Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1976 Sep;84(1):77–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.1.77

Environmental Determination of Selective Significance or Neutrality of Amylase Variants in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

G De Jong 1, W Scharloo 1
PMCID: PMC1213567  PMID: 825413

Abstract

Strains homozygous at the amylase locus were derived from a polymorphic laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster. The Amy 4,6 strain has higher enzyme activity than the Amy1 strain.——Maltose has the same nutritional value as starch.——The effect of starch in pure culture depends on the yeast level. At low yeast level increasing starch increases survival, at high yeast level increasing starch increases mean dry weight. The strains do not differ in survival or mean dry weight in pure culture.——In mixed cultures at 50% input of Amy 4,6 and Amy1 as larvae the percentage Amy4,6 in adults increases with increasing starch at low yeast levels, but equals input frequency at high yeast levels. No increase in percentage Amy4,6 in adults is present with increasing maltose at low yeast levels in mixed culture. The increase in percentage Amy4,6 with increasing starch must be due to selection on the amylase locus working by competition for food in the larval stage. The single locus selection coefficient is determined by the environment and can reach quite high values.——Viability selection in the presence of starch is in the direction indicated by the enzyme activities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayala F. J., Tracey M. L., Barr L. G., McDonald J. F., Pérez-Salas S. Genetic variation in natural populations of five Drosophila species and the hypothesis of the selective neutrality of protein polymorphisms. Genetics. 1974 Jun;77(2):343–384. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doane W. W. Quantitation of amylases in Drosophila separated by acrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Exp Zool. 1967 Apr;164(3):363–377. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401640307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Karlin S., Lieberman U. Random temporal variation in selection intensities: case of large population size. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Dec;6(3):355–382. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90016-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Maruyama T., Kimura M. Geographical unifromity of selectively neutral polymorphisms. Nature. 1974 May 3;249(452):30–32. doi: 10.1038/249030a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ota T. Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism. Nature. 1974 Nov 29;252(5482):351–354. doi: 10.1038/252351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Powell J. R. Apparent selection of enzyme alleles in laboratory populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 1973 Nov;75(3):557–570. doi: 10.1093/genetics/75.3.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prakash S., Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):841–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vigue C. L., Johnson F. M. Isozyme variability in species of the genus Drosophila. VI. Frequency-property-environment relationships of allelic alcohol dehydrogenases in D. melanogaster. Biochem Genet. 1973 Jul;9(3):213–227. doi: 10.1007/BF00485735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. de Jong G., Hoorn A. J., Thörig G. E., Scharloo W. Frequencies of amylase variants in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1972 Aug 25;238(5365):453–454. doi: 10.1038/238453a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES