Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1976 Jun;83(2):303–321. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.2.303

Chloroplast Genetics of Chlamydomonas. I. Allelic Segregation Ratios

Ruth Sager 1, Zenta Ramanis 1
PMCID: PMC1213515  PMID: 17248716

Abstract

This paper presents allelic segregation data from a series of 16 crosses segregated for nuclear and chloroplast genes. By means of pedigree analysis, segregants of chloroplast markers occurring in the zygote have been distinguished from those occurring in zoospore clones. The genes ac1, ac2, and tm1 showed little if any deviation from 1:1 either in zygotic segregation or in zoospore clones. The genes sm2, ery, and spc showed a significant excess of the allele from the mt + parent in zygotes. However, in zoospores, mt + excess was seen only when that allele was the mutant (resistant) form but not when it was wild type (sensitive).

These results show that the extent of preferential segregation differs in zygotes and in zoospores, and that preferential segregation is influenced by map location and by allele specificity. A comparison of progeny from zygotes mated after 0, 15'', 30'', and 50'' UV irradiation of the mt+ gametes demonstrated the lack of an effect of UV upon allelic segregation ratios. In total, these results exclude the multi-copy model of chloroplast genome segregation suggested by Gillham, Boynton and Lee (1974) and support the diploid model we have previously proposed (Sager and Ramanis 1968, 1970; Sager 1972).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bastia D., Chiang K. S., Swift H., Siersma P. Heterogeneity, complexity, and repetition of the chloroplast DNA of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jun;68(6):1157–1161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.6.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boynton J. E., Burton W. G., Gillham N. W., Harris E. H. Can a non-Mendelian mutation affect both chloroplast and mithchondrial ribosomes? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3463–3467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fogel S., Mortimer R. K. Recombination in yeast. Annu Rev Genet. 1971;5:219–236. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.05.120171.001251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schlanger G., Sager R. Localization of five antibiotic resistances at the subunit level in chloroplast ribosomes of Chlamydomonas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 May;71(5):1715–1719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schlanger G., Sager R., Ramanis Z. Mutation of a cytoplasmic gene in Chlamydomonas alters chlorplast ribosome function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Dec;69(12):3551–3555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.12.3551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Singer B., Sager R., Ramanis Z. Chloroplast Genetics of Chlamydomonas. III. Closing the Circle. Genetics. 1976 Jun;83(2):341–354. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.2.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wells R., Sager R. Denaturation and the renaturation kinetics of chloroplast DNA from Chlamydomonas reinhardi. J Mol Biol. 1971 Jun 14;58(2):611–622. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90375-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES