Abstract
The conditions for a stable polymorphism and the equilibrium gene frequency in an infinite population are compared when there is spatial or temporal environmental heterogeneity for the absolute dominance model. For temporal variation the conditions for stability are more restrictive and the equilibrium gene frequency is often at a low gene frequency. In a finite population, temporal environmental heterogeneity for the absolute dominance model was found to be quite ineffective in maintaining genetic variation and is often less effective than no selection at all. For comparison, the maximum maintenance for temporal variation is related to the overdominant model. In general, cyclic environmental variation was found to be more effective at maintaining genetic variation than where the environment varies stochastically. The importance of temporal environmental variation and the maintenance of genetic variation is discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (759.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bijlsma-Meeles E., Van Delden W. Intra- and interpopulation selection concerning the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1974 Feb 8;247(5440):369–371. doi: 10.1038/247369a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DEMPSTER E. R. Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955;20:25-31; discussion, 31-2. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1955.020.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen L. Random selective advantages of genes and their probabilities of fixation. Genet Res. 1973 Jun;21(3):215–219. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300013409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson F. M., Schaffer H. E., Gillaspy J. E., Rockwood E. S. Isozyme genotype-environment relationships in natural populations of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus, from Texas. Biochem Genet. 1969 Oct;3(5):429–450. doi: 10.1007/BF00485604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura M. Process Leading to Quasi-Fixation of Genes in Natural Populations Due to Random Fluctuation of Selection Intensities. Genetics. 1954 May;39(3):280–295. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.3.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koehn R. K. Esterase heterogeneity: dynamics of a polymorphism. Science. 1969 Feb 28;163(3870):943–944. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3870.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kojima K., Smouse P., Yang S., Nair P. S., Brncic D. Isozyme frequency patterns in Drosophila pavani associated with geographical and seasonal variables. Genetics. 1972 Dec;72(4):721–731. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.4.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levinton J. Genetic variation in a gradient of environmental variability: marine bivalvia (Mollusca). Science. 1973 Apr 6;180(4081):75–76. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4081.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powell J. R. Genetic polymorphisms in varied environments. Science. 1971 Dec 3;174(4013):1035–1036. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4013.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROBERTSON A. Selection for heterozygotes in small populations. Genetics. 1962 Sep;47:1291–1300. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.9.1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Jong G., Hoorn A. J., Thörig G. E., Scharloo W. Frequencies of amylase variants in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1972 Aug 25;238(5365):453–454. doi: 10.1038/238453a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]