Abstract
In Paramecium tetraurelia, a number of mutations have been shown to affect simultaneously cortical organization (attachment of trichocysts to the cortex) and nuclear division (Ruiz et al. 1976). In order to analyze the genetic and physiological basis of this correlation, we have isolated new mutations affecting the properties of the trichocysts and studied their genetic relationships with other previously known mutations. Of 24 to 28 loci controlling the biogenesis and properties of the trichocysts, mutations only in the 16 to 20 loci that control trichocyst attachment to the cortex result in nuclear defects. Cytological observations show that all of these mutants display the same set of nuclear abnormalities: in particular, rounded shape of the resting macronucleus, mispositioning and defective elongation of the dividing macronucleus and unequal repartition of the macro- and micronuclei. This common syndrome is independent of both the mutagenic origin and the mutated locus. Furthermore, by microinjection, it is possible to localize the site of action of the mutations in either the trichocyst compartment or the nontrichocyst compartment. It was found by this technique that the nuclear syndrome is also independent of the site of action of the mutation. All the genetic and physiological data support the conclusion that the nuclear defects are the consequence of the lack of trichocyst attachment to the cortex: in wild-type cells, trichocyst attachment would induce a membranar or perimembranar state necessary for correct nuclear positioning during cell division. In the absence of trichocyst attachment, the cortical control of nuclear division would be abolished. The possible involvement of cytoskeletal links between surface and nuclei is discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aufderheide K. J. Saltatory motility of uninserted trichocysts and mitochondria in Paramecium tetraurelia. Science. 1977 Oct 21;198(4314):299–300. doi: 10.1126/science.910128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beale G. H., Jurand A. Three different types of mate-killer (mu) particle in Paramecium aurelia (syngen 1). J Cell Sci. 1966 Mar;1(1):31–34. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beisson J., Lefort-Tran M., Pouphile M., Rossignol M., Satir B. Genetic analysis of membrane differentiation in Paramecium. Freeze-fracture study of the trichocyst cycle in wild-type and mutant strains. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):126–143. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berke G., Fishelson Z. Possible role of nucleus-membrane interaction in capping of surface membrane receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Dec;73(12):4580–4583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.12.4580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blose S. H. Ten-nanometer filaments and mitosis: maintenance of structural continuity in dividing endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3372–3376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen J., Beisson J., Tucker J. B. Abnormal microtubule deployment during defective macronuclear division in a Paramecium mutant. J Cell Sci. 1980 Aug;44:153–167. doi: 10.1242/jcs.44.1.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DIPPELL R. V. A temporary stain for Paramecium and other ciliate protozoa. Stain Technol. 1955 Mar;30(2):69–71. doi: 10.3109/10520295509113746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edelman G. M. Surface modulation in cell recognition and cell growth. Science. 1976 Apr 16;192(4236):218–226. doi: 10.1126/science.769162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knowles J. K. An improved microinjection technique in Paramecium aurelia. Transfer of mitochondria conferring erythromycin-resistance. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Sep;88(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90620-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koizumi S. Microinjection and transfer of cytoplasm in Paramecium. Experiments on the transfer of kappa particles into cells at different stages. Exp Cell Res. 1974 Sep;88(1):74–78. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90619-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lazarides E. Actin, alpha-actinin, and tropomyosin interaction in the structural organization of actin filaments in nonmuscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1976 Feb;68(2):202–219. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.2.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz F., Adoutte A., Rossignol M., Beisson J. Genetic analysis of morphogenetic processes in Paramecium. I. A mutation affecting trichocyst formation and nuclear division. Genet Res. 1976 Apr;27(2):109–122. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tucker J. B., Beisson J., Roche D. L., Cohen J. Microtubules and control of macronuclear 'amitosis' in Paramecium. J Cell Sci. 1980 Aug;44:135–151. doi: 10.1242/jcs.44.1.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang E., Cross R. K., Choppin P. W. Involvement of microtubules and 10-nm filaments in the movement and positioning of nuclei in syncytia. J Cell Biol. 1979 Nov;83(2 Pt 1):320–337. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wigler M. H., Weinstein I. B. A preparative method for obtaining enucleated mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1975 Apr 7;63(3):669–674. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(75)80436-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Terra N. Some regulatory interactions between cell structures at the supramolecular level. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1978 Aug;53(3):427–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1978.tb00861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]