Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1977 Jul;86(3):665–678. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.3.665

The Detection of Sympatric Sibling Species Using Genetic Correlation Analysis. I. Two Loci, Two Gamodemes

M E Makela 1,2, R H Richardson 1,2
PMCID: PMC1213702  PMID: 892427

Abstract

Four models are presented describing zygotic frequencies at two loci for one or two sympatric but genetically differentiated populations or "gamodemes." Linkage disequilibrium within gamodemes is allowed in two of the models. Maximum likelihood criteria are used to fit the models to the observed numbers of zygotes in a sample. A fitting-testing sequence for choosing a best model is described and the power of the test is analyzed. The statistical characteristics of the genetic parameter estimates were examined by simulation studies. In general, estimates were reliable when allele frequency differences between gamodemes were greater than 0.30 at both loci. This method may be used to study the population structure of samples with fewer heterozygotes than expected for Hardy-Weinberg populations, including the detection and genetic description of sibling species having overlapping ranges.—An example is given for Drosophila longicornis and D. propachuca , two sibling species within the mulleri complex of the repleta group which have been studied in detail using more conventional techniques. The reanalysis using the approach derived in this paper confirmed the reproductive isolation of these two species, and hinted at the possibility of further subdivision within D. propachuca.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (817.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R. Allozymes as diagnostic characters of sibling species of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 May;69(5):1094–1096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.5.1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayala F. J., Valentine J. W., Barr L. G., Zumwalt G. S. Genetic variability in a temperate intertidal phoronid, Phoronopsis viridis. Biochem Genet. 1974 Jun;11(6):413–427. doi: 10.1007/BF00486075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christiansen F. B., Frydenberg O., Gyldenholm A. O., Simonsen V. Genetics of Zoarces populations. VI. Further evidence, based on age group samples, of a heterozygote deficit in the EstIII polymorphism. Hereditas. 1974;77(2):225–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GILMOUR J. S., HESLOP-HARRISON J. The deme terminology and the units of micro-evolutionary change. Genetica. 1954;27(1-2):147–161. doi: 10.1007/BF01664158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grassle J., Grassle J. F. Sibling species in the marine pollution indicator Capitella (polychaeta). Science. 1976 May 7;192(4239):567–569. doi: 10.1126/science.1257794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guttman S. I., Wilson K. G. Genetic variation in the genus Bufo. I. An extreme degree of transferrin and albumin polymorphism in a population of the American toad (Bufo americanus). Biochem Genet. 1973 Apr;8(4):329–340. doi: 10.1007/BF00487338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hill W. G. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium in randomly mating populations. Heredity (Edinb) 1974 Oct;33(2):229–239. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1974.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Richardson R. H., Smouse P. E., Richardson M. E. Patterns of molecular variation. II. associations of electrophoretic mobility and larval substrate within species of the Drosophila mulleri complex. Genetics. 1977 Jan;85(1):141–154. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES