Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2025 May 20;81(Pt 6):534–537. doi: 10.1107/S2056989025004293

Bis[1,2-bis­(3,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)ethyl­ene-1,2-di­thiol­ato(1−)]nickel(II)

Titir Das Gupta a, Jackson Guite a, LiWen Hirt a, Xiaodong Zhang a, James P Donahue a,*
Editor: J Reibenspiesb
PMCID: PMC12142419  PMID: 40487704

Square-planar bis­[1,2-bis­(3,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)ethyl­ene-1,2-di­thiol­ato(1–)]nickel(II) crystallizes on an inversion center in monoclinic P21/c in a packing arrangement defined by a dense network of inter­molecular methyl C—H→πarene hydrogen bonds.

Keywords: crystal structure, di­thiol­ene, nickel, electron-donating, C—H→πarene hydrogen bonds

Abstract

The title compound, [Ni(C18H18S2)2], 1, crystallizes upon an inversion center in monoclinic P21/c with intra­ligand C—S and C—Cchelate bond lengths that are indicative of the radical monoanionic redox level for the di­thiol­ene ligand. The arene rings are canted at angles of 43.54 (4) and 71.36 (3)° with respect to the NiS4 plane. Mol­ecules of 1 form columnar stacks along the a axis of the cell with a ∼59° angle between the mol­ecular plane and the stacking axis. Adjacent stacks alternate in the directionality of their cant relative to the stacking axis such that a 37.2° angle is defined by the core NiS4 planes of mol­ecules from adjoining columns. Inter­molecular inter­actions are governed by methyl C—H→πarene hydrogen bonds, with each mol­ecule enjoying four such inter­actions as acceptor and providing four such inter­actions as donor.

1. Chemical context

First synthesized in the middle 1960s, transition-metal di­thiol­ene complexes elicited inter­est initially because their electronic structures did not conform to classical descriptive formalisms and led to the recognition that complexes with redox-active ligands define a category of coordination compounds that distinctively differ from those with metal-based frontier MOs (Eisenberg & Gray, 2011). For di­thiol­ene complexes of the Group 10 metals particularly, their potential as novel, engineered materials for a broad range of applications has motivated steady effort aimed at the development of new synthetic methods and at characterization of their optical, electronic, and magnetic properties. Examples of the important behavior manifested by this compound class include the reversible bleaching of nickel di­thiol­ene dyes under intense radiation (Mueller-Westerhoff et al., 1991), superconductivity in mol­ecular Group 10 bis­(di­thiol­ene) complexes (Kato, 2004), sensing of organophosphate toxins by platinum di­thiol­ene 1,2-bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)ethane complexes (Van Houten et al., 1998), ferromagnetism (Robertson & Cronin, 2002; Faulmann & Cassoux, 2004), and catalytic H2-evolution by nickel bis­(di­thiol­ene) complexes under photolysis (Zarkadoulas et al., 2016). Because the redox, electronic, and optical properties that support many of these applications are directly and rationally influenced by the chemical nature of the di­thiol­ene substituents, the development and characterization of new ligand derivatives and their complexes with Group 10 metals is of continuing inter­est. In this report, we detail the synthesis and crystal structure of nickel bis­(3,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)di­thiol­ene, a coordination compound and a di­thiol­ene ligand variant that have not previously been reported.1.

2. Structural commentary

Bis[1,2-bis­(3,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)ethyl­ene-1,2-di­thiol­ato(1−)]nickel(II), 1, is prepared in 38% yield using the phospho­rus sulfide-benzil/benzoin protocol first disclosed by Schrauzer (Schrauzer & Mayweg, 1965). The separation of 1 from the solution as a microcrystalline precipitate is enabled by its hydro­carbon-rich periphery, its centrosymmetry and the polar, mixed aqueous-organic medium in which it forms. Its purity at this point is sufficient for most further purposes, but it is readily tractable to preparative-scale recrystallization by vapor diffusion methods.

The NiS4 inter­ior of 1 is rigorously planar, a feature necessitated by the occurrence of the mol­ecule upon a crystallographic inversion center (Fig. 1). The placement of the Ni2+ ion upon an inversion center has the additional consequence that only half of the coordination complex is unique. The angles at which the arene substituents join the C2S2Ni chelate ring are 43.54 (4) and 71.36 (3)°. The 1.7063 (8) Å S—Cave and 1.393 (2) C—Cchelate bond lengths in 1 are similar to the 1.714 (1) and 1.365 (9) Å observed for the corresponding bonds in Me2C2S.S in [Ni(S2C2Me2)2] (Fig. 2; Lim et al., 2001). This fact, in conjunction with the observation that these inter­atomic distances lie between those for the C—S and C—Cchelate bonds in [Ni(S2C2Me2)2]2– (Lim et al., 2001) and [Ni((S=C)2(NMeCH2)2)2]2+ (Bigoli, et al., 2001), in which the ligand redox levels are fully reduced ene-1,2-di­thiol­ate and fully oxidized α-di­thione, respectively, affirms a radical monoanionic description of the ligands in 1 (cf. Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Displacement ellipsoid plot of 1 at the 50% probability level with atom labeling. Symmetry-related atoms other than S1A and S2A are not labeled. Symmetry code: (A) −x, 2 − y, 1 − z.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Redox levels of the di­thiol­ene ligand shown with the S—C and C—C intra-ligand bond lengths that are typical for each redox state. The S—C and C—C bond lengths decrease and increase, respectively, as the redox series is traversed from ene-1,2-di­thiol­ate(2–) (a) to α-di­thione (c).

3. Supra­molecular features

The packing arrangement places mol­ecules of 1 into columnar stacks along the a-axis direction of the cell with aryl rings of neighboring mol­ecules forming both parallel planar and near orthogonal inter­actions (Fig. 3). When adjacent columns of mol­ecules are viewed from the perspective of the edge of the NiS4 plane (Fig. 4), an alternation is evident in the disposition angle of the mol­ecular plane with respect to the stacking axis. The centermost stack in Fig. 4 reveals mol­ecules whose planar core is rotated clockwise approximately 31° from orthogonality to the stacking axis, while the adjoining columns of 1 have the mol­ecular plane inclined in the opposite direction by an equal magnitude. Regardless of the directionality of the tilt, the mol­ecular planes form an angle of about 59° with the a axis. From the vantage point presented in Fig. 4, mol­ecules from neighboring stacks are canted at a 37.2° angle relative to one another such that a herringbone-like motif to the packing arrangement is created. A perspective view down the c axis of the cell again shows a zigzag pattern formed as rows of 1 related by simple translation along b project onto other rows of 1 that are canted in the other direction as they are also replicated by translation along b (Fig. 5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

View along the a axis of the unit cell, revealing columnar stacks of 1. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% level, and all H atoms are omitted for clarity.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A ‘side-on’ perspective of the columnar stacks of 1 illustrating the alternating orientation of the mol­ecular plane relative to the stacking axis. The view is approximately along the direction of the ac face diagonal of the cell. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% level, and all H atoms are omitted for clarity.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

View of the mol­ecular packing for 1 along the c axis of the unit cell. A sawtoothed appearance to the packing motif is again evident but with more acute angle in the pattern. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% level, and all H atoms are omitted for clarity.

Inter­molecular inter­actions between stacks are governed by methyl C—H→πarene non-classical hydrogen bonds rather than by aliphatic dispersion forces. The distance between the C2–C7 ring centroid and H17C of an adjoining mol­ecule is 2.97 Å, while H18B from a different neighboring mol­ecule is positioned 2.87 Å from the C11–C16 ring centroid. This pattern is replicated on the mol­ecule’s other side such that each mol­ecule functions as an acceptor of four such C—H→πarene hydrogen bonds, one with each 3,5-di­methyl­phenyl ring (Fig. 6). The heavy red dashed lines that depict these inter­actions evoke a windmill-like symmetry in Fig. 6. Additionally, both H17C and H18B from each end of 1 serve as donors of C—H→πarene hydrogen bonds to adjacent mol­ecules, providing each mol­ecule of 1 with an additional four C—H→πarene hydrogen bonds as C—H donor. While such inter­actions are individually weak with an inter­action strength in the range of 1.5–2.5 kcal mol−1 (Nishio, 2012), their collective effect appears to be decisive in guiding the inter­leaved arrangement of 3,5-di­methyl­phenyl rings.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Packing arrangement of 1 in rows along the b axis (left-to-right) as viewed down the a axis of the cell. The four C–H → πarene inter­actions in which the mol­ecule with the Ni1 label serves as acceptor are illustrated with heavy dashed red lines. Displacement ellipsoids are presented at the 50% level.

4. Database survey

The bis­(3,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)di­thiol­ene ligand does not appear in any structurally characterized coordination compound of the transition metals or any other element (CSD, Version 2024.3; Groom et al., 2016), nor does any report of its use occur in other information databases. The set of structurally characterized homoleptic nickel bis­(di­thiol­ene) complexes with aryl-type substituents, [Ni(S2C2Ar2)2], to which 1 is now joined includes those where Ar = Ph (Megnamisi-Belombe & Nuber, 1989; Kuramoto & Asao, 1990; Miao et al., 2011), Me-4-C6H4 (Miao et al., 2011), tBu-4-C6H4 (Das Gupta et al., 2023), Cl-4-C6H4 (Koehne et al., 2022), MeO-4-C6H4 (Arumugam et al., 2007), and 3,5-(MeO)2-4-nBuO-C6H2 (Nakazumi et al., 1992). Among these complexes, the largest twist angle between an aryl ring substituent and the NiS4C4 plane is 65.77° in the monoclinic polymorph of [Ni(S2C2Ph2)2] (Miao et al., 2011), a value that is appreciably less than the 71.36 (3)° twist angle in 1. While C—H→πarene hydrogen-bond inter­actions are very apparent in this P21/n form of [Ni(S2C2Ph2)2], close approach of H atoms to the ring centroids of neighboring mol­ecules easily occurs with lessened rotation of the aryl substituent from the planar core.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

Phospho­rus sulfide (P4S10, 0.379 g, 0.853 mmol) and 1,2-bis­(3,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)ethane-1,2-dione (0.353 g, 1.32 mmol) were dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (50 ml) and refluxed under a N2 atmosphere for 3.5 h. The resulting mixture was cooled to ambient temperature, filtered to remove unreacted solids, transferred to a solution of [Ni(OH2)6]Cl2 (0.129 g, 0.541 mmol) in deionized H2O (5 ml) and brought to reflux again for 3 h under N2. Upon cooling, the reaction mixture deposited crude 1 as a dark microcrystalline solid, which was collected by vacuum filtration, washed in succession with portions of deionized H2O, EtOH, and Et2O and then dried overnight under vacuum. Yield: 0.135 g, 0.206 mmol, 38%. Diffraction quality, prism-shaped black crystals were grown by the diffusion of MeOH vapor into a benzene solution. 1H NMR (δ, p.p.m. in CDCl3): 7.00 (s, 3 H, ortho and para aromatic C—H), 2.25 (s, 24 H, –CH3). 13C NMR (δ, p.p.m. in CDCl3): 181.9, 141.3, 137.8, 130.6, 126.9, 21.3. UV-vis [CH2Cl2, λmax, nm (ɛM, M−1·cm−1)]: 270 (11800), 320 (15000), 605 (670), 875 (10200). Cyclic voltammetry (CH2Cl2, [nBu4N][PF6] supporting electrolyte, Cp2Fe+/Cp2Fe as reference): 1 – e → [1]+, +0.611 V; 1 + e → [1], −0.509 V; [1] – e → [1]2–, −1.323 V. Analysis calculated for C36H36S4Ni: C, 65.95; H, 5.53; S, 19.56. Found: C, 65.86; H, 5.49; S, 19.49.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. Hydrogen atoms were added in calculated positions and refined with isotropic displacement parameters that were approximately 1.2 times (for aromatic C—H) or 1.5 times (for –CH3) those of the carbon atoms to which they were attached. The C—H distances assumed were 0.95 and 0.98 Å for the aromatic C—H and –CH3 types of hydrogen atoms, respectively. Rotation around the CH3—Caromatic bonds was used to identify the positional variant that best modeled the experimental electron-density map.

Table 1. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Ni(C18H18S2)2]
M r 655.60
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 8.4446 (2), 14.0911 (2), 13.5880 (2)
β (°) 96.133 (1)
V3) 1607.63 (5)
Z 2
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 3.47
Crystal size (mm) 0.14 × 0.14 × 0.04
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 QUEST PHOTON 3 diffractometer
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
Tmin, Tmax 0.77, 0.88
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 33748, 3139, 2827
R int 0.077
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.618
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.024, 0.066, 1.08
No. of reflections 3139
No. of parameters 191
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.29, −0.30

Computer programs: APEX4 and SAINT (Bruker, 2021), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL2018/1 (Sheldrick, 2015b) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025004293/jy2060sup1.cif

e-81-00534-sup1.cif (1,001KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025004293/jy2060Isup2.hkl

e-81-00534-Isup2.hkl (250.8KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 2450503

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Bis[1,2-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethylene-1,2-dithiolato(1-)]nickel(II). Crystal data

[Ni(C18H18S2)2] F(000) = 688
Mr = 655.60 Dx = 1.354 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 8.4446 (2) Å Cell parameters from 9778 reflections
b = 14.0911 (2) Å θ = 6.3–72.3°
c = 13.5880 (2) Å µ = 3.47 mm1
β = 96.133 (1)° T = 150 K
V = 1607.63 (5) Å3 Prism, black
Z = 2 0.14 × 0.14 × 0.04 mm

Bis[1,2-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethylene-1,2-dithiolato(1-)]nickel(II). Data collection

Bruker D8 QUEST PHOTON 3 diffractometer 3139 independent reflections
Radiation source: INCOATEC IµS micro—-focus source 2827 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromator Rint = 0.077
Detector resolution: 7.3910 pixels mm-1 θmax = 72.4°, θmin = 5.3°
φ and ω scans h = −10→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) k = −17→17
Tmin = 0.77, Tmax = 0.88 l = −16→16
33748 measured reflections

Bis[1,2-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethylene-1,2-dithiolato(1-)]nickel(II). Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.066 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0406P)2 + 0.231P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3139 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.002
191 parameters Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.30 e Å3

Bis[1,2-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethylene-1,2-dithiolato(1-)]nickel(II). Special details

Experimental. The diffraction data were obtained from 18 sets of frames, each of width 0.50 ° in ω or φ, collected with scan parameters determined by the "strategy" routine in APEX4. The scan time was 1.00 to 2.00 sec/frame.
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Bis[1,2-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethylene-1,2-dithiolato(1-)]nickel(II). Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ni1 0.000000 1.000000 0.500000 0.01729 (9)
S1 0.19671 (3) 0.95781 (2) 0.60078 (2) 0.02015 (9)
S2 −0.00937 (3) 0.86456 (2) 0.43113 (2) 0.01909 (9)
C1 0.23361 (13) 0.84300 (9) 0.57198 (9) 0.0178 (2)
C2 0.36518 (14) 0.79450 (8) 0.63520 (8) 0.0185 (2)
C3 0.52354 (14) 0.81955 (9) 0.62757 (9) 0.0204 (2)
H3 0.547341 0.869239 0.584243 0.025*
C4 0.64722 (14) 0.77144 (10) 0.68374 (9) 0.0227 (2)
C5 0.60798 (14) 0.70147 (9) 0.74937 (9) 0.0220 (2)
H5 0.691341 0.669344 0.788443 0.026*
C6 0.45082 (14) 0.67694 (9) 0.75972 (9) 0.0205 (2)
C7 0.32915 (14) 0.72416 (9) 0.70087 (9) 0.0198 (2)
H7 0.221118 0.707946 0.705910 0.024*
C8 0.81906 (16) 0.79350 (13) 0.67185 (11) 0.0347 (3)
H8A 0.884086 0.784314 0.735298 0.052*
H8B 0.828065 0.859488 0.650366 0.052*
H8C 0.856592 0.751012 0.622164 0.052*
C9 0.41374 (16) 0.60121 (10) 0.83200 (10) 0.0267 (3)
H9A 0.299904 0.602821 0.840280 0.040*
H9B 0.475912 0.612633 0.896001 0.040*
H9C 0.441270 0.538868 0.806746 0.040*
C10 0.14043 (13) 0.79976 (8) 0.49382 (8) 0.0175 (2)
C11 0.16772 (14) 0.70341 (9) 0.45561 (9) 0.0194 (2)
C12 0.32241 (15) 0.67305 (9) 0.44488 (9) 0.0209 (2)
H12 0.409948 0.712794 0.466938 0.025*
C13 0.35040 (16) 0.58592 (9) 0.40260 (9) 0.0235 (2)
C14 0.22139 (17) 0.52790 (9) 0.37169 (9) 0.0274 (3)
H14 0.239969 0.467764 0.343480 0.033*
C15 0.06530 (17) 0.55596 (10) 0.38116 (10) 0.0265 (3)
C16 0.03943 (15) 0.64417 (9) 0.42290 (9) 0.0230 (2)
H16 −0.066303 0.664398 0.429274 0.028*
C17 0.51798 (17) 0.55730 (11) 0.38711 (11) 0.0317 (3)
H17A 0.524013 0.488055 0.381859 0.048*
H17B 0.591452 0.578953 0.443336 0.048*
H17C 0.547411 0.586274 0.326076 0.048*
C18 −0.0720 (2) 0.49193 (11) 0.34582 (13) 0.0379 (3)
H18A −0.157674 0.529667 0.310700 0.057*
H18B −0.111446 0.460583 0.402777 0.057*
H18C −0.036098 0.443897 0.300991 0.057*

Bis[1,2-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethylene-1,2-dithiolato(1-)]nickel(II). Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ni1 0.01736 (15) 0.01340 (15) 0.01985 (15) 0.00354 (9) −0.00388 (11) −0.00123 (10)
S1 0.02112 (15) 0.01491 (15) 0.02242 (15) 0.00378 (9) −0.00688 (11) −0.00326 (10)
S2 0.01952 (15) 0.01512 (14) 0.02085 (14) 0.00370 (9) −0.00609 (10) −0.00226 (10)
C1 0.0185 (5) 0.0148 (5) 0.0197 (5) 0.0022 (4) 0.0003 (4) 0.0000 (4)
C2 0.0192 (5) 0.0171 (5) 0.0180 (5) 0.0042 (4) −0.0035 (4) −0.0030 (4)
C3 0.0218 (6) 0.0206 (6) 0.0180 (5) 0.0002 (4) −0.0020 (4) −0.0008 (4)
C4 0.0188 (5) 0.0277 (6) 0.0207 (5) 0.0023 (5) −0.0025 (4) −0.0037 (5)
C5 0.0198 (6) 0.0252 (6) 0.0198 (5) 0.0083 (4) −0.0039 (4) −0.0017 (5)
C6 0.0246 (6) 0.0188 (6) 0.0175 (5) 0.0063 (4) −0.0001 (4) −0.0011 (4)
C7 0.0184 (5) 0.0184 (5) 0.0218 (5) 0.0027 (4) −0.0015 (4) −0.0013 (4)
C8 0.0205 (6) 0.0495 (9) 0.0334 (7) −0.0008 (6) −0.0012 (5) 0.0055 (7)
C9 0.0289 (6) 0.0257 (6) 0.0251 (6) 0.0056 (5) 0.0009 (5) 0.0052 (5)
C10 0.0167 (5) 0.0158 (5) 0.0194 (5) 0.0027 (4) −0.0008 (4) 0.0013 (4)
C11 0.0248 (6) 0.0155 (6) 0.0168 (5) 0.0036 (4) −0.0019 (4) 0.0006 (4)
C12 0.0245 (6) 0.0184 (6) 0.0191 (5) 0.0036 (4) −0.0008 (4) 0.0011 (4)
C13 0.0326 (6) 0.0203 (6) 0.0178 (5) 0.0074 (5) 0.0036 (5) 0.0027 (4)
C14 0.0437 (8) 0.0167 (6) 0.0218 (6) 0.0046 (5) 0.0030 (5) −0.0028 (5)
C15 0.0358 (7) 0.0192 (6) 0.0237 (6) −0.0023 (5) −0.0006 (5) −0.0029 (5)
C16 0.0252 (6) 0.0188 (6) 0.0243 (6) 0.0006 (4) −0.0008 (5) −0.0014 (5)
C17 0.0381 (7) 0.0276 (7) 0.0311 (7) 0.0123 (6) 0.0114 (6) 0.0006 (5)
C18 0.0447 (8) 0.0272 (7) 0.0411 (8) −0.0108 (6) 0.0004 (7) −0.0107 (6)

Bis[1,2-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethylene-1,2-dithiolato(1-)]nickel(II). Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Ni1—S1i 2.1218 (3) C9—H9A 0.9800
Ni1—S1 2.1218 (3) C9—H9B 0.9800
Ni1—S2i 2.1233 (3) C9—H9C 0.9800
Ni1—S2 2.1233 (3) C10—C11 1.4804 (16)
S1—C1 1.7010 (12) C11—C12 1.3969 (17)
S2—C10 1.7115 (11) C11—C16 1.4018 (18)
C1—C10 1.3927 (16) C12—C13 1.3865 (18)
C1—C2 1.4952 (15) C12—H12 0.9500
C2—C7 1.3889 (17) C13—C14 1.391 (2)
C2—C3 1.3976 (17) C13—C17 1.5077 (18)
C3—C4 1.4009 (17) C14—C15 1.395 (2)
C3—H3 0.9500 C14—H14 0.9500
C4—C5 1.3929 (19) C15—C16 1.3932 (18)
C4—C8 1.5095 (18) C15—C18 1.5064 (19)
C5—C6 1.3931 (18) C16—H16 0.9500
C5—H5 0.9500 C17—H17A 0.9800
C6—C7 1.4009 (17) C17—H17B 0.9800
C6—C9 1.5057 (17) C17—H17C 0.9800
C7—H7 0.9500 C18—H18A 0.9800
C8—H8A 0.9800 C18—H18B 0.9800
C8—H8B 0.9800 C18—H18C 0.9800
C8—H8C 0.9800
S1i—Ni1—S1 180.0 H9A—C9—H9B 109.5
S1i—Ni1—S2i 91.279 (10) C6—C9—H9C 109.5
S1—Ni1—S2i 88.723 (10) H9A—C9—H9C 109.5
S1i—Ni1—S2 88.721 (10) H9B—C9—H9C 109.5
S1—Ni1—S2 91.278 (10) C1—C10—C11 124.90 (10)
S2i—Ni1—S2 180.0 C1—C10—S2 118.26 (9)
C1—S1—Ni1 105.55 (4) C11—C10—S2 116.69 (8)
C10—S2—Ni1 105.63 (4) C12—C11—C16 118.96 (11)
C10—C1—C2 124.25 (11) C12—C11—C10 119.99 (11)
C10—C1—S1 119.28 (9) C16—C11—C10 120.89 (11)
C2—C1—S1 116.46 (9) C13—C12—C11 121.14 (12)
C7—C2—C3 120.32 (10) C13—C12—H12 119.4
C7—C2—C1 119.67 (11) C11—C12—H12 119.4
C3—C2—C1 120.01 (11) C12—C13—C14 118.88 (12)
C2—C3—C4 120.06 (12) C12—C13—C17 119.92 (13)
C2—C3—H3 120.0 C14—C13—C17 121.15 (12)
C4—C3—H3 120.0 C13—C14—C15 121.53 (12)
C5—C4—C3 118.48 (11) C13—C14—H14 119.2
C5—C4—C8 120.76 (11) C15—C14—H14 119.2
C3—C4—C8 120.75 (12) C16—C15—C14 118.76 (12)
C4—C5—C6 122.32 (11) C16—C15—C18 121.02 (13)
C4—C5—H5 118.8 C14—C15—C18 120.22 (13)
C6—C5—H5 118.8 C15—C16—C11 120.72 (12)
C5—C6—C7 118.23 (12) C15—C16—H16 119.6
C5—C6—C9 120.56 (11) C11—C16—H16 119.6
C7—C6—C9 121.20 (11) C13—C17—H17A 109.5
C2—C7—C6 120.53 (11) C13—C17—H17B 109.5
C2—C7—H7 119.7 H17A—C17—H17B 109.5
C6—C7—H7 119.7 C13—C17—H17C 109.5
C4—C8—H8A 109.5 H17A—C17—H17C 109.5
C4—C8—H8B 109.5 H17B—C17—H17C 109.5
H8A—C8—H8B 109.5 C15—C18—H18A 109.5
C4—C8—H8C 109.5 C15—C18—H18B 109.5
H8A—C8—H8C 109.5 H18A—C18—H18B 109.5
H8B—C8—H8C 109.5 C15—C18—H18C 109.5
C6—C9—H9A 109.5 H18A—C18—H18C 109.5
C6—C9—H9B 109.5 H18B—C18—H18C 109.5
Ni1—S1—C1—C10 1.02 (11) C2—C1—C10—S2 178.12 (9)
Ni1—S1—C1—C2 −177.97 (8) S1—C1—C10—S2 −0.78 (14)
C10—C1—C2—C7 −70.01 (16) Ni1—S2—C10—C1 0.13 (11)
S1—C1—C2—C7 108.92 (11) Ni1—S2—C10—C11 −175.73 (8)
C10—C1—C2—C3 109.54 (14) C1—C10—C11—C12 −41.64 (18)
S1—C1—C2—C3 −71.52 (13) S2—C10—C11—C12 133.91 (10)
C7—C2—C3—C4 2.22 (18) C1—C10—C11—C16 143.13 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −177.33 (11) S2—C10—C11—C16 −41.32 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −2.46 (18) C16—C11—C12—C13 0.06 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C8 176.27 (12) C10—C11—C12—C13 −175.26 (11)
C3—C4—C5—C6 1.02 (19) C11—C12—C13—C14 −0.76 (18)
C8—C4—C5—C6 −177.71 (13) C11—C12—C13—C17 176.79 (11)
C4—C5—C6—C7 0.68 (19) C12—C13—C14—C15 0.83 (19)
C4—C5—C6—C9 −179.67 (12) C17—C13—C14—C15 −176.69 (13)
C3—C2—C7—C6 −0.47 (18) C13—C14—C15—C16 −0.2 (2)
C1—C2—C7—C6 179.08 (11) C13—C14—C15—C18 179.27 (13)
C5—C6—C7—C2 −0.96 (18) C14—C15—C16—C11 −0.5 (2)
C9—C6—C7—C2 179.39 (11) C18—C15—C16—C11 −179.98 (13)
C2—C1—C10—C11 −6.39 (19) C12—C11—C16—C15 0.60 (18)
S1—C1—C10—C11 174.70 (9) C10—C11—C16—C15 175.88 (12)

Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+2, −z+1.

Funding Statement

Funding for this research was provided by: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (grant No. MRI: 1228232; grant No. CHE: 1836589).

References

  1. Arumugam, K., Bollinger, J. E., Fink, M. & Donahue, J. P. (2007). Inorg. Chem.46, 3283–3288. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Bigoli, F., Chen, C.-T., Wu, W.-C., Deplano, P., Mercuri, M. L., Pellinghelli, M. A., Pilia, L., Pintus, G., Serpe, A. & Trogu, E. F. (2001). Chem. Commun. pp. 2246–2247. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Bruker (2021). APEX4 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Das Gupta, T., Applebaum, J., Broussard, W., Mack, C., Wu, C., Mague, J. T. & Donahue, J. P. (2023). Acta Cryst. E79, 182–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Eisenberg, R. & Gray, H. B. (2011). Inorg. Chem.50, 9741–9751. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Faulmann, C. & Cassoux, P. (2004). Prog. Inorg. Chem.52, 399–489.
  8. Kato, R. (2004). Chem. Rev.104, 5319–5346. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Koehne, S., Mirmelli, B., Mague, J. T. & Donahue, J. P. (2022). IUCrData7, x220148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst.48, 3–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Kuramoto, N. & Asao, K. (1990). Dyes Pigments12, 65–76.
  12. Lim, B. S., Fomitchev, D. V. & Holm, R. H. (2001). Inorg. Chem.40, 4257–4262. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Megnamisi-Belombe, M. & Nuber, B. (1989). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn62, 4092–4094.
  14. Miao, Q., Gao, J., Wang, Z., Yu, H., Luo, Y. & Ma, T. (2011). Inorg. Chim. Acta376, 619–627.
  15. Mueller-Westerhoff, U. T., Vance, B. & Ihl Yoon, D. (1991). Tetrahedron47, 909–932.
  16. Nakazumi, H., Takamura, R., Kitao, T. & Adachi, T. (1992). Dyes Pigments18, 1–9.
  17. Nishio, M. (2012). J. Mol. Struct.1018, 2–7.
  18. Robertson, N. & Cronin, L. (2002). Coord. Chem. Rev.227, 93–127.
  19. Schrauzer, G. N. & Mayweg, V. P. (1965). J. Am. Chem. Soc.87, 1483–1489.
  20. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  22. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  23. Van Houten, K. A., Heath, D. C. & Pilato, R. S. (1998). J. Am. Chem. Soc.120, 12359–12360.
  24. Zarkadoulas, A., Field, M. J., Papatriantafyllopoulou, C., Fize, J., Artero, V. & Mitsopoulou, C. (2016). Inorg. Chem.55, 432–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025004293/jy2060sup1.cif

e-81-00534-sup1.cif (1,001KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989025004293/jy2060Isup2.hkl

e-81-00534-Isup2.hkl (250.8KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 2450503

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES