Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1978 Nov;90(3):629–644. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.3.629

Dynamics of Correlated Genetic Systems. IV. Multilocus Effects of Ethanol Stress Environments

D R Cavener 1, M T Clegg 1
PMCID: PMC1213909  PMID: 103779

Abstract

Four replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster, two reared on medium supplemented with ethanol and two reared on standard medium, were electrophoretically monitored for 28 generations. During the first 12 generations, allelic, genotypic and gametic frequencies were determined for eight polymorphic enzymes: GOT, α-GPDH, MDH, ADH, TO, E6, Ec and ODH. Samples from generation 18 and 28 were electrophoretically typed for ADH and α-GPDH. In addition, samples from generation 27 were analyzed for the presence of inversion heterozygous.—The experimental results showed rapid gene-frequency divergence between control and treatment populations at the Adh locus in a direction consistent with the activity hierarchy of Adh genotypes. Gene-frequency divergence between control and treatment populations also occurred at the α-Gpdh locus, although the agreement among replicates appeared to have broken down by generation 28. No differential gene-frequency change occurred at any of the six remaining marker loci. Furthermore, values of linkage disequilibria among all linked pairs of genes were initially small and remained small throughout the course of the experiment. Taking these facts into account, it is argued that the gene-frequency response observed at ADH is most probably caused by selection at the Adh locus. The gene frequency response at α-Gpdh can also be be accounted for in terms of the effect of ethanol on energy metabolism, although other explanations cannot be excluded.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (853.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Tracey M. L., Mourão C. A., Pérez-Salas S. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics. 1972 Jan;70(1):113–139. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bijlsma-Meeles E., Van Delden W. Intra- and interpopulation selection concerning the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1974 Feb 8;247(5440):369–371. doi: 10.1038/247369a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briscoe D. A., Robertson A., Malpica J. M. Dominance at Adh locus in response of adult Drosophila melanogaster to environmental alcohol. Nature. 1975 May 8;255(5504):148–149. doi: 10.1038/255148a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Day T. H., Hillier P. C., Clarke B. Properties of genetically polymorphic isozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Genet. 1974 Feb;11(2):141–153. doi: 10.1007/BF00485770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morgan P. Selection acting directly on an enzyme polymorphism. Heredity (Edinb) 1975 Feb;34(1):124–127. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1975.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Starmer W. T., Heed W. B., Rockwood-Sluss E. S. Extension of longevity in Drosophila mojavensis by environmental ethanol: differences between subraces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jan;74(1):387–391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. van Delden W., Kamping A., van Dijk H. Selection at the alcoholdehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia. 1975 Apr 15;31(4):418–420. doi: 10.1007/BF02026351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES