Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2025 Apr 16;15(6):jkaf085. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaf085

An RNAi screen of Rab GTPase genes in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that morphogenesis has a higher demand than stem cell niche maintenance for rab-1 in the somatic cells of the reproductive system

Noor Singh 1,#, Kayt Scott 2,#, Jayce Proctor 3, Kacy Lynn Gordon 4,5,✉,c
Editor: J Ward
PMCID: PMC12135009  PMID: 40239019

Abstract

Membrane trafficking is a crucial function of all cells and is regulated at multiple levels from vesicle formation, packaging, and localization to fusion, exocytosis, and endocytosis. Rab GTPase proteins are core regulators of eukaryotic membrane trafficking, but developmental roles of specific Rab GTPases are less well characterized, potentially because of their essentiality for basic cellular function. Caenorhabditis elegans gonad development entails the coordination of cell growth, proliferation, and migration—processes in which membrane trafficking is known to be required. Here, we take an organ-focused approach to Rab GTPase function in vivo to assess the roles of Rab genes in reproductive system development. We performed a whole-body RNAi screen of the entire Rab family in C. elegans to uncover Rabs essential for gonad development. Notable gonad defects resulted from RNAi knockdown of rab-1, the key regulator of ER–Golgi trafficking. We then examined the effects of tissue-specific RNAi knockdown of rab-1 in somatic reproductive system and germline cells. We interrogated the dual functions of the distal tip cell as both a leader cell of gonad organogenesis and the germline stem cell niche. We find that rab-1 functions cell-autonomously and non-cell-autonomously to regulate both somatic gonad and germline development. Gonad migration, elongation, and gamete differentiation—but surprisingly not germline stem niche function—are highly sensitive to rab-1 RNAi.

Keywords: Rab GTPase, RNAi, C. elegans, gonad, germline, stem cell, gamete differentiation, Animalia

Introduction

Members of the Rab family of GTPases—within the Ras superfamily—broadly regulate vesicular traffic within eukaryotic cells, including in specialized cell functions such as cell division (Gibieža and Prekeris 2018), cell polarity (Parker et al. 2018), and the release of neuropeptides into the synapse (Sasidharan et al. 2012). When systematically knocked out in a cell culture system with a method that is sensitive to potential redundancy among paralogs, specific functions for Rab family members have been revealed (Homma et al. 2019). While Rab GTPase-dependent membrane trafficking has been studied in Caenorhabditis elegans (Sato et al. 2014), only a handful of the 31 members of the Rab family have been investigated at a developmental genetic level (Lundquist 2006; Ghosh and Sternberg 2014). We hypothesize that the absence of literature exploring the roles of many Rab genes in C. elegans development is due to both redundancy among members of this family and essentiality of many Rab family members; nearly half of the Rab genes have been shown to cause lethality with strong loss of function in C. elegans (Table 1).

Table 1.

RNAi screen of all identified C. elegans rab GTPase genes in a strain with markers for the germline and somatic gonad.

C. elegans gene Clone number Human ortholog (Gallegos et al. 2012) RNAi exposure timing Most severe known C. elegans LOF phenotype Reference Gonad defect observed Severity (mild, moderate, severe)
rab-1 C39F7.4 RAB1A Maternal, L1 Embryonic lethal Couillault et al. (2004) Yes Severe
unc-108/rab-2 F53F10.4 RAB2B Maternal Embryonic lethal Li et al. (2009) No
rab-3 C18A3.6 RAB3 L1 Behavioral defect Gracheva et al. (2008); Nonet et al. (1997) No
rab-5 F26H9.6 RAB5C Maternal L1 lethal Huang et al. (2022) Yes Moderate
rab-6.1 F59B2.7 RAB6A L1 Embryonic lethal (when codepleted with rab-6.2) Audhya et al. (2007); Zhang et al. (2008) No
rab-6.2 T25G12.4 RAB6A L1 DTC migration defect (see rab-6.1) Shafaq-Zadah et al. (2015) Yes Severe
rab-7 W03C9.3 RAB7A Maternal Embryonic lethal Nieto et al. (2010) Yes moderate
rab-8 D1037.4 RAB8A L1 DTC migration defect Cram et al. (2006) No
rab-10 T23H2.5 RAB10 Maternal Sterile, sick Ceron et al. (2007) Yes Moderate
rab-11.1 F53G12.1 RAB11 Maternal Zygotic lethal Sato et al. (2008) Yes Mild
rab-11.2 W04G5.2 RAB11 Maternal Slow growth Simmer et al. (2003) Yes Moderate to severe
rab-14a,b K09A9.2 RAB14 Maternal Accumulated cell corpses Guo et al. (2010) No
rab-18 Y92C3B.3 RAB18 L1 Lethal tm2052 2024 (variation)—WormBase No
rab-19 Y62E10A.9 RAB19 L1 Axonal and dendritic protein sorting Li et al. (2016) Yes Severe
rab-21 T01B7.3 RAB21 L1 Embryonic lethal Fernandez et al. (2005) No
rab-27/aex-6 Y87G2A.4 RAB27A L1 Larval arrest Mukhopadhyay et al. (2007) No
rab-28 Y11D7A.4 RAB28 Maternal None No
rab-30 Y45F3A.2 RAB30 L1 None No
rab-33 F43D9.2 RAB33A L1 None No
rab-35 Y47D3A.25 RAB35 L1 Embryonic lethal Haley and Zhou (2021) No
rab-37 W01H2.3 RAB37 Maternal None No
rab-39 D2013.1 RAB39 L1 Oxidative stress phenotype Takenaka et al. (2013) No
- C56E6.2 No direct ortholog L1 None Yes Severe
glo-1b R07B1.12 RAB32 L1 Embryonic lethal Hermann et al. (2005) Yes Severe
rabr-2 4R79.2 RAB44 related L1 Synthetic growth and intestinal defects Sakaki et al. (2012) Yes Severe
rabr-4 and rabr-3c F11A5.3 RAB2 related L1 Reduced lipid contentd Ashrafi et al. (2003) No
rabr-1 K02E10.1 No direct ortholog L1 Dendrite branching defect Salazar et al. (2024) No
tag-312/rsef-1 C33D12.6 RAB45/RASEF related L1 utse defect Ghosh and Sternberg (2014) No
- Y71H2AM.12b RAB6 related L1 None No
- ZK669.5 RAB23 related L1 None No

aThe sequenced Ahringer Library clone K09A9.2 (rab-14) does not map to the rab-14 sequence, but instead largely maps only to the empty RNAi vector (L4440).

bRNAi clone designed for this study.

cclone F11A5.3 mapped to both rabr-4 and rabr-3 exons.

d rabr-4 defect; no documented rabr-3 defects.

We probed the roles of Rab family genes in hermaphrodite gonad development (Fig. 1a), as the gonad is rapidly growing and contains proliferative germ cells (Roy et al. 2016) and large somatic cells (Byrd et al. 2014; Gordon 2020; Li et al. 2022), suggesting a significant dependence on intracellular trafficking. The gonad is also signal-active, with crucial regulatory interactions occurring between the soma and germline throughout life (Killian and Hubbard 2005; Kimble and Crittenden 2005; Gopal et al. 2021) and between the migrating somatic cells and the surrounding extracellular milieu during gonadogenesis (Meighan and Schwarzbauer 2007; Agarwal et al. 2022; Singh et al. 2024). We designed a conservative RNAi screening approach that circumvents early lethality to reveal postembryonic developmental requirements for a third of Rab genes—rab5, rab-7, rab-10, rab-11.1, rab-11.2, glo-1, rab-6.2, rab-1, rab-19, rabr-2, and C56E6.2during gonad development in C. elegans hermaphrodites. Secondary screening of rab-1 in tissue-specific RNAi strains reveals that rab-1 is required cell-autonomously for proper gonad and vulval morphogenesis and noncell-autonomously for gamete formation. Surprisingly, the stem cell niche function of the distal tip cell (DTC) is not sensitive to the cell-autonomous rab-1 knockdown that is sufficient to completely block gonad morphogenesis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Whole-body rab-1 knockdown leads to large-scale defects in the gonad. a) Cartoon showing position of 2 gonad arms inside of worm body (above) and representative gonad shapes of control (lower left) and rab-1 RNAi gonads (center and right). Vulva shown with V, and location where proximal gonad fails to form in RNAi samples shown with asterisks. b)–d) Representative images of germ cells (yellow; mex-5p::H2B::mCherry::nos-2 3′UTR) (b′–d′) and somatic gonad DTC and sheath cells (magenta; GFP::INX-9) (b″–d″). Adults that escaped severe embryonic and larval defects after hatching on whole-body rab-1 RNAi (imaged 4 days post-maternal exposure) (c–c″, d–d″) have fewer germ cells and smaller gonads in n = 4/16 worms compared with adults hatched on L4440 empty RNAi vector (b-b″) and display turning and gonad growth defects (c-c″) as well as catastrophic gonad defects (d–d″). e)–g) Representative images of strain expressing markers for the DTC (cyan; lag-2p::mNeonGreen::PLCδPH) (e′–g′) and gonadal sheath cells (magenta; mKate::INX-8) (e″–g″). Adults that escaped severe embryonic and larval defects after hatching on rab-1 RNAi (f–f″, g–g″) have DTC and sheath cells in the correct relative positions, but with aberrant morphology in n = 6/12 worms compared to L4440 treated controls (e-e″). Phenotypes range from growth defects (f–f″) to catastrophic gonad defects (g–g″). Gonads outlined in white dashed lines. h) Representative image of gonad morphology in unmarked N2 animals hatched on rab-1 RNAi (imaged 4 days post-maternal exposure) showing growth arrest and gonad morphology defects. Visible portion of the affected gonad in DIC is outlined in white dashed line. All scale bars = 20 μm. i) Graph showing percentage lethality and percentage body growth defects in larvae exposed to rab-1 RNAi from the L1 stage for 72 h in both the marked strain shown in b)–d) (GFP::1NX-9; mex-5p::H2B::mCherry::nos-2 3′UTR) and the unmarked N2 strain. Error bars represent SE of the sample proportion (see Methods).

Materials and methods

Sections of this text are adapted from prior Gordon lab publications (Li et al. 2022; Singh et al. 2024), as they describe our standard laboratory practices and equipment.

RNAi

A single colony of E. coli  HT115(DE3) containing the L4440 plasmid with or without (L4440 RNAi control) a dsRNA trigger insert from the Ahringer (Kamath and Ahringer 2003) or Vidal (Rual et al. 2004) RNAi libraries, or our own clone in the case of rab-14, glo-1 and Y71H2AM.12, was grown as an overnight culture containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml, VWR [Avantor], Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) no. 69-52-3) at 37°C. Expression was induced with 1 mM IPTG (Apex BioResearch Products, CAS no. 367-93-1) for 1 h at 37°C, and 150–300 µl of induced RNAi culture was plated on NGM plates and allowed to grow on the benchtop at least overnight. Glycerol stocks were prepared from the preinduction overnight culture for storage at −80°C for future use, and a subsample was miniprepped and sent for sequencing to verify sequence of insert.

Worm populations were synchronized by bleaching according to a standard egg prep protocol (Stiernagle 2006), plated on NGM plates seeded with RNAi-expressing bacteria as arrested L1 larvae or in the maternal generation (as described below), and kept on RNAi until the time of imaging. See Supplementary Table 1 for full details about developmental staging and RNAi exposure time for all experiments.

Initial Rab whole-body RNAi screening

Worms were maintained at 20°C. In the case of maternal RNAi exposure, 2–3 L4 hermaphrodites with somatic gonad membrane protein and germline nuclear markers (see Supplementary Table 3) were added to RNAi plates and allowed to feed on RNAi-expressing bacteria prior to egg laying. In the case of L1 RNAi exposure, synced L1s were plated on RNAi plates. Offspring were assessed for adult phenotypes 4 days later for maternal exposure and 72 h (3 days) later for L1 exposure, both at 20°C. rab-1 maternal RNAi treatment resulted in high levels of embryonic lethality or larval arrest. In this case, RNAi was repeated by dropping egg-prepped L1 larvae directly onto rab-1 RNAi plates and assessing adult phenotypes 72 h later. Each RNAi treatment was paired with an L4440 empty vector control treatment, none of which ever showed gonad growth defects. Therefore, an RNAi treatment that caused even a single incidence of gonad growth defect was counted as a “hit.”

Tissue-specific and temporal RNAi of rab-1

The same rab-1 RNAi clone used in the initial screen was rescreened in animals with tissue-specific RNAi activity. Germline-specific RNAi used a strain MAH23 carrying a mutation in rrf-1(pk1417); it has some residual RNAi function in somatic cells (Kumsta and Hansen 2012). We validated germline sensitivity to RNAi in this strain with glp-1 RNAi, which caused the expected high-penetrance defect of gonad growth (n = 36/44 gonads, see Supplementary Fig. 2).

A second tissue-specific strain has RNAi activity only in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells, namely the DTC, anchor cell (AC), and primary vulval precursors (see Supplementary Fig. 4). This strain, NK2115, carries an rde-1(ne219) loss of function that prevents RNAi activity globally, with RNAi function restored in the DTC and other cells (in an operon along with a coding sequence for membrane-tethered mNeonGreen) by a transgene lag-2p::mNG::PLCδPH::F2A::rde-1 and a rrf-3(pk1426) mutation that enhances RNAi. RNAi treatment in this strain was conducted at 16°C due to the temperature-sensitive rrf-3(pk1426) mutation (Linden et al. 2017). A third tissue-specific strain, NK1316, has uterine-specific RNAi activity with fos-1ap::rde-1 (Hagedorn et al. 2009; Matus et al. 2010) and functions by restoring RDE-1 protein activity in rde-1(ne219) mutant animals only to those cells of the somatic gonad that are under the control of the fos-1a promoter, expressed in uterine cells in the mid to late L2 stage. NK1316 also carries the rrf-3(pk1426) mutation that enhances RNAi, and fluorescent markers (see Supplementary Table 3).

Scoring rab-1 RNAi defects

In histograms in Figs. 2 and 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2, RNAi-treated gonads that either failed to produce embryos or had severely deformed embryos were scored as having a severe embryo defect (see panel in Fig. 2c) and gonads that formed embryos that were clumped, disorganized, or misshapen were scored as having a mild embryo defect (see representative panel in Fig. 2b). Gamete phenotypes were scored as “severe gamete defect” (see representative panel in Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 2b and d) if they either failed to produce gametes, produced severely deformed gametes, or had a severely reduced number of gametes. Gonads scored as having a “gonad defect” included samples that had severe gonad/germline growth defects (representative panel in Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 2b and d) or those that have an overall gonad migration defect, or gonads that had both classes of defects (representative panel in Fig. 3e). Uterine defects were scored as absence of or deformed utse (uterine-seam) cell.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

C. elegans with germline-specific rab-1 RNAi knockdown develop gonads with embryo defects. Representative DIC images of MAH23 (rrf-1(pk1417)) worms treated with L4440 control (a) or rab-1 RNAi (b and c) for 72 h starting at the L1 stage. b) A portion of germline-specific rab-1 RNAi-treated gonads have largely normal gonad morphology and gametes, but have disorganized, clumped, or misshapen embryos (classified as mild embryo defect, n = 12/38 gonads). c) Another portion of germline-specific rab-1 RNAi-treated gonads have more severe gamete and embryo defects (severe embryo defect, n = 16/38 gonads). c′ shows the inset indicated by yellow box with abnormal gametes and no embryos. d) Quantification of gonad and vulva defects in germline-specific rab-1 RNAi- and L4440 control-treated animals for 72 h from the L1 stage. n = 3/20 worms had a mild vulval defect (delay and pvl); n = 11/38 gonads had gonad defects (see Methods for scoring criteria). Error bars represent SE of the sample proportion. e). Quantification of embryo and gamete defects in germline-specific rab-1 RNAi- and L4440 control-treated animals for 72 h from the L1 stage. n = 16/38 gonads had severe embryo defects, n = 12/38 had mild embryo defects, and n = 10/38 had normal/fertilized embryos. n = 9/38 gonads had severe gamete defects (see Methods for scoring criteria). Error bars represent SE of the sample proportion. Representative DIC images of MAH23 (rrf-1(pk1417)) worms treated with L4440 control (f) or rab-1 RNAi (g) imaged 4 days post-maternal exposure. g′) shows the inset indicated by yellow box with the absence of gametes and embryos. h) 100% of maternal rab-1 germline-specific RNAi-treated gonads (n = 12/12 gonads) had severe gonad, gamete, and embryo defects. Yellow arrows mark the vulva, yellow arrowheads mark embryos, blue arrowheads mark sperm (spermatheca), and pink arrowheads mark oocytes. All scale bars = 20 μm. All gonads outlined in black dashed lines.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Somatic gonad-specific RNAi knockdown of rab-1 causes numerous gonad defects. Representative images of rde-1(ne219) mutants rescued with a lag2p::mNG::PLCδPH::F2A::rde-1 transgene restoring RNAi function and driving membrane-localized fluorescence protein mNeonGreen in cells that express the lag-2 promoter on empty L4440 vector control (a) and rab-1 RNAi (b) for 48 h after L1 arrest. Fluorescence merged with a single DIC z-slice (left), fluorescence alone (right, 8 μm maximum intensity projection displayed on a log scale to show DTC and dimmer VPCs, yellow arrows). Scale bars = 20 μm. Gonads outlined in dashed lines; control uterine lumen outlined in solid black line. Unbroken basement membrane in rab-1 RNAi-treated (b) animal bracketed in yellow. c) Quantification of vulval (left) and DTC migration (right) defects in L4440 control and rab-1 RNAi-treated animals following lag-2p+-specific RNAi for 48 h post-L1 exposure. (Left) Tissue-specific rab-1 RNAi-treated worms (n = 17) have delayed vulva formation compared with controls (n = 16). For controls, n = 1/16 had not yet completed vulva formation, but n = 17/17 rab-1 RNAi-treated worms had such a delay. (Right) Tissue-specific rab-1 RNAi-treated worms (n = 50) have defective DTC migration compared with controls (n = 31). One gonad arm scored per worm. Growth of both gonad arms was typically affected, but the deeper DTC under the gut was difficult to score for orientation of turning. All control DTCs completed migration. For rab-1 RNAi, n = 17/50 had no turn, n = 7/50 had just a first turn, n = 9/50 had a misdirected second turn, n = 4/50 had no extension after the second turn, and n = 13/50 completed migration. Error bars show SE of the sample proportion in c). Representative DIC images of uterine-specific (fos-1ap::rde-1) gonads treated with L4440 control (d) and rab-1 RNAi (e) for 72 h post-L1 exposure. Yellow arrows mark vulva, yellow arrowheads mark embryos, blue arrowheads mark sperm (spermatheca), and pink arrowheads mark oocytes. Scale bars = 20 μm. Gonads outlined in black dashed lines. f) Quantification of gonad, vulval, gamete, and embryo defects in L4440 control and rab-1 RNAi-treated animals represented in d) and e). In L4440 controls, n = 1/10 gonads had both severe embryo and gamete defect, n = 3/12 gonads had gonad defects, and n = 1/10 worms had a vulval defect. The variation in the total gonads scored is due to some gonads not having one of the scored features in frame. For rab-1 RNAi-treated animals, n = 17/17 gonads had both severe gamete and embryo defects, n = 18/21 gonads had gonad defects, and n = 4/11 worms had vulval defects. Not every phenotype could be scored in every sample, causing variations in sample size within a treatment group. Error bars show SE of the sample proportion in f).

Scoring DTC (gonad) migration and vulval defects

To characterize the effects of rab-1 RNAi knockdown in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells on gonad (DTC) migration and vulval development in Figs. 3 and 4, DTC migration was scored by the following categories: CT: complete migration; NT: no turn; FT: first turn only; ST: second turn complete, but no extension; MD: misdirected second turn (Figs. 3 and 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Reproductive system defects persist after prolonged rab-1 RNAi knockdown in lag-2 promoter-expressing somatic gonad cells. Representative images of reproductive age (72 h post-L1) animals with tissue-specific RNAi in cells expressing a lag2p::mNG::PLCδPH::F2A::rde-1 transgene restoring RNAi function and driving membrane-localized fluorescence protein mNeonGreen on empty L4440 vector control (a) and rab-1 RNAi (b, c) for 72 h after L1 exposure. Fluorescence merged with a single DIC z-slice (left), fluorescence alone (middle, maximum intensity projection through slices with mNeonGreen signal). a′) and b′) show insets indicated by yellow boxes. Scale bars = 20 μm. Gonads outlined in black or white dashed lines. Dashed yellow lines in a′) and b′) indicate length of DTC as measured for d). Yellow arrows (a–c) indicate vulva or site of expected vulval formation, showing normal vulva (a), protruding vulva (b), and vulvaless (c) phenotypes. Yellow arrowhead in a) indicates embryonic mNG expression. Quantification of rab-1 tissue-specific RNAi-treated worm defects in DTC growth (d), vulva formation (e), and DTC migration (f) compared with L4440 control-treated animals following 72 h of RNAi exposure (from the L1 stage). Both gonad arms in the same worm were scored if both were visible. d) rab-1 RNAi-treated worms (n = 21) have significantly shorter DTCs than controls (n = 18). Welch's t-test t(36.11) = 5.368, P < 0.0001, error bars show SEM. e) While n = 6/6 control samples had normal vulvas, only n = 1/17 rab-1 RNAi samples had normal vulva, n = 5/17 had a missing vulva, n = 10/17 had a protruding vulva, and n = 1/17 ruptured through its protruding vulva on the slide. Error bars show SE of the sample proportion. f) While n = 18/18 control samples had complete DTC migration, only n = 5/25 rab-1 RNAi samples completed migration, n = 10/25 failed to make any turns or elongate, n = 4/25 made the second turn in the wrong direction, and n = 6/25 made both turns and then failed to extend. Error bars show SE of the sample proportion.

Vulva formation was scored as wild type or delayed (large, round, lag-2p::mNG+VPCs still visible) at 48 h (Fig. 3) or wild type, protruding vulva (pvl), and vulvaless (vul) at 72 h (Fig. 4). DTC length was measured from tip to end of the longest process (Linden et al. 2017).

Scoring DAPI-stained specimen

DAPI-stained adult worms (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 2g and h) were scored for presence of oocytes (large cells with chromosomes in diakinesis), spermatids (small pinpoints of DAPI), and embryos (multicellular structures in the proximal gonad). Progenitor zone was scored from the tip to the first row of germ cells with 2 crescent-shaped nuclei (Hubbard 2007). Some rab-1 RNAi samples lacked an identifiable transition zone and were not scored for this measure. Mitotic figures were scored as a single bright metaphase plate or a pair of anaphase DAPI bodies; these were scored in the distal gonad and found to be absent in the proximal gonad.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

RNAi knockdown of rab-1 in lag-2 promoter-expressing somatic gonad cells causes germline proliferation and differentiation defects. Representative images of DAPI-stained reproductive age adult rde-1(ne219) mutants rescued with a lag2p::mNG::PLCδPH::F2A::rde-1 transgene restoring RNAi function in cells that express the lag-2 promoter on empty L4440 control (a) and the range of defects observed after tissue-specific rab-1 RNAi for 72 h after L1 arrest (b, d, e). b′) shows inset indicated by yellow box (b). Dividing/mitotic germ cells are marked by yellow circle. Gametes, when present, are circled in pink (oocytes) and blue (spermatids). Embryos circled in orange. Dashed green line shows length of progenitor zone as measured for c). c) lag-2p+ rab-1 RNAi-treated worms after 72 h following L1 RNAi exposure (n = 14) have shorter progenitor zones than control (n = 12), Welch's t-test, t(23.52) = 4.106, P = 0.0004; error bars show median with interquartile range. d) Pachytene arrest after 72 h on rab-1 RNAi. d′) Same specimen in d) acquired with 1.6× optical zoom on region boxed in d). Yellow arrowheads indicate exemplar pachytene germ cells. Yellow arrow indicates site of expected vulva formation. e) Spermatogenesis after 72 h on rab-1 RNAi. e′) Same specimen in e) acquired with 1.6× optical zoom of region boxed in e). Arrowheads indicate exemplar pachytene germ cells; spermatids circled in blue. Gonads outlined in dashed white lines. Yellow arrows indicate vulva or position of expected position of vulva formation, whenever in frame. Scale bars = 20 μm. f) Quantification of gametogenesis and embryo formation phenotypes in 72-h L4440 control- and rab-1 RNAi-treated lag-2p+ cell-specific RNAi animals represented in d) and e). f) Gamete (left) and embryo (right) defects observed for tissue-specific rab-1 RNAi (n = 52 gonads) and L4440 control (n = 20 gonads). Error bars show SE of the sample proportion. 100% of L4440 control-treated gonads formed both gametes and embryos. For rab-1 tissue-specific RNAi-treated animals, n = 28/52 gonads lacked gametes (germ cells in pachytene arrest), n = 12/52 gonads had both spermatids and oocytes, and n = 12/52 gonads had produced either spermatids or spermatocytes (developing sperm). n = 0/52 had formed embryos. g), h) Representative images of DAPI-stained lag-2p+ cell-specific rab-1 RNAi-treated worms after 96 h following L1 RNAi exposure. g) Pachytene arrest after 96 h on rab-1 RNAi. g′) shows inset indicated by yellow box in g). Yellow arrowheads indicate exemplar pachytene germ cells. Yellow arrow indicates site of expected vulva formation. h) Spermatogenesis after 96 h on rab-1 RNAi. h′) shows inset indicated by yellow box in h). Yellow arrow indicates site of expected vulva formation. Spermatids circled in blue. Gonads outlined in white dashed lines. i) Quantification of gametogenesis and embryo formation phenotypes in 96-h L4440 control- and rab-1 RNAi-treated lag-2p+ cell-specific RNAi animals represented in g) and h). Gamete (left) and embryo (right) defects observed for tissue-specific rab-1 RNAi (n = 28 gonads) and L4440 control (n = 9 gonads). 100% of L4440 control-treated gonads had formed both gametes and embryos. For rab-1 tissue-specific RNAi-treated animals, n = 15/28 gonads lacked gametes (germ cells in pachytene arrest), n = 4/28 gonads had both spermatids and oocytes, and another n = 9/28 gonads had produced either spermatids or spermatocytes (developing sperm). n = 0/28 had formed embryos. Error bars show SE of the sample proportion.

Confocal imaging

All images were acquired at room temperature on a Leica DMI8 with an xLIGHT V3 confocal spinning disk head (89 North) with a 63× Plan-Apochromat (1.4 NA) objective and an ORCAFusion GenIII sCMOS camera (Hamamatsu Photonics) controlled by microManager. RFPs were excited with a 555-nm laser; GFPs and mNGs were excited with a 488-nm laser; DAPI was excited with a 405 nm laser. Z-stacks through the gonad were acquired with a step-size of 1 µm unless otherwise noted. Worms were mounted on agar pads in M9 buffer with 0.01 M sodium azide (VWR [Avantor] CAS no. 26628-22-8l). Some samples were acquired with a 1.6× optical zoom, as indicated in the figure legends (Fig. 5d′ and e′).

Image analysis

Images were processed in FIJI89 (version: 2.14.1/1.54f). Larger images tile several acquisitions of the same sample (Preibisch et al. 2009).

Statistical analysis

Sample sizes vary slightly for measurements gathered from the same dataset if certain cell types were not clearly represented (for example, if the vulva is visible but the DTC is under the gut, or the image quality allows the DTC to be scored for position but not for length of processes). Sample sizes stated in figure legends or text reflect the number of samples analyzed for the specific feature being measured. Welch's 2-sample t-tests were used to compare rab-1 RNAi to controls. SE of the sample proportion for the histograms in Figs. 1–5 and Supplementary Fig. 2 (after Levy-Strumpf et al. 2015) was calculated using the following equation:

SEp^=p^(1p^)n

where p^ is the percentage of specimen of the total observed (n) with the phenotype and error bars reflecting this calculation were added to plots using GraphPad Prism (Prism 10 for Mac OS; version 10.1.0 (264), 2023 October 18).

Results and discussion

Several Rab genes are required for the development of normal gonad morphology

We took an unbiased approach to characterizing roles for Rab GTPases in C. elegans gonad development (Fig. 1a) with a whole-body postembryonic RNAi screen in strains coexpressing a marker of germline nuclei and GFP::INX-9, a marker of the DTC and somatic gonadal sheath (see Supplementary Table 3) (Gordon et al. 2020; Li et al. 2022). This strain allows us not only to see overall gonad size and shape, but to resolve somatic cell structure and germ cell nuclear morphology after RNAi treatment (compare Fig. 1b–h). Because gonad development is a postembryonic process that culminates in reproductive adulthood, and there is documented lethality caused by loss of function for nearly half of C. elegans Rab genes (Table 1), we opted not to use a strain that is sensitized for whole-body RNAi. This makes our screen conservative and hopefully enriches for phenotypes caused by the loss of later-acting phases of Rab gene activity. We tested all 31 genes in the Rab family reported in a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis (Gallegos et al. 2012). We validated clones from the Ahringer RNAi library (Kamath and Ahringer 2003) for 25 Rab-encoding genes, the Vidal Unique library (Rual et al. 2004) for 3 genes (rab-35, rab-19, and C56E6.2), and generated our own clones for 3 genes (glo-1, rab-14, and Y71H2AM.12, Supplementary Table 2). The results from the screen are given in Table 1, along with a summary of the most severe loss-of-function phenotype for each gene reported on WormBase (Sternberg et al. 2024).

By analyzing knockdown phenotypes, we confirmed that loss of function of rab-5 (Pushpa et al. 2021), rab-7 (Guo et al. 2010), and rab-10 (Shi et al. 2010) causes gonad defects. We identified gonad defect phenotypes following knockdown of rab-11.1, rab-11.2, glo-1, rab-6.2, and rab-1, as well as 3 genes for which little functional data are currently available: rab-19, rabr-2,  C56E6.2 (Supplementary Fig. 1).

The Rab family genes that we found to cause gonad growth defects act in a range of processes. Only two, rab-5 and rab-7, are previously known to act in the cells of the gonad. RAB-5 interacts with the PAR and exocyst complexes in the germline to control levels of GLP-1/Notch at the membrane that acts as the receptor of the DTC-expressed stemness cue LAG-2 (Pushpa et al. 2021). Evidence from Drosophila and mammalian cells indicates that RAB7 and RAB8 are required for proper localization of NOTCH1-GFP (Court et al. 2017). In C. elegans,  RAB-5 also acts with other Rab family members during engulfment of apoptotic cells; RAB-14, UNC-108/RAB-2, and RAB-7 follow RAB-5 recruitment and act sequentially in the formation of phagolysosomes in engulfing cells, including the gonadal sheath cells that engulf apoptotic germ cells (Guo et al. 2010). Knockdown of a RAB-7 guanine nucleotide exchange factor, vps-45, also causes defects in apoptotic germ cell engulfment (Kinchen et al. 2008).

Several of the Rab genes that cause gonad defects after RNAi have known roles in the C. elegans intestine: rab-10, rab-11.1, rab-11.2, and glo-1. The exocyst complex interacts with RAB-11 and RAB-10 in basolateral recycling and endosomal trafficking in the intestine (Shi et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2014; Li et al. 2024). The gene glo-1 is required for the formation of lysosome-related organelles called gut granules (Hermann et al. 2005; Morris et al. 2018). Since the gonad is exquisitely sensitive to nutrient state (Templeman and Murphy 2018), noncell-autonomous gonad defects could be caused by breakdown in the gut-gonad trafficking and signaling axes. While some of these genes are also expressed in neurons (e.g. rab-10, Zou et al. 2015), RNAi is notoriously inefficient in neurons (Calixto et al. 2010), so we conclude that neuronal knockdown is unlikely to be the cause of the defects that we observe.

Previous studies report that rab-8 (Cram et al. 2006) and rab-6.2 (Shafaq-Zadah et al. 2015) RNAi cause defects in later phases of DTC migration. Our screen did not detect these migration phenotypes but did detect a gonad growth defect after rab-6.2 RNAi. RNAi is inherently variable in its efficiency, so we do not consider this negative result to be in conflict with previous findings that these genes are required for DTC migration. Indeed, they suggest that our screen is conservative, as designed.

We also observed gonad growth defects after knockdown of 3 genes about which little is known: rab-19, rabr-2, and C56E6.2. rab-19 is most closely related to human RAB19 and RAB43, and rabr-2/4R39.2 is homologous to human RAB44 (Gallegos et al. 2012). C56E6.2 does not have a clear human ortholog, but it has been reported to be transcribed in the somatic gonad precursors, Z1 and Z4 (Kroetz and Zarkower 2015). Finally, we found that normal gonad growth requires rab-1, the C. elegans paralog of human RAB1A and yeast YPT1, which is the founding member of the Rab family and key regulator of ER–Golgi transport.

rab-1 knockdown has profound effects on the germline that are cell autonomous and non-cell autonomous

The candidate we chose to pursue further is rab-1. We found that rab-1 is important for gonad development, with rab-1 RNAi causing severe defects in worms that survived to adulthood (Fig. 1a–i). Maternal rab-1 RNAi caused a ~97% embryonic lethality as compared to controls (control progeny n = 275, rab-1 RNAi progeny n = 8 larvae by day 3 after placing L4 mothers on plates and allowing them to lay). Most worms (marker strain shown in Fig. 1 b–d) and unmarked N2 animals (represented in Fig. 1h) treated from the L1 stage for 72 h with rab-1 RNAi exhibited larval growth arrest or lethality by the L3 stage (Fig. 1i), which is to be expected given the early homozygous lethality of the balanced rab-1(ok3750) deletion allele (C. elegans Deletion Mutant Consortium, 2012). When we consider only worms that progressed through larval development after whole-body maternal rab-1 RNAi, gonads were small, misshapen, had very few germ cells, and never laid embryos on the plate (Fig. 1c, d, and f–h). By screening in a genetic background expressing a marker of the somatic gonadal sheath and DTC (a tagged innexin protein, GFP::INX-9 (Gordon et al. 2020; Li et al. 2022), we can additionally observe that punctate membrane localization of INX-9 is impaired after rab-1 RNAi (Fig. 1c″ and d″). A similar disruption of membrane protein signal was observed after rab-1 RNAi in a genetic background expressing another tagged innexin, mKate::INX-8 (Gordon et al. 2020; Li et al. 2022) (Fig. 1f″ and g″). These tagged innexins and a DTC-expressed membrane-localized mNeonGreen::PLCδPH reveal abnormal localization in the DTC and sheath after rab-1 RNAi. While the DTC and somatic gonadal sheath are at a minimum present and in the correct relative positions—with the DTC at the tip and the gonadal sheath surrounding the germline—they have abnormal sizes, shapes, and membrane protein localization after rab-1 RNAi. Wild-type N2 animals treated with maternal rab-1 RNAi under the same conditions (Fig. 1h) also have major gonad morphology and growth defects (as well as body growth defects).

Rab1 regulates ER–Golgi trafficking generally (Plutner et al. 1991). However, in Drosophila clonal analysis (Charng et al. 2014) and S2 cells (Wang et al. 2010) Rab1 has been found to play more nuanced regulatory roles, including regulating Notch and integrin signaling. Such functions have been challenging to study in genetic loss-of-function mutants due to the critical role of Rab1 in basic cell function. Performing in vivo studies of this crucial gene in a developmental context can expand our understanding of how a highly conserved regulator of cellular processes can nonetheless play specific developmental roles.

To elucidate the tissue-specific functions of rab-1, we knocked down rab-1 predominantly in the germline in a strain bearing an rrf-1(pk1417) mutation for a somatic RNA-directed RNA polymerase; this strain has RNAi efficacy in the germline and some RNAi activity in the soma, notably the gut (Kumsta and Hansen 2012). When animals are exposed to rab-1 RNAi from the L1 stage, ∼29% had a gonad defect, primarily of gonad growth (Fig. 2a–d). Embryogenesis was notably impaired after germline-specific rab-1 RNAi; over 70% of gonads had embryo defects, and over 20% of gonads had severe gamete defects (Fig. 2b, c, and e). Worms were also smaller than age-matched controls (Supplementary Fig. 3), potentially due to rab-1 knockdown outside the germline. Germline defects may derive from aberrant trafficking of caveolin/CAV-1 after rab-1 knockdown, a known role of rab-1 in the germline (Sato et al. 2006). Caveolin trafficking requires both rab-1 and sar-1 (Sato et al. 2006), and we find that germline-specific sar-1 RNAi phenocopies defects caused by germline-specific rab-1 RNAi (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Maternal RNAi can sometimes be leveraged to get stronger knockdown of a gene of interest. Maternal germline-specific rab-1 RNAi resulted in adult animals that formed very short gonads with abnormal germ cells and abnormal embryos (Fig. 2f–h and Supplementary Fig. 2). Maternal sar-1 RNAi in this strain also caused fully penetrant gonad growth, gamete, and embryo defects in animals that reached adulthood (n = 10 gonads). These defects resemble maternal exposure to glp-1/Notch RNAi (Supplementary Fig. 2), in which the primordial germ cells Z2 and Z3 undergo a few divisions and then all germ cells exit the mitotic, stem-like state, as is known to happen after loss of function of Notch pathway genes in the germline (Fox and Schedl 2015).

Maternal exposure to RNAi in an RNAi strain with germline RNAi activity can lead to embryonic knockdown of targeted genes. Indeed, maternal rab-1 RNAi treatment caused considerable embryonic lethality: out of 2 hermaphrodite parents put on rab-1 RNAi, only 13 progeny escaped early larval arrest, of which 6 reached adulthood, while 2 parents on control RNAi produce hundreds of progeny. Maternal RNAi exposure in this strain therefore cannot distinguish between a specific requirement for rab-1 in Z2/Z3 primordial germ cells or the larval germline vs a general requirement for rab-1 in the developing embryo. We therefore focused on the most salient defects that manifest after L1 rab-1 RNAi exposure in this strain, after which rab-1 RNAi is more selective for the growing germline (Fig. 2a–e).

We determined that rab-1 is required in the germline for gonad growth and the production of normal gametes and viable embryos, but most importantly we can conclude that loss of germline-specific rab-1 function does not solely drive the dramatic gonad defects we see with whole-body rab-1 knockdown (compare Fig. 2b and c with Fig. 1). We hypothesized that somatic gonad cells require rab-1 function to properly regulate the germline, so we next investigated the role of rab-1 in somatic gonad cells.

rab-1 RNAi knockdown in lag-2p-expressing somatic cells of the developing reproductive system affects gonad migration and growth, as well as uterus and vulva development

Since germline knockdown of rab-1 does not recapitulate the gonad defects of whole-body rab-1 RNAi knockdown, we hypothesized that rab-1 may be required in the DTC for it to function as a germline stem cell niche and as the leader cell of gonad organogenesis. We performed rab-1 knockdown in a strain considered to have DTC-specific RNAi activity (Linden et al. 2017; Agarwal et al. 2022; Singh et al. 2024). The strain carries an rrf-3(pk1426) RNAi-sensitizing mutation and an rde-1(ne219) loss-of-function mutation rescued by a lag-2p::mNG::PLCδPH::F2A::rde-1 transgene restoring rde-1-dependent RNAi activity in sites of lag-2 promoter expression, most notably the DTC, along with membrane fluorescence (Linden et al. 2017). Forty-eight hours after L1 exposure at 20°C on rab-1 RNAi, DTC migration defects were seen in more than half of L4 larval animals (Fig. 3a, b, and c). These defects all involved the arrest of gonad elongation, often accompanied by failure to turn or misdirected turning, all defects that were absent in controls (Fig. 3a, b, and c). DTC migration requires signaling and adhesion, and proproliferative signaling from the DTC and gonadal sheath to the germ cells, proliferation of which provides the pushing force of migration (Agarwal et al. 2022). These DTC functions are mediated by cell membrane-bound receptors, and our results suggest they may be regulated by rab-1.

Surprisingly, these worms also lacked a well-differentiated uterine lumen or vulva (Fig. 3a–c). In wild-type worms, the vulva is patterned and connects to the uterus through a well-studied (Schindler and Sherwood 2013) series of inductive events and the invasion of the AC through the uterine and vulval basement membranes during the L3 larval stage (Katz et al. 1995; Sherwood and Sternberg 2003; Matus et al. 2010; Ihara et al. 2011; Morrissey et al. 2014). In L4 worms after 48 h on rab-1 RNAi, we observe failure of AC invasion, with an intact basement membrane visible with DIC microscopy separating the gonad from the cells that should have formed the vulva (n = 15/17) and comparatively weak mNeonGreen expression in these vulval precursor cells (VPCs, Fig. 3b). VPCs are known to express lag-2 (Zhang and Greenwald 2011); expression of the lag-2p::mNG::PLCδPH::F2A::rde-1 transgene that restores RNAi function is an average of ∼50 × weaker in these VPCs than in the DTC at this stage, based on quantification of mNeonGreen expression (n = 16 L4 worms on rab-1 RNAi with both vulval region and DTC captured). We see a delay in vulva formation in 17/17 of the rab-1 RNAi-treated worms at this stage. We hypothesize that loss of rab-1 function in the 1° VPCs prevents the completion of vulval development either through cell-autonomous defects in the 1° VPCs or the failure of these cells to signal to other cells, since VPCs engage in proinvasive signaling to the AC (Sherwood and Sternberg 2003) and production of Delta/Serrate/LAG-2 (DSL) signaling ligands to properly induce 2° VPC fate (Chen and Greenwald 2004).

There is no prior report of the effects of loss of rab-1 on vulva development, but rab-1 is required for proper development of the uterus, though its site of action in uterine development is not precisely known (Ghosh and Sternberg 2014). Uterine-specific rab-1 RNAi, in strain NK1316 with fos-1ap::rde-1 rescuing an rde-1 loss of function and an rrf-3(pk1426) RNAi-sensitizing mutation (Hagedorn et al. 2009; Matus et al. 2010), causes profound defects of both uterus development and gonad growth and morphogenesis (Fig. 3d–f). The induction of both the 1° VPC fate and the uterine pi cell fate is regulated by signaling from the AC (Newman et al. 1996). The AC itself arises from 1 of 2 equipotent cells (Z1.ppp and Z4.aaa) that initially express lag-2/DSL ligand and lin-12/Notch. Via lateral inhibition between the 2, lag-2 expression increases in 1 cell, which becomes the AC; the lin-12-expressing cell becomes the ventral uterine cell (Seydoux and Greenwald 1989). We confirmed that our lag-2p::mNG::PLCδPH::F2A::rde-1 rescue transgene is transiently expressed in the AC, but not in the other uterine cells (Supplementary Fig. 4), meaning that in addition to early, continuous, and strong expression rescuing RNAi activity in the DTCs and weak expression in the VPCs, this strain also likely has transient RNAi activity in the AC. Later in wild-type development, the AC fuses with a subset of descendent cells of the uterine pi lineage to become the uterine-seam cell (utse) (Newman et al. 1996), so it is possible that the AC could carry RNAi activity via RDE-1 protein into the utse upon fusion. Alternatively, by disrupting induction of the uterine pi cell fate by the AC, RNAi activity in the AC could prevent proper differentiation of uterine cell types.

Just as rab-1 RNAi in the vulva could affect proinvasive signaling to the AC, knockdown of rab-1 in the AC could also cause defects in vulval development. For example, vulval defects are observed if the AC fails to induce the primary vulval fate, fails to pattern the descendants of the 1° VPCs (Wang and Sternberg 2000), or otherwise fails to invade and connect the uterus and vulva (Sherwood and Sternberg 2003). In a prior RNAi screen for genes acting in the AC to regulate cell invasion that used a uterus-specific RNAi strain, rab-1 was not tested (Matus et al. 2010). When we expose the uterine-specific RNAi strain to rab-1 RNAi from the L1 stage, we find high penetrance of uterine defects (n = 9/10), no vulvaless worms, and few (n = 4/11) with more minor vulva defects (Fig. 3d–f). We conclude that severe defects in vulval morphogenesis are probably caused by rab-1 RNAi in the VPCs themselves, which express the lag-2p::mNG::PLCδPH::F2A::rde-1 RNAi rescue gene (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Prolonged tissue-specific rab-1 RNAi knockdown in somatic gonad cells impedes vulva formation, DTC niche maturation, and germ cell proliferation

Worms with RNAi activity in lag-2 promoter-expressing somatic cells treated with rab-1 RNAi were also smaller than those receiving control RNAi empty vector treatment (Supplementary Fig. 3). We next asked whether development was simply delayed, as whole-body rab-1 RNAi is documented to cause developmental delay (Ghosh and Sternberg 2014), or whether gonad defects would remain with prolonged rab-1 RNAi treatment. We allowed animals to continue to develop on rab-1 RNAi until the age-matched controls had reached reproductive adulthood (72 h after being released from L1 arrest at 20°C, Supplementary Table 1).

The penetrance of vulval morphology defects remained high after prolonged lag-2 promoter-expressing cell-specific rab-1 knockdown, though they progressed from the “delay” phenotypes in which VPCs expressing lag-2p::mNG could be easily identified in adults to phenotypes like protruding vulva (pvl) or missing vulva/vulvaless (vul) (Fig. 4a–c and e).

The penetrance of the DTC migration defects also remained high after 72 h (Fig. 4a–c and f), demonstrating that gonad migration and elongation do not recover over developmental time after knockdown of rab-1 in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells. These results are strong evidence that rab-1 knockdown in the DTC is interfering with gonad migration, not simply global progression of development. Proper migration requires germ cell proliferation-driven gonad growth (Agarwal et al. 2022) and turning, which is regulated by several signaling pathways (Levy-Strumpf et al. 2015; Singh et al. 2024) and interactions with the basement membrane (Agarwal et al. 2022).

Upon reaching reproductive age, animals with RNAi activity in lag-2-expressing somatic cells also developed germline defects. Worms had smaller DTCs (Fig. 4d) and smaller germline proliferative zones (Fig. 5a–c). We also observed fewer actively dividing cells after rab-1 RNAi, with an average of 1.67 divisions in rab-1-RNAi-treated worms and 3.58 dividing cells in the controls (Welch's 2-sample t-test, t = 2.6752, df = 23.992, P = 0.01324, 95% CI = 0.438–3.395). However, more than half of the RNAi-treated worms had mitotic figures (Fig. 5b–b′), and in no case did we observe evidence of germ cell differentiation at the distal end of the gonad, which is the expected phenotype if DTC-expressed LAG-2/DSL protein is not able to signal through GLP-1/Notch receptors on the distal germ cells (Cinquin et al. 2010; Fox and Schedl 2015). Continued maintenance of germ cells with the mitotic fate after prolonged rab-1 RNAi in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells suggests that localization of the stemness cue LAG-2 to the DTC membrane is not as sensitive to rab-1 knockdown as factors regulating DTC migration behavior.

A somatic signal that promotes pachytene exit and gamete differentiation depends on rab-1 activity in a lag-2 promoter-expressing cell

Scoring the length of the proliferative zone in DAPI-stained samples revealed 4/18 samples lacking a discernible transition zone, in which germ cells in early meiotic prophase have a distinctive crescent-shaped nuclear morphology (Hubbard 2007). The majority of animals also fail to make gametes—both sperm and eggs—normally (Fig. 5d, e, and f). When a germline is shorter than normal, meiotic entry delay can result because much of the germline remains within niche signaling range of the DTC (Kimble and White 1981). There is also a “latent niche” DSL ligand signal from the proximal gonad that can support germline mitotic fate if undifferentiated germ cells come in contact with the proximal gonad (McGovern et al. 2009). However, we did not observe proximal mitotic figures in these very small gonads (as in pro mutants, McGovern et al. 2009), and most samples did show evidence of meiotic entry with a well-demarcated transition zone, suggesting that germ cells are escaping the niche signal (Fig. 5c, n = 14/18).

Instead, we propose that the phenotypes we observed after prolonged rab-1 RNAi knockdown in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells represent failure to progress through meiotic pachytene (Church et al. 1995; McCarter et al. 1997; Lee et al. 2007). After 72 h on rab-1 RNAi in cells expressing the lag-2 promoter, the majority of gonads (n = 28/52) exhibited nuclear signal consistent with meiotic pachytene in the proximal-most germ cells (Fig. 5d–d′ and f). Of the remaining samples, 21/52 gonads had formed spermatids (Fig. 5e–e′ and f) and 3/52 gonads had morphology consistent with late stages of male gamete meiosis (Shakes et al. 2009), but lacked spermatids (Fig. 5f). Of the 21 gonads with spermatids, 12 also had DAPI signal consistent with at least 1 oocyte (Fig. 5f). Fertilized embryos were never observed (Fig. 5f, n = 0/52 gonads), while all control samples had fully differentiated gametes and fertilized embryos in each gonad arm (sperm and oocytes; n = 20/20 gonads).

At 96 h post-L1 arrest (24 h later, see Supplementary Table 1), the same proportion of tissue-specific rab-1 RNAi samples were arrested in meiotic pachytene (Fig. 5i). These samples also lack evidence of vulva formation (while samples with spermatids often have protruding vulvas). It is possible that this difference reflects a developmental arrest of some animals in a pregametogenic state, though their body growth clearly surpasses that of L3 larvae. We favor the interpretation that this difference reflects variability in rab-1 RNAi knockdown efficiency and therefore that the strongest rab-1 knockdown in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells causes a block of both gametogenesis and vulvagenesis. Supporting this conclusion, sar-1 RNAi in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells cause a near complete pachytene arrest (Supplementary Fig. 2g and h, n = 35/36 gonads, with 18/18 worms lacking a vulva).

A defect of pachytene exit affecting both spermatogenesis and oogenesis with similar penetrance was observed in a prior study after laser ablation of both sheath–spermathecal (SS) progenitor cells in a gonad arm (57% of gonads had sperm, only 4% of arms made a single oocyte, McCarter et al. 1997). The genetic regulation of meiotic cell cycle progression is complex, especially for the oogenic germline (Arur 2017), in which MPK-1 (the C. elegans ortholog of ERK, the primary MAPK required for germline differentiation) signaling plays a crucial role (Lee et al. 2007; Das and Arur 2022). MPK-1/MAPK signaling regulates the germline both cell-autonomously (Lee et al. 2007) and noncell-autonomously (Robinson-Thiewes et al. 2021). Nutritional inputs also regulate MPK-1/MAPK-mediated progress through meiosis in the oogenic germline through the insulin-like receptor encoded by daf-2, with neuronal insulin-like peptides proposed as the signals that activate germline DAF-2 (Lopez et al. 2013). The source and identity of the somatic gonad signal that promotes pachytene exit have not yet been identified.

We propose that by knocking down rab-1—and thereby a key step in the production of secreted and membrane-bound proteins—in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells of the reproductive system, we have identified a subset of cells (DTC, SS cells [see below], AC, vulval cells) within which may be the source of a somatic gonad pachytene exit signal, or at least a cell required for the proper development of the source of that signal (e.g. the AC is required for development of the uterus in the proximal gonad).

Considering the proximal gonad, after rab-1 RNAi in our “uterine-specific” RNAi strain, we also see a penetrant loss of differentiated germ cells and embryos (Fig. 3d–f). The fos-1 promoter is strongly expressed in the cells of the spermatheca in addition to the uterine cells (www.wormseq.org). Ablation of dorsal uterine cells did not cause pachytene exit defects (McCarter et al. 1997). We therefore favor the possibility that early rab-1 RNAi in the SS lineage is the likely point of convergence between the pachytene arrest phenotype we observe and that observed after cell ablations in the somatic gonad lineage.

Some lag-2 promoter-driven transgenes that activate in Z1 and Z4, the somatic gonad progenitor cells, show residual expression in other somatic gonad cell types later in development like the somatic gonad sheath cells (Blelloch et al. 1999; Killian and Hubbard 2005). We saw expression of the lag-2p::mNG::F2A::rde-1 rescue transgene in Z1 and Z4 and then in the SS progenitor cells for a brief time in the L2 larval stage (Supplementary Fig. 4). The SS lineage is the only point of convergence between lag-2 promoter-expressing cells and cells targeted by the SS ablation experiment that blocked pachytene progression (McCarter et al. 1997), though the lag-2 promoter is active in the SS cells for a very brief time (Supplementary Fig. 4). Further work on the sensitive developmental window in which rab-1 RNAi in lag-2 promoter-expressing cells inhibits pachytene progression may narrow down the source of a somatic signal necessary for gamete differentiation.

Conclusion

We found that 11 of the 31 Rab GTPase-encoding genes in C. elegans play a role in gonad development; these numbers are conservative, as RNAi can only implicate a gene in a developmental process, not rule out its participation. In particular, rab-1 regulates development of the somatic gonad and germline in both cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous ways. Neither germline-specific rab-1 RNAi nor rab-1 RNAi in lag-2 promoter-positive cells fully recapitulated the catastrophic gonad and germline defects we observed after whole-body rab-1 RNAi treatment (Fig. 1), so we conclude that systemic rab-1 is essential for germline and gonad growth. In the future, intestinal rab-1 should be examined for a role in gonad development, as several known intestine-expressed Rab genes (rab-10, rab-11.1, rab-11.2, and glo-1) also caused gonad defects when knocked down with whole-body RNAi (Table 1). Tissue-specific RNAi implicates cell-autonomous rab-1 in the formation of normal embryos, vulva morphogenesis, the proper development of uterine cells, and DTC migration. We find new evidence of RNAi activity during development in cells that transiently or weakly express the promoter rescuing RNAi function in a purportedly cell type-specific RNAi strain, which is important for the use of this strain in the future. The germline requires noncell-autonomous rab-1 expression for normal proliferation and for pachytene exit. Surprisingly, the least-sensitive feature of the reproductive system to rab-1 RNAi knockdown is the stem cell niche function of the DTC, which survives even strong knockdown of rab-1 in the DTC. This study motivates future investigations into the role of rab-1-independent signaling from the stem cell niche to the germline, as well as rab-1-mediated signaling to promote pachytene exit.

Supplementary Material

jkaf085_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge undergraduate lab member Kayah Takei for experimental assistance and Dave Sherwood and Eric Hastie for helpful advice. The authors thank Rob Dowen and Peter Breen for sharing RNAi clones.

Contributor Information

Noor Singh, Department of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Kayt Scott, Department of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Jayce Proctor, Department of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Kacy Lynn Gordon, Department of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Data availability

The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article, figures, and tables. Strains and plasmids are available upon request.

Supplemental material available at G3 online.

Funding

Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC), which is funded by the National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440), and are to be requested directly from CGC. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R35GM147704 to K.L.G.

Literature cited

  1. Agarwal  P, Shemesh  T, Zaidel-Bar  R. 2022. Directed cell invasion and asymmetric adhesion drive tissue elongation and turning in C. elegans gonad morphogenesis. Dev Cell. 57(17):2111–2126.e6. doi: 10.1016/J.devcel.2022.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arur  S. 2017. Signaling-mediated regulation of meiotic prophase I and transition during oogenesis. Results Probl Cell Differ. 59:101–123. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44820-6_4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashrafi  K, Chang  FY, Watts  JL, Fraser  AG, Kamath  RS, Ahringer  J, Ruvkun  G. 2003. Genome-wide RNAi analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans fat regulatory genes. Nature. 421(6920):268–272. doi: 10.1038/nature01279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Audhya  A, Desai  A, Oegema  K. 2007. A role for Rab5 in structuring the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 178(1):43–56. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200701139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blelloch  R, Anna-Arriola  SS, Gao  D, Li  Y, Hodgkin  J, Kimble  J. 1999. The gon-1 gene is required for gonadal morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 216(1):382–393. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Byrd  DT, Knobel  K, Affeldt  K, Crittenden  SL, Kimble  J. 2014. A DTC niche plexus surrounds the germline stem cell pool in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 9(2):e88372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Calixto  A, Chelur  D, Topalidou  I, Chen  X, Chalfie  M. 2010. Enhanced neuronal RNAi in C. elegans using SID-1. Nat Methods. 7(7):554–559. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. elegans Deletion Mutant Consortium . 2012. Large-scale screening for targeted knockouts in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. G3 (Bethesda). 2(11):1415–1425. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.003830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ceron  J, Rual  J-F, Chandra  A, Dupuy  D, Vidal  M, van den Heuvel  S. 2007. Large-scale RNAi screens identify novel genes that interact with the C. elegans retinoblastoma pathway as well as splicing-related components with synMuv B activity. BMC Dev Biol. 7:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-7-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Charng  WL, Yamamoto  S, Jaiswal  M, Bayat  V, Xiong  B, Zhang  K, Sandoval  H, David  G, Gibbs  S, Lu  HC, et al.  2014. Drosophila Tempura, a novel protein prenyltransferase α subunit, regulates notch signaling via Rab1 and Rab11. PLoS Biol. 12(1):1001777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen  N, Greenwald  I. 2004. The lateral signal for LIN-12/Notch in C. elegans vulval development comprises redundant secreted and transmembrane DSL proteins. Dev Cell. 6(2):183–192. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00021-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen  S, Li  L, Li  J, Liu  B, Zhu  X, Zheng  L, Zhang  R, Xu  T. 2014. SEC-10 and RAB-10 coordinate basolateral recycling of clathrin-independent cargo through endosomal tubules in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(43):15432–15437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408327111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Church  DL, Guan  KL, Lambie  EJ. 1995. Three genes of the MAP kinase cascade, mek-2, mpk-1/sur-1 and let-60 ras, are required for meiotic cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 121(8):2525–2535. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.8.2525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cinquin  O, Crittenden  SL, Morgan  DE, Kimble  J. 2010. Progression from a stem cell-like state to early differentiation in the C. elegans germ line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(5):2048–2053. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912704107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Couillault  C, Pujol  N, Reboul  J, Sabatier  L, Guichou  J-F, Kohara  Y, Ewbank  JJ. 2004. TLR-independent control of innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans by the TIR domain adaptor protein TIR-1, an ortholog of human SARM. Nat Immunol. 5(5):488–494. doi: 10.1038/ni1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Court  H, Ahearn  IM, Amoyel  M, Bach  EA, Philips  MR. 2017. Regulation of NOTCH signaling by RAB7 and RAB8 requires carboxyl methylation by ICMT. J Cell Biol. 216(12):4165–4182. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201701053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cram  EJ, Shang  H, Schwarzbauer  JE. 2006. A systematic RNA interference screen reveals a cell migration gene network in C. elegans. J Cell Sci. 119(23):4811–4818. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Das  D, Arur  S. 2022. Regulation of oocyte maturation: role of conserved ERK signaling. Mol Reprod Dev. 89(9):353–374. doi: 10.1002/mrd.23637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fernandez  AG, Gunsalus  KC, Huang  J, Chuang  L-S, Ying  N, Liang  H-L, Tang  C, Schetter  AJ, Zegar  C, Rual  J-F, et al.  2005. New genes with roles in the C. elegans embryo revealed using RNAi of ovary-enriched ORFeome clones. Genome Res. 15(2):250–259. doi: 10.1101/gr.3194805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fox  PM, Schedl  T. 2015. Analysis of germline stem cell differentiation following loss of GLP-1 notch activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 201(1):167–184. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gallegos  ME, Balakrishnan  S, Chandramouli  P, Arora  S, Azameera  A, Babushekar  A, Bargoma  E, Bokhari  A, Chava  SK, Das  P, et al.  2012. The C. elegans rab family: identification, classification and toolkit construction. PLoS One. 7(11):e49387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ghosh  S, Sternberg  PW. 2014. Spatial and molecular cues for cell outgrowth during C. elegans uterine development. Dev Biol. 396(1):121–135. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibieža  P, Prekeris  R. 2018. Rab GTPases and cell division. Small GTPases. 9(1-2):107–115. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2017.1313182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gopal  S, Amran  A, Elton  A, Ng  L, Pocock  R. 2021. A somatic proteoglycan controls Notch-directed germ cell fate. Nat Commun. 12(1):6708. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27039-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gordon  K. 2020. Recent advances in the genetic, anatomical, and environmental regulation of the C. elegans germ line progenitor zone. J Dev Biol. 8(3):14. doi: 10.3390/jdb8030014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gordon  KL, Zussman  JW, Li  X, Martin  C, Sherwood  DR. 2020. Stem cell niche exit in C. elegans via orientation and segregation of daughter cells by a cryptic cell outside the niche. Elife. 9:e56383. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gracheva  EO, Hadwiger  G, Nonet  ML, Richmond  JE. 2008. Direct interactions between C. elegans RAB-3 and Rim provide a mechanism to target vesicles to the presynaptic density. Neurosci Lett. 444(2):137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guo  P, Hu  T, Zhang  J, Jiang  S, Wang  X. 2010. Sequential action of Caenorhabditis elegans Rab GTPases regulates phagolysosome formation during apoptotic cell degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(42):18016–18021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008946107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hagedorn  EJ, Yashiro  H, Ziel  JW, Ihara  S, Wang  Z, Sherwood  DR. 2009. Integrin acts upstream of netrin signaling to regulate formation of the anchor cell's invasive membrane in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 17(2):187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Haley  R, Zhou  Z. 2021. The small GTPase RAB-35 facilitates the initiation of phagosome maturation and acts as a robustness factor for apoptotic cell clearance. Small GTPases. 12(3):188–201. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2019.1680066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hermann  GJ, Schroeder  LK, Hieb  CA, Kershner  AM, Rabbitts  BM, Fonarev  P, Grant  BD, Priess  JR. 2005. Genetic analysis of lysosomal trafficking in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell. 16(7):3273–3288. doi:0.1091/mbc.e05-01-0060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Homma  Y, Kinoshita  R, Kuchitsu  Y, Wawro  PS, Marubashi  S, Oguchi  ME, Ishida  M, Fujita  N, Fukuda  M. 2019. Comprehensive knockout analysis of the Rab family GTPases in epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 218(6):2035–2050. doi: 10.1083/JCB.201810134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang  H, Pan  J, Spielberg  DR, Hanchard  NA, Scott  DA, Burrage  LC, Dai  H, Murdock  D, Rosenfeld  JA, Mohammad  A, et al.  2022. A dominant negative variant of RAB5B disrupts maturation of surfactant protein B and surfactant protein C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 119(6):e2105228119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105228119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hubbard  EJA. 2007. Caenorhabditis elegans germ line: a model for stem cell biology. Dev Dyn. 236(12):3343–3357. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ihara  S, Hagedorn  EJ, Morrissey  MA, Chi  Q, Motegi  F, Kramer  JM, Sherwood  DR. 2011. Basement membrane sliding and targeted adhesion remodels tissue boundaries during uterine-vulval attachment in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol. 13(6):641–651. doi: 10.1038/ncb2233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kamath  RS, Ahringer  J. 2003. Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods. 30(4):313–321. doi: 10.1016/s1046-2023(03)00050-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Katz  WS, Hill  RJ, Clandinin  TR, Sternberg  PW. 1995. Different levels of the C. elegans growth factor LIN-3 promote distinct vulval precursor fates. Cell. 82(2):297–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90317-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Killian  DJ, Hubbard  EJA. 2005. Caenorhabditis elegans germline patterning requires coordinated development of the somatic gonadal sheath and the germ line. Dev Biol. 279(2):322–335. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kimble  J, Crittenden  SL. 2005. Germline proliferation and its control. WormBook. 1–14. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.13.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kimble  JE, White  JG. 1981. On the control of germ cell development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 81(2):208–219. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90284-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kinchen  JM, Doukoumetzidis  K, Almendinger  J, Stergiou  L, Tosello-Trampont  A, Sifri  CD, Hengartner  MO, Ravichandran  KS. 2008. A pathway for phagosome maturation during engulfment of apoptotic cells. Nat Cell Biol. 10(10):556–566. doi: 10.1038/ncb1718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kroetz  MB, Zarkower  D. 2015. Cell-specific mRNA profiling of the Caenorhabditis elegans somatic gonadal precursor cells identifies suites of sex-biased and gonad-enriched transcripts. G3 (Bethesda). 5:2831–2841. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.022517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kumsta  C, Hansen  M. 2012. C. elegans rrf-1 mutations maintain RNAi efficiency in the soma in addition to the germline. PLoS One. 7:e35428. doi: 10.1371/Journal.pone.0035428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee  MH, Ohmachi  M, Arur  S, Nayak  S, Francis  R, Church  D, Lambie  E, Schedl  T. 2007. Multiple functions and dynamic activation of MPK-1 extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans germline development. Genetics. 177(4):2039–2062. doi: 10.1534/GENETICS.107.081356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Levy-Strumpf  N, Krizus  M, Zheng  H, Brown  L, Culotti  JG. 2015. The Wnt frizzled receptor MOM-5 regulates the UNC-5 netrin receptor through small GTPase-dependent signaling to determine the polarity of migrating cells. PLoS Genet. 11(8):e1005446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Li  P, Merrill  SA, Jorgensen  EM, Shen  K. 2016. Two clathrin adaptor protein complexes instruct axon-dendrite polarity. Neuron. 90(3):564–580. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Li  W, Zou  W, Zhao  D, Yan  J, Zhu  Z, Lu  J, Wang  X. 2009. C. elegans Rab GTPase activating protein TBC-2 promotes cell corpse degradation by regulating the small GTPase RAB-5. Development. 136(14):2445–2455. doi: 10.1242/dev.035949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Li  X, Liu  B, Wen  Y, Wang  J, Guo  YR, Shi  A, Lin  L. 2024. Coordination of RAB-8 and RAB-11 during unconventional protein secretion. J Cell Biol. 223(2):e202306107. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202306107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li  X, Singh  N, Miller  C, Washington  I, Sosseh  B, Gordon  KL. 2022. The C. elegans gonadal sheath Sh1 cells extend asymmetrically over a differentiating germ cell population in the proliferative zone. Elife. 11:e75497. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Linden  LM, Gordon  KL, Pani  AM, Payne  SG, Garde  A, Burkholder  D, Chi  Q, Goldstein  B, Sherwood  DR. 2017. Identification of regulators of germ stem cell enwrapment by its niche in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 429(1):271–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lopez  AL  III, Chen  J, Joo  HJ, Drake  M, Shidate  M, Kseib  C, Arur  S. 2013. DAF-2 and ERK couple nutrient availability to meiotic progression during Caenorhabditis elegans oogenesis. Dev Cell. 27(2):227–240. doi: 10.1016/J.devcel.2013.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lundquist  EA. 2006. Small GTPases* (January 17, 2006). In: The C. elegans Research Community Wormbook, Lundquist EA, editor. WormBook. doi/ 10.1895/wormbook.1.67.1. [DOI]
  53. Matus  DQ, Li  XY, Durbin  S, Agarwal  D, Chi  Q, Weiss  SJ, Sherwood  DR. 2010. In vivo identification of regulators of cell invasion across basement membranes. Sci Signal. 3(10):ra35. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. McCarter  J, Bartlett  B, Dang  T, Schedl  T. 1997. Soma–germ cell interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans: multiple events of hermaphrodite germline development require the somatic sheath and spermathecal lineages. Dev Biol. 181(2):121–143. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. McGovern  M, Voutev  R, Maciejowski  J, Corsi  AK, Hubbard  EJA. 2009. A “latent niche” mechanism for tumor initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(28):11617–11622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903768106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Meighan  CM, Schwarzbauer  JE. 2007. Control of C. elegans hermaphrodite gonad size and shape by vab-3/Pax6-mediated regulation of integrin receptors. Genes Dev. 21(13):1615–1620. doi: 10.1101/gad.1534807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Morris  C, Foster  OK, Handa  S, Peloza  K, Voss  L, Somhegyi  H, Jian  Y, Vo  MV, Harp  M, Rambo  FM, et al.  2018. Function and regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans Rab32 family member GLO-1 in lysosome-related organelle biogenesis. PLoS Genet. 14(11):e1007772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Morrissey  MA, Keeley  DP, Hagedorn  EJ, McClatchey  STH, Chi  Q, Hall  DH, Sherwood  DR. 2014. B-LINK: a hemicentin, plakin, and integrin-dependent adhesion system that links tissues by connecting adjacent basement membranes. Dev Cell. 31(3):319–331. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mukhopadhyay  A, Pan  X, Lambright  DG, Tissenbaum  HA. 2007. An endocytic pathway as a target of tubby for regulation of fat storage. EMBO Rep. 8(10):931–938. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Newman  AP, White  JG, Sternberg  PW. 1996. Morphogenesis of the C. elegans hermaphrodite uterus. Development. 122(11):3617–3626. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.11.3617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nieto  C, Almendinger  J, Gysi  S, Gómez-Orte  E, Kaech  A, Hengartner  MO, Schnabel  R, Moreno  S, Cabello  J. 2010. ccz-1 mediates the digestion of apoptotic corpses in C. elegans. J Cell Sci. 123(Pt 12):2001–2007. doi: 10.1242/jcs.062331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nonet  ML, Staunton  JE, Kilgard  MP, Fergestad  T, Hartwieg  E, Horvitz  HR, Jorgensen  EM, Meyer  BJ. 1997. Caenorhabditis elegans rab-3 mutant synapses exhibit impaired function and are partially depleted of vesicles. J Neurosci. 17(21):8061–8073. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-21-08061.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Parker  SS, Cox  C, Wilson  JM. 2018. Rabs set the stage for polarity. Small GTPases. 9(1-2):116–129. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2016.1277840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Plutner  H, Cox  AD, Pind  S, Khosravi-Far  R, Bourne  JR, Schwaninger  R, Der  CJ, Balch  WE. 1991. Rab1b regulates vesicular transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and successive Golgi compartments. J Cell Biol. 115(1):31–43. doi: 10.1083/JCB.115.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Preibisch  S, Saalfeld  S, Tomancak  P. 2009. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics. 25(11):1463–1465. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Pushpa  K, Dagar  S, Kumar  H, Pathak  D, Mylavarapu  SVS. 2021. The exocyst complex regulates C. elegans germline stem cell proliferation by controlling membrane Notch levels. Development. 148(15):dev196345. doi: 10.1242/DEV.196345/271155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Robinson-Thiewes  S, Dufour  B, Martel  P-O, Lechasseur  X, Brou  AAD, Roy  V, Chen  Y, Kimble  J, Narbonne  P. 2021. Non-autonomous regulation of germline stem cell proliferation by somatic MPK-1/MAPK activity in C. elegans. Cell Rep. 35(8):109162. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Roy  D, Michaelson  D, Hochman  T, Santella  A, Bao  Z, Goldberg  JD, Hubbard  EJA. 2016. Cell cycle features of C. elegans germline stem/progenitor cells vary temporally and spatially. Dev Biol. 1(1):261–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rual  J-F, Ceron  J, Koreth  J, Hao  T, Nicot  A-S, Hirozane-Kishikawa  T, Vandenhaute  J, Orkin  SH, Hill  DE, van den Heuvel  S, et al.  2004. Toward improving Caenorhabditis elegans phenome mapping with an ORFeome-based RNAi library. Genome Res. 14(10B):2162–2168. doi: 10.1101/gr.2505604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sakaki  K, Yoshina  S, Shen  X, Han  J, DeSantis  MR, Xiong  M, Mitani  S, Kaufman  RJ. 2012. RNA surveillance is required for endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(21):8079–8084. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110589109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Salazar  CJ, Diaz-Balzac  CA, Wang  Y, Rahman  M, Grant  BD, Bülow  HE. 2024. RABR-1, an atypical Rab-related GTPase, cell-nonautonomously restricts somatosensory dendrite branching. Genetics. 228(2):iyae113. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyae113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sasidharan  N, Sumakovic  M, Hannemann  M, Hegermann  J, Liewald  JF, Olendrowitz  C, Koenig  S, Grant  BD, Rizzoli  SO, Gottschalk  A, et al.  2012. RAB-5 and RAB-10 cooperate to regulate neuropeptide release in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(46):18944–18949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203306109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sato  K, Norris  A, Sato  M, Grant  BD. 2014. C. elegans as a model for membrane traffic. WormBook. 1–47. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.77.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sato  K, Sato  M, Audhya  A, Oegema  K, Schweinsberg  P, Grant  BD. 2006. Dynamic regulation of caveolin-1 trafficking in the germ line and embryo of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell. 17(7):3085–3094. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-03-0211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sato  M, Grant  BD, Harada  A, Sato  K. 2008. Rab11 is required for synchronous secretion of chondroitin proteoglycans after fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci. 121(Pt 19):3177–3186. doi: 10.1242/jcs.034678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Schindler  AJ, Sherwood  DR. 2013. Morphogenesis of the caenorhabditis elegans vulva. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2(1):75–95. doi: 10.1002/WDEV.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Seydoux  G, Greenwald  I. 1989. Cell autonomy of lin-12 function in a cell fate decision in C. elegans. Cell. 57(7):1237–1245. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90060-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Shafaq-Zadah  M, Gomes-Santos  CS, Bardin  S, Maiuri  P, Maurin  M, Iranzo  J, Gautreau  A, Lamaze  C, Caswell  P, Goud  B, et al.  2015. Persistent cell migration and adhesion rely on retrograde transport of β1 integrin. Nat Cell Biol. 18(1):54–64. doi: 10.1038/ncb3287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Shakes  DC, Wu  JC, Sadler  PL, LaPrade  K, Moore  LL, Noritake  A, Chu  DS. 2009. Spermatogenesis-specific features of the meiotic program in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 5(8):e1000611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Sherwood  DR, Sternberg  PW. 2003. Anchor cell invasion into the vulval epithelium in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 5(1):21–31. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00168-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Shi  A, Chen  CCH, Banerjee  R, Glodowski  D, Audhya  A, Rongo  C, Grant  BD. 2010. EHBP-1 Functions with RAB-10 during endocytic recycling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell. 21(16):2930–2943. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e10-02-0149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Simmer  F, Moorman  C, van der Linden  AM, Kuijk  E, van den Berghe  PVE, Kamath  RS, Fraser  AG, Ahringer  J, Plasterk  RHA. 2003. Genome-wide RNAi of C. elegans using the hypersensitive rrf-3 strain reveals novel gene functions. PLoS Biol. 1(1):E12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Singh  N, Zhang  P, Li  KJ, Gordon  KL. 2024. The Rac pathway prevents cell fragmentation in a nonprotrusively migrating leader cell during C. elegans gonad organogenesis. Curr Biol. 34(11):2387–2402.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sternberg  PW, Van Auken  K, Wang  Q, Wright  A, Yook  K, Zarowiecki  M, Arnaboldi  V, Becerra  A, Brown  S, Cain  S, et al.  2024. WormBase 2024: status and transitioning to Alliance infrastructure. Genetics. 227(1):iyae050. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyae050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Stiernagle  T. 2006. Maintenance of C. elegans. WormBook. 1–11. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Takenaka  M, Inoue  H, Takeshima  A, Kakura  T, Hori  T. 2013. C. elegans Rassf homolog, rasf-1, is functionally associated with rab-39 Rab GTPase in oxidative stress response. Genes Cells. 18(3):203–210. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Templeman  NM, Murphy  CT. 2018. Regulation of reproduction and longevity by nutrient-sensing pathways. J Cell Biol. 217(1):93–106. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201707168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. tm2052 (variation)—WormBase: Nematode Information Resource. [accessed 2024 Nov 24]. https://wormbase.org/species/c_elegans/variation/WBVar00250998#02-456-10.
  89. Wang  C, Yoo  Y, Fan  H, Kim  E, Guan  KL, Guan  JL. 2010. Regulation of integrin β1 recycling to lipid rafts by rab1a to promote cell migration. J Biol Chem. 285(38):29398–29405. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.141440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang  M, Sternberg  PW. 2000. Patterning of the C. elegans 1° vulval lineage by RAS and Wnt pathways. Development. 127(23):5047–5058. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.23.5047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhang  H, Squirrell  JM, White  JG. 2008. RAB-11 permissively regulates spindle alignment by modulating metaphase microtubule dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans early embryos. Mol Biol Cell. 19(6):2553–2565. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-09-0862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhang  X, Greenwald  I. 2011. Spatial regulation of lag-2 transcription during vulval precursor cell fate patterning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 188(4):847–858. doi: 10.1534/GENETICS.111.128389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Zou  W, Yadav  S, DeVault  L, Nung Jan  Y, Sherwood  DR. 2015. RAB-10-dependent membrane transport is required for dendrite arborization. PLoS Genet. 11:e1005484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jkaf085_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article, figures, and tables. Strains and plasmids are available upon request.

Supplemental material available at G3 online.


Articles from G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES