Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2025 May 13:2025.05.12.25327223. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2025.05.12.25327223

Artificial Intelligence in Outpatient Primary Care: A Scoping Review on Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Stacy Iannone, Amarpreet Kaur, Kevin B Johnson
PMCID: PMC12132145  PMID: 40463551

ABSTRACT

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize clinical decision-making and significantly improve patient outcomes in outpatient primary care. AI technologies, including machine learning, deep learning, and transformers, enhance diagnostic accuracy, risk prediction, personalized treatment, workflow efficiency, clinical documentation, and continuous patient monitoring. However, despite rapid advancements, the extent of AI implementation in outpatient primary care remains unclear. This scoping review explores how AI functions, undergoes trials or integrates into non-urgent outpatient primary care settings.

Methods

This scoping review follows PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (ScR) guidelines. We searched five databases, including published and gray literature, to identify studies published between January 1, 2019, and November 22, 2024, using AI and primary care-related terms. We used Covidence, a web-based systematic review tool, to screen titles, abstracts, and full texts of English-language manuscripts. We then extracted data and categorized studies by research phase and AI application in primary care.

Results

We screened 3,203 manuscripts and found 61 met the eligibility criteria. Most studies (26) focused on model development, while only eight reported clinical trial results. AI applications included provider support (5) and radiological disease diagnosis (1). Most studies examined clinical decision-making, disease diagnosis, and risk prediction, but none addressed provider cognitive support, workflow automation, or risk-adjusted paneling. Despite AI’s potential, real-world implementation remains limited.

Conclusion

AI in primary care remains in the developmental stage, with minimal real-world use beyond ambient scribing, clinical decision support, and workflow automation. Researchers must collaborate with professional societies and industry partners to accelerate adoption, expand clinical trials, enhance AI education for providers and patients, facilitate model deployment, and conduct periodic assessments of real-world AI adoption trends to guide future integration.

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES