Abstract
The founder principle has been used to explain many instances of rapid speciation. Advances from theoretical population genetics are incorporated into Mayr's original founder-effect genetic-revolution model to yield a newer model called the genetic transilience. The basic theoretical edifice lies upon the fact that founder event can sometimes lead to an accumulation of inbreeding and an induction of gametic disequilibrium. This, in turn, causes alleles to be selected more for their homozygous fitness effects and for their effects on a more stable genetic background. Selection occurring in multi-locus systems controlling integrated developmental, physiological, behavioral, etc., traits is particularly sensitive to these founder effects. If sufficient genetic variability exists in the founder population, such multilocus genetic systems can respond to drift and the altered selective forces by undergoing a rapid shift to a new adaptive peak known as the genetic transilience. A genetic transilience is, therefore, most likely to occur when the founder event causes a rapid accumulation of inbreeding without a severe reduction in genetic variability. The implications of this model are then examined for three aspects of the founder-effect genetic-transilience model: the attributes of the ancestral population, the nature of the sampling process used to generate the founders and the attributes of the founder population. The model is used to explain several features of the evolution of the Hawaiian Drosophila, and experimental designs are outlined to test the major predictions of the theory. Hence, this theory of speciation can be tested in the laboratory, using systems and techniques that already exist—a rare attribute of most models of speciation.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Annest J. L., Templeton A. R. Genetic Recombination and Clonal Selection in DROSOPHILA MERCATORUM. Genetics. 1978 May;89(1):193–210. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.1.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Averhoff W. W., Richardson R. H. Pheromonal control of mating patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1974 Sep;4(3):207–225. doi: 10.1007/BF01074155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill W. G. Disequilibrium among several linked neutral genes in finite population. II. Variances and covariances of disequilibria. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Oct;6(2):184–198. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson G. B. Enzyme polymorphism and metabolism. Science. 1974 Apr 5;184(4132):28–37. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4132.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maruyama T. Rate of decrease of genetic variability in a two-dimensional continuous population of finite size. Genetics. 1972 Apr;70(4):639–651. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powell J. R., Morton L. Inbreeding and mating patterns in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav Genet. 1979 Sep;9(5):425–429. doi: 10.1007/BF01066981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rothman E. D., Sing C. F., Templeton A. R. A model for analysis of population structure. Genetics. 1974 Nov;78(3):943–960. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.3.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sene F. M., Carson H. L. Genetic variation in Hawaiian Drosophila. IV. Allozymic similarity between D. silvestris and D. heteroneura from the island of Hawaii. Genetics. 1977 May;86(1):187–198. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sturtevant A H, Novitski E. The Homologies of the Chromosome Elements in the Genus Drosophila. Genetics. 1941 Sep;26(5):517–541. doi: 10.1093/genetics/26.5.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sved J. A. The stability of linked systems of loci with a small population size. Genetics. 1968 Aug;59(4):543–563. doi: 10.1093/genetics/59.4.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]