Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1975 Jun;80(2):267–296. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.2.267

Paternal Loss (PAL): A Meiotic Mutant in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Causing Loss of Paternal Chromosomes

Bruce S Baker 1
PMCID: PMC1213327  PMID: 805757

Abstract

The effects of a male-specific meiotic mutant, paternal loss (pal), in D. melanogaster have been examined genetically. The results indicate the following. (1) When homozygous in males, pal can cause loss, but not nondisjunction, of any chromosome pair. The pal-induced chromosome loss produces exceptional progeny that apparently failed to receive one, or more, paternal chromosomes and, in addition, mosaic progeny during whose early mitotic divisions one or more paternal chromosomes were lost. (2) Only paternally derived chromosomes are lost. (3) Mitotic chromosome loss can occur in homozygous pal+ progeny of pal males. (4) Chromosomes differ in their susceptibility to pal-induced loss. The site responsible for the insensitivity vs. sensitivity of the X chromosome to pal mapped to the basal region of the X chromosome at, or near, the centromere. From these results, it is suggested that pal+ acts in male gonia to specify a product that is a component of, or interacts with, the centromeric region of chromosomes and is necessary for the normal segregation of paternal chromosomes. In the presence of pal, defective chromosomes are produced and these chromosomes tend to get lost during the early cleavage divisions of the zygote. (5) The loss of heterologous chromosome pairs is not independent; there are more cases of simultaneous loss of two chromosomes than expected from independence. Moreover, an examination of cases of simultaneous somatic loss of two heterologs reveals an asymmetry in the early mitotic divisions of the zygote such that when two heterologs are lost at a somatic cleavage division, almost invariably one daughter nucleus fails to get either, and the other daughter nucleus receives its normal chromosome complement. It is suggested that this asymmetry is not a property of pal but is rather a normal process that is being revealed by the mutant. (6) The somatic loss of chromosomes in the progeny of pal males allows the construction of fate maps of the blastoderm. Similar fate maps are obtained using data from gynandromorphs and from marked Y chromosome (nonsexually dimorphic) mosaics.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker B. S., Carpenter A. T. Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophilia melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Jun;71(2):255–286. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryant P. J. Determination and pattern formation in the imaginal discs of Drosophila. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1974;8:41–80. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60605-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carpenter A. T. A meiotic mutant defective in distributive disjunction in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1973 Mar;73(3):393–428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.3.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carpenter A. T., Sandler L. On recombination-defective meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Mar;76(3):453–475. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.3.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clayberg C D. Cytogenetic Studies of Precocious Meiotic Centromere Division in Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill. Genetics. 1959 Nov;44(6):1335–1346. doi: 10.1093/genetics/44.6.1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis B. K. Genetic analysis of a meiotic mutant resulting in precocious sister-centromere separation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;113(3):251–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00339546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis D. G. Chromosome Behavior under the Influence of Claret-Nondisjunctional in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1969 Mar;61(3):577–594. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.3.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garcia-Bellido A., Merriam J. R. Cell lineage of the imaginal discs in Drosophila gynandromorphs. J Exp Zool. 1969 Jan;170(1):61–75. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401700106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Garcia-Bellido A., Ripoll P., Morata G. Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nat New Biol. 1973 Oct 24;245(147):251–253. doi: 10.1038/newbio245251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gelbart W. M. A new mutant controlling mitotic chromosome disjunction in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Jan;76(1):51–63. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grell E. H. Distributive pairing: mechanism for segregation of compound autosomal chromosomes in oocytes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1970 May;65(1):65–74. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall J. C. Chromosome segregation influenced by two alleles of the meiotic mutant c(3)G in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Jul;71(3):367–400. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.3.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heddle J. A., Wolff S., Whissell D., Cleaver J. E. Distribution of chromatids at mitosis. Science. 1967 Nov 17;158(3803):929–931. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3803.929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hinton C W. The Behavior of an Unstable Ring Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1955 Nov;40(6):951–961. doi: 10.1093/genetics/40.6.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hotta Y., Benzer S. Mapping of behaviour in Drosophila mosaics. Nature. 1972 Dec 29;240(5383):527–535. doi: 10.1038/240527a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacob F., Ryter A., Cuzin F. On the association between DNA and membrane in bacteria. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Mar 22;164(995):267–278. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lark K. G., Consigli R. A., Minocha H. C. Segregation of sister chromatids in mammalian cells. Science. 1966 Dec 2;154(3753):1202–1205. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3753.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lark K. G. Sister Chromatid Segregation during Mitosis in Polyploid Wheat. Genetics. 1969 Jun;62(2):289–305. doi: 10.1093/genetics/62.2.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee W. R., Kirby C. J., Debney C. W. The relation of germ line mosaicism to somatic mosaicism in Drosophila. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):619–634. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lindsley D L, Novitski E. Localization of the Genetic Factors Responsible for the Kinetic Activity of X Chromosomes of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1958 Sep;43(5):790–798. doi: 10.1093/genetics/43.5.790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindsley D. L., Sandler L., Baker B. S., Carpenter A. T., Denell R. E., Hall J. C., Jacobs P. A., Miklos G. L., Davis B. K., Gethmann R. C. Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome. Genetics. 1972 May;71(1):157–184. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES