Skip to main content
BMC Ophthalmology logoLink to BMC Ophthalmology
. 2025 May 30;25:319. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04154-0

Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of pingyangmycin for periorbital lymphatic malformations

Yixiao Li 1, Liang Wang 2,3, Dan Song 2,3, Bingxuan Jiao 2,3, Jing Li 2,3, Jie Zhou 2,3, Lei Guo 2,3,
PMCID: PMC12123770  PMID: 40448049

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the treatment outcomes of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy with pingyangmycin for periorbital lymphatic malformations (LMs).

Method

A retrospective study of patients with periorbital LMs who underwent ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy in our department between 2017 and 2024 was conducted.

Results

One boy and seven girls with periorbital LMs were analyzed. Four cases had intraorbital lesions, two cases had lesions of the eyelids, and two cases had mixed lesions. Eight children underwent 13 sclerotherapy sessions, fluid was able to be withdrawn with a median amount of aspirate of 2 ml. After treatment, one of the eight children was lesion not seen on imaging, six showed strong improvement, and one showed weak improvement. None of the children experienced procedure-related adverse reactions.

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy is a treatment modality for periorbital LMs with good efficacy and few potential risks.

Keywords: Lymphatic malformations, Periorbital, Sclerotherapy, Ultrasound-guided, Pingyangmycin

Synopsis

Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy with Pingyangmycin is a treatment modality for periorbital LMs with good efficacy and few potential risks.

Background

The incidence of lymphatic malformations (LMs), a slow-flow vascular malformation, is approximately 1.2–2.8 per 1000 births [1]. Periorbital LMs is a rare lesion that invades the orbit, eyelids, and conjunctiva, which account for 46.5% of periorbital vascular anomalies [2]. In addition, 9% of large cervicofacial LMs extend to the orbital region [3]. Most periorbital LMs have intraorbital and periorbital components, and are usually insinuated between normal orbital structures, causing bone remodeling and anomalies [4]. The typical clinical manifestations of periorbital LMs in children include proptosis, ptosis, extraocular motility restriction, swelling, compression of the optic nerve, and amblyopia [3, 57].

Treatments for periorbital LMs include surgical resection, sclerotherapy and sirolimus, which have not yet been standardized because of their low prevalence. In this article, we summarize the clinical data of 8 cases of periorbital LMs treated with ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy, with the aim of providing an evidence-based approach for the treatment of periorbital LMs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with periorbital LMs who underwent ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy in our department between 2017 and 2024. The diagnosis of LMs was established based on clinical symptoms and ultrasound (US), and the condition of the LMs was further visualized using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Children’s Hospital Affiliated with Shandong University (SDFE-IRB/T-2024023) and written informed consent to participate was obtained from their parents or legal guardians. The patient records included age, sex, lesion side, symptoms, complications, therapy, prognosis, and serious adverse reactions. Children with poor compliance or incomplete data were excluded.

All patients underwent sclerotherapy under general anesthesia performed by experienced interventional radiologists. All sclerotherapy operations were performed under ultrasound guidance, including puncture of the lesion, aspiration of the cystic fluid, and sclerosant injection. And intraoperative care was taken to avoid injecting sclerosant into the normal periorbital tissue outside the lesion. The sclerosant used in this study was pingyangmycin, which was given injection for cystic lesions mixed with dexamethasone and iodixanol (a contrast agent) at a concentration of 2 mg/ml: pingyangmycin 8 mg + dexamethasone 2 mg/1 ml + iodixanol 3 ml after aspiration of cystic fluid. For microcystic lesions, sclerotherapy was carried out infiltrative injection of a low concentration of pingyangmycin (concentration of 0.5 mg/ml: pingyangmycin 8 mg + dexamethasone 2 mg/1 ml + iodixanol 15 ml). The purpose of mixing pingyangmycin with dexamethasone is to minimize potential allergic and other risks, and dexamethasone is unlikely to affect other mechanisms of action of sclerosant [8]. And the maximum pingyangmycin dose should not exceed 8 mg per sclerotherapy session [9]. After the sclerotherapy operation was completed, single-frame radiography was performed to observe whether the contrast agent morphology was consistent with the MRI morphology (Iodixanol was added when preparing the pingyangmycin solution, making it visible during radiography).

All children were routinely administered prophylactic hemostatic medication (“Hemocoagulase Atrox for Injection” at a dosage of 0.25–0.5 IU) for two days postoperatively, and symptomatic treatments for swelling, dry eye, and eye irritation were administered when necessary. If additional treatment was required, the procedure was repeated in appropriately 4–6 weeks.

The evaluation of treatment response in this study was accomplished primarily through objective imaging evidence, such as US or MRI comparisons before and after treatment. It was conducted by a professional doctor who did not participate in this study. An overall evaluation percentage (0% = no change to 100% = lesion not seen on imaging; improvement in volume was considered weak between 0 and 20%, moderate between 20 and 50%, and strong when ≥ 50% was recorded [10].

Results

A total of 1140 children with LMs were recorded, including 511 in the head and neck. After careful screening, a total of 9 children with periorbital LMs which received ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy had clinical data. However, one patient had extensive maxillofacial LMs with eyelid involvement and received sclerotherapy for the maxillofacial LMs only, without treatment of the periorbital LMs, and was excluded.

In total, 8 cases (1 boy and 7 girls) with periorbital LMs were analyzed, the median age at presentation was 5.5 years (range: 2 months − 11 years)with a median weight of 21 kg (range: 11.5–43 kg). Six cases involved the right side and two involved the left side. And Four cases were intraorbital lesions, two cases were lesions of the eyelids, and two cases were mixed lesions. Six children presented suddenly and had a short duration of illness, whereas two had a long duration of illness. All children presented with localized swelling, in addition to proptosis in 3 cases, conjunctival congestion/edema in 2 cases, optic nerve compression in 2 cases, ptosis in 1 case, difficulty opening the eyes in 1 case, ocular compression in 1 case, and a combination of decreased visual acuity and blurred vision in 1 case. Table 1 lists the treatment details of the patients.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics, clinical features, and treatment in children with periorbital LMs

Case Demographic characteristics Subtypes symptoms of presentations previous treatment Intraoperative fluid volume(ml) Efficacy evaluation
Sex Years Medical history Reason for referral Accompanying symptoms Initial dimensions of lesion (cm) Final dimensions of lesion(cm) Follow up Outcome
1 F 25 M 15 D intraorbital + eyelid intracystic hemorrhage swelling none 2 1.3 × 2.3 0.6 × 2 6.5 M strong
2 F 10Y 7 D intraorbital intracystic hemorrhage swelling, conjunctival congestion, ocular compression none 2

2.9 × 2.5 × 1.9

(Fig. 2A)

0

(Fig. 2B)

2.5 M lesion not seen on imaging
3 F 3Y 2 M intraorbital intracystic hemorrhage swelling, ptosis, optic nerve compression none 5 2.8 × 3.5 × 2.3 2.0 × 2.2 × 1.6 1 M strong
4 F 11Y 11 Y eyelid lesions swelling none 0.5 1.1 × 0.6 × 0.5 0.9 × 0.6 × 0.5 1 M weak
5 F 7Y 5 Y intraorbital + eyelid intracystic hemorrhage swelling none 3(1st ), 1(2nd ), 1(3rd ) 3.2 × 2.2 × 2.1 1.3 × 0.7 × 0.6 1.5 M strong
6 F 14 M 1 M intraorbital intracystic hemorrhage swelling, proptosis, conjunctival edema, difficulty opening eyes none 10(1st ), 2(2nd ) 2.4 × 1.7 × 1.5 1.8 × 0.7 × 0.6 3 W strong
7 M 4Y 7 D intraorbital intracystic hemorrhage swelling, proptosis, optic nerve compression, decreased visual acuity, blurred vision none 0.5(1st ), 0.5(2nd ), 0.5(3rd ) 2.5 × 1.8 × 1.3 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 4.5 M strong
8 F 11Y 20 D eyelid intracystic hemorrhage swelling none 2 3.1 × 2.0 × 1.8 1.4 × 0.6 × 0.4 2.5 M strong

Note M: male, F: female, Y: year, M: month, W: week, intraorbital: lesions within the orbit (intra- and extra-conal), Follow up: the time interval between last procedure and the follow up imaging

Eight children received 13 sclerotherapy sessions (5 cases received 1 session, 1 case received 2 sessions, and 2 cases received 3 sessions). During sclerotherapy, the lymphatic fluid of all patients was aspirated under ultrasound guidance with a median return of 2 ml (range: 0.5–10 ml). Notably, in the evaluation of efficacy with postoperative imaging (Fig. 1), 1 case was lesion not seen on imaging after treatment, 6 cases showed strong improvement, and 1 case showed weak improvement. None of the children experienced procedure-related adverse reactions.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Volumetric response rate with periorbital LMs

Fig. 2B.

Fig. 2B

The lesions disappeared after one course of sclerotherapy

Discussion

Observation is acceptable for periorbital LMs with mild, nonprogressive symptoms without any functional impairment [5, 11]. However, owing to intracystic hemorrhage, venous thrombosis, inflammation, or proliferation of the internal lymphoid tissue, LMs may abruptly enlarge and cause pain, swelling, proptosis, ocular dysmotility, acute visual loss (due to hemorrhage or thrombosis and optic nerve compression), or even keratopathy [7, 12]. In our study, all children presented with periorbital swelling and 7 cases had LMs combined with intracystic hemorrhage. Other manifestations included ptosis, proptosis, ocular compression, difficulty in opening the eyes, optic nerve compression, and loss of visual acuity, which are generally consistent with previous reports.

Surgical excision of LMs remains an option and should be tailored according to the location, depth, and relationship between the periorbital structures and vascular structures [1315]. However, it is often not recommended because of its irregular, non-encapsulated, infiltrative nature and proximity to surrounding structures [16]. Compared to surgical resection, sclerotherapy is not only a less invasive therapeutic option, but also a faster recovery [5, 17]. A meta-analysis of 13 studies and a total of 154 patients showed that after sclerotherapy, the rate of complete cure was 54.9%, emergency decompressive surgery was 3.4%, and vision loss was 2.7% [18]. Although the sample size was relatively small in our study, the eight children with LMs in this study underwent a total of 13 sclerotherapy sessions, which showed a significant improvement rate of 87.5% (7/8).

Bleomycin is one of the most widely used in the sclerotherapy of LMs [19], and it was first used as a sclerosant for periorbital LMs in 2012 [20]. Intralesional bleomycin injection is an effective treatment for inducing fibrosis and facilitating the surgical debulking of periorbital LMs [21]. Among patients with periorbital LMs who received bleomycin sclerotherapy, 93% achieved excellent or good results [22]. Pingyangmycin, was also known as bleomycin A5, was first reported for the clinical treatment of vascular malformations in 1991 in China [9]. It has been reported to be as effective as bleomycin with the advantage of fewer complications [11]. In this study, pingyangmycin was used in all cases. In addition to achieving a relatively favorable prognosis, no significant drug-related adverse effects were observed in any child.

The main challenge in sclerotherapy for periorbital LMs is to ensure that it safely accesses the retroorbital space [23]. US has emerged as an invaluable tool during sclerotherapy [24], and using ultrasound to precisely guide the injection should also be considered main factor for the encouraging outcome in this study. LM presents on ultrasound as ill-defined and mostly anechoic lesions. In cases of recent hemorrhage or infection, US imaging may be more heterogeneous, and fluid-to-fluid levels may have developed [12]. Notably, excessive probing and manipulation should be avoided during sclerotherapy [23].

Ipsilateral intracranial developmental venous anomalies have been reported to be associated with periorbital LMs [3, 25]. In an imaging study involving 33 patients with periorbital LMs, 70% of the patients had different types of intracranial vascular malformations [26]. However, in this retrospective study, no information was queried regarding documentation.

Conclusion

Periorbital LMs seriously affect the ocular health of children. Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy is feasible for the management of periorbital LMs with good efficacy and few potential risks.

Acknowledgements

I would particularly like to acknowledge my team members for their wonderful collaboration and patient support.

Abbreviations

LMs

Lymphatic Malformations

US

Ultrasound

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Author contributions

Y.L. and L.W. wrote the main manuscript text, D.S. and B.J. and J.L. collected the data, J.Z. prepared figures 2 A-B and L.G. conducted the experimental design. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Fig. 2A.

Fig. 2A

A 10-year-old girl presented with a left periorbital LMs with intracystic hemorrhage on MRI, accompanied by mild compression of the globe

Funding

None.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Children’s Hospital Affiliated with Shandong University (SDFE-IRB/T-2024023) and written informed consent to participate was obtained from their parents or legal guardians. The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Saibene AM, Rosso C, Felisati G, et al. Sirolimus treatment for pediatric head and neck lymphatic malformations: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280(8):3529–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Torrado-Cobian LA, Griepentrog GJ, Hodge DO, Mohney BG. Prevalence and clinical features of orbital vascular anomalies in children. Orbit. 2023;42(6):598–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Greene AK, Burrows PE, Smith L, Mulliken JB. Periorbital lymphatic malformation: clinical course and management in 42 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(1):22–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nassiri N, Rootman J, Rootman DB, et al. Orbital lymphaticvenous malformations: current and future treatments. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(5):383–405. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lai KKH, Kwok YT, Lam SC, Lam MCW, Yuen HKL. Doxycycline sclerotherapy in patients with periorbital lymphatic malformation: A case series and literature review. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023;33(6):2170–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patel SR, Rosenberg JB, Barmettler A. Interventions for orbital lymphangioma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;5(5):CD013000. Published 2019 May 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tunç M, Sadri E,Char DH. Orbital lymphangioma: an analysis of 26 patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(1):76–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen WL, Huang ZQ, Chai Q, et al. Percutaneous sclerotherapy of massive macrocystic lymphatic malformations of the face and neck using fibrin glue with OK-432 and bleomycin. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(6):572–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zheng JW, Yang XJ, Wang YA, He Y, Ye WM, Zhang ZY. Intralesional injection of Pingyangmycin for vascular malformations in oral and maxillofacial regions: an evaluation of 297 consecutive patients. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(10):872–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu C, Song D, Guo L, Wang L. Refractory head and neck lymphatic malformation in infants treated with sirolimus: A case series. Front Oncol. 2021;11:616702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lam SC, Yuen HKL. Medical and sclerosing agents in the treatment of orbital lymphatic malformations: what’s new? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(5):380–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Colafati GS, Piccirilli E, Marrazzo A, et al. Vascular lesions of the pediatric orbit: A radiological walkthrough. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:734286. Published 2022 Nov 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lanni V, Iuliano A, Fossataro F, et al. The role of ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of orbital lesions. J Ultrasound. 2021;24(1):35–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lucio Fulvio Parentin P, Perissutti. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of orbital lymphangiomas. Ophthalmologica. 2001;215(3):238–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Uta Schick,Werner Hassler. Treatment of deep vascular orbital malformations. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009;111(10):801–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wiegand S, Wichmann G, Dietz A, Werner JA. Association between malformation type, location and functional deficits in lymphatic malformations of the head and neck in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280(5):2535–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rootman DB, Diniz SB, Cohen LM. Clinical assessment and Lesion-Specific management of orbital vascular malformations. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021;82(1):116–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.De Maria L, De Sanctis P, Tollefson M, et al. Sclerotherapy for low-flow vascular malformations of the orbital and periocular regions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020;65(1):41–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sun J, Wang C, Li J, et al. The efficacy of bleomycin sclerotherapy in the treatment of lymphatic malformations: a review and meta-analysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;89(4):101285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shen CY, Wu MC, Tyan YS, et al. Preliminary experience of percutaneous intralesional bleomycin injection for the treatment of orbital lymphatic venous malformation refractory to surgery. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:182–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Al-Faky YH, Alkatan HM. Histopathological changes of lymphatic malformation after bleomycin injection. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2023;86(4):372–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dave TV, Madhuri BK, Kaliki S. Intralesional bleomycin for orbital lymphatic malformations: comparison of clinical versus radiologic regression by volumetric analysis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;37(3S):S85–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abdelaziz O, Hassan F, Elessawy K, Emad-Eldin S, Essawy RE. Image-Guided percutaneous bleomycin and bevacizumab sclerotherapy of orbital lymphatic malformations in children. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(3):433–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Harmoush S, Chinnadurai P, El Salek K, et al. Multimodality Image-Guided sclerotherapy of Low-Flow orbital vascular malformations: report of Single-Center experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(7):987–e9954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Katz SE, Rootman J, Vangveeravong S, Graeb D. Combined venous lymphatic malformations of the orbit (so-called lymphangiomas). Association with noncontiguous intracranial vascular anomalies. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(1):176–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bisdorff A, Mulliken JB, Carrico J, Robertson RL, Burrows PE. Intracranial vascular anomalies in patients with periorbital lymphatic and lymphaticovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(2):335–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from BMC Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES