Abstract
We have measured the frequency of UV-induced reversions (locus plus suppressor) for the ochre alleles ade2–1 and lys2–1 and forward mutations (ade2 adex double auxotrophs) in an excision-deficient strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (rad2–20). For very low UV doses, both mutational systems exhibit linear induction kinetics. However, as the dose increases, a strikingly different response is observed: in the selective reversion system a transition to higher order induction kinetics occurs near 9 ergs/mm2 (25% survival), whereas in the nonselective forward system the mutation frequency passes through a maximum near 14 ergs/mm 2 (4.4% survival) and then declines. This contrast in kinetics cannot be explained in any straightforward way by current models of induced mutagenesis, which have been developed primarily on the basis of bacterial data. The bacterial models are designed to accommodate the quadratic induction kinetics that are frequently observed in these systems. We have derived a mathematical expression for mutation frequency that enables us to fit both the forward and reversion data on the assumptions that mutagenesis is basically a "single event" Poisson process, and that mutation and killing are not necessarily independent of one another. In particular, the dose-response relations are consistent with the idea that the sensitivity of the revertants is about 25% less than that of the original cell population, whereas the sensitivity of the forward mutants is about 29% greater than the population average. We argue that this relatively small differential sensitivity of mutant and nonmutant cells is associated with events that take place during mutation expression and clonal growth.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bresler S. E., Kalinin V. L., Kopylova Y. U., Krivisky A. S., Rybchin V. N., Shelegedin V. N. Study of genetic effects of high energy radiations with different ionizing capacities on extracellular phages. Mutat Res. 1975 Jul;29(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(75)90017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brewen J. G., Preston R. J. Cytogenetic effects of environmental mutagens in mammalian cells and the extrapolation to man. Mutat Res. 1974 Aug;26(4):297–305. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(74)80027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brewen J. G., Preston R. J., Jones K. P., Gosslee D. G. Genetic hazards of ionizing radiations: cytogenetic extrapolations from mouse to man. Mutat Res. 1973 Feb;17(2):245–254. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(73)90173-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bridges B. A. A note on the mechanism of UV mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Mutat Res. 1966 Aug;3(4):273–279. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(66)90034-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bridges B. A., Huckle J. Mutagenesis of cultured mammalian cells by X-radiation and ultraviolet light. Mutat Res. 1970 Aug;10(2):141–151. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(70)90159-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bridges B. A., Mottershead R. P., Colella C. Induction of forward mutations to colicin E2 resistance in repair deficient strains of Escherichia coli: experiments with ultraviolet light and captan. Mutat Res. 1973 Dec;21(6):303–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang L. T., Lennox J. E., Tuveson R. W. Induced mutation in UV-sensitive mutants of Aspergillus nidulans and Neurospora crassa. Mutat Res. 1968 Mar-Apr;5(2):217–224. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(68)90019-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doudney C O, Young C S. Ultraviolet Light Induced Mutation and Deoxyribonucleic Acid Replication in Bacteria. Genetics. 1962 Sep;47(9):1125–1138. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.9.1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drake J. W. Ultraviolet mutagenesis in bacteriophage T-4. I. Irradiation of extracellular phage particles. J Bacteriol. 1966 May;91(5):1775–1780. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.5.1775-1780.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eckardt F., Kowalskí S., Laskowski W. The effects of three rad genes on UV induced mutation rates in haploid and diploid Saccharomyces cells. Mol Gen Genet. 1975;136(3):261–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00334021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kilbey B. J. Mutagenesis in yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 1975;12:209–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondo S. A theoretical study on spontaneous mutation rate. Mutat Res. 1972 Apr;14(4):365–374. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(72)90133-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence C. W., Stewart J. W., Sherman F., Christensen R. Specificity and frequency of ultraviolet-induced reversion of an iso-1-cytochrome c ochre mutant in radiation-sensitive strains of yeast. J Mol Biol. 1974 May 5;85(1):137–162. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90134-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mennigmann H. D. Pyrimidine dimers as pre-mutational lesions in Escherichia coli WP2 Hcr. Mol Gen Genet. 1972;117(2):167–186. doi: 10.1007/BF00267613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sparrow A. H., Underbrink A. G., Rossi H. H. Mutations induced in Tradescantia by small doses of x-rays and neutrons: analysis of dose-Response curves. Science. 1972 May 26;176(4037):916–918. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4037.916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Unrau P., Wheatcroft R., Cox B., Olive T. The formation of pyrimidine dimers in the DNA of fungi and bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Jul 27;312(4):626–632. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(73)90065-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WEBBER B. B., DESERRES F. J. INDUCTION KINETICS AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF X-RAY-INDUCED MUTATIONS IN THE AD-3 REGION OF NEUROSPORA CRASSA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Feb;53:430–437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.2.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wheatcroft R., Cox B. S., Haynes R. H. Repair of UV-induced DNA damage and survival in yeast. I. Dimer excision. Mutat Res. 1975 Nov;30(2):209–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Zeeland A. A., Simons J. U. The use of correction factors in the determination of mutant frequencies in populations of human diploid skin fibroblasts. Mutat Res. 1976 Jan;34(1):149–158. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(76)90268-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
