Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Jan 30;90(6):2500–2509. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.4c03142

Organophotoredox-Driven Three-Component Synthesis of β‑Trifluoromethyl β‑Amino Ketones

Pau Sarró 1, Roser Pleixats 1, Carolina Gimbert-Suriñach 1,*, Adelina Vallribera 1,*, Albert Granados 1,*
PMCID: PMC12136134  PMID: 39882838

Abstract

In this work, we present a photoredox three-component reaction that enables the synthesis of medicinally relevant β-trifluoromethyl β-amino ketones from a N-trifluoroethylhydroxylamine derivative, styrenes and DMSO. Remarkably, fluoromethyl, difluoromethyl and pentafluoroethyl analogues are also accessed using the same reaction conditions. The mechanistic investigations, including radical trapping experiments, cyclic voltammetry, Stern–Volmer quenching studies and isotope labelling experiments support the photoinduced radical/polar crossover and Kornblum-type oxidation mechanisms. Finally, the applicability of the accessed organic skeletons is showcased by notable derivatization reactions.


graphic file with name jo4c03142_0010.jpg


graphic file with name jo4c03142_0008.jpg

Introduction

The trifluoromethyl substituent has widespread within organic compounds, representing one of the most popular fluorinated groups. Particularly, this moiety has proven to be key in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals and materials chemistry. The extraordinary properties provided such as lipophilicity or metabolic stability are recognized factors that directly impact the physicochemical behavior and biological activity. Notably, the α-trifluoromethylamine unit is present in many biologically relevant molecules, which is not surprising given the unique properties provided when replacing H by fluorine atoms at the α-Me of an amine moiety. The amine basicity modulation and the inherent geometry of this structure constitutes itself as an extraordinarily attractive scaffold in medical chemist’s toolbox. These properties enable α-CF3 amines to behave as a bioisostere for amide functional group with an interesting higher resistance toward proteolytic cleavage (Scheme ). β-Trifluoromethyl β-amino ketones represent an important class of trifluoromethylated building blocks in biochemistry and pharmacology settings. Their chemical synthesis typically utilized enolates derived from organic ketone/aldehyde carbonyls via Mannich-type reactions. However, these protocols based on two-electron processes require metal catalysts, operationally demanding conditions or elaborated starting materials. Great efforts have been made to provide diastereo- or enantio-enriched β-trifluoromethyl β-amino ketones, for example asymmetric derivatives can be accessed via N-heterocyclic carbene organocatalysis. Recently, hydroxylamine-derived compounds have proven to be effective nitrogen-centered radical precursors. For example, in 2022 Huang and Xu described iridium-based photoredox methods for the N-trifluoromethylamination of organic skeletons. Particularly, N-trifluoroethyl hydroxylamine reagents (Scheme A) have shown to serve as suitable N-based radicals under suitable reductive conditions (radical synthon A in Scheme A). Remarkably, the generated radical can undergo intramolecular 1,2-hydrogen atom transfer (1,2-HAT) under the appropriate reaction conditions to yield a valuable C-centered radical (B in Scheme A). Last year, a ruthenium-based reductive quenching photoredox approach using Hantzsch Ester as a sacrificial electron-donor, enabled the gem-difluoroallylation of α-trifluoromethylamines by employing captodative α-trifluoromethylstyrenes as radical acceptors.

1. Properties of α-Trifluoromethyl Amines as Bioisosteres of the Amide Functional Group.

1

2. (A) Synthetic Opportunities after Reduction of N-Trifluoroethyl Hydroxylamine Reagents; (B) Reaction Design for the Photoinduced Three-Component Synthesis of β-Trifluoromethyl β-Amino Ketones via 1,2-HAT.

2

To date, three-component synthetic methods for assembling β-trifluoromethyl β-amino ketones are unknown yet challenging. We have developed a difunctionalization transformation employing a N-trifluoroethyl hydroxylamine derivative as a redox-active species, styrenes, and DMSO (Scheme B) through an oxidative quenching photoredox cycle, an underexplored activation mode in this context. This photoredox difunctionalization process represents the first visible light mediated synthesis of β-CF3 β-amino carbonyls. Notably, this strategy expedites high molecular complexity in a single step and from simple and readily accessible starting materials. Such chemical scaffolds serve as valuable intermediates with the potential to give rise to more complex and interesting molecules, such as azirines or pyrazoles.

Results and Discussion

To evaluate the tenability of this approach, styrene 1a was selected as model substrate and we selected two different photocatalysts, the organometallic Ir­(ppy)3 (where ppy is 2-phenylpyridine) and the organic 4DPAIPN (1,3-dicyano- 2,4,5,6-tetrakis­(diphenylamino)-benzene). Pleasingly, both photocatalysts facilitated the desired transformation without the need for additives in excellent yields (Table , entries 1–2). We selected the more accessible and sustainable organic dye as a suitable photocatalyst. Of note, this transformation is completed after only 4 h of illumination (Table , entries 2–4). Finally, control studies verified that each component of the reaction was necessary (Table , entries 5–7) and the involvement of open-shell species since the addition of TEMPO impaired the reactivity (Table , entry 8).

1. Keto-Alkylation of Styrenes: Optimization of Reaction Conditions .

graphic file with name jo4c03142_0005.jpg

entry PC time (h) yield (%)
1 Ir(ppy)3 16 97
2 4DPAIPN 16 98
3 4DPAIPN 4 97
4 4DPAIPN 1 46
5 none 4 0
6 4DPAIPN 4 0
7 4DPAIPN 4 0
8 4DPAIPN 4 0
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol, 1 equiv), 2a (0.2 mmol, 2 equiv), PC (2 mol %) in 1 mL of degassed DMSO (c = 0.1 M) under 427 nm Kessil lamp irradiation at rt.

b

Yields determined by1H NMR analysis.

c

No light experiment.

d

MeCN as solvent and ambient atmosphere.

e

5 equiv of TEMPO added.

f

PC = photocatalyst.

With suitable conditions established, the scope of this difunctionalization process was assessed. First, we focused on examining styrene diversity (Table ). An array of olefinic substrates were competent in the presented difunctionalization process. Monosubstitutions at para position afforded the desired compounds from good to excellent yields (39). Both electron-donating and moderate electron-withdrawing groups could be well tolerated.

2. Substrate Scope Evaluation for the Photoinduced Three-Component Keto-Alkylation Process .

graphic file with name jo4c03142_0006.jpg

graphic file with name jo4c03142_0007.jpg

a

General reaction conditions: 1 (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv), 2ad (0.50 mmol, 2 equiv), 4DPAIPN (2 mol %) in DMSO (2.5 mL, 0.1 M), under Kessil lamp irradiation (λmax = 427 nm) at rt for 4hours.

b

From 2.0 mmol of 4-tert-butylstyrene.

Unfortunately, nonaromatic alkenes and strong electron-withdrawing groups tethered to the phenyl ring of the styrene, such as formyl, trifluoromethyl or carboxyl, and pyridine-derived alkenes did not produce the product, thus falling beyond the substrate scope of this transformation (see Table and Supporting Information). This can be attributed to the electronic nature of the benzylic radical intermediate species that has to be oxidized in the last step of the mechanism, necessary to close the photocatalytic cycle (vide infra). Remarkably, this method is not limited to 4-substituted styrenes, but also ortho- and meta-substituted derivatives also produced the desired carbonyls in yields ranging from 41% to 73%. The para- (9), meta- (10), and ortho- (11) brominated regioisomers were isolated in 62%, 41%, and 53% yields, respectively. These results demonstrate the general applicability of this protocol, despite the lower yields observed in certain cases due to steric and electronic factors. Finally, complex styrene-derived small molecules such as the medicinally relevant bicyclopentane unit (13), anti-inflammatory ibuprofen (14) and d-galactopyranose (15) can be converted to the corresponding β-trifluoromethyl β-amino ketones in high yields, proving its potential application for late-stage functionalization environments. Given the efficiency of the developed protocol, we scaled up 8-fold in batch using regular glassware and the same light source. Using 4-tert-butylstyrene as model alkene we observed same efficacy (90% yield, 3).

Next, given that high efficiency of the reaction we sought to explore further the reactivity by replacing the CF3 group with other relevant fluorinated scaffolds (Table ), such as pentafluoroethyl (CF2CF3), difluoromethyl (CF2H), and fluoromethyl (CH2F). These substitutions were chosen to investigate the impact of varying degrees of fluorination on the reaction outcomes. The introduction of the CF2CF3 group is expected to influence the electronic and steric properties more significantly compared to the CF3 group. Substitution with the less fluorinated moiety CF2H, normally provides insight into the role of the hydrogen atom in modulating reactivity and selectivity. Lastly, the single fluorine atom in the CH2F group was chosen to explore the impact of minimal fluorination, offering unique electronic and steric effects and serving as a CH2OH bioisostere. Overall, these substitutions will allow for a comprehensive understanding of how varying degrees and patterns of fluorination can influence the reactivity, selectivity, and overall efficiency. Initially, novel redox-active species 2b (Table ) was synthesized in good yield (see Supporting Information for details). Then, when applying the optimal conditions, we successfully synthesized five different products by varying the substitution patterns on the aromatic phenyl ring (1620). The yields of these products ranged from 38% to 72%, demonstrating the influence of substituent positioning and electronic effects on the reaction efficiency. First, para-styrenes yielded the desired products from moderate to good yields, observing best results with moderate electron-donating groups ( t Bu, 17) and moderate electron-withdrawing (F, 19). The strong activating OMe group facilitated the formation of the desired product, albeit in slightly less efficacy. Then, an ortho-substituted styrene was efficiently keto-alkylated in a good 65% yield (16). Finally, a more complex styrene derivative also gave access to the desired pentafluoroalkylated compound (20) in moderate yield. Subsequently, we evaluated the tenability of this difunctionalization process utilizing the difluoromethylated reagent 2c. In general, this transformation allowed the formation of the targeted molecules, although in less efficacy. In contrast to similar organic skeletons with the CF2H unit present at a β-carbonyl position, the synthesized compounds could be purified by flash column chromatography without compromising its structure. Importantly, this acetophenone-derivative synthesis is not only accessed from simple styrene, but also more complex organic cores can be prepared, such as d-galactopyranose (24). Finally, the substrate scope was extended to the preparation of monofluorinated analogues. In this case, we unlocked the preparation of the monofluorinated redox-active hydroxylamine 2d (see Supporting Information), and then we demonstrated that our conditions could be also successfully applied. Significantly, styrenes with different electronic properties were amenable and we could prepare 25, 26 and 27 in good chemical yields (28–62%). Nonfluorinated hydroxylamines were ineffective (see Supporting Information).

We propose that a photoinduced net-neutral radical/polar crossover process enables this difunctionalization reaction via oxidative quenching. To prove our hypothesis, we conducted mechanistic experiments including Stern–Volmer luminescence quenching studies, cyclic voltammetry, isotopic labeling and radical trapping experiments. First, to determine which species is quenching the photocatalyst’s excited state, binary mixtures of photocatalyst and model reagents were prepared. Fluorimetry experiments determined that the photocatalyst/2a combination showed more effective 4DPAIPN* quenching than the mixture with the alkene. This resulted in an observed K SV of 96.8 M–1 (see Scheme A and Supporting Information). Next, to investigate the feasibility of a single-electron transfer (SET) event between 4DPAIPN* and hydroxylamine derived compounds 2ad we conducted cyclic voltammetry experiments. The redox potentials of the fluorinated redox active reagents (2ad) were measured (see Supporting Information for details). The set of the four species showed irreversible reduction waves with E red values that ranged from −1.90 to −1.98 V vs Fc+/Fc (Scheme B). Importantly, these results support that 4DPAIPN* can thermodynamically (E red PC*/PC + = −1.98 V vs Fc+/Fc) undergo SET with reagents 2ad. Finally, the radical and photochemical nature of this transformation was confirmed when the reaction was inhibited in the presence of TEMPO or in the absence of photocatalyst or light illumination (see Table entries 5–7).

3. (A) Stern–Volmer Plots for Luminescence Quenching of 4DPAIPN by p-tert-Butylstyrene 1a (green) and Redox-Active Species 2a (blue) (See the Supporting Information for Experimental Details); (B) Cyclic Voltammetry of Redox Active Species 2ad, See the Supporting Information for Further Details; (C) Isotope Labelling Experiment; (D) Proposed Mechanism for the Three-Component Synthesis of β-Alkyl β-Amino Ketones.

3

To gain deeper understanding into the oxidation process mediated by DMSO, we performed isotope-labeling experiments using DMSO-d 6 as the solvent (Scheme C). Notably, alongside the desired compound 3, we observed the formation of pentadeuterated dimethyl sulfide as the main side product, as well as deuterated p-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid by GCMS (see Supporting Information). These findings suggest that the benzoate derivative abstracts a deuterium atom from the in situ-formed sulfonium intermediate (Scheme D).

Overall, the presented mechanistic evidence depicted above and related literature ,, favor to detail the operative mechanism for this transformation in Scheme D. Upon photoirradiation under Kessil lamp, organic 4DPAIPN species achieves its excited state (PC*) that accomplishes single electron reduction of 2, generating the radical anion intermediate I . Next, species I undergoes O–N bond scission producing the N-centered radical II and the benzoate-derivative. Subsequently, II produces a synthetically useful carbon-centered radical III via efficient 1,2-hydrogen atom transfer (1,2-HAT) process, which engages in a Giese addition with an alkene ( IV ). The Giese adduct IV is oxidized further by PC + through SET event, producing the carbocation V and returning the photocatalyst back to its neutral ground state. Finally, the resulting cationic species V is trapped by DMSO, leading to the formation of a sulfonium cation. Subsequent deprotonation by the benzoate species generates a sulfonium ylide, which undergoes an intramolecular attack on the benzylic proton, ultimately yielding the final ketone.

To showcase the versatility of the presented photoredox method, a series of different derivatization reactions were conducted. These reactions highlighted the product’s broad applicability and efficiency in modifying substrate 3, prepared in a 2 mmol scale, through either the carbonyl or the nitrogen moiety under mild reaction conditions (Scheme ). First, NHBoc deprotection (28) and carbonyl reduction (29) afforded the corresponding products in excellent yields. Next, we evaluated the preparation of interesting heterocyclic compounds. Pyrazole 30 was accessed in 51% yield via diazonium salt intermediate, while strained trifluoromethylated azidirine 31 was isolated after a two-step process from 3 in 84% yield.

4. Downstream Transformations from 3 (See Supporting Information for Details).

4

Conclusions

In summary, we have unraveled the synthesis of β-trifluoromethyl β-amino ketones from readily available styrenes in a single step via organophotoredox conditions. This three-component protocol increases molecular complexity not only in β-CF3 β-amino ketones but also in CF2H, CF2CF3, and CH2F settings. Also, we demonstrate the first application of an oxidative quenching photoredox cycle in a three-component reaction with fluorinated hydroxylamine reagents 2ad, offering a mechanistic alternative to reductive quenching systems. The efficiency and robustness of the reaction are remarkable, achieving high yields in both small- and large-scale synthesis, and it is applicable to late-stage functionalization. Mechanistic investigations support the operation of the reaction via photoinduced radical/polar crossover, and the applicability of this method is showcased by downstream derivatization reactions.

Experimental Section

General Information

All chemical transformations requiring inert atmosphere were done using Schlenk line techniques. For violet light irradiation, a Kessil PR160-violet LED lamp (30 W High Luminous DEX 2100 LED, λmax = 427 nm) was placed 4 cm away from the reaction vials. Photoinduced reactions were performed using 4 or 8 mL Chemglass vials (15–425 Green Open Top Cap, TFE Septa). Reactions were monitored by TLC or NMR. TLC analysis was performed using hexanes/EtOAc mixtures as the eluent unless specified and visualized using UV light and/or Vanillin solution. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments were performed with a BioLogic SP-50 Single Channel Potentiostat in a one-compartment three-electrode setup using a glassy carbon disk as the working electrode (ø = 3 mm), platinum wire as the auxiliary electrode, and SCE or AgNO3/Ag (0.01 M AgNO3, 0.1 M [ n Bu4N]­PF6 (TBAPF6), MeCN) as reference electrodes. CV were performed at room temperature using the appropriate solvent, degassing with argon for 60 s and using TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte (0.1 M). All the experiments were referred to ferrocene as an internal standard. Polishing of the working electrode has been done using an alumina polishing pad with a solution of 0.05 μm alumina in water (purchased from BAS INC.). NMR experiments (1H, 13C, 19F) were performed in the Servei de Ressonància Magnètica Nuclear, UAB, using NEO 300, NEO 400, NEO 500, or NEO 600 spectrometers. Chemical shifts are referenced to residual, nondeuterated CHCl3 (δ 7.26 in 1H NMR and 77.16 in 13C NMR). The HRMS (ESI+) and elemental analyses were done by the Servei d’Anàlisi Química of UAB and Parque Científico Tecnológico of UBU. HRMS is determined by a Bruker microTOF-QII mass spectrometer (fly time analyzer) through positive electrospray ionization. IR spectra were recorded on an FT-IR PerkinElmer using either neat oil or solid products. Fluorescence measurements were obtained using septa-capped UV-Quartz cuvettes (10 mm path length) from Hellma Analytics and were recorded in a PerkinElmer LS 55 Fluorescence Spectrometer attached to a PTP 1 Peltier Temperature Programmer maintaining the temperature at 25 °C. Melting points (°C) are uncorrected. Deuterated NMR solvents were purchased from Eurisotop. Dry solvents were obtained from Aldrich or Fisher and used as received. Bulk DCM, EtOAc and hexane were purchased from VWR. Chemicals were purchased from Fluorochem and Merck and used as received unless specified.

General Procedure for the Photoinduced Synthesis of Fluorinated β-Amino Ketones (327)

To an 8 mL Chemglass vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, the corresponding styrene 1(0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 4DPAIPN (0.02 equiv) and the corresponding hydroxylamine 2 (0.50 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were added. Then, 2.5 mL of dry DMSO were added under inert atmosphere and the reaction was degassed with Argon for 20 s. The reaction mixture was irradiated for 4 h with a 427 nm Kessil PR160-purple LED as described in the “Workflow” section (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). The temperature of the reaction was maintained at approximately 25 °C via a fan. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with AcOEt (10 mL) and washed with brine (3 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was subjected to flash column chromatography purification using hexanes/EtOAc mixtures to yield the desired compound. Caution! Proper protective eyewear, specifically goggles designed to shield against the emitted wavelengths, was used to prevent potential eye damage from prolonged exposure to the light source. Researchers are advised to take similar precautions when reproducing this work.

Tert-Butyl (4-(4-(Tert-Butyl)­phenyl)-1,1,1-trifluoro-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (3)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1a (40 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 3 was obtained as a white solid (88 mg, 0.24 mmol, 94%). R f = 0.49 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 112–114 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.89 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.36 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.99–4.84 (m, 1H), 3.42–3.25 (m, 2H), 1.45 (s, 9H), 1.36 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 194.9, 157.7, 154.7, 133.6, 128.1, 125.8, 125.2 (q, J = 281.8 Hz), 80.6, 49.1 (q, J = 31.6 Hz), 36.6, 35.2, 31.0, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.7. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3323, 2966, 2922, 2872, 1688, 1532, 1367, 1349, 1305, 1249, 1155, 1108, 1054, 1027, 991. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C19H27F3NO3 [M + H]+: 374.1938; found, 374.1943.

4-(3-((Tert-Butoxycarbonyl)­amino)-4,4,4-trifluorobutanoyl)­phenyl Acetate (4)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1b (41 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 4 was obtained as a pale yellow solid (76 mg, 0.20 mmol, 82%). R f = 0.10 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 7:1 (v/v)); mp 131–133 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 8.00 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.22 (m, 1H), 4.98–4.89 (m, 1H), 3.36–3.29 (m, 2H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 1.47 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.9, 168.7, 154.9, 154.9, 133.7, 129.8, 125.2 (q, J = 281.7 Hz), 122.1, 80.8, 49.4 (q, J = 28.9 Hz), 36.8, 28.2, 21.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.7. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3342, 2980, 2931, 1761, 1697, 1600, 1528, 1368, 1299, 1248, 1195, 1163, 1125, 1016. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C17H20F3NO5Na [M + Na]+: 398.1186; found, 398.1195.

Tert-Butyl (1,1,1-Trifluoro-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (5)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1c (34 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 7:3), the title compound 5 was obtained as a pale yellow solid (76 mg, 0.22 mmol, 88%). R f = 0.13 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 149–151 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.94 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H), 5.32 (s, 1H), 4.95–4.86 (m, 1H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.36–3.25 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.7, 164.1, 154.7, 130.5, 129.3, 125.2 (q, J = 281.7 Hz), 114.0, 80.6, 55.6, 49.2 (q, J = 29.8 Hz), 36.3, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.7. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3318, 2974, 2983, 2844, 1680, 1602, 1577, 1511, 1421, 1362, 1291, 1248, 1234, 1156, 1119, 1026, 989. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C16H21F3NO4 [M + H]+: 348.1417; found, 348.1426.

Tert-Butyl (1,1,1-Trifluoro-4-oxo-4-phenylbutan-2-yl)­carbamate (6)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1d (26 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 6 was obtained as a white solid (40 mg, 0.13 mmol, 50%). R f = 0.31 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 129–131 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.96 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 5.29 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 4.98–4.89 (m, 1H), 3.41–3.32 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 195.2, 154.7, 136.2, 133.8, 128.9, 128.1, 125.2 (q, J = 282.2 Hz), 80.7, 49.1 (q, J = 31.7 Hz), 36.8, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.8. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3391, 2982, 2926, 1713, 1685, 1513, 1354, 1317, 1301, 1286, 1241, 1179, 1149, 1048, 1022, 999. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C15H19F3NO3 [M + H]+: 318.1312; found, 318.1309.

Tert-Butyl (1,1,1-Trifluoro-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (7)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1e (31 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 7 was obtained as a white solid (67 mg, 0.20 mmol, 81%). R f = 0.36 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 143–144 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.99 (dd, J = 8.9, 5.3 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 5.25 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 4.94–4.91 (m, 1H), 3.39–3.29 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.5, 166.1 (d, J = 256.0 Hz), 154.7, 132.6 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 130.8 (d, J = 9.2 Hz), 125.1 (q, J = 281.8 Hz), 116.0 (d, J = 22.1 Hz), 80.8, 49.1 (q, J = 30.8 Hz), 36.8, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −103.8, −75.8. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3354, 2987, 2940, 2920, 1696, 1686, 1594, 1522, 1346, 1300, 1285, 1250, 1231, 1158, 115, 1060, 993. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C15H17F4NO3Na [M + Na]+: 358.1037; found, 358.1050.

Tert-Butyl (4-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trifluoro-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (8)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1f (35 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 8 was obtained as a white solid (72 mg, 0.21 mmol, 82%). R f = 0.39 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 64–66 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.90 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 5.22 (m, 1H), 4.95–4.89 (m, 1H), 3.35–3.29 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.9, 154.6, 140.4, 134.5, 129.5, 129.2, 125.1 (q, J = 281.7 Hz), 80.8, 49.1 (q, J = 30.2 Hz), 36.9, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.8. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3360, 2967, 2924, 2854, 1698, 1524, 1492, 1368, 1324, 1249, 1145, 1080, 1049, 1013, 972. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C15H17ClF3NO3Na [M + Na]+: 374.0741; found, 374.0750.

Tert-Butyl (4-(4-Bromophenyl)-1,1,1-trifluoro-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (9)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1g (46 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 9 was obtained as a pale yellow solid (62 mg, 0.16 mmol, 62%). R f = 0.42 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 136–138 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.82 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.23 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.95–4.87 (m, 1H), 3.38–3.28 (m, 2H), 1.46 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 194.1, 154.6, 134.9, 132.2, 129.6, 129.1, 125.1 (q, J = 281.7 Hz), 80.8, 49.1 (q, J = 31.3 Hz), 36.9, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.8. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3348, 2957, 2923, 2854, 1704, 1687, 1493, 1460, 1364, 1302, 1275, 1259, 1180, 1079, 1022, 1011, 965. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C15H17BrF3NO3Na [M + Na]+: 418.0236; found, 418.0244.

Tert-Butyl (4-(3-Bromophenyl)-1,1,1-trifluoro-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (10)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1h (46 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 10 was obtained as a white solid (40 mg, 0.10 mmol, 41%). R f = 0.31 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 129–131 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 5.06–4.85 (m, 1H), 3.32 (s, 2H), 1.47 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.8, 154.6, 137.8, 136.7, 131.2, 130.4, 126.6, 125.1 (q, J = 282.1 Hz), 123.3, 80.8, 49.0 (q, J = 32.2 Hz), 37.1, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.8. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3349, 2979, 1701, 1689, 1522, 1307, 1282, 1225, 1150, 1118, 1049, 1023, 991. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C15H17BrF3NO3Na [M + Na]+: 418.0236; found, 418.0244.

Tert-Butyl (4-(2-Bromophenyl)-1,1,1-trifluoro-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (11)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1i (46 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 11 was obtained as a white solid (53 mg, 0.13 mmol, 53%). R f = 0.31 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 115–117 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.65 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.35 (m, 1H), 5.17 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 4.90–4.81 (m, 1H), 3.41–3.29 (m, 2H), 1.48 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 199.1, 154.5, 140.4, 133.9, 132.4, 129.0, 127.7, 124.9 (q, J = 281.7 Hz), 118.8, 80.8, 49.3 (q, J = 30.8 Hz), 40.9, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −76.0. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3316, 2987, 2932, 1709, 1692, 1531, 1370, 1355, 1305, 1250, 1182, 1156, 1120, 1023, 995. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C15H17BrF3NO3Na [M + Na]+: 418.0236; found, 418.0244.

Tert-Butyl (1,1,1-Trifluoro-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (12)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1j (34 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 5:1), the title compound 12 was obtained as a pale yellow solid (63 mg, 0.18 mmol, 73%). R f = 0.30 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 6:1 (v/v)); mp 114–116 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.75 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (td, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.06–7.00 (m, 2H), 5.20 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 4.93–4.78 (m, 1H), 3.95 (s, 3H), 3.46–3.41 (m, 1H), 3.29–3.21 (m, 1H), 1.43 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 197.0, 158.7, 154.7, 134.5, 130.9, 126.9, 125.3 (q, J = 281.7 Hz), 121.0, 111.6, 80.4, 55.5, 49.3 (q, J = 30.8 Hz), 42.2, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −76.2. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3309, 2977, 2945, 1691, 1674, 1597, 1532, 1484, 1468, 1358, 1291, 1244, 1173, 1157, 1107, 1055, 996. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C16H20F3NO4Na [M + Na]+: 370.1237; found, 370.1243.

4-(3-((Tert-Butoxycarbonyl)­amino)-4,4,4-trifluorobutanoyl)­benzyl 3-Fluorobicyclo­[1.1.1] pentane-1-carboxylate (13)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1k (62 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 6:1), the title compound 13 was obtained as a pale yellow semisolid (94 mg, 0.21 mmol, 82%). R f = 0.18 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 6:1 (v/v)); mp 35–37 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.96 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 5.29–5.27 (m, 1H), 5.22 (s, 2H), 4.96–4.88 (m, 1H), 3.36–3.28 (m, 2H), 2.42 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 6H), 1.46 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 194.6, 168.6 (d, J = 37.2 Hz), 154.6, 141.5, 136.0, 128.5, 128.0, 125.2 (q, J = 281.8 Hz), 80.7, 76.1, 73.5, 65.8, 55.6 (d, J = 21.6 Hz), 49.1 (q, J = 31.7 Hz), 36.9, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −149.8, −75.8. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3351, 2981, 2931, 1697, 1605, 1520, 1413, 1369, 1323, 1249, 1150, 1051, 1016, 914. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C22H26F4NO5 [M + H]+: 460.1742; found, 460.1735.

4-(3-((Tert-Butoxycarbonyl)­amino)-4,4,4-trifluorobutanoyl)­benzyl (2S)-2-(4-Isobutylphenyl)­propanoate (14)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1m (81 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 8:1), the title compound 15 was obtained as a pale yellow semisolid (76 mg, 0.14 mmol, 57%). R f = 0.33 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 6:1 (v/v); mp 35–37 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.85 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 5.21–5.10 (m, 3H), 4.97–4.84 (m, 1H), 3.78 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.32–3.27 (m, 2H), 2.46 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.85 (sept, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.52 (d, J = 7.2, 3H), 1.44 (s, 9H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 194.6, 174.3, 154.6, 142.3, 140.8, 137.4, 135.6, 129.4, 128.3, 127.6, 127.3, 125.2 (q, J = 282.2 Hz), 80.7, 65.3, 49.1 (q, J = 34.5 Hz), 45.1, 45.0, 36.8, 30.2, 28.2, 22.4, 18.3.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.7. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3366, 2957, 2928, 2870, 1735, 1704, 1687, 1524, 1456, 1417, 1367, 1302, 1247, 1152, 1051, 1020, 991. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C29H36F3NO5Na [M + Na]+: 558.2438; found, 558.2448.

Tert-Butyl (1,1,1-Trifluoro-4-oxo-4-(4-((((3aR,5R,5aS,8aS,8bR)-2,2,7,7-tetramethyl tetrahydro-5H-bis­([1,3]­dioxolo)­[4,5-b:4′,5′-d]­pyran-5-yl)­methoxy)­methyl)­phenyl)­butan-2-yl)­carbamate (15)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1l (94 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (194 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 14 was obtained as a pale yellow solid (111 mg, 0.19 mmol, 76%). R f = 0.10 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 6:1 (v/v)); mp > 230 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.92 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 5.57 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 4.97–4.88 (m, 1H), 4.72 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 2H), 4.35 (dd, J = 5.0, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.06 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.76–3.66 (m, 2H), 3.40–3.29 (m, 2H), 1.57 (s, 3H), 1.46 (bs, 12H), 1.36 (bs, 6H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 194.8, 154.7, 146.9, 135.3, 128.6, 127.5, 125.2 (q, J = 281.8 Hz), 109.3, 108.6, 96.3, 80.7, 72.5, 71.2, 70.7, 70.6, 69.5, 67.0, 49.1 (q, J = 31.3 Hz), 36.8, 34.1, 29.7, 28.2, 26.1, 26.0, 24.9, 24.5, 22.3, 14.1.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −75.7. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3330, 2986, 2932, 1697, 1369, 1284, 1255, 1211, 1098, 1017. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C28H38F3NO9Na [M + Na]+: 612.2391; found, 612.2390.

Tert-Butyl (1,1,1,2,2-Pentafluoro-5-(2-methoxyphenyl)-5-oxopentan-3-yl)­carbamate (16)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1j (33 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2b (218 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 16 was obtained as a white solid (64 mg, 0.16 mmol, 65%). R f = 0.18 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 93–95 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.73 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.02–6.98 (m, 2H), 5.12–4.84 (m, 2H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.59–3.35 (m, 1H), 3.22 (dd, J = 16.3, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 1.38 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 197.2, 158.8, 154.5, 134.7, 134.6, 131.1, 131.0, 126.9, 121.1, 120.3–117.8 (m), 80.6, 55.6 (q, J = 34.7 Hz), 42.1, 28.3 (q, J = 20.4 Hz, 3C). 19F­{1H} NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −82.3 (3F), −120.0 (d, J = 273.3 Hz, 1F), −126.1 (d, J = 273.2 Hz, 1F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3315, 2979, 2928, 1695, 1670, 1540, 1485, 1368, 1287, 1216, 1158, 1083, 1054, 1011. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C17H20F5NO4Na [M + Na]+: 420.1210; found, 420.1215.

Tert-Butyl (5-(4-(Tert-butyl)­phenyl)-1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoro-5-oxopentan-3-yl)­carbamate (17)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1a (40 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2b (218 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 17 was obtained as a white solid (74 mg, 0.18 mmol, 70%). R f = 0.25 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 110–112 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.88 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.25 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1H), 5.10–5.04 (m, 1H), 3.40–3.29 (m, 2H), 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.34 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 194.9, 157.7, 154.3, 133.6, 128.1, 125.8, 120.1–117.7 (m), 80.7, 47.7–46.6 (m), 36.3, 35.2, 31.0, 28.1.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −82.3 (3F), −118.8 (d, J = 273.3 Hz, 1F), −125.7 (d, J = 273.3 Hz, 1F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3327, 2964, 2928, 2872, 1692, 1538, 1368, 1286, 1256, 1214, 1169, 1127, 1108, 1082, 1023, 1010, 973. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C20H26F5NO3Na [M + Na]+: 446.1725; found, 446.1734.

Tert-Butyl (1,1,1,2,2-Pentafluoro-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-oxopentan-3-yl)­carbamate (18)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1c (33 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2b (218 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 10:1), the title compound 18 was obtained as a white solid (45 mg, 0.11 mmol, 45%). R f = 0.18 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 10:1 (v/v)); mp 115–117 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.92 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.40–4.88 (m, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.32 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.9, 164.2, 154.5, 130.6, 129.4, 121.1–116.2 (m), 114.2, 80.8, 55.7, 50.0–44.4 (m), 36.2, 28.3.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −82.3 (3F), −118.8 (d, J = 273.2 Hz, 1F), −125.7 (d, J = 273.0 Hz, 1F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR),ν̃ = 3325, 3006, 2972, 2930, 2847, 1694, 1678, 1603, 1535, 1285, 1259, 1245, 1208, 1191, 1164, 1129, 1053, 1018, 1004. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C17H20F5NO4Na [M + Na]+: 420.1210; found, 420.1215.

Tert-Butyl (1,1,1,2,2-Pentafluoro-5-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-oxopentan-3-yl)­carbamate (19)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1e (30 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2b (218 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1), the title compound 19 was obtained as a white solid (69 mg, 0.18 mmol, 72%). R f = 0.20 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 9:1 (v/v)); mp 132–134 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 8.17–7.74 (m, 2H), 7.16 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.24–4.94 (m, 2H), 3.35 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.7, 166.3 (d, J = 256.2 Hz), 154.4, 132.8 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 128.6 (d, J = 9.5 Hz), 121.2–117.2 (m), 116.2 (d, J = 22.0 Hz), 81.0, 48.1–46.6 (m), 36.6, 28.3.19F­{1H} NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −82.2 (3F), −103.8, −118.7 (d, J = 273.5 Hz, 1F), −125.9 (d, J = 273.5 Hz, 1F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3313, 2975, 2923, 1687, 1598, 1540, 1369, 1283, 1239, 1214, 1188, 1171, 1154, 1053, 1027, 1011. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C16H17F6NO3Na [M + Na]+: 408.1005; found, 408.1015.

4-(3-((Tert-Butoxycarbonyl)­amino)-4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentanoyl)­benzyl 3-fluorobicyclo [1.1.1]­pentane-1-carboxylate (20)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1k (61 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2b (218 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 7:3), the title compound 20 was obtained as a white solid (51 mg, 0.10 mmol, 38%). R f = 0.67 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 7:3 (v/v)); mp 86–88 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.94 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.65–4.82 (m, 4H), 3.37 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 6H), 1.42 (s, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 194.8, 168.7 (d, J = 37.2 Hz), 154.6, 141.6, 136.1, 128.6, 128.2, 122.7–111.7 (m), 80.9, 74.9 (d, J = 316.3 Hz), 65.9, 55.7 (d, J = 22.0 Hz), 47.9–46.3 (m), 36.8, 28.3.19F­{1H} NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −82.2 (3F), −118.7 (d, J = 273.3 Hz, 1F), −125.9 (d, J = 273.7 Hz, 1F), −149.7 (1F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3315, 2981, 2929, 1735, 1694, 1537, 1523, 1370, 1334, 1286, 1248, 1213, 1168, 1044, 1012. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C23H25F6NO5Na [M + Na]+: 532.1535; found, 532.1536.

Tert-Butyl (1,1-Difluoro-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (21)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1j (33.5 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2c (184 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1), the title compound 21 was obtained as a colorless oil (50.2 mg, 0.15 mmol, 61% yield). The product was obtained as a mixture of rotamers. R f = 0.43 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc 4:1 (v/v)). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 7.88 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.9 Hz, 0.47 × 1, 1H), 7.81 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.9 Hz, 0.53 × 1, 1H), 7.54–7.46 (m, 1H), 7.07–7.01 (m, 1H), 6.98 (dd, J = 11.2, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (tt, J = 56.2, 4.3 Hz, 0.60 × 1, 1H), 5.92 (tt, J = 56.2, 4.2 Hz, 0.40 × 1, 1H), 4.70 (s, 0.90 × 1, 2H), 4.61 (s, 1.10 × 1, 2H), 3.93 (s, 1.60 × 1, 3H), 3.92 (s, 1.40 × 1, 3H), 3.69–3.53 (m, 2H), 1.49 (s, 4.27 × 1, 9H), 1.37 (s, 4.64 × 1, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 196.1, 195.8, 159.6, 159.2, 156.0, 155.4, 134.7, 134.5, 131.1, 130.8, 125.7, 125.4, 121.1, 121.0, 115.1 (t, J = 242.5 Hz), 115.0 (t, J = 241.9 Hz), 111.7, 111.6, 81.1, 80.9, 59.8, 59.3, 55.7, 55.6, 51.2 (t, J = 27.3 Hz), 51.1 (t, J = 27.2 Hz), 28.4, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): −121.07 (0.90 × 2, 2F), −121.17 (1.10 × 2, 2F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3343, 2976, 2929, 1697, 1599, 1455, 1286, 1203, 1051, 757. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd. for C16H21F2NO4Na 352.1331; found, 352.1331.

Tert-Butyl (4-(4-(Tert-Butyl)­phenyl)-1,1-difluoro-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (22)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1a (40.1 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 2c (184 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1), the title compound 22 was obtained as a colorless oil (49.8 mg, 0.14 mmol, 56% yield). The product was obtained as a mixture of rotamers. R f = 0.5, (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc 4:1 (v/v)). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 7.86 (dd, J = 10.1, 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (dd, J = 12.5, 8.3 Hz, 2H), 5.98 (tt, J = 56.1, 4.3 Hz, 0.50 × 1, 1H), 5.92 (tt, J = 56.2, 4.2 Hz, 0.50 × 1, 1H), 4.76 (s, 1H), 4.67 (s, 1H), 3.64 (qd, J = 14.4, 4.4 Hz, 2H), 1.50 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H), 1.37 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H), 1.35 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H), 1.33 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 194.2, 193.9, 157.7, 155.8, 155.3, 132.6 128.0, 127.8, 126.0, 125.8, 115.0 (t, J = 242.0 Hz), 115.0 (t, J = 242.7 Hz), 81.5, 81.2, 55.2, 54.4, 51.0 (t, J = 27.1 Hz), 50.9 (t, J = 27.1 Hz), 35.3, 35.3, 31.2, 28.4, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): −121.07 (s, 1.00 × 2, 2H), −121.13 (s, 1.00 × 2, 2H). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 2966, 1695, 1605, 1454, 1394, 1367, 1234, 1165, 1119, 1054, 991, 894, 855, 775. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd. for C19H27F2NO3Na 378.1851; found, 378.1855.

Tert-Butyl (4-(4-Fluorophenyl)-1,1-difluoro-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (23)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1e (30.5 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 2c (184 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 9:1), the title compound 23 was obtained as a colorless oil (46.8 mg, 0.15 mmol, 59% yield). The product was obtained as a mixture of rotamers. R f = 0.65, (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc 4:1 (v/v)). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 7.96 (td, J = 9.1, 5.5 Hz, 2H), 7.16 (dt, J = 13.5, 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.97 (tt, J = 56.0, 4.3 Hz, 0.50 × 1, 1H), 5.92 (tt, J = 56.0, 4.2 Hz, 0.50 × 1, 1H), 4.74 (s, 1H), 4.65 (s, 1H), 3.72–3.56 (m, 2H), 1.50 (s, 4.60 × 1, 9H), 1.36 (s, 4.40 × 1, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 193.0, 192.8, 166.2 (d, J = 255.7 Hz), 155.6, 155.3, 131.6, 131.5, 130.6 (dd, J = 28.3, 9.4 Hz), 116.2 (dd, J = 21.9, 15.8 Hz), 114.9 (t, J = 242.3 Hz), 81.7, 81.4, 55.1, 54.4, 51.0 (t, J = 27.1 Hz), 50.8 (t, J = 26.9 Hz), 28.4, 28.2.19F­{1H} NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): −103.78 (s, 0.50 × 1, 1H), −103.83 (s, 0.50 × 1, 1H), −121.11 (s, 1.00 × 2, 2H), −121–16 (s, 1.00 × 2, 2H). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 2979, 2934, 1694, 1599, 1509, 1454, 1395, 1368, 1226, 1157, 1119, 1053, 991,894, 836. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd. for C15H18F3NO3Na 340.1131; found, 340.1140.

Tert-Butyl (1,1-Difluoro-4-oxo-4-(4-((((3aR,5R,5aS,8aS,8bR)-2,2,7,7-tetramethyltetrahydro-5H-bis­([1,3]­dioxolo)­[4,5-b:4′,5′-d]­pyran-5-yl)­methoxy)­methyl)­phenyl)­butan-2-yl)­carbamate (24)

Compound 24 was prepared according to the general procedure from 2-vinylnaphthalene 1l (94.1 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 2c (184 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 9:1), the title compound 24 was obtained as a colorless oil (81.2 mg, 0.14 mmol, 57% yield). R f = 0.5, (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc 4:1­(v/v)). The product was obtained as a mixture of rotamers. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 7.89 (dd, J = 12.0, 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (dd, J = 15.4, 7.9 Hz, 2H), 5.98 (tt, J = 56.0, 4.3 Hz, 0.60 × 1, 1H), 5.92 (tt, J = 56.0, 4.1 Hz, 0.40 × 1, 1H), 5.55 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (s, 1H), 4.71–4.59 (m, 4H), 4.33 (dt, J = 5.4, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (ddd, J = 8.1, 3.3, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 4.07–4.00 (m, 1H), 3.75–3.60 (m, 4H), 1.55 (s, 3.60 × 1, 6H), 1.50 (s, 4.80 × 1, 12H), 1.44 (s, 3.60 × 1, 6H), 1.36 (s, 3.60 × 1, 9H), 1.34 (s, 5.40 × 1, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): 194.2, 194.0, 168.7, 155.7, 155.3, 144.8, 144.8, 134.3, 134.2, 130.7, 128.1, 127.9, 127.7, 127.6, 125.7 (q, J = 3.4 Hz), 116.9, 115.0 (t, J = 242.3 Hz), 109.5, 108.8, 96.5, 81.6, 81.3, 72.7, 71.4, 70.8, 70.7, 69.6, 69.6, 67.2, 55.3, 54.5, 51.0 (t, J = 27.2 Hz), 50.9 (t, J = 26.8 Hz), 28.4, 28.2, 26.2, 26.1, 25.1, 24.6.19F­{1H} NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm): −121.09 (1.00 × 2, 2F), −121.16 (1.20 × 2, 2F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3350, 2982, 2933, 1693, 1514, 1370, 1253, 1165, 1062, 1002, 860, 701. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd. for C28H39F2NO9Na 594.2485; found, 594.2496.

Tert-Butyl (4-(4-(Tert-butyl)­phenyl)-1-fluoro-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (25)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1a (40 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2d (175 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1), the title compound 25 was obtained as a pale yellow oil (52 mg, 0.16 mmol, 62%). R f = 0.30 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 9:1 (v/v)). The product was obtained as a mixture of rotamers. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.94–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.44 (m, 2H), 4.77 (s, 1H), 4.72–4.60 (m, 2H), 4.50 (dt, J = 13.6, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.71–3.53 (m, 2H), 1.49 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H), 1.37 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H), 1.36–1.32 (m, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 194.7, 194.4, 157.4, 155.7, 132.8, 132.7, 128.2, 128.0, 127.8, 125.9, 125.8, 125.7, 84.0 (J = 166.4 Hz), 83.3 (J = 167.9 Hz), 80.7, 80.6, 55.3, 54.5, 49.0 (d, J = 19.4 Hz), 48.9 (d, J = 20.7 Hz), 35.3, 31.2, 28.5, 28.3.19F­{1H} NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −221.5, −222.1. FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 2961, 2917, 2849, 1701, 1605, 1460, 1393, 1365, 1232, 1167, 1108, 1025, 989. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C19H28FNO3Na [M + Na]+: 360.1945; found, 360.1955.

Tert-Butyl (1-Fluoro-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (26)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1e (31 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2d (175 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1), the title compound 26 was obtained as a pale yellow oil (36.7 mg, 0.13 mmol, 49%). R f = 0.42 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 4:1 (v/v)). The product was obtained as a mixture of rotamers. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 8.01–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.19–7.13 (m, 2H), 4.76 (s, 1H), 4.70–4.49 (m, 3H), 3.63 (tt, J = 26.6, 4.8 Hz, 2H), 1.49 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H), 1.37 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.5, 193.3, 166.1 (d, J = 255.7 Hz), 166.1 (d, J = 255.0 Hz), 155.6, 155.5, 130.7 (d, J = 9.4 Hz), 130.5 (d, J = 9.4 Hz), 116.2 (d, J = 22.2 Hz), 116.1 (d, J = 21.7 Hz), 84.1 (J = 166.6 Hz), 83.4 (J = 167.6 Hz), 80.9, 80.7, 55.3, 55.2, 54.5, 54.5, 49.1, 48.9, 28.5, 28.3.19F­{1H} NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −104.2 (0.50 × 1, 1F), −104.2 (0.50 × 1, 1F), −221.5 (0.50 × 1, 1F), −222.1 (0.50 × 1, 1F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3376, 2984, 2932, 1700, 1603, 1512, 1466, 1300, 1231, 1156, 1042, 899, 745. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C15H19F2NO3Na [M + Na]+: 322.1225; found, 322.1228.

Tert-Butyl (1-Fluoro-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxobutan-2-yl)­carbamate (27)

Prepared according to the General Procedure from the corresponding styrene 1c (34 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2d (175 mg, 0.5 mmol, 2.0 equiv). After purification by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1), the title compound 27 was obtained as a pale yellow oil (21.8 mg, 0.07 mmol, 28%). R f = 0.28 (silica gel, n-hexane/EtOAc, 4:1 (v/v)). The product was obtained as a mixture of rotamers. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.98–7.84 (m, 2H), 6.94 (t, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H), 4.75 (s, 1H), 4.69–4.47 (m, 3H), 3.91–3.84 (m, 3H), 3.70–3.54 (m, 2H), 1.49 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H), 1.36 (s, 4.50 × 1, 9H). 13C­{1H} NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 193.5, 193.3, 163.9, 155.7, 130.6, 130.3, 130.3, 130.1, 128.4, 114.2, 114.1, 114.0, 84.0 (J = 166.9 Hz), 83.3 (J = 167.7 Hz), 80.7, 80.5, 55.7, 55.6, 55.0, 54.3, 49.0 (d, J = 19.9 Hz), 49.0 (J = 20.3 Hz), 28.5, 28.3.19F­{1H} NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −221.6 (0.50 × 1, 1F), −222.2 (0.50 × 1, 1F). FT-IR (cm–1, neat, ATR), ν̃ = 3366, 2974, 2929, 2849, 1686, 1600, 1512, 1456, 1366, 1231, 1166, 1066, 814. HRMS (ESI+) calcd for C16H22FNO4Na [M + Na]+: 334.1425; found, 334.1425.

Supplementary Material

jo4c03142_si_001.pdf (3.8MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Support for this work under grants PID2021-124916NB-I00, PID2021-128496OB-I00 and RED2022-134287-T funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (Spain) and 2021SGR00064 from AGAUR Generalitat de Catalunya are gratefully acknowledged.

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.4c03142.

  • Preparation of starting materials, general procedures, derivatization reactions, mechanistic studies and NMR spectra (PDF)

‡.

A.G and P.S contributed equally. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

†.

Dedicated to Prof. Iluminada Gallardo (UAB) on the occasion of her retirement.

References

  1. a Tian F., Yan G., Yu J.. Recent advances in the synthesis and applications of α-(trifluoromethyl)­styrenes in organic synthesis. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:13486–13505. doi: 10.1039/C9CC06465F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Liu X., Xu C., Wang M., Liu Q.. Trifluoromethyltrimethylsilane: Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylation and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:683–730. doi: 10.1021/cr400473a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Charpentier J., Früh N., Togni A.. Electrophilic Trifluoromethylation by Use of Hypervalent Iodine Reagents. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:650–682. doi: 10.1021/cr500223h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Granados A., Vallribera A.. Asymmetric Preparation of α-Quaternary Fluorinated β-keto Esters. Review. Molecules. 2020;25:3264. doi: 10.3390/molecules25143264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Liang T., Neumann C. N., Ritter T.. Introduction of Fluorine and Fluorine-Containing Functional Groups. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013;52:8214–8264. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. a Meanwell N. A.. Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in the Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 2018;61:5822–5880. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ogawa Y., Tokunaga E., Kobayashi O., Hirai K., Shibata N.. Current Contributions of Organofluorine Compounds to the Agrochemical Industry. iScience. 2020;23:101467. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Dhara M. G., Banerjee S.. Fluorinated high-performance polymers: Poly­(arylene ether)­s and aromatic polyimides containing trifluoromethyl groups. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010;35:1022–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Purser S., Moore P. R., Swallow S., Gouverneur V.. Fluorine in medicinal chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37:320–330. doi: 10.1039/B610213C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Black W. C., Bayly C. I., Davis D. E., Desmarais S., Falgueyret J. P., Léger S., Li C. S., Massé F., McKay D. J., Palmer J. T., Percival M. D., Robichaud J., Tsou N., Zamboni R.. Trifluoroethylamines as amide isosteres in inhibitors of cathepsin K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005;15:4741–4744. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.07.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zanda M.. Trifluoromethyl group: an effective xenobiotic function for peptide backbone modification. New J. Chem. 2004;28:1401–1411. doi: 10.1039/b405955g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou M., Feng Z., Zhang X.. Recent advances in the synthesis of fluorinated amino acids and peptides. Chem. Commun. 2023;59:1434–1448. doi: 10.1039/D2CC06787K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Gomtsyan A.. Direct Synthesis of β-Aminoketones from Amides via Novel Sequential Nucleophilic Substitution/Michael Reaction. Org. Lett. 2000;2:11–13. doi: 10.1021/ol9911122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Huguenot F., Brigaud T.. Convenient Asymmetric Synthesis of β-Trifluoromethyl-β-amino Acid, β-Amino Ketones, and γ-Amino Alcohols via Reformatsky and Mannich-Type Reactions from 2-Trifluoromethyl-1,3-oxazolidines. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:2159–2162. doi: 10.1021/jo052323p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Mei H., Xiong Y., Han J., Pan Y.. A facile process for the asymmetric synthesis of β-trifluoromethylated β-amino ketones via addition of ketone enolates to sulfinylimine. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:1402–1406. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00586j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Xie C., Mei H., Wu L., Han J., Soloshonok V. A., Pan Y.. Large-scale Mannich-type reactions of (S S)-N-tert-butanesulfinyl-(3,3,3)-trifluoroacetaldimine with C-nucleophiles. J. Fluorine Chem. 2014;165:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2014.06.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo F., Chen J., Huang Y.. A Bifunctional N-Heterocyclic Carbene as a Noncovalent Organocatalyst for Enantioselective Aza-Michael Addition Reactions. ACS Catal. 2021;11:6316–6324. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c01908. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu S., Huang Y., Wang J., Qing F.-L., Xu X.-H.. General Synthesis of N-Trifloromethyl Compounds with N-Trifluoromethyl Hydroxylamine Reagents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:1962–1970. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. a Liu Y., Zhou T., Xuan L., Lin Y., Li F., Wang H., Lyu J., Yan Q., Zhou H., Wang W., Chen F.-E.. Visible-Light-Driven C,N-Selective Heteroarylation of N-Fluoroalkyl Hydroxylamine Reagents with Quinoxalin-2­(1H)-ones. Org. Lett. 2023;25:8693–8699. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c03594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Wang J., Liu S., Huang Y., Xu X.-H., Qing F.-L.. Photoredox catalyzed C–H trifluoroethylamination of heteroarenes. Chem. Commun. 2022;58:1346–1349. doi: 10.1039/D1CC06688A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen B., Chen Q., Liu Y., Chen J., Zhou X., Wang H., Yan Q., Wang W., Cai Z., Chen F.-E.. Visible-Light-Induced Defluorinative α-C­(sp3)–H Alkylation for the Synthesis of gem-Difluoroallylated α-Trifluoromethylamines. Org. Lett. 2023;25:9124–9129. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c03523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang N., Du Y., Mei H., Escorihuela J., Han J.. A Cu-promoted reaction of β-keto trifluoromethyl amines enabling stereoselective synthesis of trifluoromethylated aziridines. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023;21:4988–4992. doi: 10.1039/d3ob00714f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mei H., Wang N., Li Z., Han J.. Intramolecular Appel Reaction of Trifluoromethylated β-Keto Diazos Enabling Assembly of Trifluoromethylpyrazoles. Org. Lett. 2022;24:2258–2263. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c00738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pertusati F., Ferla S., Basseto M., Brancale A., Khandil S., Westwell A. D., McGuigan C.. A new series of bicalutamide, enzalutamide and enobosarm derivatives carrying pentafluorosulfanyl (SF5) and pentafluoroethyl (C2F5) substituents: Improved antiproliferative agents against prostate cancer. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019;180:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zafrani Y., Sod-Moriah G., Yeffet D., Berliner A., Amir D., Marciano D., Elias S., Katalan S., Ashkenazi N., Madmon M., Gershonov E., Saphier S.. CF2H, a Functional Group-Dependent Hydrogen-Bond Donor: Is It a More or Less Lipophilic Bioisostere of OH, SH, and CH3? J. Med. Chem. 2019;62:5628–5637. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Reichel M. Sc. M., Karaghiosoff K.. Reagents for Selective Fluoromethylation: A Challenge in Organofluorine Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:12268–12281. doi: 10.1002/anie.201913175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gallego-Gamo A., Sarró P., Ji Y., Pleixats R., Molins E., Gimbert-Suriñach C., Vallribera A., Granados A.. Direct Synthesis of 2-Hydroxytrifluoroethylacetophenones via Organophotoredox-Mediated Net-Neutral Radical/Polar Crossover. J. Org. Chem. 2024;89:11682–11692. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.4c01419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wiles R. J., Molander G. A.. Photoredox-Mediated Net-Neutral Radical/Polar Crossover Reactions. Isr. J. Chem. 2020;60:281–293. doi: 10.1002/ijch.201900166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tomita R., Yasu T., Koike T., Akita M.. Combining Photoredox-Catalyzed Trifluoromethylation and Oxidation with DMSO: Facile Synthesis of α-Trifluoromethylated Ketones from Aromatic Alkenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:7144–7148. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jo4c03142_si_001.pdf (3.8MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.


Articles from The Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES