Skip to main content
São Paulo Medical Journal logoLink to São Paulo Medical Journal
. 2025 May 30;143(4):e2024104. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0104.R1.07032025

Selenium intake, food sources, and associated factors in Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil): a cross-sectional study

Elen Cintia Vale Pedro I, Jéssica Levy II, Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni III, Isabela Judith Martins Bensenor IV
PMCID: PMC12133198  PMID: 40465955

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Selenium is essential to human health. There are few reports on the analysis of selenium intake in the Brazilian population; however, data have shown that Brazilian are in the deficient range of consumption.

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to identify the major foods that contribute to dietary selenium and determine the socioeconomic and lifestyle factors associated with selenium intake.

DESIGN AND SETTING:

This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

METHODS:

Selenium consumption was evaluated using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) developed and validated for the ELSA-Brasil. To determine the contribution of selenium consumption, each food item was divided by the total selenium intake of the population. Associations between selenium intake (mg/day, dependent variable) and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors (predictors) were tested using multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS:

The sample comprised 14,780 participants, most of whom were adults (78.5%). Individuals with income ≥ 3 minimum wages were mostly concentrated in the 5th quintile of selenium consumption; positive and significant correlations were found between selenium intake and female sex, age ≥ 60 years, income ≥ 3 minimum wages, higher or postgraduate education, alcohol consumption, and moderate physical activity level. Nuts and fish contributed the most to dietary selenium.

CONCLUSION:

Nuts, meat, and fish contributed the most to the dietary intake of selenium, and selenium intake was associated with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors among the evaluated individuals.

KEYWORDS (MeSH terms): Nutritional sciences, Selenium, Eating, Socioeconomic factors, Lifestyle

AUTHOR’S KEYWORDS: Selenium intake, Food sources, Nutrient intake

INTRODUCTION

Selenium (Se) is an essential mineral for human health; after iodine, it is the second most important nutrient for proper functioning of the thyroid. 1 It acts as a cofactor of more than 25 selenoproteins and selenoenzymes, which are involved in diverse physiological processes. 2 Unlike other minerals, selenium is incorporated into proteins by means of a co-translational mechanism as part of the amino acid selenocysteine (SeCys), the 21st proteinogenic amino acid in humans. 3

Daily intake of selenium is necessary to maintain natural metabolism and homeostasis in the human body. The known biological functions of selenium in the human body include defense against oxidative stress, regulation of thyroid hormone, protection against oxidative damage, reducing the risk of chronic non-communicable diseases, and increasing resistance of the immune system in the form of selenoproteins. 4

The Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of selenium for both men and women is 55 μg/day. The Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) of selenium for adults is set at 400 μg/day to prevent selenosis caused by high intake of selenium. 5 Selenium consumption is mostly dependent on the food content and dietary supplements. 6 Fruits and vegetables, in general, have a low content of this micronutrient. 7,8,9

The concentration of selenium in food depends on the content of selenium present in the soil in which the plants is grown; thus, the concentration of selenium in food varies worldwide. There are few reports on the analyses of selenium in Brazilian soils; however, data have shown that many soils are in the deficient range. 10,11,12,13

Few food items such as Brazilian nuts and kidney beef are considered the best sources of selenium. 14 In addition to these, selenium is present in beef, chicken, fish, dairy products, and eggs. 7,8,15,16 In regions with soil containing adequate selenium, wheat represents a good source, and thus, consumption of breads and cereals can contribute to the nutrient intake. 6,17,18,19

Many studies show that personal factors, such as sex, age, physical activity level, and socioeconomic factors based on income and education, may affect the food consumption of a person or population. 20,21 People from lower socioeconomic background have a higher incidence of premature death, heart diseases, and cancer than those from socioeconomically advantaged groups. 22,23,24 In Brazil, the consumption of milk, fish, lean meat, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains is positively related to family income, 25 which may influence selenium intake in the Brazilian population.

OBJECTIVE

Thus, this study aimed to identify the main foods that contribute to the dietary consumption of selenium and to determine the socioeconomic and lifestyle factors associated with selenium intake among participants of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

METHODS

Study design and population

This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the ELSA-Brasil, which is a multicenter cohort study focused on the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in the Brazilian population. 26,27 This cohort involved 15,105 participants of both sexes, aged 35–74 years at baseline, recruited between August 2008 and December 2010. 26,27 Detailed methodological information and baseline data have been published elsewhere. 26,27 We excluded participants without food consumption information (n = 24) and individuals below the 1st percentile and above the 99th percentile of the total energy intake estimates (n = 301) to exclude possibly invalid food intake data. The final sample comprised 14,780 participants. The ELSA-Brasil was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of each institution where the project was conducted.

Food consumption assessment

To evaluate the habitual consumption of participants in the last 12 months, a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed and validated for the ELSA-Brasil. 28 This semi quantitative FFQ designed by the ELSA-Brasil had 114 food items and was answered by interview. The FFQ used the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2010) for data analysis. Participants were asked at the end of the FFQ if they had changed their dietary intake in the past six months, and if the answer was “yes,” the participant would inform reason for changes in their dietary habits. Individuals who did not have any dietary data or who did not have a plausible daily caloric intake (< 500 or > 6,000 kcal) were excluded.

The proportion of selenium in diet was calculated based on the consumption of all foods containing this nutrient. Selenium intake was adjusted for the total energy intake using the residue method 29 to reduce errors associated with food consumption measurements, and the total selenium intake was divided into quintiles (1st quintile = lowest intake; 5th quintile = highest intake). Energy-adjusted values were used for stratification of quantiles and linear regression analyses.

Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors

At baseline, data was collected from interviews, anthropometric measurements, and clinical examinations. 26 Socioeconomic and lifestyle variables were selected based on previous studies that addressed these determinants of food intake in the Brazilian adult population. 21,30 Accordingly, we selected sex, age, schooling, income, self-reported skin color, smoking and alcohol habits, nutritional status, and physical activity level as variables in this study. 31

The participants were classified according to sex as male and female and according to age as adult (34–59 years) and older (≥ 60 years). We categorized schooling as “complete elementary school,” “complete high school,” and “higher education or postgraduate.” To classify the family income per capita, we calculated it as equivalent to the average minimum wage between 2008 and 2010 (R$ 463.33) and then stratified into < 3 or ≥ 3 minimum wages. Self-reported skin color was categorized as “white” and “not white”. 32

Alcohol consumption was measured in grams of ethanol per week as informed in the FFQ, and participants were classified into two categories: current and past alcohol intake. We evaluated smoking status using a semi-structured questionnaire on smoking habits at the time of interview and at a predetermined time in the past. Based on these questions, participants were categorized as “non-smokers,” “former smokers,” or “current smokers.”

To assess the nutritional status of participants, we considered the body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (kg/m2) and classified according to the World Health Organization criteria defined as: low weight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), and obesity (≥ 30 kg/m2). 33 Physical activity level was evaluated based on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), 34,35 and categorized as light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity level at leisure time. 36 In this study, we considered physical activity level during leisure time only because it was better related to sociodemographic variables, such as schooling, income, sex, and age, 37 used in epidemiological studies. 38

Statistical analysis

Energy-adjusted selenium consumption was stratified into quintiles to better represent dietary selenium ranking. Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were described as frequencies and percentages according to the lowest (1st quintile) and highest (5th quintile) levels of selenium intake and sex of the participants. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to verify differences between groups.

To measure the proportion of food contributing to selenium intake, we used the methodology proposed by Block et al. 39 Aiming to obtain the contribution of food in selenium consumption, each food item was divided by the total population selenium intake. Food items were listed as major contributors according to their contribution rankings. 40

Associations between energy-adjusted selenium intake (mg/day, dependent variable) and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors (predictors) were tested by multiple linear regression analyses using the stepwise backward method.

The energy-adjusted selenium intake variable approaches normality based on the results of the Shapiro-Wilk test and visual inspection of histograms and Q-Q plots, thus meeting this assumption for multiple linear regression. The multivariable model was further adjusted for self-reported changes in dietary habits over the past six months (yes or no) and supplement use (no, regular, or not regular). Since we did not have information about the presence of selenium in supplements, we adjusted the multivariable model for the use of supplements. Since information regarding the use of supplements was self-reported, we cannot exclude the possibility of memory bias. All analyses were performed using the Stata® (version 14) software, assuming a statistical significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

Our sample consisted of 14,780 participants, mostly adults (78.5%), females (54.5%), non-smokers (57.1%), self-reported as white (52.5%), and with higher education status (53%). Regarding the nutritional status of the participants, 35.9% were classified as normal weight, 40.3% were overweight, and 22.9% were obese. The distribution of sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics according to the selenium intake of all individuals is presented in Table 1 and those stratified by sex are presented in Table 2. Individuals with income ≥ 3 minimum wages as well as men and women with higher education were mostly concentrated in the 5th quintile of selenium consumption (Table 2), whereas those who self-reported as white, who practice light physical activity, who were non-smokers and alcohol consumption had selenium intake levels in the last quintile (Table 2).

Table 1. Distribution of sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of the study population according to the selenium intake quintiles. ELSA-Brasil, 2008–2010.

Characteristic N % P
Age, years < 0.001
Adult 11.598 78.47
Elderly 3.182 21.53
Body mass index, kg/m 2 < 0.001
Less than 18.5 139 0.94
18.5 to 24.9 5.309 35.93
25 to 30 5.946 40.25
More than 30 3.386 22.88
Self-reported race < 0.001
White 7.665 52.46
Not White 6.947 47.54
Education level < 0.001
Complete primary education 1.852 12.53
Complete high school 5.094 34.47
Higher education or postgraduate 7.834 53
Income < 0.001
< 3SM 7.370 49,86
3SM 7.410 50,14
Smoking < 0.001
Non-smoker 8.434 57.07
Former smoker 4.429 29.97
Current smoker 1.916 12.96
Alcohol intake < 0.001
Past 2.969 22.5
Current 10.224 77.5
Leisure-time physical activity < 0.001
Light 11.437 77.04
Moderate 2.029 13.93
Vigorous 1.314 09.02

Selenium intake quintiles range from 32.44 mcg/day (minimum) to 1099.34 mcg/day (maximum). Values are presented as absolute numbers (n) or percentages (%). Differences between groups were tested using the Pearson’s chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Table 2. Sociodemographic and lifestyle data according to selenium intake stratified by sex. ELSA-Brasil, 2008–2010.

Characteristic Selenium intake (quintiles)
Male Female
1º Q 5º Q P 1º Q 5º Q P
Selenium quintiles (mcg/day, min-max) 35.77–105.04 223.06–1054.91 32.44–105.05 223–1099.34
Age (n, %) < 0.001 < 0.001
Adult 1.368 80.7 934 71.03 1.059 81.68 1.203 73.31
Elderly 291 17.54 381 28.97 238 18.35 438 26.69
BMI (n, %) 0.003 < 0.001
Less than 18.5 23 1.39 8 0.61 10 0.77 18 1.1
18.5 to 24.9 566 34.14 472 35.92 467 36.3 719 48.81
25 to 30 719 43.37 608 46.27 463 35.73 555 38.82
More than 30 350 21.11 226 17.2 356 27.47 349 21.27
Self-reported race (n, %) < 0.001 < 0.001
White 693 42.33 879 68.14 497 38.53 997 61.35
Not White 944 57.67 411 31.86 793 61.47 628 38.65
Education level (n, %) < 0.001 < 0.001
Complete primary education 430 25.92 80 06.08 219 16.89 68 4.14
Complete high school 753 45.39 230 17.49 634 48.88 359 21.88
Higher education or postgraduate 479 28.69 1.005 76.43 444 34.23 1.214 73.98
Income (n, %) < 0.001 < 0.001
< 3SM 1.160 69,92 359 27.3 901 69.47 476 29.01
3SM 499 30,08 956 72.7 396 30.53 1.165 70.99
Smoking (n, %) < 0.001 < 0.001
Non-smoker 777 46.84 702 53,38 778 59.98 983 59.9
Former smoker 559 33.69 475 36.12 307 23.67 504 30.71
Current smoker 323 19.47 138 10.49 212 16.35 154 9.38
Alcohol intake (n, %) < 0.001 < 0.001
Past 374 23.94 190 15 303 29.94 294 20.01
Current 1.188 76.06 1.077 85 709 70.06 1.175 79.99
Leisure-time physical activity (n, %) < 0.001 < 0.001
Light 1.289 79.08 831 63.92 1.117 87.61 1.192 73.76
Moderate 207 12.7 243 18.69 110 8.63 265 16.4
Vigorous 134 8.22 226 17.38 48 3.76 159 9.84

A chi-square test was conducted considering all quintiles of selenium intake; however, for better interpretation and data presentation, only the extremes (1st and 5th quintiles) are included in this table. The P values refer to the analysis considering all quintiles. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

The top 10 foods contributing to selenium intake for all participants are described in Table 3. Nuts were the largest contributor (28.9%), followed by cooked fish (8.6%), boneless meat (7.7%), French bread (6.9%), white rice (5.7%), fried fish (3.9%), spaghetti (3.5%), whole-grain bread (2.5%), light bread (2.2%), and whole milk (0.2%) (Table 3).

Table 3. Main food sources of selenium intake. ELSA-Brasil, 2008–2010.

Rank Food PC SD 95% confidence interval
1st Nuts 28.95 0.82 27.35; 30.56
2nd Cooked fish 8.63 0.1 8.43; 8.83
3rd Boneless meat 7.66 0.08 7.52; 7.81
4th French bread 6.97 0.06 6.85; 7.1
5th White rice 5.72 0.04 5.65; 5.8
6th Fried fish 3.91 0.06 3.79; 4.03
7th Spaghetti 3.53 0.04 3.46; 3.6
8th Whole-grain bread 2.54 0.04 2.50; 2.62
9th Light bread 2.2 0.03 2.15; 2.59
10th Whole milk 02.03 0.03 1.98; 2.08

Nuts include Brazilian nuts, peanuts, cashew nuts, walnuts, and almonds.

PC, percentage contribution; SD, standard deviation.

Regarding the contributing foods stratified by sex, there was a difference only from the sixth-ranked foods (Table 4). Except nutritional status, all sociodemographic and lifestyle variables investigated were dependent on selenium intake (Table 5). As shown in Table 4, positive and significant correlations were found between intake of selenium and the following factors: female sex, age ≥ 60 years, income ≥ 3 minimum wages, complete high school and higher or postgraduate education levels, alcohol consumption, and moderate and vigorous physical activity levels. In contrast, smoking and “not white” skin color were negatively associated with selenium intake (Table 5).

Table 4. Main food sources of selenium intake by stratified by sex. ELSA-Brasil 2008–2010.

Rank Food PC SD 95% confidence interval
Men
1st Nuts 26.88 1.43 24.07; 29.69
2nd Cooked fish 8.5 0.15 8.21; 8.78
3rd Boneless meat 8.12 0.12 7.89; 8.35
4th French bread 7.74 0.09 7.55; 7.93
5th White rice 6.79 0.06 6.67; 6.9
6th Fried fish 4.31 0.09 4.13; 4.5
7th Spaghetti 3.88 0.06 3.76; 4
8th Bean 2.44 0.03 2.38; 2.49
9th Whole milk 2.08 0.04 2; 2.16
10th Whole-grain bread 1.97 0.05 1.86; 2.07
Women
1st Nuts 30.98 0.81 29.39; 32.57
2nd Cooked fish 8.76 0.14 8.49; 9.02
3rd Boneless meat 7.22 0.09 7.03; 7.4
4th French bread 6.22 0.08 6.06; 6.38
5th White rice 4.68 0.04 4.60; 4.75
6th Spaghetti 3.18 0.04 3.10; 3.25
7th Whole-grain bread 3.11 0.06 2.99; 3.22
8th Light bread 2.79 0.04 2.71; 2.88
9th Oat 2.12 0.04 2.04; 2.19
10th Cooked chicken 2.05 0.04 1.98; 2.12

Nuts include Brazilian nuts, peanuts, cashew nuts, walnuts, and almonds.

PC, percentage contribution; SD, standard deviation.

Table 5. Multiple linear regression model between selenium intake and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. ELSA-Brasil, 2008–2010.

Predictors ß 95% confidence interval P
Sex (reference: male)
Female 6.01 2.51; 9.5 < 0.001
Age group (reference: adults)
Older people 12.85 8.54; 17.16 < 0.001
Self-reported skin color (reference: white)
Non-white (-8.66) (-12.31; -5.01) < 0.001
Education level (reference: complete primary school)
Complete high school 7.22 1.28; 13.16 0.017
Higher education or postgraduate 33.34 26.96; 39.71 < 0.001
Income per capita (reference: < 3 minimum salaries)
≥ 3 minimum wages 23.95 19.75; 28.14 < 0.001
Smoking (reference: non-smoker)
Former smoker 6.29 2.43; 10.16 0.001
Current smoker (-7,77) (-13.02; -2.53) 0.004
Alcohol (reference: non-consumer)
Current consumption 4.38 0.19; 8.56 0.040
Nutritional status (reference: normal weight)
Low weight (-9.47) (-27.67; 8.73) 0.308
Overweight (-11.84) (-30.04; 6.36) 0.202
Obesity (-14.7) (-33.07; 3.68) 0.117
Physical activity level (reference: light)
Moderate 10.03 5.02; 15.04 < 0.001
Vigorous 15.52 9.57; 21.48 < 0.001

DISCUSSION

In this study, we identified food sources that were major contributors to the total selenium intake, which included nuts, cooked fish, boneless meat, French bread, and white rice among ELSA-Brasil participants (2008–2010). The nuts consumed included Brazilian nuts (52.6%), peanuts (18.8%), cashew nuts (15%), walnuts (6.8%), and almonds (6.8%). Brazilian nuts represent the largest fraction of nut consumption, which justifies their high selenium concentration and consumption. These foods are part of regular food consumption of Brazilian families, except nuts, owing to their high cost, and meat in individuals from lower socioeconomic classes. In addition, nuts consumption is not common in most regions of Brazil being not a part of the Brazilian eating habits, representing only 0.2% of the total calories consumed per day. 41 A cross-sectional population-based study aimed to identify foods contributing to mineral intake among residents in urban areas of São Paulo revealed that white rice, meat, and bread were the main foods contributing to selenium intake. 16

Many people rarely eat foods that are good sources of selenium, such as Brazilian nuts, the richest dietary source of selenium. 7,8,13,15 However, bread and cereals are commonly consumed and make a substantial contribution to selenium intake, followed by animal products. Ferreira et al. 42 evaluated the selenium content of various foods consumed in the country from different regions and found that the staple foods in the Brazilian diet, such as white rice, beans, wheat flour, corn flour, and cassava flour, contained low levels of this mineral. Significant amount of selenium was present only in meat (both beef and fish). These findings indicate that the Brazilian population is susceptible to selenium deficiency, which is further aggravated among lower-income individuals as they have restricted access to animal foods.

Socioeconomic characteristics, such as sex, age, race/ethnicity, education level, and income, can influence selenium intake among the ELSA-Brasil participants. Dietary selenium intake is higher in older people than in adults, and there is a positive association between age and micronutrient consumption. This observation may reflect healthier diet consumed by older people to minimize age-related disorders, as described by Andrade. 43

In our analysis, women had a high selenium intake, which might be due to better care of diet quality by women than men. A multi-national study including participants from 23 countries revealed that women focus more on healthy eating habits than do men, and that health beliefs explain a large proportion of dietary behavior. 44 Several other studies conducted in Brazil and other countries also found a better dietary profile in women. 44,45,46,47 In addition, women with normal weight (BMI: 18.5–24.9 kg/m2) had a high intake of dietary selenium, reflecting better diet profile adopted by women and their concern about diet quality. A similar study with the same sample from the ELSA-Brasil found a greater consumption of antioxidants, such as vitamins A and E and selenium, by females. 48

Regarding ethnicity-based dietary differences, individuals who self-reported as “white” (52.5%) had a high intake of dietary selenium. According to our findings, selenium intake, based on the NHANES III 24-h dietary recall, was slightly higher among Whites than Blacks. 49 Racial variations in selenium status has been reported in previous studies as well. 49,50,51,52 Non-white population experiences significant disparities in selenium intake, which may be linked to both socioeconomic factors and lack of nutritional knowledge. Previous studies suggest that lower consumption of selenium-rich foods is prevalent among Blacks than among Whites. 49,51,54 Selenium deficiency in this population is concerning as selenium plays a crucial role in antioxidant defense and cardiovascular health. 3,6

Limited nutritional education and access to resources have contributed to these disparities. Many individuals in underserved communities lack awareness of their specific dietary needs, including the importance of micronutrients, such as selenium, in preventing chronic diseases and supporting mental health. 3 This knowledge gap leads to poor dietary choices and exacerbates health risks. 24

High school education level is associated with a higher consumption of nutrients such as selenium. In our study, individuals with higher education levels or postgraduates were mostly concentrated in the 5th quintile of selenium consumption for men and women. Consistent with our observations, a previous study by Cardoso et al. 53 with the same ELSA-Brasil sample found that the consumption of a “healthy” diet characterized by fruit, vegetables, whole grains, and low sugar/low fat patterns were present in strikingly higher proportions among individuals with higher education levels.

Socioeconomic status has an important impact on the lifestyle of individuals by determining access to services, goods, and products, including food. Medina et al. 54 verified a better profile of food consumption in high-income and educated social groups. In our study, individuals with higher incomes were mostly concentrated in the 5th quintile of selenium consumption for both men and women, and there was a positive association between high income and consumption of this micronutrient. Although the consumption of selenium was higher in women, not all individuals who self-reported as “white” with high education and higher income had adequate consumption of selenium because the choice of foods in the diet may be determined by other reasons, such as family or personal preferences, availability of foods near home or place of work, seasonal foods, or knowledge about healthy and unhealthy foods.

Individuals who were former smokers, moderate and vigorous physical activity, and alcohol consumption were positively associated with selenium intake. The dietary habits of smokers are usually characterized by a lower intake of antioxidants such as selenium and fiber. 55,56 This suggests that these differences may contribute to the deleterious effects of tobacco smoke components on the risk of cancer and coronary heart disease. 56

In the present study, alcohol consumption was significantly higher among men and women in the 5th quintile of selenium consumption, and there was a positive correlation between current alcohol consumption and selenium intake. Alcohol consumption is usually accompanied by the consumption of protein snacks, such as meat and nuts, which contribute to the intake of foods rich in selenium. Isobe et al. 57 in a cohort study of 1,183 subjects observed that alcohol intake was associated with relatively selenium-rich foods such as seafood. The results from the NHANES 2003–2008 showed that men consumed more energy from meat and fish on drinking days than on non-drinking days. 58

A physically active lifestyle can modify eating habits. It has been suggested that physical activity could be a possible gateway for healthier eating and better food choices. 59,60 In our study, there was a positive correlation between light physical activity and selenium intake.

In this study, foods that contributed mostly to dietary selenium intake were nuts, meat, and fish among the individuals evaluated, and low intake of selenium was associated with the following conditions: male sex, low education, low income, non-white skin color, and younger age, indicating that the Brazilian population may be susceptible to selenium deficiency; public policies focused on the increased intake of foods rich in selenium must be directed specifically to groups with specific characteristics of low selenium intake.

CONCLUSION

Nuts, meat, and fish contributed the most to selenium intake in the diet. In addition, selenium intake was associated with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, such as sex, age group, education, income, ethnicity, smoking, and physical activity among the evaluated individuals.

Footnotes

Sources of funding: None

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schomburg L. Selenium, selenoproteins and the thyroid gland: interactions in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol [Internet] 2011;8(3):160–71. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Behne D, Pfiefer H, Rothlein D, Kyriakopoulos A. In: Trace elements in man and animals 10: proceedings of the tenth international symposium on trace elements in man and animals. Roussel AM, Favier A, Anderson RA, editors. New York: Plenum; 2000. Cellular and subcellular distribution of selenium and selenoproteins. In: pp. 29–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rayman MP. Selenium and human health. Lancet [Internet] 2012;379(9822):1256–68. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61452-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Geerling BJ, Badart-Smook A, Stockbrügger RW, Brummer RJ. Comprehensive nutritional status in recently diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease compared with population controls. Eur J Clin Nutr [Internet] 2000;54(6):514–21. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Dietary Antioxidants and Related Compounds . Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids [Internet]. Washington (DC):: National Academies;; 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Navarro-Alarcon M, Cabrera-Vique C. Selenium in food and the human body: a review. Sci Total Environ [Internet] 2008;400(1–3):115–41. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Klapec T, Mandic M, Grgic J, et al. Selenium in selected foods grown or purchased in eastern Croatia. Food Chem [Internet] 2004;85(3):445–52. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.07.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moatkhef F, Ismail H, Agamy N, Aborhyem S. Quantitative determination of selenium in the most common food items sold in Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc [Internet] 2020;95(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42506-020-00044-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ventura M, Stibilj V, Freitas MC, Pacheco AMG. Determination of ultratrace levels of selenium in fruit and vegetable samples grown and consumed in Portugal. Food Chem [Internet] 2009;115(1):200–6. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sigrist M, Brusa L, Campagnoli D, Beldoménico H. Determination of selenium in selected food samples from Argentina and estimation of their contribution to the Se dietary intake. Food Chem [Internet] 2012;134(4):1932–7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fichtner SS, Paula AN, Jardim EC, Silva EC, Lopes HOS. Estudo da composição mineral de solos, forragens e tecido animal de bovinos do município de Rio Verde, Goiás: cobre, molibdênio e selênio. [cited 2025 Apr 9];Pesq Agropec Trop [Internet]. 2007 Dec 3;20(1):1–6. Available from: https://revistas.ufg.br/pat/article/view/2582. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Faria LA. Levantamento sobre selênio em solos e plantas do estado de São Paulo e sua aplicação em plantas forrageiras [master’s thesis]. Pirassununga: Universidade de São Paulo/Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos; 2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lyons G, Stangoulis J, Graham R. High-selenium wheat: biofortification for better health. Nutr Res Rev [Internet] 2003;16(1):45–60. doi: 10.1079/nrr200255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cominetti C, Duarte GBS, Cozzolino SMF. Funções Plenamente Reconhecidas de Nutrientes: Selênio [Internet]. 2nd. Vol. 8. São Paulo: ILSI Brasil-Internacional Life Sciences Institute of Brazil; 2017. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://ilsibrasil.org/publication/funcoes-plenamente-reconhecidas/. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sager M. Selenium in agriculture, food, and nutrition. Pure Appl Chem [Internet] 2006;78(1):111–33. doi: 10.1351/pac200678010111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sales CH, Fontanelli MM, Vieira DA, Marchioni DM, Fisberg RM. Inadequate dietary intake of minerals: prevalence and association with socio-demographic and lifestyle factors. Br J Nutr [Internet] 2017;117(2):267–77. doi: 10.1017/s0007114516004633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ventura MG, Freitas MC, Pacheco A, van Meerten T, Wolterbeek HT. Selenium content in selected Portuguese foodstuffs. Eur Food Res Technol [Internet] 2007;224:395–401. doi: 10.1007/s00217-006-0426-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rayman MP. The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet [Internet] 2000;356(9225):233–41. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02490-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alissa EM, Bahijri SM, Ferns GA. The controversy surrounding selenium and cardiovascular disease: a review of the evidence. Med Sci Monit. 2003;9(1):RA9–RA18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Estima CCP, Philipp ST, Alvarenga MSSF. Fatores determinantes de consumo alimentar: por que os indivíduos comem o que comem? [cited 2024 Apr 1];Rev Bras Nutr Clin [Internet]. 2009 24(4):263–8. Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-549042. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jaime PC, Stopa SR, Oliveira TP, et al. Prevalence and sociodemographic distribution of healthy eating markers, National Health Survey, Brazil 2013. Epidemiol e Serv Saúde [Internet] 2015;24(2):267–76. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742015000200009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kreatsoulas C, Anand SS. The impact of social determinants on cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol [Internet] 2010;26(Suppl C):8C–13C. doi: 10.1016/S0828-282X(10)71075-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schultz WM, Kelli HM, Lisko JC, et al. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular outcomes: challenges and interventions. Circulation [Internet] 2018;137(20):2166–78. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.029652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rosengren A, Smyth A, Rangarajan S, et al. Socioeconomic status and risk of cardiovascular disease in 20 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiologic (PURE) study. Lancet Glob Health [Internet] 2019;7(6):e748–e760. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30045-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística . Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares 2008–2009: análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2011. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?id=250063&view=detalhes. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Aquino EM, Barreto SM, Bensenor IJM, et al. Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil): objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol [Internet] 2012;175(4):315–24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Mill JG, et al. Cohort profile: Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) Int J Epidemiol [Internet] 2015;44(1):68–75. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Molina MDCB, Bensenor IJM, Cardoso LO, et al. Reproducibility and relative validity of the Food Frequency Questionnaire used in the ELSA-Brasil. Cad Saude Publica [Internet] 2013;29(2):379–89. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2013000200024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. pp. 768–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Olinto MT, Willett WC, Gigante DP, Victora CG. Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics in relation to dietary patterns among young Brazilian adults. Public Health Nutr [Internet] 2011;14(1):150–9. doi: 10.1017/s136898001000162x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bensenor IJM, Griep RH, Pinto KA, et al. Routines of organization of clinical tests and interviews in the ELSA-Brasil investigation center. Rev Saude Publica [Internet] 2013;47(Suppl 2):37–47. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Petruccelli JL, Saboia AL. Pesquisa sobre as características étnico-raciais da população [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=284235. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.World Health Organization . Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2014. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564854. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc [Internet] 2003;35(8):1381–95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hallal PC, Victora CG. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Med Sci Sports Exerc [Internet] 2004;36(3):556. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000117161.66394.07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Matsudo S, Araújo T, Matsudo V, et al. Questionário internacional de atividade física (IPAQ): estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde [Internet] 2001;6(2):5–18. doi: 10.12820/rbafs.v.6n2p5-18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lindström M, Hanson BS, Ostergren PO. Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: the role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med [Internet] 2001;52(3):441–51. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00153-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Monteiro CA, Conde WL, Matsudo SM, et al. A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity in Brazil, 1996–1997. Rev Panam Salud Publica [Internet] 2003;14(4):246–54. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892003000900005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Block G, Dresser CM, Hartman AM, Carroll MD. Nutrient sources in the American diet: Quantitative data from the NHANES II survey: II. Macronutrients and fats. Am J Epidemiol [Internet] 1985;122(1):27–40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Marchioni DML, Verly E, Steluti J, Cesar CLG, Fisberg M. Folic acid intake before and after mandatory fortification: a population-based study in São Paulo. Cad Saude Publica [Internet] 2013;29(10):2083–92. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00084712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística . Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2017–2018: Avaliação nutricional da disponibilidade domiciliar de alimentos no Brasil [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101742. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ferreira KS, Gomes JC, Bellato CR, Jordao CP. Selenium concentration in food consumed in Brazil. Rev Panam Salud Publica [Internet] 2002;11(3):172–7. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892002000300006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Andrade SC. Mudanças na qualidade da dieta e seus fatores associados em residentes do município de São Paulo em 2003–2008: estudo de base populacional [master’s thesis]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo; 2013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A, et al. Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann Behav Med [Internet] 2004;27(2):107–16. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Baker AH, Wardle J. Sex differences in fruit and vegetable intake in older adults. Appetite [Internet] 2003;40(3):269–75. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00014-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Brasil . Vigitel Brasil 2016: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico: estimativas sobre frequência e distribuição sociodemográfica de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas nas capitais dos 26 estados brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2016 [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde;; 2017. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/svsa/vigitel/vigitel-brasil-2016-fatores-risco.pdf/view. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Assumpção D, Domene SMÁ, Fisberg RM, Canesqui AM, Barros MBA. Diferenças entre homens e mulheres na qualidade da dieta: estudo de base populacional em Campinas, São Paulo. Ciên Saúde Colet [Internet] 2017;22(2):347–58. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017222.16962015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Teixeira MG, Mill JG, Pereira AC, Molina MdelC. Dietary intake of antioxidants in ELSA-Brasil population: baseline results. Rev Bras Epidemiol [Internet] 2016;19(1):149–59. doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201600010013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Niskar AS, Paschal DC, Kieszak SM, et al. Serum selenium levels in the US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Biol Trace Elem Res [Internet] 2003;91(1):1–10. doi: 10.1385/bter:91:1:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Goodman GE, Schaffer S, Bankson DD, et al. Predictors of serum selenium in cigarette smokers and the lack of association with lung and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev [Internet] 2001;10(10):1069–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McAdam PA, Smith DK, Feldman EB, Hames C. Effect of age, sex, and race on selenium status of healthy residents of Augusta, Georgia. Biol Trace Elem Res [Internet] 1984;6(1):3–9. doi: 10.1007/bf02918316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Willett WC, Polk BF, Morris JS, et al. Prediagnostic serum selenium and risk of cancer. Lancet [Internet] 1983;2(8342):130–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90116-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cardoso LO, Carvalho MS, Cruz OG, et al. Eating patterns in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil): an exploratory analysis. Cad Saude Publica [Internet] 2016;32(5):e00066215. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00066215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Medina LPB, Barros MBA, Sousa NFS, et al. Desigualdades sociais no perfil de consumo de alimentos da população brasileira: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol [Internet] 2019;22(Suppl 2):e190011.supl.2. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720190011.supl.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dallongeville J, Marecaux N, Fruchart JC, Amouyel P. Cigarette smoking is associated with unhealthy patterns of nutrient intake: a meta-analysis. J Nutr [Internet] 1998;128(9):1450–7. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.9.1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Northrop-Clewes CA, Thurnham DI. Monitoring micronutrients in cigarette smokers. Clin Chim Acta [Internet] 2007;377(1–2):14–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Isobe Y, Asakura H, Tsujiguchi H, et al. Alcohol intake is associated with elevated serum levels of selenium and selenoprotein P in humans. Front Nutr [Internet] 2021;8:633703. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.633703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Breslow RA, Chen CM, Graubard BI, Jacobovits T, Kant AK. Diets of drinkers on drinking and nondrinking days: NHANES 2003–2008. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet] 2013;97(5):1068–75. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.050161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tucker M, Reicks M. Exercise as a gateway behavior for healthful eating among older adults: an exploratory study. J Nutr Educ Behav [Internet] 2002;34(Suppl 1):S14–S19. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60306-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Blakely F, Dunnagan T, Haynes G, Moore S, Pelican S. Moderate physical activity and its relationship to select measures of a healthy diet. J Rural Health [Internet] 2004;20(2):160–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00023.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from São Paulo Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Associação Paulista de Medicina

RESOURCES