Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1975 Jan;79(1):97–111. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.1.97

Genetic Organization and Adaptive Response of Allozymes to Ecological Variables in FUNDULUS HETEROCLITUS

Jeffry B Mitton 1,2, Richard K Koehn 1,2
PMCID: PMC1213263  PMID: 1126624

Abstract

Populations of Fundulus heteroclitus, (Cyprinodontidae) a widespread coastal marine fish, were studied in control and artificially heated environments on the North Shore of Long Island, New York to determine (1) patterns of variation in biochemical phenotypes and (2) the extent to which this variation reflected adaptation to environmental characteristics.—Variation at three of twelve polymorphic isoenzyme loci from the warm water population was beyond the range of variation among control populations, and resembled those determined for populations living at more southern latitudes. Hence, these differences were interpreted as adaptations to warm environments. Significant differences in allele frequencies and zygotic proportions at ten of twelve isoenzyme loci were found associated with differences in environments, sexes, and/or age classes. These data strongly support the view that protein polymorphisms are adaptive.—Several observations suggested that selection acts upon multilocus phenotypes rather than upon those of single loci. Several di-locus phenotypic distributions were demonstrated to be nonrandom, and those that exhibited similar patterns of dependence over years were postulated to be maintained by selection. Highly heterozygous fish exhibited superior viability when cohorts were compared over successive years.—The consequences of the polygynous mating system in this species for maintaining genetic variation and for allowing rapid evolutionary response to a variable environment are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (884.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allard R. W., Babbel G. R., Clegg M. T., Kahler A. L. Evidence for coadaptation in Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Oct;69(10):3043–3048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.10.3043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BENNETT J. H. ESTIMATION OF THE FREQUENCIES OF LINKED GENE PAIRS IN RANDOM MATING POPULATIONS. Am J Hum Genet. 1965 Jan;17:51–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhattacharya C. G. A simple method of resolution of a distribution into gaussian components. Biometrics. 1967 Mar;23(1):115–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clegg M. T., Allard R. W., Kahler A. L. Is the gene the unit of selection? Evidence from two experimental plant populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2474–2478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clegg M. T., Allard R. W. Patterns of Genetic Differentiation in the Slender Wild Oat Species Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jul;69(7):1820–1824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.7.1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Franklin I., Lewontin R. C. Is the gene the unit of selection? Genetics. 1970 Aug;65(4):707–734. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.4.707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koehn R. K. Esterase heterogeneity: dynamics of a polymorphism. Science. 1969 Feb 28;163(3870):943–944. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3870.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mitton J. B., Koehn R. K. Population genetics of marine pelecypods. 3. Epistasis between functionally related isoenzymes of Mytilus edulis. Genetics. 1973 Mar;73(3):487–496. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.3.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sved J. A., Reed T. E., Bodmer W. F. The number of balanced polymorphisms that can be maintained in a natural population. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):469–481. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Taylor C. E., Mitton J. B. Multivariate analysis of genetic variation. Genetics. 1974 Mar;76(3):575–585. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.3.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tinkle D. W., Selander R. K. Age-dependent allozymic variation in a natural population of lizards. Biochem Genet. 1973 Mar;8(3):231–237. doi: 10.1007/BF00486175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tracey M. L., Ayala F. J. Genetic load in natural populations: is it compatible with the hypothesis that many polymorphisms are maintained by natural selection? Genetics. 1974 Jul;77(3):569–589. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.3.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Whitt G. S. Genetic variation of supernatant and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase isozymes in the teleost Fundulus heteroclitus. Experientia. 1970;26(7):734–736. doi: 10.1007/BF02232514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Workman P. L., Niswander J. D. Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Am J Hum Genet. 1970 Jan;22(1):24–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES