson T. G., Lux F. R., Díaz R. Y., Abdullah H. M., Bose A., Bednarz B., Kim J.-Y., Go D., Hajiri T., Shukla G., Gomonay O., Yao Y., Feng W., Asano H., Schwingenschlögl U., López-Díaz L., Sinova J., Mokrousov Y., Manchon A., Kläui M.. Revealing the Higher-Order Spin Nature of the Hall Effect in Non-Collinear Antiferromagnet Mn3Ni0.35Cu0.65N. arXiv. 2023:arXiv:2304.10747. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.10747. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Železný J., Zhang Y., Felser C., Yan B.. Spin-Polarized Current in Noncollinear Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119(18):187204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.187204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Železný J., Sun Y., van den Brink J., Yan B.. Spin Hall Effect Emerging from a Noncollinear Magnetic Lattice without Spin-Orbit Coupling. New J. Phys. 2018;20(7):073028. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/aad1eb. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ishizuka H., Nagaosa N.. Spin Chirality Induced Skew Scattering and Anomalous Hall Effect in Chiral Magnets. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:eaap9962. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Higo T., Tanaka K., Nomoto T., Tsai H., Idzuchi H., Shiga M., Sakamoto S., Ando R., Kosaki H., Matsuo T., Nishio-Hamane D., Arita R., Miwa S., Nakatsuji S.. Octupole-Driven Magnetoresistance in an Antiferromagnetic Tunnel Junction. Nature. 2023;613(7944):490–495. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05463-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin P., Yan H., Wang X., Chen H., Meng Z., Dong J., Zhu M., Cai J., Feng Z., Zhou X., Liu L., Zhang T., Zeng Z., Zhang J., Jiang C., Liu Z.. Room-Temperature Magnetoresistance in an All-Antiferromagnetic Tunnel Junction. Nature. 2023;613(7944):485–489. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05461-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nan T., Quintela C. X., Irwin J., Gurung G., Shao D. F., Gibbons J., Campbell N., Song K., Choi S.-Y., Guo L., Johnson R. D., Manuel P., Chopdekar R. V., Hallsteinsen I., Tybell T., Ryan P. J., Kim J. W., Choi Y., Radaelli P. G., Ralph D. C., Tsymbal E. Y., Rzchowski M. S., Eom C. B.. Controlling Spin Current Polarization through Non-Collinear Antiferromagnetism. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):4671. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17999-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dc M., Shao D. F., Hou V. D. H., Vailionis A., Quarterman P., Habiboglu A., Venuti M. B., Xue F., Huang Y. L., Lee C. M., Miura M., Kirby B., Bi C., Li X., Deng Y., Lin S. J., Tsai W., Eley S., Wang W. G., Borchers J. A., Tsymbal E. Y., Wang S. X.. Observation of Anti-Damping Spin-Orbit Torques Generated by in-Plane and out-of-Plane Spin Polarizations in MnPd3 . Nat. Mater. 2023;22(5):591–598. doi: 10.1038/s41563-023-01522-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimata M., Chen H., Kondou K., Sugimoto S., Muduli P. K., Ikhlas M., Omori Y., Tomita T., MacDonald A. H., Nakatsuji S., Otani Y.. Magnetic and Magnetic Inverse Spin Hall Effects in a Non-Collinear Antiferromagnet. Nature. 2019;565(7741):627–630. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0853-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L., Go D., Hanke J.-P., Buhl P. M., Grytsiuk S., Blügel S., Lux F. R., Mokrousov Y.. Imprinting and Driving Electronic Orbital Magnetism Using Magnons. Commun. Phys. 2020;3(1):227. doi: 10.1038/s42005-020-00490-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alahmed L., Zhang X., Wen J., Xiong Y., Li Y., Zhang L., Lux F., Freimuth F., Mahdi M., Mokrousov Y., Novosad V., Kwok W.-K., Yu D., Zhang W., Lee Y. S., Li P.. Evidence of Magnon-Mediated Orbital Magnetism in a Quasi-2D Topological Magnon Insulator. Nano Lett. 2022;22(13):5114–5119. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao D., Chang M.-C., Niu Q.. Berry Phase Effects on Electronic Properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82(3):1959–2007. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka T., Kontani H., Naito M., Naito T., Hirashima D. S., Yamada K., Inoue J.. Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect and Orbital Hall Effect in 4d and 5d Transition Metals. Phys. Rev. B. 2008;77(16):165117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.165117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo G. Y., Murakami S., Chen T.-W., Nagaosa N.. Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect in Platinum: First-Principles Calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100(9):096401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.096401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freimuth F., Blügel S., Mokrousov Y.. Anisotropic Spin Hall Effect from First Principles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;105(24):246602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.246602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okamoto S., Egami T., Nagaosa N.. Critical Spin Fluctuation Mechanism for the Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123(19):196603. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.196603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fang C., Wan C., Zhang X., Okamoto S., Ma T., Qin J., Wang X., Guo C., Dong J., Yu G., Wen Z., Tang N., Parkin S. S. P., Nagaosa N., Lu Y., Han X.. Observation of the Fluctuation Spin Hall Effect in a Low-Resistivity Antiferromagnet. Nano Lett. 2023;23(24):11485–11492. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crépieux A., Bruno P.. Theory of the Anomalous Hall Effect from the Kubo Formula and the Dirac Equation. Phys. Rev. B. 2001;64(1):014416. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.014416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wei D. H., Niimi Y., Gu B., Ziman T., Maekawa S., Otani Y.. The Spin Hall Effect as a Probe of Nonlinear Spin Fluctuations. Nat. Commun. 2012;3(1):1058. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ou Y., Ralph D. C., Buhrman R. A.. Strong Enhancement of the Spin Hall Effect by Spin Fluctuations near the Curie Point of FexPt1-x Alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120(9):97203. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.097203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu P.-H., Qu D., Tu Y.-C., Lin Y.-Z., Chien C. L., Huang S.-Y.. Exploiting Spin Fluctuations for Enhanced Pure Spin Current. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022;128(22):227203. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.227203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frangou L., Oyarzún S., Auffret S., Vila L., Gambarelli S., Baltz V.. Enhanced Spin Pumping Efficiency in Antiferromagnetic IrMn Thin Films around the Magnetic Phase Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;116(7):077203. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.077203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu Z., Li J., Hou D., Arenholz E., N’Diaye A. T., Tan A., Uchida K., Sato K., Okamoto S., Tserkovnyak Y., Qiu Z. Q., Saitoh E.. Spin-Current Probe for Phase Transition in an Insulator. Nat. Commun. 2016;7(1):12670. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hou D., Qiu Z., Barker J., Sato K., Yamamoto K., Vélez S., Gomez-Perez J. M., Hueso L. E., Casanova F., Saitoh E.. Tunable Sign Change of Spin Hall Magnetoresistance in Pt/NiO/YIG Structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118(14):147202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.147202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu Z., Hou D., Barker J., Yamamoto K., Gomonay O., Saitoh E.. Spin Colossal Magnetoresistance in an Antiferromagnetic Insulator. Nat. Mater. 2018;17(7):577–580. doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0087-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miki R., Zhao K., Hajiri T., Gegenwart P., Asano H.. Epitaxial Growth and Orientation-Dependent Anomalous Hall Effect of Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Mn3Ni0.35Cu0.65N Films. J. Appl. Phys. 2020;127(11):113907. doi: 10.1063/1.5142250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi M., Kim J., Yamanouchi M., Ohno H.. Quantitative Characterization of the Spin-Orbit Torque Using Harmonic Hall Voltage Measurements. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;89(14):144425. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.144425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Avci C. O., Garello K., Gabureac M., Ghosh A., Fuhrer A., Alvarado S. F., Gambardella P.. Interplay of Spin-Orbit Torque and Thermoelectric Effects in Ferromagnet/Normal-Metal Bilayers. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90(22):224427. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Roschewsky N., Walker E. S., Gowtham P., Muschinske S., Hellman F., Bank S. R., Salahuddin S.. Spin-Orbit Torque and Nernst Effect in Bi-Sb/Co Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99(19):195103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schulz T., Lee K., Krüger B., Lo Conte R., Karnad G. V., Garcia K., Vila L., Ocker B., Ravelosona D., Kläui M.. Effective Field Analysis Using the Full Angular Spin-Orbit Torque Magnetometry Dependence. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;95(22):224409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.224409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dutta S., Bose A., Tulapurkar A. A., Buhrman R. A., Ralph D. C.. Interfacial and Bulk Spin Hall Contributions to Fieldlike Spin-Orbit Torque Generated by Iridium. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;103(18):184416. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bose A., Schreiber N. J., Jain R., Shao D.-F., Nair H. P., Sun J., Zhang X. S., Muller D. A., Tsymbal E. Y., Schlom D. G., Ralph D. C.. Tilted Spin Current Generated by the Collinear Antiferromagnet Ruthenium Dioxide. Nat. Electron. 2022;5(5):267–274. doi: 10.1038/s41928-022-00744-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu L., Moriyama T., Ralph D. C., Buhrman R. A.. Spin-Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance Induced by the Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106(3):036601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.036601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bose A., Kammerbauer F., Gupta R., Go D., Mokrousov Y., Jakob G., Kläui M.. Detection of Long-Range Orbital-Hall Torques. Phys. Rev. B. 2023;107(13):134423. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.134423. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vignale G.. Ten Years of Spin Hall Effect. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2010;23(1):3–10. doi: 10.1007/s10948-009-0547-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bose A., Nelson J. N., Zhang X. S., Jadaun P., Jain R., Schlom D. G., Ralph D. C., Muller D. A., Shen K. M., Buhrman R. A.. Effects of Anisotropic Strain on Spin-Orbit Torque Produced by the Dirac Nodal Line Semimetal IrO2 . ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(49):55411–55416. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c16485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D., Go D., Park H.-J., Jeong W., Ko H.-W., Yun D., Jo D., Lee S., Go G., Oh J. H., Kim K.-J., Park B.-G., Min B.-C., Koo H. C., Lee H.-W., Lee O., Lee K.-J.. Orbital Torque in Magnetic Bilayers. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):6710. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26650-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi H., Jo D., Go D., Gao T., Haku S., Mokrousov Y., Lee H.-W., Ando K.. Observation of Long-Range Orbital Transport and Giant Orbital Torque. Commun. Phys. 2023;6(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s42005-023-01139-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang W., Han W., Yang S., Sun Y., Zhang Y., Yan B., Parkin S. S. P.. Giant Facet-Dependent Spin-Orbit Torque and Spin Hall Conductivity in the Triangular Antiferromagnet IrMn3 . Science Advances. 2016;2:e1600759. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondou K., Chen H., Tomita T., Ikhlas M., Higo T., MacDonald A. H., Nakatsuji S., Otani Y.. Giant Field-like Torque by the out-of-Plane Magnetic Spin Hall Effect in a Topological Antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):6491. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26453-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai H., Zhou X. F., Zhang H. W., Kong W. W., Liao L. Y., Feng X. Y., Chen X. Z., You Y. F., Zhou Y. J., Han L., Zhu W. X., Pan F., Fan X. L., Song C.. Control of Spin-Orbit Torques through Magnetic Symmetry in Differently Oriented Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Mn3Pt. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;104(10):104401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.104401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hu S., Shao D.-F., Yang H., Pan C., Fu Z., Tang M., Yang Y., Fan W., Zhou S., Tsymbal E. Y., Qiu X.. Efficient Perpendicular Magnetization Switching by a Magnetic Spin Hall Effect in a Noncollinear Antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):4447. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32179-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holanda J., Saglam H., Karakas V., Zang Z., Li Y., Divan R., Liu Y., Ozatay O., Novosad V., Pearson J. E., Hoffmann A.. Magnetic Damping Modulation in IrMn3/Ni80Fe20 via the Magnetic Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020;124(8):087204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.087204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bangar H., Khan K. I. A., Kumar A., Chowdhury N., Muduli P. K., Muduli P. K.. Large Spin Hall Conductivity in Epitaxial Thin Films of Kagome Antiferromagnet Mn3Sn at Room Temperature. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2023;6(1):2200115–2200115. doi: 10.1002/qute.202200115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar A., Gupta P., Chowdhury N., Khan K. I. A., Shashank U., Gupta S., Fukuma Y., Chaudhary S., Muduli P. K.. Interfacial Origin of Unconventional Spin-Orbit Torque in Py/Γ-IrMn3 . Adv. Quantum Technol. 2023;6(7):2300092. doi: 10.1002/qute.202300092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Okamoto S., Nagaosa N.. Critical Enhancement of the Spin Hall Effect by Spin Fluctuations. npj Quantum Materials. 2024;9:29. doi: 10.1038/s41535-024-00631-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

