Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1974 Jun;77(2):343–384. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.2.343

Genetic Variation in Natural Populations of Five Drosophila Species and the Hypothesis of the Selective Neutrality of Protein Polymorphisms

Francisco J Ayala 1, Martin L Tracey 1, Lorraine G Barr 1, John F McDonald 1, Santiago Pérez-Salas 1
PMCID: PMC1213134  PMID: 4847156

Abstract

We have studied genetic variation at 30–32 loci coding for enzymes in natural populations of five species of Drosophila. The average proportion of heterozygous loci per individual is 17.7 ± 0.4%. The average proportion of polymorphic loci per population is 69.2 ± 2.6% or 49.8 ± 2.2%, depending on what criterion of polymorphism is used. The following generalizations are advanced: (1) The amount of genetic polymorphism varies considerably from locus to locus. (2) At a given locus, populations of the same species are very similar in the amount and pattern of genetic variation. (3) However, at some loci large differences sometimes occur between local populations of the same species. (4) The amount of variation at a given locus is approximately the same in all five species. (5) When different species are compared, the pattern of the variation is either essentially identical or totally different at a majority of loci. We have tested the hypothesis that protein polymorphisms are selectively neutral by examining four predictions derived from the hypothesis. Our results are at variance with every one of the predictions. We have measured the amount of genetic differentiation, D, between taxa of various degrees of evolutionary divergence. The average value of D is 0.033 for local populations, 0.228 for subspecies, 0.226 for semispecies, 0.538 for sibling species, and 1.214 for morphologically distinguishable species. Our results indicate that a substantial degree of genetic differentiation (22.8 allelic substitutions for every 100 loci) occurs between allopatric populations that have diverged to the point where they might become different species if they were to become sympatric. However, very little additional genetic change is required for the development of complete reproductive isolation. After the speciation process is completed, species continue to diverge genetically from each other.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayala F. J., Mourão C. A., Pérez-Salas S., Richmond R., Dobzhansky T. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. I. Genetic differentiation among sibling species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Sep;67(1):225–232. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.1.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Dobzhansky T. Polymorphisms in continental and island populations of Drosophila willistoni. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Oct;68(10):2480–2483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.10.2480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Tracey M. L. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila Willistoni group. V. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila equinoxialis. Genet Res. 1972 Aug;20(1):19–42. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300013562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Tracey M. L., Mourão C. A., Pérez-Salas S. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics. 1972 Jan;70(1):113–139. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BURLA H., DA CUNHA A. B. The willistoni group of sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution. 1949 Dec;3(4):300-14, illust. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1949.tb00031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavalli-Sforza L. L. Population structure and human evolution. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Mar 22;164(995):362–379. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KIMURA M., CROW J. F. THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M., Ohta T. Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature. 1971 Feb 12;229(5285):467–469. doi: 10.1038/229467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M. The rate of molecular evolution considered from the standpoint of population genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Aug;63(4):1181–1188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.4.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewontin R. C., Krakauer J. Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics. 1973 May;74(1):175–195. doi: 10.1093/genetics/74.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Selander R. K., Kaufman D. W. Genic variability and strategies of adaptation in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Jun;70(6):1875–1877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.6.1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES