Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1978 Sep;90(1):193–205. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.1.193

Genetic and Physiological Adaptation of the Copepod EURYTEMORA AFFINIS to Seasonal Temperatures

Brian P Bradley 1
PMCID: PMC1213876  PMID: 17248856

Abstract

Evidence of significant additive genetic (genic) variance in temperature tolerance of the copepod Eurytemora affinis was derived from several sources. Differences were observed between average tolerances of progeny of animals exposed and not exposed to heat shock in a power plant. Genic variance was estimated using offspring-parent regressions, full-sib, and half-sib covariances, with quite consistent results. Expressed genic variance between male progeny was always higher than that among female progeny.—The pairs of estimates obtained were as follows: female heritabilities first, 0.40 ± 0.09 and 0.84 ± 0.35 (half-sibs); 0.20 ± 0.09 and 0.79 ± 0.24 (full-sibs); 0.11 ± 0.10 and 0.89 ± 0.45 (full-sibs); 0.28 ± 0.18 and 0.78 ± 0.29 (full-sibs); 0.11 ± 0.44 and 0.72 ± 0.26 (offspring-parent regression). There was no evidence of either nonadditive genetic variance or common environmental (maternal and brood) effects, implying that the genetic variance was mostly additive and was not maintained because of heterozygous advantage.—The presence of so much genetic variance is surprising in view of the high physiological adaptation found earlier, especially in females.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (778.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Enfield F. D., Hartung N., Hefeneider S. H. Sex differences in gene expression for pupa weight in long term selected lines of Tribolium. Can J Genet Cytol. 1975 Mar;17(1):9–13. doi: 10.1139/g75-002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fatt H. V., Dougherty E. C. Genetic Control of Differential Heat Tolerance in Two Strains of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1963 Jul 19;141(3577):266–267. doi: 10.1126/science.141.3577.266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gibson J. B., Bradley B. P. Stabilising selection in constant and fluctuating environments. Heredity (Edinb) 1974 Dec;33(3):293–302. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1974.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McDonald J. F., Ayala F. J. Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity. Nature. 1974 Aug 16;250(467):572–574. doi: 10.1038/250572a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Minawa A., Birley A. J. Genetical and environmental diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1975 Jun 26;255(5511):702–704. doi: 10.1038/255702a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES