Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1976 Dec;84(4):791–805. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.4.791

The Organization of Genetic Diversity in the Parthenogenetic Lizard CNEMIDOPHORUS TESSELATUS

E Davis Parker Jr 1, Robert K Selander 1
PMCID: PMC1213610  PMID: 1010315

Abstract

The parthenogenetic lizard species Cnemidophorus tesselatus is composed of diploid populations formed by hybridization of the bisexual species C. tigris and C. septemvittatus, and of triploid populations derived from a cross between diploid tesselatus and a third bisexual species, C. sexlineatus. An analysis of allozymic variation in proteins encoded by 21 loci revealed that, primarily because of hybrid origin, individual heterozygosity in tesselatus is much higher (0.560 in diploids and 0.714 in triploids) than in the parental bisexual species (mean, 0.059). All triploid individuals apparently represent a single clone, but 12 diploid clones were identified on the basis of genotypic diversity occurring at six loci. From one to four clones were recorded in each population sampled. Three possible sources of clonal diversity in the diploid parthenogens were identified: mutation at three loci has produced three clones, each confined to a single locality; genotypic diversity at two loci apparently caused by multiple hybridization of the bisexual species accounts for four clones; and the remaining five clones apparently have arisen through recombination at three loci. The relatively limited clonal diversity of tesselatus suggests a recent origin. The evolutionary potential of tesselatus and of parthenogenetic forms in general may be less severely limited than has generally been supposed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (969.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asher J. H., Jr Parthenogenesis and genetic variability. II. One-locus models for various diploid populations. Genetics. 1970 Oct;66(2):369–391. doi: 10.1093/genetics/66.2.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. King J. L., Ohta T. Polyallelic mutational equilibria. Genetics. 1975 Apr;79(4):681–691. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.4.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Levy M., Levin D. A. Genic Heterozygosity and Variation in Permanent Translocation Heterozygotes of the OENOTHERA BIENNIS Complex. Genetics. 1975 Mar;79(3):493–512. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MACGREGOR H. C., UZZELL T. M., Jr GYNOGENESIS IN SALAMANDERS RELATED TO AMBYSTOMA JEFFERSONIANUM. Science. 1964 Mar 6;143(3610):1043–1045. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3610.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nei M., Roychoudhury A. K. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):379–390. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stanley S. M. Clades versus clones in evolution: why we have sex. Science. 1975 Oct 24;190(4212):382–383. doi: 10.1126/science.1179215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Suomalainen E., Saura A. Genetic polymorphism and evolution in parthenogenetic animals. I. Polyploid curculionidae. Genetics. 1973 Jul;74(3):489–508. doi: 10.1093/genetics/74.3.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES