Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1974 Aug;77(4):771–793. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.4.771

The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xii. Linkage Disequilibrium in a Large Local Population

Terumi Muki 1, Takao K Watanabe 1, Osamu Yamaguchi 1
PMCID: PMC1213167  PMID: 4213910

Abstract

Seven hundred and three second chromosomes were extracted from a Raleigh, North Carolina population of Drosophila melanogaster in 1970. Additionally, four hundred and eighty-nine third chromosomes were extracted from a large cage population founded from the flies in the 1970 Raleigh collection. The α glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-1, malate dehydrogenase-1, alcohol dehydrogenase, and α amylase loci were studied from the second chromosomes, and the esterase-6, esterase-C, and octanol dehydrogenase loci were analyzed from the third chromosomes. Inversions, relative viability and fecundity were studied for both classes of chromosomes. The following significant findings were obtained: (1) All loci examined were polymorphic or had at least two alleles at appreciable frequencies. Analysis of the combined data from this experiment with that of Mukai, Mettler and Chigusa (1971) revealed that the frequencies of the genes in the second chromosomes collected in early August were approximately the same over three years. (2) Linkage disequilibria between and among isozyme genes inter se were not detected except in a few cases which can be considered due to non-random sampling. (3) Linkage disequilibria between isozyme genes and polymorphic inversions were detected when the recombination values between the breakage points of the inversions and the genes in question were small. In only a few cases, were second and third order linkage disequilibria including polymorphic inversions detected. (4) Evidence for either variation among genotypes within loci or cumulative effects of heterozygosity was found for viability and fecundity. As a result of these findings, it was tentatively concluded that although selection might be perceptibly operating on some polymorphic isozyme loci, most of the polymorphic isozyme genes are selectively neutral or near-neutral in the populations studied.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allard R. W., Babbel G. R., Clegg M. T., Kahler A. L. Evidence for coadaptation in Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Oct;69(10):3043–3048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.10.3043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Dobzhansky T. Polymorphisms in continental and island populations of Drosophila willistoni. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Oct;68(10):2480–2483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.10.2480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahn E. Crossing over in the chromosomal region determining amylase isozymes in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas. 1967;58(1):1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1967.tb02138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Franklin I., Lewontin R. C. Is the gene the unit of selection? Genetics. 1970 Aug;65(4):707–734. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.4.707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KIMURA M., CROW J. F. THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725–738. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimura M. Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles. Genet Res. 1968 Jun;11(3):247–269. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300011459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimura M., Maruyama T. Pattern of neutral polymorphism in a geographically structured population. Genet Res. 1971 Oct;18(2):125–131. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M., Ohta T. Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature. 1971 Feb 12;229(5285):467–469. doi: 10.1038/229467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kojima K., Gillespie J., Toari Y. N. A profile of Drosophila species' enzymes assayed by electrophoresis. I. Number of alleles, heterozygosities, and linkage disequilibrium in glucose-metabolizing systems and some other enzymes. Biochem Genet. 1970 Oct;4(5):627–637. doi: 10.1007/BF00486100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kojima K., Yarbrough K. M. FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION AT THE ESTERASE 6 LOCUS IN Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Mar;57(3):645–649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lewontin R C. The Interaction of Selection and Linkage. I. General Considerations; Heterotic Models. Genetics. 1964 Jan;49(1):49–67. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Milkman R. D. Heterosis as a major cause of heterozygosity in nature. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):493–495. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohta T., Kimura M. Behavior of neutral mutants influenced by asociated overdominant loci in finite populations. Genetics. 1971 Oct;69(2):247–260. doi: 10.1093/genetics/69.2.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Prakash S., Lewontin R. C. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. 3. Direct evidence of coadaptation in gene arrangements of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Feb;59(2):398–405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sved J. A., Reed T. E., Bodmer W. F. The number of balanced polymorphisms that can be maintained in a natural population. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):469–481. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wills C., Nichols L. How genetic background masks single-gene heterosis in Drosophila (polymorphism-selection-isoenzymes-inbreeding-fly). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Feb;69(2):323–325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.2.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zouros E., Krimbas C. B. Evidence for Linkage Disequilibrium Maintained by Selection in Two Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA. Genetics. 1973 Apr;73(4):659–674. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.4.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES