Abstract
Correlated responses to selection for postweaning gain in mice were studied to determine the influence of population size and selection intensity. Correlated traits measured were three-, six- and eight-week body weights, litter size, twelve-day litter weight, proportion infertile matings and two indexes of reproductive performance. In general, the results agreed with observations made on direct response: correlated responses in the body weight traits and litter size increased as (1) selection intensity increased and (2) effective population size increased. Correlated responses in the body weight traits and litter size were positive in the large population size lines (16 pairs), as expected from the positive genetic correlation between these traits and postweaning gain. However, several negative correlated responses were observed at small population sizes (one and two pairs). Within each level of selection intensity, traits generally associated with fitness tended to decline most in the very small populations (one and two pairs) and in the large populations (16 pairs) for apparently different reasons. The fitness decline at the small effective population sizes was attributable to inbreeding depression. In contrast, it was postulated that the fitness decline at the large effective population size was due to selection moving the population mean for body weight and a trait positively correlated genetically with body weight (i.e., percent body fat) away from an optimum.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (835.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Frankham R., Jones L. P., Barker J. S. The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. I. Short-term response to selection. Genet Res. 1968 Dec;12(3):237–248. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300011848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JAMES J. W. Conflict between directional and centripetal selection. Heredity (Edinb) 1962 Nov;17:487–499. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1962.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macarthur J. W. Selection for Small and Large Body Size in the House Mouse. Genetics. 1949 Mar;34(2):194–209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/34.2.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RAHNEFELD G. W., BOYLAN W. J., COMSTOCK R. E., SINGH M. MASS SELECTION FOR POST-WEANING GROWTH IN MICE. Genetics. 1963 Nov;48:1567–1583. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.11.1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahnefeld G. W., Comstock R. E., Singh M., Napuket S. R. Genetic Correlation between Growth Rate and Litter Size in Mice. Genetics. 1966 Dec;54(6):1423–1429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.6.1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson R. H., Kojima K., Lucas H. L. An analysis of short-term selection experiments. Heredity (Edinb) 1968 Nov;23(4):493–506. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1968.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts R. C. The limits to artificial selection for body weight in the mouse. II. The genetic nature of the limits. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):361–375. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300010211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson D. W., Bradford G. E. Cellular response to selection for rapid growth in mice. Growth. 1969 Sep;33(3):221–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TANTAWY A. O. Selection for long and short wing length in Drosophila melanogaster with different systems of mating. Genetica. 1956;28(3-4):231–262. doi: 10.1007/BF01694322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Timon V. M., Eisen E. J. Comparisons of ad libitum and restricted feeding of mice selected and unselected for postweaning gain. I. Growth, feed consumption and feed efficiency. Genetics. 1970 Jan;64(1):41–57. doi: 10.1093/genetics/64.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]