Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1979 Jan;91(1):95–103. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.1.95

Genetic Organization in CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS: Fine-Structure Analysis of the unc-22 Gene

D G Moerman 1, D L Baillie 1
PMCID: PMC1213933  PMID: 17248882

Abstract

Fine-structure analysis of the unc-22 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans has revealed a number of sites that are separable by recombination. Eight new ethyl methanesulfonate-induced recessive mutations of the unc-22 gene have been isolated. Using these new alleles, as well as e66, a number of separable sites have been identified and positioned relative to one another. The map distances obtained are found to be comparable to those associated with intragenic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster, indicating that genetic fine-structure analysis is feasible in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evidence of possible gene conversion is presented. A preliminary estimate of the unc-22 gene size is 2.4 x 10-2 map units.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (510.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chovnick A., Ballantyne G. H., Holm D. G. Studies on gene conversion and its relationship to linked exchange in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1971 Oct;69(2):179–209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/69.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chovnick A., Gelbart W., McCarron M., Osmond B. Organization of the rosy locus in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for a control element adjacent to the xanthine dehydrogenase structural element. Genetics. 1976 Oct;84(2):233–255. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.2.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deppe U., Schierenberg E., Cole T., Krieg C., Schmitt D., Yoder B., von Ehrenstein G. Cell lineages of the embryo of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):376–380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duck P., Chovnick A. Resolution of an equivocal genetic element in Drosophila melanogaster: organization of the maroon-like locus. Genetics. 1975 Mar;79(3):459–466. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.3.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fogel S., Mortimer R. K. Informational transfer in meiotic gene conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Jan;62(1):96–103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.1.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gelbart W., McCarron M., Chovnick A. Extension of the limits of the XDH structural element in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1976 Oct;84(2):211–232. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.2.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herman R. K. Crossover suppressors and balanced recessive lethals in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1978 Jan;88(1):49–65. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. JUDD B. H. THE STRUCTURE OF INTRALOCUS DUPLICATION AND DEFICIENCY CHROMOSOMES PRODUCED BY RECOMBINATION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER, WITH EVIDENCE FOR POLARIZED PAIRING. Genetics. 1964 Feb;49:253–265. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.2.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitchell M. B. ABERRANT RECOMBINATION OF PYRIDOXINE MUTANTS OF Neurospora. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Apr 15;41(4):215–220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.4.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sulston J. E., Brenner S. The DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):95–104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES