Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2025 May 12:rs.3.rs-6572358. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6572358/v1

Small intestinal microbial fiber metabolism dysfunction in celiac disease

M Wulczynski 1, M Constante 1, HJ Galipeau 1, J-J Blom 1, GH Rueda 1, N El-Chaar 1, DK Superdock 2, S Jiang 2, LA David 2, JA Murray 3, MG Surette 1, D Armstrong 1, MI Pinto Sanchez 1, P Bercik 1, A Caminero 1,*, EF Verdu 1,*
PMCID: PMC12136232  PMID: 40470242

Abstract

Celiac disease (CeD) is an immune-mediated condition driven by dietary gluten resulting in small intestinal mucosal inflammation and injury, along with myriads of symptoms. The only treatment is a lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD) and although most patients improve, the restriction can lead to nutrient deficiencies including fiber. While duodenal microbiota is altered in CeD, its fiber metabolic capacity is unknown. Here we show that both active and treated CeD patients had impaired microbial fiber metabolism in the small intestine which associates with depletion of the carbolytic taxa Prevotella spp. Colonization of germ-free mice with Prevotella spp increased small intestinal short chain fatty acids (SCFA). In gluten-sensitized mice expressing the celiac risk gene, HLA-DQ8, an inulin-supplemented diet facilitated microbial carbolytic function, SCFAs production and accelerated mucosal healing in the small intestine during GFD. The results support clinical investigations of dietary fiber supplementation and microbial carbolytic function to enhance responses to GFD in CeD.

Introduction:

Celiac disease (CeD) is an immune-mediated disorder driven by related prolamin proteins termed “gluten” in wheat, rye, and barley1. The disease affects the proximal small intestine, leading to intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltration, villus blunting, and crypt hyperplasia. CeD has autoimmune traits, including HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8 association, anti-tissue transglutaminase 2 (TG2) autoantibodies, and immune-mediated intestinal epithelial cell destruction1,2. While about 30% of the global population is genetically predisposed, only 2–3% of those at risk develop the condition3,4. This, tied to the rapid growth in prevalence and incidence in the past decades, suggests that there are environmental determinants in addition to gluten5,6.

Longitudinal studies in genetically at-risk populations suggest that gastrointestinal infections at early life, especially when combined with high gluten intake, are associated with higher risk to develop CeD68. Cross sectional studies have demonstrated differences in microbiota composition and function in the small intestine of active CeD911. Indeed, diet is a major driver of microbiota establishment and function, and recent studies have suggested that higher consumption of fiber-rich foods such as vegetables is associated with lower odds of developing celiac autoimmunity5,12. A recent reanalysis of the large longitudinal cohort study, The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY), suggests an association between increased fiber intake in early life (<3 years) and reduced risk of CeD13. In the colon, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs; such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate), produced by microbial fiber metabolism, have been linked to gastrointestinal health through improved motility, anti-inflammatory activity, and microbiome modulation, primarily mediated through G-protein coupled receptors, GPR41 and GPR43, which are widely expressed on immune and epithelial cells14,15. However, the role of microbial fiber metabolism and SCFA production in the small intestine in the context of CeD, remains understudied.

The only current treatment for CeD is the lifelong elimination of gluten. While a gluten-free diet (GFD) is effective in most patients, mucosal healing is slow and often impeded by rapid reactivation of memory cells, likely related to accidental gluten exposure. Although the GFD is usually low in fiber16, especially when composed of processed gluten-free products, little is known about the fiber metabolic capacity of CeD microbiota along the gastrointestinal tract. Indeed, increased fiber intake is often recommended to CeD patients on GFD to manage constipation, without mechanistic insight on microbial carbolytic capacity or its impact on inflammation.

Our study reveals that patients with active and treated CeD had impaired microbial fiber metabolism in the small intestine independently of differences in fiber intake. Carbolytic taxa depleted in CeD include Prevotella spp, known fiber degraders17. Colonization of germ-free mice with Prevotella spp increased SCFA in the small intestine. In gluten-sensitized NOD/DQ8 mice, the soluble fiber inulin accelerated mucosal healing by supporting carbolytic activity of the small intestinal microbiota. Our results support intervention with dietary fibers, such as inulin, in CeD patients alongside the GFD, to improve mucosal healing so long as patients harbor the necessary microbial function.

Results

Patient demographics.

A total of 16 CeD patients diagnosed within the previous 3 months (newly diagnosed CeD), 11 CeD patients on a >2 years GFD (T-CeD) and 26 healthy controls were recruited for the study. Details on participant demographics, clinical characteristics and samples collected are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1:

Patient demographic summary and number of samples collected for analysis.

Questionnaires and Samples available
Diagnosis Mean age Number / Sex FFQ GSRS (n); mean score Fecal FoodSeq Fecal SCFA Duodenal aspirate 16S
Healthy controls CeD 37.5 26 (14 F: 12 M) n = 5 (n = 23); 20 n =23 n = 18 n = 17
38.8 16 (12 F: 4 M) n = 6 (n = 9); 45 n = 15 n = 11 n = 7
Treated CeD 43 11 (8 F:3 M) n = 7 (n = 8); 37 n = 11 n = 8 n = 7

Average age, sex distribution, and number of samples available for each group. Individual demographic information is further detailed in Supplementary Table 1.

CeD= celiac disease, FFQ= food frequency questionnaire; GSRS= Gastrointestinal Rating Symptoms Scale; Fecal FoodSeq=fecal plant DNA; Fecal SCFA= fecal short chain fatty acids.

Microbial carbolytic function in the small intestine was lower in CeD.

Microbiota composition of duodenal aspirates was assessed using 16S RNA sequencing. Duodenal α-diversity was lower in CeD than in controls or T-CeD (Fig. 1a), and β-diversity confirmed distinct profiles between the three groups (Fig. 1b). PICRUSt2 analysis revealed no differences in total glycosidase hydrolase genes (EC 3.2.1) between CeD, T-CeD and controls (Fig 1c), however, microbial genes encoding α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1; K07405) and fructan β-fructosidase (EC 3.2.1.80; K03332), a fiber degrading enzyme18, were lower in CeD and T-CeD versus controls (Fig. 1d). The metagenomic contributions to these genes from top genera are visualized in Fig. 1e. The top 4 predicted contributors belonged to Prevotellaceae family which were less abundant in CeD and T-CeD versus controls (Supplementary Fig 1). Overall, microbial alterations associated with CeD were characterized by lower predicted microbial carbolytic function, independently of treatment with GFD.

Figure 1: Predicted decreases in duodenal microbial carbolytic enzymes in celiac disease versus healthy controls.

Figure 1:

a Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity α-diversity of duodenal aspirate microbiota. b Aitchinson distance β-diversity plot of microbial profiles from duodenal aspirates from controls. Samples were distinctly separated by group using PERMANOVA (p<0.01). c Cumulative abundance of microbial glycoside hydrolase genes in the total PICRUSt2 predicted metagenome from duodenal aspirates. d Relative abundance of α-amylase (K07405) and fructan β-fructosidase (K07405) gene copies from duodenal aspirates. e PICRUSt2 predicted metagenomic contribution of top bacterial genera to genes of interest. Data for a, c, d were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. For all data, healthy controls (Ctrl; blue, n= 17), celiac disease (CeD; red, n= 7), and treated celiac disease (T-CeD;green, n= 7), and sex was represented by females (squares) and males (circles).

Diet does not fully explain lower microbial carbolytic function in CeD.

Diet was investigated to determine whether altered microbial predicted function was associated with fiber consumption. In the majority of participants, the fiber intake was below the minimum recommendation for fiber set by Health Canada (25 g/day), based on food frequency questionnaire (FFQ19), with up to 86% of T-CeD being fiber-deficient (Fig. 2a). Although a similar trend was observed for total fiber, there were no statistical differences between the calculated soluble and insoluble fiber fractions between groups (Fig 2b). To compare dietary patterns at time of sample collection, fecal plant DNA was analyzed using FoodSeq20, which showed lower observed plant richness (total plant species) in T-CeD group compared with controls (Fig 2c), although Shannon diversity was similar (Fig 2d). The post-hoc analysis of overall dietary plant composition revealed a significant difference between T-CeD and controls (Fig. 2e), characterized by patterns such as opposing loadings of Oryza sativa (rice) and Poaceae (rye, wheat family), consistent with the elimination of gluten-containing foods. Overall, food sequencing patterns demonstrated GFDs were highly individualized (Supplementary Fig. 2). Patient reported gastrointestinal symptom scores (GSRS; total score and individual sub-scores) did not correlate with fiber intake, suggesting no obvious relationship with symptoms. Thus, while T-CeD participants had a shift in plant DNA signatures, overall fiber intake was not significantly different versus CeD or controls.

Figure 2: Patients with CeD have lower fecal SCFA than T-CeD and healthy controls.

Figure 2:

a Estimated total daily fiber consumption in controls (blue, n= 5), active CeD (red, n= 6), and T-CeD (green, n= 7). Dashed line represents the daily recommendation from Health Canada. b Calculated soluble and insoluble fractions of estimated total fiber in healthy controls (blue, n= 5), active CeD (red, n= 6), and T-CeD (green, n= 7). c Number of distinct plant taxa in healthy controls (blue, n= 23), CeD (red, n= 15), and T-CeD (green, n= 11); Control vs T-CeD: β = −5.98±2.78, p < 0.05. d Shannon α-diversity of plant taxa in healthy controls (blue, n= 23), CeD (red, n= 15), and T-CeD (green, n= 11). e Principal component analysis of dietary plant composition in healthy controls (blue, n= 23), CeD (red, n= 15), and T-CeD (green, n= 11). Vectors identify top 9 taxa driving variation with red emphasis on Oryza sativa and Poaceae. Overall dietary plant composition was influenced by patient group (PERMANOVA; df = 2, F = 2.04, R2 = 0.080, p = 0.001), and specifically between control vs T-CeD: PERMANOVA; df = 1, F = 3.94, R2 = 0.110, adjusted p < 0.05. f Fecal SCFA in healthy controls (blue, n= 18), CeD (red, n= 11), and T-CeD (green, n= 8). For all data multiple groups were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test, and sex was represented by females (squares) and males (circles).

To assess microbial metabolism of fiber in our cohorts, fecal SCFA were measured as a marker of fiber fermentation using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS). CeD patients had lower total SCFA compared with controls (Fig. 2f). Specifically, acetic acid levels were lower in CeD than in controls or T-CeD, and butyric acid levels were lower in CeD and T-CeD groups as compared to controls. While T-CeD had the lowest fiber intake of the 3 groups, these patients had modestly higher SCFA levels than CeD. The results suggest T-CeD partially recovers microbial carbolytic capacity, despite the sub-optimal amount of fiber ingested by these patients, which may be related to histological amelioration.

Inulin accelerates recovery of gluten-immunopathology in NOD/DQ8 mice on GFD.

Mice with transgenic expression HLA-DQ8 gene in non-obese diabetic background (NOD/DQ8) were sensitized with gluten as previously described21 to determine timing of mucosal recovery from gluten-immunopathology after 2, 6, 10, and 24 weeks of GFD (Supplementary Fig. 3a). CD3+ IELs, villus to crypt (V/C) ratios and composite VCIEL score normalized by week 10 of GFD in previously sensitized mice (Supplementary Fig. 3). However, small intestinal antibodies against gliadin or TG2 remained elevated in some mice (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Once determined that sensitized NOD/DQ8 mice normalized histological parameters at week10 of GFD, the effect of fiber supplementation was investigated. Additional sensitized NOD/DQ8 mice (Fig 3a) were given GFD with no added fiber or supplemented with either inulin (52g/kg) or HylonVII (136g/kg) supplemented diets for 6 weeks (described in Table 2). Compared with non-sensitized controls (naïve), sensitized mice had higher CD3+ IELs (Fig 3b), and lower V/C ratio (Fig 3c) and composite VCIEL score (Fig 3d). Supplementation with inulin during GFD improved all histological parameters versus the no added fiber group. HylonVII did not normalize IELs, but mice had higher V/C ratios versus no added fiber group. Neither of the fiber diets normalized antibodies in intestinal content at 6 weeks follow-up. However, all mice became seronegative after 12 weeks of inulin or HylonVII (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Figure 3: Inulin accelerates histological recovery in gluten-sensitized SPF NOD/DQ8 mice.

Figure 3:

a Schematic protocol for gluten sensitization, wheat diet, and different fibers supplemented during recovery on GFD. Naïve (non-sensitized controls, no added fiber GFD, white n= 9), no added fiber (grey n= 6), inulin (blue n = 6) and HylonVII (yellow n= 6). b CD3+ intraepithelial lymphocytes numbers after six weeks of recovery by diet (n= 6 / experimental group). c Villus-to-crypt ratio after six weeks of recovery by diet (n= 6 / experimental group). d, Composite VCIEL scores after six weeks of recovery by diet (n= 6 / experimental group). Dashed line represents the baseline determined from naïve controls. e Representative histological images of jejunal tissue after six weeks of recovery by diet. For all data, multiple groups were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.

Table 2:

Composition of mouse diets.

Diets and Nutrient Information TD.05620 TD.200056 TD.210884 TD.210885
GFD Wheat diet Inulin HylonVII
Protein 20.9 20.9 21.9 20.1
% kcal from Carbohydrate 65.9 65.9 64.3 67.8
Fat 13.2 13.2 13.8 12.1
Kcal/g 3.2 3.2 3 3.1
Dietary Fiber 5–10% 5–7% 15.80% 15.50%
Ingredients (g / kg)
Corn 500 N/A 500 364
Soybean Meal 270 265 270 270
Soybean Hull 40 40 40 40
DL-Methionine, FG (99%) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Maltodextrin 115.73 115.73 62.93 115.73
Lard 25 25 25 25
Mineral Mix, U.S. Rodent (99115) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Calcium Carbonate, FG (38%) 13 13 13 13
Dicalcium Phosphate, FD, 18.5% P, 21% C) 12 12 12 12
Magnesium Oxide, FD (58%) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
Sodium Chloride, iodized 10 10 10 10
Vitamin Mix, U.S. Rodent (99114) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Vitamin Mix, U.S. Supplement (99116) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Choline Chloride, FG (60%) 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07
Locust Bean Gum w/ gelatin 1 1 1 1
Wheat N/A 375 N/A N/A
Corn Starch N/A 116 N/A N/A
Cellulose N/A 1.8 N/A N/A
Corn Oil N/A 12.2 N/A N/A
Inulin N/A N/A 52.8 N/A
High Amylose Corn Starch N/A N/A N/A 136

Custom diets were based on our mouse gluten-free diet (GFD) formulated by Envigo (Inotiv) to substitute macromolecule sources (e.g. corn vs wheat) or specific nutrients (e.g. inulin or HylonVII)

Inulin increases small intestinal SCFA without major changes in microbial profiles.

Inulin supplementation during GFD, but not HylonVII, was associated with higher SCFA, primarily acetic acid, in the small intestine of SPF NOD/DQ8 mice, compared with no added fiber (Fig. 4a). There were no differences in profiles between inulin and no added fiber groups (Fig. 4b). HylonVII supplemented mice clustered separately with lower relative abundance of Turicibacter and Muribaculum, and higher Escherichia/Shigella (Fig. 4c). SCFA correlated positively with Turicibacter and Muribaculum and negatively with Escherichia/Shigella relative abundances (Fig. 4d). Additional details on microbiota composition are provided in Supplementary Fig. 5.

Figure 4: Inulin increases small intestinal SCFA in gluten-sensitized SPF NOD/DQ8 mice.

Figure 4:

a Small intestinal SCFA after 6 weeks of recovery with no added fiber GFD, inulin (IN), or HylonVII (RS). b Aitchinson distance β-diversity plot of microbial profiles from mice after six weeks of recovery on no added fiber GFD (grey), inulin (blue) and HylonVII (yellow). Samples from HylonVII were distinct from GFD and inulin groups using PERMANOVA (p<0.01). c, Relative abundances of Turicibacter, Muribaculum, and Escherichia/Shigella in the duodenum after 6 weeks of recovery. d Small intestinal SCFA levels positively correlated with abundances Turicibacter and Muribaculum, and negatively correlate with Escherichia/Shigella by Pearson’s correlation. For a, c, multiple groups were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. For all data n= 6 / group.

Inulin and Prevotella boost SCFA production in the small intestine.

To further investigate small intestinal microbial fiber metabolism in vivo we first compared SCFA production in germ-free (GF) versus SPF NOD/DQ8 mice in response to inulin (Fig 5a). Inulin increased total small intestinal SCFA in SPF versus GF mice (Fig. 5b), confirming that fiber metabolism required microbiota presence. This was driven by increases in acetic acid, with no differences in propionic or butyric acids. As expected, the magnitude of SCFA increase was 10-times higher in feces than the small intestine, also evidencing differences in the main SCFA produced between the two sites (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Next, to investigate host responses to local SCFA availability, expression of SCFA receptors, GPR41 and GPR43, was assessed along the intestinal tract. Inulin associated with higher Gpr41 and Gpr43 expression at most small intestinal sites, including the duodenum (Fig. 5c, d). No differences in SCFA receptors were observed in GF mice after inulin supplemented diet.

Figure 5: SPF and gnotobiotic mice colonized with Prevotella spp produce SCFA from inulin in vivo.

Figure 5:

a Schematic protocol for diet intervention non-sensitized germ-free (GF, squares) and specific-pathogen free (SPF, circles) NOD/DQ8 mice were fed either GFD with no added fiber (grey) or supplemented with inulin (blue) for 3 weeks (n= 5 / group). b Small intestinal SCFA after 3 weeks of no added fiber GFD (white) or inulin diet (blue) in GF (squares) and SPF (circles) mice. Multiple groups were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. c Relative change in SCFA receptor Gpr41 measured in tissue samples from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon of GF and SPF mice when supplemented inulin. Data is represented as the fold-change in Gpr41 expression when fed inulin compared to no added fiber diets as control for GF and SPF mice. d Expression of Gpr41 in the jejunum. For each location, a Student’s T Test compared Gpr41 expression in mice fed GFD with no added fiber or with inulin; for GF and/or SPF mice. e Schematic protocol for Prevotella colonization of GF NOD/DQ8 mice (n= 4 / group). Mice were given inulin diet and colonized by oral gavage with either Prevotella cocktail (triangles) or saline (squares; vehicle control) on days 1 and 3. f Small intestinal SCFA of GF (square) and Prevotella spp. colonized mice after three weeks of diet. Data was compared using Student’s T test. AA - Acetic acid; PA - Propionic acid; BA - Butyric acid.

Finally, based on our observation that fiber-degrading bacteria from the Prevotellaceae family were depleted in the duodenum of CeD patients, GF NOD/DQ8 mice were colonized with a cocktail of 10 Prevotellaceae members (Fig. 5e, Table 3). Prevotella-colonized mice, but not GF mice, supplemented with inulin had higher small intestinal SCFA (Fig 5f). The results demonstrate that small intestinal taxa, such as Prevotellaceae, can produce SCFA from dietary fiber in the small intestine when the appropriate substrate in present.

Table 3:

Prevotella isolates and sources

# Gene copies
Bacteria ID# Source α-Amylase Fructan β-fructosidase
Alloprevotella alloprevotella GC2143 Feces 1 1
Prevotella copri GC2072 Feces 1 2
Prevotella denticola GC1774 Nasal 1 1
Prevotella histicola GC335 Nasal 1 2
Prevotella intermedia GC330 Sputum 1 1
Prevotella melanogenica GC149 Sputum 1 2
Prevotella nanceiensis GC155 Sputum 1 1
Prevotella nigrescens GC308 Saliva 1 1
Prevotella oralis GC309 Sputum 1 1
Prevotella salivae GC332 Saliva 1 1

All bacterial strains were obtained from the genome collection (GC) of Dr. Michael Surette (McMaster University). Bacteria were isolated from healthy humans.

Discussion:

Management of chronic gastrointestinal conditions through dietary approaches is common and is related to the ability of some food substrates to modulate gut microbiota composition or function in a beneficial15 or detrimental manner22. Fiber and its metabolites produced in the lower gastrointestinal tract as a result of microbial metabolism, are frequently associated with improved gastrointestinal health14,15, although current dietary guidelines do not always provide evidence-based recommendations for specific diseases. In CeD, inflammation occurs in low bio-mass sites, primarily in the duodenum23. Thus, the impact of fiber metabolism on gluten-driven inflammation has not been investigated, despite a high fiber intake often being recommended to newly diagnosed patients alongside the only current therapy, a strict GFD. Here we report that key fiber-degrading bacteria are depleted in the small intestine of patients with CeD both before and after treatment with a GFD, impairing microbial carbolytic activity. Furthermore, in genetically predisposed mice sensitized with gluten, we identify a fiber-specific effect that increases small intestinal SCFA production and accelerates recovery from gluten immunopathology after GFD.

Given that GFD are often low in fibre, especially when relying on processed gluten-free products, CeD patients are advised to increase fiber intake through diet or supplements, to avoid symptomatic complications such as constipation16,24. Furthermore, results from different large-scale population based prospective studies have identified a potential role for fiber in CeD management beyond constipation. The Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) showed that higher maternal fiber consumption associated with lower risk of CeD in offspring25, which parallels the findings from the TEDDY cohort, where increased fiber during early life reduced risk as well13. While these studies identified interesting epidemiological associations, they did not investigate underlying mechanisms. Using a cohort of healthy controls, newly diagnosed CeD patients and T-CeD >2 years on GFD, we here show that many individuals have lower than recommended fiber intake which tends to further decrease when they adopt a GFD. This fiber deficit is consistent with the Canadian Community Health Survey that reported inadequate median fiber intake in over 35,000 healthy Canadians26. To further investigate differences in food intake between cohorts objectively, fecal plant DNA was assessed. Specific taxa such as Poaceae (wheat, rye family) and Oryza sativa (rice) were identified as opposing pattern drivers between controls and T-CeD. CeD patients had lower total SCFA than healthy controls, despite similar abundance and diversity of plant DNA in feces. T-CeD, had the highest estimated fiber deficiency, and demonstrated only partial increase in SCFA, which aligns with previous studies showing lower SCFA in untreated CeD children versus patients with partial restoration after the GFD.27,28 The reason for this is unclear, but could relate to some recovery of microbial function after improvement of small intestinal inflammation in T-CeD, which supports dietary intervention studies in this population.

Microbial changes in CeD have been described as factors that can contribute to disease initiation, perpetuation, and resolution5. Our results are consistent with previous descriptions that duodenal microbiota profiles differ between active CeD, T-CeD and healthy subjects. Although diagnostic and universal signatures have not been identified due to individual and methodological variability, some taxa are more commonly observed across different studies9. Here we found that members of Prevotellaceae family were less abundant in CeD and T-CeD versus controls with lower predicted microbial carbolytic function, independently of treatment with GFD. Prevotellaceae, a fiber degrading taxa29, has been previously reported to be lower in duodenal biopsies of both children and adults with CeD compared with controls11. Prevotella spp have also been involved in immunomodulation within the gastrointestinal tract and some species have been shown to ameliorate systemic autoimmunity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, models of collagen-induced arthritis and diabetes, with positive effects in phase one trials for autoimmune skin disease30,31.

To further investigate this mechanistically, we used NOD/DQ8 mice which express moderate immunopathology after sensitization with gluten and a bacterial adjuvant21,34. In this model, gluten-immunopathology can be exacerbated or improved, depending on the microbial community mice are colonized with35,36. We showed that an inulin-supplemented diet increased small intestinal SCFA in SPF NOD/DQ8 mice, specifically acetate, without altering microbiota composition, and that this was associated with faster histological resolution, to a greater extent than HylonVII. It is possible that inulin undergoes more rapid partial digestion in the small intestine compared with HylonVII, a type-2 resistant starch made of linear α−1,4 and branching α−1,6 linkages. While Turicibacter and Muribaculum were positively associated with small intestinal SCFA in inulin supplemented mice37, a higher relative abundance of the potentially proinflammatory taxa Escherichia/Shigella38,39 was observed in HylonVII fed mice. The latter could explain the lower degree of histopathology improvement versus inulin. Finally, colonization of germ-free mice with Prevotella spp increased small intestinal short chain fatty acids (SCFA) upon inulin supplementation. A previous seminal study postulated that long-term fiber inadequacy could cause loss of fiber-degrading taxa in the gut, which might not be restored by increased fiber without supplemental microbiota32. Thus, while some gluten-free products are now formulated with a higher fiber content33, overall our results indicate the potential need to optimize both substrate and microbial metabolizers during GFD, likely in a personalized manner.

Our study has some limitations. The FFQ was not specifically designed to assess GFD, and not all participants completed the questionnaire. However, we supplemented the FFQ with an objective dietary sequencing method, FoodSeq, which investigated plant DNA in fecal samples at the time of sample collection. We did not perform direct measurement of small intestinal SCFA from human aspirates because it is technically challenging. Instead, we predicted microbial small intestinal fiber metabolism in the human aspirates using PICRUSt2 and performed mechanistic studies in mice, including with humanized microbiota.

In summary, the duodenum constitutes a unique microbial niche which should be considered distinct from the rest of the intestine when investigating the role of fiber metabolism in the prevention and treatment of diseases that affect primarily the small bowel. Our study provides clinical evidence that the small intestinal microbiota in CeD contains less fiber-degrading bacteria, such as Prevotellaceae independently of diet and preclinical evidence that certain fibers could be used as adjuvant therapy for the GFD to promote mucosal healing, when metabolizing taxa are present.

Methods:

Human participants

Patients attending the McMaster University Celiac Clinic were recruited after signing informed consent. New cases of CeD (consuming gluten) were diagnosed based on positive serological markers, the presence of either HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8, and evaluation of duodenal biopsies (n= 16). Treated CeD (T-CeD) included patients with a verified diagnosis, who were on GFD > 2 years and attending the clinic as part of their follow-up (n= 11). Healthy controls included patients attending the McMaster University Digestive Diseases Clinic with a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease without other symptoms, and/or having confirmed normal endoscopy and biopsy, negative celiac serology, and negative Helicobacter pylori. They also did not fulfill criteria for disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) based on Rome IV criteria40. All participants were asked to complete a validated food frequency questionnaire (Victoria Cancer Council Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies v2)19 to assess their habitual diet, and a validated gastrointestinal symptoms ratings score (GSRS)41 to assess symptoms. No participant had prescribed proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, probiotics, or fiber supplementation at the time of sample collection. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT06532110) and approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB # 15311). For details see Supplementary Table 1.

Human sample collection

Fecal samples were collected and stored in anaerobic packages. After transport to the hospital, the samples were aliquoted in an anaerobic chamber42. Duodenal aspirates were collected during endoscopy, mixed with 10% glycerol and aliquoted in aerobic conditions43. All samples were frozen at −80 °C until analysis.

Mouse model

Breeding pairs of non-obese diabetic AB° DQ8 (NOD/DQ8) mice44 were originally received from Dr. Joseph Murray (Mayo Clinic, USA)45. Female and male specific-pathogen free (SPF) mice were bred and housed in the McMaster Central Animal Facility (CAF) and were 8–10-weeks-old and sex-matched for all experimental groups. SPF mice were housed in clean rooms, with ad libitum water and an irradiated grain-based diet formulated without gluten (GFD, TD.05620, Envigo; Table 2). Germ-free (GF) NOD/DQ8 mice were generated by two stage embryo transfer and housed within the McMaster Axenic Gnotobiotic Unit (AGU) in flexible film isolators with free access to autoclaved food and water35. Diets were autoclaved to ensure sterility. Mice were sacrificed under anaesthesia (Isofluorane) using cervical dislocation before necropsy and tissue collection. All experiments were conducted with approval from the McMaster University Animal Care Committee and McMaster Animal Research Ethics Board (AREB) under the Animal Utilization Protocol (AUP# 210930).

Gluten sensitization and dietary interventions

Mice were sensitized with gluten using a previously established protocol21. Briefly, mice were gavaged with 25μg cholera toxin and 1mg of pepsin/trypsin digested gliadin once a week for 3 weeks. Mice were then switched from a gluten-free diet (TD.05620) to a calorically balanced gluten-containing wheat-based diet (TD.200056) for 3 weeks, and finally returned to GFD for recovery over 2, 6, 10, or 24 weeks. Age-matched naïve controls (non-sensitized, on GFD with no gluten exposure) were used to determine normal and baseline values and compare against experimental groups. Mice receiving fiber-supplemented diets were transitioned over the first week with a 50:50 mixture of no added fiber GFD and either 52.8 g/kg inulin (IN, TD.2100884) diet or 136 g/kg HylonVII (RS, TD.210885) to allow the mice to acclimatize. The total fiber content in the supplemented diets was increased to approximately 15% from a grain-based chow formula with approximately 7.5% dietary fiber. Diet composition is listed in Table 2.

Evaluation of gluten-immunopathology

Cross sections from the proximal small intestine were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin for blinded evaluation using brightfield microscopy (Olympus), as previously described using open-source QuPath software46,47. The CD3+ intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) were quantified by immunohistochemical staining21. The primary antibody, polyclonal rabbit antihuman CD3 (S200389–2; Agilent) was diluted 1μL in 1mL of 1% BSA in PBS and incubated overnight. CD3+ IELs were visualized with 3,3’-diamonobenzideine (DAB+ substrate chromogen system, K346811–2; Agilent) and counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (S330930–2; Agilent) for 60 seconds. CD3+ IELs were quantified in 5 randomly chosen villi tips and reported as the number of IELs per 100 enterocytes. The same paraffin embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for villus-height and crypt-depth measurements for the villus-to-crypt ratio (V/C). Ten villi and adjacent crypt pairs were randomly selected and measured. An equally weighted composite VCIEL scoring system was used to combine histological measures and create a standardized baseline around the naïve control group48.

At necropsy, the small intestine was washed out and contents collected in 0.05M EDTA in PBS with soy trypsin inhibitor (0.1mg/mL; T9128–1G; Sigma) and phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (0.8mM; P7626; Sigma-Aldrich)) to prevent protein degradation. Direct ELISA was performed as previously reported21,46. 96-well plates were coated with either transglutaminase in PBS (0.1 μg per well; T5398–2UN; Sigma-Aldrich) or gliadin dissolved in 70% ethanol and diluted in PBS (5 μg per well; G3375; Sigma-Aldrich). Non-specific binding was blocked with 2% BSA in PBS-Tween before 2-hour incubation of 50 μL small intestinal wash solution in triplicate. Detection with 1 hour incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary anti-mouse IgA antibody (1:5000; 1040–05; Southern Biotech) followed TMB substrate (Agilent) reaction for 20 minutes before measuring absorbance at 450nm using a Spectramax M3 plate reader (Molecular Devices). OD values were normalized to the total amount of protein in the sample using a protein quantification assay (Bio-Rad) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Prevotella cocktail colonization

Ten isolated strains from the Prevotellaceae family were obtained from the collection of Dr. Michael Surette’s Lab (McMaster University), based on their reduced abundance in CeD (Table 3). Isolates identities were confirmed with MALDI-TOF and cultured anaerobically in BHI3 for 48 hours with agitation. NOD/DQ8 mice were gavaged with PBS (negative control) or approximately 1 million cells of each strain combined, given on day 1 and 3 of the inulin diet.

Metabolite determinations

A targeted selected ion monitoring (SIM) gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry (GCMS) protocol was used to quantify SCFA in the small intestinal washes and feces collected at endpoint. GCMS measurements were carried out on an Agilent 5975C inert mass selective detector (MSD) equipped with an Agilent 7890A GC and an Agilent 7693 autosampler (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), in the Centre for Microbial Chemical Biology (CMCB) at McMaster University. Separation of the analytes was achieved on an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) DB-1MS UI (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25μm) column. The injector, ion source, quadrupole and the GCMS interface temperatures were 260, 230, 150, and 280 °C, respectively. The flow rate of helium carrier gas was kept at 1 mL/min. 1 μL of derivatized sample was injected with a 4.5-minute solvent delay time and split ratio of 10:1. The initial column temperature was 40 °C and held for 5 minutes, ramped to 165 °C at the rate of 10 °C/min, and then increased to 310 °C at the rate of 100 °C/min and kept at this temperature for 3 minutes. The total run time was 22 minutes. The ionization was carried out in the electron impact (EI) mode at 70 eV. The MS data were acquired in the SIM mode. The identification of compounds was confirmed by injection of pure standards and comparison of the retention time and target ions.

RNA extraction and quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)

Samples from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and proximal colon were collected in RNALater (Invitrogen) before RNA extraction using RNEasy Mini kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using iScript Reverse Transcriptase (Bio-Rad) with SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (BioRad) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The qPCR cycling consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 seconds and annealing/extension at 65 °C for 30 seconds. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control for normalization of gene expression, and data was reported as the fold change in expression in response to inulin compared to GFD alone. Validated primer sequences for mouse GPR41 (142345193c1) and GPR41 (22122727a1) were obtained from Primer Bank49.

Microbiota sequencing and predicted microbial function.

After genomic DNA extraction, an established protocol consisting of a 2-stage nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify the variable regions 3–4 of the 16S rRNA gene from low biomass samples was used to sequence the mouse duodenum and human aspirates using the MiSeq Illumina platform9. Sequences were then processed in R, version 4.4.2 using the package Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm 2 (DADA250) and the SILVA reference database, version 138.151. FastTree 252 was used to calculate a phylogenetic tree of sequences and data were explored using the phyloseq package53. Functional predictions based on 16S rRNA sequences were made using PICRUSt254, annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database55. Beta-Diversity was calculated using the Aitchison distance56 and differences between groups were calculated using PERMANOVA. Taxonomic and functional microbial differences were evaluated using a generalized linear mixed mode with a negative binomial distribution57 with adjustment for age and sex as confounding variables for patient data. Statistical differences between groups were identified using estimated marginal means using the emmeans package58. 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in Sequence Read Archive (PRJNA1256891)

FoodSeq (Sequencing, bioinformatic pipeline, and diversity analysis).

We performed DNA extraction on randomized fecal samples using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer’s instructions. We prepared libraries using a two-step PCR process59 using trnL g and h primers6062. Primary PCR amplification was conducted as previously described62. Secondary PCR amplification contained 5 μL each of 2.5 μM forward and reverse indexing primers62, 25 μL of 2X KAPA HiFi HotStart Ready Mix, 0.5 μL of 100X SYBR Green I, 9.5 μL nuclease-free water, and 5 μL of primary PCR product diluted 1:100 in nuclease-free water. Amplicon libraries were then cleaned and pooled as previously described62. Paired-end sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiniSeq using a 300-cycle Mid kit (Illumina).

We demultiplexed, trimmed, filtered, and denoised sequence reads using a QIIME263 pipeline v. 2023.5.1 with DADA250 plugin. Sequence reads were aligned to a custom trnL reference database62 (available at https://github.com/LAD-LAB/mb-pipeline/blob/main/reference/trnLGH.fasta) and taxonomic assignments were made using assignSpecies() in the DADA2 R package v. 1.30.0.

We calculated observed richness and Shannon diversity using estimate_richness() in the phyloseq52 R package v. 1.46.0 for each sample after removing taxa unassigned to any dietary species in our reference database. Principal component analysis was performed using prcomp(), centered and not scaled, on CLR-transformed relative abundance data, prior to unassigned taxa removal. A distance matrix was generated using Euclidean distance calculations. PERMANOVA was performed using adonis2() in the vegan R package v. 2.6.6.164 adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity/race, and posthoc pairwise comparisons using pairwiseAdonis() v. 0.4.165, adjusting p-values using the default Bonferroni method. The trnL gene sequences were deposited in Sequence Read Archive (PRJNA1256896)

Statistical analysis.

Graphpad Prism was used for most analyses. Data are presented for each individual sample (human or mouse). All data were first tested for statistical outliers (ROUT, Q=1%) and then for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, such that non-parametric tests were used for non-normally distributed data. For comparisons between two groups, the Student’s t-test or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney was used. For three or more groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used with Tukey’s post hoc test, or the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test. p<0.05 was used to determine statistically significant effects.

Supplementary Material

1

Supplementary Files

This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank McMaster’s AGU staff for their support with germ-free mouse breeding and gnotobiotic experiments. The authors also thank the CeD volunteers who participated in this study. The work was funded by a CIHR grant MOP#142773 to E.F.V. who holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair. M.W. received the JA Campbell Young Investigator Award from Celiac Canada. This work was also supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases award numbers R01-DK128611, R01-DK116187, and T32DK007568. PB holds the Richard Hunt AstraZeneca Chair in Gastroenterology, AC and DA hold the Douglas Family Chairs in Intestinal Research and Nutrition Research respectively. We would like to thank Nikki Henriquez for training and supporting M.W. in the CMCB.

Footnotes

Competing interests statement

None.

References

  • 1.Catassi C., Verdu E. F., Bai J. C. & Lionetti E. Coeliac disease. Lancet (London, England) 399, 2413–2426 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oberhuber G., Granditsch G. & Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.King J. A. et al. Incidence of Celiac Disease Is Increasing Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Off. J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol. | ACG 115, (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gujral N., Freeman H. J. & Thomson A. B. R. Celiac disease: prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. World J. Gastroenterol. 18, 6036–6059 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Galipeau H. J., Hinterleitner R., Leonard M. M. & Caminero A. Non-Host Factors Influencing Onset and Severity of Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology 167, 34–50 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jiang H., Zhang X., Zhou Y., Jiang C. & Shi Y. Infection, antibiotic exposure, and risk of celiac disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 35, 557–566 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kemppainen K. M. et al. Factors That Increase Risk of Celiac Disease Autoimmunity After a Gastrointestinal Infection in Early Life. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Off. Clin. Pract. J. Am. Gastroenterol. Assoc. 15, 694–702.e5 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mårild K., Kahrs C. R., Tapia G., Stene L. C. & Størdal K. Infections and risk of celiac disease in childhood: a prospective nationwide cohort study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 110, 1475–1484 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Constante M. et al. Biogeographic Variation and Functional Pathways of the Gut Microbiota in Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology 163, 1351–1363.e15 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Caminero A. et al. Duodenal Bacteria From Patients With Celiac Disease and Healthy Subjects Distinctly Affect Gluten Breakdown and Immunogenicity. Gastroenterology 151, 670–683 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nistal E. et al. Differences of small intestinal bacteria populations in adults and children with/without celiac disease: effect of age, gluten diet, and disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 18, 649–656 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barroso M. et al. Dietary Patterns After the Weaning and Lactation Period Are Associated With Celiac Disease Autoimmunity in Children. Gastroenterology 154, 2087–2096.e7 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hård af Segerstad E. M. et al. Early Dietary Fiber Intake Reduces Celiac Disease Risk in Genetically Prone Children: Insights from the TEDDY study. Gastroenterology (2025) doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.01.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gill P. A., van Zelm M. C., Muir J. G. & Gibson P. R. Review article: short chain fatty acids as potential therapeutic agents in human gastrointestinal and inflammatory disorders. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 48, 15–34 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gill S. K., Rossi M., Bajka B. & Whelan K. Dietary fibre in gastrointestinal health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 101–116 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pinto-Sanchez M. I., Blom J.-J., Gibson P. R. & Armstrong D. Nutrition Assessment and Management in Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology 167, 116–131.e1 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prasoodanan P. K., V. et al. Western and non-western gut microbiomes reveal new roles of Prevotella in carbohydrate metabolism and mouth–gut axis. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 77 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tanno H. et al. Characterization of fructooligosaccharide metabolism and fructooligosaccharide-degrading enzymes in human commensal butyrate producers. Gut Microbes 13, 1869503 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hebden L., Kostan E., O’Leary F., Hodge A. & Allman-Farinelli M. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire as a measure of recent dietary intake in young adults. PLoS One 8, e75156 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petrone B. L. et al. Metaproteomics and DNA metabarcoding as tools to assess dietary intake in humans. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology (2024) doi: 10.1101/2024.04.09.588275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Galipeau H. J. et al. Sensitization to gliadin induces moderate enteropathy and insulitis in nonobese diabetic-DQ8 mice. J. Immunol. 187, 4338–4346 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gibson P. R., Halmos E. P. & Muir J. G. Review article: FODMAPS, prebiotics and gut health-the FODMAP hypothesis revisited. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 52, 233–246 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murray J. A. et al. Mucosal atrophy in celiac disease: extent of involvement, correlation with clinical presentation, and response to treatment. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Off. Clin. Pract. J. Am. Gastroenterol. Assoc. 6, 186–93; quiz 125 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chang L. et al. American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation. Gastroenterology 164, 1086–1106 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lund-Blix N. A. et al. Maternal fibre and gluten intake during pregnancy and risk of childhood celiac disease: the MoBa study. Sci. Rep. 10, 16439 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bédard M. & Ledrou I. Canadian Community Health Survey Cycle 2.2-Nutrition, 2004. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Raffaella D. C. et al. Different Fecal Microbiotas and Volatile Organic Compounds in Treated and Untreated Children with Celiac Disease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 3963–3971 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Di Cagno R. et al. Duodenal and faecal microbiota of celiac children: molecular, phenotype and metabolome characterization. BMC Microbiol. 11, 219 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tett A., Pasolli E., Masetti G., Ercolini D. & Segata N. Prevotella diversity, niches and interactions with the human host. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 585–599 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bodkhe R. et al. Human gut-derived commensal suppresses generation of T-cell response to gliadin in humanized mice by modulating gut microbiota. Anaerobe 68, 102237 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Balakrishnan B. et al. Small intestinal derived Prevotella histicola simulates biologic as a therapeutic agent. Sci. Rep. 14, 29217 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sonnenburg E. D. et al. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature 529, 212–215 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.González M. P. et al. Determination and Comparison of Fat and Fibre Contents in Gluten-Free and Gluten-Containing Flours and Breads: Nutritional Implications. Foods vol. 14 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Karell K. et al. Hla types in celiac disease patients not carrying the DQA1*05-DQB1*02 (DQ2) heterodimer: results from the european genetics cluster on celiac disease. Hum. Immunol. 64, 469–477 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Galipeau H. J. et al. Intestinal Microbiota Modulates Gluten-Induced Immunopathology in Humanized Mice. Am. J. Pathol. 185, 2969–2982 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Caminero A. et al. Duodenal bacterial proteolytic activity determines sensitivity to dietary antigen through protease-activated receptor-2. Nat. Commun. 10, 1198 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lynch J. B. et al. Gut microbiota Turicibacter strains differentially modify bile acids and host lipids. Nat. Commun. 14, 3669 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baltazar-Díaz T. A. et al. Escherichia/Shigella, SCFAs, and Metabolic Pathways-The Triad That Orchestrates Intestinal Dysbiosis in Patients with Decompensated Alcoholic Cirrhosis from Western Mexico. Microorganisms 10, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hu J. et al. Correlation between altered gut microbiota and elevated inflammation markers in patients with Crohn’s disease. Front. Immunol. 13, 947313 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sperber A. D. et al. Worldwide Prevalence and Burden of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Results of Rome Foundation Global Study. Gastroenterology 160, 99–114.e3 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kulich K. R. et al. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in dyspepsia: a six-country study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 6, 12 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Santiago A. et al. Crohn’s disease proteolytic microbiota enhances inflammation through PAR2 pathway in gnotobiotic mice. Gut Microbes 15, 2205425 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rueda G. H. et al. Oral tryptophan activates duodenal aryl hydrocarbon receptor in healthy subjects: a crossover randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 326, G687–G696 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kudva Y. C. et al. Modulation of insulitis and type 1 diabetes by transgenic HLA-DR3 and DQ8 in NOD mice lacking endogenous MHC class II. Hum. Immunol. 63, 987–999 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Marietta E. et al. A new model for dermatitis herpetiformis that uses HLA-DQ8 transgenic NOD mice. J. Clin. Invest. 114, 1090–1097 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bruno L. et al. Evaluating the Effects of Chronic Oral Exposure to the Food Additive Silicon Dioxide on Oral Tolerance Induction and Food Sensitivities in Mice. Environ. Health Perspect. 132, 27007 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bankhead P. et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 16878 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Syage J. A. et al. A Composite Morphometric Duodenal Biopsy Mucosal Scale for Celiac Disease Encompassing Both Morphology and Inflammation. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 22, 1238–1244.e3 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang X., Spandidos A., Wang H. & Seed B. PrimerBank: a PCR primer database for quantitative gene expression analysis, 2012 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1144–D1149 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Callahan B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Quast C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–6 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Price M. N., Dehal P. S. & Arkin A. P. FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments. PLoS One 5, e9490 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.McMurdie P. J. & Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8, e61217 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Douglas G. M. et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 685–688 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kanehisa M., Sato Y., Kawashima M., Furumichi M. & Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D457–D462 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Aitchison J., Barceló-Vidal C., Martín-Fernández J. A. & Pawlowsky-Glahn V. Logratio Analysis and Compositional Distance. Math. Geol. 32, 271–275 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang X. et al. Negative binomial mixed models for analyzing microbiome count data. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lenth R. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.7. 2. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gohl D. M. et al. Systematic improvement of amplicon marker gene methods for increased accuracy in microbiome studies. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 942–949 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Taberlet P. et al. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, e14 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Reese A. T. et al. Using DNA Metabarcoding To Evaluate the Plant Component of Human Diets: a Proof of Concept. mSystems 4, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Petrone B. L. et al. Diversity of plant DNA in stool is linked to dietary quality, age, and household income. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2304441120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bolyen E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Oksanen J. et al. Vegan Community Ecology Package Version 2.6–8. 2024.
  • 65.Martinez Arbizu P. pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise multilevel comparison using adonis. R Packag. version 0.4 1, (2020). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES