Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1972 Mar;70(3):475–490. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.3.475

Selection in Finite Populations with Multiple Alleles. III. Genetic Divergence with Centripetal Selection and Mutation

B D H Latter 1
PMCID: PMC1212750  PMID: 5024717

Abstract

Natural selection for an intermediate level of gene or enzyme activity has been shown to lead to a high frequency of heterotic polymorphisms in populations subject to mutation and random genetic drift. The model assumes a symmetrical spectrum of mutational variation, with the majority of variants having only minor effects on the probability of survival. Each mutational event produces a variant which is novel to the population. Allelic effects are assumed to be additive on the scale of enzyme activity, heterosis arising whenever a heterozygote has a mean level of activity closer to optimal than that of other genotypes in the population.—A new measure of genetic divergence between populations is proposed, which is readily interpreted genetically, and increases approximately linearly with time under centripetal selection, drift and mutation. The parameter is closely related to the rate of accumulation of mutational changes in a cistron over an evolutionary time span.—A survey of published data concerning polymorphic loci in man and Drosophila suggests than an alternative model, based on the superiority of hybrid molecules, is not of general importance. Thirteen loci giving rise to hybrid zones on electrophoresis have a mean heterozygote frequency of 0.22 ±.06, compared with a value of 0.23 ±.04 for 16 loci classified as producing no hybrid enzyme.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (960.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gillespie J. H., Kojima K. The degree of polymorphisms in enzymes involved in energy production compared to that in nonspecific enzymes in two Drosophila ananassae populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):582–585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KIMURA M., CROW J. F. THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Koehn R. K. Esterase heterogeneity: dynamics of a polymorphism. Science. 1969 Feb 28;163(3870):943–944. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3870.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koehn R. K., Rasmussen D. I. Polymorphic and monomorphic serum esterase heterogeneity in catostomid fish populations. Biochem Genet. 1967 Sep;1(2):131–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00486514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES