Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2025 May 30;14:RP101236. doi: 10.7554/eLife.101236

ACVR2A facilitates trophoblast cell invasion through TCF7/c-JUN pathway in pre-eclampsia progression

Shujing Yang 1,, Huanyao Liu 1,, Jieshi Hu 1, Binjun Chen 1, Wanlu An 1, Xuwen Song 1, Yi Yang 1,, Fang He 1,
Editors: Mark S Sharpley2, Kathryn Song Eng Cheah3
PMCID: PMC12124833  PMID: 40444773

Abstract

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a serious pregnancy disorder linked to genetic factors, particularly the ACVR2A gene, which encodes a receptor involved in the activin signaling pathway and plays a critical role in reproductive processes. Transcriptomic data analysis and experimental verification confirmed a downregulation of ACVR2A expression in placental tissues from PE patients. In this study, CRISPR/Cas9 technology was employed to investigate the effect of ACVR2A gene deletion on trophoblast cells using the HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell lines. Deletion of ACVR2A inhibits trophoblastic migration, proliferation, and invasion, underscoring its pivotal role in cellular function. RNA-seq data analysis unveiled an intricate regulatory network influenced by ACVR2A gene knockout, especially in the TCF7/c-JUN pathway. By employing RT-PCR and immunohistochemical analysis, a potential association between ACVR2A and the TCF7/c-JUN pathway was hypothesized and confirmed. The complexity of PE onset and the significance of genetic factors were emphasized, particularly the role of the ACVR2A gene identified in genome-wide association study. This study established a robust foundation for delving deeper into the intricate mechanisms of PE, paving the way for focused early intervention, personalized treatment, and enhanced obstetric healthcare.

Research organism: Human

Introduction

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-related disorder characterized by the onset of hypertension and proteinuria typically occurring after the 20th week of gestation (Chen et al., 2020). The clinical manifestations of PE range from asymptomatic high blood pressure detected during routine prenatal examinations to severe symptoms such as seizures, respiratory distress, upper abdominal discomfort, and evident placental abruption (Dimitriadis et al., 2023). Genetic factors are crucial in PE pathogenesis, with a positive family history being a significant risk factor (Chappell et al., 2021). Although the exact mechanisms of PE remain unclear, with suggested mechanisms including endothelial damage, excessive immune activation, nutritional deficiencies, genetic factors, and insulin resistance (Chappell et al., 2021; Gebara et al., 2021). The insufficient infiltration of trophoblasts, resulting in defective remodeling of uterine spiral arteries, widely recognized as a pivotal contributor to the pathogenesis of PE (Knöfler et al., 2019). Additionally, dysregulated immune responses, abnormal activation of the renin–angiotensin system activity, chronic inflammation, and platelet hyperactivation have been implicated in the progression of this condition (Ferreira et al., 2017; Daussin et al., 2008). Understanding the complex between these factors is essential for unraveling the mechanisms driving PE onset and progression and for developing effective therapeutic strategies (Dimitriadis et al., 2023).

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have significantly enhanced the understanding of the genetic underpinnings of complex diseases, including pregnancy complications such as PE, in recent years. By analyzing single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across millions of genetic loci in thousands of individuals, GWASs have successfully identified genetic markers associated with disease susceptibility (Hua, 2023). In the context of PE, GWASs has uncovered multiple risk loci linked to key biological processes, such as vascular development, blood pressure regulation, and immune response (Li et al., 2022). However, the genetic architecture of PE is highly complex, and the contribution of individual genetic variation is generally modest. Moreover, GWAS findings often require functional studies to validate their biological significance and to decipher the underlying pathological mechanisms. For example, identifying how specific risk loci, such as those associated with the ACVR2A gene, influence trophoblast behavior and placental function is essential for translating genetic insights into clinical applications.

Recent GWASs have highlighted the pivotal role of the ACVR2A gene in the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and PE (Yong et al., 2018a). Studies conducted across diverse populations, including the Philippines, Northeast Brazil, Australia/New Zealand, Norway, and China, have consistently demonstrated significant associations between ACVR2A gene polymorphisms and PE susceptibility (Ferreira et al., 2015; Yanan et al., 2020; Roten et al., 2009; Fitzpatrick et al., 2009; Amosco et al., 2019; Moses et al., 2006; Zeybek et al., 2013; Glotov et al., 2019). Located on chromosome 2q22, ACVR2A is a critical member of the receptor family mediating activin function within the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) ligand family, exerting diverse biological functions (Dean et al., 2017). Elevated levels of activin A, primarily secreted by the placenta, are well documented in the progression of HDP. ACVR2A plays an indispensable role in promoting endometrial decidualization and regulating the growth and development of the placenta and embryo (Yong et al., 2015). As a receptor for activin A, ACVR2A is crucial in reproductive processes, including decidualization, trophoblast invasion, and placental formation during pregnancy (Glotov et al., 2019). In addition to activin A, ACVR2A is also a receptor for other members of the TGF-β superfamily, including bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and other activins, with varying affinities and coreceptors. For instance, BMP2 has been shown to stimulate trophoblast invasion, at least in part via ACVR2A, suggesting a broader role for ACVR2A in trophoblast regulation (Zhao et al., 2018). These diverse interactions highlight the complexity of ACVR2A-mediated signaling in trophoblast differentiation and invasion, which merits further exploration. The receptor’s predominant expression in the endometrium, placenta, and vascular endothelial cells underscores its core role in pregnancy-related mechanisms (Lokki et al., 2011). Collectively, these findings support the hypothesis that ACVR2A gene polymorphisms may disrupt placental formation, contributing to early-onset PE. Future studies are warranted to elucidate the precise molecular mechanisms underlying ACVR2A dysfunction in PE and its potential as a therapeutic target.

Results

Downregulated expression of ACVR2A in PE tissues reveals a significant correlation

Several studies have established significant correlations between ACVR2A gene polymorphisms and the susceptibility to PE in different populations. Table 1 summarizes the key findings from these studies, highlighting the associations between various SNPs in the ACVR2A gene and the incidence of PE. These correlations suggest that genetic variations in ACVR2A may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of PE.

Table 1. ACVR2A gene polymorphisms and pre-eclampsia risk summary.

Study participants Associated SNPs p-value OR Nature of variant (s) Reference
150 PE cases and 175 controls;
Philippine women
rs1014064 0.556 0.8699 Intronic Amosco et al., 2019
rs2161983 0.4717 0.8921 Intronic
Rs1014064, Age, BMI 0.005 Intronic
443 PE cases and 693 controls; Brazil women; association with early-onset pre-eclampsia found after grouping in accordance to gestational age at delivery rs1424954 0.002 1.86 Promoter region Ferreira et al., 2015
rs1014064 0.004 1.77 Intronic
rs2161983 0.008 1.70 Intronic
rs3768687 0.039 1.52 Intronic
176 PE cases, 20 eclampsia and 90 controls; Australian/New Zealand women rs10497025 0.025 Intronic Fitzpatrick et al., 2009
rs13430086 0.010 3′UTR
LF004 0.018 Intronic
LF013 0.018 Intronic
LF020 0.018 Intronic
1139 PE cases and 2269 controls;
Norwegian women
rs1014064 0.0184 0.86 Intronic Roten et al., 2009
rs17742134 0.0214 1.17 Intronic
rs1424941 0.0171 1.18 Intronic
rs2161983 0.0196 0.86 Intronic
rs3768687 0.0214 0.86 Intronic
rs3764955 0.0327 0.87 Intronic
121 PE cases and 71 controls;
Australian/New Zealand women
rs1424954 0.007 Promoter region Moses et al., 2006
rs1364658 0.04 Intronic
rs1895694 0.05 Intronic
140 PE cases and 380 controls;
Northern Chinese women
rs1424954 0.013 0.687 Promoter region Yanan et al., 2020
rs1014064 0.016 0.693 Intronic
rs1128919 0.018 0.536 Synonymous
rs3768687 0.019 0.701 Intronic
rs3764955 0.024 1.784 Intronic
rs13430086 0.029 0.729 3′UTR
94 PE cases and 116 controls;
Turkish women
rs1128919 0.02 0.44 Synonymous Zeybek et al., 2013
rs13430086 0.02 0.28 3′UTR
rs10497025 0.025 0.010 Intronic

These findings underscore the significance of ACVR2A gene variants in the initiation of PE. In this study, placental samples were obtained from 40 patients, and the detailed clinical attributes are presented in Supplementary file 1. No significant differences in age and pre-pregnancy BMI were observed between the PE group and the normal control (NC) group (p > 0.05). However, the average birth weight of infants delivered by mothers in the PE group was markedly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05).

Analysis of transcriptome data from a public database (GSE114691) confirmed a marked reduction in ACVR2A expression in the PE group, consistent with its potential involvement in impaired placental function (Figure 1A). Figure 1B shows a heatmap of differentially expressed genes, with a focus on those enriched in the WNT signaling pathway. These genes were identified based on significant differential expression and pathway enrichment analyses using KEGG and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA).

Figure 1. ACVR2A was downregulated in placental tissue associated with pre-eclampsia (PE).

(A) Comparison of the RNA-seq volcano maps of all genes in the placenta of normal control (NC) and patients with PE evidently showed that the expression of the ACVR2A gene significantly decreased in patients with PE. (B) Heatmap of differentially expressed genes in PE versus control placental samples. Genes were selected based on significant differential expression (false discovery rate [FDR] <0.05, |log2(fold change)| ≥1) and their involvement in the WNT signaling pathway, as determined through KEGG and GSEA analyses. ACVR2A is highlighted alongside other genes of interest to illustrate its association with the molecular landscape of PE. (C) Western blot analysis demonstrated reduced levels of ACVR2A in PE placental tissue (n = 20) compared with control placentas. (D) RT-qPCR was employed to assess the ACVR2A mRNA expression in placental tissues of NC (n = 10) and patients with PE (n = 10). (E) Immunohistochemical staining was conducted using rabbit IgG anti-human ACVR2A antibody on sections from NC and PE placentas. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The ACVR2A levels were markedly lower in patients with PE (n = 10) than in NC. (F) Immunofluorescence co-localization of rabbit IgG anti-human ACVR2A antibodies and HLA-G antibodies (a marker of extrachorionic trophoblastic cells) was performed in NC and PE maternal placenta. The expression pattern of the ACVR2A antibody closely resembles that of the HLA-G antibody, primarily expressed in extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cells (****p < 0.0001 compared with NC group).

Figure 1—source data 1. Original western blot shown in Figure 1C (labelled).
Figure 1—source data 2. Original western blot shown in Figure 1C.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Downregulation of ACVR2A expression in pre-eclampsia placental tissue: insights from western blot and immunohistochemistry.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Western blot analysis demonstrated reduced levels of ACVR2A in pre-eclampsia placental tissue (n = 20) compared to control placentas. (B) Immunohistochemical staining using rabbit IgG anti-human ACVR2A antibody on sections from normal control pregnant women and pre-eclampsia placentas. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. ACVR2A levels were markedly lower in patients with pre-eclampsia (n = 10) compared to normal control subjects (****p < 0.0001 compared with NC group).
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original gel image of ACVR2A shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1A (labelled).
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original gel image of ACVR2A shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1A.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Reduced ACVR2A expression in trophoblast cells of pre-eclampsia placental tissue revealed by immunofluorescence co-localization with HLA-G.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

Immunofluorescence co-localization of rabbit IgG anti-human ACVR2A antibodies and HLA-G antibodies (a marker of extrachorionic trophoblastic cells) in normal control and pre-eclampsia maternal placenta. The expression pattern of the ACVR2A antibody closely resembles that of the HLA-G antibody, primarily expressed in extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cells.

Western blot and RT-PCR analyses validated these findings, showing significantly reduced ACVR2A protein and mRNA levels in PE placental samples compared to controls (p < 0.001, Figure 1C, D, Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining revealed lower signal intensity of ACVR2A in PE placentas compared to NC placentas, with positive staining observed in both extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs) and syncytiotrophoblasts. In Figure 1E, EVTs are indicated with arrows in the higher magnification image to improve clarity, and additional examples are provided in Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Experimental evidence has indicated predominant expression of HLA-G in trophoblast cells of EVTs, a critical site at the maternal–fetal interface, where trophoblast cells closely interact with the maternal uterine wall (Ferreira et al., 2017). Consequently, immunofluorescence focused on the placental maternal surface, with concurrent staining for ACVR2A and HLA-G. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed a diminished signal of ACVR2A in PE placentas compared to NC placentas, with predominant expression observed in trophoblast cells (Figure 1F, Figure 1—figure supplement 2). To provide additional context, lower magnification images showing the location of the anchoring villi are included in Figure 1—figure supplement 2, while Figure 1F highlights ACVR2A staining in EVTs at higher magnification to better visualize its expression patterns. ACVR2A was primarily localized to the cell surface, consistent with its role as a membrane receptor.

Precision genome surgery: ACVR2A knockout via CRISPR/Cas9

Preliminary experiments confirmed the expression of ACVR2A in trophoblast cells. The expression of ACVR2A in trophoblast cells was verified through RT-qPCR conducted in our laboratory, as shown in Figure 2A. Data from NCBI and the Human Protein Atlas were used to support our findings and provide broader context regarding ACVR2A expression patterns across different cell types. The mRNA levels were analyzed using RT-PCR in various cell types, including HTR8/SVneo, JAR, HCoEpiC (human normal colon epithelial cells), 293 human embryonic kidney cells, MEG-01 (human megakaroblastic leukemia cells), Huh-7 (human liver cancer cells), NCI-H358 (human non-small cell lung cancer cells), HaCaT (human immortal epidermal cells), induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, A427 (human lung cancer cells), and A549 (human non-small cell lung cancer cells), to understand the expression of ACVR2A in different cell lines. In Figure 2A, the mRNA levels of 293 and iPS cells were lower than those of the other cell lines, whereas the mRNA expression levels of HTR8/SVneo and JAR cells resembled those of other cancer cells. Notably, the mRNA expression of JAR cells was significantly higher than that of the other cancer cell lines.

Figure 2. The ACVR2A gene in JAR and HTR8/SVneo cells was successfully knocked out using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology.

(A) RT-qPCR was employed to assess the ACVR2A mRNA expression across various cell lines. The expression of ACVR2A in HTR8/SVneo and JAR was comparable to that in multiple cancer cell lines, with JAR exhibiting a higher ACVR2A expression. (B) DNA sequence of ACVR2A and target sequence site information of sgRNA-1 and sgRNA-2. (C) The knockout efficiency of the ACVR2A gene in HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell lines was assessed through polymeric primer PCR, confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis, and reconfirmed through four rounds of monoclonal cell communities. The specific experimental results are shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1. (D) The ACVR2A mRNA levels were measured in HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell lines, and the normal control group was compared with the two ACVR2A-KO cell lines after three rounds of validation . (E) Western blot analysis showing ACVR2A protein levels in wild-type (WT) and knockout (KO) HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell lines. The ACVR2A protein is significantly absent in KO cell lines compared to WT, confirming successful knockout of the ACVR2A gene. (F) Sanger sequencing confirmed the expression of ACVR2A in ACVR2A-KO monoclonal cell lines and successfully knocked out the DNA fragment between the ACVR2A gene sgRNA-1 and sgRNA-2. The specific experimental results are shown in Figure 2—figure supplements 2 and 3.

Figure 2—source data 1. Original western blot shown in Figure 2E (labelled).
Figure 2—source data 2. Original western blot shown in Figure 2E.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Genotype identification led to the selection of three pairs of HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell lines with complete ACVR2A knockout.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Identification of the first batch of ACVR2A gene knockout monoclonal cell lines in the HTR8/SVneo cell line. (B) Identification of the first batch of ACVR2A gene knockout monoclonal cell lines in the JAR cell line. (C) Identification of the second batch of ACVR2A gene knockout monoclonal cell lines in the HTR8/SVneo cell line. (D) Identification of the second batch of ACVR2A gene knockout monoclonal cell lines in the JAR cell line. (E) Identification of the third batch of ACVR2A gene knockout monoclonal cell lines in the HTR8/SVneo cell line. (F) Identification of the third batch of ACVR2A gene knockout monoclonal cell lines in the JAR cell line. (G) Identification of the fourth batch of ACVR2A gene knockout monoclonal cell lines in the HTR8/SVneo cell line. (H) Identification of the fourth batch of ACVR2A gene knockout monoclonal cell lines in the JAR cell line.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original agarose gel electrophoresis gel patterns shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1 (labelled).
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original agarose gel electrophoresis gel patterns shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. The complete knockout of the ACVR2A gene in HTR8/Svneo monoclonal cell lines was confirmed through Sanger sequencing electrophoresis.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

The Sanger sequencing technique was employed to validate the successful knockout (KO) of the ACVR2A gene in these specific trophoblast cell lines. Each lane corresponds to a distinct monoclonal cell line: HTR8/SVneo wild type (A), HTR8/SVneo KO-1 (B), HTR8/SVneo KO-2 (C), and HTR8/SVneo KO-3 (D). The electropherograms provide a visual representation of the DNA fragments, confirming the precise and targeted deletion of the ACVR2A gene in the knockout cell lines. The distinct peaks and patterns in the electropherograms indicate the specific alterations made during the gene editing process. These sequencing results validate the efficacy of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated ACVR2A gene knockout in the HTR8/Svneo trophoblast cell lines.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. The complete knockout of the ACVR2A gene in JAR monoclonal cell lines was confirmed through Sanger sequencing electrophoresis.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

Each lane corresponds to a specific monoclonal cell line: JAR wild type (A), JAR KO-1 (B), JAR KO-2 (C), and JAR KO-3 (D). The electropherograms capture the unique DNA fragment patterns generated during the gene editing process, confirming the successful deletion of the ACVR2A gene in the knockout cell lines. The distinctive peaks and sequences in the electropherograms offer a visual validation of the precision and accuracy of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technique in inducing targeted genetic changes. These sequencing results serve as a crucial verification step, establishing the reliability of the JAR-ACVR2A-KO monoclonal cell lines for subsequent investigations into the functional implications of ACVR2A in trophoblast cells and its potential relevance to conditions such as pre-eclampsia.

We hypothesized a potential association between ACVR2A expression and trophoblast cell behavior. To test this, we compared ACVR2A mRNA expression levels across various cell lines, including trophoblast-derived (HTR8/SVneo, JAR) and non-trophoblast cell lines (e.g., A549, Huh7). As shown in Figure 2A, ACVR2A expression was significantly higher in trophoblast-derived cell lines, particularly in JAR cells, highlighting its potential role in trophoblast-specific functions such as invasion and migration. In addition, ACVR2A expression in placental tissues from PE patients and normotensive controls showed a marked reduction in PE placentas. Together, these findings underscore the importance of ACVR2A in trophoblast behavior and its potential contribution to PE pathogenesis.

This study focused on the HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell lines, both derived from human EVT cell lines during early pregnancy. Originating from chorionic villi in early pregnancy, the HTR-8/SVneo cell line serves as a prevalent in vitro model for cultured human cells. Researchers frequently opt for the HTR8/SVneo cell line as an alternative model to investigate placental function and study pregnancy-related diseases.

JAR cell lines derived from placental tissue exhibited heightened sensitivity to morphological and biological changes induced by trophoblastic-specific factors (Zeng et al., 2018). Given their choriocarcinoma properties, JAR cells offer a valuable model for simulating and studying trophoblast invasion during pregnancy (Alvarez-Cienfuegos et al., 2020). Thus, JAR and HTR8/SVneo cell lines constituted the cell models employed in the present study.

We employed CRISPR/Cas9 technology to delete the ACVR2A gene in HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell lines. The successful knockout was confirmed through Sanger sequencing, DNA agarose gel electrophoresis, and RT-PCR. This allowed us to investigate the effect of ACVR2A deletion on trophoblast cell behavior (Jinek et al., 2012). By employing the CRISPR/Cas9 conditional knockout system, two single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed to induce the knockout of the ACVR2A gene in two cell lines through electroporation (Figure 2B). The genotypic fragment resulting from the double sgRNA knockout was 775 bp, and the genotypic fragment of the wild type (WT) measured 1750 bp (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). To establish ACVR2A double-knockout cell lines, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was performed, followed by monoclonal culture and rigorous screening. Genotyping through PCR amplification and sequencing confirmed the successful incorporation of indels at the ACVR2A target loci, identifying specific monoclonal clones with double-allele mutations. RT-qPCR and western blotting further validated the absence of ACVR2A expression at both transcript and protein levels in these clones, confirming the successful establishment of ACVR2A double-knockout monoclonal cell lines for downstream functional studies (Figure 2C–E, p < 0.001). Subsequent Sanger sequencing confirmed this outcome, revealing the successful knockout of the gene segment between the two sgRNAs (Figure 2F, Figure 2—figure supplements 2 and 3). These experiments helped further investigate the complex process of ACVR2A’s involvement in trophoblast function and reveal its potential regulatory role in trophoblast proliferation and invasion. The use of advanced gene manipulation techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9, ensured the accuracy and validity of the experimental approach, ensuring the successful deletion of ACVR2A in the target cell line. This provides a foundation for further study of the downstream effects and molecular mechanisms of ACVR2A on trophoblastic function.

ACVR2A knockout diminishes in vitro cell migration and invasion

Cells at the periphery of the scratch could progressively migrate into the void, facilitating the healing of the scratch. The knockout of ACVR2A markedly impeded the migration of HTR8/SVneo and JAR cells in comparison to NCs (p < 0.001, Figure 3A). As illustrated in Figure 3B, the ACVR2A gene knockout markedly suppressed the proliferation rate of HTR8/SVneo cells and JAR cells in comparison to NC (p < 0.001, Figure 3B). Transwell invasion assays further demonstrated reduced invasive capabilities (p < 0.001, Figure 3C). Colony formation assays revealed a significant decrease in clonogenicity in ACVR2A knockout cells (p < 0.001, Figure 3D). The experiments established that ACVR2A plays a crucial role in regulating fundamental cell functions, and its knockout markedly hinders cell migration, proliferation, invasion, and clonal formation. The results hold important implications for comprehending the role of ACVR2A in cellular biology and the development of diseases.

Figure 3. Effects of ACVR2A knockout on trophoblast cell function.

Figure 3.

(A) Cell scratch assay was conducted in a 6-well plate to assess alterations in the migration ability of HTR8/SVneo and JAR cells following ACVR2A gene knockout. Three visual fields were randomly selected under a 100×microscope for continuous observation, calculation, and difference analysis. Scale bar: 100 µm. (B) CCK-8 method was employed to assess the proliferation of HTR8/SVneo and JAR cells after ACVR2A gene knockout. (C) Cell invasion was quantified by counting cells in five randomly selected fields of view at ×300 magnification. Images shown in the figure were captured at lower magnification (×100) to provide an overview of the experimental and control groups. Scale bar: 200 µm. (D) Colony formation was detected by single-cell clone assay. Colony formation assay conducted in a 6-well plate to assess changes in the individual cell proliferation capacity of HTR8/SVneo and JAR cells following ACVR2A gene knockout. Colony formation assays were repeated independently at least 10 times to ensure reproducibility. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD of these replicate experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001 compared with normal control group).

RNA-seq unveils ACVR2A-mediated regulation of trophoblast cell migration and invasion via Wnt pathway

Transcriptome sequencing, also known as RNA-seq, is the latest sequencing technology for comprehensive and rapid transcriptome analysis, providing gene sequence and transcriptomic data for specific cells or tissues of a given species. ACVR2A has been shown to regulate the expression of numerous genes in its proximity. Comprehensive RNA sequencing was performed on both ACVR2A knockout (ACVR2A-KO) and WT cells to uncover the intricate mechanisms through which ACVR2A regulates HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell function. In the JAR knockout group, the deletion of ACVR2A led to the upregulation of 144 genes and the downregulation of 240 genes. By contrast, in the HTR8/SVneo cells, 99 genes were upregulated, and 73 genes were downregulated (Figures 4A and 5A). GSEA is a computational approach that facilitates the evaluation of the enrichment of predefined gene sets within a sequenced gene list. GSEA serves as a powerful tool that aids researchers in gaining profound insights into genomic data and elucidating crucial genes and pathways involved in biological processes.

Figure 4. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that ACVR2A may suppress cell biological behavior through the Wnt/TCF7 pathway in JAR cell lines.

Figure 4.

(A) The volcano plots of RNA-seq for all the genes compared JAR-ACVR2A-KO and WT. (B) One representative hallmark pathway, the Wnt pathway, in the ACVR2A-KO group. (C) The enriched biological process pathways of cell invasion and migration based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (p-value cutoff = 0.05). (D) The category netplot depicted the linkages of downregulated genes and three biological concepts that are related to ACVR2A as a network. (E) The heatmap showed DEGs in the Wnt pathway between experimental and normal control groups. Red and blue represent significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively.

Figure 5. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that ACVR2A may suppress cell biological behavior through the Wnt/TCF7 pathway in HTR8/SVneo cell lines.

Figure 5.

(A) Volcano plots of RNA-seq for all the genes compared HTR8/SVneo-ACVR2A-KO and WT. (B) One representative hallmark pathway, the Wnt pathway, in the ACVR2A-KO group. (C) The enriched biological process pathways in cell invasion and migration based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (p-value cutoff = 0.05). (D) The category netplot depicted the linkages of downregulated genes and three biological concepts that are related to ACVR2A as a network. (E) Heatmap of DEGs about Wnt pathway between experimental and normal control groups. Red and blue represent significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively.

GSEA was employed to elucidate the effect of ACVR2A gene knockout on critical genes and biological pathways in cellular systems, and the canonical pathways from the Cancer Genome Project (CGP) database were investigated. The results suggested modifications in several biological pathways. Information from the KEGG website was integrated with the analysis data of this study, uncovering substantial variations in the Wnt signaling pathway. In JAR cells, the NES value was −1.67, with a p-value of 1.03E−04, whereas in HTR8/SVneo cells, the NES value was −1.45, with a p-value of 0.6E−02 (Figures 4B and 5B). Dotplot and centplot visualizations were created, highlighting the connections among at least 10 pathways associated with cell migration and invasion (Figures 4C and 5C). These plots provide insights into the critical genes and biological pathways that ACVR2A may regulate in cellular processes. Detailed gene analysis of specific, related biological pathways is presented in Figures 4D and 5D. Additionally, Figures 4E and 5E visually represent the differentially expressed genes within the Wnt signaling pathway.

ACVR2A regulates the migration and invasion of trophoblast cells through TCF7/c-JUN pathway

Previous experiments have confirmed the pivotal role of ACVR2A in regulating the fundamental functions of trophoblast cells. Knocking out ACVR2A significantly hindered the migration, proliferation, invasion, and clonal formation of trophoblast cells. The results of RNA-seq analysis showed that ACVR2A knockout resulted in aberrations in multiple signaling pathways, including cell migration, TGF-β, and Wnt. By integrating information from the KEGG website with the analytical data in this study, ACVR2A was identified to potentially regulate the fundamental biological functions of trophoblastic cells through the TCF7/c-JUN signaling pathway. Relevant genes enriched in the TCF7/c-JUN pathway, such as Wnt3, Wnt4, c-JUN, CCND1, TCF7, and TCF7L1, were selected for detailed investigation to further validate the effect of ACVR2A on specific gene expression. The RT-PCR results demonstrated that the mRNA expression levels at tissue and cell levels significantly decreased following ACVR2A knockout compared with the NC group (p < 0.001, Figure 6A–C). Additionally, IHC analysis was employed to assess the protein expression levels of TCF7, TCF7L1, and c-JUN in clinical placental samples from PE patients and NCs. As depicted in Figure 6D–I, the expression levels of these proteins were significantly reduced in the placental tissues from PE patients compared to NCs. Western blot analysis further validated the findings obtained from IHC analysis. As shown in Figure 7A, the expression levels of ACVR2A, SMAD4, SMAD1/5, and their phosphorylated forms (pSMAD1/5/9) were significantly lower in PE placentas compared to normotensive controls (P<0.05). Similarly, downstream targets of the TCF7/c-JUN pathway, including TCF7L1 and TCF7L2, also exhibited reduced protein expression in PE tissues. These results align with the transcriptomic data and suggest a functional impairment of the ACVR2A-TCF7/c-JUN axis in PE.

Figure 6. RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry validated that ACVR2A modulates cellular behavior via the TCF7/c-JUN pathway.

Figure 6.

(A) RT-qPCR analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Wnt3, Wnt4, TCF7, TCF7L1, CCND1, and c-JUN) expression enriched in Wnt/TCF pathway following HTR8/SVneo ACVR2A knockout. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of DEGs (Wnt3, Wnt4, TCF7, TCF7L1, CCND1, and c-JUN) expression enriched in Wnt/TCF pathway following JAR ACVR2A knockout. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of DEGs (Wnt3, Wnt4, TCF7, TCF7L1, CCND1, and c-JUN) expression enriched in Wnt/TCF pathway expression in the placenta of normal control pregnant women (NC) and patients with pre-eclampsia (PE). (D-I) Immunohistochemical staining of normal control pregnant women and PE placentas using rabbit IgG anti-human Wnt3, Wnt4, TCF7L1, TCF7L2, CCND1, and c-JUN antibody. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, and positive cells were quantified using ImageJ software (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001;****p < 0.0001).

Figure 7. Reduced ACVR2A expression impairs SMAD and TCF7/c-JUN signaling in pre-eclampsia, leading to abnormal trophoblast function.

Figure 7.

(A) Western blot analysis showing reduced expression of ACVR2A, SMAD4, SMAD1/5, pSMAD1/5/9, TCF7L1, and TCF7L2 in PE placental tissues compared to normotensive controls. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Densitometric analysis quantifying protein expression levels is shown in the accompanying bar graphs. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 10 for each group). Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed Student’s t-test (****p < 0.0001). (B) Schematic illustration of the proposed mechanisms by which ACVR2A regulates trophoblast cell function in normal and pre-eclampsia conditions. (Colors: green indicates normal conditions and functional pathways, while red highlights abnormalities or disrupted pathways in pre-eclampsia. Arrows: solid dark brown arrows: normal signaling pathways and interactions. Bold red arrows: disrupted or abnormal signaling pathways in pre-eclampsia.) In normal placentas, ACVR2A activates the SMAD1/5-SMAD4 axis, promoting trophoblast invasion, migration, and spiral artery remodeling via the TCF7/c-JUN pathway. In pre-eclampsia, reduced ACVR2A expression impairs SMAD signaling, leading to downregulation of TCF7 and its downstream targets (e.g., CCND1 and JUN), contributing to poor placentation. (draw by FigDraw).

Figure 7—source data 1. Original data related to Figure 7A western blot (labelled).
Figure 7—source data 2. Original data related to Figure 7A western blot.
Figure 7—source data 3. Original data related to Figure 7A western blot.

These findings support the hypothesis that reduced ACVR2A expression is associated with altered TCF7/c-JUN pathway activity in PE placental tissues. These findings further illuminate the intricate mechanisms by which ACVR2A regulates the biological functions of trophoblast cells. In conclusion, the diminished expression of ACVR2A significantly influences the proliferation, invasion, and migration of trophoblastic cells in women with PE.

Discussion

PE is a severe pregnancy complication that significantly risks mothers and fetuses, driven by complex genetic and environmental interactions, and is closely linked to placental abnormalities such as defects in implantation, trophoblast dysfunction, and abnormal vascular development (Chappell et al., 2021; Steegers et al., 2010). Advanced maternal age is a notable risk factor, particularly with the trend of delayed childbearing (Miller et al., 2022; Bartsch et al., 2016; Smithson et al., 2022). Understanding PE mechanisms and developing suitable models are crucial but challenging due to the unique nature of human placental dysfunction (Carter, 2011). Trophoblast cells are vital during pregnancy, supporting embryo attachment, decidualization, vascular remodeling, hormone production, and nutrient transport. Their dysfunction is closely linked to PE, making them a key focus in PE research (Knöfler et al., 2019). Most studies, including ours, use trophoblast cells in in vitro and in vivo models such as cell lines, placental explants, and animal models to investigate PE mechanisms and pathogenesis.

In recent years, GWASs have achieved significant progress in elucidating the genetic basis of PE. Several risk loci associated with PE, including ACVR2A, MTHFR, and FGF, have been identified (Tyrmi et al., 2023; Salonen Ros et al., 2000; Cnattingius et al., 2004). In-depth exploration of these genes enhances understanding of individual variations in PE, aiding early prediction, intervention, and treatment. A comprehensive analysis of multiple PE SNP datasets has emphasized the importance of ACVR2A gene variants in the onset of PE, especially in early-onset cases (Ferreira et al., 2015; Yanan et al., 2020; Roten et al., 2009; Fitzpatrick et al., 2009; Amosco et al., 2019; Moses et al., 2006; Zeybek et al., 2013; Glotov et al., 2019). While this study did not directly assess the impact of ACVR2A SNPs on gene expression, prior research has suggested that SNPs in regulatory regions (e.g., promoters, enhancers, or untranslated regions) can affect transcription factor binding, RNA stability, or splicing efficiency, ultimately altering transcript levels (Albert and Kruglyak, 2015). Such mechanisms could explain the observed downregulation of ACVR2A in PE placental samples, as shown in this study. ACVR2A regulates reproductive functions such as decidualization, trophoblastic invasion, and placenta formation, with studies showing abnormal expression in the decidua of PE patients (Manohar-Sindhu et al., 2023; Funghi et al., 2018; Yong et al., 2018b; Pinyol et al., 2021; Monsivais et al., 2021). Studies have found that ACVR2A is abnormally expressed in the decidua of PE patients, further supporting its crucial role (Yong et al., 2018b). The predominant expression of this receptor in endometrial, placental, and vascular endothelial cells underscores its central role in pregnancy-related mechanisms (Lokki et al., 2011). Therefore, the present study focused on understanding whether ACVR2A influences the biological behavior of trophoblastic cells during early placental development and how this influence contributes to the development of PE.

To validate the expression of ACVR2A in PE, we initially examined public transcriptomic databases, which revealed significantly lower ACVR2A expression in placental samples from PE patients, consistent with GWAS findings across diverse populations. This was further confirmed by analyzing placental samples from PE patients and normotensive pregnant women. After meticulously minimizing blood cell contamination, we performed western blot, RT-PCR, and immunohistochemistry, all of which consistently demonstrated reduced ACVR2A expression in PE placentas. While age and pre-pregnancy BMI were matched between the PE and control groups, we specifically included only PE patients without comorbidities, such as gestational diabetes or chronic hypertension, to minimize confounding factors. This strict criterion ensures that the observed differences in ACVR2A expression are specifically associated with PE. Future studies with larger cohorts and diverse clinical characteristics are needed to confirm these findings and investigate ACVR2A expression across PE subtypes.

Interestingly, our findings also highlight that ACVR2A is predominantly localized to the cell surface of trophoblast cells, consistent with its established role as a membrane receptor mediating activin signaling (Attisano and Wrana, 2002). However, we observed some intracellular staining, which may reflect receptor trafficking, recycling, or internalization processes during ligand binding. Previous studies have reported that activin receptors, including ACVR2A, can undergo internalization during ligand binding as part of their signaling mechanisms or under specific physiological or pathological conditions (e.g., BMP or Activin A interactions) (Olsen et al., 2015). Further investigation into the receptor’s trafficking dynamics may help elucidate its functional implications in trophoblast biology.

Studies suggested that despite being distinct cell types, tumor and trophoblast cells exhibit similarities in specific biological behaviors, encompassing cell proliferation and growth, cell migration and invasion, abnormal cell signaling pathways, angiogenesis, and immune system evasion (Lokki et al., 2011; Afzal et al., 2019; Perez-Garcia et al., 2021; Costanzo et al., 2018). Dong et al. discovered that circular RNA ACVR2A is implicated in the invasion and migration of bladder cancer cells (Dong et al., 2019). Additional studies indicated that the activin A/ACVR2A axis promotes metastasis in colon cancer by selectively activating SMAD2 (Zhang et al., 2023; Zhuo et al., 2018). ACVR2A and ALK3 regulate endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation in mice, with knockout mice showing significant reproductive defects (Monsivais et al., 2021). Ferreira et al. identified a significant association between ACVR2A and early-onset PE (Ferreira et al., 2015). These findings underscore the critical role of ACVR2A in cell growth and development, prompting exploration of its contribution to PE through modulation of abnormal trophoblast invasion. The assessment of ACVR2A mRNA expression levels across multiple cell lines revealed that HTR8/SVneo and JAR cells exhibited comparable levels to tumor cells such as A549, suggesting a potential role for ACVR2A in trophoblast cell functions. It is important to note, however, that JAR cells are derived from choriocarcinoma and HTR8/SVneo cells are immortalized, which may affect their behavior and gene expression compared to normal trophoblast cells. While these models are widely used to study trophoblast functions due to their invasive and proliferative properties, their tumorigenic or immortalized origins could influence the observed ACVR2A expression. Future studies using primary trophoblast cells or in vivo models are needed to confirm these findings and further explore ACVR2A’s physiological role in placental development.

CRISPR/Cas9, developed by researchers like George Church and Jennifer Doudna, uses guide RNAs to target-specific genomic regions, allowing for precise gene removal, insertion, silencing, or activation, with advantages like complete gene deletion despite potential off-target effects (Lingor, 2010; Schuster et al., 2019; Manghwar et al., 2019). CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to delete the ACVR2A gene in two trophoblast cell lines to further explore the correlation between PE and ACVR2A. The successful deletion of ACVR2A was confirmed through Sanger sequencing, genotype identification, and RT-PCR. This precise and targeted gene editing allowed validation of the effect of the ACVR2A gene on various trophoblast cell lines. The deletion resulted in suppressed cell growth, impeded migration, and reduced invasion capabilities, highlighting ACVR2A’s crucial role in these processes. These findings suggest that ACVR2A plays a significant role in trophoblast cell functions, which are critical for proper placental development. The observed suppression of cell growth, migration, and invasion upon ACVR2A deletion indicates that this gene is integral to the invasive behavior of trophoblast cells, a process essential for normal placentation and successful pregnancy outcomes.

Our findings indicate that ACVR2A plays a pivotal role in trophoblast cell invasion, migration, and proliferation, likely through the TCF7/c-JUN pathway. However, ACVR2A is also a key activator of BMP signaling, particularly through the Smad1/5 axis. A recent study by Monsivais et al. demonstrated that ACVR2A-mediated Smad1/5 signaling is essential for endometrial receptivity and implantation, underscoring the importance of this pathway in reproductive biology (Monsivais et al., 2021). Consistent with this, our results revealed significant downregulation of Smad1/5 in PE placentas, suggesting that disruptions in this axis may contribute to the impaired trophoblast function observed in PE. While Smad2/3/4 were not directly assessed in this study, previous research has shown that Smad2/3 can interact with TCF/LEF transcription factors to regulate Wnt-related target genes (DiRenzo et al., 2016; Szilágyi et al., 2022). This highlights potential cross-talk between TGF-β family signaling and the TCF7/c-JUN axis. In PE, such interactions may be disrupted, further impairing trophoblast invasion and migration. Future studies should aim to investigate the interplay between Smad1/5, Smad2/3/4, and TCF7/c-JUN pathways to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying PE pathogenesis (Zhang et al., 2023; Guo and Wang, 2009).

Our findings also face certain limitations that should be acknowledged. The observed reduction in proliferation in ACVR2A knockout cells may partially influence the invasion and migration assay results. Specifically, fewer proliferating cells could inherently lead to fewer invading or migrating cells, complicating the interpretation of these assays. To mitigate this issue, we conducted the invasion and migration assays under low-serum conditions (1–2% serum), as serum-free conditions negatively affected cell viability in preliminary trials (Pijuan et al., 2019). Despite these efforts, the impact of reduced proliferation remains a limitation. Future studies could use approaches such as normalizing cell numbers or employing proliferation-independent methods to confirm the specific role of ACVR2A in invasion and migration.

Another potential mechanism for ACVR2A in PE involves its role in the endometrium. Studies in mice have shown that uterine-specific knockout of ACVR2A in progesterone receptor-expressing cells results in embryo implantation failure, underscoring its critical role in uterine receptivity and embryo implantation (Monsivais et al., 2021). This suggests that ACVR2A may influence PE not only through its effects on trophoblast function but also via uterine signaling pathways. In this study, we provide novel insights into the role of ACVR2A in trophoblast cell migration and invasion using CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines. While these findings are significant, we acknowledge that the lack of in vivo validation is a limitation. Future studies employing in vivo models, such as trophoblast-specific ACVR2A knockout mice, could provide further evidence of ACVR2A’s regulatory effects and its contribution to placental development and PE pathogenesis. Additionally, larger clinical studies are needed to confirm the clinical relevance of ACVR2A expression in diverse patient populations. Addressing these aspects in future research will be essential to fully elucidate the translational potential of our findings.

Materials and methods

Collection of placenta and decidua specimens/subject recruitment and placental sampling

This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee (SWYX:NO2021-352). Between October 2022 and October 2024, 20 PE patients and 20 normal pregnant women admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University for cesarean section were randomly selected. The exclusion criteria included gestational diabetes, cardiovascular disease, history of thyroid disease, history of autoimmune disease, history of hypertension, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, anemia, infectious disease, drug use, recent acute or chronic infectious disease, and incomplete information recording. The control group consisted of 20 non-hypertensive healthy pregnant women who underwent cesarean section due to breech and cicatricial uterus. In accordance with the guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG Publications, 2020), PE is diagnosed as hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg on at least two occasions) in combination with one or more of the following: proteinuria (≥300 mg/24 hr urine collection or protein/creatinine ratio ≥0.3), thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine, elevated liver enzymes, pulmonary edema, or new-onset headache unresponsive to treatment (ACOG Publications, 2020). In this study, we included 40 participants, comprising 20 PE patients and 20 normal pregnancies. To minimize potential confounding factors, only PE patients without any comorbidities, such as gestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, or other pregnancy-related complications, were included. This strict selection criterion was designed to ensure that the observed differences in ACVR2A expression are specifically associated with PE. All patients in the PE group met these diagnostic criteria, and detailed clinical characteristics are provided in Supplementary file 1.

All specimens were collected during cesarean sections. Within 5 min after placental delivery, tissue samples measuring approximately 1 × 1 × 1 cm were vertically excised at the junction between the center of the placenta and the umbilical cord. Obvious abnormal regions, such as areas with bleeding, infarction, or calcification, were carefully avoided to ensure sample integrity. The tissue was repeatedly rinsed with sterile saline under aseptic conditions to remove residual blood, then cut into small fragments. The fragments were immediately placed into cryogenic tubes, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently transferred to a −8°C freezer within 24 hr to preserve RNA and protein integrity for downstream analyses.

Cell culture

All cell lines used in this study were purchased from established suppliers. HTR8/SVneo cells were obtained from the U.S. Typical Culture Preservation Center, and JAR cells were purchased from Wuhan Punosei Life Technology. Other cell lines, including A549, Huh7, MEG-01, and NCI-H358, were similarly sourced from commercial suppliers. All cell lines were cultured following standard protocols recommended by the suppliers. No other cell contamination was identified by STR. HTR8/SVneo and JAR cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Servicebio, China). Cancer cell lines such as A549 and Huh7 were cultured in DMEM or RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, and routine testing for mycoplasma contamination was performed every 2 weeks to ensure the reliability of experimental results.

CRISPR/Cas9-targeted deletion of ACVR2A

ACVR2A sgRNAs were designed using the online tool provided by the Broad Institute (https://portals.broadinstitute.org/gppx/crispick/public). Two sgRNA sequences were selected based on their high predicted on-target efficiency and low off-target potential (forward: 5ʹ-GAA GGC ACA TCC TGA CTT GT-ʹ; reverse: 5ʹ-GAT GAC ACA ATCTTCTGCAC-3ʹ). Potential off-target sites were further assessed using Cas-OFFinder (http://www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder/). The sgRNAs were synthesized in vitro by transcription and individually combined with a gRNA scaffold to form functional sgRNAs. These sgRNAs were then complexed with Cas9 protein to assemble ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. The RNP complexes were delivered into HTR8/SVneo and JAR cell lines via electroporation using the Celetrix system, following the manufacturer’s protocol. The electroporation was performed with an sgRNA–Cas9 mixture in OPTI-MEM buffer. After electroporation, cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS for 24 hr. Successful incorporation of the RNP complex was confirmed through PCR and sequencing. ACVR2A deletion in single monoclonal cell lines was validated through a multistep process, including Sanger sequencing, agarose gel electrophoresis, and RT-PCR. Primers specifically designed for ACVR2A knockout verification were used during this process (Supplementary file 4). This rigorous validation ensures the reliability of the generated knockout cell lines for downstream functional studies.

RT-qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from cells using a Total RNA Extraction Kit (TIANGEN, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using a cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Japan) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Primers used for quantitative analysis were synthesized by Takara (Japan), and their sequences are listed in Supplementary file 2. The mRNA levels were quantified by SYBR Green (Roche, Germany), and dissolution curve analysis was performed to ensure amplification specificity. The PCR protocol consisted of 40 cycles: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by denaturation at 95°C for 5 s, annealing at 63.3°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 10 s. Dissociation curve analysis was performed post-amplification to confirm the specificity of the PCR products. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were used for relative quantification, and all reactions achieved an amplification efficiency between 95% and 100%. These results ensure both the reliability and reproducibility of the quantification process.

Western blot analysis

Cells were harvested using a cell scraper and resuspended in RIPA buffer supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The cell suspension was incubated on ice for 30 min to ensure complete lysis. After incubation, the lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C to remove cell debris. The supernatant containing protein lysates was collected, and the protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). For tissue samples, placental tissues were homogenized in RIPA buffer containing the same supplements (protease and phosphatase inhibitors). The homogenate was incubated on ice for 30 min and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C to remove debris. The supernatant containing protein lysates was collected, and protein concentration was similarly determined using the BCA protein assay kit. Equal amounts of protein (20–30 µg per sample) were separated by SDS–PAGE (12% resolving gel, 5% stacking gel) and electro-transferred onto a PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore, Germany). The membrane was blocked with 5% BSA in TBST (TBS, pH 7.4, 0.2% Tween-20) at room temperature for 1 hr and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against ACVR2A (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and GAPDH (Santa Cruz, USA) at specified dilutions. On the following day, the membrane was washed three times with TBST and incubated in darkness for 2 hr with Dylight 680-conjugated secondary antibodies (KPL, USA). Images of the membrane were acquired using a Li-Cor Odyssey Clx Infrared Imaging System (LI-Cor Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE, USA). Densitometry analysis of protein bands was performed using ImageJ software, with GAPDH used as the internal control for normalization.

IHC staining and data analysis

IHC staining was conducted on 4 μm paraffin sections, which were dried for 30 min at 60°C, dewaxed using an environmentally friendly solution, and gradually dehydrated through an alcohol gradient. Antigen retrieval was performed at 98°C in EDTA (pH 9.0) for 15 min, and endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% H2O2 at room temperature for 25 min. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies at appropriate concentrations (details in Supplementary file 4), followed by PBS washing and 50 min incubation with HRP-labeled secondary antibodies at room temperature. The immunoperoxidase signal was visualized using a 3,3ʹ-diaminobenzene (DAB) solution, followed by hematoxylin counterstaining.

For quantification, IHC staining was assessed across the entire tissue section to capture global expression patterns, with representative regions from anchoring villous areas selected for detailed comparison between NC and PE groups. Images were captured under identical magnifications and lighting conditions. The DAB signal (brown, protein-specific) and hematoxylin signal (blue, nuclear staining) were separated using ImageJ’s color deconvolution plugin. The DAB signal was quantified as integrated optical density (OD) within the selected regions. To ensure consistency, all samples were processed under identical conditions, including the same antibody dilution, incubation times, and DAB development durations. Negative controls (without primary antibody) were included to monitor background staining, and the DAB reaction was stopped simultaneously for all samples. Quantified signal intensities were normalized to the area of the regions analyzed, and comparisons between NC and PE groups were performed using statistical tests (e.g., t-test).

CCK-8 assay for cell proliferation

The wild-type cells (WT group) and ACVR2A-knockout cells (ACVR2A-KO group) were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 10,000 cells per well in 100 μl of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were incubated overnight at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Cell proliferation was assessed using the CCK-8 assay (CAT: G4103-1ML, Servicebio) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. At 24, 48, and 72 hr after seeding, 10 μl of CCK-8 reagent was added to each well. After incubating the plates at 37°C for 2 hr the OD of the samples was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. The cell growth curve was generated based on the average OD values from three independent biological replicates. Background OD values from wells containing only medium and CCK-8 reagent were subtracted before analysis. Statistical comparisons of proliferation rates between the WT and ACVR2A-KO groups were performed using a Student’s t-test.

Wound healing assay

The ability of ACVR2A to enhance cell migration in JAR and HTR8/SVneo cells was evaluated using wound healing (scratch) assays. The cell lines were seeded into 6-well culture plates and cultured until they reached approximately 90% confluence. A sterile 200 μl pipette tip was used to create a single scratch in the cellular monolayer. Detached cells and debris were removed by rinsing with PBS, 1640 medium supplemented with 1% FBS was added to each well to minimize proliferation during the assay. Images of the cells were captured at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hr using a phase-contrast microscope. The migratory capability of the cells was determined at 24, 48, and 72 hr post-scratch by measuring the width of the wound in three randomly selected fields simultaneously. The migration index was computed using the following formula, with T representing time (24, 48, or 72 hr):

HealingRate(%)=(OHscratchareaTHscratchareaOHscratcharea)×100%

The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance between groups was determined using a Student’s t-test.

Transwell invasion assays

First, the upper chamber of a 12-well Transwell insert with an 8-μm pore size (Corning, USA) was coated with 50 μl of Matrigel (diluted 1:3 in serum-free medium) and allowed to polymerize at 37°C for 30 min. Next, 1.5 × 10⁵ cells from each cell line were suspended in 200 μl of serum-free medium and seeded into the upper chamber. The lower chamber was filled with 800 μl of growth medium containing 10% FBS to serve as a chemoattractant. The Transwell plates were incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 for 24 hr. After incubation, the non-migrating cells on the upper side of the Transwell membrane were carefully removed with a cotton swab. The cells that had migrated to the bottom surface of the membrane were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature for 15 min, then stained with 1% crystal violet for 20 min. Excess dye was removed by washing the inserts with PBS, and the migrated cells were counted under a light microscope in five randomly selected fields per insert. The invading cells were quantified by randomly selecting 5 fields of view per sample under ×300 magnification. Images shown in the figure were captured at lower magnification (×100) to provide a comprehensive visual comparison between experimental and control groups. Each experiment was independently repeated at least 10 times to ensure consistency and reliability of the results.

Plate cloning formation assay

Colony formation assays were conducted using ACVR2A knockout JAR and HTR8/SVneo cell lines. For each group, the cells were seeded at a density of 1000 cells/well in a 6-well plate (NEST) containing 15% FBS supplemented with 1640 medium and cultured for 14 days. The medium was changed every 3 days. When the majority of cell clones expanded to more than 100 cells, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% PFA for 20 min, and stained with 1% crystal violet for 20 min at room temperature. The excess crystal violet was washed away with PBS, and the dishes were air dried. The cell clones were manually counted under a dissecting microscope. The statistical data on colony formation were derived from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± SD.

Transcriptomic analysis

RNA was extracted from four cell lines (ACVR2A KO-JAR, WT-JAR, ACVR2A KO-HTR8/SVneo, and WT-HTR8/SVneo) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. RNA quality, purity, and concentration were assessed with a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher, USA) and the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit (Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100, Agilent, USA). Transcriptomic analysis was conducted by Biomker Technologies (Guangzhou, China). Differential gene expression was analyzed using the DESeq2 R package (version 1.10.1). Benjamini and Hochberg’s method was applied to control the false discovery rate (FDR), with genes meeting the thresholds of FDR <0.05 and |log2(fold change) |≥1 considered significant. Pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes was performed using KOBAS (version 3.0) software.

Public RNA-seq data (GSE114691) from the GEO database, comprising 20 PE and 21 control placental samples, were analyzed to assess ACVR2A expression and identify differentially expressed genes. PE and control groups were defined based on clinical criteria, including hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) and proteinuria (≥300 mg/24 hr urine collection or protein/creatinine ratio ≥0.3). The gestational ages for these samples ranged from 34 to 38 weeks. Differential gene expression analysis was conducted using the DESeq2 R package (version 1.10.1), with thresholds set at FDR <0.05 and |log2(fold change) |≥1. GSEA was performed to identify enriched pathways, with a specific focus on the WNT signaling pathway.

Statistical analysis

All figures were generated using GraphPad Prism (version 10) software. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. For data following a normal distribution, parametric tests such as the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test were used. For comparisons involving two independent variables, two-way ANOVA was applied with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. For non-normally distributed data, non-parametric tests such as the Mann–Whitney U test were utilized. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The suitability of parametric tests was verified by checking the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances. When these assumptions were not met, appropriate non-parametric alternatives were used. Specific statistical tests used for each figure and table are detailed in the respective legends and captions. For example, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied in Supplementary file 2 due to the non-normal distribution of the data. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All experimental conditions were performed in triplicate unless otherwise specified.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund (Guangdong-Shenzhen Joint Fund) (2021B1515120070, 2023A1515010872), the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC2701500, 2019YFA0110804), and Guangzhou fundamental research project jointly funded by School (Institution) (high-level university) (202102010131).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Yi Yang, Email: Yangyi@gzhmu.edu.cn.

Fang He, Email: hefangjnu@126.com.

Mark S Sharpley, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, United States.

Kathryn Song Eng Cheah, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund 2021B1515120070 to Yi Yang.

  • Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund 2023A1515010872 to Yi Yang.

  • National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2701500 to Fang He.

  • Guangzhou Fundamental Research Project jointly funded by School 202102010131 to Fang He.

  • National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFA0110804 to Fang He.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing.

Data curation, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation.

Data curation, Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration.

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Project administration.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee (SWYX:NO2021-352). All participants in this study provided a written informed consent for donating blood. The Ethics Committee of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou, China) approved the experiments using human cells. The animal experiments were approved by The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. All methods were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Clinical characteristics of pre-eclamptic and normal control pregnancies.
elife-101236-supp1.docx (14.8KB, docx)
Supplementary file 2. Sequences of the primers for RT-qPCR.
elife-101236-supp2.docx (14.8KB, docx)
Supplementary file 3. Sequences of the genotyping primers.
elife-101236-supp3.docx (13.8KB, docx)
Supplementary file 4. Details of immunohistochemical antibodies.
elife-101236-supp4.docx (14.8KB, docx)
MDAR checklist

Data availability

Sequencing data is available from the NCBI database, PRJNA1250493.

The following dataset was generated:

He F. 2024. ACVR2A Facilitates Trophoblast Cell Invasion through TCF7/c-JUN Pathway in Pre-eclampsia Progression. NCBI BioProject. PRJNA1250493

The following previously published dataset was used:

Awamleh Z, Gloor GB, Han V. 2019. Placental transcriptome in pregnancies complicated by Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preeclampsia (PE) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE114691

References

  1. ACOG Publications Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020;135:e237–e260. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Afzal J, Maziarz JD, Hamidzadeh A, Liang C, Erkenbrack EM, Kim HN, Haeger JD, Pfarrer C, Hoang T, Ott T, Spencer T, Pavličev M, Antczak DF, Levchenko A, Wagner GP, Kshitiz Evolution of placental invasion and cancer metastasis are causally linked. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2019;3:1743–1753. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1046-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albert FW, Kruglyak L. The role of regulatory variation in complex traits and disease. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2015;16:197–212. doi: 10.1038/nrg3891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez-Cienfuegos A, Cantero-Nieto L, Garcia-Gomez JA, Robledo G, González-Gay MA, Ortego-Centeno N. FGF23-Klotho axis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2020;38:50–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Amosco MD, Tavera GR, Villar VAM, Naniong JMA, David-Bustamante LMG, Williams SM, Jose PA, Palmes-Saloma CP. Non-additive effects of ACVR2A in preeclampsia in a Philippine population. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019;19:11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2152-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Attisano L, Wrana JL. Signal transduction by the TGF-beta superfamily. Science. 2002;296:1646–1647. doi: 10.1126/science.1071809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG, High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i1753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carter AM. Comparative studies of placentation and immunology in non-human primates suggest a scenario for the evolution of deep trophoblast invasion and an explanation for human pregnancy disorders. Reproduction. 2011;141:391–396. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chappell LC, Cluver CA, Kingdom J, Tong S. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2021;398:341–354. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32335-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen X, Li P, Liu M, Zheng H, He Y, Chen M-X, Tang W, Yue X, Huang Y, Zhuang L, Wang Z, Zhong M, Ke G, Hu H, Feng Y, Chen Y, Yu Y, Zhou H, Huang L. Gut dysbiosis induces the development of pre-eclampsia through bacterial translocation. Gut. 2020;69:513–522. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cnattingius S, Reilly M, Pawitan Y, Lichtenstein P. Maternal and fetal genetic factors account for most of familial aggregation of preeclampsia: a population-based Swedish cohort study. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. 2004;130A:365–371. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Costanzo V, Bardelli A, Siena S, Abrignani S. Exploring the links between cancer and placenta development. Open Biology. 2018;8:180081. doi: 10.1098/rsob.180081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Daussin FN, Zoll J, Dufour SP, Ponsot E, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Doutreleau S, Mettauer B, Piquard F, Geny B, Richard R. Effect of interval versus continuous training on cardiorespiratory and mitochondrial functions: relationship to aerobic performance improvements in sedentary subjects. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2008;295:R264–R72. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00875.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dean M, Davis DA, Burdette JE. Activin A stimulates migration of the fallopian tube epithelium, an origin of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, through non-canonical signaling. Cancer Letters. 2017;391:114–124. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dimitriadis E, Rolnik DL, Zhou W. Pre-eclampsia. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2023;9:4256. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00425-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DiRenzo DM, Chaudhary MA, Shi X, Franco SR, Zent J, Wang K, Guo L-W, Kent KC. A crosstalk between TGF-β/Smad3 and Wnt/β-catenin pathways promotes vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Cellular Signalling. 2016;28:498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dong W, Bi J, Liu H, Yan D, He Q, Zhou Q, Wang Q, Xie R, Su Y, Yang M, Lin T, Huang J. Circular RNA ACVR2A suppresses bladder cancer cells proliferation and metastasis through miR-626/EYA4 axis. Molecular Cancer. 2019;18:95. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1025-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ferreira LC, Gomes CEM, Araújo ACP, Bezerra PF, Duggal P, Jeronimo SMB. Association between ACVR2A and early-onset preeclampsia: replication study in a Northeastern Brazilian population. Placenta. 2015;36:186–190. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferreira LMR, Meissner TB, Tilburgs T, Strominger JL. HLA-G: at the interface of maternal-fetal tolerance. Trends in Immunology. 2017;38:272–286. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fitzpatrick E, Johnson MP, Dyer TD, Forrest S, Elliott K, Blangero J, Brennecke SP, Moses EK. Genetic association of the activin A receptor gene (ACVR2A) and pre-eclampsia. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2009;15:195–204. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Funghi L, Torricelli M, Novembri R, Vannuccini S, Cevenini G, Di Tommaso M, Severi FM, Petraglia F. Placental and maternal serum activin A in spontaneous and induced labor in late-term pregnancy. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2018;41:171–177. doi: 10.1007/s40618-017-0640-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gebara N, Correia Y, Wang K, Bussolati B. Angiogenic properties of placenta-derived extracellular vesicles in normal pregnancy and in preeclampsia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22:22105402. doi: 10.3390/ijms22105402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Glotov AS, Kazakov SV, Vashukova ES, Pakin VS, Danilova MM, Nasykhova YA, Masharsky AE, Mozgovaya EV, Eremeeva DR, Zainullina MS, Baranov VS. Targeted sequencing analysis of ACVR2A gene identifies novel risk variants associated with preeclampsia. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2019;32:2790–2796. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1449204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Guo X, Wang XF. Signaling cross-talk between TGF-beta/BMP and other pathways. Cell Research. 2009;19:71–88. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hua H. From GWAS to single-cell MPRA. Nature Methods. 2023;20:349. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01827-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Knöfler M, Haider S, Saleh L, Pollheimer J, Gamage TKJB, James J. Human placenta and trophoblast development: key molecular mechanisms and model systems. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2019;76:3479–3496. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03104-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li P, Wang H, Guo L, Gou X, Chen G, Lin D, Fan D, Guo X, Liu Z. Association between gut microbiota and preeclampsia-eclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. BMC Medicine. 2022;20:443. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02657-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lingor P. In: Apoptosome. Lingor P, editor. Springer; 2010. Regulation of cell death and survival by RNA interference – the roles of mirna and sirna; pp. 95–117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lokki AI, Klemetti MM, Heino S, Hiltunen L, Heinonen S, Laivuori H. Association of the rs1424954 polymorphism of the ACVR2A gene with the risk of pre-eclampsia is not replicated in a Finnish study population. BMC Research Notes. 2011;4:545. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Manghwar H, Lindsey K, Zhang X, Jin S. CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing. Trends in Plant Science. 2019;24:1102–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Manohar-Sindhu S, Merfeld-Clauss S, Goddard Y, March KL, Traktuev DO. Diminished vasculogenesis under inflammatory conditions is mediated by Activin A. Angiogenesis. 2023;26:423–436. doi: 10.1007/s10456-023-09873-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Miller EC, Wilczek A, Bello NA, Tom S, Wapner R, Suh Y. Pregnancy, preeclampsia and maternal aging: From epidemiology to functional genomics. Ageing Research Reviews. 2022;73:101535. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Monsivais D, Nagashima T, Prunskaite-Hyyryläinen R, Nozawa K, Shimada K, Tang S, Hamor C, Agno JE, Chen F, Masand RP, Young SL, Creighton CJ, DeMayo FJ, Ikawa M, Lee S-J, Matzuk MM. Endometrial receptivity and implantation require uterine BMP signaling through an ACVR2A-SMAD1/SMAD5 axis. Nature Communications. 2021;12:3386. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23571-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moses EK, Fitzpatrick E, Freed KA, Dyer TD, Forrest S, Elliott K, Johnson MP, Blangero J, Brennecke SP. Objective prioritization of positional candidate genes at a quantitative trait locus for pre-eclampsia on 2q22. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2006;12:505–512. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gal056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Olsen OE, Wader KF, Hella H, Mylin AK, Turesson I, Nesthus I, Waage A, Sundan A, Holien T. Activin A inhibits BMP-signaling by binding ACVR2A and ACVR2B. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2015;13:27. doi: 10.1186/s12964-015-0104-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Perez-Garcia V, Lea G, Lopez-Jimenez P, Okkenhaug H, Burton GJ, Moffett A, Turco MY, Hemberger M. BAP1/ASXL complex modulation regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition during trophoblast differentiation and invasion. eLife. 2021;10:e63254. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pijuan J, Barceló C, Moreno DF, Maiques O, Sisó P, Marti RM, Macià A, Panosa A. In vitro cell migration, invasion, and adhesion assays: from cell imaging to data analysis. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2019;7:107. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pinyol R, Torrecilla S, Wang H, Montironi C, Piqué-Gili M, Torres-Martin M, Wei-Qiang L, Willoughby CE, Ramadori P, Andreu-Oller C, Taik P, Lee YA, Moeini A, Peix J, Faure-Dupuy S, Riedl T, Schuehle S, Oliveira CP, Alves VA, Boffetta P, Lachenmayer A, Roessler S, Minguez B, Schirmacher P, Dufour J-F, Thung SN, Reeves HL, Carrilho FJ, Chang C, Uzilov AV, Heikenwalder M, Sanyal A, Friedman SL, Sia D, Llovet JM. Molecular characterisation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Journal of Hepatology. 2021;75:865–878. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Roten LT, Johnson MP, Forsmo S, Fitzpatrick E, Dyer TD, Brennecke SP, Blangero J, Moses EK, Austgulen R. Association between the candidate susceptibility gene ACVR2A on chromosome 2q22 and pre-eclampsia in a large Norwegian population-based study (the HUNT study) European Journal of Human Genetics. 2009;17:250–257. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Salonen Ros H, Lichtenstein P, Lipworth L, Cnattingius S. Genetic effects on the liability of developing pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2000;91:256–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schuster A, Erasimus H, Fritah S, Nazarov PV, van Dyck E, Niclou SP, Golebiewska A. RNAi/CRISPR screens: from a pool to a valid hit. Trends in Biotechnology. 2019;37:38–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Smithson SD, Greene NH, Esakoff TF. Pregnancy outcomes in very advanced maternal age women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. 2022;4:100491. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Steegers EAP, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376:631–644. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Szilágyi SS, Amsalem-Zafran AR, Shapira KE, Ehrlich M, Henis YI. Competition between type I activin and BMP receptors for binding to ACVR2A regulates signaling to distinct Smad pathways. BMC Biology. 2022;20:50. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01252-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tyrmi JS, Kaartokallio T, Lokki AI, Jääskeläinen T, Kortelainen E, Ruotsalainen S, Karjalainen J, Ripatti S, Kivioja A, Laisk T, Kettunen J, Pouta A, Kivinen K, Kajantie E, Heinonen S, Kere J, Laivuori H, FINNPEC Study Group, FinnGen Project, and the Estonian Biobank Research Team Genetic risk factors associated with preeclampsia and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. JAMA Cardiology. 2023;8:674–683. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yanan F, Rui L, Xiaoying L, Shuang Z, Feng Z, Yingnan W, Tianshuang J, Xuan Y, Xiaolei Y, Litao S. Association between ACVR2A gene polymorphisms and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the northern Chinese population. Placenta. 2020;90:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2019.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yong HEJ, Murthi P, Wong MH, Kalionis B, Cartwright JE, Brennecke SP, Keogh RJ. Effects of normal and high circulating concentrations of activin A on vascular endothelial cell functions and vasoactive factor production. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2015;5:346–353. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yong HEJ, Murthi P, Brennecke SP, Moses EK. Genetic approaches in preeclampsia. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2018a;1710:53–72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7498-6_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yong HEJ, Murthi P, Kalionis B, Keogh RJ, Brennecke SP. Decidual ACVR2A regulates extravillous trophoblast functions of adhesion, proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2018b;12:189–193. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zeng H-J, Liu Z, Wang Y-P, Yang D, Yang R, Qu L-B. Studies on the anti-aging activity of a glycoprotein isolated from Fupenzi (Rubus chingii Hu.) and its regulation on klotho gene expression in mice kidney. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018;119:470–476. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zeybek B, Celik HA, Aydin HH, Askar N. Polymorphisms in the activin A receptor type 2A gene affect the onset time and severity of preeclampsia in the Turkish population. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2013;41:389–399. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang H, Ruan Q, Chen C, Yu H, Guan S, Hu D, Yang C, Lin R, Zhuo C. Activin A/ACVR2A axis inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in colon cancer by activating SMAD2. Molecular Carcinogenesis. 2023;62:1585–1598. doi: 10.1002/mc.23601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao H-J, Chang H-M, Zhu H, Klausen C, Li Y, Leung PCK. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 promotes human trophoblast cell invasion by inducing activin A production. Endocrinology. 2018;159:2815–2825. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhuo C, Hu D, Li J, Yu H, Lin X, Chen Y, Zhuang Y, Li Q, Zheng X, Yang C. Downregulation of activin A receptor type 2A is associated with metastatic potential and poor prognosis of colon cancer. Journal of Cancer. 2018;9:3626–3633. doi: 10.7150/jca.26790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Mark S Sharpley 1

The role of ACVR2A is potentially of importance to both the biology of trophoblast cells and to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. In this manuscript, the authors have taken a useful first step towards better understanding this protein using a loss of function model in trophoblast cell lines and then examining invasion, proliferation, and transcription in these cells. The study is solid and further in vivo evidence on how target factors participate in the occurrence of placental structural disorders and diseases through potential downstream pathways will be invaluable in the future.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

This study has preliminarily revealed the role of ACVR2A in trophoblast cell function, including its effects on migration, invasion, proliferation, and clonal formation, as well as its downstream signaling pathways.

Strengths:

The use of multiple experimental techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout, RNA-seq, and functional assays (e.g., Transwell, colony formation, and scratch assays), is commendable and demonstrates the authors' effort to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying ACVR2A's regulation of trophoblast function. The RNA-seq analysis and subsequent GSEA findings offer valuable insights into the pathways affected by ACVR2A knockout, particularly the Wnt and TCF7/c-JUN signaling pathways.

Weaknesses:

The current findings provide valuable insights into the role of ACVR2A in trophoblast cell function and its involvement in the regulation of migration, invasion, and proliferation, further validation in both in vitro and in vivo models would strengthen the conclusions. Additional techniques, such as animal models and more advanced clinical sample analyses, would help strengthen the conclusions and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular pathways involved.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

ACVR2A is one of a handful of genes for which significant correlations between associated SNPs and the incidences of preeclampsia have been found in multiple populations. It is one of the TGFB family receptors, and multiple ligands of ACVR2A, as well as its coreceptors and related inhibitors, have been implicated in placental development, trophoblast invasion, and embryo implantation. This useful study builds on this knowledge by showing that ACVR2A knockout in trophoblast-related cell lines reduces trophoblast invasion, which could tie together many of these observations. The implication of cross-talk between the WNT and ACRV2A/SMAD2 pathways is an important contribution to the understanding of the regulation of trophoblast function.

Strengths:

(1) ACVR2A is one of very few genes implicated in preeclampsia in multiple human populations, yet its role in pathogenesis is not very well studied and this study begins to address that hole in our knowledge.

(2) ACVR2A is also indirectly implicated in trophoblast invasion and trophoblast development via its connections to many ligands, inhibitors, and coreceptors, suggesting its potential importance.

(3) The authors have used multiple cell lines to verify their most important observations.

Editors' note: Following the first round of peer review, the original reviewers were not available to review the revised manuscript. As several specific weakness detailed by the reviewers were largely addressed in the revised manuscript, they are not included here.

eLife. 2025 May 30;14:RP101236. doi: 10.7554/eLife.101236.3.sa3

Author response

Shujing Yang 1, Huanyao Liu 2, Jieshi Hu 3, Binjun Chen 4, Wanlu An 5, Xuwen Song 6, Yi Yang 7, Fang He 8

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews

Public Reviews:

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Summary:

This study has preliminarily revealed the role of ACVR2A in trophoblast cell function, including its effects on migration, invasion, proliferation, and clonal formation, as well as its downstream signaling pathways.

Strengths:

The use of multiple experimental techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout, RNA-seq, and functional assays (e.g., Transwell, colony formation, and scratch assays), is commendable and demonstrates the authors' effort to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying ACVR2A's regulation of trophoblast function. The RNA-seq analysis and subsequent GSEA findings offer valuable insights into the pathways affected by ACVR2A knockout, particularly the Wnt and TCF7/c-JUN signaling pathways.

Weaknesses:

The molecular mechanisms underlying this study require further exploration through additional experiments. While the current findings provide valuable insights into the role of ACVR2A in trophoblast cell function and its involvement in the regulation of migration, invasion, and proliferation, further validation in both in vitro and in vivo models is needed. Additionally, more experiments are required to establish the functional relevance of the TCF7/c-JUN pathway and its clinical significance, particularly in relation to pre-eclampsia. Additional techniques, such as animal models and more advanced clinical sample analyses, would help strengthen the conclusions and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular pathways involved.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Summary:

ACVR2A is one of a handful of genes for which significant correlations between associated SNPs and the incidences of preeclampsia have been found in multiple populations. It is one of the TGFB family receptors, and multiple ligands of ACVR2A, as well as its coreceptors and related inhibitors, have been implicated in placental development, trophoblast invasion, and embryo implantation. This useful study builds on this knowledge by showing that ACVR2A knockout in trophoblast-related cell lines reduces trophoblast invasion, which could tie together many of these observations. Support for this finding is incomplete, as reduced proliferation may be influencing the invasion results. The implication of cross-talk between the WNT and ACRV2A/SMAD2 pathways is an important contribution to the understanding of the regulation of trophoblast function.

Strengths:

(1) ACVR2A is one of very few genes implicated in preeclampsia in multiple human populations, yet its role in pathogenesis is not very well studied and this study begins to address that hole in our knowledge.

(2) ACVR2A is also indirectly implicated in trophoblast invasion and trophoblast development via its connections to many ligands, inhibitors, and coreceptors, suggesting its potential importance.

(3) The authors have used multiple cell lines to verify their most important observations.

Weaknesses:

(1) There are a number of claims made in the introduction without attribution. For example, there are no citations for the claims that family history is a significant risk factor for PE, that inadequate trophoblast invasion of spiral arteries is a key factor, and that immune responses, and reninangiotensin activity are involved.

Thank you for pointing out the lack of citations in some parts of the introduction. We have revised the manuscript to include appropriate references for the claims regarding family history as a risk factor for PE, the role of inadequate trophoblast invasion in spiral arteries, and the involvement of immune responses and the renin-angiotensin system. The revised text now includes citations to well-established studies in the field (Salonen Ros et al., 2000; Chappell LC et al., 2021; Brosens et al., 2002; Knofler et al., 2019; Redman CWG et al., 1999; LaMarca B et al., 2008). We believe these additions improve the scientific rigor of the manuscript.

(2) The introduction states "As a receptor for activin A, ACVR2A..." It's important to acknowledge that ACVR2A is also the receptor for other TGFB family members, with varying affinities and coreceptors. Several TGFB family members are known to regulate trophoblast differentiation and invasion. For example, BMP2 likely stimulates trophoblast invasion at least in part via ACVR2A (PMID 29846546).

Thank you for highlighting the broader role of ACVR2A as a receptor for multiple members of the TGF-β superfamily. We have revised the introduction to acknowledge that ACVR2A is not only the receptor for activin A but also interacts with other ligands, such as BMP2, which likely stimulates trophoblast invasion via ACVR2A (PMID: 29846546). This addition provides a more comprehensive view of ACVR2A's function in trophoblast biology. While the focus of our current study is on activin A, we agree that ACVR2A's role in mediating the effects of other TGF-β family members is an important topic for future research.

(3) An alternative hypothesis for the potential role of ACVR2A in preeclampsia is its functions in the endometrium. In the mouse ACVR2A knockout in the uterus (and other progesterone receptorexpressing cells) leads to embryo implantation failure.

Thank you for bringing up the potential role of ACVR2A in the endometrium as an alternative hypothesis. We have revised the discussion to acknowledge this possibility and cited relevant studies showing that uterine-specific knockout of ACVR2A in mice leads to embryo implantation failure (Monsivais et al., 2021). This suggests that ACVR2A may play a critical role in uterine receptivity and embryo implantation, which could influence placental development and preeclampsia pathogenesis. While our current study focuses on trophoblast-related functions of ACVR2A, we agree that investigating its role in the uterine environment is an important direction for future research.

(4) In the description of the patient population for placental sample collections, preeclampsia is defined only by hypertension, and this is described as being in accordance with ACOG guidelines. ACOG requires a finding of hypertension in combination with either proteinuria or one of the following: thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine, elevated liver enzymes, pulmonary, edema, and new onset unresponsive headache.

We appreciate the reviewer’s detailed observation regarding the definition of preeclampsia.

We have reviewed and clarified our description of the diagnostic criteria based on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines. Specifically, we have revised the definition in the Materials and Methods section under "Collection of Placenta and Decidua Specimens," as follows: In accordance with the guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2023), preeclampsia (PE) is diagnosed as hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg on at least two occasions) in combination with one or more of the following: proteinuria (≥300 mg/24-hour urine collection or protein/creatinine ratio ≥0.3), thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine, elevated liver enzymes, pulmonary edema, or new-onset headache unresponsive to treatment.

(5) I believe that Figures 1a and 1b are data from a previously published RNAseq dataset, though it is not entirely clear in the text. The methods section does not include a description of the analysis of these data undertaken here. It would be helpful to include at least a brief description of the study these data are taken from - how many samples, how were the PE/control groups defined, gestational age range, where is it from, etc. For the heatmap presented in B, what is the significance of the other genes/ why are they being shown? If the purpose of these two panels is to show differential expression specifically of ACVR2A in this dataset, that could be shown more directly.

Clarification of RNAseq dataset: The Methods section has been revised to specify the dataset source (GEO accession number: GSE114691), which includes 20 PE and 21 control placental samples with gestational ages ranging from 34 to 38 weeks. PE and control groups were defined using clinical criteria such as hypertension and proteinuria, and these details have also been added to the Results section. RNAseq analysis description: We have included details of the differential gene expression analysis in the Methods section. Specifically, the DESeq2 R package was used, with thresholds of FDR < 0.05 and |log2(fold change) | ≥ 1. The selection of WNT pathwayrelated genes in Figure 1B is based on these analyses. Significance of the heatmap genes: The genes displayed in Figure 1B were selected based on their significant differential expression and enrichment in pathways relevant to PE pathogenesis, such as the WNT signaling pathway. We have clarified this in the Results section and updated the figure legend to explain their biological relevance. Purpose of Figures 1A and 1B: Figure 1A emphasizes the downregulation of ACVR2A in PE placentas, while Figure 1B complements this by presenting differentially expressed genes associated with the WNT pathway. These figures collectively highlight the role of ACVR2A in PE and its connection to broader molecular pathways. Text descriptions have been updated to improve clarity and focus.

(6) More information is needed in the methods section to understand how the immunohistochemistry was quantified. "Quantitation was performed" is all that is provided. Was staining quantified across the whole image or only in anchoring villous areas? How were HRP & hematoxylin signals distinguished in ImageJ? How was the overall level of HRP/DAB development kept constant between the NC and PE groups?

Thank you for pointing out the need for more details regarding the quantification of immunohistochemistry (IHC). We have now clarified and expanded the description of the IHC quantification process in the Methods section as follows: Quantification Across the Entire Section: IHC staining was assessed across the entire tissue section to account for global expression patterns. For quantitative analysis, representative regions from the anchoring villous areas, where ACVR2A expression is most prominent, were selected for comparison between NC and PE groups. This ensured that the analysis focused on biologically relevant regions. ImageJ Analysis:

Images of stained sections were captured under identical magnifications and lighting conditions. Hematoxylin (blue, nuclear staining) and DAB/HRP (brown, protein-specific signal) were distinguished using ImageJ's color deconvolution plugin. The DAB/HRP signal was isolated and quantified based on the integrated optical density (IOD) within the selected regions. Consistency in HRP/DAB Development: To maintain consistency between NC and PE groups, all tissue samples were processed under identical experimental conditions, including the same antibody dilution, incubation times, and DAB/HRP development durations. Negative controls (without primary antibody) were included to monitor background staining, and the DAB reaction was stopped simultaneously across all samples to avoid overdevelopment. Statistical Analysis: The quantified DAB signal intensity was normalized to the area of the selected regions, and comparisons between NC and PE groups were performed using statistical tests (e.g., Student’s ttest). Results are reported as mean ± SD. We hope this additional detail addresses your concerns.

(7) In Figure 1E it is not immediately obvious to many readers where the EVT are. It is probably worth circling or putting an arrow to the little region of ACVR2A+ EVT that is shown in the higher magnification image in Figure 1E. These are actually easier to see in the pictures provided in the supplement Figure 1. Of note, the STB is also staining positive. This is worth pointing out in the results text.

Thank you for your suggestion regarding Figure 1E. To make the location of the ACVR2A+ extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs) more apparent, we have updated Figure 1E by adding arrows to indicate the regions of EVTs in the higher magnification image. Additionally, we have included annotations in the supplemental Figure S1 to further aid visualization. We appreciate your observation that syncytiotrophoblasts (STBs) also show positive staining for ACVR2A. We have revised the Results section to explicitly mention this finding and its potential significance.

(8) It is not possible to judge whether the IF images in 1F actually depict anchoring villi. The DAPI is really faint, and it's high magnification, so there isn't a lot of context. Would it be possible to include a lower magnification image that shows where these cells are located within a placental section? It is also somewhat surprising that this receptor is expressed in the cytoplasm rather than at the cell surface. How do the authors explain this?

Thank you for your suggestion to provide more context for the immunofluorescence (IF) images in Figure 1F. To address this, we have included lower magnification images in Supplementary Figure S2, showing the overall structure of the placental section and the location of the anchoring villi. These images help to contextualize the regions analyzed in Figure 1F, which were selected to clearly illustrate ACVR2A expression in extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs). In Figure 1F, we have focused on higher magnification images for better visualization of ACVR2A staining patterns in EVTs. Regarding the subcellular localization of ACVR2A, the receptor is predominantly expressed on the cell surface, as shown in our images. However, some intracellular staining is also observed, which may reflect receptor trafficking or recycling processes, consistent with the behavior of other activin receptors under physiological or pathological conditions. We have clarified these points in the Results and Discussion sections.

(9) The results text makes it sound like the data in Figure 2A are from NCBI & Protein atlas, but the legend says it is qPCR from this lab. The methods do not detail how these various cell lines were grown; only HTR-SVNeo cell culture is described. Similarly, JAR cells are used for several experiments and their culture is not described.

Thank you for pointing out the need for clarification regarding Figure 2A and cell culture methods. The data in Figure 2A were generated using RT-qPCR conducted in our laboratory, not solely based on data from NCBI or the Human Protein Atlas. We have revised the Results section to reflect this more accurately. Regarding the culture conditions, we acknowledge that the methods for other cell lines were not explicitly detailed. For this study, all cell lines, including JAR and other cancer cell lines, were cultured following standard protocols provided by the suppliers. Specifically, JAR cells and other cell lines were purchased from Wuhan Punosei Life Technology and were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin under standard conditions (37°C, 5% CO2). This information has been added to the Methods section for clarity.

(10) Under RT-qPCR methods, the phrase "cDNA reverse transcription cell RNA was isolated..." does not make any sense.

Thank you for pointing out the unclear phrasing in the RT-qPCR methods section. We agree that the original description was not precise. To address this, we have revised the relevant section to improve clarity and accuracy. Specifically, the methods now explicitly describe the two key steps: RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis. The revised text reads: Total RNA was isolated from cells using a Total RNA Extraction Kit (TIANGEN, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using a cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Japan) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer.

(11) The paragraph beginning "Consequently, a potential association..." is quite confusing. It mentions analyzing ACVR2A expression in placentas, but then doesn't point to any results of this kind and repeats describing the results in Figure 2a, from various cell lines.

Thank you for your comment regarding the paragraph beginning with "Consequently, a potential association...". We understand that the current wording may create confusion. The primary aim of this section is to compare ACVR2A expression levels across various cell lines, including trophoblast-derived and non-trophoblast cell lines, to highlight the relevance of ACVR2A in trophoblast function, particularly in invasion and migration. To address your concerns, we have revised the paragraph for clarity and logical flow. The updated text explicitly focuses on the comparison of ACVR2A expression across cell lines (Figure 2A) and how this supports the hypothesis that ACVR2A plays a key role in trophoblast invasion and migration. Additionally, the discussion of placental samples has been separated to avoid confusion with cell line results. We hope this revision resolves the issue.

(12) The authors should acknowledge that the effect of the ACVR2A knockout on proliferation makes it difficult to draw any conclusions from the trophoblast invasion assays. That is, there might be fewer migrating or invading cells in the knockout lines because there are fewer cells, not because the cells that are there are less invasive. Since this is a central conclusion of the study, it is a major drawback.

Thank you for highlighting this important point. We agree that the reduced proliferation observed in ACVR2A knockout cells could influence the results of the invasion assays, as fewer cells may inherently lead to reduced invasion. To minimize this effect, we conducted the invasion and migration assays under low-serum conditions (1–2% serum) to limit cell proliferation during the experimental timeframe. This approach was based on optimization trials and existing literature, as serum-free conditions were found to negatively impact cell viability and experimental reproducibility. While these efforts helped to mitigate the impact of proliferation on the results, we acknowledge this as a limitation of our study and have added this discussion to the manuscript. Future studies could incorporate approaches such as normalizing cell numbers or using additional proliferation-independent methods to confirm the findings. We hope this clarification and the steps taken address your concerns.

(13) The legend and the methods section do not agree on how many fields were selected for counting in the transwell invasion assays in Figure 3C. The methods section and the graph do not match the number of replicate experiments in Figure 3D (the number of replicate experiments isn't described for 3C).

Thank you for pointing out the inconsistencies regarding the number of fields counted and the number of replicates in the Transwell invasion assays (Figure 3C) and colony formation assays (Figure 3D). We apologize for the lack of clarity in the Methods section and figure legend. To address this, we have revised both the figure legends and the Methods section for consistency and added detailed descriptions. For Figure 3C, cell invasion was quantified by randomly selecting 5 fields of view per sample under 300× magnification. Images shown in the figure were taken at lower magnification to provide a better visual comparison between experimental and control groups. For Figure 3D, each experiment was independently repeated at least 10 times to ensure robust and reproducible results. These clarifications have been incorporated into the revised manuscript. We appreciate your feedback and believe this revision improves the clarity and transparency of our methods.

(14) Discussion says "Transcriptome sequencing analysis revealed low ACVR2A expression in placental samples from PE patients, consistent with GWAS results across diverse populations." The authors should explain this briefly. Why would SNPs in ACVR2A necessarily affect levels of the transcript?

Thank you for raising this important point. We acknowledge that our study did not directly investigate how SNPs in the ACVR2A gene affect transcript levels. However, prior studies have suggested that SNPs can influence gene expression through various mechanisms. For example, SNPs in regulatory regions (e.g., promoters, enhancers, or untranslated regions) may affect transcription factor binding, RNA stability, or splicing efficiency, ultimately altering transcript levels. While we did not directly assess the functional consequences of ACVR2A SNPs in this study, the observed downregulation of ACVR2A in PE placentas aligns with the potential regulatory impact of SNPs previously identified in GWAS studies. To address this, we have revised the Discussion section to clarify the relationship between SNPs and transcript levels and acknowledge this limitation.

(15) "The expression levels of ACVR2A mRNA were comparable to those of tumor cells such as A549. This discovery suggested a potential pivotal role of ACVR2A in the biological functions of trophoblast cells, especially in the nurturing layer." Alternatively, ACVR2A expression resembles that of tumors because the cell lines used here are tumor cells (JAR) or immortalized cells (HTR8). These lines are widely used to study trophoblast properties, but the discussion should at least acknowledge the possibility that the behavior of these cells does not always resemble normal trophoblasts.

Thank you for pointing out this important limitation. We agree that the JAR and HTR8/SVneo cell lines, being tumor-derived or immortalized, may not fully replicate the behavior of normal trophoblast cells. While these cell lines are widely used as models for studying trophoblast properties due to their ease of culture and invasive behavior, their gene expression and signaling pathways could partially reflect their tumorigenic or immortalized origins. We have revised the Discussion section to acknowledge this limitation and clarify the interpretation of ACVR2A expression levels in these cells.

(16) The authors should discuss some of what is known about the relationship between the TCF7/c-JUN pathway and the major signaling pathway activated by ACVR2A, Smad 2/3/4. The Wnt and TGFB family cross-talk is quite complex and it has been studied in other systems.

Thank you for highlighting the relationship between the TCF7/c-JUN pathway and Smad2/3/4 signaling. In our study, we chose to focus on Smad1/5 due to its strong association with ACVR2A in placental development, as demonstrated in a recent study(DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23571-5). This study showed that the BMP signaling pathway, mediated through ACVR2A-Smad1/5, is essential for endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation. While Smad2/3/4 are wellestablished mediators of TGF-β signaling, Smad1/5 activation is more directly linked to ACVR2A in the context of reproductive biology.

In PE placentas, we observed a significant downregulation of Smad1/5 expression, which supports the hypothesis that ACVR2A-mediated Smad signaling is disrupted in this condition. Although we did not directly assess Smad2/3/4 in this study, prior research has shown that Smad2/3 can interact with TCF/LEF transcription factors to regulate Wnt-related target genes, suggesting potential cross-talk between these pathways. We have now clarified this rationale and included a discussion of these interactions in the revised manuscript.

Recommendations for the authors:

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Several points need to be addressed to improve the clarity and robustness of the presented findings:

(1) From a clinical perspective, several concerns arise regarding the interpretation of these findings. First, the small sample size of 20 patients may not be representative of the broader population, limiting the generalizability of the results. Additionally, although no significant differences in age and pre-pregnancy BMI were observed between the PE and normal control groups, other clinical variables, such as hypertension or gestational diabetes, may also influence ACVR2A expression and contribute to PE development. Furthermore, while the study suggests a correlation between reduced ACVR2A expression and PE, it remains unclear whether this association holds true across different subtypes of PE or whether there are other underlying clinical factors that could account for these changes in gene expression. These factors need to be considered in future studies to better understand the clinical relevance of ACVR2A in PE.

Thank you for raising these insightful concerns about the clinical interpretation of our findings. We agree that the small sample size of 20 patients may limit the generalizability of our results. To address this, we are actively expanding our cohort by collecting additional clinical samples from PE patients and normotensive controls. This effort aims to strengthen the robustness of our findings and provide stronger evidence for the role of ACVR2A in PE. We would also like to clarify that, during the initial sample collection, we specifically included only PE patients without comorbidities such as gestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, or other pregnancy-related complications. This strict selection criterion was implemented to minimize the potential influence of confounding clinical variables and ensure that our findings specifically reflect the association between ACVR2A expression and PE. While our study provides important initial insights, we recognize the need for larger-scale studies to validate these findings. The ongoing collection of clinical samples will allow us to address this limitation and enhance the translational relevance of our research. We have revised the manuscript to reflect these points and highlight our plans to strengthen the study by increasing the sample size.

(2) The section "Precision Genome Surgery: ACVR2A Knockout via CRISPR/Cas9" in the results contains some issues with expression details. The results section should be more structured, with data presented in a more detailed and clear manner, ensuring that there is a clear connection between each experimental step and its corresponding result. For example, the sentence "Following multiple rounds of monoclonal culture, genotype identification, RT-qPCR and Western blotting (WB) analysis for screening, specific double-knockout monoclonal cell lines were distinctly chosen" contains redundant phrasing and unnecessary details, which affect the flow of the text.

Thank you for your constructive feedback on the “Precision Genome Surgery: ACVR2A Knockout via CRISPR/Cas9” section. We agree that this section can be better structured to present the data in a more detailed and coherent manner. To address this, we have reorganized the results into distinct steps, ensuring a clear connection between each experimental step and its corresponding result. Redundant phrasing has been removed to improve the flow and readability of the text. The revised section emphasizes the purpose of each step, the screening process, and the specific results obtained.

(3) The figure legends and panel labels in Figure 3 should be revised to ensure clarity and consistency. The figure legend should specify the exact panels (e.g., Figure 3A, 3B, 3C, etc.) and clearly describe the experimental conditions and results shown in each part.

Thank you for pointing out the need for improved clarity and consistency in the figure legends and panel labels for Figure 3. We have revised the figure legend to specify each panel (e.g., Figure 3A, 3B, 3C, etc.) and included detailed descriptions of the experimental conditions and results displayed in each part. These updates aim to ensure better understanding and alignment between the figure legend and the panels.

(4) Lack of In Vivo Validation of ACVR2A Knockout: The study does not include in vivo experiments to validate the effects of ACVR2A knockout. It would be important to investigate whether similar regulatory effects of ACVR2A on trophoblast cell migration and invasion can be observed in animal models or in larger clinical studies. The lack of in vivo data raises questions about the translational relevance of the findings.

Thank you for highlighting the importance of in vivo validation to assess the translational relevance of our findings. While we acknowledge that in vivo experiments could provide additional insights into the role of ACVR2A in trophoblast migration and invasion, this study was primarily designed as an in vitro investigation to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying ACVR2A function in trophoblast cells. The choice of an in vitro model allowed us to perform precise and controlled mechanistic analyses, which are critical for establishing a foundation for future research. We agree that in vivo studies using animal models or larger clinical cohorts are important next steps to validate the regulatory effects of ACVR2A on trophoblast function and its contribution to PE pathogenesis. These directions will be pursued in future research to further establish the translational potential of our findings. We have included this perspective in the revised Discussion section.

(5) TCF7/c-JUN Pathway in Clinical Samples: In the study of the TCF7/c-JUN pathway, the authors mention assessing protein expression in clinical samples through immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, the manuscript does not provide a clear explanation of how the findings from laboratory cell models (such as HTR8/SVneo and JAR) relate to the clinical samples. Specifically, while ACVR2A knockout is shown to affect these proteins at the cellular level, it is unclear whether this effect is observed in clinical samples. Therefore, further validation of the TCF7/c-JUN pathway in the cell models and exploration of its relationship with protein expression in clinical samples is necessary. Additional experiments, such as immunofluorescence staining or mass spectrometry, could further confirm the role of the TCF7/c-JUN pathway in cells and provide a more direct comparison with clinical data.

Thank you for highlighting the need to connect findings from cell models to clinical samples, particularly with respect to the TCF7/c-JUN pathway. In response to your comment, we conducted additional experiments using Western blot analysis to evaluate the expression of ACVR2A, SMAD1/5, SMAD4, pSMAD1/5/9, and TCF7L1/TCF7L2 in PE placental tissues compared to normotensive controls (Figure 7A). The results demonstrated significantly reduced expression of these proteins in PE placentas, providing evidence that disruptions in the ACVR2A-SMAD and TCF7/c-JUN signaling pathways observed in vitro are also present in clinical samples.

These findings strengthen the translational relevance of our study by directly linking the molecular mechanisms identified in cell models to clinical observations. We have updated the Results and Discussion sections to incorporate these new data, and we believe this addition addresses your concern about the relationship between in vitro and clinical findings.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. He F. 2024. ACVR2A Facilitates Trophoblast Cell Invasion through TCF7/c-JUN Pathway in Pre-eclampsia Progression. NCBI BioProject. PRJNA1250493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    2. Awamleh Z, Gloor GB, Han V. 2019. Placental transcriptome in pregnancies complicated by Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preeclampsia (PE) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE114691

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Original western blot shown in Figure 1C (labelled).
    Figure 1—source data 2. Original western blot shown in Figure 1C.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original gel image of ACVR2A shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1A (labelled).
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original gel image of ACVR2A shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 1A.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Original western blot shown in Figure 2E (labelled).
    Figure 2—source data 2. Original western blot shown in Figure 2E.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original agarose gel electrophoresis gel patterns shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1 (labelled).
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original agarose gel electrophoresis gel patterns shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
    Figure 7—source data 1. Original data related to Figure 7A western blot (labelled).
    Figure 7—source data 2. Original data related to Figure 7A western blot.
    Figure 7—source data 3. Original data related to Figure 7A western blot.
    Supplementary file 1. Clinical characteristics of pre-eclamptic and normal control pregnancies.
    elife-101236-supp1.docx (14.8KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 2. Sequences of the primers for RT-qPCR.
    elife-101236-supp2.docx (14.8KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 3. Sequences of the genotyping primers.
    elife-101236-supp3.docx (13.8KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 4. Details of immunohistochemical antibodies.
    elife-101236-supp4.docx (14.8KB, docx)
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    Sequencing data is available from the NCBI database, PRJNA1250493.

    The following dataset was generated:

    He F. 2024. ACVR2A Facilitates Trophoblast Cell Invasion through TCF7/c-JUN Pathway in Pre-eclampsia Progression. NCBI BioProject. PRJNA1250493

    The following previously published dataset was used:

    Awamleh Z, Gloor GB, Han V. 2019. Placental transcriptome in pregnancies complicated by Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preeclampsia (PE) NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE114691


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES