In the published article, there was an error in the Results, Small Barnes maze search strategy analysis, Paragraph 2. One statistical result (chi square value) reported in the text was incorrect.
This sentence previously stated:
“A chi-square test for independence revealed that the frequencies of spatial, serial, and mixed strategies were different between training days 1 and 8 for control mice (χ2 (2, N = 64) = 11.22, p < 0.01) and tilted mice (χ2 (2, N = 64) = 6.68, p < 0.05).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“A chi-square test for independence revealed that the frequencies of spatial, serial, and mixed strategies were different between training days 1 and 8 for control mice [χ2 (2, N = 64) = 11.22, p < 0.01] and tilted mice [χ2 (2, N = 64) = 9.18, p < 0.05].”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.