Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 May 8;17(5):e83751. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83751

Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Elevation in Routine Screening Unveils Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma

Farha Munira Mohamed Kamel 1,, Noor Azimah Muhammad 1, Amir Zharif Adenan 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12145215  PMID: 40486318

Abstract

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a tumor marker most often associated with colorectal cancer, but elevated levels may also indicate other malignancies, including lung cancer. Although not recommended as a standalone screening or diagnostic tool, persistent elevation in CEA levels may warrant further investigation. This case report describes a 71-year-old woman who was found to have progressively rising CEA levels during routine private health screening despite being asymptomatic. Initial workup, including colonoscopy, revealed no evidence of colorectal malignancy. However, further evaluation prompted by new respiratory symptoms and imaging findings led to the diagnosis of Stage IVa lung adenocarcinoma. This case underscores the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach in patients with unexplained tumor marker elevation. It highlights the potential role of primary care in identifying atypical presentations of serious conditions.

Keywords: atypical presentation, cea, colonoscopy, lung adenocarcinoma, malignant pleural effusion

Introduction

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a nonspecific tumor marker not recommended as a cancer screening tool. CEA levels are expected to decline with age, and a continuous increase warrants thorough evaluation, particularly for gastrointestinal malignancies such as colorectal cancer. Elevated CEA levels are often associated with advanced or metastatic disease and are primarily used for monitoring cancer treatment response or post-treatment surveillance for recurrence [1,2]. However, its diagnostic specificity and sensitivity remain limited, and some practitioners have inappropriately used it for wellness screening. A CEA level above 2.9 ng/mL in asymptomatic, low-risk individuals does not necessarily indicate advanced gastrointestinal cancer with metastases. Elevated CEA levels may also be seen in lung cancer, non-malignant conditions such as acute and chronic inflammation, benign tumors, renal or hepatic insufficiency, and in smokers [3].

An isolated elevation in CEA poses a diagnostic challenge, particularly in an asymptomatic individual. A comprehensive clinical assessment, including imaging and molecular diagnostics, is crucial to determine the underlying cause. This case report provides insights into the diagnostic approach for nonspecific tumor marker elevations and highlights the role of personalized medicine in oncological management.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old woman was found to have progressively elevated CEA levels during private health screening and follow-up. The initial CEA level was 48.6 ng/mL, which rose to 804.2 ng/mL over 12 months. Concurrently, two other tumor markers, cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 and CA 125, demonstrated an increasing trend (Table 1). Throughout this period, the patient remained asymptomatic. She was a known β-thalassemia carrier and had been on long-term treatment for hypertension and dyslipidemia. She had a history of premature menopause at the age of 44 following a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts. She was a lifelong non-smoker, had no significant medical or family history of malignancy, and led an active, healthy lifestyle.

Table 1. Summary of the patient’s tumor marker trend.

CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen, CA: cancer antigen

CEA level (ng/mL) CA 19-9 (U/mL) CA 125 (U/mL)
0-5 0-37 0-35
48.6 - -
123.0 23.0 16.0
145.5 - -
571.8 - -
754.9 28.0 113.0
804.2 - -

Given the significant elevation in CEA, she was referred to a tertiary center with an initial clinical suspicion of colorectal carcinoma. Colonoscopy revealed only benign findings, including colonic diverticulosis and a small hyperplastic polyp, with no evidence of malignancy. While undergoing further investigations, the patient began to experience shortness of breath, and examination revealed oxygen saturation of 90% on room air. A chest radiograph (Figure 1) and CT scan of the thorax showed a massive left-sided pleural effusion, a right upper lobe lung nodule, and mediastinal lymphadenopathies.

Figure 1. Chest radiograph showing a wiped-out left lung with tracheal and mediastinal shift to the right.

Figure 1

A CT-guided biopsy of the lung nodule along with pleural fluid cytology confirmed the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma (Figure 2). Immunohistochemical staining of the samples demonstrated thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) positivity. Molecular analysis revealed the presence of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion mutation. The disease was staged as stage IVa (T1cN3M1a) lung adenocarcinoma, characterized by a small primary lung lesion with extensive lymphatic and intrathoracic metastasis. Management was focused on symptomatic relief and targeted therapy. A temporary indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) was inserted to alleviate dyspnea, and treatment with gefitinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was initiated.

Figure 2. Axial CT scans of the thorax demonstrating a large left pleural effusion with passive compression of the underlying lung (A), mediastinal shift to the right due to mass effect from the effusion (green arrow, B), prominent mediastinal lymphadenopathy suggestive of possible lymph node metastases (blue arrows, C), and a small, indeterminate right upper lobe pulmonary nodule (red arrow, D).

Figure 2

CT: computed tomography

Discussion

This case highlights the diagnostic challenges and clinical importance of monitoring tumor markers, particularly CEA, in asymptomatic patients undergoing wellness health screening. Apart from being linked to colorectal cancer, CEA may be elevated in lung, gastric, and pancreatic cancers [4]. However, due to its limited sensitivity and specificity (48.2% sensitivity, 93.8% specificity), CEA is not recommended as a stand-alone screening tool [5,6]. Its primary clinical utility lies in monitoring disease progression or recurrence [7].

The concurrent elevation of CA-125 and CA 19-9 in this patient further supported the presence of malignancy, prompting more detailed investigations. Nonetheless, using tumor markers such as CEA, CA 19-9, or CA-125 as exclusive tools for lung cancer screening is not recommended. Elevated CEA in lung adenocarcinoma helps support diagnosis and monitor disease course but should not be relied upon for screening [8,9]. While CA 19-9 is commonly associated with gastrointestinal malignancies [10,11] and CA-125 with ovarian cancers, both markers have limited roles in diagnosing lung cancer [11].

Although combining these markers may improve sensitivity, the issue of specificity remains, making them more suitable for prognostication, treatment monitoring, and recurrence detection rather than for primary diagnosis [12]. CEA, in comparison, has demonstrated higher specificity and is more reliable than CA-125 in the context of malignant pleural effusions [13,14]. When both CEA and CA-125 are elevated, the likelihood of malignant pleural effusion increases significantly, with one study reporting a 105-fold increase in risk [13].

The initial suspicion of colorectal cancer based on progressively rising CEA levels was reasonable but was ruled out following benign colonoscopy findings. Subsequent chest radiograph and CT of the thorax revealed evidence suggestive of lung cancer. These findings reinforce the necessity of integrating imaging modalities into the diagnostic workup of unexplained tumor marker elevations. Combining imaging and tumor markers can help detect subclinical disease, aid in risk stratification, and prevent unnecessary interventions [15,16].

The final diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma was confirmed through cytopathological examination and immunohistochemical positivity for TTF-1 and CK7 on pleural fluid and tissue biopsy. The detection of an EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation enabled targeted therapy with gefitinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, highlighting advancements in precision oncology [17]. This personalized approach and symptomatic relief through an IPC improved the patient’s quality of life and prognosis.

Conclusions

This case emphasizes the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for malignancy in elderly patients, even in the absence of classic symptoms and when initial investigations are inconclusive. It underscores the value of a comprehensive diagnostic approach integrating tumor markers, imaging modalities, and molecular diagnostics. Molecular profiling, as demonstrated by identifying the EGFR mutation and the subsequent use of gefitinib, exemplifies the critical role of personalized medicine in improving outcomes for patients with advanced-stage malignancies.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the patient and the multidisciplinary teams involved in diagnosing and managing this case.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Farha Munira Mohamed Kamel, Noor Azimah Muhammad, Amir Zharif Adenan

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Farha Munira Mohamed Kamel

Drafting of the manuscript:  Farha Munira Mohamed Kamel, Amir Zharif Adenan

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Farha Munira Mohamed Kamel, Noor Azimah Muhammad, Amir Zharif Adenan

Supervision:  Noor Azimah Muhammad

References

  • 1.A review of the role of carcinoembryonic antigen in clinical practice. Hall C, Clarke L, Pal A, Buchwald P, Eglinton T, Wakeman C, Frizelle F. Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35:294–305. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.11.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen): its role as a marker in the management of cancer. Goldenberg DM, Neville AM, Carter AC, et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1981;101:239–242. doi: 10.1007/BF00410109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Lung Cancer. 2012;76:138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Combined detection of CEA and CA125 for the diagnosis for lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Wu LX, Li XF, Chen HF, et al. Cell Mol Biol. 2018;64:67–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.A clinicopathological study of the correlation of level of carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal carcinoma in a tertiary care medical college in Eastern India. Nath S, Karmakar S, Ranjan S. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2023;14:329–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.A novel three-biomarker signature (CA-62, CEA, CYFRA 21-1) and early-stage NSC lung cancer detection. Tcherkassova J, Tsurkan S, Prostyakova A, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:3038. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CEA increase as a marker of disease progression after first-line induction therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. A pooled analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies. Moretto R, Rossini D, Conca V, et al. Br J Cancer. 2021;125:839–845. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01483-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Evaluating lung cancer with tumor markers: CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 125. Aydın S, Balcı A, Emin M. J Contemp Med. 2021;11:282–287. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tumor markers (CEA, CA 125, CYFRA 21-1, SCC and NSE) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer as an aid in histological diagnosis and prognosis. Comparison with the main clinical and pathological prognostic factors. Molina R, Filella X, Augé JM, et al. Tumour Biol. 2003;24:209–218. doi: 10.1159/000074432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.The efficacy of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels in determining the malignancy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Bekci TT, Senol T, Maden E. J Int Med Res. 2009;37:438–445. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Role of serum tumor biomarkers in evaluating lung cancer. Khan R, Javed A, Kumar V. Lancet. 2020:2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Identifying the best marker combination in CEA, CA125, CY211, NSE, and SCC for lung cancer screening by combining ROC curve and logistic regression analyses: is it feasible? Yang Q, Zhang P, Wu R, Lu K, Zhou H. Dis Markers. 2018;2018:2082840. doi: 10.1155/2018/2082840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) as diagnostic biomarkers for malignant pleural effusion. Harsini H, Kurniawan YD, Sutanto Y. Respir Sci. 2024;4:164–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pleural CEA, CA-15-3, CYFRA 21-1, CA-19-9, CA-125 discriminating malignant from benign pleural effusions: diagnostic cancer biomarkers. Fazli Khalaf F, Asadi Gharabaghi M, Balibegloo M, Davari H, Afshar S, Jahanbin B. Int J Biol Markers. 2023;38:81–88. doi: 10.1177/03936155231158661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Evaluation of comparative surveillance strategies of circulating tumor DNA, imaging, and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with resected colorectal cancer. Fakih M, Sandhu J, Wang C, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:221093. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Comparison of serum tumor markers combined with dual-source CT in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Shan Y, Yin X, Zhao N, Wang J, Yang S. Minerva Med. 2023;114:795–801. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.21.07124-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meta-analysis of targeted therapies in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: efficacy and safety of osimertinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib as first-line treatment. Qureshi Z, Altaf F, Jamil A, Siddique R. Am J Clin Oncol. 2025;48:44–54. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES