Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1974 Feb;76(2):339–366. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.339

The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xi. Genetic Variability in a Local Population

Terumi Mukai 1, Osamu Yamaguchi 1
PMCID: PMC1213070  PMID: 4207116

Abstract

Six hundred and ninety-one second chromosomes were extracted from a Raleigh, North Carolina population, and the following experimental results were obtained: (1) Salivary gland chromosomes of all lines were observed and the number of inversion-carrying chromosomes was 130, among which 76 carried In(2R)NS, 36 carried In(2L)t, 4 carried In(2L)t and In(2R)NS, and 14 carried different kinds of rare inversions. (2) Viabilities of homozygotes and heterozygotes were examined. The frequency of lethal-carrying chromosomes was 275/691 (or 0.398):70/130 (or 0.538) in inversion-carrying chromosomes and 205/561 (or 0.365) in inversion-free chromosomes. The former is significantly higher than the latter. The average homozygote viability was 0.4342 including lethal lines and 0.7163 excluding those, the average heterozygote viability being 1.0000. The detrimental load to lethal load ratio (D:L ratio) was 0.334/0.501 = 0.67. The average viability of lethal heterozygotes was less than that of lethal-free heterozygotes, significantly in inversion-free individuals but not significantly so in inversion-carrying individuals. Inversion heterozygotes seem to have slightly better viability than the inversion-free heterozygotes on the average, but not significantly so. (3) The average degree of dominance of viability polygenes was estimated to be 0.293 ± 0.071 for all heterozygotes whose component chromosomes had better viabilities than 0.6 of the average heterozygote viability, 0.177 ± 0.077 for inversion-free heterozygotes and 0.489 ± 0.082 for inversion heterozygotes. (4) Mutation rates of viability polygenes and lethal genes were estimated on the basis of genetic loads and average degrees of dominance of lethal genes and viability polygenes. Estimates were very close to those obtained by direct estimation. (5) Possible overdominance and epistasis were detected, but the magnitude must be very small. (6) The effective size of the population was estimated to be much greater than 10,000 by using the allelism rate of lethal-carrying chromosomes (0.0040) and their frequency.—On the basis of these findings and the comparison with the predicted result (Mukai and Maruyama 1971), the mechanisms of the maintenance of genetic variability in the population are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Krimbas C B. Comparison of the Concealed Variability in Drosophila Willistoni with That in Drosophila Prosaltans. Genetics. 1959 Nov;44(6):1359–1369. doi: 10.1093/genetics/44.6.1359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mukai T., Chigusa S. I., Mettler L. E., Crow J. F. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335–355. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mukai T, Burdick A B. Single Gene Heterosis Associated with a Second Chromosome Recessive Lethal in Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1959 Mar;44(2):211–232. doi: 10.1093/genetics/44.2.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nei M. The frequency distribution of lethal chromosomes in finite populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Jun;60(2):517–524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.2.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ohta T., Kimura M. Behavior of neutral mutants influenced by asociated overdominant loci in finite populations. Genetics. 1971 Oct;69(2):247–260. doi: 10.1093/genetics/69.2.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prout T. Genetic Drift in Irradiated Experimental Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1954 Jul;39(4):529–545. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.4.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Temin R. G. Homozygous viability and fertility loads in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1966 Jan;53(1):27–46. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Temin R. G., Meyer H. U., Dawson P. S., Crow J. F. The influence of epistasis on homozygous viability depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1969 Feb;61(2):497–519. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.2.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tobari Y. N., Kojima K. I. Selective modes associated with inversion karyotypes in Drosophila ananassae. I. Frequency-dependant selection. Genetics. 1967 Sep;57(1):179–188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/57.1.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WALLACE B. Allelism of second chromosome lethals in D. melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1950 Nov;36(11):654–657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.36.11.654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. WALLACE B., DOBZHANSKY T. Experimental proof of balanced genetic loads in Drosophila. Genetics. 1962 Aug;47:1027–1042. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.8.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wills C. The mutational load in two natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Feb;53(2):281–294. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.2.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yamazaki T., Maruyama T. Evidence for the neutral hypothesis of protein polymorphism. Science. 1972 Oct 6;178(4056):56–58. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4056.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES