Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1973 Jan;73(1):87–108. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.1.87

Recombination and DNA Replication in the DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Oocyte

Rhoda F Grell 1
PMCID: PMC1212884  PMID: 4631603

Abstract

A method is described that permits the recovery of a well-synchronized population of oocytes. Utilizing this pupal system, the heat-responsive period for increasing crossing-over in the Drosophila genome has been defined for the X chromosome and a portion of chromosome 2. The response is initiated close to the time of oocyte formation (premeiotic interphase) and is terminated after ∼36 hr. During the 36-hr period different regions show characteristic responses, which vary in degree, in duration, and in initiation and termination points, so as to generate the beginning of a thermal recombination map for the Drosophila genome. Centromere regions exhibit the greatest increases in crossing-over for their respective chromosomes but are distinctly asynchronous in time; interstitial regions respond the least. Correlated autoradiographic studies have localized DNA replication in the oocyte to a ∼24-hr period, which also begins close to oocyte formation (premeiotic interphase); late labeling in restricted regions, undetectable with the present method, could extend the period, as could prolonged synthesis in the oocyte. The results demonstrate that DNA replication and the heat-sensitive period for enhancement of crossing-over are coincident processes over most and possibly all of their length.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Comings D. E., Okada T. A. Mechanism of chromosome pairing during meiosis. Nature. 1970 Aug 1;227(5257):451–456. doi: 10.1038/227451a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crone M., Levy E., Peters H. The duration of the premeiotic DNA synthesis in mouse oocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Sep;39(2):678–688. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90071-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Erickson R. J., Braun W. Apparent dependence of transformation on the stage of deoxyribonucleic acid replication of recipient cells. Bacteriol Rev. 1968 Dec;32(4 Pt 1):291–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grell R. F. The Meiotic Origin of Temperature-Induced Crossovers in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Females. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):411–421. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KING R. C., RUBINSON A. C., SMITH R. F. Oogenesis in adult Drosophila melanogaster. Growth. 1956 Jun;20(2):121–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koch E. A., Smith P. A., King R. C. The division and differentiation of Drosophila cystocytes. J Morphol. 1967 Jan;121(1):55–70. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051210106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maguire M. P. Evidence on the stage of heat induced crossover effect in maize. Genetics. 1968 Oct;60(2):353–362. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES