Skip to main content
Annals of African Medicine logoLink to Annals of African Medicine
. 2025 Mar 7;24(2):324–331. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_191_24

Echocardiographic Assessment of Structure and Function of Left Ventricle in Chronic Kidney Disease Along with its Determinants in a Tertiary Healthcare Center in Tribal Region of Jharkhand

Anchal Kujur 1, Siddharth Kapoor 1, Usha Saroj 1, Abhay Kumar 1,, Stuti Srishti 1, Sujeet Anand 1, Gregory Minj 1, Ajit Dungdung 1, Shishir Kumar Mahato 2
PMCID: PMC12103114  PMID: 40053432

Abstract

Introduction:

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a complex pathophysiologic process that leads to irreversible changes in kidney structure and function. The left ventricle (LV) remodeling, which is evident as LV hypertrophy (LVH) is highly prevalent in patients with CKD even in the early stages and has a strong association with cardiovascular mortality, multiple studies have suggested that there is a strong association between high albuminuria and LVH, which was found to be independent of low GFR, hypertension, and diabetes. The most commonly used noninvasive method for estimating cardiac function and size is 2D echocardiography. It has the benefit of being portable, available, and providing images of the heart in real time. In CKD patients, echo is the most important noninvasive method for predicting cardiovascular risk.

Materials and Methods:

This was a cross-sectional observational study approved by the institutional ethics committee through memo no. 210/IEC, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) dated October 3rd, 2023. The study was conducted on patients with CKD admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine at RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand between November 2023 and July 2024. Taking the prevalence of 6.3%, the sample size comes out to be 95, and we have taken 114 patients for our study. Data were collected using Google Forms, and a template was generated in an Microsoft Excel sheet. SPSS software version 22.0 and JAMOVI software version 2.3 were used for data analysis. A Chi-square test with Fisher’s exact test for cells <5 was applied for the test of significance between variables. A multivariate analysis was performed for associations between variables. P ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

The study was conducted on 114 patients, of whom 69% were males and 31% were females. Among comorbidities, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, dyslipidemia and alcohol were studied. The majority of cases (63%) belonged to CKD Stage 5 compared to other stages of CKD. Most of the cases (33%) had a moderate reduction in the LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and 52% of the cases had concentric hypertrophy. Grade 1 LV diastolic dysfunction was the most common (76%). In Stage 5 CKD, 43% of the patients had a moderate decrease in the LVEF. Using the Chi-square test, a significant association was found between CKD stages and LVEF (P ≤ 0.023). The relationship between different variables and LVEF in the participants was evaluated, and the Chi-square test was used to determine the P value. P ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Alcohol, albuminuria, and dyslipidemia were found to be significant determinants of LVEF. Multinominal logistic regression analysis was applied to the above variables, and all three variables, including alcohol, albuminuria, and dyslipidemia, came out to be significant determinants of LVEF in patients with CKD.

Conclusion:

Cardiovascular deaths in CKD are alarmingly high. Echo is an effective way to identify changes in the LV as the disease progresses. Diastolic dysfunction noted in CKD in its early stages can cause diastolic failure and tends to worsen with an increase in the left ventricular mass index. Attributable independent risk factors for the worsening of LV dysfunction are alcohol, albuminuria, and dyslipidemia in our study, with a significant association. The initial diagnosis of LVH, systolic and diastolic dysfunction, as well as albuminuria, and early intervention can prevent cardiac deaths in patients with CKD.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease, ECHO, LVDD, left ventricle ejection fraction, left ventricle hypertrophy

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a complex pathophysiologic process that leads to irreversible changes in kidney structure and function. CKD is commonly defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for more than 3 months, where eGFR can be calculated from measurement of serum creatinine values and using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation or the Cockcroft–Gault formula.[1,2] The prevalence of CKD in the Indian adult population is 10.2%. Participants in the screening and early evaluation of kidney disease study have shown the maximum prevalence of 17.2% of CKD patients, whereas the minimum (4.2%) was found in the population of Delhi of >20 years of age.[3,4] Between 30 and 45% of those patients who do reach Stage 5 CKD have advanced significant cardiovascular complications, which contribute to higher morbidity. CKD-related risk factors include anemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperparathyroidism, increased FGF-23, sleep apnea, and systemic inflammation, which accelerates vascular occlusive disease. The low levels of ferritin cause more rapid vascular calcification, especially in the background of hyperphosphatemia, which further adds to the vascular obstruction.[5] Left ventricular remodeling is evident as LV hypertrophy (LVH), which is highly prevalent in patients with CKD even in the early stages and is strongly associated with cardiovascular mortality. There is a prevalence of 30-70% of LVH in CKD patients, while the prevalence rises to 70% in the non-dialysis patients. LVH, CAD, microvascular changes, myocardial fibrosis, neurohormonal changes, and imbalances in fluid and electrolyte metabolism are the important factors that influence the diastolic function in CKD.[6] Many studies have suggested a strong association between high albuminuria and LVH, which was found to be independent from low GFR, hypertension, and diabetes.[7] The development of diastolic dysfunction indicates the presence of myocardial fibrosis and decreased ventricular compliance, which eventually leads to diastolic heart failure.[8] Parameters, like E/A, i.e., the ratio of early mitral inflow peak velocity, E wave, to mitral inflow peak velocity with atrial contraction, A wave and E/E’, i.e., the ratio of E wave to early mitral annulus tissue Doppler velocity, E’, have been assessed for diastolic dysfunction.[9] Sudden cardiac death, linked to abnormal electrical conduction in the distorted ventricle, is a prominent mortal event in patients receiving conventional thrice-weekly hemolysis. The most commonly used noninvasive method for the estimation of cardiac function and size is 2D echocardiography. It has the benefit of being portable, available, and providing images of the heart in real time. In CKD patients, echocardiography is the most important noninvasive method for predicting cardiovascular risk and hence the management of the same.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and setting

This was a cross-sectional observational study approved by the institutional ethics committee through memo no. 210/IEC, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) dated October 3rd, 2023. Data were collected from patients with CKD admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine at RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand.

Study duration

The study duration was November 2023 to July 2024, for 9 months.

Sample size

According to Varma, in India, the prevalence of CKD is 6.3%.[10]

Sample size calculation

n = 4pQ/d2, where P (prevalence) =6.3% =0.63. Q [1-p]) = (1–0.63) =0.937 d (precision) =5% =0.5. Sample size in numbers: n = 94.4 ⁓ 95.

Study population

Inclusion criteria

All the patients above 18 years of age with a symptomatic kidney disease of duration more than 3 months, established through imaging, biopsy, or biochemical markers. All patients who gave their consent for the study were included in the study. History of prior underlying insults resulting in chronicity.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients unwilling to give consent

  2. CKD due to obstructive uropathy

  3. Patients with structural heart disease

  4. CKD due to a genetic or inherited disease

  5. Children, adolescent age group < 18 years of age, pregnant females, malignancy, or any immunosuppressive agents.

Operational definitions

The diagnosis of CKD was made after thorough history taking, clinical examination, and biochemical and radiological evidence of CKD by ultrasonography.

The blood sample was drawn within 24 h of admission in the hospital and sent for a complete blood count, for which the sample was mixed thoroughly on a blood roller mixer and then analyzed through Sysmex XT 2000i that uses fluorescence flow cytometry technology for hematological assessment of blood sample. The renal function test was measured by ARCHITECT i1000SR based on the chemiflex method. Echocardiograms were recorded using phased-array echocardiography and patients were examined in the left lateral position. A standardized protocol under which the apical four-chamber view and parasternal window was used to record ≥10 consecutive beats of 2-dimensional and M mode recordings and the following measurements were made:

  • Left ventricular internal diameters in diastole

  • Interventricular septum thickness in systole

  • Left ventricular volume in diastole and systole

  • Ejection fraction.

Echocardiographic parameters for analysis in CKD patients include interventricular septum and systolic measurement along with measurement of LV end diastole and LV posterior wall measurement will be used in the calculation of ejection fraction of the LV and left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Transmitral early diastolic low velocity (E) and late flow velocity (A) and their ratio of E/A, along with deceleration time (DT), isovolumic relaxation time, and pulmonary vein flow velocities, will determine the diastolic function of the heart. The above parameters are used to classify diastolic dysfunction of the heart into three types: Grade 1 (impaired relaxation; E/A <0.8), Grade 2 (pseudo normalization; E/A 0.8–1.5), and Grade 3 (restriction; E/A >2).[11]

Analysis plan: Analysis was done using SPSS software version 22.0 (IBM® SPSS® STATISTICS SOFTWARE Version 30.0.0) and JAMOVI software version 2.3 (The jamovi project (2024). jamovi (Version 2.5) [Computer Software]). Appropriate statistical tests were applied according to the data type. Quantitative data were expressed in the form of a mean and a standard deviation. A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out, and the results were categorized across various values and described accordingly. A Chi-square test with Fisher’s exact test for cells <5 was applied for the test of significance between variables. Multivariate analysis was performed for associations between variables. P ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Human participant’s population: This work was done following the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS

Table 1 signifies that 41% of the total cases belonged to the age 41–60 years and 39% were of >60 years. Sixty-nine percent were males, whereas 31% were females. The table signifies that 43% of the cases had mild anemia, whereas 18% had severe anemia. Among comorbidities, 67.5% had hypertension, 47.4% had diabetes, and 44% had dyslipidemia. Thirteen percent of the cases were addicted to smoking and 11% had alcohol addiction. Maximum cases (63%) belonged to CKD Stage 5 compared to other stages of CKD. Most of the cases (33%) had a moderate reduction of LVEF and 52% of the cases had concentric hypertrophy. Grade 1 LV diastolic dysfunction was most seen in the cases (76%).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the participants

Variables Value Frequency (%)
Age 18–40 22 (19)
41–60 47 (41)
>60 45 (39)
Gender Female 35 (31)
Male 79 (69)
Anaemia Mild 49 (43)
Moderate (10–7) 44 (39)
Severe (<7) 21 (18)
HTN Yes 77 (68)
No 37 (33)
Diabetes Yes 54 (47)
No 62 (53)
Dyslipidaemia No 64 (56)
Yes 50 (44)
Smoking No 99 (87)
Yes 15 (13)
Alcohol No 101 (89)
Yes 13 (11)
GFR G1 >90 9 (8)
G2 60–90 1 (1)
G3 30–59 10 (9)
G4 14–29 22 (19)
G5 <15 72 (63)
LVEF (%) Normal >50 31 (27)
Mild 40–49 28 (25)
Moderate 30–39 38 (33)
Severe <30 17 (15)
LVDF Impaired relaxation E/A <0.8 87 (76)
Pseudo normalisation 0.8–1.5 4 (4)
Restriction >2 18 (16)
Normal 5 (4)
LVMI Concentric hypertrophy 59 (52)
Concentric remodelling 10 (9)
Eccentric hypertrophy 40 (35)
Normal 5 (4)

GFR=Glomerular filtration rate, LVEF=Left ventricular ejection fraction, LVDF=Left ventricular diastolic function, LVMI=Left ventricular mass index, HTN=Hypertension

Table 2 shows age-wise distribution of CKD. In the age group, 18–60 years 14 out of 22 patients had CKD Stage 5, whereas in the age group 41–60 years 28 out of 47 patients had CKD Stage 5 and in the age group >60 years 30 out of 65 patients had CKD Stage 5. In total, we had 114 patients in our study out of which 72 patients had CKD Stage 5.

Table 2.

Age distribution in chronic kidney disease stages

Age wise distribution in CKD
CKD stages
1 2 3 4 5 Total
Age range
18–40
  Count 3 0 2 3 14 22
  Percentage within age range 13.60 0.00 9.10 13.60 63.60 100
41–60
  Count 4 0 4 11 28 47
  Percentage within age range 8.50 0 8.50 23.40 59.60 100
>60
  Count 2 1 4 8 30 45
  Percentage within age range 4.40 2.20 8.90 17.80 66.70 100
Total
  Count 9 1 10 22 72 114
  Percentage within age range 7.90 0.90 8.80 19.30 63.20 100

CKD=Chronic kidney disease

Table 3 shows the relationship between different variables and LVEF in the participants. The Chi-square test was used to determine the P value, P ≤ 0.05 was taken significant.

Table 3.

Frequency of determinants and Pearson Chi-square test for each

LVEF
Variables Value Normal >50% Mild 40%–49% Moderate 30%–39% Severe <30% χ 2 df P
Age 18–40 10 3 5 4 8.32 6 0.215
41–60 9 16 16 6
>60 12 9 17 7
Gender Male 20 23 24 12 3.19 3 0.36
Female 11 5 14 5
Anemia Mild (10–12) 16 14 14 5 4.24 6 0.64
Moderate (7–10) 11 10 16 7
Severe (<7) 4 4 8 5
HTN Yes 19 17 29 12 2.55 3 0.46
No 12 11 9 5
Diabetes Yes 12 11 24 7 5.73 3 0.127
No 19 17 14 10
Dyslipidemia Yes 25 14 15 10 12.3 3 0.006
No 9 14 23 7
Smoking Yes 1 4 7 3 33.93 33 00.26
No 30 24 31 14
Alcohol Yes 0 6 4 3 7.46 3 0.059
No 31 22 34 14
Albuminuria (mg/g) <30 17 13 6 3 18.1 6 0.006
30–300 12 10 19 9
>300 2 5 13 5

LVEF=Left ventricle ejection fraction, HTN=Hypertension, df=Degree of freedom

From Table 3, alcohol, albuminuria, and dyslipidemia were found to be significant determinants of LVEF.

Tables 4 and 5 and Figure 1 signify the LVEF among the various stages of CKD. Sixty-six percent of patients with Stage 1 CKD had normal ejection fraction, whereas 11% had mild reduction in LVEF and 22% of them had a moderate decrease in ejection fraction. Only 1 patient was observed in Stage 2 who had a normal ejection fraction. In Stage 3, 60% of the patients had mild reduction in the ejection fraction, and in Stage 4, a maximum number of patients were observed to have normal to mild reduction in LVEF (31.8%). In Stage 5 CKD, 43% of the patients had moderate decrease in LVEF. Using Chi-square test, a significant association was found between the CKD stages and LVEF (P < 0.023).

Table 4.

Crosstabulation of left ventricular ejection fraction and glomerular filtration rate

GFR × LVEF crosstabulation
LVEF
>50% 40%–49% 30%–39% <30% Total
CKD stages
>90
  Count 6 1 2 0 9
  Percentage within age range 66.70 11.10 22.20 0.00 100
60–90
  Count 1 0 0 0 1
  Percentage within age range 100.00 0 0 0 100
35–59
  Count 2 6 1 1 10
  Percentage within age range 20.00 60.00 10.00 10.00 100
15–29
  Count 7 7 4 4 22
  Percentage within age range 31.80 31.80 18.20 13.60 100
<15
  Count 15 14 31 12 72
  Percentage within age range 20.80 19 43.10 16.70 100
Total
  Count 31 28 38 17 114
  Percentage within age range 27.20 24.60 33.30 14.90 100

GFR=Glomerular filtration rate, LVEF=Left ventricular ejection fraction

Table 5.

Chi-square test correlation significance between glomerular filtration rate and left ventricular ejection fraction

Chi-square test
Value df P
χ 2 23.6 12 0.023
n 114

df=Degree of freedom

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bar graph showing left ventricular ejection fraction in stages of chronic kidney disease

Multinominal logistic regression analysis was applied to the significant variables of alcohol, albuminuria, and dyslipidemia as determinants of reduced LVEF in patients with CKD. The regression analysis is shown in the Tables 6 and 7.

Table 6.

Multinominal logistic regression analysis of significant variables

Parameter estimates
LVEF B SE Wald df P Adjusted OR 95% CI for Exp (B)
Lower bound Upper bound
Aluminuria=1
Albuminuria=2
−1.236 0.904 1.871 1 0.171 0.291 0.049 1.708
Dyslipidemia=1
Dyslipidemia=2
1.312 0.612 4.592 1 0.032 3.7112 1.118 12.322
Alcohol=1
Alcohol=2
19.989 0.800 6.829 1 0.000 4.685 2.151 6.599
Albuminuria=1
Albuminuria=2
−2.014 0.834 5.834 1 0.016 0.134 0.026 0.684
Dyslipidemia=1
Dyslipidemia=2
1.749 0.583 8.990 1 0.003 5.747 1.832 18.026
Alcohol=1
Alcohol=2
19.183 0.849 5.803 1 0.000 2.714 1.310 3.960
Albuminuria=1
Albuminuria=2
−1.907 0.919 4.307 1 0.038 0.149 0.025 0.899
Dyslipidemia=1
Dyslipidemia=2
0.923 0.696 1.758 1 0.185 2.518 0.643 9.856
Alcohol=1
Alcohol=2
19.884 0.000 6.982 1 0.000 4.696 1.696 7.696

LVEF=Left ventricular ejection fraction, CI=Confidence interval, df=Degree of freedom, SE=Standard error, OR=Odds ratio

Table 7.

Likelihood ratio test

Effect Model fitting criteria - 2 log likelihood of reduced model Likelihood ratio test
χ 2 df Significant
Albuminuria 62.185 8.642 3 0.034
Dyslipidemia 64.093 10.550 3 0.014
Alcohol 63.592 10.050 3 0.018

df=Degree of freedom

Tables 6 and 7 signify that after the application of multinominal regression analysis, all the factors albuminuria, alcohol, and dyslipidemia had a significant impact on LVEF.

DISCUSSION

This study was aimed at assessing cardiac structural and functional alterations in different stages of CKD. The study was conducted in the department of medicine at RIMS, Ranchi. A total of 114 patients diagnosed with CKD were examined, and an echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and structure was done. In this observational study, 114 CKD patients were studied, of whom 69% were male and 31% were female. Out of the total patients, 41% were of age 41–60 years, and 39% were >60 years. The majority were >40 years of age. The majority of patients (63%) belonged to CKD Stage 5 with a GFR <15/MIN/1.73 M2, followed by Stage 4 (19%) and Stage 3 (9%). Out of 114 CKD patients, 68% had hypertension, 47% were known diabetics, and 44% had dyslipidemia. Eleven percent of the patients were addicted to alcohol, and 13% were addicted to smoking. Grade 1 diastolic dysfunction was more prevalent among the smokers (P < 0.05) LV systolic function in CKD. In this study, the systolic function, represented as the ejection fraction, had a significant relationship with stages of CKD, as evidenced by a statistically significant P < 0.5. Sixty-six percent of patients with Stage 1 CKD had a normal ejection fraction, whereas 11% had a mild reduction in LVEF, and 22% of them had a moderate decrease in the ejection fraction. In Stage 3, 60% of the patients had a mild reduction in the ejection fraction, and in Stage 4, 31.8% of patients were observed to have a normal to mild reduction in LVEF. In Stage 5 CKD, 43% of the patients had a moderate decrease in the LVEF. Using multivariate analysis, it was observed that LVEF was dependent on GFR (r = 0.293, P < 0.01). An ejection fraction of <40% was mostly seen in patients with HTN, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Thus, it can be concluded that a worsening ejection fraction was seen with progressive CKD stages. A similar result was also concluded by the CRIC study where ejection fraction significantly decreased in the advanced stages of CKD.[12] According to Hein et al., variations in eGFRwere more in patients with heart failure with or without reduced ejection fraction when compared with patients who had no heart failure.[13] However, the left ventricular dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction has also been recognized in patients of CKD which leads to HFpEF as well as HFrEF[14] LV structure in CKD. It was noted that the patients in later stages of CKD had increased prevalence of hypertrophy, both concentric and eccentric. Using multivariate analysis tests, correlations were established between GFR and LVMI (r = 0285, P = <0.01). Concentric hypertrophy was seen among all the stages in most of the patients. In Stage 3 patients, 40% of patients had concentric hypertrophy and another 40% had eccentric hypertrophy of the LV. In Stage 4, 45.5% of patients had concentric hypertrophy, and 31.8% had eccentric hypertrophy. In Stage 5, concentric hypertrophy (58.3%) was observed more than eccentric LVH. Twenty-two of the patients with stage 1 CKD had concentric remodeling of the LV, which was followed by Stage 4. In a study conducted on 318 CKD patients, the prevalence of LVH was seen to be up to 70% in the ESRD group.[15] According to Hsieh et al., decreased albumin, decreased eGFR, decreased blood pressure, and increased heart rate were associated significantly with both systolic and diastolic dysfunction of the heart.[16] As seen in the study conducted by Hoorn and Paoletti et al., an increase in LV mass was seen with declining renal function, as evidenced by an increase in LV diameter and wall thickness.[17,18] Observations made in the study conducted by Nardi et al. also had similar results and concluded that inappropriate LV mass was more prevalent in hypertensive patients.[19] About 39% of patients who presented with CVD already had a GFR less than albuminuria and LV function and structure. An association of albuminuria with increased LVMI and higher rates of concentric hypertrophy was observed in diabetic kidney disease. An independent association between microalbuminuria, systolic blood pressure, and the use of ACE/ARB inhibitors was seen with LVMI.[20] It was observed that patients with albuminuria >300 mg/ml had an ejection fraction of 30 mg/ml, where Grade 1 (impaired relaxation) was more common than grade 3 (restriction) dysfunction. However, diastolic dysfunction and albuminuria were found to be independent of each other, with an insignificant P > 0.05. A higher prevalence of LVH in patients with albuminuria was also observed (r = 0.295, P < 0.01) in LV function and structure in nondialysis patients. In the study, it was observed that LVH was more prevalent among the non-dialysis patients (P < 0.05). Concentric LVH was more commonly noted than eccentric hypertrophy. Reduced ejection fraction < 40% was observed more in patients not undergoing dialysis than in dialysis patients (P < 0.05). A dependent relation between diastolic dysfunction and nondialysis dependent patients could not be established. However, Grade 1 diastolic dysfunction was more prevalent among the nondialysis dependent patients.

Limitations of the study

Echocardiography of critically ill patients requiring ICU could not be done due to a lack of bedside facilities. It may be necessary to reproduce these findings in a larger cohort to establish better outcomes and results. Most of the patients presenting to the hospital were in stages 4–5, so the findings could not be justified in the earlier stages of CKD as well.

CONCLUSION

Cardiovascular deaths in CKD are alarmingly high. Echocardiography is an effective way to identify changes in the LV as the disease progresses. LVEF is calculated by Simpson’s formula. On echocardiography, LVEF tends to worsen with declining GFR, which is attributed to the high prevalence of heart failure in the later stages of CKD. Diastolic dysfunction noted in CKD in its early stages can cause diastolic failure and tends to worsen with an increase in LVMI. Patients with albuminuria signify ongoing endothelial damage and inflammation, which can be seen with higher rates of LV systolic dysfunction in our study. Other attributable independent risk factors in the worsening of LV dysfunction are alcohol and dyslipidemia in our study, with a significant association. Early diagnosis of LVH, systolic and diastolic dysfunction, as well as albuminuria, and early intervention can prevent cardiac deaths in patients with CKD. Hence, we suggest that 2D-Echo be done in all patients with CKD, irrespective of any cardiovascular manifestation, so that early detection and intervention in a timely manner can reduce cardiovascular mortality in patients with CKD.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

Nil.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Braunwald E. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2015. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine; p. 1028. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Kidney Int. 2005;67:2089–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singh AK, Farag YM, Mittal BV, Subramanian KK, Reddy SR, Acharya VN, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of chronic kidney disease in India – Results from the SEEK (screening and early evaluation of kidney disease) study. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Singh NP, Ingle GK, Saini VK, Jami A, Beniwal P, Lal M, et al. Prevalence of low glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria and associated risk factors in North India using Cockcroft-Gault and modification of diet in renal disease equation: An observational, cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2009;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-10-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Loscalzo J. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2022. Harriso’s Principles of Internal Medicine. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Franczyk-Skóra B, Gluba A, Olszewski R, Banach M, Rysz J. Heart function disturbances in chronic kidney disease – Echocardiographic indices. Arch Med Sci. 2014;10:1109–16. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.47822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matsushita K, Ballew SH, Coresh J. Influence of chronic kidney disease on cardiac structure and function. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17:581. doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0581-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardio graph y. 2012. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2650641/ [Last accessed on 2024 Feb 02]
  • 9.Currie G, Delles C. Proteinuria and its relation to cardiovascular disease. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2013;7:13–24. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S40522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Varma PP, Raman DK, Ramakrishnan TS, Singh P, Varma A. Prevalence of early stages of chronic kidney disease in apparently healthy central government employees in India. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:3011–7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dohi K. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac structure and function in chronic renal disease. J Echocardiogr. 2019;17:115–22. doi: 10.1007/s12574-019-00436-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bansal N, Keane M, Delafontaine P, Dries D, Foster E, Gadegbeku CA, et al. A longitudinal study of left ventricular function and structure from CKD to ESRD: The CRIC study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:355–62. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06020612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hein AM, Scialla JJ, Sun JL, Greene SJ, Shaw LK, Chiswell K, et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate variability in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease. J Card Fail. 2021;27:1175–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mark PB, Mangion K, Rankin AJ, Rutherford E, Lang NN, Petrie MC, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction: The most common left ventricular disorder in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin Kidney J. 2022;15:2186–99. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Levin A, Thompson CR, Ethier J, Carlisle EJ, Tobe S, Mendelssohn D, et al. Left ventricular mass index increase in early renal disease: Impact of decline in hemoglobin. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34:125–34. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hsieh MC, Su HM, Wang SY, Tsai DH, Lin SD, Chen SC, et al. Significant correlation between left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and decreased glomerular filtration rate. Ren Fail. 2011;33:977–82. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2011.618792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paoletti E, De Nicola L, Gabbai FB, Chiodini P, Ravera M, Pieracci L, et al. Associations of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry with adverse outcomes in patients with CKD and hypertension. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:271–9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06980615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Henry RM, Kamp O, Kostense PJ, Spijkerman AM, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, et al. Mild renal insufficiency is associated with increased left ventricular mass in men, but not in women: An arterial stiffness-related phenomenon – The Hoorn study. Kidney Int. 2005;68:673–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nardi E, Palermo A, Mulè G, Cusimano P, Cottone S, Cerasola G. Left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. J Hypertens. 2009;27:633–41. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283220ecd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu N, Zhao W, Ye K, Li Y, He M, Lu B, et al. Albuminuria is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with early diabetic kidney disease. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:351945. doi: 10.1155/2014/351945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of African Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES