Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1980 Aug;95(4):833–853. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.4.833

Frameshift Suppression in SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE. II. Genetic Properties of Group II Suppressors

Michael R Culbertson 1,2,3, Karen M Underbrink 1,2,3, Gerald R Fink 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1214272  PMID: 7009318

Abstract

Suppressors of ICR-induced mutations that exhibit behavior similar to bacterial frameshift suppressors have been identified in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The yeast suppressors have been divided into two groups. One of these groups (Group II: SUF1, SUF3, SUF4, SUF5 and SUF6) appears to include a set of informational suppressors in which the vehicle of suppression is glycyl-tRNA. Some of the genetic properties of Group II suppressors are described in this communication.——Corevertants of the Group II frameshift mutations his4–519 and leu2–3 have been characterized to determine the spectrum of reversion events induced by the frameshift mutagen ICR-170. Seventythree ICR-induced corevertants were analyzed. With the exception of one corevertant, which carried an allele of SUF1, all carried alleles of SUF3 or SUF5. SUF1, SUF3, SUF4 and SUF6 were represented among spontaneous and UV-induced corevertants. In the course of these experiments one of the suppressors was mapped. SUF5, the probable structural gene for tRNAGLY1, is located between ade2 and ade9 on chromosome XV.——SUF1, SUF4 and SUF6 have novel properties and comprise a distinct subset of suppressors. Although these suppressors show no genetic linkage to each other, they share several common features including lethality in haploid pairwise combinations, reduced tRNAGLY3 isoacceptor activity and increased efficiency of suppression in strains carrying the cytoplasmically inherited [PSI] element. In addition, strains carrying SUF1, SUF4 or SUF6 are phenotypically unstable and give rise to mitotic Suf+ segregants at high frequency. These segregants invariably contain a linked, second-site mutation that maps in or adjacent to the suppressor gene itself. Strains carrying any of these suppressors also give rise to mitotic segregants that exhibit enhanced efficiency of suppression; mutations responsible for this phenotype map at two loci, upf1 and upf2. These genes show no genetic linkage to any of the Group II suppressors.——Methods that permit positive selection for mutants with decreased or enhanced efficiency of suppression have been devised in order to examine large numbers of variants. The importance of these interacting mutants is underscored by their potential utility in studying suppressor function at the molecular level.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Culbertson M. R., Charnas L., Johnson M. T., Fink G. R. Frameshifts and frameshift suppressors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1977 Aug;86(4):745–764. doi: 10.1093/genetics/86.4.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cummins C. M., Gaber R. F., Culbertson M. R., Mann R., Fink G. R. Frameshift suppression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. III. Isolation and genetic properties of group III suppressors. Genetics. 1980 Aug;95(4):855–879. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.4.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liebman S. W., Sherman F. Extrachromosomal psi+ determinant suppresses nonsense mutations in yeast. J Bacteriol. 1979 Sep;139(3):1068–1071. doi: 10.1128/jb.139.3.1068-1071.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liebman S. W., Stewart J. W., Sherman F. Serine substitutions caused by an ochre suppressor in yeast. J Mol Biol. 1975 Jun 5;94(4):595–610. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90324-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ono B. I., Stewart J. W., Sherman F. Yeast UAA suppressors effective in psi+ strains serine-inserting suppressors. J Mol Biol. 1979 Feb 15;128(1):81–100. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90309-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Perkins D. D. Biochemical Mutants in the Smut Fungus Ustilago Maydis. Genetics. 1949 Sep;34(5):607–626. doi: 10.1093/genetics/34.5.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Riddle D. L., Carbon J. Frameshift suppression: a nucleotide addition in the anticodon of a glycine transfer RNA. Nat New Biol. 1973 Apr 25;242(121):230–234. doi: 10.1038/newbio242230a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Riddle D. L., Roth J. R. Suppressors of frameshift mutations in Salmonella typhimurium. J Mol Biol. 1970 Nov 28;54(1):131–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90451-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yourno J. Similarity of cross-suppressible frameshifts in Salmonella typhimurium. J Mol Biol. 1971 Nov 28;62(1):223–231. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90141-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES