Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1973 Jan;73(1):125–134. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.1.125

Genotype-Temperature Interaction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. II. Body Weight

Antonio Fontdevila 1
PMCID: PMC1212874  PMID: 4631598

Abstract

The effect of genotype-temperature interactions on body weight has been studied in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster using four isogenic strains derived from it, and their hybrid F1 and F2 progenies. Measurements were made at four constant temperatures—25°, 21°, 17° and 13°C—and at a temperature oscillating between 17° and 25°C.—Low, though significant, genotype-temperature interaction exists among the isogenic strains, but not among the F1 nor F2 hybrid progenies. These low interaction values may be due to the fact that all isogenic strains have a common origin and therefore presumably little genic divergence exists among them. F1 and F2 hybrid progenies generally exhibit higher homeostasis than the isogenic strains, although one isogenic line has better homeostasis than the majority of the hybrids.—There is no evidence of heterosis and some evidence of dominance. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that body weight is regulated mainly by additive genetic factors and is subject to stabilizing selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (536.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dobzhansky T., Wallace B. The Genetics of Homeostasis in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1953 Mar;39(3):162–171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.39.3.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fontdevila A. Genotype-temperature interaction in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Viability. Genetica. 1970;41(2):257–264. doi: 10.1007/BF00958910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frahm R. R., Kojima K. I. Comparison of selection responses on body weight under divergent larval density conditions in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):625–637. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HULL P., GOWE R. S. The importance of interactions detected between genotype and environmental factors for characters of economic significance in poultry. Genetics. 1962 Feb;47:143–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.2.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. JINKS J. L., MATHER K. Stability in development of heterozygotes and homozygotes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1955 May 17;143(913):561–578. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1955.0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kearsey M. J., Kojima K. I. The genetic architecture of body weight and egg hatchability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1967 May;56(1):23–37. doi: 10.1093/genetics/56.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES