Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 May 30;109(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s00253-025-13520-3

Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the synthesis of aromatic compounds

Jan Marienhagen 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12125101  PMID: 40447952

Abstract

Abstract

A significant proportion of industrially important small molecules are aromatic, and the majority of these compounds are produced chemically, relying heavily on fossil resources. In bacteria and plants, the shikimate pathway and related biosynthetic routes serve as the primary sources of aromatic compounds. Microbial cell factories, which are poised to play a central role in the emerging bio-based economy, provide a sustainable alternative for producing commercially valuable aromatics from renewable resources. Corynebacterium glutamicum, already established as an industrial workhorse for the large-scale production of various amino acids, can be engineered to overproduce aromatic compounds derived from the shikimate pathway. Furthermore, the functional integration of heterologous or synthetic pathways enables access to high-value natural products, such as plant polyphenols and other polyketides. This review highlights recent advancements in the metabolic engineering of C. glutamicum for the sustainable production of these aromatic compounds.

Key points

 C. glutamicum’s high tolerance to aromatic compounds is key to aromatics production.

 Detailed physiological insights enable access to shikimate pathway-derived products.

• Diverse plant (poly)phenols and other aromatic polyketides can be produced.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name 253_2025_13520_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: Corynebacterium glutamicum, Metabolic engineering, Aromatic, Aromatic compound, Shikimate pathway, Plant polyphenol, Polyketide

Introduction

Aromatic compounds constitute a diverse class of chemicals with numerous industrial applications, including their use as organic solvents, dyes, fuels, food, and feed additives, as well as building blocks for pharmaceuticals and polymer materials (Noda and Kondo 2017; Averesch and Krömer 2018). Currently, the vast majority of aromatic chemicals are produced through the chemical conversion of BTX (benzene, toluene, and xylene) derived from petroleum-based feedstocks or natural gas (Krömer et al. 2013). However, growing concerns over the consumption of fossil resources and the environmental impacts of chemical production, in particular significant CO2 emissions, have spurred efforts to develop more sustainable production methods in recent years (Dickey et al. 2021). Alternatively, catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass feedstocks (e.g., lignin) to bio-oil offers a potential pathway for producing commercially interesting aromatics, but faces challenges such as low catalyst stability, high-energy requirements, and the accumulation of undesired by-products (Yildiz et al. 2016; Nekhaev and Maksimov 2021).

In comparison, microbial production of aromatic compounds represents a promising alternative with several advantages. Typically, microbial production from abundant and inexpensive sugar feedstocks is more environmentally friendly compared to chemical synthesis, since it avoids the use of heavy metals, organic solvents, and strong acids or bases. Additionally, microorganisms exhibit rapid growth, enabling short production times, and microbial fermentation processes are scalable—from laboratory bench-top experiments to industrial-scale fermenters with capacities of several hundred cubic meters (Nielsen et al. 2022). Most bacteria and archaea, but also protozoa, fungi, algae, and plants (but notably not animals!) possess the metabolic capacity to synthesize various aromatic compounds via the shikimate pathway, a source of both, aromatic and nonaromatic compounds with commercial value (Herrmann and Weaver 1999; Shende et al. 2024). To harness the potential of the shikimate pathway for producing valuable small aromatic molecules, organisms such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been studied for many years (Jiang and Zhang 2016; Liu et al. 2020).

Another microorganism considered to be well suited for the production of aromatic compounds is Corynebacterium glutamicum, a Gram-positive, non-motile and non-pathogenic soil bacterium. This organism has been adopted industrially for the production of proteinogenic amino acids since its discovery as l-glutamate-overproducing microorganism in Japan more than 70 years ago (Kinoshita et al. 1957). C. glutamicum demonstrates several physiological properties advantageous to fermentative microbial production, such as (i) high sugar consumption rates under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions, regardless of cell density, (ii) a strong tolerance to osmotic stress, and (iii) the capability of simultaneously utilizing sugar mixtures without carbon catabolite repression (Kogure and Inui 2018; Zha et al. 2023). Extensive scientific work in laboratories worldwide has provided a comprehensive physiological and genetic understanding of this organism. This work facilitated the development of detailed genome-scale models and advanced -omics tools for its global analysis (Parise et al. 2020; Gong et al. 2024). In addition, numerous methods for the genetic manipulation of C. glutamicum are available, enabling the metabolic engineering of this bacterium for diverse applications (Nešvera and Pátek 2011; Jiang et al. 2017). Hence, it is no surprise that these extensive research efforts turned C. glutamicum into a versatile microbial platform organism for the synthesis of approximately 100 small molecules of biotechnological interest. These compounds include alcohols, organic acids, amino acid derivatives, diamines, fatty acids, and terpenoids (Wolf et al. 2021; Zha et al. 2023). In this context, it is astonishing that the potential of C. glutamicum for producing aromatic compounds beyond aromatic amino acids is relatively underutilized. The described high resistance to increased concentrations of cytotoxic aromatic compounds such as hydroxybenzoic acids or phenylpropanoids would be a significant advantage of C. glutamicum–based cell factories for aromatics production (Kallscheuer et al. 2016a; Kitade et al. 2018). For instance, in direct comparison to Pseudomonas putida, another robust biotechnological workhorse, C. glutamicum grows faster and reaches a higher biomass yield when cultivated in the presence of 10 g L−1 anthranilate (Kuepper et al. 2020). This tolerance of C. glutamicum is partly attributed to the characteristic outer membrane rich in mycolic acids, which acts as a permeability barrier (Marchand et al. 2012). Additionally, the extensive catabolic network for the degradation of aromatic compounds in C. glutamicum is well understood, and can easily be manipulated to enable the accumulation of valuable pathway intermediates or to prevent the degradation of precursor molecules or target compounds (Kallscheuer et al. 2016a).

In this review, I summarize advances in metabolic engineering of C. glutamicum for the synthesis of aromatics over the past 10 years, covering shikimate pathway–derived compounds, plant (poly)phenols, and other polyketides.

Production of shikimate pathway intermediates and aromatic amino acids

The canonical shikimate pathway, which also represents the primary route for the biosynthesis of aromatic compounds in C. glutamicum, begins with an enzyme-catalyzed aldol-like condensation of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), derived from glycolysis, and d-erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P), originating from the pentose phosphate pathway (Fig. 1). This decisive reaction, yielding 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP), is catalyzed by two feedback-regulated DAHP-synthase isoenzymes (AroF, AroG). The pathway then proceeds through a series of six additional enzymatic steps, culminating in the formation of chorismate (CHO), a central precursor for the synthesis of the three aromatic amino acids l-phenylalanine (PHE), l-tryptophan (TRP), and l-tyrosine (TYR) (Fig. 2) as well as folate (vitamin B9) and ubiquinone-10 (coenzyme Q10).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic overview of the shikimate pathway in C. glutamicum and relevant metabolic pathways to biotechnologically interesting aromatic compounds derived thereof. Compound names and (heterologous) enzymes are indicated. Genes for the encoding enzymes are given in brackets. Precursors, co-substrates, intermediates, and products (for the sake of consistency, all carboxyl groups are depicted in their protonated state): 4HB, 4-hydroxybenzoate; 4HBAL, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde; ARB, β-arbutin; CHO, chorismate; DAHP, 3-deoxy-d-arabinoheptulosonate-7-phosphate; DHQ, 3-dehydroquinate; DHS, 3-dehydroshikimate; E4P, erythrose 4-phosphate; EPSP, 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate; HQ, hydroquinone; PCA, protocatechuate; PCAL, protocatechuic aldehyde; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PYR, pyruvate; S3P, shikimate-3-phosphate; SA, shikimate; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; UDP, uracil-diphosphate; UDP-glucose, uracil-diphosphate glucose; VAN, vanillin; VNA, vanillate. Enzymes (genes): 4HBH (pobA), 4-hydroxybenzoate-3-hydroxylase; 4HB1H (MNX1), 4-hydroxybenzoate-1-hydroxylase (Candida parapsilosis CBS604); CAR, (car) carboxylic acid reductase (e.g., Nocardia iowensis); CHPL (ubiC), chorismate-pyruvate lyase (E. coli); CS (aroC), chorismate synthase; COMT (y200L), catechol-O-methyltransferase (Rattus norvegicus); DAHPS (aroG, aroF), 3-deoxy-arabinoheptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase; DHQD (aroD), 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase; DHQS (aroB), 3-dehydroquinate synthase; DHSD (qsuB), dehydroshikimate dehydratase; EPSPS (aroA), 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase; HQG (as), hydroquinone UDP-dependent glycosyltransferase (β-arbutin synthase, Rauvolfia serpentin); QSDH (qsuD), quinate/shikimate dehydrogenase; SDH (aroE), shikimate dehydrogenase; SK (aroK), shikimate kinase

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic overview of metabolic strategies starting from chorismate, which are leading to the three aromatic amino acids and other compounds of biotechnological interest in C. glutamicum. Precursors, co-substrates, intermediates and products (for the sake of consistency, all carboxyl groups are depicted in their protonated state): 2HB, 2-hydroxybenzoate (salicylate); 2PE, 2-phenylethanol; 3HB, 3-hydroxybenzoate; 4 AHB, 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzoate; 4 ADC, 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate; AKG, α-ketoglutarate; ANT, anthranilate; ARO, arogenate (pretyrosine); CA, para-coumarate (4-hydroxycinnamic acid); CDRP, 1-(2-carboxyphenylamino)−1-deoxy-d-ribulose-5-phosphate; CHO, chorismate; DOPA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-l-alanine; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; HPAL, hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde; HPPY, hydroxyphenylpyruvate; ICHO, isochorismate; IGP, indole-3-glycerol phosphate; IND, indole; MANT, methylanthranilate; PABA, para-aminobenzoate; PHE, l-phenylalanine; PPA, phenylpyruvate; PRA, N-(5'-phosphoribosyl) anthranilate; PPAL, phenylacetaldehyde; PPRP, phosphoribosylpyrophosphate; PRP, prephenate; PYR, pyruvate; SAH, S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine; SAL, salidroside; SAM, S-adenosyl-l-methionine; TRP, l-tryptophan; TYO, tyrosol; TYR, l-tyrosine; TYRA, tyramine; UDP, uracil-diphosphate; UDP-glucose, uracil-diphosphate glucose. Enzymes (genes): 3HBS (hyg5), chorismatase (3-hydroxybenzoate synthase, Streptomyces hygroscopicus); 4HBH (cvphbh), 4-hydroxybenzoate-3-hydroxylase (e.g., Caulobacter vibrioides); ADH (yahK, yqhD), alcohol dehydrogenase (E. coli); ADL (pabC), 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate lyase (e.g., Xenorhabdus bovienii); ADS (pabAB), 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate synthase component I and I (e.g., Corynebacterium callunae); ANS (trpEG), anthranilate synthase; ANTM (aamt1), anthranilate methyltransferase (Zea mays); APRT (trpD), anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase; ARDH (tyrA), arogenate dehydrogenase; AT (dapC, ilvE, aroT), aminotransferase; CM (csm), chorismate mutase; ICS (irp9), isochorismate synthase/isochorismate pyruvate lyase (salicylate synthase, Yersinia enterocolitica); IGPS (trpCF), indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase; UDPG (osugt13), UDP-dependent glycosyltransferase (Oryza sativa); PDH (pheA), prephenate dehydratase; PRAI (trpCF), phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase; KID (aro10), 2-ketoisovalerate decarboxylase (Saccharomyces cerevisiae); TAL (tal), phenylalanine/tyrosine ammonia lyase (Flavobacterium johnsoniae); TN (tnaA), tryptophanase (e.g., Providencia rettgeri); TO (tyo) tyramine oxidase (Kocuria rhizophila); TS (trpAB), tryptophan synthase; TYD (aadc), tyrosine decarboxylase (e.g., Levilactobacillus brevis); TYRO (tyr), tyrosinase (Ralstonia solanacearum)

The eponymous and nonaromatic intermediate in the pathway is shikimate (SA), which has commercial value. SA has attracted significant interest as a pharmaceutical building block, most notably as precursor for the industrial synthesis of the anti-influenza drug Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate) (Jackson et al. 2011). In 2015, a C. glutamicum variant capable of accumulating up to 11.3 g L−1 of SA in fed-batch cultivations was reported (Zhang et al. 2015). To construct this strain, modularized gene libraries encoding the first four enzymes of the shikimate pathway were screened to identify the best SA-accumulating variants. These enzymes include DAHP synthase (DAHPS, encoded by aroG), 3-dehydroquinate synthase (DHQS, encoded by aroB), 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase (DHQD, encoded by aroD), and SA dehydrogenase (SDH, encoded by aroE) (Fig. 1). The best-performing enzyme combination was then implemented in a C. glutamicum strain with deletion of the aroK-gene. This gene encodes the essential shikimate kinase (SK), which phosphorylates SA to shikimate-3-phosphate (S3P) (Fig. 1). As a result, the SA-producer was auxotrophic for all three aromatic amino acids and para-aminobenzoate (PABA) requiring supplementation with complex medium components for growth and SA production. In another study, a C. glutamicum R variant capable of utilizing xylose and arabinose in combination with glucose was reengineered to accumulate SA (Kogure et al. 2016). This strain was also devoid of any SK activity, rendering it auxotrophic for PHE, TRP, TYR, and PABA, and also carried a plasmid for the episomal expression of aroGBDE. Furthermore, two other genes (qsuB, dehydroshikimate dehydratase (DHSD) and qsuD, quinate/SA dehydrogenase (QSDH) (Fig. 1) involved in the consumption of SA and its precursor molecules 3-dehydroshikimate (DHS) and 3-dehydroquinate (DHQ) were disrupted. Additional modifications of glucose uptake (elimination of the phosphotransferase (PTS) system) and its conversion via the glycolysis to improve PEP availability allowed for the construction of the final variant capable of accumulating up to 141 g L−1 SA from glucose as sole carbon and energy source in high-density resting cell fermentations. Under similar conditions, 137 g L−1 SA could be obtained when a mixture of glucose, xylose, and arabinose was used as substrate. Notably, several shikimate pathway intermediates, particularly DHS, accumulated at gram-scale levels. More recently, Sato and coworkers constructed a genetically similar C. glutamicum variant for SA production, maintaining an unmodified phosphotransferase system while integrating additional chromosomal copies of selected genes involved in the shikimate pathway (aroGBE) (Sato et al. 2020). In complex medium supplemented with the three essential aromatic amino acids and PABA, the strain accumulated 13.1 g L−1 SA from glucose under batch conditions. Additionally, the strain was engineered to utilize cellobiose by expressing a β-glucosidase gene and secretion of this corresponding enzyme. Under the same cultivation conditions, SA accumulation reached 13.8 g L−1, with yield comparable to that obtained from glucose.

Anthranilate (ANT) is not an intermediate of the shikimate pathway, but is directly synthesized from CHO by ANT synthase (ANS), and represents the first intermediate in the biosynthetic route to TRP (Fig. 2). ANT can be used for the production of polyurethanes and as precursor for various food additives and dyes (Wiklund and Bergman 2006). To construct a C. glutamicum–based ANT producer, the trpD gene, encoding the anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT), was deleted (Luo et al. 2019). As a result, the modified variant became TRP-auxotrophic, since APRT catalyzes the essential step converting ANT to N-(5'-phosphoribosyl) anthranilate (PRA) during TRP biosynthesis. Similar to the strategy employed for constructing SA-producing C. glutamicum variants, qsuB and qsuD were deleted to eliminate competing pathways for protocatechuate and quinate synthesis, respectively. Additionally, promoter replacement was performed to enhance the expression of aroB and aroK. Further optimization included episomal expression of a feedback-resistant gene for an AroG variant, along with minor modifications in sugar metabolism. These metabolic engineering strategies enabled the strain to accumulate 26.4 g L−1 ANT during fed-batch cultivation in defined medium with TRP supplementation. More recently, a prototrophic C. glutamicum variant for ANT production was constructed, which eliminated the need for TRP supplementation. This strain produced 5.9 g L−1 ANT in fed-batch bioreactor cultivations, using a glucose-xylose mixture as carbon source (Mutz et al. 2024). Similar to the approach by Luo et al., this strain carries a plasmid encoding a feedback-resistant DAHPS to enhance the flux into the shikimate pathway. Additional modifications included modulation of the translation efficiency of aroK (to increase overall SK activity) and trpD (to reduce APRT activity) by start codon replacements, thereby minimizing ANT conversion toward TRP biosynthesis. However, the most significant improvement in ANT production was achieved by introducing an engineered ANS variant that is unresponsive to feedback inhibition by TRP. To develop this optimized enzyme, component I of ANS (TrpE) was engineered using a biosensor-guided in vivo screening strategy to identify suitable variants (Flachbart et al. 2021). In a separate study, adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) was employed to enhance C. glutamicum’s tolerance to ANT. Through sequential batch cultivations in shake flasks in the presence of ANT concentrations up to 25 g L−1, a variant with improved tolerance was obtained (Kuepper et al. 2020). In comparison to the C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 wild type, the best-performing evolved variant exhibited a 2.2-fold increased growth rate and a 1.4-fold higher final optical density of the culture. However, the specific mutations responsible for enhanced ANT tolerance remain to be identified.

The microbial production of the three aromatic amino acids using C. glutamicum has a long-standing history (Ikeda 2006). However, over the past decade, only a few studies have focused on engineering this bacterium to enhance the production. PHE is produced for medical-, pharmaceutical-, feed-, and nutritional applications. In particular for the synthesis of aspartame, an artificial, non-saccharide sweetener used in foods and beverages PHE is required (Bang et al. 2021). With the aim of constructing a PHE-overproducing strain, Zhang and colleagues overexpressed genes from the shikimate pathway and central sugar metabolism in a variant that already carried endogenous but engineered genes encoding a feedback-resistant DAHPS (AroF) and the prephenate dehydratase (PDH, PheA), both key enzymes in PHE biosynthesis (Fig. 2) (Zhang et al. 2015). Subsequently, the accumulation of PHE and SA was evaluated to identify additional targets for metabolic engineering. Combinatorial expression of identified key genes revealed that moderate expression of genes involved in conversions upstream of SA, combined with stronger expression of genes downstream of SA, was most effective for maximizing PHE synthesis while minimizing SA accumulation. Further modifications including improved sugar uptake, reduced PHE (re)uptake (by inactivating the gene for the transporter AroP), and elimination of acetate and lactate formation, contributed to the engineering of the best-performing variant. This strain accumulated 15.6 g L−1 PHE in fed-batch fermentations containing glucose and corn steep liquor. Interestingly, a PHE-antimetabolite screening using 4-fluorophenylalanine, published nine years later, identified mutations in three of the previously identified key target genes contributing to PHE overproduction: aroG (isoenzyme of aroF), pheA and aroP (Tachikawa et al. 2024). A C. glutamicum variant engineered for episomal overexpression of the mutated aroG and pheA variants and with a chromosomal deletion of aroP allowed for the production of up to 6.11 g L−1 PHE in shake flask cultivations.

TRP is a nutritional supplement, has several medical applications, and is added to poultry and livestock feed to enhance growth rates, reproduction, and overall animal health (Ikeda 2006). For the production of TRP using C. glutamicum, a strain devoid of any chorismate mutase (CM) activity was constructed by deleting the essential CM-encoding csm gene in a strain background with various chromosomal modifications of genes involved in the shikimate pathway, leading to PHE- and TYR-auxotrophy (Fig. 2) (Mindt et al. 2023). To alleviate attenuation control of the endogenous trp operon, which encodes all enzymes of the biosynthetic pathway from CHO to TRP, the gene for the leader peptide trpL was also deleted. In addition, the strain was engineered through chromosomal expression of a mutated, endogenous trpE gene encoding a TRP-insensitive ANS variant. This was complemented by episomal heterologous expression of an additional TRP-insensitive trpE copy from E. coli, along with the trpD gene for the other ANS subunit in the same bacterium. The resulting strain accumulated 2.11 g L−1 TRP in shake flask cultivations.

Metabolic engineering at the pathway branch points of CHO and prephenate (PRP) were also the first step towards constructing a C. glutamicum production strain for TYR (Fig. 2) (Kurpejović et al. 2023). TYR is utilized in the biosynthesis of catecholamine neurotransmitters (e.g., dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine), hormones, and melanin, with applications in neuropharmacology, metabolic disorder treatments, and dietary supplementation (Lütke-Eversloh et al. 2007). To achieve TYR production, the start codons of the coding sequences of trpE, pheA, and pat (also known as aroT, encoding an aminotransferase) were altered from the canonical ATG to the less preferred TTG in the chromosome, aiming to redirect pathway flux to TYR biosynthesis. Evaluation of the resulting variants revealed that the start codon modification of pheA had the most pronounced effect on TYR-production. However, this came at the cost of PHE bradytrophy, which could be mitigated by supplementing 0.5 mM PHE. Unlike some of the aforementioned studies, neither deletion of qsuABD nor elimination of PTS-mediated glucose uptake had a positive effect on product formation in this strain background. Nonetheless, the functional implementation of the isomerase pathway, achieved through the overexpression of genes encoding a xylose isomerase and a xylulokinase, enabled the co-utilization of xylose as carbon and energy source. The highest TYR concentrations obtained during batch cultivations in shake flasks were 3.2 g L−1 on glucose and 3.6 g L−1 on a 1:3 (w/v) glucose-xylose mixture.

Products derived of the shikimate pathway

Protocatechuate (PCA) is a naturally occurring aromatic acid with notable properties including antioxidant, antiviral and anticancer activity effects against various human cancer cell lines (Song et al. 2020). PCA can be synthesized through two metabolic routes (1) dehydration of the shikimate pathway intermediate DHS, catalyzed by the DHSD, or (2) hydroxylation of 4-hydroxybenzoate (4HB) by the 4-hydroxybenzoate-3-hydroxylase (4HBH) (Fig. 1). The latter precursor, 4HB, can be directly derived from CHO through the activity of a chorismate lyase (CHPL). Okai and colleagues opted for the latter metabolic strategy utilizing the CHPL UbiC from E. coli (Okai et al. 2016). The gene encoding this enzyme was heterologously expressed in an undisclosed PHE-producing C. glutamicum F (ATCC 21420) variant, enabling the production of 1.14 g L−1 PCA from glucose during fed-batch bioreactor cultivations. Two years later, a C. glutamicum strain was engineered to produce PCA via DHSD-mediated dehydration of DHS (Kallscheuer and Marienhagen 2018). To prevent PCA degradation, the C. glutamicum DelAro5 variant lacking the β-ketoadipate pathway, the gentisate pathway, and other catabolic routes for aromatics to prevent PCA degradation was used. In combination with reduced citrate synthase activity for improved precursor availability and heterologous expression of a feedback-insensitive DAHPS from E. coli, this C. glutamicum strain accumulated up to 2.0 g L−1 PCA from glucose in shake flask cultivations. In a subsequent study, this strain was equipped with a plasmid for the episomal expression of genes encoding xylose isomerase and xylulokinase facilitating xylose utilization to enhance E4P availability (Labib et al. 2021). Additionally, the endogenous pyk gene encoding pyruvate kinase was deleted in this strain to increase the intracellular PEP pool, enabling growth-decoupled PCA synthesis when xylose was the sole carbon source. Under growth-decoupled bioreactor conditions, PCA accumulation reached 9.5 g L−1, when glucose and xylose were used as orthogonal carbon substrates for biocatalyst provision and product synthesis, respectively. Kogure and coworkers demonstrated that both aforementioned routes to PCA can be utilized simultaneously to enhance product formation (Kogure et al. 2021). With the best strain, concentrations of up to 82.7 g L−1 PCA were achieved with growth-arrested cells cultured at high densities.

Notably, PCA also serves as precursor for pseudoaromatic dicarboxylic acids, such as 2-pyrone-4,6-dicarboxylic acid or 2,4-pyridine dicarboxylic acid. Since these compounds are not true aromatics, they are not discussed here. Nonetheless, it is worth mentioning that C. glutamicum has recently been engineered to produce such compounds at gram scale (Cho et al. 2024).

The previously mentioned 4HB is not only a direct precursor of PCA; it is also a product of biotechnological interest, similar to other monohydroxylated benzoic acids such as 2-hydroxybenzoate (2HB) and 3-hydroxybenzoate (3HB). While 3HB and 4HB serve as polymer building blocks, 2HB—also known as salicylic acid—is the precursor of acetylsalicylic acid, better known as the painkiller aspirin (del Olmo et al. 2017). In the same study investigating the aforementioned PCA production from DHS, it could be demonstrated that 2HB, 3HB and 4HB can be synthesized from CHO (Fig. 1, Fig. 2) (Kallscheuer and Marienhagen 2018). The C. glutamicum DelAro5-strain lacking the catabolic network for aromatics degradation was successfully converted into a 2HB producer. Upon functional expression of the irp9 gene—encoding a bifunctional isochorismate synthase/isochorismate pyruvate lyase (ICS, salicylate synthase) from Yersinia enterocolitica—this strain synthesized up to 0.01 g L−1 2HB (Fig. 2). Streptomyces hygroscopicus is known to possess the 3-hydroxybenzoate synthase (3HBS, chorismatase) Hyg5, which catalyzes hydrolysis and concomitant dehydration of CHO leading to 3HB. Up to 0.03 g L−1 3HB could be synthesized by C. glutamicum DelAro5 upon functional episomal implementation of a codon-optimized hyg5 gene (Fig. 2). For 4HB production, CHPL UbiC from E. coli was used, allowing for a final product titer of 3.3 g L−1 4HB (Fig. 1) (Kallscheuer and Marienhagen 2018). In the same year, a very similar C. glutamicum strain for 4HB was reported (Syukur Purwanto et al. 2018). This strain was auxotrophic for all three aromatic amino acids due to deletions of trpE and csm, essential genes encoding the ANS subunit TrpE and CSM. Combined with expression of a gene for a CHPL with reduced sensitivity to product inhibition, and extensive modifications of the shikimate pathway the resulting variant produced up to 19 g L−1 4HB in fed-batch fermentations, using complex medium with the essential supplementation of PHE, TRP and TYR. Simultaneously, similar efforts by Kitade and colleagues culminated in a highly engineered C. glutamicum R variant expressing a highly active ubiC gene from Providencia rustigianii. This strain accumulated up to 36.6 g L−1 4HB in jar fermenters using aerobic growth–arrested cells (Kitade et al. 2018).

Aldehydes derived from various mono- and dihydroxybenzoates serve as flavors, fragrances or as pharmaceutical precursors with vanillin being a prominent example for such compounds (Fig. 1) (Kunjapur and Prather 2015). However, the production of aromatic aldehydes is challenging due to their rapid reduction to the corresponding alcohols. To address this challenge, a comprehensive screening of 27 candidate proteins for aromatic aldehyde reductase activity was conducted in a C. glutamicum strain engineered for the production of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (4HBAL) (Kim et al. 2022). This screening identified the gene NCgl0324 to encode an enzyme with the undesired reductase activity. Deletion of the corresponding gene led to the accumulation of 1.36 g L−1 4HBAL. Further experiments demonstrated that this deletion also enhanced the synthesis of protocatechuate aldehyde (PCAL) and vanillin (VAN, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde) in shake flask cultures. Deletion of the very same gene also proved crucial for developing a process for the biotransformation of vanilliate (VNA) into VAN (Matsuzawa et al. 2024). In this context, a screening of 17 carboxylic acid reductase (CAR) candidate proteins identified three enzymes capable of reducing of up to 21 g L−1 VNA to VAN in jar fermenters.

CHO not only serves as a precursor for the three aromatic amino acids and various mono- and dihydroxylated benzoates and their derivatives, but also for PABA mentioned before. PABA is an intermediate in endogenous folate synthesis and an important building block for commercial drugs and azo dyes (Kluczyk et al. 2012). For PABA production in C. glutamicum R, three heterologous genes encoding 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate synthase components I and II (ADS, encoded by pabAB from Corynebacterium callunae) and 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate lyase (ADL, encoded by pabC from Xenorhabdus bovienii) were episomally expressed (Fig. 2) (Kubota et al. 2016). However, PABA accumulation was accompanied by a glycation byproduct, likely formed through non-enzymatic reaction of PABA’s primary amino group with glucose’s aldehyde group. Acidification effectively decomposed this byproduct back into PABA and glucose. The best strain yielded up to 43 g L−1 PAPA in fed-batch fermentations. PABA can be further hydroxylated to 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzoate (4 AHB), a building block for polybenzoxazole polymers—high-performance materials with exceptional mechanical strength and thermal stability (Fig. 2) (Hong et al. 2003). Nonaka and colleagues built on the strain engineered for PABA production and screened six 4-hydroxybenzoate-3-hydroxylases (4HBH) for their ability to hydroxylate PABA (Nonaka et al. 2023). CvPHBH from Caulobacter vibrioides emerged as the most promising candidate and was further adapted for applications in C. glutamicum through protein engineering. In fed-batch fermentations using complex medium with glucose as carbon and energy source, the best variant accumulated up to 13.5 g L−1 4 AHB.

Methylanthranilate (MANT) is widely used to impart a grape scent and flavor in food and cosmetics industries, but is currently produced via petroleum-based processes. To develop a more sustainable alternative, Luo and colleagues modified their previously engineered TRP-auxotrophic C. glutamicum strain for ANT production by introducing a gene encoding anthranilic acid methyltransferase (ANTM) from Zea mays (Fig. 2) (Luo et al. 2019). During O-methylation of ANT, this enzyme consumes S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) as methyl donor prompting further strain engineering to enhance intracellular SAM availability. This was achieved by recycling S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SAH), the demethylation product of SAM through episomal overexpression of the endogenous gene encoding the SAH hydrolase. In biphasic fed-batch cultures using a defined medium containing glucose and TRP, the best variant enabled the production of 5.74 g L−1 MANT.

Indole (IND), the direct precursor of TRP, is a key signaling molecule in bacteria and plants and is also prized in the food and fragrance industries for its jasmine-like aroma (Ferrer et al. 2023). Additionally, halogenated and oxygenated IND derivatives can serve as colorants, and hold promise for therapeutic applications in treating human diseases. In nature, IND is synthesized either from indole-3-glycerol phosphate (IGP), an intermediate in the TRP biosynthesis pathway, or from TRP via bacterial tryptophanases (TNs) (Fig. 2). Both metabolic options were implemented in C. glutamicum, enabling the microbial production of this aromatic heterocycle: In 2022, Ferrer and colleagues leveraged the IGP lyase activity of the α-subunit of the endogenous bifunctional tryptophan synthase (TS) to produce IND in strains supplying IGP (Fig. 2) (Ferrer et al. 2022). In the context of this study, plant-derived “stand-alone” enzymes possessing only the IGP lyase activity were screened for potential application in C. glutamicum. Among six plant-derived enzymes tested, the IGP lyase from common wheat (Triticum aestivum) exhibited a performance comparable to that of the endogenous TS α-subunit. Increased IND production was achieved by deleting the csm gene, which rendered the resulting variant auxotrophic for TYR and PHE, while rerouting the metabolic flux in the direction of ANT. However, other modifications were required to enable higher IND titers. These modifications included the deletion of the trpL leader peptide gene and the expression of a TRP-insensitive ANS variant-encoding gene from E. coli. Ultimately, with application of in situ product recovery (ISPR), using tributyrin as a second phase, the best strains produced up to 0.67 g L−1 IND. In the same year, the same group established IND production from supplemented TRP in whole-cell biotransformations using a C. glutamicum strain with heterologous expression of the TN gene from the gamma-proteobacterium Providencia rettgeri (Mindt et al. 2022). The highest IND production was achieved with a strain co-expressing the native aromatic amino acid permease gene aroP to enhance TRP uptake. Product toxicity was mitigated through ISPR, utilizing dibutyl sebacate as second organic phase. The approach enabled complete TRP conversion with an IND product titer of 5.7 g L−1. One year later, the concept of TN-based IND production was expanded to allow de novo indole production from glucose, eliminating the need for TRP supplementation (Mindt et al. 2023). Initially, the csm gene was deleted in an existing SA-accumulating C. glutamicum starting strain to increase CHO availability, although this rendered the strain auxotrophic for PHE and TYR. Upon introduction of plasmids for the heterologous expression of the ANS encoding gene from E. coli (Ferrer et al. 2022) TRP accumulation was observed. Combined with other genetic modifications and ISPR using tributyrin, a final IND titer of 1.38 g L−1 was achieved. Notably, decoupling biomass production from IND production by aerobic cultivating growth-arrested cells without PHE- and TYR-supplementation drastically increased volumetric activity, achieving similar IND titers in much shorter timeframes.

C. glutamicum has also been engineered to synthesize various TRP-derivatives (e.g., halogenated derivatives) with diverse chemical and pharmacological applications. However, since a comprehensive review on this topic has been published recently, these compounds will not be discussed further here (Xiao et al. 2023).

Another compound with many applications in the cosmetic and food industries is 2-phenylethanol (2PE), an aromatic alcohol with a rose-like smell, which can be synthesized from the PHE-precursor phenylpyruvate (PPA) (Fig. 2) (Zhu et al. 2023). To achieve this, a heterologous Ehrlich pathway, facilitating the decarboxylation and reduction of PPA, was functionally integrated into an evolved PHE-producing C. glutamicum strain. For the Ehrlich pathway two genes—aro10, encoding 2-ketoisovalerate decarboxylase (KID) from S. cerevisiae, and yahK encoding alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) originating from E. coli—were heterologously expressed. With additional modifications, the best variant produced up to 3.23 g L−1 2PE from glucose in shake flask cultivations. When equipped with the isomerase pathway for xylose assimilation and a xylose transporter gene from E. coli, the C. glutamicum strain produced up to 3.55 g L−1 2PE using xylose as sole carbon and energy source. The same strain accumulated 3.28 g L−1 2PE from stalk hydrolysate as second-generation feedstock.

The Ehrlich pathway can also be utilized in a C. glutamicum variant engineered for TYR-production to synthesize tyrosol (TYO) and its glycosylated derivative, salidroside (SAL) (Fig. 2). SAL was first identified in raspberry extracts during a screening for bioactive compounds with potential therapeutic effects against Huntington’s disease (Kallscheuer et al. 2019b). To enable microbial SAL production from TYR, the Ehrlich pathway was reconstructed in C. glutamicum. Before decarboxylation and reduction to TYO, deamination of TYR to hydroxyphenylpyruvate (HPPY) was required, a step which was potentially catalyzed by the endogenous transaminases (ATs) AroT and/or IlvE (Marienhagen et al. 2005). However, even with TYR supplementation, only 0.15 mg L−1 SAL could be produced in shake flask cultivations. A more successful approach involved the direct supplementation of TYO, followed by its glycosylation using a UDP-dependent glycosyltransferase (UDPG) from Oryza sativa. Under these biotransformative production conditions, SAL production reached 9.7 g L−1. More recently, Junker and coworkers also followed the idea to introduce the Ehrlich pathway into C. glutamicum to produce TYO from TYR (Junker et al. 2025). The best strain variant allowed for a product titer of 1.3 g L−1 TYO, also relying on endogenous transaminases to catalyze the conversion of TYR to HPPY prior to decarboxylation and reduction to TYO.

β-arbutin (ARB), can also be found in plants such as pears, cranberries, and bearberry. ARB is a hydroquinone glucoside with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and anticancer properties (Saeedi et al. 2021). The initial step of ARB synthesis from CHO was established in C. glutamicum by introducing the previously mentioned CHPL UbiC, which facilitates the conversion of CHO to 4HB (Fig. 1) (Zhang et al. 2024). Heterologous expression of a gene encoding 4-hydroxybenzoate-1-hydroxylase (4HB1H), identified in Candida parapsilosis CBS604 enabled the reductive decarboxylation of 4HB to hydroquinone (HQ). HQ was then glycosylated by an UDP-dependent hydroquinone glycosyltransferase (HQG) derived from Rauvolfia serpentin, ultimately yielding ARB. Since these genes were introduced into a C. glutamicum variant lacking CM- or ANS-activities due to deletions of csm and trpE, a complex medium was required to enable the production of 7.94 g L−1 ARB in shake flasks.

However, TYR is not only an intermediate of TYO- and SAL-biosynthesis, but also a direct precursor of various other aromatic compounds of biotechnological interest. Tyramine (TYRA), the decarboxylation product of TYR has garnered attention as starting material for the production of high-performance thermoplastics, pharmaceutically relevant compounds and hydrogels (Fig. 2) (Schulz et al. 2019; Chen et al. 2023). Heterologous expression of a tyrosine decarboxylase (TYD) gene from Levilactobacillus brevis enabled the production of up to 1.6 g L−1 TYRA from glucose in a C. glutamicum strain engineered for TYR production during shake flask cultivations (Poethe et al. 2024). Under the same conditions, introduction of the isomerase pathway into the best strain also facilitated TYRA production from xylose (1.2 g L−1). Batch fermentations with glucose or xylose in bioreactors allowed for faster growth and product formation but resulted in lower final TYRA titers (1 g L−1 TYRA for both carbon sources). The decarboxylation of TYR to TYRA also offers the possibility to produce TYO from TYRA via oxidative deamination in a single step (Junker et al. 2025) (Fig. 2). To achieve this, a gene for a tyramine oxidase (TO) from Kocuria rhizophila was introduced into a strain expressing a gene encoding a TYD. This strain accumulated up to 1.87 g L−1 TYRA. In co-cultivations of two C. glutamicum variants either expressing a gene for a TO or a TYD, the TYO titer was increased to 1.95 g L−1 TYO.

The hydroxylation of the aromatic ring of TYR by tyrosinase (TYRO) in the presence of oxygen yields 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-l-alanine (DOPA), the most commonly used treatment of Parkinson’s disease (Fig. 2) (Chávez-Béjar et al. 2012). Heterologous expression of a TYRO-encoding gene from Ralstonia solanacearum in wild-type C. glutamicum cells enabled the production of 0.26 g L−1 DOPA from 1 g L−1 TYR when using glucose and xylose as carbon sources (Kurpejović et al. 2021). In these experiments, optimal concentrations of 0.4 mM copper sulfate—essential for TYRO activity as a copper-containing enzyme—and 0.2 mM thymol to prevent undesired DOPA oxidation were determined for cultivations. Additionally, whole-cells pre-grown on glucose and producing TYRO were used for biotransformations of TYR to DOPA in distilled water without any buffering agent. Under these conditions, up to 0.4 g L−1 DOPA was produced in the presence of 0.4 mM ascorbic acid to prevent any undesired DOPA oxidation.

The non-oxidative deamination of TYR by tyrosine ammonia-lyases (TALs) yields para-coumarate (CA, or 4-hydroxycinnamate), a phenylpropanoid believed to possess several bioactive properties, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, or anti-inflammatory effects (Fig. 2) (Zhu et al. 2024). Heterologous expression of a TAL-encoding gene from Flavobacterium johnsoniae enabled the conversion of endogenously provided TYR to CA in the previously discussed C. glutamicum DelAro5 variant unable to catabolize aromatics (Mutz et al. 2023). The accumulation of ANT as a major byproduct was eliminated by reducing ANS activity through targeted mutagenesis, thereby circumventing TRP auxotrophy. Subsequently, PHE biosynthesis was reduced by replacing the ATG start codon of pheA, the PDH-encoding gene by the less preferred GTG, and PEP availability was improved to further increase CA accumulation (Fig. 2). As a result, a maximum titer of 0.7 g L−1 CA was achieved in defined medium.

(Poly)phenols and aromatic polyketides

In plants, CA and other phenylpropanoids such as cinnamate, caffeate, or ferulate serve as precursors for more complex (poly)phenols such as flavonoids and stilbenoids (Fig. 3) (Marienhagen and Bott 2013). These compounds can also be classified as polyketides since their synthesis involves polyketide synthases (PKSs). Several thousand different (poly)phenols have been identified and can be categorized into chemically distinct groups, including stilbenoids, flavonoids, and phenylbutanoids—many of which have potential applications in preventing or treating cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegenerative disorders (Milke et al. 2018). However, plants usually contain complex mixtures of chemically similar polyphenolic compounds, making it challenging to isolate individual compounds in large quantities. In contrast, integrating biosynthetic pathways for plant polyphenols into microorganisms enables the production of individual polyphenols as chemically distinct compounds. This approach allows for large-scale synthesis and easier isolation. In recent years, C. glutamicum has been engineered to produce various biotechnologically and pharmaceutically relevant plant (poly)phenols.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic overview of the heterologous pathways leading to different plant polyketides, which have been functionally implemented into C. glutamicum. Precursors, co-substrates, intermediates and products (For the sake of consistency, all carboxyl groups are depicted in their protonated state): AKG, α-ketoglutarate; SUC, succinate; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine. Enzymes (genes): 4CL (4cl), 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (e.g., Petroselinum crispum); BAR (curA), benzalacetone reductase (E. coli); BAS (bas), benzalacetone synthase (Rheum palmatum); CHI (chi), chalcone isomerase (Petunia × hybrida); CHS (chs), chalcone synthase (Petunia × hybrida); F3H (f3h), flavanone-3-hydroxylase (Petunia × hybrida); FLS (fls), flavonol synthase (Populus deltoides); ROMT (omt), resveratrol-di-O-methyltransferase (Vitis vinifera); STS (sts), stilbene synthase (Arachis hypogaea)

The first significant step in engineering C. glutamicum for polyphenol production was achieved in 2016 with the construction of a platform strain featuring the deletion of four gene clusters comprising 21 genes involved in the catabolism of aromatic compounds (Kallscheuer et al. 2016b). Among these were four genes of the phd gene cluster discovered shortly before, which plays a crucial role in the degradation of phenylpropanoids via a CoA-dependent β-oxidative deacetylation pathway (Kallscheuer et al. 2016a). To facilitate polyphenol biosynthesis, codon-optimized, plant-derived genes were heterologously expressed in this C. glutamicum variant. These included a 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL) from parsley (Petroselinum crispum), responsible for the CoA activation of supplemented phenylpropanoids, and a stilbene synthase (STS) from peanut (Arachis hypogaea), a type III PKS. STSs catalyze the sequential condensation of three malonyl-CoA units with the CoA-activated phenylpropanoid, followed by cyclization (van Summeren-Wesenhagen and Marienhagen 2013). This engineered pathway enabled the production of pinosylvin, resveratrol (RES), and piceatannol from supplemented cinnamate, CA, and caffeate, respectively (Fig. 3) (Kallscheuer et al. 2016b). Unlike most other bacteria, C. glutamicum possesses a type I fatty acid synthase, which is a eukarotic-type multienzyme, into which all activities required for fatty acid elongation are integrated (Schweizer and Hofmann 2004). The addition of 25 µM cerulenin, a fatty acid synthase inhibitor that selectively binds to the β-keto-acyl-ACP synthase subunit, thus blocking the interaction with malonyl-CoA, increases intracellular malonyl-CoA availability by shutting down de novo fatty acid biosynthesis. This enhanced stilbenoid production, yielding up to 0.16 g L−1 RES. Functional implementation of genes encoding chalcone synthase (CHS, Petunia × hybrida) and chalcone isomerase (CHI, Petunia × hybrida) in the same strain background enabled the biosynthesis of up to 0.04 g L−1 of the (2S)-flavanones naringenin (NAR) and eriodictyol (ERI) from supplemented CA and caffeate, respectively. Other attempts to produce ERI from TYR in C. glutamicum involved the supplementation of malonate as source for malonyl-CoA (Wu et al. 2022). To facilitate this, matC and matB from Rhizobium trifolii, encoding a malonate transporter and a malonyl-CoA synthetase, respectively, were introduced into C. glutamicum. The resulting strain, also expressing genes for a 4CL from P. crispum, a CHS from Petunia × hybrida and a CHI from Medicago sativa accumulated 0.02 g L−1 NAR in complex medium containing 20 g L−1 glucose, 2 g L−1 malonate, and 0.5 g L−1 TYR. Subsequently, the hpaBC genes from E. coli encoding 4-hydroxyphenylacetate-3-hydroxylase were expressed in C. glutamicum to convert NAR to ERI. Under the same cultivation conditions, up to 0.01 g L−1 ERI was produced. Kallscheuer and colleagues made also initial steps towards polyphenol production from glucose by integrating DAHPS from E. coli to enhance carbon flux into the shikimate pathway (Kallscheuer et al. 2016b). Along with the already mentioned TAL from F. johnsoniae to facilitate the conversion of endogenous TYR to CA up to 0.06 g L−1 RES could be obtained with the resulting strain in shake flask cultivations and in the presence of 25 µM cerulenin. Subsequently, the polyphenol portfolio accessible via C. glutamicum was expanded by decorating stilbenoid and flavonoid core structures by O-methylation or hydroxylation providing access to more stable compounds of higher commercial interest (Kallscheuer et al. 2017b). Heterologous expression of a gene for an O-methyltransferase (ROMT) from Vitis vinifera in a RES-producing C. glutamicum strain allowed for the synthesis of trace amounts of mono-O-methylated pinostilbene and 0.04 g L−1 di-O-methylated pterostilbene from supplemented CA (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the expression of heterologous genes encoding 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases in (2S)-flavanone-producing C. glutamicum strains enabled the production of flavanonols and flavonols starting from the phenylpropanoids CA and caffeate (Fig. 3) (Kallscheuer et al. 2017b). The targeted flavonols kaempferol and quercetin were produced with maximum titers of 0.02 g L−1 and 0.01 g L−1, respectively. Notably, efforts were made to produce polyphenols independently from the shikimate pathway (Kallscheuer et al. 2017c). To achieve this, a synthetic pathway utilizing inexpensive supplemented benzoic acids, such as 4HB, was introduced into C. glutamicum. This metabolic strategy mimics a reversed β-oxidative phenylpropanoid degradation pathway, eliminating the need for ammonia lyase activity (Kallscheuer et al. 2017a). Using this approach, RES titers of 0.005 g L−1 RES were achieved from 5 mM 4HB.

Hitherto, most of these experiments were conducted with the costly supplementation of cerulenin to increase the malonyl-CoA pool, as availability of this two-carbon donor molecule represents the key bottleneck in microbial polyphenol synthesis (Milke and Marienhagen 2020). Consequently, subsequent metabolic engineering efforts focused on enhancing malonyl-CoA availability independent of exogenous fatty acid inhibitors. Initial experiments demonstrated that the sole overexpression of endogenous accBCD1 genes encoding the native acetyl‐CoA carboxylase was insufficient to enhance polyphenol production in C. glutamicum (Milke et al. 2019a). As an alternative, intracellular acetyl‐CoA availability was increased by reducing the flux into the TCA cycle through reduction of citrate synthase activity by promoter replacement of gltA coding for this enzyme. In defined medium, these strains accumulated 0.02 g L−1 NAR or 0.11 g L−1 RES from glucose without supplementation of phenylpropanoid precursors or cerulenin. In this study, the fasR gene was deleted. FasR encodes a transcriptional repressor, which negatively regulates the expression of accBCD1 and of the genes for two fatty acid synthases (fasIA and fasIB). However, the inactivation of fasR led to a severe growth defect, likely due to deregulated fatty acid synthesis consuming cellular resources (Milke et al. 2019a). To address this issue, only the FasR-binding operator sequences upstream of the accBCD1 open reading frames were mutated, while maintaining the natural FasR-mediated regulation of fasIA and fasIB (Milke et al. 2019b). In combination with other modifications, the resulting strain exhibited a significantly increased intracellular malonyl-CoA pool, as confirmed by intracellular LC–MS/MS measurements and enhanced product formation. Notably, the resulting C. glutamicum variant named M-CoA, equipped with a plasmid enabling RES production from supplemented CA, could be successfully applied in co-cultivation with the aforementioned CA-producing C. glutamicum variant, yielding 0.03 g L−1 RES from glucose (Mutz et al. 2024).

Subsequently, C. glutamicum M-CoA was successfully employed for the microbial production of flavoring phenylbutanoids (Milke et al. 2020). One such compound, 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)butan-2-one—commonly known as raspberry ketone—is responsible for the typical scent and flavor of raspberries (Guo et al. 2021). The chemical synthesis of nature-identical raspberry ketone is well established, as this compound is widely used in the flavoring of food, beverages, and perfumes. However, the combination of high demand for natural raspberry ketone and its low natural abundance in raspberries makes it expensive natural flavoring components. C. glutamicum was engineered for raspberry ketone synthesis from supplemented CA by combining the already mentioned 4CL from P. crispum with the benzalacetone synthase (BAS) from Chinese rhubarb (Rheum palmatum) yielding p-hydroxybenzalacetone (Fig. 3) (Milke et al. 2020). For its subsequent reduction to raspberry ketone, the NADPH-dependent curcumin/dihydrocurcumin reductase CurA from E. coli was employed as it provides a hitherto unknown benzalacetone reductase (BAR) activity. The engineered strain accumulated up to 0.1 g L−1 raspberry ketone. Additionally, supplementing ferulate or cinnamate instead of CA enabled the biosynthesis of two other naturally occurring flavor compounds, zingerone (0.07 g L−1) and benzylacetone (0.01 g L−1), via the same pathway (Fig. 3).

In 2018, Zha et al. demonstrated that C. glutamicum can convert the supplemented flavonoid catechin to the anthocyanin cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (Zha et al. 2018). To achieve this, genes encoding anthocyanidin synthase (ANS) from Petunia × hybrida and flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (3GT) from Arabidopsis thaliana were co-expressed in C. glutamicum. ANS, a 2-oxoglutarate- and iron-dependent oxygenase, catalyzes catechin oxidation to cyanidin, while the 3GT facilitates cyanidin glycosylation, yielding the more stable cyanidin 3-O-glucoside (Fig. 4A). Further process optimization and enhanced UDP-glucose availability enabled the production of 0.04 g L−1 cyanidin 3-O-glucoside from 0.5 g L−1 catechin in complex medium.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Schematic overview of the enzymatic steps leading to other aromatic compounds accessible by C. glutamicum: A cyaniding-3-O-glycoside, B the type I polyketide noreugenin, the type III polyketides C 6-methylsalicylate and D germicidin C, and E the non-shikimate pathway-derived aromatic compound 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate. 2-amino-4,5-dihydroxy-6-one-heptanoate-7-phosphate is the probable product of the aldolase GriI, but it has not been independently characterized. Precursors, co-substrates, intermediates and products (for the sake of consistency, all carboxyl groups are depicted in their protonated state): ACP, acyl carrier protein; AKG, α-ketoglutarate; SUC, succinate; UDP, uracil-diphosphate; UDP-glucose, uracil-diphosphate glucose. Enzymes (genes): 3,4AHS (griH), 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate synthase (Streptomyces griseus); 3GT (3gt), flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (Arabidopsis thaliana); 6MSS (chlB1), 6-methylsalicylic acid synthase (Streptomyces antibioticus); ALD (griH), aldolase (Streptomyces griseus); ANS (ans), anthocyanidin synthase (Petunia hybrida); GCS (gcs), germicidin synthase (Streptomyces coelicolor); PCS (pcs), pentaketide chromone synthase (Aloe arborescens)

During several fed-batch fermentations in bioreactors for plant polyphenol production, it became evident that maintaining product stability at elevated oxygen concentrations poses a significant challenge (Braga et al. 2018). In this context, ISPR, particularly through a biphasic extractive strategy, offers a promising approach to protect polyphenol products from oxidative degradation (Tharmasothirajan et al. 2021). Additionally, ISPR serves as an effective method to mitigate cytotoxic effects associated with high product concentrations while enhancing overall process performance. A solvent screening identified tributyrin as the most biocompatible solvent for C. glutamicum, making it the preferred choice for biphasic extraction due to its favorable partitioning and solubility properties for RES (Tharmasothirajan et al. 2021). In bioreactor studies, biphasic cultivation with tributyrin enabled a RES titer of 1.71 g L−1, with approximately 64% of the stilbenoid successfully recovered from the tributyrin phase at an elevated pH of 12.

Other aromatic compounds of biotechnological interest

All aromatic products described thus far are derived from intermediates or CHO as end product of the shikimate pathway, or the biosynthetic routes leading to the three aromatic amino acids. However, PKSs are not only relevant for polyphenol synthesis from phenylpropanoids as previously discussed, but can also be employed to directly synthesize aromatic compounds from acetyl-CoA, malonyl-CoA and other activated aliphatic precursors.

The first example is the chromone noreugenin, a pharmacologically relevant plant pentaketide synthesized from malonyl-CoA by medicinal plant plants such as Aloe arborescens (Abe et al. 2005). To establish noreugenin biosynthesis in C. glutamicum, the above-mentioned malonyl-CoA providing variant C. glutamicum M-CoA was used as a chassis (Milke et al. 2019b). For product synthesis, only a single gene from A. aborescens, encoding pentaketide chromone synthase (PCS), needed to be heterologously expressed. This type III PKS catalyzes the iterative decarboxylation and condensation of five malonyl-CoA molecules yielding noreugenin (Fig. 4B). Initially, only the accumulation of the C1/C6 cyclized intermediate 1-(2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-butane-1,3-dione was detected. However, acidification of the culture broth post-cultivation enabled full cyclization, resulting in the accumulation of 0.05 g L−1 of the bicyclic end product, noreugenin.

C. glutamicum M-CoA was also the strain of choice for establishing 6-methylsalicylic acid (6MSA) synthesis (Kallscheuer et al. 2019a). This chemically simple aromatic compound is a building block in the biosynthesis of several antibiotics, including pactamycin and polyketomycin (Daum et al. 2009; Ito et al. 2009). Establishing microbial 6MSA synthesis in C. glutamicum marked the first instance of introducing a large multi-domain type I PKS in this host. Specifically, the 6MSA synthase (6MSS) ChlB1 from Streptomyces antibioticus—a 5.3 kbp-gene encoding a 186 kDa protein—catalyzes the conversion of acetyl-CoA and three molecules of malonyl-CoA into 6MSA in consecutive steps (Fig. 4C). Initial challenges related to protein folding were overcome by translation fusion of ChlB1 to the C-terminus of the maltose-binding protein MalE from E. coli, which supported proper expression. Interestingly, the 6MSS exhibited activity even in the absence of a heterologous dedicated 4′-phosphopantetheinyl transferase (PPTase), typically required for post-translational activation of type I PKSs. This unexpected finding led to the discovery that the endogenous PPTase PptA of C. glutamicum can also activate ChlB1Sa. The best-performing strain accumulated up to 0.04 g L−1 6MSA within 48 h of cultivation. Further experiments revealed that PptA can also activate non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, positioning C. glutamicum as a promising microbial platform for the production of other fine chemicals and medicinal drugs (Kallscheuer et al. 2019a).

Germicidins, a class of 2-pyrones from the sponge-associated Streptomyces sp., exhibit both, aromatic and aliphatic characteristics, and possess significant, specific inhibitory activity against human hexokinase, an abundant enzyme in cancer cells (Bai et al. 2021). Zhan and colleagues established germicidin C-synthesis in C. glutamicum by introducing germicidin synthase (GCS), a type III PKS from Streptomyces coelicolor (Zhan et al. 2023). GCS catalyzes the condensation of 3-oxo-4(S)-methyl-hexanoyl-ACP and methylmalonyl-CoA to produce germicidin (Fig. 4D). However, the accumulation of propionyl-CoA and methylmalonyl-CoA leads to growth inhibition, but introduction of GCS as methylmalonyl-CoA-dependent PKS can relieve this inhibitory effect. To further enhance germicidin production, ALE was employed, leveraging the fitness advantage conferred by polyketide biosynthesis in the presence of propionate. This approach led to an improved germicidin titer of 0.01 g L−1.

In addition to PKSs, other enzymes also enable access to aromatic compounds independently of the shikimate pathway. The only example in C. glutamicum thus far is the production of the bioplastic precursor 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate (3,4-AHBA). This compound, an intermediate of grixazone biosynthesis in Streptomyces griseus, is synthesized directly from l-aspartate-4-semialdehyde and dihydroxyacetone phosphate via the activities of two enzymes: GriI and GriH (Fig. 4E) (Suzuki et al. 2006). GriI catalyzes an aldol condensation between l-aspartate-4-semialdehyde and dihydroxyacetone phosphate, and GriH converts the resulting C7 metabolite into 3,4-AHBA. A C. glutamicum l-lysine producing strain, heterologously expressing S. griseus griI and griH successfully produced 1 g L−1 3,4-AHBA from sweet sorghum juice (Kawaguchi et al. 2015). Interestingly, production titers from sweet sorghum juice rich in amino acids were fivefold higher than from pure sucrose. Supplementation experiments suggested that l-leucine specifically enhanced 3,4-AHBA production, likely by increasing pyruvate availability for l-aspartate-4-semialdehyde biosynthesis. A subsequent study showed that 3,4-AHBA production improved under low dissolved oxygen conditions (Kawaguchi et al. 2021). Comparative metabolic profiling at different oxygen levels revealed accumulation of different organic acids including TCA-cycle intermediates and lactate. An engineered strain lacking lactate dehydrogenase activity accumulated up to 5.6 g L−1 3,4-AHBA in glucose fed-batch cultures, likely due to enhanced pyruvate availability.

Conclusions and challenges

The portfolio of aromatic chemicals, which can be produced from renewable resources through microbial fermentation has significantly expanded in recent years, and C. glutamicum, already well known in the industry as an amino acid producer, has been developed to a versatile platform organism for the production of these valuable compounds.

In particular, the presented C. glutamicum chassis strains providing aromatic precursor molecules derived from the shikimate pathway or CoA-activated thioesters such as malonyl-CoA represent excellent hosts for the functional implementation of biosynthetic gene clusters from various different sources. Very recently, C. glutamicum M-CoA, mentioned several times in this review, was used to express genes encoding six selected type III PKSs of unknown function from different planctomycetes to screen for novel activities (Milke et al. 2024). In these experiments, several enzymes involved in the synthesis of long-chain alkylresorcinols—compounds with potential functions as antibiotics or electron carriers—were identified.

Further improvements of C. glutamicum–based cell factories for aromatics are necessary to enhance the cost-competitiveness of biotechnologically produced aromatic chemicals compared to conventional petroleum-derived compounds. A key focus should be on suitable metabolic engineering strategies. Many examples presented in this review rely heavily on the genetically induced auxotrophies for one or more aromatic amino acids, to reroute the carbon flux and maximize product titers (Table 1). However, depending on the targeted product, such strain designs would be economically unfeasible for large-scale industrial bioprocesses, as they would require costly supplementation of essential compounds. Similarly, the choice of the cultivation medium plays a crucial role—it should be as simple as possible and should fit to subsequent downstream processing strategies. The use of complex medium components such as peptone, tryptone or yeast extract, which were included in some studies reviewed here, is unlikely to be viable in scaled-up bioprocesses (Table 1). Notably, avoiding auxotrophies and utilizing defined media without complex additives would also improve the comparability (and likely also the reproducibility) of scientific studies on the production of small aromatic compounds with C. glutamicum.

Table 1.

Overview of aromatic compounds accessible with Corynebacterium glutamicum

Aromatic compound Cultivation mediuma Type of cultivation Titer [g L−1] Cultivation time [h] Reference
Shikimate pathway intermediates and aromatic amino acids
Shikimate Complex medium; suc, 38 Batch, shake flask 7.4 96 Zhang et al. 2015
Shikimate Complex medium; suc Fed-batch, bioreactor 11.3 70 Zhang et al. 2015
Shikimate Defined medium; glu Fed-batch, bioreactor, growth-arrested cells 141 48 Kogure et al. 2016
Shikimate Defined medium; glu, xyl, ara Fed-batch, bioreactor, growth-arrested cells 137 48 Kogure et al. 2016
Shikimate Complex medium; Glu, 50; l-phe, 0.1; l-trp; 0.1; l-tyr 0.1 Batch, unspecified vessel 13.1 72 Sato et al. 2020
Shikimate Complex medium; cel, 50; l-phe, 0.1; l-trp; 0.1; l-tyr 0.1 Batch, unspecified vessel 13.8 72 Sato et al. 2020
Anthranilate Defined CGXII-medium; glu; l-trp supplementation Fed-batch, bioreactor 26.4 84 Luo et al. 2019
Anthranilate Defined CGXII-medium; glu; xyl Fed-batch, bioreactor 5.9 192 Mutz et al. 2024
l-Phenylalanine Complex medium; glu Fed-batch, bioreactor 15.8 80 Zhang et al. 2015
l-Phenylalanine Complex medium; glu, 80 Batch, shake flask 6.11 72 Tachikawa et al. 2024
l-Tryptophan Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; l-phe, 0.25; l-tyr, 0.25 Batch, shake flask 2.14 48 Mindt et al. 2023
l-Tyrosine Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; l-tyr, 0.5 mM Batch, shake flask 3.2 48 Kurpejović et al. 2023
l-Tyrosine Defined CGXII medium; glu, 10; xyl, 30; l-tyr, 0.5 mM Batch, shake flask 3.6 48 Kurpejović et al. 2023
Shikimate pathway-derived compounds
Protocatechuate Complex medium; glu Fed-batch, bioreactor 1.14 120 Okai et al. 2016
Protocatechuate Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 2 72 Kallscheuer and Marienhagen 2018
Protocatechuate Defined BT medium, glu Fed-batch, bioreactor, growth-arrested cells 82.7 32 Kogure et al. 2021
Protocatechuate Defined CGXII medium, xyl, 40 Batch, shake flask 9.6 100 Labib et al. 2021
Protocatechuate Defined CGXII medium, glu Fed-batch, bioreactor 16.5 130 Labib et al. 2021
2-hydroxybenzoate (salicylic acid) Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 0.01 72 Kallscheuer and Marienhagen 2018
3-hydroxybenzoate Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 0.3 72 Kallscheuer and Marienhagen 2018
4-hydroxybenzoate Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 3.3 72 Kallscheuer and Marienhagen 2018
4-hydroxybenzoate Complex medium; glu; l-phe, 0.9; l-trp, 0.7; l-tyr, 0.8 Fed-batch, bioreactor 19 65 Purwanto et al., 2018
4-hydroxybenzoate Defined medium; glu Fed-batch, bioreactor, growth-arrested cells 36,6 24 Kitade et al. 2018
4-hydroxybenzaldehyde Complex medium; glu, 80 Batch, shake flask 1.36 48 Kim et al. 2022
Protocatechuate aldehyde Complex medium; glu, 80 Batch, shake flask 1.18 48 Kim et al. 2022
Vanillin Complex medium; glu, 80; l-met, 0.5 Batch, shake flask 0.31 48 Kim et al. 2022
Vanillin Complex medium; glu, 85.7; vanillic acid, 42.9 Biotransformation of vanillic acid, jar reactor 21 45 Matsuzawa et al. 2024
4-aminobenzoate Complex medium; glu Fed-batch, bioreactor 43.1 48 Kubota et al. 2016
4-amino-3-hydroxybenzoate Complex medium; glu Fed-batch, bioreactor 13.5 72 Nonaka et al. 2023
Methylanthranilate Defined CGXII-medium; glu; l-trp supplementation Fed-batch, bioreactor 5.74 84 Luo et al. 2019
Indole Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; l-phe, 0.25; l-trp, 0.25; Batch, shake flask 0.67 48 Ferrer et al. 2022
l-tyr, 0.25; in situ product removal with tributyrin, 20% (vol/vol)
Indole Defined CGXII medium; glu, 10; l-trp, 10 Biotransformation of l-trp, bioreactor 5.7 24 Mindt et al. 2022
In situ product removal with dibutyl sebacate, 20% (vol/vol)
Indole Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; l-phe, 0.25; l-tyr, 0.25; Batch, shake flask 1.38 70 Mindt et al. 2023
In situ product removal with tributyrin, 20% (vol/vol)
2-phenylethanol Complex medium; glu, 60 Batch, shake flask 3.23 50 Zhu et al. 2023
2-phenylethanol Complex medium; xyl, 60 Batch, shake flask 3.55 60 Zhu et al. 2023
2-phenylethanol Complex medium; corn stalk hydrolysate (glu, 41; xyl, 19) Batch, shake flask 3.28 48 Zhu et al. 2023
Tyrosol Defined medium; glu; l-phe, 0.5 mM Batch, shake flask 1.3 160 Junker et al. 2025
Tyrosol Defined medium; glu; l-phe, 0.5 mM Batch, shake flask 1.87 160 Junker et al. 2025
Tyrosol Defined medium; glu; l-phe, 0.5 mM Batch, shake flask 1.95 160 Junker et al. 2025
Salidroside Defined CGXII medium; l-tyr, 20 mM Batch, shake flask 0.15 72 Kallscheuer et al. 2019b
Salidroside Defined CGXII medium; tyrosol, 40 mM Biotransformation of tyrosol, shake flask 9.7 100 Kallscheuer et al. 2019b
β-arbutin Complex medium, glu 80, insufficient information on media supplements Batch, shake flask 7.94 72 Zhang et al. 2024
Tyramine Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; l-phe, 0.5 mM Batch, shake flask 1.6 72 Poethe et al. 2024
Tyramine Defined CGXII medium; xyl, 40; l-phe, 0.5 mM Batch, shake flask 1.2 72 Poethe et al. 2024
Tyramine Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; l-phe, 1 mM; l-trp, 1 mM Batch, bioreactor 1 36 Poethe et al. 2024
Tyramine Defined CGXII medium; xyl, 40; l-phe, 1 mM; l-trp, 1 mM Batch, bioreactor 1 72 Poethe et al. 2024
3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-l-alanine (l-DOPA) Defined CGXII medium; glu, 10; xyl, 3; l-tyr, 1 Batch, shake flask 0.36 72 Kurpejović et al. 2021
3,4-dihydroxyphenyl-l-alanine (l-DOPA) Water; l-tyr, 1 Biotransformation, 15-ml test tubes 0.4 48 Kurpejović et al. 2021
p-coumarate Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 0.66 72 Mutz et al. 2024
Aromatic polyketides
Resveratrol Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; p-ca, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.16 72 Kallscheuer et al. 2016b
Resveratrol Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; cer, 0.025 mM Batch, shake flask 0.06 72 Kallscheuer et al. 2016b
Resveratrol Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 0.11 72 Milke et al. 2019a
Resveratrol Defined CGXII medium; glu; p-ca, 5 mM Fed-batch, bioreactor 1.71 72 Tharmasothirajan et al. 2021
In situ product removal with tributyrin, 10% (vol/vol)
Resveratrol Defined CGXII medium; glu; 40; co-cultivation of Batch, shake flask 0.03 72 Mutz et al. 2024
p-ca and resveratrol prod. C. glutamicum variants
Pinostilbene Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; p-ca, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.01 144 Kallscheuer et al. 2017b
Pterostilbene Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; p-ca, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.04 144 Kallscheuer et al. 2017b
Pinosylvin Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; cinnamate, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of cinnamate, shake flask 0.12 72 Kallscheuer et al. 2016b
Piceatannol Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; caffeate, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of caffeate, shake flask 0.06 72 Kallscheuer et al. 2016b
Naringenin Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; p-ca, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.04 72 Kallscheuer et al. 2016b
Naringenin Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 0.02 72 Milke et al. 2019a
Naringenin Complex medium; glu, 20; l-tyr, 0.5; malonate, 2 Batch, shake flask 0.01 72 Wu et al. 2022
Dihydrokaempferol Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; p-ca, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.02 144 Kallscheuer et al. 2017b
Kaempferol Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; p-ca, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.02 144 Kallscheuer et al. 2017b
Eriodictyol Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; caffeate, 5 mM; Biotransformation of caffeate, shake flask 0.04 72 Kallscheuer et al. 2016b
Eriodictyol Complex medium; glu, 20; l-tyr, 0.5; malonate, 2 Batch, shake flask 0.01 72 Wu et al. 2022
Dihydroquerecetin Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; caffeate, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.01 144 Kallscheuer et al. 2017b
Quercetin Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; caffeate, 5 mM; cer, 0.025 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.01 144 Kallscheuer et al. 2017b
Raspberry ketone Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; p-ca, 5 mM Biotransformation of p-coumarate, shake flask 0.1 72 Milke et al. 2020
Zingerone Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; ferulate, 5 mM Biotransformation of ferulate, shake flask 0.07 72 Milke et al. 2020
Benzylacetone Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40; cinnamate, 5 mM Biotransformation of caffeate, shake flask 0.01 72 Milke et al. 2020
Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside Complex medium; glu, 20; catechine 0.5 Biotransformation of catechin, shake flask 0.04 48 Zha et al. 2018
Other non-shikimate pathway-derived aromatic compounds or polyketides
Noreugenin Complex medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 0.05 72 Milke et al. 2019b
6-methylsalicylic acid Defined CGXII medium; glu, 40 Batch, shake flask 0.04 48 Kallscheuer et al. 2019a
Germicidin C Defined CGXII medium, propionate Incomplete information 0.01 80 Zhan et al. 2023
3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate Complex medium; sweet sorghum juice (suc, 40; glu, fru) Batch, shake flask 1 72 Kawaguchi et al. 2015
3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate Defined CGXII medium; glu Fed-batch, bioreactor 5.6 122 Kawaguchi et al. 2021

aA medium is considered to be “complex” when complex medium components such as yeast extract, peptone, or tryptone are added, or fed-batch cultivations only the carbon and energy source is indicated, not the amount of substrate added. All concentrations are given in g L−1 if not stated otherwise. Carbon sources used for C. glutamicum cultivations: ara, arabinose; cel, cellubiose; fru, fructose; glu, glucose; rib, ribose; suc, sucrose; xyl, xylose; p-ca, p-coumarate; cer, cerulenin

However, the development of suitable production strains for aromatic compounds requires accelerated strain construction and the characterization of numerous variants. To achieve this, biofoundries—advanced facilities that integrate automation, molecular biology, and computational tools—are essential for streamlining these processes. In such a setting, high-throughput technologies for tasks ranging from cell factory construction to cultivation and analytics, combined with machine learning to optimize the design-build-test-learn cycle, would unlock the full potential of C. glutamicum. Initial steps in this direction have already been taken (Kang et al. 2022; Rosch et al. 2024).

Last but not least, unconventional solutions are needed to address challenges such as substrate uptake, product export, or product toxicity. For instance, at higher product concentrations, most aromatic compounds are cytotoxic, negatively affecting cell integrity and transport processes, even in the case of such a robust host as C. glutamicum. Recently, a screening of free fatty acid supplements identified palmitelaidic acid and linoleic acid as cost-effective and suitable additives to mitigate cytotoxic effects of stilbenoid- and flavonoid production in C. glutamicum (Tharmasothirajan et al. 2023). These free fatty acids are not metabolized, but remain in the cell envelope, counteracting membrane damage by aromatic product accumulation. This strategy ultimately enabled up to a threefold increase in polyphenol titers in bioreactor cultivations. Given its cost-effectiveness, this approach could be a promising option for large-scale production of other membrane-active aromatic compounds of industrial value using C. glutamicum.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Nicolai Kallscheuer and Dr. Stephan Noack are acknowledged for carefully reading the manuscript.

Author contribution

JM performed the literature search and data analysis, and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. JM acknowledges funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (grant number 031B1134 A) as part of the innovation lab “AutoBioTech” within the project “Modellregion, BioRevierPLUS: BioökonomieREVIER Innovationscluster Biotechnologie & Kunststofftechnik.” and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no 638718.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Abe I, Utsumi Y, Oguro S, Morita H, Sano Y, Noguchi H (2005) A plant type III polyketide synthase that produces pentaketide chromone. J Am Chem Soc 127:1362–1363. 10.1021/ja0431206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Averesch NJH, Krömer JO (2018) Metabolic engineering of the shikimate pathway for production of aromatics and derived compounds-present and future strain construction strategies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 6. 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Bai Y, Yi P, Zhang Y, Hu J, Wang Y, Ju J, Pan H (2021) Structure-based molecular networking for the target discovery of novel germicidin derivatives from the sponge-associated Streptomyces sp. 18A01. J Antibiot 74:799–806. 10.1038/s41429-021-00447-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bang HB, Choi IH, Jang JH, Jeong KJ (2021) Engineering of Escherichia coli for the economic production L-phenylalanine in large-scale bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 26:468–475. 10.1007/S12257-020-0313-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Braga A, Oliveira J, Silva R, Ferreira P, Rocha I, Kallscheuer N, Marienhagen J, Faria N (2018) Impact of the cultivation strategy on resveratrol production from glucose in engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol 265:70–75. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chávez-Béjar MI, Báez-Viveros JL, Martínez A, Bolívar F, Gosset G (2012) Biotechnological production of L-tyrosine and derived compounds. Process Biochem 47:1017–1026. 10.1016/J.PROCBIO.2012.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen M, He X, Lv J, xiao H, Tan W, Wang Y, Hu J, Zeng K, Yang G (2023) A new bio-based thermosetting with amorphous state, sub-zero softening point and high curing efficiency. Polymer 264:125518. 10.1016/J.POLYMER.2022.125518
  8. Cho JS, Luo ZW, Moon CW, Prabowo CPS, Lee SY (2024) Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of pyrone and pyridine dicarboxylic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121:e2415213121. 10.1073/PNAS.2415213121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Daum M, Peintner I, Linnenbrink A, Frerich A, Weber M, Paululat T, Bechthold A (2009) Organisation of the biosynthetic gene cluster and tailoring enzymes in the biosynthesis of the tetracyclic quinone glycoside antibiotic polyketomycin. ChemBioChem 10:1073–1083. 10.1002/CBIC.200800823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. del Olmo A, Calzada J, Nuñez M (2017) Benzoic acid and its derivatives as naturally occurring compounds in foods and as additives: uses, exposure, and controversy. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57:3084–3103. 10.1080/10408398.2015.1087964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dickey RM, Forti AM, Kunjapur AM (2021) Advances in engineering microbial biosynthesis of aromatic compounds and related compounds. Bioresour Bioprocess 8. 10.1186/s40643-021-00434-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Ferrer L, Mindt M, Suarez-Diez M, Jilg T, Zagorščak M, Lee JH, Gruden K, Wendisch VF, Cankar K (2022) Fermentative indole production via bacterial tryptophan synthase alpha subunit and plant indole-3-glycerol phosphate lyase enzymes. J Agric Food Chem 70:5634–5645. 10.1021/ACS.JAFC.2C01042/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferrer L, Mindt M, Wendisch VF, Cankar K (2023) Indoles and the advances in their biotechnological production for industrial applications. Syst Microbiol Biomanufacturing 4:511–527. 10.1007/S43393-023-00223-X [Google Scholar]
  14. Flachbart LK, Gertzen CGW, Gohlke H, Marienhagen J (2021) Development of a biosensor platform for phenolic compounds using a transition ligand strategy. ACS Synth Biol 10:2002–2014. 10.1021/ACSSYNBIO.1C00165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gong Z, Chen J, Jiao X, Gong H, Pan D, Liu L, Zhang Y, Tan T (2024) Genome-scale metabolic network models for industrial microorganisms metabolic engineering: current advances and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 72:108319. 10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2024.108319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guo H, Chang S, Jia L, Wang Z, Zhang Q, Zhang G (2021) Advances in the synthesis and applications of raspberry ketone: a review. Flavour Fragr J 36:615–625. 10.1002/FFJ.3678 [Google Scholar]
  17. Herrmann KM, Weaver LM (1999) The shikimate pathway. Annu Rev Plant Biol 50:473–503. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hong CS, Jikei M, Kakimoto MA (2003) Synthesis and characteristics of hyperbranched polybenzoxazoles via poly(o-hydroxyamide) precursors. Polym J 35:859–867. 10.1295/polymj.35.859 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ikeda M (2006) Towards bacterial strains overproducing L-tryptophan and other aromatics by metabolic engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:615–626. 10.1007/S00253-005-0252-Y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ito T, Roongsawang N, Shirasaka N, Lu W, Flatt PM, Kasanah N, Miranda C, Mahmud T (2009) Deciphering pactamycin biosynthesis and engineered production of new pactamycin analogues. ChemBioChem 10:2253–2265. 10.1002/CBIC.200900339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jackson RJ, Cooper KL, Tappenden P, Rees A, Simpson EL, Read RC, Nicholson KG (2011) Oseltamivir, zanamivir and amantadine in the prevention of influenza: a systematic review. J Infect 62:14–25. 10.1016/J.JINF.2010.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang M, Zhang H (2016) Engineering the shikimate pathway for biosynthesis of molecules with pharmaceutical activities in E. coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol 42:1–6. 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang Y, Qian F, Yang J, Liu Y, Dong F, Xu C, Sun B, Chen B, Xu X, Li Y, Wang R, Yang S (2017) CRISPR-Cpf1 assisted genome editing of Corynebacterium glutamicum. 10.1038/ncomms15179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Junker N, Poethe SS, Wendisch VF (2025) Two routes for tyrosol production by metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod 18:43. 10.1186/S13068-025-02641-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kallscheuer N, Kage H, Milke L, Nett M, Marienhagen J (2019a) Microbial synthesis of the type I polyketide 6-methylsalicylate with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:9619–9631. 10.1007/S00253-019-10121-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kallscheuer N, Marienhagen J (2018) Corynebacterium glutamicum as platform for the production of hydroxybenzoic acids. Microb Cell Fact 17:70. 10.1186/s12934-018-0923-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kallscheuer N, Menezes R, Foito A, Da Silva MH, Braga A, Dekker W, Sevillano DM, Rosado-Ramos R, Jardim C, Oliveira J, Ferreira P, Rocha I, Silva AR, Sousa M, Allwood JW, Bott M, Faria N, Stewart D, Ottens M, Naesby M, Dos Santos CN, Marienhagen J (2019b) Identification and microbial production of the raspberry phenol salidroside that is active against huntington’s disease. Plant Physiol 179:969–985. 10.1104/pp.18.01074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kallscheuer N, Polen T, Bott M, Marienhagen J (2017a) Reversal of β-oxidative pathways for the microbial production of chemicals and polymer building blocks. Metab Eng 42:33–42. 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Bott M, Marienhagen J (2017b) Functional expression of plant-derived O-methyltransferase, flavanone 3-hydroxylase, and flavonol synthase in Corynebacterium glutamicum for production of pterostilbene, kaempferol, and quercetin. J Biotechnol 258:190–196. 10.1016/J.JBIOTEC.2017.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Kappelmann J, Krumbach K, Noack S, Bott M, Marienhagen J (2016a) Identification of the phd gene cluster responsible for phenylpropanoid utilization in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:1871–1881. 10.1007/s00253-015-7165-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Marienhagen J (2017c) A novel synthetic pathway enables microbial production of polyphenols independent from the endogenous aromatic amino acid metabolism. ACS Synth Biol 6:410–415. 10.1021/ACSSYNBIO.6B00291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Stenzel A, Gätgens J, Bott M, Marienhagen J (2016b) Construction of a Corynebacterium glutamicum platform strain for the production of stilbenes and (2S)-flavanones. Metab Eng 38:47–55. 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kang DH, Ko SC, Heo YB, Lee HJ, Woo HM (2022) RoboMoClo: a robotics-assisted modular cloning framework for multiple gene assembly in biofoundry. ACS Synth Biol 11:1336–1348. 10.1021/ACSSYNBIO.1C00628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kawaguchi H, Hasunuma T, Ohnishi Y, Sazuka T, Kondo A, Ogino C (2021) Enhanced production of γ-amino acid 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoic acid by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum under oxygen limitation. Microb Cell Fact 20:228. 10.1186/S12934-021-01714-Z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kawaguchi H, Sasaki K, Uematsu K, Tsuge Y, Teramura H, Okai N, Nakamura-Tsuruta S, Katsuyama Y, Sugai Y, Ohnishi Y, Hirano K, Sazuka T, Ogino C, Kondo A (2015) 3-Amino-4-hydroxybenzoic acid production from sweet sorghum juice by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum. Bioresour Technol 198:410–417. 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2015.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim HS, Choi JA, Kim BY, Ferrer L, Choi JM, Wendisch VF, Lee JH (2022) Engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum as the platform for the production of aromatic aldehydes. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10. 10.3389/FBIOE.2022.880277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  37. Kinoshita S, Udaka S, Shimono M (1957) Studies on the amino acid fermentation Part I. Production of L-glutamic acid by various microorganisms. J Gen Appl Microbiol 3:193–205. 10.2323/jgam.3.193 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kitade Y, Hashimoto R, Suda M, Hiraga K, Inui M (2018) Production of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid by an aerobic growth-arrested bioprocess using metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e02587-e2617. 10.1128/AEM.02587-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kluczyk A, Popek T, Kiyota T, de Macedo P, Stefanowicz P, Lazar C, Konishi Y (2012) Drug evolution: p-aminobenzoic acid as a building block. Curr Med Chem 9:1871–1892. 10.2174/0929867023368872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kogure T, Inui M (2018) Recent advances in metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for bioproduction of value-added aromatic chemicals and natural products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:8685–8705. 10.1007/s00253-018-9289-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kogure T, Kubota T, Suda M, Hiraga K, Inui M (2016) Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for shikimate overproduction by growth-arrested cell reaction. Metab Eng 38:204–216. 10.1016/J.YMBEN.2016.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kogure T, Suda M, Hiraga K, Inui M (2021) Protocatechuate overproduction by Corynebacterium glutamicum via simultaneous engineering of native and heterologous biosynthetic pathways. Metab Eng 65:232–242. 10.1016/J.YMBEN.2020.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Krömer JO, Nunez-Bernal D, Averesch NJH, Hampe J, Varela J, Varela C (2013) Production of aromatics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae-a feasibility study. J Biotechnol 163:184–193. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kubota T, Watanabe A, Suda M, Kogure T, Hiraga K, Inui M (2016) Production of para-aminobenzoate by genetically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum and non-biological formation of an N-glucosyl byproduct. Orig Res Artic. 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kuepper J, Otto M, Dickler J, Behnken S, Magnus J, Jäger G, Blank LM, Wierckx N (2020) Adaptive laboratory evolution of Pseudomonas putida and Corynebacterium glutamicum to enhance anthranilate tolerance. Microbiol 166:1025–1037. 10.1099/MIC.0.000982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kunjapur AM, Prather KLJ (2015) Microbial engineering for aldehyde synthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1892–1901. 10.1128/AEM.03319-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kurpejović E, Burgardt A, Bastem GM, Junker N, Wendisch VF, Sariyar Akbulut B (2023) Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for L-tyrosine production from glucose and xylose. J Biotechnol 363:8–16. 10.1016/J.JBIOTEC.2022.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kurpejović E, Wendisch VF, Sariyar Akbulut B (2021) Tyrosinase-based production of L-DOPA by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:9103–9111. 10.1007/S00253-021-11681-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Labib M, Görtz J, Brüsseler C, Kallscheuer N, Gätgens J, Jupke A, Marienhagen J, Noack S (2021) Metabolic and process engineering for microbial production of protocatechuate with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol Bioeng 118:4414–4427. 10.1002/BIT.27909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu Q, Liu Y, Chen Y, Nielsen J (2020) Current state of aromatics production using yeast: achievements and challenges. Curr Opin Biotechnol 65:65–74. 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Luo ZW, Cho JS, Lee SY (2019) Microbial production of methyl anthranilate, a grape flavor compound. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 166:10749–10756. 10.1073/PNAS.1903875116/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lütke-Eversloh T, Santos CNS, Stephanopoulos G (2007) Perspectives of biotechnological production of L-tyrosine and its applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:751–762. 10.1007/S00253-007-1243-Y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Marchand CH, Salmeron C, Raad RB, Méniche X, Chami M, Masi M, Blanot D, Daffé M, Tropis M, Huc E, Le MP, Decottignies P, Bayan N (2012) Biochemical disclosure of the mycolate outer membrane of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol 194:587–597. 10.1128/JB.06138-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Marienhagen J, Bott M (2013) Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for the synthesis of plant natural products. J Biotechnol 163:166–178. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Marienhagen J, Kennerknecht N, Sahm H, Eggeling L (2005) Functional analysis of all aminotransferase proteins inferred from the genome sequence of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol 187:7639–7646. 10.1128/JB.187.22.7639-7646.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Matsuzawa M, Ito J, Danjo K, Fukui K (2024) Vanillin production by Corynebacterium glutamicum using heterologous aromatic carboxylic acid reductases. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod 17:58. 10.1186/S13068-024-02507-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Milke L, Aschenbrenner J, Marienhagen J, Kallscheuer N (2018) Production of plant-derived polyphenols in microorganisms: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:1575–1585. 10.1007/S00253-018-8747-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Milke L, Ferreira P, Kallscheuer N, Braga A, Vogt M, Kappelmann J, Oliveira J, Silva AR, Rocha I, Bott M, Noack S, Faria N, Marienhagen J (2019a) Modulation of the central carbon metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum improves malonyl-CoA availability and increases plant polyphenol synthesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 116:1380–1391. 10.1002/BIT.26939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Milke L, Kabuu M, Zschoche R, Gätgens J, Krumbach K, Carlstedt KL, Wurzbacher CE, Balluff S, Beemelmanns C, Jogler C, Marienhagen J, Kallscheuer N (2024) A type III polyketide synthase cluster in the phylum Planctomycetota is involved in alkylresorcinol biosynthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 108:239. 10.1007/S00253-024-13065-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Milke L, Kallscheuer N, Kappelmann J, Marienhagen J (2019b) Tailoring Corynebacterium glutamicum towards increased malonyl-CoA availability for efficient synthesis of the plant pentaketide noreugenin. Microb Cell Fact 18:71. 10.1186/s12934-019-1117-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Milke L, Marienhagen J (2020) Engineering intracellular malonyl-CoA availability in microbial hosts and its impact on polyketide and fatty acid synthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:6057–6065. 10.1007/S00253-020-10643-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Milke L, Mutz M, Marienhagen J (2020) Synthesis of the character impact compound raspberry ketone and additional flavoring phenylbutanoids of biotechnological interest with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact 19:92. 10.1186/S12934-020-01351-Y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Mindt M, Beyraghdar Kashkooli A, Suarez-Diez M, Ferrer L, Jilg T, Bosch D, Martins dos Santos V, Wendisch VF, Cankar K (2022) Production of indole by Corynebacterium glutamicum microbial cell factories for flavor and fragrance applications. Microb Cell Fact 21:45. 10.1186/S12934-022-01771-Y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Mindt M, Ferrer L, Bosch D, Cankar K, Wendisch VF (2023) De novo tryptophanase-based indole production by metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 107:1621. 10.1007/S00253-023-12397-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Mutz M, Brüning V, Brüsseler C, Müller MF, Noack S, Marienhagen J (2024) Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of anthranilate from glucose and xylose. Microb Biotechnol 17:e14388. 10.1111/1751-7915.14388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mutz M, Kösters D, Wynands B, Wierckx N, Marienhagen J (2023) Microbial synthesis of the plant natural product precursor p-coumaric acid with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact 22:209. 10.1186/S12934-023-02222-Y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Nekhaev AI, Maksimov AL (2021) Production of aromatic hydrocarbons from biomass. Pet Chem 61:15–34. 10.1134/S0965544121010023 [Google Scholar]
  68. Nešvera J, Pátek M (2011) Tools for genetic manipulations in Corynebacterium glutamicum and their applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1641–1654. 10.1007/s00253-011-3272-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Nielsen J, Tillegreen CB, Petranovic D (2022) Innovation trends in industrial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 40:1160–1172. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Noda S, Kondo A (2017) Recent advances in microbial production of aromatic chemicals and derivatives. Trends Biotechnol 35:785–796. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nonaka K, Osamura T, Takahashi F (2023) A 4-hydroxybenzoate 3-hydroxylase mutant enables 4-amino-3-hydroxybenzoic acid production from glucose in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact 22:168. 10.1186/S12934-023-02179-Y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Okai N, Miyoshi T, Takeshima Y, Kuwahara H, Ogino C, Kondo A (2016) Production of protocatechuic acid by Corynebacterium glutamicum expressing chorismate-pyruvate lyase from Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:135–145. 10.1007/S00253-015-6976-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Parise MTD, Parise D, Kato RB, Pauling JK, Tauch A (2020) Azevedo VA de C, Baumbach J (2020) CoryneRegNet 7, the reference database and analysis platform for corynebacterial gene regulatory networks. Sci Data 71(7):1–9. 10.1038/s41597-020-0484-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Poethe SS, Junker N, Meyer F, Wendisch VF (2024) Sustainable production of the drug precursor tyramine by engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 108:499. 10.1007/s00253-024-13319-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rosch TM, Tenhaef J, Stoltmann T, Redeker T, Kösters D, Hollmann N, Krumbach K, Wiechert W, Bott M, Matamouros S, Marienhagen J, Noack S (2024) AutoBioTech─a versatile biofoundry for automated strain engineering. ACS Synth Biol 13:2227–2237. 10.1021/ACSSYNBIO.4C00298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Saeedi M, Khezri K, Seyed Zakaryaei A, Mohammadamini H (2021) A comprehensive review of the therapeutic potential of α-arbutin. Phyther Res 35:4136–4154. 10.1002/ptr.7076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sato N, Kishida M, Nakano M, Hirata Y, Tanaka T (2020) Metabolic engineering of shikimic acid-producing Corynebacterium glutamicum from glucose and cellobiose retaining its phosphotransferase system function and pyruvate kinase activities. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8. 10.3389/FBIOE.2020.569406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  78. Schulz A, Gepp MM, Stracke F, von Briesen H, Neubauer JC, Zimmermann H (2019) Tyramine-conjugated alginate hydrogels as a platform for bioactive scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 107:114–121. 10.1002/JBM.A.36538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Schweizer E, Hofmann J (2004) Microbial type I fatty acid synthases (FAS): major players in a network of cellular FAS systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:501. 10.1128/MMBR.68.3.501-517.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Shende VV, Bauman KD, Moore BS (2024) The shikimate pathway: gateway to metabolic diversity. Nat Prod Rep 41:604–648. 10.1039/d3np00037k [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Song J, He Y, Luo C, Feng B, Ran F, Xu H, Ci Z, Xu R, Han L, Zhang D (2020) New progress in the pharmacology of protocatechuic acid: a compound ingested in daily foods and herbs frequently and heavily. Pharmacol Res 161:105109. 10.1016/J.PHRS.2020.105109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Suzuki H, Ohnishi Y, Furusho Y, Sakuda S, Horinouchi S (2006) Novel benzene ring biosynthesis from C3 and C4 primary metabolites by two enzymes. J Biol Chem 281:36944–36951. 10.1074/JBC.M608103200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Syukur Purwanto H, Kang MS, Ferrer L, Han SS, Lee JY, Kim HS, Lee JH (2018) Rational engineering of the shikimate and related pathways in Corynebacterium glutamicum for 4-hydroxybenzoate production. J Biotechnol 282:92–100. 10.1016/J.JBIOTEC.2018.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Tachikawa Y, Okuno M, Itoh T, Hirasawa T (2024) Metabolic engineering with adaptive laboratory evolution for phenylalanine production by Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biosci Bioeng 137:344–353. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2024.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tharmasothirajan A, Melcr J, Linney J, Gensch T, Krumbach K, Ernst KM, Brasnett C, Poggi P, Pitt AR, Goddard AD, Chatgilialoglu A, Marrink SJ, Marienhagen J (2023) Membrane manipulation by free fatty acids improves microbial plant polyphenol synthesis. Nat Commun 14:5619. 10.1038/S41467-023-40947-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tharmasothirajan A, Wellfonder M, Marienhagen J (2021) Microbial polyphenol production in a biphasic process. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:17266–17275. 10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.1C05865 [Google Scholar]
  87. van Summeren-Wesenhagen PV, Marienhagen J (2013) Putting bugs to the blush: metabolic engineering for phenylpropanoid-derived products in microorganisms. Bioengineered 4(6):355–362. 10.4161/bioe.23885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wiklund P, Bergman J (2006) The chemistry of anthranilic acid. Curr Org Synth 3:379–402. 10.2174/157017906777934926 [Google Scholar]
  89. Wolf S, Becker J, Tsuge Y, Kawaguchi H, Kondo A, Marienhagen J, Bott M, Wendisch VF, Wittmann C (2021) Advances in metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum to produce high-value active ingredients for food, feed, human health, and well-being. Essays Biochem 65:197–212. 10.1042/EBC20200134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wu X, Liu J, Liu D, Yuwen M, Koffas MAG, Zha J (2022) Biosynthesis of eriodictyol from tyrosine by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact 21:86. 10.1186/S12934-022-01815-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Xiao S, Wang Z, Wang B, Hou B, Cheng J, Bai T, Zhang Y, Wang W, Yan L, Zhang J (2023) Expanding the application of tryptophan: industrial biomanufacturing of tryptophan derivatives. Front Microbiol 14. 10.3389/FMICB.2023.1099098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  92. Yildiz G, Ronsse F, Van DR, Prins W (2016) Challenges in the design and operation of processes for catalytic fast pyrolysis of woody biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:1596–1610. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.202 [Google Scholar]
  93. Zha J, Zang Y, Mattozzi M, Plassmeier J, Gupta M, Wu X, Clarkson S, Koffas MAG (2018) Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for anthocyanin production. Microb Cell Fact 17:143. 10.1186/S12934-018-0990-Z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zha J, Zhao Z, Xiao Z, Eng T, Mukhopadhyay A, Koffas MA, Tang YJ (2023) Biosystem design of Corynebacterium glutamicum for bioproduction. Curr Opin Biotechnol 79:102870. 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhan C, Lee N, Lan G, Dan Q, Cowan A, Wang Z, Baidoo EEK, Kakumanu R, Luckie B, Kuo RC, McCauley J, Liu Y, Valencia L, Haushalter RW, Keasling JD (2023) Improved polyketide production in C. glutamicum by preventing propionate-induced growth inhibition. Nat Metab 57 5:1127–1140. 10.1038/s42255-023-00830-x [DOI] [PubMed]
  96. Zhang B, Gou K, Xu K, Li Z, Guo X, Wu X (2024) De novo biosynthesis of β-arbutin in Corynebacterium glutamicum via pathway engineering and process optimization. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod 17:88. 10.1186/S13068-024-02540-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhang C, Zhang J, Kang Z, Du G, Chen J (2015) Rational engineering of multiple module pathways for the production of L-phenylalanine in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42:787–797. 10.1007/S10295-015-1593-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhu N, Xia W, Wang G, Song Y, Gao X, Liang J, Wang Y (2023) Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for de novo production of 2-phenylethanol from lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod 16:75. 10.1186/S13068-023-02327-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhu Z, Chen R, Zhang L (2024) Simple phenylpropanoids: recent advances in biological activities, biosynthetic pathways, and microbial production. Nat Prod Rep 41:6–24. 10.1039/D3NP00012E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES