Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1977 May;86(1):227–236. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.1.227

The Effects of Overdominance on Linkage in a Multilocus System

Tsuneyuki Yamazaki 1
PMCID: PMC1213667  PMID: 885342

Abstract

Computer simulations were performed with overdominant multiple alleles among tightly linked multiple loci under a multiplicative fitness model. The quantity X2/N(n — 1) was introduced as a new measure of linkage disequilibrium which, unlike previously available measures, can be applied to multiple allele models, where N is the sample size, and n is the number of alleles at the locus possessing fewest alleles. Simulations showed that (1) With multiple (three or four) alleles, the approach to stable disequilibrium is slower and the amount of disequilibrium established is weaker than in a two allele system. (2) The number of complementary chromosomes is a function of number of alleles and of population size. (3) As population size increases, the rate of the approach to stable disequilibrium is slower. (4) There is an optimum selection coefficient which minimizes the transient fixation probability of alleles when linkage is present. (5) The absence of linkage disequilibrium is in most cases not a practical method of testing the hypothesis of balancing selection of genetic polymorphisms because it depends strongly on population size in determining linkage disequilibria.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (599.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Frankham R. The nature of quantitative genetic variation in Drosophila. III. Mechanism of dosage compensation for sex-linked abdominal bristle polygenes. Genetics. 1977 Jan;85(1):185–191. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Singh R. S., Hubby J. L., Throckmorton L. H. The study of genic variation by electrophoretic and heat denaturation techniques at the octanol dehydrogenase locus in members of the Drosophila virilis group. Genetics. 1975 Jul;(3):637–650. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Slatkin M. On treating the chromosome as the unit of selection. Genetics. 1972 Sep;72(1):157–168. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wills C., Crenshaw J., Vitale J. A computer model allowing maintenance of large amounts of genetic variability in mendelian populations. I. Assumptions and results for large populations. Genetics. 1970 Jan;64(1):107–123. doi: 10.1093/genetics/64.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zouros E., Krimbas C. B. Evidence for Linkage Disequilibrium Maintained by Selection in Two Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA. Genetics. 1973 Apr;73(4):659–674. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.4.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES