Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1980 Sep;96(1):275–296. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.1.275

Evolution of Interactions in Family-Structured Populations: Mixed Mating Models

Richard E Michod 1
PMCID: PMC1214295  PMID: 17249062

Abstract

The effect of inbreeding on sociality is studied theoretically for the evolution of interactions between siblings in certain mixed mating systems that give rise to inbreeding: sib with random mating and selfing with random mating. Two approaches are taken. First, specific models of altruism are studied for the various mating systems. In the case of the additive model, inbreeding facilitates the evolution of altruistic genes. Likewise, for the multiplicative model this is usually the case, as long as the costs of altruism are not too great. Second, the case of total altruism, in which the gene has zero individual fitness but increases the fitness of associates, is studied for a general fitness formulation. In this case, inbreeding often retards the ability of such genes to increase when rare, and the equilibrium frequency of those recessive genes that can increase is totally independent of the mating system and, consequently, of the amount of inbreeding. It appears from the results presented that inbreeding facilitates most forms of altruism, but retards extreme altruism. These results stem from the fact that inbreeding increases the within-family relatedness by increasing the between-family variance in allele frequency. In most cases this facilitates altruism. However, in the case of total altruism, only heterozygotes can pass on the altruistic allele, and inbreeding tends to decrease this heterozygote class. In either case, the important effect of inbreeding lies in altering the genotypic distribution of the interactions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Charlesworth B. Some models of the evolution of altruistic behaviour between siblings. J Theor Biol. 1978 May 22;72(2):297–319. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90095-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charnov E. L. An elementary treatment of the genetical theory of kin-selection. J Theor Biol. 1977 Jun 7;66(3):541–550. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90301-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clegg M. T., Kahler A. L., Allard R. W. Estimation of life cycle components of selection in an experimental plant population. Genetics. 1978 Aug;89(4):765–792. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.4.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenberg L. Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science. 1979 Nov 30;206(4422):1095–1097. doi: 10.1126/science.206.4422.1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jain S. K., Workman O. L. Generalized F-statistics and the theory of inbreeding and selection. Nature. 1967 May 13;214(5089):674–678. doi: 10.1038/214674a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kerr W E. Genetic Determination of Castes in the Genus Melipona. Genetics. 1950 Mar;35(2):143–152. doi: 10.1093/genetics/35.2.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kopecky A. L., Copeland D. P., Lusk J. E. Viability of Escherichia coli treated with colicin K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4631–4634. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Michod R. Genetical aspects of kin selection: effects of inbreeding. J Theor Biol. 1979 Nov 21;81(2):223–233. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90162-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. REEVE E. C. Inbreeding with the homozygotes at a disadvantage. Ann Hum Genet. 1955 Jun;19(4):332–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wade M. J. Kin selection: A classical approach and a general solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Dec;75(12):6154–6158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.12.6154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES