Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2025 Apr 24;13(6):e02647-24. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02647-24

Genomic insights into Brucella melitensis in India: stability of ST8 and the role of virulence genes in regional adaptations

Haris Ayoub 1,#, M Suman Kumar 1,#, Rishabh Mehta 1, Sanjumon E Sethuraj 1, Prasad Thomas 2, Himani Dhanze 1, Muskan Dubey 3, Harith M Salih 4, Girish B Chandrashekaraiah 5, Charley A Cull 6, Ravindra P Veeranna 3,, Raghavendra G Amachawadi 4,
Editor: Max Maurin7
PMCID: PMC12131837  PMID: 40272150

ABSTRACT

Brucella melitensis is a highly infectious zoonotic pathogen responsible for brucellosis, which significantly affects both human and livestock health worldwide. This study employed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to analyze the genetic diversity of 24 B. melitensis isolates from India. Pangenome analysis revealed a highly conserved nature with the involved strains having very limited accessory genes. Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) identified sequence type ST8 as predominant among Indian strains. Analysis of virulence genes revealed a total of 43 virulence-related genes in all strains, emphasizing their critical role in the pathogenicity of B. melitensis. Unique gene profiles and distinct phylogenetic clusters suggest regional adaptations and evolutionary pressures. The comprehensive genomic insights from this study help to elucidate the geographic distribution and interspecies transmission of Indian strains, highlighting the importance of targeted brucellosis control measures in India. Additionally, the identification of conserved virulence genes involved in immune evasion and intracellular survival highlights their importance in the bacterium’s pathogenicity. This research contributes to the global understanding of B. melitensis genomic diversity, providing valuable insights for broader epidemiological studies and brucellosis management strategies worldwide.

IMPORTANCE

B. melitensis is a significant cause of illness in both humans and animals, particularly in India, where the disease remains a major concern. This study highlights that only a few genetic types of the bacteria are circulating in the region, which means control efforts can be better focused on these specific types. By understanding the unique characteristics of Indian strains, and how these strains spread and adapt, this research offers valuable guidance for improving brucellosis prevention strategies. These insights can help in developing more effective diagnostic tools, enhancing vaccination efforts, and strengthening disease control programs to reduce the impact of brucellosis on public health and livestock industries.

KEYWORDS: Brucellosis, phylogeny, pangenome, MSLT

INTRODUCTION

Brucella melitensis is a highly infectious zoonotic pathogen responsible for brucellosis, a disease that significantly affects both humans and livestock. Brucellosis remains a significant public health concern globally, with an estimated 2.1 million new human infections annually (1). B. melitensis, the most virulent species for humans, primarily affects goats and sheep (2), with zoonotic transmission occurring through the ingestion of unpasteurized dairy products or direct contact with infected animal tissues (3). Despite its significant impact, brucellosis is often underreported and misdiagnosed, particularly in endemic regions, due to its nonspecific clinical presentation, which includes fever, malaise, and musculoskeletal pain (4). Brucellosis is particularly prevalent in developing countries, including India, where it poses substantial public health and economic challenges (5). The pathogen is primarily transmitted through direct contact with infected animals or the consumption of contaminated animal products, such as unpasteurized milk (3). The epidemiology of B. melitensis in India is complex, involving multiple transmission routes and diverse animal reservoirs (4).

Understanding the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of B. melitensis is crucial for effective disease control and prevention. Phylogenetic studies provide insights into the evolutionary history and geographical distribution of the pathogen, aiding in the identification of outbreak sources and transmission pathways (6). Recent advancements in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) have significantly enhanced our understanding of the genetic diversity and evolution of B. melitensis. WGS allows for comprehensive analysis of the entire genome, identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, deletions, and other genetic variations (3).

Traditional methods of studying genetic diversity, such as phage typing and biotyping based on biochemical and serological characteristics, have limitations in their discriminatory power and reproducibility (7). In contrast, molecular techniques like MLST offer higher resolution and have become the gold standard for epidemiological studies (8). MLST characterizes strains based on the sequences of multiple housekeeping genes, allowing for the assignment of sequence types (STs) and facilitating comparison across different studies and geographical regions (9). Pangenome analysis extends this approach by comparing the entire genome content of multiple strains, identifying core and accessory genes, and elucidating the genetic basis of phenotypic diversity. This approach provides insights into the genetic repertoire of the species and the mechanisms underlying its adaptability and pathogenicity (1012).

Whole-genome phylogeny uses WGS data to construct phylogenetic trees that reveal the evolutionary relationships among strains. This method provides a high-resolution view of genetic relationships and can identify clades and lineages with precision (13, 14). Combining WGS with MLST, pangenome analysis and whole-genome phylogeny enable a detailed understanding of the genetic structure and epidemiology of B. melitensis (1416).

In India, brucellosis is endemic in many regions, with significant implications for public health and livestock productivity. Despite this, there is a paucity of data on the genetic diversity of B. melitensis strains circulating in the country. Previous studies have primarily focused on seroprevalence and clinical aspects, with limited molecular epidemiological investigations (4, 11, 1722). Understanding the genetic diversity of B. melitensis in India is crucial for developing effective control strategies and preventing the spread of the disease (21). By identifying the genetic diversity and transmission dynamics of B. melitensis, we can develop more targeted diagnostic tools and vaccines, improve surveillance and control measures, and ultimately reduce the burden of brucellosis in India.

This study aims to analyze the genetic diversity of B. melitensis strains isolated from humans and livestock in India using a combination of MLST, pangenome analysis, and whole-genome phylogeny. By employing these advanced molecular techniques, we seek to elucidate the genetic relationships among these strains and provide a comprehensive overview of the epidemiological landscape of B. melitensis in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selection of isolates

B. melitensis isolates used in this study were obtained from a previously established collection of strains submitted for confirmation and biotyping at the Brucella Laboratory, Division of Veterinary Public Health, ICAR-IVRI, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh. This study analyzed a total of 24 isolates collected from various regions across India between 2006 and 2023. These isolates comprised 20 from humans, 1 from a goat, and 3 from sheep. Initial cultivation of these isolates involved inoculating samples onto Brucella agar and incubating them at 37°C under 10% CO2 for up to 7 days. The isolates underwent identification through Gram staining, biochemical tests, and dye inhibition tests, following the established protocols (23). Species confirmation was achieved using AMOS PCR (24), with B. melitensis 16M (ATCC 23456; NCTC 10094) serving as the reference positive control strain.

Extraction of genomic DNA from isolates

For genome sequencing, genomic DNA was extracted from 23 recent subcultures of B. melitensis isolates using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN), following the manufacturer’s protocol with nuclease-free water (NFW) as the solvent. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were assessed by measuring its optical density (OD) at 260 and 280 nm using a spectrophotometer (Eppendorf BioSpectrometer Basic- EP6135000923). The purified DNA samples were subsequently shipped on dry ice for whole-genome sequencing.

Genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation

Genome sequencing of the 23 isolates (excluding VPH-17-72) was carried out on the Illumina MiSeq platform, generating 150 bp paired-end reads (miBiome Therapeutics LLP). Whole-genome sequence of the isolate VPH-17-72 (Goat origin) was retrieved from the NCBI database and used in the study. The quality of the raw reads was assessed using FastP v0.23.2 (25). The high-quality trimmed reads were then assembled de novo using Unicycler v0.5.0 (26) to construct genome representing contigs.

The quality of the genome assemblies was evaluated using QUAST v5.2.0 (27), which analyzed metrics such as N50 (the contig length at which half of the genome is covered), contig size, and the number of uncalled bases (Ns). The completeness of the genome assemblies was further assessed using the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO v5.4.6) tool (28). For gene prediction, functional annotation, and feature identification, the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (29) was employed. Most of the bioinformatics analysis was conducted on the Galaxy Europe platform (usegalaxy.org) (30). The genome sequence of B. melitensis bv 1 str. 16M served as the reference for ordering the contigs and ensuring the accuracy of the assembled genomes.

Comparative genomic analysis

Data retrieval

The comparative genomic analysis encompassed the 24 study isolates (including VPH-17-72) of B. melitensis from humans and livestock in India, collected between 2006 and 2023. Genome data for 38 B. melitensis strains were downloaded from the NCBI database, encompassing various regions, including India, China, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. Details such as host, geographical location, year of isolation, and accession numbers were noted for all strains to provide comprehensive contextual information for comparative analysis (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Metadata of 38 B. melitensis isolates retrieved from NCBI for phylogeny

S. no Strain Assembly accession Place Source Date of collection Host
1 M5-10 GCA_000292065.1 China Vaccine strain NAa NAa
2 BCB033 GCA_000292085.2 China Blood 2006 Human
3 BCB028 GCA_000292165.2 China Blood 1956 Sheep
4 133 GCA_000298595.1 China Blood 1998 Human
5 128 GCA_000298615.1 China Serum 1986 Human
6 ADMAS-G1 GCA_000444515.1 India Placenta 2013 Goat
7 BRUC048 GCA_001608355.1 Egypt Blood NAa NAa
8 KU_RCF-96 GCA_001702255.1 Kuwait Blood 2014 Human
9 KU_RCF-84 GCA_001702305.1 Kuwait Blood 2014 Human
10 KU_RCF-03 GCA_001702375.1 Kuwait Blood 2014 Human
11 Br-m-1771_12-Geo GCA_001856285.1 Georgia Blood 2012 Human
12 Br-m-1252_10-Geo GCA_001856295.1 Georgia Milk 2010 Cattle
13 Br-m-1268_11-Geo GCA_001856365.1 Georgia Milk 2011 Cattle
14 VRI-6856_11 GCA_002245205.1 Malaysia Milk 2011 Goat
15 VRI4799_15 GCA_002245235.1 Malaysia Milk 2015 Goat
16 2007BM_1 GCA_002290125.1 India Blood 2007 Human
17 CIIMS-NV-5 GCA_002871075.1 India Vaginal discharge 2016 Goat
18 CIIMS-BH-2 GCA_002895105.1 India Blood 2016 Human
19 CIIMS-PH-3 GCA_002895125.1 India Blood 2016 Human
20 Rev-1_passage101 GCA_002953595.1 USA NAa 1970 Small ruminants
21 CIIMS-NV-1 GCA_003205535.1 India NAa 2016 Animal
22 KSA_BM_07 GCA_003432005.1 Saudi Arabia Fetal fluids 2017 Sheep
23 CIT21 GCA_003516045.1 China Cell culture 2015 Human
24 CIT31 GCA_003516065.1 China Cell culture 2015 Human
25 CIT43 GCA_003516085.1 China Cell culture 2015 Human
26 LMN19 GCA_003989635.1 India Placenta 2018 Goat
27 LMN20 GCA_003989875.1 India Placenta 2018 Goat
28 LMN18 GCA_003989885.1 India Foetal stomach content 2018 Goat
29 LMN17 GCA_003989895.1 India Foetal stomach content 2018 Goat
30 2011-TE-13541-1-1 GCA_006517325.1 Italy NAa 2011 Goat
31 2016-TE-17270-1-1 GCA_006517335.1 Italy NAa 2016 Sheep
32 TN_CUL_1 GCA_014270005.1 India Fetal stomach content 2017 Sheep
33 QH2019001 GCA_016411965.1 China Blood 2019 Human
34 QH2019005 GCA_016806105.1 China Blood 2019 Human
35 BMNDDB8664 GCA_022348405.1 India Vaginal swab 2019 Cattle
36 BRC9_11 GCA_028129055.1 Malaysia Blood 2011 Human
37 BRC5_11 GCA_028129055.1 Malaysia Blood 2011 Human
38 BRC27_11 GCA_028129085.1 Malaysia Blood 2011 Human
a

Not available.

Pangenome analysis

Pangenome analysis was conducted using Panaroo (31) to explore the genetic diversity and identify core and accessory genes within the B. melitensis strains. The results were visualized to illustrate the distribution of gene presence and absence among the isolates. This analysis provided insights into the genetic repertoire of the species, including genes that contribute to its adaptability and pathogenicity. Two-dimensional scaling and visualization of the pangenome were performed using FriPan (https://github.com/drpowell/FriPan), facilitating the examination of genetic differences and similarities among the isolates.

MLST & virulence genes

Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) was employed to genotype the B. melitensis isolates. Genotyping was performed using the PubMLST—Brucella database (https://pubmlst.org/), applying both nine-locus (9) and 21-locus (32) schemes, as well as the cgMLST scheme (33) to characterize the isolates based on their sequence types, facilitating comparisons across different studies. Virulence factors were predicted using ABRicate searches of assembled contigs against the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) with a minimum 90% DNA identity and coverage (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) (34, 35). This analysis identified genes associated with pathogenicity and virulence.

Phylogeny and global clustering

To infer the phylogenetic relationships among the B. melitensis strains, whole-genome alignment was performed using parSNP v1.2 (https://github.com/marbl/parsnp) (36). The output from parSNP was converted into a multiple sequence alignment in FASTA format, which was then transformed into phylip format. The resulting alignment was used to construct a phylogenetic tree.

For global clustering, the optimal model and method were identified, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using RAxML-NG v1.2.0, employing the maximum likelihood approach with the GTR + G substitution model. An initial tree search with 10 parsimony trees was conducted, followed by 200 bootstrap iterations to evaluate the robustness of the inferred phylogeny (37). The phylogenetic tree was visualized and annotated with relevant metadata using iTOL (38). This analysis provided insights into the global phylogenetic relationships and clustering of Indian B. melitensis strains among global strains, revealing their evolutionary history and spread patterns.

Minimum spanning tree analysis

Core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) was performed using PyMLST (39), an open-source tool for rapid MLST assignment. A total of 63 Brucella melitensis strains were included in the analysis, comprising 36 Indian isolates (24 study isolates and 12 from NCBI) and 27 global isolates. The cgMLST scheme for B. melitensis was applied, identifying 1,763 core genes from a total of 1,764 loci across all strains. To assess genetic relatedness, a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) was constructed using GrapeTree (MSTreeV2) (40). The MST was generated based on allele differences between strains. A minimum coverage threshold of 50 strains (-m 50) was applied to retain genes found in at least 50 isolates, ensuring robust cluster formation and minimizing missing data artifacts.

RESULTS

Virulence genes

The Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) identified a total of 43 virulence-related genes across all tested strains of Brucella melitensis (Table 2). The majority of these genes were part of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) operon, comprising 27 genes that play crucial roles in entry, intracellular survival, and immunomodulation. Additionally, 12 genes associated with the type IV secretion system (virB1-virB12) were identified, which are vital for effector secretion. Other significant virulence genes included btpA and btpB (TIR domain-containing proteins involved in immune evasion), ricA (Rab2 interacting conserved protein A for intracellular survival), and cgs (cyclic beta 1–2 glucan synthetase for intracellular survival).

TABLE 2.

Virulence and pathogenicity factors identified in B. melitensis strains

Virulence and pathogenicity factors Function Genes
LPS (lipopolysaccharide) pathogenicity factors Entry, intracellular, survival, and immunomodulatory acpXL, fabZ, gmd, htrB, kdsA, kdsB, lpsA, lpsB/lpcC, lpxA, lpxB, lpxC, lpxD, lpxE, manAoAg, manCoAg, per, pgm, pmm, wbdA, wbkA, wbkB, wbkC, wboA, wbpL, wbpZ, wzm, wzt
Type IV secretion system Effector secretion virB1, virB2, virB3, virB4, virB5, virB6, virB7, virB8, virB9, virB10, virB11, virB12
TIR domain-containing protein Immune evasion btpA, btpB
Rab2 interacting conserved protein A Intracellular survival RicA
Cyclic beta 1–2 glucan synthetase Intracellular survival Cgs

Multilocus sequence typing

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) based on the 9-locus and 21-locus schemes identified all Brucella isolates as sequence type ST8. The core genome MLST (cgMLST) scheme revealed five different sequence types among the study isolates, demonstrating some genetic diversity within this species (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Multilocus sequence analysis and cgMLST results for B. Melitensis isolates

Strain MLST9 scheme MLST21 scheme cgMLST Loci matched
16M 7 7 218
VPH-06-01 8 8 557 99.40%
VPH-08-01 8 8 557 100%
VPH-08-02 8 8 225 97.40%
VPH-17-72 8 8 573 100%
VPH-19-01 8 8 670 98.50%
VPH-19-02 8 8 670 99.20%
VPH-19-03 8 8 670 95%
VPH-19-04 8 8 225 96.40%
VPH-19-05 8 8 670 98.30%
VPH-19-06 8 8 557/565 98.40%
VPH-19-07 8 8 670 99.20%
VPH-20-01 8 8 670 98.10%
VPH-20-02 8 8 670 99.70%
VPH-20-03 8 8 670 98.30%
VPH-20-04 8 8 670 98.40%
VPH-21-01 8 8 557/565 98.80%
VPH-21-02 8 8 557 98.70%
VPH-22-01 8 8 557 98.30%
VPH-22-02 8 8 557 98.6%
VPH-22-03 8 8 670 97.80%
VPH-22-04 8 8 670 99.50%
VPH-22-05 8 8 565 98.90%
VPH-23-01 8 8 670 99.30%
VPH-23-02 8 8 670 99.30%

Pangenome and phylogeny

The pangenome analysis of the B. melitensis isolates revealed a highly conserved core genome structure, consisting of 2,899 core genes and an additional 185 soft core genes among a total of 3,150 genes (Table 4). This indicates a significant degree of genetic conservation within the species. One isolate, VPH-19-03, displayed about 6% missing genes and a genome fraction of only 94% compared to the reference, suggesting some unique genetic variations.

TABLE 4.

Pangenome summary of study isolates

Genes Gene coverage No. of genes identified
Core genes (99% <= strains <= 100%) 2,899
Soft core genes (95% <= strains < 99%) 185
Shell genes (15% <= strains < 95%) 35
Cloud genes (0% <= strains < 15%) 31
Total genes (0% <= strains <= 100%) 3,150

The visualization of the pangenome composition further illustrated the conserved nature of the B. melitensis genome. The FriPan dendrogram (Fig. 1) identified five distinct clades among the Indian strains, with most isolates clustering into two main clades. The isolates VPH-19-03, VPH-19-05, and VPH-17-72 formed outgroups in the Fripan dendrogram due to the absence of certain genes, which distinguished them from the main clades within the dendrogram, as depicted with two-dimensional visualization of genomes in Fig. 2.

Fig 1.

Dendrogram clusters samples VPH and BM16M based on similarity. VPH-19-03 and BM16M cluster distantly, while most VPH samples form tight clusters.

Dendrogram showing genetic relationships among Brucella melitensis isolates based on gene presence-absence. The scale at the top indicates genetic distance, with closer branches showing higher similarity between isolates.

Fig 2.

Horizontal bar plot compares genomic regions across samples VPH and BM16M. Most VPH samples contain continuous regions, while BM16M, VPH-19-05, and VPH-19-03 contain fragmented regions.

Comparative genome structure of Brucella melitensis strains based on gene presence-absence data. The top panel represents a two-dimensional whole-genome comparison, where green bars indicate the presence of genes and gray bars indicate their absence across different strains. The red-highlighted section at the right of the top panel shows a region of notable variability, which is expanded in the lower portion for a detailed view. Each row represents a different strain and the horizontal continuity of green bars denotes conserved regions, while interruptions reflect gene absences or strain-specific variations

The phylogenetic tree constructed with 38 strains from other countries revealed distinct clustering of Indian strains and those from other countries. Indian isolates did not cluster with isolates from China, Malaysia, Kuwait, or Saudi Arabia, which formed separate clades, indicating distinct phylogenetic lineages (Fig. 3).

Fig 3.

Circular phylogenetic tree of samples from multiple countries and regions with bootstrap values, outer ring indicates geographic origin, and inner ring represents bootstrap support levels for branches.

Core genome SNP-based maximum likelihood tree depicting the phylogenetic relationship of the study isolates to 38 strains from other countries (Branch color depicts bootstrap, Place of isolation is depicted by color strip).

Minimum spanning tree analysis

The Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) analysis of 63 Brucella melitensis isolates, including 36 from India and 27 from global sources, revealed distinct genetic clustering patterns. Indian isolates (blue) formed a dense, interconnected cluster, indicating high genetic relatedness. Chinese isolates (red) and those from Malaysia, Georgia, Kuwait, and other regions formed separate branches, suggesting genetic divergence. A reference strain (black node) appeared as a distinct, unconnected entity (Fig. 4a). Some global isolates were positioned distantly, reflecting unique genetic variations. Within India (Fig. 4b), Tamil Nadu (blue) and Karnataka (light blue) isolates dominated the network with closely linked nodes, while Punjab (orange), Maharashtra (brown), and other states displayed separate clustering patterns. White nodes, representing isolates from global data sets or reference strains, diverged from Indian strains and appeared as distinct branches within the MST.

Fig 4.

Haplotype networks of samples grouped by country and state, where node sizes depict sample counts and edges depict mutational steps. Clustering patterns align with geographic origin and genetic distance.

Minimum spanning tree depicting cgMLST profile of the Brucella melitensis isolates. Size of each circle proportionate to the number of isolates. (a) MST depicting the genetic relationships among 63 B. melitensis isolates, including 36 from India (blue) and 27 from other countries. Each node represents a unique isolate, with colors indicating geographic origin. (b) MST showing the genetic distribution of B. melitensis isolates in India, color-coded by state. White nodes represent global/reference strains.

Among the Indian isolates, a total of 10 core genome sequence types (cgSTs) were identified, with cgST 670, 557, 565, and 573 being the most common, and cgST 670 being the most prevalent. Additional cgSTs included 225, 247, 556, 558, 1,185, and 1,167. Comparison with global strains revealed that Chinese isolates exhibited 10 distinct cgSTs among 10 strains, while Malaysia, Georgia, and Kuwait each had three cgSTs. The two isolates from Italy shared the same cgST, and the reference strain (cgST 218) (Table S1) showed no genetic overlap with the Indian isolates. The overall clustering pattern within the MST reflects cgST distribution, indicating high genetic relatedness among Indian strains and a clear separation from global isolates.

DISCUSSION

Brucellosis is a significant zoonotic disease, necessitating early diagnosis and control measures. The pathogen is endemic in India, with a nationwide survey indicating seroprevalence rates of 11.55% in sheep and 5.37% in goats (41).

Virulence factor genes essential for the pathogenicity of Brucella melitensis are primarily involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) synthesis, intracellular survival, and secretion systems. Among the 43 identified virulence genes, the LPS operon (27 genes) plays a key role in immune evasion and intracellular persistence, allowing B. melitensis to avoid immune recognition (42). The type IV secretion system (virB1-virB12) secretes effector proteins that manipulate host cell processes, preventing phagosome-lysosome fusion and enabling bacterial replication within macrophages (43, 44). The bacterial TIR-domain-containing proteins, btpA and btpB, interfere with MyD88-dependent signaling, impairing pro-inflammatory cytokine responses and delaying host immune activation (45). The virulence gene profiles in our study were highly conserved across all Indian isolates, suggesting that B. melitensis relies on a stable set of pathogenicity determinants. Similar findings from other studies reinforce the significance of these genes in pathogenesis and host adaptation (11, 46). This conservation aligns with global reports indicating a highly stable pathogenicity profile across different geographical regions (14, 15, 47).

Few studies have conducted genome analysis and comparative genomics of Indian B. melitensis strains. Pan-genome analysis revealed a highly conserved core genome with 2,899 core genes and only 185 accessory genes among the 24 isolates analyzed. This conservation aligns with previous findings of low genetic variability within B. melitensis (48). However, the identification of unique gene profiles in isolates such as VPH-19-03 suggests that regional adaptations and niche-specific evolutionary pressures may contribute to genetic differentiation. Such findings emphasize the dynamic nature of bacterial genomes in response to environmental and host-specific factors (49, 50). Two-dimensional scaling indicated five clades among the Indian strains, and clustering of strains from the same regions were observed. This highlights the genetic stability within a particular region and the possibility for differentiating strains based on whole-genome sequence data. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) showed that all 24 Indian strains belonged to ST8. Identification of five different cgMLST types aligns with the clustering analysis. Phylogenetic analyses further supported the distinct clustering of Indian strains, separate from those of other countries. Phylogenetic comparisons with 38 global strains showed that Indian isolates did not cluster with strains from China, the Middle East, or Southeast Asia, supporting restricted genetic exchange and localized evolution in B. melitensis. This finding is crucial for brucellosis epidemiology, as it indicates that outbreaks in India are likely driven by endemic transmission rather than frequent introductions from other regions. Similar studies using SNP-based whole-genome phylogenetics have also reported distinct phylogenetic separation of B. melitensis strains by geographic origin, highlighting the role of regional selection pressures in shaping bacterial evolution (11, 51). Phylogenetic analysis of Indian strains in our study demonstrated geographical clustering and showed strong correlation with cgMLST, consistent with findings by (11, 46). The minimum spanning tree (MST) analysis of B. melitensis isolates closely mirrored phylogenetic relationships, effectively capturing genetic relatedness and geographic distribution patterns. The clustering of strains within the MST indicated high genetic relatedness among Indian isolates and a clear separation from global strains. This observation aligns with previous studies that have demonstrated regional clustering of B. melitensis strains (5254). These insights into the genomic epidemiology of B. melitensis are essential for the development of more effective diagnostic tools, which can improve early detection and control of brucellosis outbreaks. Moreover, the identification of conserved virulence genes and stable sequence types provides promising targets for vaccine development, which could lead to more effective prevention measures. Additionally, the genetic information uncovered in this study has the potential to inform therapeutic interventions, guiding the development of treatments that are tailored to the specific genetic makeup of regional B. melitensis strains.

The absence of specific genes in B. melitensis is a significant factor in the bacterium’s genome reduction, a process involving the loss of non-essential genes over time. Genome reduction is a common evolutionary strategy among intracellular pathogens and symbionts, leading to streamlined genomes highly specialized for their specific niches (55). This phenomenon results in the loss of genes involved in diverse metabolic pathways, stress responses, and regulatory networks. For instance, genes encoding for enzymes, such as glycine cleavage system H protein, 5-deoxy-glucuronate isomerase, and uronate isomerase, which are involved in amino acid degradation and carbohydrate metabolism, may be deemed non-essential if the host provides sufficient nutrients. The absence of these genes in B. melitensis suggests a reliance on the host for specific nutrients, reducing the metabolic burden on the bacterium’s genome and contributing to genome streamlining (55, 56).

The loss of genes involved in stress responses, such as the sulfur carrier protein fdhD and ABC transporter systems (e.g., ycjO, ousW), indicates an adaptation to the relatively stable intracellular environment of the host. These genes are critical for surviving external stress conditions, but within the host, B. melitensis experiences less environmental variability and fewer oxidative stresses. Thus, these genes become redundant, and their loss aids in genome reduction by eliminating unnecessary genetic material (57). Although essential for ribosome function and protein synthesis, certain ribosomal RNA modification genes, such as the ribosomal RNA large subunit methyltransferase E, may be lost if redundant or if alternative pathways suffice. Genome reduction in this context involves retaining only the most efficient and necessary components for protein synthesis, reflecting a highly specialized adaptation to the host environment (56).

Several genes regulating virulence factors, such as the DNA replication inhibitor toxin socB and various regulatory proteins (e.g., hydrogen peroxide-inducible genes activator, leucine-responsive regulatory protein), may be lost if their functions are compensated by other mechanisms or if they are not essential for survival within the host. The absence of these genes can lead to a streamlined genome that focuses on essential virulence factors, enhancing the bacterium’s efficiency in host colonization and infection (58). ABC transporter proteins (e.g., ycjO, oppD, oppC) and other membrane-associated proteins are often lost during genome reduction if the host environment sufficiently supports the bacterium’s nutrient and ion needs. The absence of these transport systems reduces the genomic and metabolic burden, allowing B. melitensis to maintain a minimalistic yet effective set of transport mechanisms necessary for survival within the host (55).

Genome reduction in B. melitensis leads to the loss of non-essential genes involved in metabolic versatility, stress response, and regulatory networks, resulting in a more specialized pathogen with a narrow ecological niche. This reduction might limit the bacterium’s ability to adapt to diverse environments and host conditions, impacting its metabolic flexibility and stress resilience (42, 59). However, streamlining the genome can enhance the efficiency of the remaining pathways, providing a selective advantage within specific niches, such as host cells, where the pathogen may exhibit increased survival. Additionally, the absence of horizontal DNA transfer mechanisms and mobile genetic elements further stabilizes the genome, contributing to host adaptation and virulence through pseudogenization and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (60). This evolutionary trade-off reflects a balance between adaptability and specialization, influencing the overall pathogenicity and survivability of B. melitensis.

Conclusion

The integration of virulence gene analysis, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pangenome, and phylogenetic approaches provides a robust and multifaceted understanding of the genetic diversity and evolutionary dynamics of Brucella melitensis. By employing these advanced genomic techniques, the study reveals the genetic stability of sequence type ST8 among Indian strains, which appears to be conserved despite varying environmental and host-related pressures. This stability is particularly significant in the context of ability of B. melitensis to cause brucellosis, a disease of substantial public health and economic concern in India. The identification of 43 key virulence genes further underscores the critical role these genetic elements play in the pathogen’s ability to infect and cause disease.

The research findings suggest that regional adaptations, driven by unique environmental conditions and host interactions, as well as niche-specific evolutionary pressures, are contributing factors to the genetic differentiation observed among Indian isolates. These adaptations likely reflect a complex interplay between the bacterium and its environment, which may influence its virulence and transmission dynamics. Understanding these factors is crucial not only for grasping the local epidemiology of brucellosis but also for informing global strategies to combat this zoonotic disease.

Beyond its implications for India, this research contributes to the global understanding of B. melitensis diversity and evolution, offering valuable insights that can be applied to other regions where brucellosis remains a significant threat. By enhancing the broader scientific community’s knowledge of the genetic and evolutionary underpinnings of this pathogen, the study lays the groundwork for more coordinated and informed efforts to manage and ultimately eradicate brucellosis worldwide.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thankfully acknowledge the Director IVRI for providing the necessary facilities for the conduct of the study.

The study was conducted under the ICAR funded All India Network Program on One Health at the Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, India. This work was supported, in part, by the Xavier University, Aruba. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to publish.

H.A.: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft; M.S.K.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision; R.M.: Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing; S.E.S.: Writing – review and editing; P.T.: Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing; H.D.: Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing; M.D.: Writing – review and editing; H.M.S.: Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing; G.B.C.: Methodology, Writing – review and editing; C.A.C.: Resources, Writing – review and editing; R.P.V: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review and editing; R.G.A.: Software, Resources, Data curation, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Ravindra P. Veeranna, Email: rveerannaphd@xusom.com.

Raghavendra G. Amachawadi, Email: agraghav@vet.k-state.edu.

Max Maurin, UJF-Grenoble 1, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study as samples were collected from human patients visiting a tertiary care center and from animals during outbreak investigation. All the samples from human patients were collected as a part of the laboratory diagnosis of the patients' illnesses and while collecting the sample, informed consent was taken by the sample collection section and ethical guidelines were duly followed. The samples from animals were collected during outbreak investigations by a team of veterinarians. The study program was duly approved vide order no. F. 4-6 (M-6298)/2021-Acad. dated 6 April 2023 by the Deemed University, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute as part of a Master’s degree dissertation work.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The Whole Genome Sequences of the study isolates have been deposited in GenBank with relevant metadata under accession nos. JAYWOX000000000, JAYWOY000000000, JAYWOZ000000000, JAYWPA000000000, JAYWPB000000000, JAYWPC000000000, JAYWPD000000000, JAYWPF000000000, JAYWPG000000000, JAYWPH000000000, JAYWPI000000000, JAYWPJ000000000, JAYWPK000000000, JAYWPL000000000, JAYWPM000000000, JAYWPN000000000, JAYWPK000000000, JAYWPO000000000, JAYWPP000000000, JAYWPQ000000000, JAYWPR000000000, JAYWPS000000000 and JAYWPT000000000.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02647-24.

Table S1. spectrum.02647-24-s0001.docx.

Core genome sequence types and geographic distribution of Brucella melitensis isolates.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02647-24.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Laine CG, Johnson VE, Scott HM, Arenas-Gamboa AM. 2023. Global estimate of human brucellosis incidence. Emerg Infect Dis 29:1789–1797. doi: 10.3201/eid2909.230052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Corbel MJ. 1997. Brucellosis: an overview. Emerg Infect Dis 3:213–221. doi: 10.3201/eid0302.970219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Azam S, Rao SB, Jakka P, NarasimhaRao V, Bhargavi B, Gupta VK, Radhakrishnan G. 2016. Genetic characterization and comparative genome analysis of Brucella melitensis isolates from India. Int J Genomics 2016:3034756. doi: 10.1155/2016/3034756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barua A, Kumar A, Thavaselvam D, Mangalgi S, Prakash A, Tiwari S, Arora S, Sathyaseelan K. 2016. Isolation & characterization of Brucella melitensis isolated from patients suspected for human brucellosis in India. Indian J Med Res 143:652–658. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.187115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dash SK, Jena L, Panigrahy R, Sahu S, Singh S. 2022. Brucella melitensis lurking threat in eastern part of Odisha - a case report. J Pure Appl Microbiol 16:2949–2953. doi: 10.22207/JPAM.16.4.12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Shevtsova E, Vergnaud G, Shevtsov A, Shustov A, Berdimuratova K, Mukanov K, Syzdykov M, Kuznetsov A, Lukhnova L, Izbanova U, Filipenko M, Ramankulov Y. 2019. Genetic diversity of Brucella melitensis in Kazakhstan in relation to world-wide diversity. Front Microbiol 10:1897. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Khan AU, Melzer F, Sayour AE, Shell WS, Linde J, Abdel-Glil M, El-Soally S, Elschner MC, Sayour HEM, Ramadan ES, Mohamed SA, Hendam A, Ismail RI, Farahat LF, Roesler U, Neubauer H, El-Adawy H. 2021. Whole-genome sequencing for tracing the genetic diversity of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis isolated from livestock in Egypt.. Pathogens 10:759. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10060759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Whatmore AM, Perrett LL, MacMillan AP. 2007. Characterisation of the genetic diversity of Brucella by multilocus sequencing. BMC Microbiol 7:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Tettelin H, Riley D, Cattuto C, Medini D. 2008. Comparative genomics: the bacterial pan-genome. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:472–477. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Karthik K, Anbazhagan S, Thomas P, Ananda Chitra M, Senthilkumar TMA, Sridhar R, Dhinakar Raj G. 2021. Genome sequencing and comparative genomics of Indian isolates of Brucella melitensis.. Front Microbiol 12:698069. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.698069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Yang Z, Chai Z, Wang X, Zhang Z, Zhang F, Kang F, Liu W, Ren H, Jin Y, Yue J. 2024. Comparative genomic analysis provides insights into the genetic diversity and pathogenicity of the genus Brucella. Front Microbiol 15:1389859. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1389859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Foster JT, Beckstrom-Sternberg SM, Pearson T, Beckstrom-Sternberg JS, Chain PSG, Roberto FF, Hnath J, Brettin T, Keim P. 2009. Whole-genome-based phylogeny and divergence of the genus Brucella. J Bacteriol 191:2864–2870. doi: 10.1128/JB.01581-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rabinowitz P, Zilberman B, Motro Y, Roberts MC, Greninger A, Nesher L, Ben-Shimol S, Yagel Y, Gdalevich M, Sagi O, Davidovitch N, Kornspan D, Bardenstein S, Moran-Gilad J. 2021. Whole genome sequence analysis of Brucella melitensis phylogeny and virulence factors. Microbiol Res (Pavia) 12:698–710. doi: 10.3390/microbiolres12030050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ötkün S, Erdenliğ Gürbi Lek S. 2024. Whole-genome sequencing-based analysis of Brucella species isolated from ruminants in various regions of Türki̇ye. BMC Infect Dis 24:1220. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09921-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ashford RT, Muchowski J, Koylass M, Scholz HC, Whatmore AM. 2020. Application of whole genome sequencing and pan-family multi-locus sequence analysis to characterize relationships within the family Brucellaceae. Front Microbiol 11:1329. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Modak D, Biswas S, Mondal A, Biswas M, Mascellino MT, Chakraborty B, Tiwari S, Shewale AD, Nale T, Dey R. 2024. Seroprevalence of brucellosis among animal handlers in West Bengal, India: an occupational health study. AIMS Microbiol 10:1–11. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Parai D, Sahoo SK, Pattnaik M, Swain A, Peter A, Samanta LJ, Pradhan R, Choudhary HR, Nahak KC, Pati S, Bhattacharya D. 2022. Seroprevalence of human brucellosis among the tribal and non-tribal population residing in an Eastern state of India: findings from the state-wide serosurvey. Front Microbiol 13:1070276. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1070276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kumari G, Doimari S, Suman Kumar M, Singh M, Singh DK. 2023. MLVA typing of Brucella melitensis and B. abortus isolates of animal and human origin from India. Anim Biotechnol 34:375–383. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2021.1971685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Anbazhagan S, Himani KM, Karthikeyan R, Prakasan L, Dinesh M, Nair SS, Lalsiamthara JAbhishek kRamachandra SG, Chaturvedi VK, Chaudhuri P, Thomas P. 2023. Comparative genomics of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis unravels the gene sharing, virulence factors and SNP diversity among the standard, vaccine and field strains. Int Microbiol 27:101–111. doi: 10.1007/s10123-023-00374-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Gonuguntla HN, Surendra KSNL, Prasad A, Sarangi LN, Rana SK, Manasa G, Muthappa PN, Harikumar AV, Sharma GK. 2023. Brucella melitensis: divergence among Indian strains and genetic characterization of a strain isolated from cattle. Indian J Microbiol 63:272–280. doi: 10.1007/s12088-023-01081-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Prakash JAJ, Jacob JJ, Rachel T, Vasudevan K, Amladi A, Iyadurai R, Manesh A, Veeraraghavan B. 2023. Genomic analysis of Brucella melitensis reveals new insights into phylogeny and evolutionary divergence. Indian J Med Microbiol 44:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2023.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Alton GG, Jones LM, Pietz DE, Organization WH . 1975. Laboratory techniques in brucellosis. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/38676/WHO_MONO_55_part2.pdf. [PubMed]
  • 24. Bricker BJ, Halling SM. 1994. Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 32:2660–2666. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2660-2666.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. Quast: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. Busco: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, Beek M, Bouvier D, Čech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, re producible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:w537–w544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Tonkin-Hill G, MacAlasdair N, Ruis C, Weimann A, Horesh G, Lees JA, Gladstone RA, Lo S, Beaudoin C, Floto RA, Frost SDW, Corander J, Bentley SD, Parkhill J. 2020. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol 21:180. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Whatmore AM, Koylass MS, Muchowski J, Edwards-Smallbone J, Gopaul KK, Perrett LL. 2016. Extended multilocus sequence analysis to describe the global population structure of the genus Brucella: phylogeography and relationship to biovars. Front Microbiol 7:2049. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Abdel-Glil MY, Thomas P, Brandt C, Melzer F, Subbaiyan A, Chaudhuri P, Harmsen D, Jolley KA, Janowicz A, Garofolo G, Neubauer H, Pletz MW. 2022. Core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for improved characterization and epidemiological surveillance of pathogenic Brucella. J Clin Microbiol 60:e0031122. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00311-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Seemann T. 2024. Tseemann/abricate. Perl
  • 35. Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. 2019. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2014. The harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. 2019. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35:4453–4455. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Letunic I, Bork P. 2016. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W242–5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. bvalot . 2024. pyMLST
  • 40. Zhou Z, Alikhan NF, Sergeant MJ, Luhmann N, Vaz C, Francisco AP, Carriço JA, Achtman M. 2018. GrapeTree: visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome Res 28:1395–1404. doi: 10.1101/gr.232397.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Shome R, Kalleshamurthy T, Rathore Y, Ramanjinappa KD, Skariah S, Nagaraj C, Mohandoss N, Sahay S, Shome BR, Kuralayanapalya P S, Roy P, Hemadri D. 2021. Spatial sero-prevalence of brucellosis in small ruminants of India: nationwide cross-sectional study for the year 2017-2018. Transbound Emerg Dis 68:2199–2208. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. He Y. 2012. Analyses of Brucella pathogenesis, host immunity, and vaccine targets using systems biology and bioinformatics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:2. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Celli J. 2006. Surviving inside a macrophage: the many ways of Brucella. Res Microbiol 157:93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ke Y, Wang Y, Li W, Chen Z. 2015. Type IV secretion system of Brucella spp. and its effectors. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 5:72. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Coronas-Serna JM, Louche A, Rodríguez-Escudero M, Roussin M, Imbert PRC, Rodríguez-Escudero I, Terradot L, Molina M, Gorvel JP, Cid VJ, Salcedo SP. 2020. The TIR-domain containing effectors BtpA and BtpB from Brucella abortus impact NAD metabolism. PLoS Pathog 16:e1007979. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Anbazhagan S, Himani KM, Karthikeyan R, Prakasan L, Dinesh M, Nair SS, Lalsiamthara JAbhishek kkRamachandra SG, Chaturvedi VK, Chaudhuri P, Thomas P. 2023. Comparative genomics of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis unravels the gene sharing, virulence factors and SNP diversity among the standard, vaccine and field strains. Int Microbiol 27:101–111. doi: 10.1007/s10123-023-00374-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Dadar M, Alamian S, Brangsch H, Elbadawy M, Elkharsawi AR, Neubauer H, Wareth G. 2023. Determination of virulence-associated genes and antimicrobial resistance profiles in Brucella isolates recovered from humans and animals in Iran using NGS technology. Pathogens 12:82. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12010082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Whatmore AM. 2009. Current understanding of the genetic diversity of Brucella, an expanding genus of zoonotic pathogens. Infect Genet Evol 9:1168–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Yan S, Zhang W, Li C, Liu X, Zhu L, Chen L, Yang B. 2021. Serotyping, MLST, and core genome MLST analysis of Salmonella enterica from different sources in China during 2004-2019. Front Microbiol 12:688614. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.688614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Wareth G, Linde J, Nguyen NH, Nguyen TNM, Sprague LD, Pletz MW, Neubauer H. 2021. WGS-based analysis of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Vietnam and molecular characterization of antimicrobial determinants and MLST in Southeast Asia. Antibiotics (Basel) 10:563. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Pisarenko SV, Kovalev DA, Volynkina AS, Ponomarenko DG, Rusanova DV, Zharinova NV, Khachaturova AA, Tokareva LE, Khvoynova IG, Kulichenko AN. 2018. Global evolution and phylogeography of Brucella melitensis strains. BMC Genomics 19:353. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4762-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Sankarasubramanian J, Vishnu US, Sridhar J, Gunasekaran P, Rajendhran J. 2015. Pan-genome of Brucella species. Indian J Microbiol 55:88–101. doi: 10.1007/s12088-014-0486-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Janowicz A, De Massis F, Ancora M, Cammà C, Patavino C, Battisti A, Prior K, Harmsen D, Scholz H, Zilli K, Sacchini L, Di Giannatale E, Garofolo G. 2018. Core genome multilocus sequence typing and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis in the epidemiology of Brucella melitensis infections. J Clin Microbiol 56:e00517-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00517-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. De Massis F, Ali RM, Serrani S, Toro M, Sferrella A, D’Aurelio N, Janowicz A, Zilli K, Romualdi T, Felicioni E, Salman MH, Fahdel DH, Rashid HS, Ameen BQ, Garofolo G. 2024. Genetic diversity of Brucella melitensis isolated from domestic ruminants in Iraq. Microorganisms 12:475. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Toft C, Andersson SGE. 2010. Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 11:465–475. doi: 10.1038/nrg2798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Moran NA. 2002. Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell 108:583–586. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00665-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Andersson SG, Kurland CG. 1998. Reductive evolution of resident genomes. Trends Microbiol 6:263–268. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01312-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Tamas I, Klasson L, Canbäck B, Näslund AK, Eriksson A-S, Wernegreen JJ, Sandström JP, Moran NA, Andersson SGE. 2002. 50 million years of genomic stasis in endosymbiotic bacteria. Science 296:2376–2379. doi: 10.1126/science.1071278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Batut J, Andersson SGE, O’Callaghan D. 2004. The evolution of chronic infection strategies in the alpha-proteobacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:933–945. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Suárez-Esquivel M, Chaves-Olarte E, Moreno E, Guzmán-Verri C. 2020. Brucella genomics: macro and micro evolution. IJMS 21:7749. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. spectrum.02647-24-s0001.docx.

Core genome sequence types and geographic distribution of Brucella melitensis isolates.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02647-24.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

The Whole Genome Sequences of the study isolates have been deposited in GenBank with relevant metadata under accession nos. JAYWOX000000000, JAYWOY000000000, JAYWOZ000000000, JAYWPA000000000, JAYWPB000000000, JAYWPC000000000, JAYWPD000000000, JAYWPF000000000, JAYWPG000000000, JAYWPH000000000, JAYWPI000000000, JAYWPJ000000000, JAYWPK000000000, JAYWPL000000000, JAYWPM000000000, JAYWPN000000000, JAYWPK000000000, JAYWPO000000000, JAYWPP000000000, JAYWPQ000000000, JAYWPR000000000, JAYWPS000000000 and JAYWPT000000000.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES