Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1977 Jun;86(2):455–483.

Statistical Studies on Protein Polymorphism in Natural Populations I. Distribution of Single Locus Heterozygosity

Paul A Fuerst 1, Ranajit Chakraborty 1, Masatoshi Nei 1
PMCID: PMC1213687  PMID: 881122

Abstract

Surveying the literature, the frequency distribution of single-locus heterozygosity among protein loci was examined in 95 vertebrate and 34 invertebrate species with the aim of testing the validity of the mutation-drift hypothesis. This distribution did not differ significantly from that expected under the mutation-drift hypothesis for any of the species examined when tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit statistic. The agreement between the observed interlocus variance of heterozygosity and its theoretical expectation was also satisfactory. There was an indication that variation in the mutation rate among loci inflates the interlocus variance of heterozygosity. The variance of heterozygosity for a homologous locus among different species was also studied. This variance generally agreed with the theoretical value very well, though in some groups of Drosophila species there was a significant discrepancy. The observed relationship between average heterozygosity and the proportion of polymorphic loci was in good agreement with the theoretical relationship. It was concluded that, with respect to the pattern of distribution of heterozygosity, the majority of data on protein polymorphisms are consistent with the mutation-drift hypothesis. After examining alternative possible explanations involving selection, it was concluded that the present data cannot be explained adequately without considering a large effect of random genetic drift, whether there is selection or not.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avise J. C., Smith M. H., Selander R. K. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. VI. The boylii species group. J Mammal. 1974 Nov;55(4):751–763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayala F. J., Tracey M. L., Barr L. G., McDonald J. F., Pérez-Salas S. Genetic variation in natural populations of five Drosophila species and the hypothesis of the selective neutrality of protein polymorphisms. Genetics. 1974 Jun;77(2):343–384. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayala F. J., Valentine J. W., Barr L. G., Zumwalt G. S. Genetic variability in a temperate intertidal phoronid, Phoronopsis viridis. Biochem Genet. 1974 Jun;11(6):413–427. doi: 10.1007/BF00486075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Band H. T. A survey of isozyme polymorphism in a Drosophila melanogaster natural population. Genetics. 1975 Aug;80(4):761–771. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.4.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blake N. M., Omoto K. Phosphoglucomutase types in the Asian-Pacific area: a critical reveiw including new phenotypes. Ann Hum Genet. 1975 Jan;38(3):251–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonnel M. L., Selander R. K. Elephant seals: genetic variation and near extinction. Science. 1974 May 24;184(4139):908–909. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4139.908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaufman D. W., Selander R. K., Smith M. H. Genic heterozygosity in a population of Eutamias panamintinus. J Mammal. 1973 Aug;54(3):776–778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M. Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles. Genet Res. 1968 Jun;11(3):247–269. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300011459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirby G. C., Halliday R. B. Another view of neutral alleles in natural populations. Nature. 1973 Feb 16;241(5390):463–464. doi: 10.1038/241463b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kojima K., Gillespie J., Toari Y. N. A profile of Drosophila species' enzymes assayed by electrophoresis. I. Number of alleles, heterozygosities, and linkage disequilibrium in glucose-metabolizing systems and some other enzymes. Biochem Genet. 1970 Oct;4(5):627–637. doi: 10.1007/BF00486100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li W. H. A Mixed Model of Mutation for Electrophoretic Identity of Proteins within and between Populations. Genetics. 1976 Jun;83(2):423–432. doi: 10.1093/genetics/83.2.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li W. H., Nei M. Drift variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance in transient states. Genet Res. 1975 Jun;25(3):229–248. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300015664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McDermid E. M., Bonner W. N. Red cell and serum protein systems of grey seals and habour seals. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1975 Jan 15;50(1):97–101. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(75)90306-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moran P. A. Wandering distributions and the electrophoretic profile. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Dec;8(3):318–330. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nei M., Chakraborty R., Fuerst P. A. Infinite allele model with varying mutation rate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):4164–4168. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.4164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nei M., Fuerst P. A., Chakraborty R. Testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by distribution of single locus heterozygosity. Nature. 1976 Aug 5;262(5568):491–493. doi: 10.1038/262491a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nevo E., Dessauer H. C., Chuang K. C. Genetic variation as a test of natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2145–2149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Patton J. L., MacArthur H., Yang S. Y. Systematic relationships of the four-toed populations of Dipodomys heermanni. J Mammal. 1976 Feb;57(1):159–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Prakash S. Genic variation in a natural population of Drosophila persimilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Mar;62(3):778–784. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.3.778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Prakash S., Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):841–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES