Abstract
Different electrophoretic alleles of amylase show associations with particular chromosome 3 inversions in D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Relative adult amylase activities were compared in 37, 37 and 10 strains of D. pseudoobscura, D. persimilis and D. miranda, respectively. Strains carrying the same electrophoretic allele were compared by crossing these lines individually to a reference strain carrying a different electrophoretic mobility allele. This procedure allows comparisons among species, inversions, electromorphs and strains for genetic variation in amylase activity. F2 analysis established that the activity variation co-segregates with the structural amylase locus. This type of variation could be due to either structural gene differences or differences in closely linked, cis-acting regulatory regions. Variation has been detected among and within electrophoretic mobility classes. Moreover, this variation is clearly nonrandom and reveals more of the genetic structure associated with the chromosomal inversion phylogeny of D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.—Some of the findings are: (1) Similar electromorphs in D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis usually show different activities. These species show nearly complete differentiation of amylase alleles, based on activities. (2) D. persimilis has the broadest range of variation in amylase activity, about four-fold between the highest and lowest alleles. D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda are also polymorphic for activity, but have more constrained ranges of variation. D. miranda alleles show on the average about four times the activity of D. pseudoobscura alleles. (3) Some association of electrophoretic mobility and activity has been found. Alleles 1.09 of D. persimilis, as well as 1.43 and 1.55 of D. miranda, have relatively high activity. It may be that these high activity alleles are part of an adaptation to cooler habitats. (4) Within electrophoretic classes, associations of activities with inversions have been found. These are especially strong in D. persimilis. The 1.00 alleles in the ST, KL, MD and WT inversions, the 0.92 allele in the ST and MD inversions and the 1.09 allele in the WT and KL inversions have levels of activities that depend upon the arrangement in which they are located. These results demonstrate that suppression of recombination in inversion heterokaryotypes can result in extensive genic divergence between inversions.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Mukai T., Mettler L. E., Chigusa S. I. Linkage disequilibrium in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 May;68(5):1065–1069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.5.1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nei M., Li W. H. Probability of identical monomorphism in related species. Genet Res. 1975 Aug;26(1):31–43. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300015822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powell J. R. Apparent selection of enzyme alleles in laboratory populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 1973 Nov;75(3):557–570. doi: 10.1093/genetics/75.3.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prakash S., Lewontin R. C. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. 3. Direct evidence of coadaptation in gene arrangements of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Feb;59(2):398–405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh R. S., Lewontin R. C., Felton A. A. Genetic heterogeneity within electrophoretic "alleles" of xanthine dehydrogenase in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1976 Nov;84(3):609–629. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zouros E. Genic versus chromosomal variation in natural populations of Drosophila subobscura. Genetics. 1974 Dec;78(4):1223–1244. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.4.1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]