Abstract
In females of Drosophila melanogaster, compound autosomes enter the repulsion phase of meiosis uncommitted to a particular segregation pattern because their centromeres are not restricted to a bivalent pairing complex as a consequence of crossing over. Their distribution at anaphase, therefore, is determined by some meiotic property other than exchange pairing, a property that for many years has been associated with the concept of nonhomologous pairing. In the absence of heterologous rearrangements or a free Y chromosome, C(3L) and C(3R) are usually recovered in separate gametes, that is as products of meiotic segregation. Nevertheless, there is a regular, albeit infrequent, recovery of reciprocal meiotic products (the nonsegregational products) that are disomic and nullosomic for compound thirds. The frequency of these exceptions, which is normally between 0.5 and 5.0%, differs for the various strains examined, but remains constant for any given strain. Since previous studies have not uncovered a cause for this base level of nonsegregation, it has been referred to as the spontaneous frequency. In this study, crosses between males and females whose X chromosomes, as well as compound autosomes, are differentially marked reveal a highly significant positive correlation between the frequency of compound-autosome nonsegregation and the frequency of X-chromosome nondisjunction. However, an inverse correlation is found when the frequency of nondisjunction is related to the frequency of crossing over in the proximal region of the X chromosome. These findings have been examined with reference to the distributive pairing and the chromocentral models and interpreted as demonstrating (1) that nonsegregational meiotic events arise primarily as a result of nonhomologous interactions, (2) that forces responsible for the segregation of nonhomologous chromosomes are properties of the chromocentral region, and (3) that these forces come into expression after the exchange processes are complete.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker W. K. Evidence for position-effect suppression of the ribosomal RNA cistrons in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Oct;68(10):2472–2476. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.10.2472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baldwin M., Chovnick A. Autosomal half-tetrad analysis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1967 Feb;55(2):277–293. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.2.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bridges C. B. Non-Disjunction as Proof of the Chromosome Theory of Heredity (Concluded). Genetics. 1916 Mar;1(2):107–163. doi: 10.1093/genetics/1.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark A. M., Sobels F. H. Studies on non-disjunction of the major autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Methodology and rate of induction by x-rays for the compound second chromosome. Mutat Res. 1973 Apr;18(1):47–61. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(73)90020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper K. W., Zimmering S., Krivshenko J. INTERCHROMOSOMAL EFFECTS AND SEGREGATION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Nov 15;41(11):911–914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.11.911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dävring L., Sunner M. Female meiosis and embryonic mitosis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Meiosis and fertilization. Hereditas. 1973;73(1):51–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1973.tb01067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GRELL R. F. A new model for secondary nondisjunction: the role of distributive pairing. Genetics. 1962 Dec;47:1737–1754. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.12.1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holm D. G., Chovnick A. Compound autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster: The meiotic behavior of compound thirds. Genetics. 1975 Oct;81(2):293–311. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.2.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lütolf H. U. Meiotic segregation of compound-3 chromosomes in Drosophila. Genetica. 1972;43(3):431–442. doi: 10.1007/BF00156138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MERRIAM J. R., FROST J. N. EXCHANGE AND NONDISJUNCTION OF THE X CHROMOSOMES IN FEMALE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1964 Jan;49:109–122. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merriam J. R. The initiation of nonhomologous chromosome pairing before exchange in female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1967 Oct;57(2):409–425. doi: 10.1093/genetics/57.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore C. M., Grell R. F. Factors affecting recognition and disjunction of chromosomes at distributive pairing in female Drosophila melanogaster. I. Total length vs. arm length. Genetics. 1972 Apr;70(4):567–581. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.4.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NOVITSKI E. AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE DISTRIBUTIVE PAIRING HYPOTHESIS IN DROSOPHILA. Genetics. 1964 Dec;50:1449–1451. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.6.1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nokkala S., Puro J. Cytological evidence for a chromocenter in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes. Hereditas. 1976;83(2):265–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1976.tb01591.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]