Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1978 Apr;88(4):761–780. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.4.761

Selection for Nursing Ability and Adult Weight in Mice

J Nagai 1, E J Eisen 1, J A B Emsley 1, A J McAllister 1
PMCID: PMC1213818  PMID: 17248818

Abstract

Three selection treatments were conducted for 12 generations in each of two base populations (P and Q): (1) increased nursing ability of the mother (n12), as measured by mean 12-day weight of eight young within a crossfostering set (MP and MQ lines), (2) increased adult (42-day) body weight of the offspring (w42) (WP and W Q lines), and (3) performance combining the two traits (n12 and w42) into a selection index (BP and BQ lines). Lines C P and CQ were maintained as unselected controls in each population. In each line-generation subclass, 92 single-pair matings were made and the offspring assigned to balanced crossfostering sets of four dams each. Regression coefficients of mean performance (in grams) on generations were 0.080 ±0.029 and 0.054 ± 0.031 for n12 in MP and MQ, and 0.680 ± 0.039 and 0.868 ± 0.051 for w42 in WP and WQ, respectively. The BP and BQ lines showed genetic gains in n12 (0.090 and 0.053, respectively) and w42 (0.576 and 0.696) intermediate between the performance of MP and WP, and MQ and WQ, respectively, except for n12 of BQ. Realized heritabilities for n12 were 0.16 ± 0.05 and 0.11 ± 0.06 and those for w42 were 0.40 ± 0.02 and 0.43 ± 0.03 for P and Q, respectively. The realized genetic correlations between n12 and w42 were 0.70 ± 0.07 and 0.73 ± 0.08 in P and Q, respectively. The ratios of the predicted to observed responses in MP, BP and BQ were 0.99, 1.03 and 0.89, respectively. However, the predicted and observed responses differed in M Q, WP and WQ; the ratios were 1.29, 0.65 and 0.65, respectively. The observed combined responses for n12 and w42 in the index lines (BP and BQ) were smaller than the optimum expected from index selection. A possible cause was that the estimated genetic correlations (0.22 ± 0.16 and -0.17 ± 0.16 for BP and B Q, respectively) and heritabilities (0.39 ± 0.03 and 0.28 ± 0.02, respectively) for w42 that were used to construct the selection index were smaller than the respective realized parameters.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Eisen E. J., Legates J. E., Robison O. W. Selection for 12-day litter weight in mice. Genetics. 1970 Mar-Apr;64(3):511–532. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hazel L N. The Genetic Basis for Constructing Selection Indexes. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):476–490. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hill W. G. Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. II. Selection in one direction. Biometrics. 1972 Sep;28(3):767–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nagai J., Bakker H., Eisen E. J. Genetic analysis of nurse dams selected for six-week body weight or postweaning gain in mice. Can J Genet Cytol. 1976 Dec;18(4):611–623. doi: 10.1139/g76-074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nagai J. Preweaning weight as a measure of milk production in mice. Can J Genet Cytol. 1971 Jun;13(2):354–361. doi: 10.1139/g71-054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rutledge J. J., Robison O. W., Eisen E. J., Legates J. E. Dynamics of genetic and maternal effects in mice. J Anim Sci. 1972 Nov;35(5):911–918. doi: 10.2527/jas1972.355911x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. White J. M. Milk yield in lines of mice selected for growth or maternal ability. Can J Genet Cytol. 1975 Jun;17(2):263–268. doi: 10.1139/g75-034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Young C. W., Legates J. E., Farthing B. R. Prenatal and postnatal influences on growth, prolificacy and maternal performance in mice. Genetics. 1965 Sep;52(3):553–561. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.3.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Young C. W., Legates J. E. Genetic, phenotypic, and maternal interrelationships of growth in mice. Genetics. 1965 Sep;52(3):563–576. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.3.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. el-Oksh H. A., Sutherland T. M., Williams J. S. Prenatal and postnatal maternal influence on growth in mice. Genetics. 1967 Sep;57(1):79–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/57.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES