Abstract
The developmental mismatch hypothesis (DMH) proposes that a mismatch in maturational timing of the amygdala and prefrontal cortex (PFC) drives adolescent sensation-seeking behaviour. While some studies provide support for the DMH, few have evaluated sex differences or examined both grey and white matter. Here, we used T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine amygdala and PFC macrostructure and amygdala-PFC white matter microstructure development across 606 MRI sessions from 148 typically developing children and adolescents (76 females) aged 1.95–17.71 years. Using generalized additive mixed effects models, we evaluated the maturational timing of amygdala volume, four PFC subregion volumes, and fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of the uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC white matter tracts. Amygdala and PFC maturation was consistent with the DMH in males but less so in females. Relative to males, females exhibited less amygdala development and shorter periods of PFC development. In contrast to gray matter volumes, white matter changed continuously from early childhood to late adolescence, but ended earlier in females than in males. Our findings show different amygdala-PFC maturation patterns and that the amygdala-PFC neural system reaches maturity earlier in females than in males. These important differences may underlie sex differences in sensation-seeking behaviour.
Keywords: Neurodevelopment, Maturation, Magnetic resonance imaging, Amygdala, Prefrontal cortex, Grey matter
1. Introduction
The timing of human brain development varies regionally (Konrad et al., 2013). Among many patterns, one is that subcortical regions develop earlier than cortical regions (Mills et al., 2014, Casey et al., 2008, Shulman et al., 2016, Somerville et al., 2009). The developmental mismatch hypothesis (DMH) proposes that the difference in maturational timing between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex (PFC) is most prominent in early adolescence when amygdala development plateaus and PFC development accelerates (Mills et al., 2014, Casey et al., 2008, Shulman et al., 2016, Somerville et al., 2009, Steinberg, 2008). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) research suggests that during adolescence, early maturing subcortical systems underlying reward-seeking behaviour have higher functional activation during emotion and reward processing compared to the slower-to-mature cortical systems that regulate executive functions and higher-order cognition (Ernst et al., 2005, Galvan et al., 2006, Geier et al., 2010). This mismatch may result in elevated emotion and reward system activation (Mills et al., 2014, Galván, 2010, Shulman et al., 2016). The DMH implicates elevated amygdala functional activation and reduced PFC functional activation in the development of normative sensation-seeking behaviours, especially in adolescence (Mills et al., 2014, Casey et al., 2008, Shulman et al., 2016, Somerville et al., 2009, Steinberg, 2008).
Amygdala volume increases rapidly in early childhood and begins to plateau during late childhood and adolescence (Alex et al., 2024, Dima et al., 2021, Russell et al., 2021, Uematsu et al., 2012), though some work has suggested that amygdala volume may increase up to 20 years of age (Mills et al., 2014, Frere et al., 2020, Goddings et al., 2014, Thompson et al., 2020, Wierenga et al., 2014). On the other hand, PFC volume generally follows an inverted U-shaped trajectory, increasing rapidly early in life and then gradually decreasing between 6 and 30 years (Amlien et al., 2016, Bethlehem et al., 2022, Brain Development Cooperative Group, 2012, Brown and Jernigan, 2012, Frere et al., 2020, Giedd et al., 1999, Kelly et al., 2024, Koolschijn and Crone, 2013, Lenroot et al., 2007, Mills et al., 2014, Mills et al., 2014, Remer et al., 2017, Sowell et al., 1999, Tamnes et al., 2017, Villa et al., 2021). Voxel-based cortical volume studies suggest that PFC development is relatively uniform, with PFC subregions exhibiting similar rates of change (Amlien et al., 2016, Brown and Jernigan, 2012, Tamnes et al., 2017). However, some studies have reported that specific subregions, such as the frontal pole and orbital frontal cortex, show earlier volume decreases than the rest of the PFC (Amlien et al., 2016, Brown and Jernigan, 2012, Vijayakumar et al., 2016). While early amygdala and protracted PFC changes support the DMH and have been widely reported, these trends have rarely been compared using the same dataset. Further, many prior studies are cross-sectional, which can bias estimates of change over time (Horga et al., 2014). Additionally, previous longitudinal work has used models that assume linear, quadratic, or cubic trajectories. Newer models that fit non-linear trajectories with varying degrees of wiggliness can capture nuanced age-related changes in brain metrics and estimate rates of change at specific ages (McCormick et al., 2023).
The amygdala and PFC are connected by two primary white matter pathways: the uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC tracts (Fig. 2; Fields, 2010). The uncinate fasciculus connects the inferior frontal gyrus, frontal pole, and orbital frontal cortex to the anterior temporal lobes by passing through the amygdala (Ebeling and von Cramon, 1992, Kier et al., 2004). The amygdala-PFC tract passes laterally through the superior internal capsule from the amygdala and terminates in the middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, frontal pole, and orbital frontal cortex (Hay et al., 2019). The uncinate fasciculus has one of the most prolonged developmental trajectories of the major white matter tracts, undergoing fractional anisotropy (FA) increases and mean diffusivity (MD) decreases past 25 years of age (Asato et al., 2010, Chen et al., 2016, Jáni et al., 2024, Lebel et al., 2012, Lebel et al., 2008, Simmonds et al., 2014); in contrast, amygdala-PFC tract microstructure development has not been characterized. These connections are critical for amygdala-PFC communication, with prior multimodal work reporting a negative relationship between amygdala-PFC structural connectivity, as measured by FA and connectivity probability values, and amygdala functional activation during an emotion recognition task (Goetschius et al., 2019, Swartz et al., 2014). Low amygdala-PFC white matter FA and connectivity probability values have also been associated with increased amygdala-driven internalizing behaviours like anxiety (Eden et al., 2015, Greening and Mitchell, 2015, Kim and Whalen, 2009, Swartz et al., 2014). Although white matter microstructure development has been proposed to contribute to sensation-seeking behaviour in DMH literature (Steinberg, 2008), uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC tract changes have not been investigated in a broad longitudinal sample, and have not been evaluated in conjunction with amygdala and PFC volumes.
Fig. 2.
Lateral view of the five grey matter regions and two reconstructed white matter tracts of interest (left hemisphere shown, but both hemispheres were measured) of a 3.74-year-old female participant (A = anterior, P = posterior, S = superior, I = inferior).
Larger amygdala and PFC volumes in males than females have been observed with and without intracranial volume (ICV) corrections (Mills et al., 2014, Goddings et al., 2014, Kelly et al., 2024, Koolschijn and Crone, 2013, Long et al., 2024, Uematsu et al., 2012). Similarly, males have higher mean uncinate fasciculus FA than females (Lebel et al., 2012, Kierońska et al., 2020, Lebel and Beaulieu, 2011). Few studies have investigated sex differences in maturational timing; however, a handful show earlier amygdala volume growth in females compared to males (Goddings et al., 2014, Uematsu et al., 2012). Prior research on the PFC has been mixed, with some studies reporting that female frontal grey matter volumes peak and plateau earlier than males (Giedd et al., 1999, Lenroot et al., 2007, Remer et al., 2017, Tanaka et al., 2012), and others reporting no sex differences in PFC volume development (Mills et al., 2014b). Some studies have noted more protracted trajectories of uncinate fasciculus FA and MD in males (Clayden et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2012), while others have reported no sex differences (Frere et al., 2020, Krogsrud et al., 2016, Lebel et al., 2012, Lebel et al., 2008, Lebel and Beaulieu, 2011, Muftuler et al., 2012, Simmonds et al., 2014). Further research is needed to clarify the effects of sex on the timing of brain development because they may drive sex differences in behaviours, such as sensation-seeking and impulsivity, which peak later and manifest more prominently in males than females (Shulman et al., 2015, Siraj et al., 2021).
A longitudinal study of 33 typically developing participants aged 7–30 years showed that amygdala volume stabilized earlier than PFC volume at both group and participant levels, indicating a developmental mismatch (Mills et al., 2014a). This mismatch was not related to retrospective reports of adolescent sensation-seeking behaviour collected in adulthood, and sex differences in trajectories were not examined. Another longitudinal study of 335 typically developing participants aged 14–16 years showed faster amygdala volume increases in males and slower PFC volume decreases in females (Frere et al., 2020). No sex-by-age interactions were observed in uncinate fasciculus and cingulum FA or MD (Frere et al., 2020). While sex differences in externalizing and internalizing behaviours were not observed, sex differences in positive personality traits such as generosity, caring, and affection were mediated by amygdala volume (Frere et al., 2020). These studies highlight the existence of developmental mismatches but point to the need for further investigation of sex differences across childhood and adolescence to better understand how brain development may influence behaviour.
The present study used a large longitudinal dataset, two MRI modalities, and advanced non-linear modelling to investigate amygdala and PFC (middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, frontal pole, orbital frontal cortex) volume, and uncinate fasciculus, and amygdala-PFC tract FA and MD developmental mismatches in females and males aged 1.95–17.71 years. We hypothesized that, in both sexes, amygdala and PFC volume maturational timing would be mismatched, with early amygdala volume increases in childhood and later PFC volume decreases in adolescence. We also expected amygdala-PFC white matter to follow a different maturational timing pattern from volume, with FA increasing and MD decreasing across childhood and adolescence. Additionally, we hypothesized that, compared to males, females would develop faster and plateau earlier in all metrics.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
This study was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (REB23–0757). Typically developing child and adolescent MRI data were combined from four longitudinal studies conducted in Calgary, Alberta. Dataset 1 (92 participants/481 MRI sessions) was a longitudinal cohort study of typically developing participants recruited between ages 2–6 years who underwent MRI and cognitive assessments (Reynolds et al., 2020). Participants provided longitudinal data at intervals of 6–36 months until later childhood or early adolescence (up to 12 years of age) (Reynolds et al., 2020). Participants were identified as female or male based on their medical records. Dataset 2 (26 participants/60 MRI sessions) was a longitudinal cohort study of typically developing participants recruited between ages 6–15 years who underwent MRI and cognitive assessments (Geeraert et al., 2020). Some participants returned 2 and/or 4 years later to provide longitudinal data (6–17 years of age). Participant parents/guardians reported if their child was female or male. Dataset 3 (9 participants/23 MRI sessions) is an ongoing longitudinal cohort study of children and youth with prenatal alcohol exposure, as well as unexposed controls, who were recruited between 7 and 18 years of age and undergo MRI every 24 months and cognitive assessments every 12 months (Lebel et al., 2021); only unexposed controls were included here. Participant parents/guardians reported if their child was female or male. Dataset 4 (21 participants/42 MRI sessions) was a longitudinal cohort study of mild traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injury participants aged 8–17 years who underwent MRI and cognitive assessments within 10 days post-injury and at either 3- or 6-months post-injury (Yeates et al., 2017); only orthopedic injury controls were included here. Participants were identified as female or male based on parent reports of sex at birth.
All participants were born after 34 weeks gestation, free from genetic and neurodevelopmental disorder diagnoses at the time of recruitment, and had no contraindications for MRI scanning. Parent/guardian written informed consent was obtained for all participants. When possible, child assent was also obtained. The sample included 148 participants (76 females) with 606 longitudinal scan sessions (range 2–23 sessions/participant, average 4.09 sessions/participant) with good quality T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted images collected across 1.95–17.71 years of age (Fig. 1). Males and females were well-matched across the age span. The average interscan interval was 1.09 years. Demographic characteristics are listed in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1.
Fig. 1.
Age at scan for all participants. Each line represents a participant, and each shape represents a participant’s scan session included in the sample.
Table 1.
Sample demographics by sex. Two-sample t-test and Fisher’s exact test results comparing sample demographics between females and males.
| Female (n = 76) | Male (n = 72) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Mean | 7.91 + /- 3.63 | 7.35 + /- 3.61 | .058 |
| Median | 7.25 | 6.35 | NA | |
| Minimum | 2.49 | 1.95 | NA | |
| Maximum | 17.71 | 17.07 | NA | |
| Parental Marital Status | Single | 5 (6.6 %) | 6 (8.3 %) | .339 |
| Married/Cohabitating | 70 (92.1 %) | 66 (91.7 %) | ||
| Not Reported | 1 (1.3 %) | 0 | ||
| Household Income ($CAD/year) | Less than 25,000 | 0 | 1 (1.4 %) | .944 |
| 25,000–49,999 | 3 (3.9 %) | 3 (4.2 %) | ||
| 50,000–74,999 | 3 (3.9 %) | 5 (6.9 %) | ||
| 75,000–99,999 | 15 (19.7 %) | 13 (18.1 %) | ||
| 100,000–124,999 | 16 (21.1 %) | 13 (18.1 % | ||
| 125,000–149,999 | 5 (6.6 %) | 4 (5.6 %) | ||
| 150,000–174,999 | 8 (10.5 %) | 7 (9.7 %) | ||
| More than 175,000 | 25 (32.9 %) | 22 (30.6 %) | ||
| Not Reported | 1 (1.3 %) | 4 (5.6 %) | ||
| Maternal Education | Some High School | 1 (1.3 %) | 1 (1.4 %) | .868 |
| High School Diploma | 1 (1.3 %) | 3 (4.2 %) | ||
| Some Postsecondary | 4 (5.3 %) | 3 (4.2 %) | ||
| Trade/Technical Diploma | 17 (22.4 %) | 12 (16.7 %) | ||
| Undergraduate Degree | 32 (42.1 %) | 30 (41.7 %) | ||
| Some Postgraduate | 0 | 1 (1.4 %) | ||
| Postgraduate Degree | 18 (23.7 %) | 21 (29.2 %) | ||
| Not Reported | 3 (3.9 %) | 1 (1.4 %) |
2.2. Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition
All four datasets were collected at the Alberta Children’s Hospital using the same research-dedicated 3 T General Electric MR750w scanner with a 32-channel head coil. The MRI protocols are outlined in Table 2. Participants were not sedated and either slept naturally or watched a movie of their choice.
Table 2.
T1 and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging protocols. FSPGR BRAVO = Fast SPoiled GRadient echo BRAin VOlume Imaging; TR = repetition time; TE = echo time; TI = inversion time; SE-EPI = spin-echo echo planar imaging.
| Dataset Number | T1-weighted Protocol | Diffusion-weighted Protocol | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dataset 1 | Sequence | FSPGR BRAVO | Sequence | SE-EPI |
| Scan Time (min) | 4:26 | Scan Time (min) | 4:03 | |
| Resolution (mm3) | 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 | Resolution (mm3) | 1.6 × 1.6 × 2.2 | |
| TR (ms) | 8.23 | TR (ms) | 6750 | |
| TE (ms) | 3.76 | TE (ms) | 79 | |
| TI (ms) | 540 | Non-gradient Encoding Directions | 5 interleaved images at b= 0 s/mm2 | |
| Flip Angle (degrees) | 12 | Gradient Encoding Directions | 30 images at b= 750 s/mm2 | |
| Dataset 2 | Sequence | FSPGR BRAVO | Sequence | SE-EPI |
| Scan Time (min) | 5:38 | Scan Time (min) | 7:12 | |
| Resolution (mm3) | 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 | Resolution (mm3) | 2.2 × 2.2 × 2.2 | |
| TR (ms) | 8.25 | TR (ms) | 12,000 | |
| TE (ms) | 3.2 | TE (ms) | 88 | |
| TI (ms) | 600 | Non-gradient Encoding Directions | 5 interleaved images at b= 0 s/mm2 | |
| Flip Angle | 10 | Gradient Encoding Directions | 30 images at b= 900 s/mm2 | |
| Dataset 3 | Sequence | FSPGR BRAVO | Sequence | SE-EPI |
| Scan Time (min) | 5:38 | Scan Time (min) | 7:08 | |
| Resolution (mm3) | 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 | Resolution (mm3) | 2.2 × 2.2 × 2.2 | |
| TR (ms) | 8.25 | TR (ms) | 13,500 | |
| TE (ms) | 3.2 | TE (ms) | 88 | |
| TI (ms) | 600 | Non-gradient Encoding Directions | 5 non-interleaved images at b= 0 s/mm2 | |
| Flip Angle | 10 | Gradient Encoding Directions | 20 images at b= 900 s/mm2 | |
| Dataset 4 | Sequence | FSPGR BRAVO | Sequence | SE-EPI |
| Scan Time (min) | 5:38 | Scan Time (min) | 7:12 | |
| Resolution (mm3) | 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 | Resolution (mm3) | 2.2 × 2.2 × 2.2 | |
| TR (ms) | 8.25 | TR (ms) | 12,000 | |
| TE (ms) | 3.2 | TE (ms) | 88 | |
| TI (ms) | 600 | Non-gradient Encoding Directions | 5 interleaved images at b= 0 s/mm2 | |
| Flip Angle | 10 | Gradient Encoding Directions | 30 images at b= 900 s/mm2 | |
2.3. Image processing
2.3.1. T1-weighted images
N4 bias correction (Tustison et al., 2010) and 1 mm isotropic voxel size resampling (Cox, 1996) were performed on all T1-weighted images. Images were segmented using the Multi-atlas Cortical Reconstruction Using Implicit Surface Evolution (MaCRUISE) pipeline at the Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Center for Computational Imaging (Huo et al., 2016, Huo et al., 2016). MaCRUISE integrates cortical reconstruction and multi-atlas segmentation to produce reliable and consistent cortical surface parcellations in anatomical agreement with brain segmentation across a broad age range (Huo et al., 2016, Huo et al., 2016, Long et al., 2024). Trained raters manually checked the T1-weighted images and refined segmentations for quality and accuracy per protocols outlined in previously published works (Long et al., 2024). Of the 789 successfully collected longitudinal scan sessions with T1 and diffusion-weighted images, 713 (90 %) sessions had good-quality T1-weighted images. Scan sessions with poorly rated T1-weighted images were excluded from our sample.
Longitudinal registration was performed to remove deviation from biological plausibility caused by additive effects of minor segmentation errors that may arise from the MaCRUISE pipeline and alter longitudinal trajectories on the participant level (Long et al., 2024). The T1-weighted image of a participant’s middle scan (median scan age +/- 3 years) was registered to each of their other time points using a rigid, affine, and non-linear registration (NiftyReg—CMIC 2019). The resulting transformation fields were applied to the MaCRUISE segmentation of each participant’s middle image to warp the middle segmentation into the native space of each previous and subsequent time point. Trained raters re-evaluated the longitudinally registered T1-weighted images and segmentations for quality and accuracy per previously published protocols (Long et al., 2024). Of the 674 scan sessions with good quality longitudinally-registered T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted images (see diffusion-weighted image exclusion numbers in Section 2.3.2), 640 (95 %) had good quality longitudinally registered, refined segmentations. Longitudinally registered, refined segmentations with poor ratings were excluded from our final sample. 29 additional scan sessions were excluded from our final sample because, after T1 and diffusion-weighted exclusions, the data were cross-sectional and ineligible for our longitudinal sample. Using in-house MATLAB scripts, ICV and regional volumes (mm3) were calculated from the good-quality segmentations in the native space of each time point. Left and right amygdala and PFC volume were used in analyses (Fig. 2). Four PFC subregions were evaluated: the middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, frontal pole, and orbital frontal cortex. Middle frontal gyrus and frontal pole volume were obtained from the single middle frontal gyrus and frontal pole MaCRUISE volumetric labels. The triangular, orbital, and opercular inferior frontal gyrus MaCRUISE volumetric labels were combined to create a single inferior frontal gyrus volume metric (Klein and Tourville, 2012). The anterior, lateral, medial, and posterior orbital frontal cortex MaCRUISE volumetric labels were combined to create a single orbital frontal cortex volume metric (Rolls et al., 2015).
2.3.2. Diffusion-weighted images
Trained raters manually quality-checked raw diffusion-weighted images following previously published methods (Reynolds et al., 2019a). Of the 789 successfully collected longitudinal scan sessions with T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted images, 750 (95 %) sessions had good-quality diffusion-weighted images. Scan sessions with poorly rated diffusion-weighted images were excluded from our final sample. Using ExploreDTI (Leemans et al., 2009), each image from datasets 1, 2, and 4 was flipped and permutated into a uniform orientation and corrected for signal drift, Gibbs ringing effects, participant motion, and eddy current distortions. Images from dataset 3 underwent the same preprocessing steps except for signal drift correction, which was not performed because the dataset had non-interleaved b = 0 s/mm2 images, preventing signal drift magnitude estimation (Hansen et al., 2018). For each image, whole-brain deterministic fibre tractography was performed to reconstruct all the white matter tracts in the brain using a minimum FA threshold of 0.15 and an angle threshold of 30°. Semi-automated tractography isolated the uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC tracts in the left and right hemispheres of each image (Fig. 2) (Reynolds et al., 2019, Hay et al., 2019). Tract quality was manually assessed, and additional exclusion criteria were added on a tract-by-tract basis to eliminate spurious fibres. Average FA and MD were calculated for each tract for each participant.
2.4. Metric harmonization
Metric harmonization and statistical analyses were performed in RStudio (R version 4.3.2; RStudio version 2023.06.0 +421) (Posit Team, 2023). To account for differences in brain metrics caused by variations in scan sequences, ComBat Harmonization was performed separately for left and right regional volumes, FA, and MD values (R package neuroCombat version 1.0.13) (Fortin et al., 2018, Fortin et al., 2017, Johnson et al., 2007). In ComBat Harmonization models for T1-weighted image metrics, data were grouped based on protocol sequence and a batch term of two was used (“scanner 1” = dataset 1, “scanner 2” = datasets 2, 3, 4). In ComBat Harmonization models for diffusion-weighted image metrics, data were grouped based on protocol sequence and a batch term of three was used (“scanner 1” = dataset 1, “scanner 2” = datasets 2 and 4, “scanner 3” = dataset 3). A covariate matrix with age at scan and sex was included in each model to preserve biological variability in the data (Fortin et al., 2017). The empirical Bayes estimation option was not applied (eb = FALSE) because each metric was harmonized separately (number of features < scans) (Onicas et al. 2022b). For each metric, the following model was used to harmonize the data:
neuroCombat(dat = Metric, batch = Scanner, mod = mod, eb = FALSE)
Values four standard deviations above or below the group mean of each metric were identified and deemed outliers. One FA value and four MD values from different scan sessions and participants were identified. Any scan session with an outlier value was excluded from the sample to ensure all final scan sessions had good quality and non-outlier volume, FA, and MD data. One additional scan session was removed because the participant no longer had longitudinal data after outlier removal.
2.5. Statistical analysis
Two-sample t-tests and Fisher’s exact tests were performed to test sex differences in mean age, parental marital status, household income, and maternal education.
Volume, FA, and MD values were standardized to z-scores across the study cohort (R package base) (R Core Team, 2023). Standardized volume, FA, and MD developmental trajectories were modelled using generalized additive mixed effects models (GAMMs) (R package mgcv version 1.9.0) (Wood, 2004, Wood, 2017). GAMMs use splines to fit linear and non-linear relationships between predictors (i.e., age) and response variables (i.e., volume, FA, MD) (McCormick et al., 2023). GAMMs correlate observations obtained from the same participant equally and can model longitudinal data obtained at varying intervals and over different age ranges (McCormick et al., 2023). We used the following model to fit developmental trajectories of left and right standardized volume, FA, and MD:
gamm(Standardized Metric ∼ s(Age), method = “REML”, random = list(Participant = ∼1))
Male and female trajectories were fit separately. While directly testing interactions within one model would be ideal, this is currently not feasible within GAMMs. Ordered factor (by=) smooth interaction terms weight overall fit lines by all levels, meaning that female and male basis functions would be weighted using data from the opposite sex. Factor smooth (bs = "fs") interaction terms are designed to fit a large number of random smooths and would force female and male trajectories to have the same degree of wiggliness, which does not align with our hypotheses (Pederson et al., 2019). All GAMMs contained a smoothed age term and random effect term to account for longitudinal data. Each GAMM had a fixed overall intercept and a random intercept per participant. All volume models contained a covariate term for ICV, calculated by summing all 132 MaCRUISE regional volume values. ICV was included in each model to account for within-sex differences in head size. The basis function (k) of the s(age) term in each model was manually selected by starting at k = 4 and increasing k until the effective degrees of freedom stopped changing (Schoenig et al., 2023). Restricted maximum likelihood (REML) was used when fitting all models. For all trajectories, age ranges with significant changes were identified by calculating the 95 % confidence intervals of the first derivative of each GAMM trendline (R package stats) (R Core Team, 2023). Age ranges undergoing significant change were identified when the 95 % confidence intervals of the first derivative did not include zero (R package gratia version 0.8.1) (Jalbrzikowski et al., 2022b, Larsen et al., 2020, Simpson, 2018, Simpson, 2023). Two sample t-tests were used to test for sex differences between the average rate of change calculated within overlapping periods of significant change for each metric. False discovery rate correction at q < .05 was used to correct for 16 two-sample t-test rate of change comparisons.
A supplementary analysis was performed to examine sex differences in axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD) of the uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC tracts. Average AD and RD values were calculated for each tract in the left and right hemispheres of each image. GAMMs were rerun with AD and RD as dependent variables. AD and RD rates of change and periods of significant change were calculated.
3. Results
Males and females did not differ in demographic characteristics (Table 1). Fig. 3 depicts the standardized volume, FA, and MD trajectories, rates of change, and periods of significant development for females and males. GAMM model summary information and average rate of change comparison results are described in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.
Fig. 3.
Amygdala and prefrontal cortex (middle frontal gyrus (MFG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), frontal pole (FP), orbital frontal cortex (OFC)) volume and uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC tract fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) trajectories in a) female left hemisphere, b) female right hemisphere, c) male left hemisphere, and d) right male hemisphere). Combined z-score trajectories with 95 % confidence intervals are shown. Coloured bars reflect metric rates of change (z-score/year; blue=decrease, red=increase); white portions represent periods when significant change did not occur. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
3.1. Relative to males, females show less amygdala volume development
Females showed no significant age-related changes in left amygdala volume, and increases in right amygdala volume only between 6.5 and 8.7 years (Fig. 3). Males showed significant age-related increases in left amygdala volume between 6.3 and 9.4 years, and in right amygdala volume between 2.0 and 4.1 years and 6.6–8.7 years. For right amygdala volume, females had a significantly faster rate of change (0.211 z-score/year) than males (0.191 z-score/year) (p = .005, q =.008).
3.2. Relative to males, females exhibit shorter periods of significant PFC development
Females exhibited significant age-related decreases in left and right middle frontal gyrus volume between 6.1 and 15.1 years and 6.9–11.1 years, respectively, whereas males exhibited decreases between 6.4 and 16.0 years and 6.5–15.6 years, respectively (Fig. 3). Females (left = −0.093 z-score/year; right = −0.100 z-score/year) demonstrated significantly faster decreases in both left and right middle frontal gyrus volume than males (left = −0.078 z-score/year; right = −0.086 z-score/year) (left, p < .001, q <.001; right, p < .001, q <.001).
Females exhibited significant age-related decreases in left and right inferior frontal gyrus volume between 6.6 and 11.9 years and 7.9–12.6 years, respectively, while males showed decreases in left inferior frontal gyrus volume between 2.0 and 14.8 years. Males showed no significant age-related changes in right inferior frontal gyrus volume. Females (-0.071 z-score/year) had significantly faster decreases in left inferior frontal gyrus volume than males (-0.058 z-score/year) (p < .001, q <.001).
Females displayed significant age-related decreases in left and right orbital frontal cortex volume between 2.5 and 17.7 years and 14.0–17.7 years, respectively. Males exhibited significant decreases in left orbital frontal cortex volume between 2.0 and 6.7 years and 11.2–17.1 years, and in right orbital frontal cortex volume between 2.9 and 6.2 years and 12.1–16.8 years. Males (-0.106 z-score/year) demonstrated a significantly faster decrease in left orbital frontal cortex volume than females (-0.021 z-score/year) (p < .001, q <.001). Females (-0.136 z-score/year) had faster right orbital frontal cortex volume decreases than males (-0.111 z-score/year) (p < .001, q <.001).
Females showed significant age-related decreases in left and right frontal pole volume between 5.9 and 11.9 years and 6.2–10.0 years, respectively, whereas males exhibited decreases between 2.0 and 17.1 years and 6.0–17.1 years, respectively. Females (left = −0.091 z-score/year; right = −0.075 z-score/year) had significantly faster decreases in both left and right frontal pole volume than males (left = −0.046 z-score/year; right = −0.039 z-score/year) (left, p < .001, q <.001; right, p < .001, q <.001).
3.3. Relative to males, females show earlier amygdala-PFC white matter development
Females exhibited significant age-related increases in left and right uncinate fasciculus FA between 2.5 and 12.1 years and 2.5–8.0 years, respectively, while males showed increases between 2.0 and 15.6 years and 2.0–15.0 years, respectively (Fig. 3). Left uncinate fasciculus FA rates of change did not differ between females (0.223 z-score/year) and males (0.227 z-score/year) (p = .788, q =.788). Females (0.284 z-score/year) had significantly faster increases in right uncinate fasciculus FA than males (0.229 z-score/year) (p < .001, q <.001).
Females showed significant age-related decreases in left uncinate fasciculus MD between 2.5 and 8.0 years and 11.9–12.7 years, and in right uncinate fasciculus MD between 2.5 and 9.7 years. Males displayed decreases in left and right uncinate fasciculus MD decreases between 2.0 and 8.5 years and 2.0–8.9 years, respectively. Females (-0.421 z-score/year) demonstrated a significantly faster decrease in left uncinate fasciculus MD than males (-0.342 z-score/year) (p < .001, q <.001). Right uncinate fasciculus MD rates of change did not differ between females (-0.287 z-score/year) and males (-0.256 z-score/year; p = .014, q =.021).
Females demonstrated significant age-related increases in left and right amygdala-PFC FA between 2.5 and 10.2 years and 2.5–15.8 years, respectively, while males showed significant increases between 2.0 and 14.7 years and 2.0–14.3 years, respectively. Left and right amygdala-PFC tract FA rates of change did not differ between females (left = 0.208 z-score/year; right = 0.222 z-score/year) and males (0.205 z-score/year; right = 0.229 z-score/year) (left, p = .756, q =.788; right, p = .420, q =.480).
Females exhibited significant age-related decreases in left and right amygdala-PFC MD between 2.5 and 9.8 years and 2.5–14.1 years, respectively. Males showed significant decreases in left and right amygdala-PFC MD between 2.0 and 11.1 years and 2.0–10.0 years, respectively. Left and right amygdala-PFC tract MD rates of change did not differ between females (left = −0.249 z-score/year; right = −0.285 z-score/year) and males (-0.233 z-score/year; right = −0.272 z-score/year) (left, p = .103, q =.137; right, p = .211, q =.259).
3.4. Supplementary analyses
Females exhibited significant age-related decreases in left uncinate fasciculus AD between 2.6 and 7.5 years and increases between 9.2 and 10.0 years. Females also had right uncinate fasciculus AD decreases between 2.5 and 11.4 years. Males showed left and right uncinate AD decreases between 2.7 and 8.3 years and 2.0–9.9 years, respectively. Females showed significant age-related decreases in left uncinate fasciculus RD between 2.5 and 8.4 years and 11.7–12.7 years, and in right uncinate fasciculus RD between 2.5 and 8.9 years. Males displayed decreases in left uncinate fasciculus RD between 2.0 and 8.8 years and 11.5–14.2 years. Males also showed right uncinate RD decreases between 2.0 and 13.9 years.
Females demonstrated significant age-related decreases in left and right amygdala-PFC tract AD between 2.5 and 15.3 years and 2.5–17.7 years, respectively, while males showed significant decreases between 2.0 and 12.7 years and 4.2–5.6 years, respectively. Females exhibited significant age-related decreases in left and right amygdala-PFC tract RD between 2.5 and 17.7 years and 2.5–16.3 years, respectively. Males showed significant decreases in left and right amygdala-PFC tract RD between 2.0 and 15.7 years and 2.0–13.1 years, respectively (Supplementary Figure 1).
4. Discussion
In this large longitudinal study of typically developing children and adolescents, we show that the maturational timing of the amygdala and PFC proposed in the DMH holds in males but is less apparent in females. Females exhibit fewer and shorter periods of amygdala and PFC volume development than males. We also showed that amygdala-PFC white matter microstructure development ends earlier in females than in males. Our findings have implications for understanding behavioural differences between females and males across childhood and adolescence.
Our work illustrates two mismatches, or differences, in maturational timing: one between amygdala and PFC volumes and another between grey matter volumes and amygdala-PFC white matter microstructure. Regardless of sex, we observed amygdala volume increases until late childhood and PFC volume decreases through adolescence. These trends align with the DMH, showing that the amygdala reaches a developmental plateau before the PFC in typically developing individuals. Our findings align with previous work demonstrating amygdala volume increases in childhood (Alex et al., 2024, Dima et al., 2021, Russell et al., 2021, Uematsu et al., 2012) and PFC volume decreases into adolescence and adulthood (Amlien et al., 2016, Bethlehem et al., 2022, Brain Development Cooperative Group, 2012, Brown and Jernigan, 2012, Lenroot et al., 2007, Mills et al., 2014, Mills et al., 2014, Sowell et al., 1999). Although macrostructural measures like volume and microstructural processes are difficult to link in living humans, age-related subcortical volume increases are thought to be related to synaptogenesis, neuronal proliferation and migration, which preclinical models have shown to dominate early life and form new connections in the brain (Stiles and Jernigan, 2010). Age-related cortical volume decreases are associated with synaptic and neuronal pruning and dendritic reorganization, which increase in adolescence in preclinical models and refine and strengthen neuronal connections (Kolk and Rakic, 2022, Markham et al., 2007). Future studies using methods that evaluate cortical microstructure can disentangle how grey matter architecture changes relate to volume growth. In both sexes, uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC tract FA increased and MD decreased, changing rapidly in early childhood, more gradually in middle childhood to early adolescence, and beginning to plateau in middle to late adolescence. Our findings suggest that the uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC tracts have similar patterns of maturational timing and are not fully matured by the start of adolescence. Age-related white matter microstructure changes are attributed to myelination and axonal packing, which are prolonged processes (Lebel and Deoni, 2018). Our findings align with previous evidence that tracts projecting to the frontal lobe have particularly prolonged trajectories (Asato et al., 2010, Chen et al., 2016, Lebel et al., 2012, Lebel et al., 2008, Lebel and Beaulieu, 2011, Lynch et al., 2020, Simmonds et al., 2014). However, we did not observe significant changes in FA and MD between 16 and 18 years of age, in contrast to previous work showing changes in uncinate fasciculus microstructure past 25 years of age (Asato et al., 2010, Chen et al., 2016, Jáni et al., 2024, Lebel et al., 2012, Lebel et al., 2008, Simmonds et al., 2014). Narrower windows of change may reflect flatter trajectories at older ages due to sparser data or methodological differences; we identified periods of significant change statistically, while previous work has relied on qualitative descriptions of overall trends and percent change. As previous literature suggests that PFC subregions (Amlien et al., 2016, Bethlehem et al., 2022) and white matter tracts, including the uncinate fasciculus (Asato et al., 2010, Chen et al., 2016, Jáni et al., 2024, Lebel et al., 2012, Lebel et al., 2008, Simmonds et al., 2014) develop into the third decade of life, mismatches in maturational timing may persist longer than shown here. Future studies with broader aged samples can apply our methods to elucidate if and how these structures continue changing.
We found sex differences in model wiggliness and maturational timing, with the developmental mismatch being more apparent in males than females. While males showed significant left amygdala growth from middle to late childhood and right amygdala growth from early to late childhood, females displayed no significant left amygdala volume changes and right amygdala growth only from middle childhood until late childhood. These findings support previous reports of amygdala trajectory lateralization showing earlier and more protracted changes in the right amygdala than the left amygdala (Russell et al., 2021, Uematsu et al., 2012). Our findings are similar to previous work showing that females undergo fewer amygdala volume changes than males (Goddings et al., 2014). Previous research evaluating sex differences in trajectory peaks has reported that female amygdala volumes peak before males (Goddings et al., 2014, Uematsu et al., 2012). However, our findings suggest that female and male amygdala volumes begin stabilizing around the same time (∼8–9 years). Compared to males, females exhibited shorter periods of PFC volume development that ended earlier than males. Males showed significant PFC volume development from early childhood until late adolescence. Female PFC volumes began significantly changing in middle to late childhood and stopped by early to middle adolescence. The PFC maturational timing we observed in males is more similar to prior work in combined female and male samples, showing PFC volume changes into adulthood (Amlien et al., 2016, Brown and Jernigan, 2012, Mills et al., 2014, Mills et al., 2014, Sowell et al., 1999). Less female representation (∼30–43 % female) in prior studies may explain why the trajectories of some combined samples are skewed toward the maturational timing of males (Mills et al., 2014, Mills et al., 2014). Even in studies with equal female and male representation (∼46–53 % female), averaged findings across sexes may have obscured sex-specific patterns (Amlien et al., 2016, Brown and Jernigan, 2012, Sowell et al., 1999). Our observation of earlier PFC maturation in females aligns with work that examined females and males separately (Brain Development Cooperative Group, 2012, Frere et al., 2020, Lenroot et al., 2007, Raznahan et al., 2010, Remer et al., 2017). While a developmental mismatch was still observed in females, the difference between the endpoints of significant amygdala and PFC development was smaller in females than in males, indicating a less pronounced mismatch. Interestingly, in males, frontal pole and orbital frontal cortex volumes continued to undergo significant change until the end of our sample’s age range, past when the middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus stopped changing. With the exception of right orbital frontal cortex volume, this trend was not seen in females. These results suggest that males have amygdala-frontal pole and amygdala-orbital frontal cortex mismatches that are particularly large compared to their female counterparts. Given the orbital frontal cortex and frontal poles’ critical role in emotion and reward processing and future planning, prolonged development in these areas in males may have behavioural implications (Bludau et al., 2014, Dixon et al., 2017). Our work highlights the importance of considering sex-specific trajectories in developmental studies.
In both sexes, the uncinate fasciculus and amygdala-PFC tracts changed rapidly in early childhood and gradually from middle childhood to middle adolescence. While early changes were similar between sexes, females stopped exhibiting significant changes in left and right uncinate fasciculus FA 3.5–7 years before males. In contrast, females stopped the bulk of significant change in left uncinate fasciculus MD only 0.5 years before males and 0.8 years after males in right uncinate fasciculus MD. Our FA findings complement research reporting flatter profiles of uncinate fasciculus development in female versus male adolescents, suggesting earlier white matter maturation in females (Geeraert et al., 2019, Asato et al., 2010, Clayden et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2012). These findings are echoed by other work showing that FA and MD values peak in females before males (Chen et al., 2016). Our findings contrast with other studies that reported no sex differences in uncinate fasciculus trajectories, however, two of these studies used cross-sectional data and the other four longitudinal studies only examined 221–322 scans, compared to our 606 scan sessions (Krogsrud et al., 2016, Lebel et al., 2012, Lebel et al., 2008, Lebel and Beaulieu, 2011, Muftuler et al., 2012, Simmonds et al., 2014). While both FA and MD are sensitive to changes in myelination, axon density, and fibre coherence (Lebel et al., 2019), some research suggests that FA is more closely related to changes in myelination (Chang et al., 2017), while MD is more closely related to changes in neurite density (Genc et al., 2017). Our FA findings may suggest greater sex differences in uncinate fasciculus myelination. Aligning with this, our supplementary analyses revealed that right uncinate fasciculus RD in males stopped significantly changing 5 years after females. While RD is speculated to be more sensitive to myelination than FA and AD (Goddings et al., 2021), previous work has also linked RD with axonal density differences (Klawiter et al., 2011). Additional investigations using more specific measures are needed to disentangle which biological factors drive the differences observed here. More protracted development in males was also seen in the left amygdala-PFC tract, where FA and MD changed for 4.5 and 1.3 years longer, respectively, in males than in females. However, right amygdala-PFC tract FA and MD changed for 1.5 and 4.1 years longer, respectively, in females than in males. Lateralized sex differences in amygdala-PFC tract maturation may reflect asymmetrical sensitivities to sexually dimorphic factors like hormones or functional differences. For example, prior lesion work has shown that left hemisphere lesions in females cause greater impairments in emotional processing and impulsivity than right-sided lesions, while the opposite trend is seen in males (Sutterer et al., 2015, Tranel et al., 2005). In females, the right amygdala-PFC tract may be less involved in these behaviours than the left tract, resulting in more protracted development that supports other functions (Sutterer et al., 2015, Tranel et al., 2005). Further research is needed to understand the role of the amygdala-PFC tract in cognition and behaviour and the implications of sex differences.
Amygdala, PFC, and amygdala-PFC white matter mismatches may underlie sensation-seeking behaviour changes. Amygdala (Blair et al., 1999, Guyer et al., 2008, Phan et al., 2002, Schneider et al., 1997, Sergerie et al., 2008, Simpson et al., 2000, William et al., 2012) and PFC subregion (Bramson et al., 2020, Collette et al., 2001, Dong et al., 2022, Grecucci et al., 2013, Hampshire et al., 2010, Hartwigsen et al., 2019, Martín-Luengo et al., 2023, Martins et al., 2021, O’Doherty et al., 2001, Tyborowska et al., 2016, Volman et al., 2011) functional activation have been shown to influence sensation-seeking behaviours. Amygdala-PFC structural connectivity also modulates amygdala and PFC functional activation (Goetschius et al., 2019, Swartz et al., 2014) and sensation-seeking behaviours (Goldwaser et al., 2022, Ikuta et al., 2018, Rashidi et al., 2024). Sensation-seeking behaviours increase throughout childhood, peak in middle adolescence, and decline in adulthood (Harden and Tucker-Drob, 2011, Haas et al., 2019, Lydon-Staley and Geier, 2018, Romer et al., 2010, Shulman et al., 2015, Steinberg, 2008, Steinberg et al., 2018). Amygdala maturation in early to late childhood may promote early life sensation-seeking tendencies. Sensation-seeking behaviours may peak in adolescence because amygdala excitation continues without adult-like inhibitory signalling from slower to mature PFC regions. The prolonged maturation of amygdala-PFC white matter connections may contribute to an excitation-inhibition imbalance in adolescence by limiting communication between the amygdala and PFC. Sensation-seeking behaviours may decline and plateau in adulthood when the amygdala, PFC, and their connecting tracts have matured. Future work relating regional maturational timing patterns and sensation-seeking behaviour trajectories could clarify these relationships. It is also worth noting that while the amygdala is most commonly implicated in the DMH, other limbic structures may also play a role. Prior work has found that, on the participant level, the maturational timing of the nucleus accumbens and PFC was mismatched, but only in half of participants (Mills et al., 2014a). Nucleus accumbens and amygdala maturation was mismatched more regularly (Mills et al., 2014a). Exploring the DMH in other limbic structures and PFC subregions may reveal new relationships important for sensation-seeking behaviour.
Our findings may also help explain sex differences in sensation-seeking behaviours. The early plateauing of PFC volume in females suggests that PFC regions with amygdala connections mature earlier in females than in males. Early PFC maturation is associated with more adult-like functional activation capabilities (Kolk and Rakic, 2022). Throughout adolescence, the female PFC may produce more inhibitory signals during elevated emotion and reward processing than males, achieving an excitation-inhibition balance that results in early reductions in sensation-seeking behaviours (Shulman et al., 2015). Our findings indicate that amygdala-PFC white matter development ends earlier in females than in males. Increased myelination of structural connections has been associated with lower excitation/inhibition ratios and stronger functional connectivity in adults (Fotiadis et al., 2023). Earlier-developing females with more mature white matter microstructure may experience more effective amygdala-PFC communication than males, facilitating earlier reductions in sensation-seeking behaviours (Shulman et al., 2015).
Changing sex hormones may underlie sex differences in trajectories. Developing females and males experience surges in estradiol and testosterone, respectively, between 0 and 5 months (Andersson et al., 1998, Bidlingmaier et al., 1987). Infant MRI studies have reported faster growth in total brain volume in males than females (Villa et al., 2021) and sex differences in anterior cingulate gyrus and superior temporal gyrus volume trajectories (Khan et al., 2024). Early life hormone fluxes are one potential explanation for these infant sex differences (Khan et al., 2024, Villa et al., 2021). Females and males undergo another surge in sex hormones during puberty, between 8 and 14 years of age (Breehl and Caban, 2024). Pubertal amygdala and PFC volume and white matter tract FA and MD changes have been associated with estradiol and testosterone levels, illustrating a relationship between sex hormones and brain sexual dimorphism (Herting et al., 2014, Ho et al., 2020, Koolschijn et al., 2014, Menzies et al., 2014, Neufang et al., 2009, Vijayakumar et al., 2021). Estradiol and testosterone have also been negatively and positively, respectively, associated with self-reported sensation-seeking behaviours in 13–20 year olds (Harden et al., 2017). Further research is required to fully understand the neurobiological effects of sex hormone changes on brain development patterns and sensation-seeking behaviour.
Our sample is predominantly white, high-income, and highly educated. Because maternal education and household income have been associated with brain differences (Hair et al., 2022, Stephens et al., 2020, Zhu et al., 2023), our findings may not generalize to other sociodemographic contexts. Second, our sample was unevenly distributed across the age span, with more participants aged 2–13 years. Having fewer participants at older ages may result in less accurate representations of average population changes; larger samples are required to confirm. Lastly, we did not have measures of pubertal status or sensation-seeking behaviour, which would have strengthened the study. Future studies considering pubertal status and specific behaviours relating to the DMH will provide a more robust explanation of sex differences in developmental timing.
5. Conclusion
Our study found earlier amygdala development in childhood and later PFC development into adolescence. We saw that amygdala and PFC macrostructure and amygdala-PFC white matter microstructure maturational timing was mismatched. Our findings stand apart from previous DMH work by showing that the maturational timing discussed in the DMH is present in males and less apparent in females. Females undergo fewer and shorter periods of significant amygdala and PFC macrostructure change than males. Females also exhibited earlier amygdala-PFC white matter microstructure development than males. Together, these findings suggest that the amygdala-PFC neural system matures earlier in females than in males. Our large longitudinal study reveals nuances in how developmental mismatches manifest between grey and white matter and females and males, which may explain differences in the timing of behaviour development.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Ghasoub Mohammad: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation. Yeates Keith Owen: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation. Lebel Catherine: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Roeske Jamie: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Long Xiangyu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization. Perdue Meaghan V: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. Long Madison: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation. Geeraert Bryce: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Data curation.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant numbers IHD-134090, MOP-136797, PJT-162217, FDN-143304), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and funds from the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI) and Alberta Children’s Hospital Foundation. JR receives salary from NSERC, the Province of Alberta, and ACHRI. CL receives salary support from the Canada Research Chairs Program.
Footnotes
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101568.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary material
Data availability
A portion of the neuroimaging data used in this study are freely available through the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/axz5r/, or the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform: https://portal.conp.ca/dataset?id=projects/AdolescentBrainDevelopment. For more information, see Reynolds et al., (2020) and Geeraert et al., (2020). Other data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
- Alex A.M., Aguate F., Botteron K., Buss C., Chong Y.-S., Dager S.R., Donald K.A., Entringer S., Fair D.A., Fortier M.V., Gaab N., Gilmore J.H., Girault J.B., Graham A.M., Groenewold N.A., Hazlett H., Lin W., Meaney M.J., Piven J., Knickmeyer R.C. A global multicohort study to map subcortical brain development and cognition in infancy and early childhood. Nat. Neurosci. 2024;27(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01501-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amlien I.K., Fjell A.M., Tamnes C.K., Grydeland H., Krogsrud S.K., Chaplin T.A., Rosa M.G.P., Walhovd K.B. Organizing Principles of Human Cortical Development—Thickness and Area from 4 to 30 Years: insights from Comparative Primate Neuroanatomy. Cereb. Cortex. 2016;26(1):257–267. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andersson A.M., Toppari J., Haavisto A.M., Petersen J.H., Simell T., Simell O., Skakkebaek N.E. Longitudinal reproductive hormone profiles in infants: peak of inhibin B levels in infant boys exceeds levels in adult men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;83(2):675–681. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.2.4603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asato M.R., Terwilliger R., Woo J., Luna B. White matter development in adolescence: A DTI study. Cereb. Cortex (N. Y., NY) 2010;20(9):2122. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bethlehem R.A.I., Seidlitz J., White S.R., Vogel J.W., Anderson K.M., Adamson C., Adler S., Alexopoulos G.S., Anagnostou E., Areces-Gonzalez A., Astle D.E., Auyeung B., Ayub M., Bae J., Ball G., Baron-Cohen S., Beare R., Bedford S.A., Benegal V., Alexander-Bloch A.F. Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature. 2022;604(7906):525–533. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04554-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bidlingmaier F., Strom T.M., Dörr H.G., Eisenmenger W., Knorr D. Estrone and estradiol concentrations in human ovaries, testes, and adrenals during the first two years of life. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987;65(5):862–867. doi: 10.1210/jcem-65-5-862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blair R.J.R., Morris J.S., Frith C.D., Perrett D.I., Dolan R.J. Dissociable neural responses to facial expressions of sadness and anger. Brain. 1999;122(5):883–893. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.5.883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bludau S., Eickhoff S.B., Mohlberg H., Caspers S., Laird A.R., Fox P.T., Schleicher A., Zilles K., Amunts K. Cytoarchitecture, probability maps and functions of the human frontal pole. NeuroImage. 2014;93(Pt 2):260–275. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brain Development Cooperative Group Total and Regional Brain Volumes in a Population-Based Normative Sample from 4 to 18 Years: the NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain Development. Cereb. Cortex (N. Y., NY) 2012;22(1):1–12. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bramson B., Folloni D., Verhagen L., Hartogsveld B., Mars R.B., Toni I., Roelofs K. Human lateral frontal pole contributes to control over emotional approach–avoidance actions. J. Neurosci. 2020;40(14):2925–2934. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2048-19.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breehl L., Caban O. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Physiology, puberty.〈http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534827/〉 [Google Scholar]
- Brown T.T., Jernigan T.L. Brain development during the preschool years. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2012;22(4):313–333. doi: 10.1007/s11065-012-9214-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casey B.J., Getz S., Galvan A. The adolescent brain. Dev. Rev. DR. 2008;28(1):62. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang E.H., Argyelan M., Aggarwal M., Chandon T.-S.S., Karlsgodt K.H., Mori S., Malhotra A.K. The role of myelination in measures of white matter integrity: combination of diffusion tensor imaging and two-photon microscopy of CLARITY intact brains. NeuroImage. 2017;147:253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z., Zhang H., Yushkevich P.A., Liu M., Beaulieu C. Maturation along white matter tracts in human brain using a diffusion tensor surface model tract-specific analysis. Front. Neuroanat. 2016;10 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clayden J.D., Jentschke S., Muñoz M., Cooper J.M., Chadwick M.J., Banks T., Clark C.A., Vargha-Khadem F. Normative development of white matter tracts: similarities and differences in relation to age, gender, and intelligence. Cereb. Cortex. 2012;22(8):1738–1747. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collette F., Van der Linden M., Delfiore G., Degueldre C., Luxen A., Salmon E. The functional anatomy of inhibition processes investigated with the hayling task. NeuroImage. 2001;14(2):258–267. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox R.W. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res., Int. J. 1996;29(3):162–173. doi: 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dima D., Modabbernia A., Papachristou E., Doucet G.E., Agartz I., Aghajani M., Akudjedu T.N., Albajes-Eizagirre A., Alnæs D., Alpert K.I., Andersson M., Andreasen N.C., Andreassen O.A., Asherson P., Banaschewski T., Bargallo N., Baumeister S., Baur-Streubel R., Bertolino A., Frangou S. Subcortical volumes across the lifespan: data from 18,605 healthy individuals aged 3–90 years. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2021;43(1):452–469. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon M.L., Thiruchselvam R., Todd R., Christoff K. Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: An integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 2017;143(10):1033–1081. doi: 10.1037/bul0000096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dong W., Luo J., Huo H., Seger C.A., Chen Q. Frontostriatal functional connectivity underlies the association between punishment sensitivity and procrastination. Brain Sci. 2022;12(9):1163. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ebeling U., von Cramon D. Topography of the uncinate fascicle and adjacent temporal fiber tracts. Acta Neurochir. 1992;115(3–4):143–148. doi: 10.1007/BF01406373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eden A.S., Schreiber J., Anwander A., Keuper K., Laeger I., Zwanzger P., Zwitserlood P., Kugel H., Dobel C. Emotion regulation and trait anxiety are predicted by the microstructure of fibers between amygdala and prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2015;35(15):6020–6027. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3659-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ernst M., Nelson E.E., Jazbec S., McClure E.B., Monk C.S., Leibenluft E., Blair J., Pine D.S. Amygdala and nucleus accumbens in responses to receipt and omission of gains in adults and adolescents. NeuroImage. 2005;25(4):1279–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fields R.D. Change in the brain’s white matter. Sci. (N. Y., N. Y. ) 2010;330(6005):768–769. doi: 10.1126/science.1199139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fortin J.-P., Cullen N., Sheline Y.I., Taylor W.D., Aselcioglu I., Cook P.A., Adams P., Cooper C., Fava M., McGrath P.J., McInnis M., Phillips M.L., Trivedi M.H., Weissman M.M., Shinohara R.T. Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites. NeuroImage. 2018;167:104–120. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fortin J.-P., Parker D., Tunç B., Watanabe T., Elliott M.A., Ruparel K., Roalf D.R., Satterthwaite T.D., Gur R.C., Gur R.E., Schultz R.T., Verma R., Shinohara R.T. Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data. NeuroImage. 2017;161:149–170. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fotiadis P., Cieslak M., He X., Caciagli L., Ouellet M., Satterthwaite T.D., Shinohara R.T., Bassett D.S. Myelination and excitation-inhibition balance synergistically shape structure-function coupling across the human cortex. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:6115. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41686-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frere P.B., Vetter N.C., Artiges E., Filippi I., Miranda R., Vulser H., Paillère-Martinot M.-L., Ziesch V., Conrod P., Cattrell A., Walter H., Gallinat J., Bromberg U., Jurk S., Menningen E., Frouin V., Papadopoulos Orfanos D., Stringaris A., Penttilä J.…Lemaître H. Sex effects on structural maturation of the limbic system and outcomes on emotional regulation during adolescence. NeuroImage. 2020;210 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galvan A., Hare T.A., Parra C.E., Penn J., Voss H., Glover G., Casey B.J. Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2006;26(25):6885–6892. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1062-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galván, A. (2010). Adolescent development of the reward system. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 4. 10.3389/neuro.09.006.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Geeraert B.L., Chamberland M., Lebel R.M., Lebel C. Multimodal principal component analysis to identify major features of white matter structure and links to reading. PloS One. 2020;15(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geeraert B.L., Lebel R.M., Lebel C. A multiparametric analysis of white matter maturation during late childhood and adolescence. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019;40(15):4345–4356. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geier C.F., Terwilliger R., Teslovich T., Velanova K., Luna B. Immaturities in reward processing and its influence on inhibitory control in adolescence. Cereb. Cortex. 2010;20(7):1613–1629. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genc S., Malpas C.B., Holland S.K., Beare R., Silk T.J. Neurite density index is sensitive to age related differences in the developing brain. NeuroImage. 2017;148:373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giedd J.N., Blumenthal J., Jeffries N.O., Castellanos F.X., Liu H., Zijdenbos A., Paus T., Evans A.C., Rapoport J.L. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat. Neurosci. 1999;2(10):861–863. doi: 10.1038/13158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goddings A.-L., Mills K.L., Clasen L.S., Giedd J.N., Viner R.M., Blakemore S.-J. The influence of puberty on subcortical brain development. Neuroimage. 2014;88:242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goddings A.-L., Roalf D., Lebel C., Tamnes C.K. Development of white matter microstructure and executive functions during childhood and adolescence: a review of diffusion MRI studies. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2021;51 doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goetschius L.G., Hein T.C., Mattson W.I., Lopez-Duran N., Dotterer H.L., Welsh R.C., Mitchell C., Hyde L.W., Monk C.S. Amygdala-prefrontal cortex white matter tracts are widespread, variable and implicated in amygdala modulation in adolescents. NeuroImage. 2019;191:278–291. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldwaser E.L., Du X., Adhikari B.M., Kvarta M., Chiappelli J., Hare S., Marshall W., Savransky A., Carino K., Bruce H., Acheson A., Kochunov P., Hong L.E. Role of white matter microstructure in impulsive behavior. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2022;34(3):254–260. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.21070167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grecucci A., Giorgetta C., Bonini N., Sanfey A.G. Reappraising social emotions: the role of inferior frontal gyrus, temporo-parietal junction and insula in interpersonal emotion regulation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013;7:523. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greening S.G., Mitchell D.G.V. A network of amygdala connections predict individual differences in trait anxiety. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2015;36(12):4819–4830. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guyer A.E., Monk C.S., McClure-Tone E.B., Nelson E.E., Roberson-Nay R., Adler A.D., Fromm S.J., Leibenluft E., Pine D.S., Ernst M. A developmental examination of amygdala response to facial expressions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008;20(9):1565. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haas M., Hiemisch A., Vogel M., Wagner O., Kiess W., Poulain T. Sensation seeking in 3- to 6-year-old children: associations with socio-demographic parameters and behavioural difficulties. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1450-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hair N.L., Hanson J.L., Wolfe B.L., Pollak S.D. Low household income and neurodevelopment from infancy through adolescence. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hampshire A., Chamberlain S.R., Monti M.M., Duncan J., Owen A.M. The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control. Neuroimage. 2010;50(3–3):1313–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen C., Nath V., Hainline A.E., Schilling K.G., Parvathaneni P., Bayrak R.G., Blaber J.A., Irfanoglu O., Pierpaoli C., Anderson A.W., Rogers B.P., Landman B.A. Characterization and correlation of signal drift in diffusion weighted MRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2018;57:133. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harden K.P., Mann F.D., Grotzinger A., Patterson M.W., Steinberg L., Tackett J.L., Tucker-Drob E.M. Developmental differences in reward sensitivity and sensation seeking in adolescence: testing sex-specific associations with gonadal hormones and pubertal development. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2017;115(1):161. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harden K.P., Tucker-Drob E.M. Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: further evidence for a dual systems model. Dev. Psychol. 2011;47(3):739–746. doi: 10.1037/a0023279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartwigsen G., Neef N.E., Camilleri J.A., Margulies D.S., Eickhoff S.B. Functional segregation of the right inferior frontal gyrus: evidence from coactivation-based parcellation. Cereb. Cortex. 2019;29(4):1532–1546. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hay, R., Reynolds, J., & Lebel, C. (2019). White Matter Tractography Guide: Amygdala Pathway, 19922542 Bytes, Graphic, figshare. 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7865186.V1. [DOI]
- Herting M.M., Gautam P., Spielberg J.M., Kan E., Dahl R.E., Sowell E.R. The role of testosterone and estradiol in brain volume changes across adolescence: a longitudinal structural MRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014;35(11):5633–5645. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ho T.C., Colich N.L., Sisk L.M., Oskirko K., Jo B., Gotlib I.H. Sex differences in the effects of gonadal hormones on white matter microstructure development in adolescence. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2020;42 doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horga G., Kaur T., Peterson B.S. Annual Research Review: Current limitations and future directions in MRI studies of child- and adult-onset developmental psychopathologies. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2014;55(6):659–680. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huo Y., Plassard A.J., Carass A., Resnick S.M., Pham D.L., Prince J.L., Landman B.A. Consistent cortical reconstruction and multi-atlas brain segmentation. NeuroImage. 2016;138:197–210. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huo Y., Carass A., Resnick S.M., Pham D.L., Prince J.L., Landman B.A. Combining multi-atlas segmentation with brain surface estimation. Proc. SPIE-- Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2016;9784 doi: 10.1117/12.2216604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikuta T., del Arco A., Karlsgodt K.H. White matter integrity in the fronto-striatal accumbofrontal tract predicts impulsivity. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018;12(5):1524–1528. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9820-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jalbrzikowski M., Lin A., Vajdi A., Grigoryan V., Kushan L., Ching C.R.K., Schleifer C., Hayes R.A., Chu S.A., Sugar C.A., Forsyth J.K., Bearden C.E. Longitudinal trajectories of cortical development in 22q11.2 copy number variants and typically developing controls. Mol. Psychiatry. 2022;27(10):4181–4190. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01681-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jáni M., Mareček R., Mareckova K. Development of white matter in young adulthood: the speed of brain aging and its relationship with changes in fractional anisotropy. NeuroImage. 2024;301 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson W.E., Li C., Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8(1):118–127. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly C.E., Thompson D.K., Adamson C.L., Ball G., Dhollander T., Beare R., Matthews L.G., Alexander B., Cheong J.L.Y., Doyle L.W., Anderson P.J., Inder T.E. Cortical growth from infancy to adolescence in preterm and term-born children. Brain. 2024;147(4):1526–1538. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan Y.T., Tsompanidis A., Radecki M.A., Dorfschmidt L., Consortium A., Austin T., Suckling J., Allison C., Lai M.-C., Bethlehem R.A.I., Baron-Cohen S. Sex differences in human brain structure at birth. Biol. Sex. Differ. 2024;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s13293-024-00657-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kier E.L., Staib L.H., Davis L.M., Bronen R.A. MR imaging of the temporal stem: anatomic dissection tractography of the uncinate fasciculus, inferior occipitofrontal fasciculus, and meyer’s loop of the optic radiation. AJNR: Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004;25(5):677. 〈https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7974480/〉 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kierońska S., Sokal P., Dura M., Jabłońska M., Rudaś M., Jabłońska R. Tractography-based analysis of morphological and anatomical characteristics of the uncinate fasciculus in human brains. Brain Sci. 2020;10(10):709. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim M.J., Whalen P.J. The structural integrity of an amygdala–prefrontal pathway predicts trait anxiety. J. Neurosci. 2009;29(37):11614–11618. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2335-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klawiter E.C., Schmidt R.E., Trinkaus K., Liang H.-F., Budde M.D., Naismith R.T., Song S.-K., Cross A.H., Benzinger T.L. Radial diffusivity predicts demyelination in ex-vivo multiple sclerosis spinal cords. NeuroImage. 2011;55(4):1454–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klein A., Tourville J. 101 Labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol. Front. Neurosci. 2012;6:171. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolk S.M., Rakic P. Development of prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01137-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konrad K., Firk C., Uhlhaas P.J. Brain development during adolescence: neuroscientific insights into this developmental period. Dtsch. Ärzteblatt Int. 2013;110(25):425. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koolschijn P.C.M.P., Crone E.A. Sex differences and structural brain maturation from childhood to early adulthood. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013;5:106–118. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koolschijn P.C.M.P., Peper J.S., Crone E.A. The influence of sex steroids on structural brain maturation in adolescence. Plos One. 2014;9(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krogsrud S.K., Fjell A.M., Tamnes C.K., Grydeland H., Mork L., Due-Tønnessen P., Bjørnerud A., Sampaio-Baptista C., Andersson J., Johansen-Berg H., Walhovd K.B. Changes in white matter microstructure in the developing brain—A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of children from 4 to 11 years of age. Neuroimage. 2016;124(Pt A):473–486. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsen B., Bourque J., Moore T.M., Adebimpe A., Calkins M.E., Elliott M.A., Gur R.C., Gur R.E., Moberg P.J., Roalf D.R., Ruparel K., Turetsky B.I., Vandekar S.N., Wolf D.H., Shinohara R.T., Satterthwaite T.D. Longitudinal development of brain iron is linked to cognition in youth. J. Neurosci. 2020;40(9):1810–1818. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2434-19.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebel C., Beaulieu C. Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood. J. Neurosci. 2011;31(30):10937–10947. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5302-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebel C., Deoni S. The development of brain white matter microstructure. NeuroImage. 2018;182:207–218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebel C., Gee M., Camicioli R., Wieler M., Martin W., Beaulieu C. Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract evolution over the lifespan. NeuroImage. 2012;60(1):340–352. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebel C., Walker L., Leemans A., Phillips L., Beaulieu C. Microstructural maturation of the human brain from childhood to adulthood. NeuroImage. 2008;40(3):1044–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebel C., Treit S., Beaulieu C. A review of diffusion MRI of typical white matter development from early childhood to young adulthood. NMR Biomed. 2019;32(4) doi: 10.1002/nbm.3778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lebel C.A., Gibbard W.B., Tortorelli C., Pei J., Beaulieu C., Bagshawe M., McMorris C.A. Prenatal Exposure And Child brain and mental Health (PEACH) study: protocol for a cohort study of children and youth with prenatal alcohol exposure. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leemans A., Jeurissen B., Sijbers J., Jones D. ExploreDTI: a Graphical Toolbox for Processing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Diffusion MR Data. 2009:3537. [Google Scholar]
- Lenroot R.K., Gogtay N., Greenstein D.K., Wells E.M., Wallace G.L., Clasen L.S., Blumenthal J.D., Lerch J., Zijdenbos A.P., Evans A.C., Thompson P.M., Giedd J.N. Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage. 2007;36(4):1065–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Long M., Ostertag C., Reynolds J.E., Zheng J., Landman B., Huo Y., Forkert N.D., Lebel C. Few sex differences in regional gray matter volume growth trajectories across early childhood. Imaging Neurosci. 2024;2:1–26. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lydon-Staley D.M., Geier C.F. Age-varying associations between cigarette smoking, sensation seeking, and impulse control through adolescence and young adulthood. J. Res. Adolesc. Off. J. Soc. Res. Adolesc. 2018;28(2):354–367. doi: 10.1111/jora.12335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch K.M., Cabeen R.P., Toga A.W., Clark K.A. Magnitude and timing of major white matter tract maturation from infancy through adolescence with NODDI. NeuroImage. 2020;212 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markham J.A., Morris J.R., Juraska J.M. Neuron number decreases in the rat ventral, but not dorsal, medial prefrontal cortex between adolescence and adulthood. Neuroscience. 2007;144(3):961–968. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martín-Luengo B., Vorobiova A.N., Feurra M., Myachykov A., Shtyrov Y. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left middle frontal gyrus modulates the information people communicate in different social contexts. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):9995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36192-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martins D., Rademacher L., Gabay A.S., Taylor R., Richey J.A., Smith D.V., Goerlich K.S., Nawijn L., Cremers H.R., Wilson R., Bhattacharyya S., Paloyelis Y. Mapping social reward and punishment processing in the human brain: A voxel-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging findings using the social incentive delay task. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021;122:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormick E.M., Byrne M.L., Flournoy J.C., Mills K.L., Pfeifer J.H. The Hitchhiker’s guide to longitudinal models: a primer on model selection for repeated-measures methods. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2023;63 doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menzies L., Goddings A.-L., Whitaker K.J., Blakemore S.-J., Viner R.M. The effects of puberty on white matter development in boys. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2014;11:116. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mills K.L., Goddings A.-L., Clasen L.S., Giedd J.N., Blakemore S.-J. The developmental mismatch in structural brain maturation during adolescence. Dev. Neurosci. 2014;36(3–4):147–160. doi: 10.1159/000362328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mills K.L., Lalonde F., Clasen L.S., Giedd J.N., Blakemore S.-J. Developmental changes in the structure of the social brain in late childhood and adolescence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2014;9(1):123–131. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muftuler L.T., Davis E.P., Buss C., Solodkin A., Su M.Y., Head K.M., Hasso A.N., Sandman C.A. Development of white matter pathways in typically developing preadolescent children. Brain Res. 2012;1466:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neufang S., Specht K., Hausmann M., Güntürkün O., Herpertz-Dahlmann B., Fink G.R., Konrad K. Sex differences and the impact of steroid hormones on the developing human brain. Cereb. Cortex. 2009;19(2):464–473. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NiftyReg—CMIC. (2019). 〈http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/NiftyReg〉.
- O’Doherty J., Kringelbach M.L., Rolls E.T., Hornak J., Andrews C. Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2001;4(1):95–102. doi: 10.1038/82959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onicas A.I., Ware A.L., Harris A.D., Beauchamp M.H., Beaulieu C., Craig W., Doan Q., Freedman S.B., Goodyear B.G., Zemek R., Yeates K.O., Lebel C. Multisite harmonization of structural DTI networks in children: an A-CAP study. Front. Neurol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.850642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pederson E.J., Miller D.L., Simpson G.L., Ross N. Hierarchical generalized additive models in ecology: an introduction to mgcv. PeerJ. 2019;27(7):e6876. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phan K.L., Wager T., Taylor S.F., Liberzon I. Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage. 2002;16(2):331–348. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Posit Team. (2023). RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Posit Software, PBC. 〈http://www.posit.co/〉.
- R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2023 https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
- Rashidi F., Parsaei M., Kiani I., Sadri A., Aarabi M.H., Darijani S.R., Lee Y.S., Moghaddam H.S. White matter correlates of impulsive behavior in healthy individuals: a diffusion magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. Rep. 2024;3(4) doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raznahan A., Lee Y., Stidd R., Long R., Greenstein D., Clasen L., Addington A., Gogtay N., Rapoport J.L., Giedd J.N. Longitudinally mapping the influence of sex and androgen signaling on the dynamics of human cortical maturation in adolescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107(39):16988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006025107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Remer J., Croteau-Chonka E., Dean D.C., D’Arpino S., Dirks H., Whiley D., Deoni S.C.L. Quantifying cortical development in typically developing toddlers and young children, 1–6 years of age. Neuroimage. 2017;153:246–261. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds J.E., Grohs M.N., Dewey D., Lebel C. Global and regional white matter development in early childhood. NeuroImage. 2019;196:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds, J., Grohs, M., & Lebel, C. (2019). White matter tractography guides , 320846507 Bytes, Dataset, figshare. 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.7603271.V1. [DOI]
- Reynolds J.E., Long X., Paniukov D., Bagshawe M., Lebel C. Calgary Preschool magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dataset. Data Brief. 2020;29 doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rolls E.T., Joliot M., Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Implementation of a new parcellation of the orbitofrontal cortex in the automated anatomical labeling atlas. NeuroImage. 2015;122:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romer D., Duckworth A.L., Sznitman S., Park S. Can adolescents learn self-control? Delay of gratification in the development of control over risk taking. Prev. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Prev. Res. 2010;11(3):319–330. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0171-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell J.D., Marsee M.A., Weems C.F. Developmental variation in amygdala volumes: modeling differences across time, age, and puberty. Biol. Psychiatry. Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging. 2021;6(1):117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider F., Grodd W., Weiss U., Klose U., Mayer K.R., Nägele T., Gur R.C. Functional MRI reveals left amygdala activation during emotion. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging. 1997;76(2):75–82. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4927(97)00063-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schoenig D., Maynard L., Cazelles K., Braga P.H.P., Gongora E., Sherin L., Pedersen E., Taranu Z., Dussault C.F., Chrétien E., Fugère V. Chapter 8 GAM validation. Québec Centre for Biodiversity Science R Workshop Series. 2023 〈http://r.qcbs.ca/workshop08/book-en/gam-model-checking.html〉 [Google Scholar]
- Sergerie K., Chochol C., Armony J.L. The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2008;32(4):811–830. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shulman E.P., Harden K.P., Chein J.M., Steinberg L. Sex differences in the developmental trajectories of impulse control and sensation-seeking from early adolescence to early adulthood. J. Youth Adolesc. 2015;44(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0116-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shulman E.P., Smith A.R., Silva K., Icenogle G., Duell N., Chein J., Steinberg L. The dual systems model: review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2016;17:103–117. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simmonds D., Hallquist M.N., Asato M., Luna B. Developmental stages and sex differences of white matter and behavioral development through adolescence: a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. NeuroImage. 2014;92:356–368. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simpson G.L. Modelling palaeoecological time series using generalised additive models. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2018;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Simpson, G.L. (2023). gratia: Graceful ggplot-based graphics and other functions for GAMs fitted using mgcv. 〈https://gavinsimpson.github.io/gratia/〉.
- Simpson J.R., Ongür D., Akbudak E., Conturo T.E., Ollinger J.M., Snyder A.Z., Gusnard D.A., Raichle M.E. The emotional modulation of cognitive processing: an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000;12(2):157–170. doi: 10.1162/089892900564019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siraj R., Najam B., Ghazal S. Sensation seeking, peer influence, and risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Educ. Res. Int. 2021;2021(1) doi: 10.1155/2021/8403024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Somerville L.H., Jones R.M., Casey B.J. A time of change: behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. Brain Cogn. 2009;72(1):124. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sowell E.R., Thompson P.M., Holmes C.J., Jernigan T.L., Toga A.W. In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nat. Neurosci. 1999;2(10):859–861. doi: 10.1038/13154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinberg L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev. Rev. DR. 2008;28(1):78. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinberg L., Icenogle G., Shulman E.P., Breiner K., Chein J., Bacchini D., Chang L., Chaudhary N., Giunta L.D., Dodge K.A., Fanti K.A., Lansford J.E., Malone P.S., Oburu P., Pastorelli C., Skinner A.T., Sorbring E., Tapanya S., Tirado L.M.U.…Takash H.M.S. Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation. Dev. Sci. 2018;21(2) doi: 10.1111/desc.12532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephens R.L., Langworthy B.W., Short S.J., Girault J.B., Styner M.A., Gilmore J.H. White matter development from birth to 6 years of age: a longitudinal study. Cereb. Cortex. 2020;30(12):6152–6168. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiles J., Jernigan T.L. The basics of brain development. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2010;20(4):327–348. doi: 10.1007/s11065-010-9148-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutterer M.J., Koscik T.R., Tranel D. Sex-related functional asymmetry of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in regard to decision-making under risk and ambiguity. Neuropsychologia. 2015;75:265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swartz J.R., Carrasco M., Wiggins J.L., Thomason M.E., Monk C.S. Age-related changes in the structure and function of prefrontal cortex-amygdala circuitry in children and adolescents: a multi-modal imaging approach. NeuroImage. 2014;86:212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamnes C.K., Herting M.M., Goddings A.-L., Meuwese R., Blakemore S.-J., Dahl R.E., Güroğlu B., Raznahan A., Sowell E.R., Crone E.A., Mills K.L. Development of the cerebral cortex across adolescence: a multisample study of inter-related longitudinal changes in cortical volume, surface area, and thickness. J. Neurosci. 2017;37(12):3402–3412. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3302-16.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka C., Matsui M., Uematsu A., Noguchi K., Miyawaki T. Developmental trajectories of the Fronto-temporal lobes from infancy to early adulthood in healthy individuals. Dev. Neurosci. 2012;34(6):477–487. doi: 10.1159/000345152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson D.K., Matthews L.G., Alexander B., Lee K.J., Kelly C.E., Adamson C.L., Hunt R.W., Cheong J.L.Y., Spencer-Smith M., Neil J.J., Seal M.L., Inder T.E., Doyle L.W., Anderson P.J. Tracking regional brain growth up to age 13 in children born term and very preterm. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1) doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14334-9. Article 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tranel D., Damasio H., Denburg N.L., Bechara A. Does gender play a role in functional asymmetry of ventromedial prefrontal cortex? Brain A J. Neurol. 2005;128(Pt 12):2872–2881. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tustison N.J., Avants B.B., Cook P.A., Zheng Y., Egan A., Yushkevich P.A., Gee J.C. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2010;29(6):1310–1320. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyborowska A., Volman I., Smeekens S., Toni I., Roelofs K. Testosterone during puberty shifts emotional control from pulvinar to anterior prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2016;36(23):6156–6164. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3874-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uematsu A., Matsui M., Tanaka C., Takahashi T., Noguchi K., Suzuki M., Nishijo H. Developmental Trajectories of amygdala and hippocampus from infancy to early adulthood in healthy individuals. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vijayakumar N., Allen N.B., Youssef G., Dennison M., Yücel M., Simmons J.G., Whittle S. Brain development during adolescence: a mixed-longitudinal investigation of cortical thickness, surface area, and volume. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016;37(6):2027–2038. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vijayakumar N., Youssef G., Allen N.B., Anderson V., Efron D., Mundy L., Patton G., Simmons J.G., Silk T., Whittle S. The effects of puberty and its hormones on subcortical brain development. Compr. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2021;7 doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villa, L.M., Hampton, S., Aydin, E., Tait, R., Leming, M.J., Tsompanidis, A., Patterson, I., Allison, C., Austin, T., Suckling, J., Baron-Cohen, S., & Holt, R.J. (2021). Sex differences in brain development in fetuses and infants who are at low or high likelihood for autism, medRxiv. 10.1101/2021.03.08.21251862. [DOI]
- Volman I., Roelofs K., Koch S., Verhagen L., Toni I. Anterior prefrontal cortex inhibition impairs control over social emotional actions. Curr. Biol. CB. 2011;21(20):1766–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Adamson C., Yuan W., Altaye M., Rajagopal A., Byars A.W., Holland S.K. Sex differences in white matter development during adolescence: a DTI study. Brain Res. 2012;1478:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wierenga L., Langen M., Ambrosino S., van Dijk S., Oranje B., Durston S. Typical development of basal ganglia, hippocampus, amygdala and cerebellum from age 7 to 24. NeuroImage. 2014;96:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- William E., Moore I.I.I., Pfeifer J.H., Masten C.L., Mazziotta J.C., Iacoboni M., Dapretto M. Facing puberty: Associations between pubertal development and neural responses to affective facial displays. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2012;7(1):35. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood S.N. Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2004;99(467):673–686. doi: 10.1198/016214504000000980. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wood S.N. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2017. Generalized Additive Models: an Introduction with R, second ed. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yeates K.O., Beauchamp M., Craig W., Doan Q., Zemek R., Bjornson B.H., Gravel J., Mikrogianakis A., Goodyear B., Abdeen N., Beaulieu C., Dehaes M., Deschenes S., Harris A., Lebel C., Lamont R., Williamson T., Barlow K.M., Bernier F., Schneider K.J. Advancing Concussion Assessment in Pediatrics (A-CAP): a prospective, concurrent cohort, longitudinal study of mild traumatic brain injury in children: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu C., Chen Y., Müller H., Wang J., O’Muircheartaigh J., Bruchhage M., Deoni S. Trajectories of brain volumes in young children are associated with maternal education. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2023;44(8):3168–3179. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary material
Data Availability Statement
A portion of the neuroimaging data used in this study are freely available through the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/axz5r/, or the Canadian Open Neuroscience Platform: https://portal.conp.ca/dataset?id=projects/AdolescentBrainDevelopment. For more information, see Reynolds et al., (2020) and Geeraert et al., (2020). Other data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.



