Abstract
Introduction. Actinomyces species colonizing the human oropharynx and gastrointestinal and urogenital tract are associated with a wide range of infections. The isolation of Actinomyces spp. from sterile clinical samples is regarded as significant.
Gap Statement. Increased use of advanced diagnostics has caused an increased detection of Actinomyces in the bloodstream, the clinical significance of which is unclear.
Aim. To investigate the clinical factors associated with true Actinomyces bacteraemia that could aid in differentiating it from transient Actinomyces bacteraemia.
Methodology. We conducted a retrospective study of all inpatients with Actinomyces bacteraemia from two tertiary care centres from 1 January 2006 to 26 September 2021. Data were collected on demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, primary source of infection and outcomes. True bacteraemia was defined as Actinomyces bacteraemia with systemic manifestations of infection.
Results. A total of 82 cases of positive blood cultures were identified, of which 33 (40.2%) were true bacteraemia, based on clinical criteria. Patients with true bacteraemia were more likely to be older (P=0.007), have chronic skin ulcers (P<0.001), have a history of central line placement within 3 months of their presentation (P=0.04), have had a fever within 72 h of admission (P=0.05) and have presented with an abscess (P<0.001) compared with patients with transient bacteraemia. True bacteraemia was more likely to be associated with positive tissue cultures (P=0.02) and an infectious disease consultation than transient bacteraemia. Skin and soft tissue (27.3%) was the most common source followed by intra-abdominal (21.1%). Among true bacteraemia, the most common species was Actinomyces meyeri with a ratio of 1:8 (transient versus true bacteraemia). All-cause mortality was 30.3% in patients with true bacteraemia compared with 4.1% in patients with transient bacteraemia (P<0.001).
Conclusion. Predictors of true Actinomyces bacteraemia included older age, fever within 72 h of admission, presence of abscess and chronic skin disease. Actinomyces species exhibit varying degrees of invasiveness, with A. meyeri potentially showing higher invasive potential. Better awareness and involvement of infectious disease specialists is recommended in determining the clinical significance of transient Actinomyces bacteraemia and can help implement antibiotic stewardship and patient safety and improve outcomes. Further research will help to identify the true importance of these isolates.
Keywords: Actinomyces bacteraemia, mortality associated with Actinomyces, risk factors associated with Actinomyces
Introduction
Actinomyces species are filamentous Gram-positive bacilli, mainly belonging to the human commensal flora of the oropharynx, gastrointestinal tract and urogenital tract [1]. Actinomyces species can cause actinomycosis, a chronic granulomatous lesion, forming suppurative abscesses and draining sinuses. The most common sites of infection are cervico-facial (50%), abdominal (20%) and thoracic (15%); the remainder are pelvic and cutaneous (15%) [2]. Of note, in any site, actinomycosis frequently mimics malignancy, tuberculosis or other mycobacterium, as it spreads continuously and progressively and often forms a cold abscess [3,6]. More than 30 species of Actinomyces have been described. Actinomyces israelii is the most prevalent species isolated in human infections and is found in most clinical forms of actinomycosis [7]. Some other species, including Actinomyces odontolyticus, Actinomyces gerencseriae (formerly A. israelii serotype 2), Actinomyces meyeri, Actinomyces turicensis, Actinomyces europaeus and Actinomyces cardiffensis, have been associated with disseminated cases with or without bacteraemia [8,15].
Historically, the isolation of Actinomyces spp. from sterile clinical specimens has always been considered important [16]. With the use of newer technologies such as matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS, however, an increase in the isolation of Actinomyces spp. from blood cultures has been reported [17]. In a retrospective study of 60 patients with Actinomyces bacteraemia, only 10 received treatment for actinomycosis. Patients with transient bacteraemia without any treatment did not show any apparent negative impact on clinical outcomes [17]. Thus, the isolation of Actinomyces spp. from blood cultures of patients without clinical disease raises the question of whether these organisms are contaminants or represent transitory bacteraemia due to translocation. An understanding of the factors that can help differentiate between true and transient bacteraemia episodes will be helpful in disease management.
This study investigated the clinical factors associated with true Actinomyces bacteraemia that could aid in differentiating it from transient Actinomyces bacteraemia.
Methods
This study was a historical cohort study of all inpatients with Actinomyces bacteraemia from two academic tertiary care centres from 1 January 2006 to 26 September 2021. Data were collected by retrospective chart review. Cases of Actinomyces bacteraemia were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, respectively, for actinomycosis (039.9 and A42.9), bacteraemia (790.7 and R78.81) and sepsis (995.91/995.92 and R65.20/R65.21/A41.4/A42.7). We reviewed microbiology records to confirm the presence of Actinomyces bacteraemia in all patients.
Before 2015, the RapID ANA II Identification system was used to identify Actinomyces bacteraemia, or samples were sent to a reference lab. Since 2015, the MALDI-TOF MS analyser has been utilized.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRBNET number RMIJ20210317).
Data collection
The following data elements were recorded for each patient with Actinomyces bacteraemia: demographics, comorbid conditions, clinical characteristics, implicated source, Actinomyces species and treatment given.
Definitions
True bacteraemia was defined as Actinomyces bacteraemia with systemic signs of infection.
Transient bacteraemia was defined as Actinomyces bacteraemia without systemic manifestations of infection. Sources of bacteraemia included oropharyngeal, cutaneous, respiratory tract, endovascular source (aneurysms, vascular grafts or other endovascular devices), endocarditis, osteomyelitis, miscellaneous and unknown (systemic signs of infection without an obvious source or in the presence of multiple potential sources). To account for the burden of comorbidities, the Charlson weighted index of comorbidity was computed. Immunosuppressed status included human immunodeficiency virus positivity, neutropenia with absolute neutrophil counts less than 500 cells per microliter at the time of presentation, receipt of steroids (equivalent to at least 16 mg of prednisone per day for at least 5 days consecutively), a fever in the prior 72 h or at the time of presentation, receipt of chemotherapy or radiotherapy or anti-tumour necrosis factor-α therapy in the past 3 months and history of bone marrow or solid organ transplant. Renal impairment was defined as mild if serum creatinine was 1.5–2-fold higher than baseline or severe if it were 2-fold higher than baseline or if the patient received haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
Statistical methods
Descriptive statistics were generated to characterize the study population. Continuous variables were described as the mean with sd or median with interquartile range. The association between clinical and demographic factors and outcomes was assessed using Student’s t-test and ANOVA for the comparison of means and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Multivariable analysis was done using logistic regression. All data were analysed using SPSS v. 29.0, and a P-value of 0.05 or less was considered to indicate statistical significance. The study was approved by the Ascension Institutional Review Board.
Results
In this study, 82 cases of positive blood cultures with Actinomyces were identified. Of these, 40.2% (33) were diagnosed with true bacteraemia, whereas transient bacteraemia was diagnosed in 59.8% (49). The mean (sd) age of 82 patients with bacteraemia was 54.9 (±27.2) years; 54.9% (45) were female, and 76.8% (63) were black/African American. Common comorbid conditions in patients included diabetes mellitus (DM) (29.3%), myocardial infarction (MI) (24.4%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (20.7%), congestive heart failure (CHF) (14.6%) and cerebrovascular disease (14.6%). Chronic skin ulcers were noted in 18.3% of patients, while 12.2% had immunosuppression. A history of hospitalization and invasive procedures within 90 days of bacteraemia was noted in 32.9% and 28% of patients, respectively. Within 3 months of bacteraemia, 9.8% of patients had a central line placed.
Patients with true bacteraemia had a higher mean age than those with transient bacteraemia, 63.9±19.5 versus 48.8±30.0 years, respectively (P=0.007). Patients with true bacteraemia were more likely to have chronic skin ulcers (P<0.001), a history of central line placement within 3 months of their presentation (P=0.04), a fever within 72 h of admission (P=0.05) and to have presented with an abscess (P<0.001) compared with patients with transient bacteraemia. True bacteraemia was more likely to be associated with positive tissue cultures (P=0.02) and an infectious disease consultation (P<0.001) than transient bacteraemia (Table 1). All-cause mortality was 30.3% in patients with true bacteraemia compared with 4.1% in patients with transient bacteraemia (P<0.001). The most common sources of infection in true bacteraemia were skin and soft tissue 27.3% (9), followed by intra-abdominal 21.1% (7), osteomyelitis 15.2% (5), respiratory 12.1% (4), odontogenic 6.1% (2), endovascular 6.1% (2), endocarditis 3% (1) and genitourinary 3% (1). In 6.1% (2) of cases, no specific source of infection was identified.
Table 1. Univariable analysis of factors associated with true Actinomyces bacteraemia.
| Characteristic | Transient bacteraemia (n=49) | True bacteraemia (n=33) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years (mean±sd) | 48.8±30.0 | 63.9±19.5 | 0.007 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 23 (46.9) | 14 (42.4) | 0.69 |
| Female | 26 (53.1) | 19 (57.6) | |
| Race | |||
| White | 8 (16.3) | 5 (15.2) | 0.39 |
| Black | 39 (79.6) | 24 (72.7) | |
| Others | 2 (4.1) | 4 (12.1) | |
| Median CWIC (range) | 2 (0, 12) | 2 (0, 12) | 0.24 |
| MI | 12 (24.5) | 8 (24.2) | 0.98 |
| CHF | 7 (14.3) | 5 (15.2) | 0.91 |
| COPD | 11 (22.4) | 6 (18.2) | 0.64 |
| Peripheral vascular disease | 2 (4.1) | 5 (15.2) | 0.08 |
| DM without complications | 7 (14.3) | 7 (21.2) | 0.41 |
| DM with complications | 5 (10.2) | 5 (15.2) | 0.50 |
| Dementia | 4 (8.2) | 5 (15.2) | 0.32 |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 6 (12.2) | 6 (18.2) | 0.46 |
| Hemiplegia | 4 (8.2) | 3 (9.1) | 0.88 |
| Peptic ulcer disease | 4 (8.2) | 6 (18.2) | 0.17 |
| Mild liver disease | 3 (6.1) | 1 (3.0) | 0.52 |
| Severe liver disease | 0 | 1 (3.0) | |
| Haemodialysis | 5 (10.2) | 3 (9.1) | 0.87 |
| Immunosuppressed status | 7 (14.3) | 3 (9.1) | 0.48 |
| Chronic skin ulcer | 3 (6.1) | 12 (36.4) | <0.001 |
| Active malignancy | 6 (12.2) | 4 (12.1) | 0.99 |
| Metastatic disease | 4 (8.2) | 2 (6.1) | 0.72 |
| Recent hospitalization in the last 3 months | 17 (34.7) | 10 (30.3) | 0.68 |
| Invasive procedures in the last 3 months | 13 (26.5) | 10 (30.3) | 0.71 |
| Dental procedures in the last 3 months | 0 | 1 (3.0) | |
| Central lines in the last 3 months | 2 (4.1) | 6 (18.2) | 0.04 |
| Rash | 2 (4.1) | 2 (6.1) | 0.68 |
| Swelling or skin mass | 3 (6.1) | 3 (9.1) | 0.61 |
| Fever within 72 h of admission | 16 (32.7) | 18 (54.5) | 0.05 |
| Timing of positive blood culture | 0.70 | ||
| Within first 48 h | 40 (81.6) | 28 (84.8) | 0.26 |
| After 48 h | 9 (18.4) | 5 (15.2) | 0.006 |
| Polymicrobial | 19 (38.8) | 16 (48.5) | 0.38 |
| Infectious disease consultation | 19 (38.8) | 26 (78.8) | <0.001 |
| Abscess | 2 (4.1) | 10 (30.3) | <0.001 |
| Wound cultures | 1 (2.1) | 4 (12.5) | 0.06 |
| Tissue cultures | 2 (4.1) | 7 (21.2) | 0.02 |
CWIC, Charlson weighted index of comorbidity; n, Number; SD, Standard deviation.
In 84.8% (28) cases of true bacteraemia, Actinomyces were isolated to the species level (Table 2). The most common species was A. meyeri 24.2% (8) followed by A. odontolyticus 21.2% (7), A. israelii 21.2% (7), A. turicensis 12.1% (4) and Actinomyces neuii 6.1% (2).
Table 2. Actinomyces species isolated by cases.
| Actinomyces species | Total case (n=82) (%) | Transient bacteraemia (n=49) (%) | True bacteraemia (n=33) (%) | Ratio of transient bacteraemia to true bacteraemia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. odontolyticus | 29 (35.4) | 22 (44.9) | 7 (21.2) | 1:0.32 |
| A. israelii | 16 (19.5) | 9 (18.4) | 7 (21.2) | 1:0.78 |
| Actinomyces undifferentiated | 13 (15.9) | 8 (16.3) | 5 (15.2) | 1:0.62 |
| A. meyeri | 9 (11) | 1 (2) | 8 (24.2) | 1:8 |
| A. neuii | 6 (7.3) | 4 (8.2) | 2 (6.1) | 1:0.5 |
| A. turicensis | 5 (6.1) | 1 (2) | 4 (12.1) | 1:4 |
| Actinomyces oris | 3 (3.7) | 3 (6.1) | 0 | |
| Actinomyces naeslundii | 1 (1.2) | 1 (2) | 0 |
n, Number.
In cases of true bacteraemia, A. meyeri was the most common species, with a ratio of transient bacteraemia to true bacteraemia of 1:8. On the other hand, A. odontolyticus was the most common species among transient bacteraemia, with a ratio of 1:0.32. No cases of Actinomyces oris and Actinomyces naeslundii were seen among true bacteraemia (Table 2).
On multivariable analysis, predictors of true bacteraemia included older age (P=0.003), fever within 72 h of admission (P=0.024), presence of abscess (P=0.007) and chronic skin disease (P=0.003) (Table 3).
Table 3. Multivariable analysis of factors associated with true Actinomyces bacteraemia.
| Variable | Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.06 (1.02–1.09) | 0.003 |
| Fever within 72 h of admission | 4.11 (1.21–13.98) | 0.024 |
| Abscess | 15.31 (2.09–111.96) | 0.007 |
| Chronic skin ulcers | 11.34 (2.24–57.56) | 0.003 |
Discussion
In our study cohort, the incidence of true Actinomyces bacteraemia was 40.2%. Previous studies have reported that the incidence of Actinomyces bacteraemia varies between 16.7% and 80%. An earlier study found that the incidence of Actinomyces bacteraemia was lower than ours, at 16.7%, based on 60 cases. In this historical cohort study, only 10 out of 60 cases were treated with antibiotics because of identified clinical risk factors. The use of antibiotics in these instances may serve as a surrogate indicator of actual bacteraemia. In contrast, we defined true Actinomyces bacteraemia based on the systemic manifestations of infection at the time of their presentation [17]. The other two studies that reported higher incidences of Actinomyces bacteraemia than our study were case series. They reported cases of A. odontolyticus bacteraemia, with 76.2% (16/21) and 80% (12/15) of the patients receiving antibiotics [18,19].
Our study findings also included independent predictors of true Actinomyces bacteraemia: older age, fever within 72 h of admission, presence of abscess and chronic skin ulcers. Our study is the first clinical study to compare patients with true versus transient Actinomyces bacteraemia to assess the factors associated with true Actinomyces bacteraemia. Most prior studies identifying the risk factors for Actinomyces bacteraemia were based on case reports or case series [19]. Another study assessed the risk factors associated with serious Actinomyces bacteraemia in patients who were treated for the bacteremic episodes versus those who were not treated. Unlike our study, the above study did not assess the systemic signs of infections at the time of Actinomyces bacteraemia [17].
Our study found that age is an independent risk factor for Actinomyces bacteraemia. Every 1-year increase in age increased the risk of Actinomyces bacteraemia by 6%. In a previous case series of A. odontolyticus bacteraemia, approximately one-third of the reported cases involved individuals aged 60 years and older [20]. Four out of seven elderly patients in this study were immunosuppressed. One study of Actinomyces bacteraemia found a median age of 57 years [21]. In another case series on actinomycosis, the median age reported was 67 years [22]. Earlier studies have demonstrated that the severity of bacteraemia increases with age, necessitating quicker identification of organisms and prompt empirical antibiotic treatment [23].
Our study utilized clinical criteria at admission to identify patients with true bacteraemia. We found that fever within 72 h of hospitalization was significantly higher among patients diagnosed with true bacteraemia than those with transient bacteraemia. A previous study reported that fever was present in 80% of patients who required antibiotic treatment for Actinomyces bacteraemia [19]. Fever accompanied by systemic manifestations prompts providers to suspect sepsis and initiate empiric antibiotic treatments, which help reduce the incidence of secondary adverse outcomes [19,23, 24].
Disruption of mucosa enables entry of Actinomyces to gain access to deeper tissues via trauma, surgical procedures or foreign bodies. Actinomycosis is characterized by a dense lesion that slowly spreads ignoring tissue planes. Over time, fluctuation and suppuration develop. Depending on location over time, sinus tracts can extend from the abscess to the skin or adjacent organs.
In our study, chronic skin ulcers and abscesses were significantly higher in patients with true bacteraemia. In a previous study, skin and soft tissue infection was seen in 30% of cases of true bacteraemia [17]. In another study, 8.8% of cases had skin and soft tissue involvement [21].
The most common species among true bacteraemia was A. meyeri, and among the transient bacteraemia was A. odontolyticus, with a transient versus true bacteraemia ratio of 1:8 and 1:0.32, respectively.
In another study among invasive disease in cancer patients, A. odontolyticus was most frequently isolated (35.4%), followed by A. meyeri in 20 (20.8%) and A. naeslundii in 20 (20.8%). In contrast, among colonizer, A. odontolyticus (46.2%) was the most frequently isolated species [25]. Based on our study, A. meyeri may exhibit higher invasiveness potential, which could guide clinicians to consider aggressive therapeutic measures earlier.
The strength of our study included a multicentre study design. The main limitation of our study was that the data were collected by retrospective chart review. Despite this limitation, we made every effort to ensure the accuracy and reliability of our findings. Our study still provides valuable insights and highlights the need for further research. Second, the study included patients from the two hospitals in Southeast Michigan, so the findings may not be generalizable.
Conclusion
Predictors of true Actinomyces bacteraemia included older age, fever within 72 h of admission, presence of abscess and chronic skin disease. Better awareness and involvement of infectious disease specialists is recommended in determining the clinical significance of transient Actinomyces bacteraemia and can help implement antibiotic stewardship to improve appropriate antibiotic use and patient safety and improve outcomes. Actinomyces species exhibit varying degrees of invasiveness, with A. meyeri potentially showing higher invasive potential in our study, which could guide clinicians to consider aggressive therapeutic measures earlier. Further research will help to identify the true importance of these isolates.
Abbreviations
- CHF
congestive heart failure
- COPD
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- DM
diabetes mellitus
- MALDI-TOF
matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight
- MI
myocardial infarction
Footnotes
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Ethical statement: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRBNET number RMIJ20210317). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants' legal guardians/next of kin because the research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects.
Contributor Information
Mamta Sharma, Email: msharma4@hfhs.org.
Susan Szpunar, Email: sszpunar2@hfhs.org.
Farah Tanveer, Email: DrFarahTanveer@hotmail.com.
Jonathan Arcobello, Email: jarcobello@llu.edu.
Sanjay Revankar, Email: srevanker@medwayne.edu.
Ashish Bhargava, Email: abharga1@hfhs.org.
References
- 1.Wong VK, Turmezei TD, Weston VC. Actinomycosis. BMJ. 2011;343:d6099. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bennhoff DF. Actinomycosis: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations and a review of 32 cases. Laryngoscope. 1984;94:1198–1217. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198409000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gliga S, Devaux M, Gosset Woimant M, Mompoint D, Perronne C, et al. Actinomyces graevenitzii pulmonary abscess mimicking tuberculosis in a healthy young man. Can Respir J. 2014;21:e75–e77. doi: 10.1155/2014/841480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sweis RF, Propes MJ, Hyjek E. Actinomyces-induced inflammatory pseudotumor of the lymph node mimicking scrofula. Ann Intern Med . 2011;155:66–67. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jánoskuti L, Lengyel M, Fenyvesi T. Cardiac actinomycosis in a patient presenting with acute cardiac tamponade and a mass mimicking pericardial tumour. Heart. 2004;90:e27. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.031633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kalioras V, Thanos L, Mylona S, Pomoni M, Batakis N. Scalp actinomycosis mimicking soft tissue mass. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:117–118. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/61817095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pulverer G, Schütt-Gerowitt H, Schaal KP. Human cervicofacial actinomycoses: microbiological data for 1997 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:490–497. doi: 10.1086/376621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cone LA, Leung MM, Hirschberg J. Actinomyces odontolyticus bacteremia. Emerg Infect Dis . 2003;9:1629–1632. doi: 10.3201/eid0912.020646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hwang SS, Park SD, Jang IH, Uh Y, Yoon KJ, et al. Actinomyces graevenitzii bacteremia in a patient with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Anaerobe. 2011;17:87–89. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Apothéloz C, Regamey C. Disseminated infection due to Actinomyces meyeri: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:621–625. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.4.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Colmegna I, Rodriguez-Barradas M, Rauch R, Clarridge J, Young EJ. Disseminated Actinomyces meyeri infection resembling lung cancer with brain metastases. Am J Med Sci. 2003;326:152–155. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200309000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hagiya H, Ogawa H, Takahashi Y, Kimura K, Hasegawa K, et al. Actinomyces turicensis bacteremia secondary to pyometra. Intern Med. 2015;54:2775–2777. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.4637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brown ML, Drinkwater CJ. Hematogenous infection of total hip arthroplasty with Actinomyces following a noninvasive dental procedure. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e1086–9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120621-27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nielsen HL. First report of Actinomyces europaeus bacteraemia result from a breast abscess in a 53-year-old man. New Microbes and New Infections . 2015;7:21–22. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Seo JY, Yeom JS, Ko KS. Actinomyces cardiffensis septicemia: a case report. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73:86–88. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Valour F, Sénéchal A, Dupieux C, Karsenty J, Lustig S, et al. Actinomycosis: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management. Infect Drug Resist. 2014;7:183–197. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S39601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jeffery-Smith A, Nic-Fhogartaigh C, Millar M. Is the presence of Actinomyces spp. in blood culture always significant? J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1137–1139. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03074-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Datta S, Soliman M, Laguio M. Actinomyces in blood: is it clinically significant or insignificant? Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4:S554. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ali M, Razok A, Ziglam H. A 5-year retrospective study of Actinomyces odontolyticus bacteremia in the state of Qatar, case series. Ann Med Surg. 2022;76:103583. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cone LA, Leung MM, Hirschberg J. Actinomyces odontolyticus bacteremia. Emerg Infect Dis . 2003;9:1629–1632. doi: 10.3201/eid0912.020646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mollett G, Marek A. Investigation of Actinomyces spp. bacteraemia and associated 1 year mortality in NHS greater glasgow and clyde. Clin Infect Pract. 2021;12:100084. doi: 10.1016/j.clinpr.2021.100084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang N, Zhou K, Gao X, Duan X, Yang S, et al. Clinical features of Actinomycosis in older adults: a 10-year experience of a single institute in Beijing, China. Cureus. 2024;16:e65734. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee CC, Wang JL, Lee CH, Hung YP, Hong MY, et al. Age-related trends in adults with community-onset bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e01050-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01050-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Strich JR, Heil EL, Masur H. Considerations for empiric antimicrobial therapy in sepsis and septic shock in an era of antimicrobial resistance. J Infect Dis. 2020;222:S119–S131. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.El-Atoum M, Gailor ME, Segal BH, Bonnewell JP, Almyroudis NG. Microbiology of Actinomyces species isolated from patients with invasive disease and contaminated samples in a comprehensive cancer center. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11:ofae580. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
