Skip to main content
Animal Nutrition logoLink to Animal Nutrition
. 2025 Apr 4;21:439–446. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2025.03.004

The role of glycosylated mucins in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and gut health

Hao Cheng a,b,c, Hao Li a,b,c, Zhong Li a,c, Yun Wang b, Liangguo Liu b, Jing Wang a,c, Xiaokang Ma a,c,, Bie Tan a,c,
PMCID: PMC12148640  PMID: 40491555

Abstract

The intestinal mucus barrier is a crucial component of the host's innate defense system, playing a vital role in regulating intestinal microecology and maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Glycosylated mucins, the core components of this barrier, are essential for preserving its integrity by preventing bacterial degradation. Additionally, mucins significantly contribute to establishing a balanced symbiotic relationship between the host and microbes. These mucins have the potential to mitigate intestinal epithelial damage by capturing and transporting cell debris and pathogenic bacteria. Meanwhile, certain bacteria help maintain the equilibrium and stability of the gut microbiome by degrading glycosylated mucins to utilize the carbohydrate chains, thus affecting the cytokine expression to regulate the synthesis and secretion of specific glycans. Investigating the complex connections between the mucus barrier and mucin glycosylation holds great promise for advancing our understanding of gastrointestinal disease mechanisms, paving the way for innovative prevention and treatment strategies.

Keywords: Mucus barrier, Mucin, Glycosylation, Gut health, Gut microbiome

1. Introduction

The intestinal tract, as the primary site for nutrient digestion and absorption, is a pivotal organ in mammals, playing a crucial role in defending against bacterial invasion and endotoxin exposure within the intestinal lumen (Tang et al., 2016). At the heart of the innate host defense in the intestine lies a thick layer of mucus, serving as the frontline protector. This dense mucus layer, primarily structured around the hyperglycosylated mucin, effectively protects the epithelial surface from microorganisms and harmful substances (Paone and Cani, 2020). However, when the mucus layer is compromised, the intestinal epithelial tissue becomes vulnerable to pathogens, leading to various diseases such as enteritis and irritable bowel syndrome (Song et al., 2023). Some intestinal bacteria can degrade mucus glycans, using them as an energy source in competition with other bacteria. Meanwhile, certain gut bacteria can influence the glycosylation of intestinal mucins by altering factors such as energy levels, pH, and cytokine expression in intestinal mucosal cells, thereby regulating the synthesis and secretion of specific glycans (Chun et al., 2019). The dynamic equilibrium among the mucus layer, intestinal epithelial cells, microorganisms, and host immune defense is crucial for maintaining intestinal homeostasis.

Recent scientific and technological advancements have significantly expanded the understanding of the composition and function of the intestinal mucus barrier. This review systematically outlines the roles of the intestinal mucus barrier, with a particular focus on the structure, types, and functions of mucins. Additionally, the latest insights into the intricate interactions between the mucus barrier and the gut microbiota are integrated, emphasizing their influence on host health and disease development. By examining the relationship between glycosylated mucins and the integrity of the intestinal mucus barrier, this discussion aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on their physiological and pathological significance.

2. The basic properties of the intestinal mucus barrier

2.1. Composition of intestinal mucus

Intestinal mucus is primarily composed of water (90%), electrolytes, mucin glycoproteins, lipids, immunoglobulin A, bioactive peptides, and metabolites, and is a complex viscoelastic adherent secretion (Hansson, 2020). It is synthesized and secreted mainly by specialized goblet and mucous cells, with mucin as its central constituent (Elderman et al., 2017).

2.1.1. Mucin

Mucin is a macromolecular protein with extensive glycosylation, playing a pivotal role in ensuring the lubrication properties and barrier function of mucus (Pajic et al., 2022). Intestinal mucins can be broadly categorized into two types: 1) Secreted mucins, which primarily include mucin-2, mucin-5AC, mucin-5B, mucin-6, mucin-7, mucin-19, and mucin-9. These proteins form a vast polymer network throughout the gastrointestinal tract, constituting the core framework of the intestinal mucus layer. Secreted mucins can further be divided into gel-forming mucins (mucin-2, mucin-5AC, mucin-5B, mucin-6, mucin-19) and soluble mucins (mucin-7, mucin-8, mucin-9) (Johansson and Hansson, 2016). 2) Membrane-associated mucins, which cover the surface of intestinal epithelial cells and serve as anchors for the secreted mucin network (Wagner et al., 2018).

2.1.2. Trefoil factors

Trefoil factors (TFFs) are primarily secreted by gastrointestinal cells and contain a unique trefoil domain secondary structure, making them important components in maintaining the stability of the intestinal barrier within the mucus (Thim, 1989). The TFF family in mammals includes mammary cancer-associated peptide, spasmolytic peptide, and intestinal trefoil factor (ITF), with ITF mainly secreted by intestinal epithelial cells and binding to mucin-2 to form the first line of defense for the intestinal barrier (Song et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022). The ITF is a cysteine-rich secretory peptide composed of 42–43 amino acid residues, including six cysteine residues that form disulfide bonds in 1–5, 2–4, and 3–6 configurations (Thim and May, 2005). The ITF protects the gastrointestinal mucosa and promotes mucosal healing, exhibiting properties such as acid resistance, protease resistance, and thermal stability (Braga et al., 2020; Hoffmann, 2020).

2.1.3. The fc-binding protein of immunoglobulin G (FCGBP)

The FCGBP is also a component of colonic mucus, containing 13 von Willebrand factor domains, 12 cysteine-rich domains, and 12 pancreatic trypsin inhibitor-like domains (Liu et al., 2022). It is expressed and secreted by colonic epithelial cells, forming heterodimers with ITF through disulfide bonds. The ITF-FCGBP heterodimer interacts with mucin-2 via both covalent and non-covalent bonds, thereby maintaining the integrity of the intestinal mucus barrier (Herath et al., 2020).

Intestinal mucus contains a variety of antimicrobial peptides with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, which are essential components of the intestinal innate immune system. These peptides bind to negatively charged lipids in bacterial membranes via their positively charged surface amino acid residues, forming stable transmembrane and ion channels. This disrupts the bacterial cell membrane, inhibiting the growth and replication of pathogens (Song et al., 2023). Furthermore, immunoglobulins in intestinal mucus (especially immunoglobulin A) and bacterial metabolites are also key in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal mucus barrier. Immunoglobulin A, through its adhesive properties, helps defend against foreign pathogens, while microbial metabolites can regulate mucin glycosylation, influencing both the structure and function of intestinal mucus (Sanchez et al., 2014).

2.2. The structure of intestinal mucus

It has been found that the composition and structure of the mucus layer vary along the length of the digestive tract, corresponding to the shape and function of different intestinal regions (Xia et al., 2021). The small intestine features a single mucus layer that facilitates the smooth passage of nutrients, whereas the colon is enveloped by a thicker barrier, with the most substantial mucus layer in the gastrointestinal tract. The intricate structure of mucus, which includes the mucin domain, proline-threonine-serine (PTS) domains, and densely O-glycosylated regions, is essential for performing its diverse functions (Fig. 1). Mucus is a highly hydrated gel that forms mucous network structure through disulfide bridging between mucous protein units. These units have a backbone consisting of tandem repeats rich in proline, threonine, and/or serine, commonly known as the PTS domains (Herath et al., 2020). Additionally, mucins feature cysteine-rich regions at both the amino and carboxy termini, as well as interspersed locations throughout the PTS domains. These PTS domains are densely O-glycosylated, resulting in a bottlebrush-like appearance with branched oligosaccharide chains, known as glycans, radiating outward from the protein core (Song et al., 2023). One prominent mucin, mucin-2, forms an extensive net-like polymer structure, where the C-termini of individual mucin-2 molecules create dimeric complexes through disulfide bonds, while the N-termini form trimeric complexes.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The structure of intestinal O-glycosylated mucins. The intricate structure of mucus is vital for carrying out its diverse functions and encompasses several key elements, including the mucin domain, proline-threonine-serine (PTS) domains, and densely O-glycosylated regions. Protein core: Intestinal O-glycosylated mucins have a protein core composed of a central tandem repeat domain rich in serine, threonine, and proline residues. This domain provides the attachment sites for O-linked glycan chains. O-glycans are attached to the protein core via O-glycosidic linkages to the hydroxyl groups of serine and threonine residues in the tandem repeat domain. These O-glycans are highly heterogeneous and can vary in composition, length, and branching patterns. They typically contain various monosaccharides such as N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), galactose, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), fucose, and sialic acid. The O-glycosylated mucin molecule may exhibit secondary and tertiary structures, and mucins can adopt extended, coiled, or globular conformations, which may influence their functional properties.

2.3. The role of intestinal mucus

Intestinal mucus, an essential component of the intestinal epithelium, forms a complex physicochemical barrier that protects the host from the invasion of pathogens, toxins, and mechanical damage. This barrier not only offers physical protection but also plays a crucial role in immune responses and microbial regulation through its chemical constituents.

2.3.1. Physicochemical barrier

Intestinal mucus is a complex hydrogel that provides robust protection against the corrosive effects of gastric acid and digestive enzymes, safeguarding the gastrointestinal epithelium from damage. The physical barrier properties of intestinal mucus not only defend against external threats but also lubricate the surfaces of food as it moves through the digestive tract, helping to prevent damage associated with friction against the intestinal walls (Mcshane et al., 2021; Yuan and Cui, 2024). Additionally, the combination of mucins with electrolytes, lipids, and other smaller proteins imparts viscoelastic, lubricating, and hydrated properties, enabling mucus to adsorb various molecules and particles, such as drugs and other potentially harmful entities (pathogens, toxins, and contaminants) (Bansil and Turner, 2018; Murgia et al., 2018). Furthermore, mucus serves as a dynamic, semipermeable barrier with complex selective permeability, facilitating the exchange of nutrients, water, gases, and hormones while preventing the penetration of most bacteria and many pathogens (Boegh and Nielsen, 2015). Studies have shown that alterations in mucus permeability are associated with diseases such as cystic fibrosis and ulcerative colitis (Fang et al., 2021; Morrison et al., 2019). Dorofeyev et al. (2013) also reported increased permeability of colonic mucus in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, indicating compromised integrity of the mucus barrier.

Components with antimicrobial properties in mucus, such as antimicrobial peptides, immunoglobulins, and other bioactive molecules, help neutralize and eliminate pathogens, reducing the risk of infections. These components are essential for maintaining intestinal health and defending against pathogen invasion, acting as a chemical barrier (Bergstrom and Xia, 2022). Research has found that colonic mucus serves as a reservoir for antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), which can directly cover the mucus layer to kill or inhibit bacterial growth, preventing bacteria from attacking epithelial cells in the intestine (Antoni et al., 2013). Additionally, some antimicrobial peptides exhibit lectin-like behavior, binding to glycosylated proteins, lipopolysaccharides, and bacterial toxins to protect intestinal health (Kudryashova et al., 2014; Moser et al., 2014). Immunoglobulins also play a vital role in maintaining the function of the intestinal mucus barrier by binding to and neutralizing pathogens, preventing microbial penetration through intestinal epithelial cells. As early as four decades ago, Franek et al. (1984) proposed that secretory immunoglobulins are components of mucosal immunity, capable of recognizing harmful bacteria and immobilizing or neutralizing them. Kaetzel (2014) also reported that secretory immunoglobulins in the intestinal mucus layer can adhere to microorganisms, maintaining spatial separation between the gut microbiota and intestinal epithelial cells without affecting microbial metabolic activity.

2.3.2. Immune regulation

Intestinal mucus acts as a bridge between gut microbiota and the immune system. Research by Chen et al. (2021) found that the deletion of forkhead box protein O1 (Foxo1) in intestinal epithelial cells leads to defects in goblet cell autophagy and mucus secretion, resulting in increased susceptibility to intestinal inflammation. Shigemura et al. (2014) discovered that intestinal epithelial cells increase mucin synthesis through the synergistic effects of serum amyloid A3 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), effectively protecting epithelial cells from microbial invasion. Similar results were reported by Iwashita et al. (2003). Furthermore, the regulation of gut microbiota by mucus plays a crucial role in immune defense. Certain components in mucus, such as fucose and oligosaccharides in the sugar chains, serve as nutrients for specific bacteria, supporting the growth of beneficial microbes while inhibiting the proliferation of harmful ones (Alemao et al., 2021; Pruss et al., 2021).

In summary, mucus is a vital substance in the body, serving multiple vital functions, including lubricating and protecting epithelial surfaces, interacting with the immune system, and capturing and clearing foreign particles. Additionally, mucus supports nutrient absorption and facilitates smooth digestion, while providing a barrier against potential threats to the internal environment. As ongoing research continues to unravel the complexities of mucus and its functions, our understanding of its crucial role in maintaining overall animal health is deepening.

3. Mucin glycosylation

3.1. Mucin-2 is a critical element of the intestinal barrier

The integrity of the mucus layer predominantly relies on mucin-2, a highly glycosylated protein serving as attachment sites for O-linked glycans, and hydroxy-linked carbohydrate chains. Mucin-2 is fundamental to the lubrication, protection, and chemical barrier function of the intestinal mucus layer. It also plays a crucial role in transmitting immunomodulatory signals, thereby reducing the immunogenicity of intestinal antigens and decreasing the likelihood of invasion by bacteria and food antigens present in the intestinal cavity (Arike and Hansson, 2016). The mucus layer formed by mucin-2 dynamically interacts with intestinal epithelial cells, the microbiota, and the host immune defense, contributing to the maintenance of intestinal mucosal homeostasis (Bergstrom et al., 2020). Mucin-2 is a key protective component of the intestine against external stimuli, participating in various stress responses and resisting the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms. Research has shown that weaning-induced stress can disrupt the synthesis and secretion of mucin-2 in the intestine, leading to alterations in intestinal structure and function, which can result in intestinal barrier dysfunction and diarrhea (Sovran et al., 2016). Infections with Salmonella typhimurium and Lawsonia intracellularis reduce mucin-2 production, damaging the mucus layer and facilitating bacterial invasion (Bengtsson et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2009). Similarly, infection with Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in the colon causes mucoid hemorrhagic diarrhea and changes in the mucus layer, triggering increased mucin-2 secretion. This infection also induces a disorganized mucus structure, with massive mucus production and elevated mucin-2 levels in the colon (Quintana et al., 2017). This response may result from a compromised intestinal barrier, which triggers inflammation and promotes mucin secretion to resist the microbiota, helping to maintain intestinal microbiota balance.

Chronic inflammation or stress may regulate the expression of mucin-2 through related signals such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and toll-like receptors 2/4 (TLR2/4). These regulatory mechanisms may lead to abnormal mucin-2 production, disrupting the intestinal mucus barrier. As a result, intestinal microbes can translocate and directly interact with mucosal epithelial cells, exacerbating the inflammatory response. This process may play a significant role in intestinal stress-related diseases, including diarrhea (Paone and Cani, 2020; Vander et al., 2019).

3.2. Different glycan structures produced by O-glycosylated modification are decisive factors for the function of mucin

3.2.1. Core structure of sugar chain

Glycosylation is a post-translational processing modification of mucin, and it is also a decisive factor for the function of mucin (Fig. 2). This multi-step process occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus (Qu et al., 2021). The mucin monomer, synthesized by ribosomes in the cytoplasm of goblet cells, is first transported to the ER, where it forms dimers through intermolecular disulfide bonds. It is then transported to the Golgi apparatus for O-glycosylation, catalyzed by a series of glycosyltransferases (Bennett et al., 2012). Mucin undergoes O-glycosylation by two enzymes, core 1β1,3-galactosyltransferase (C1GALT1 or T-synthase) and core 3β1,3N-acetylglucosamine transferase (C3GnT), leading to the formation of core 1 and core 3 structures, respectively. These structures can further evolve into core 2 and core 4 structures, respectively, through the action of Core 2/4 β1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (C2/4GnT), encoded by the glucosaminyl n-acetyl transferas 3 (GCNT3) gene (Venkatakrishnan et al., 2017). These glycans with core 1–4 structures are commonly found in intestinal mucin, yet their distribution can be influenced by factors such as species, intestinal segment, diet, and microorganisms. For instance, the core 3 structure predominates in human intestinal mucin, while core 2 is more abundant in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of mice. In contrast, core 1 and core 3 structures are more prevalent in the colon (Bergstrom et al., 2017).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The process of generation of mucin-type O-glycan. The generation of mucin-type O-glycans occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus of cells. The process begins in the ER with the addition of a single N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) residue to the hydroxyl group of a serine or threonine residue on a protein substrate. After the initial GalNAc residue is attached, the glycoprotein is transported to the Golgi apparatus, where further elongation of the O-glycan chain occurs. The O-glycan chain can undergo various modifications, including sulfation, sialylation, and fucosylation in the Golgi apparatus. Once glycosylation is complete, the O-glycosylated proteins are transported to their target destinations within the cell or secreted into the extracellular environment. Mucin-type O-glycans are often found on the surface of epithelial cells, where they form the glycocalyx and contribute to cell–cell and cell-matrix interactions. C1GALT1C1 = core 1β1,3-galactosyltransferase specific molecular chaperone 1; C3GNT1 = core 3β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 1; C2GNT1 = core 2β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 1.

The major polysaccharides in the colonic mucus layer are mucin O-glycans derived from core 1 and core 3 structures (Sang et al., 2023). Recent studies have shown that the absence of the core 1 structure in mice results in damage to the colonic mucus barrier, leading to impaired intestinal mucosal barrier function (Suzuki et al., 2022). This compromised barrier function makes it easier for pathogens to breach the protective barrier and come into contact with the intestinal epithelium, leading to the onset of spontaneous colitis. Furthermore, mice lacking core 3-derived O-glycans exhibit elevated intestinal permeability compared to their littermates expressing high levels of core 3-derived O-glycans, thereby substantiating the pivotal role played by core 3-derived O-glycans in the preservation of mucosal integrity (Coletto et al., 2023). Core 2-derived O-glycans, synthesized by the enzyme core 2 β1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 2, extend the core 1-derived O-glycans (Pinho et al., 2023; Sang et al., 2023). A study by Ye et al. (2015) demonstrated that core 2 mucin-type O-glycans inhibit the invasion of enteropathogenic Escherichiacoli and enterohemorrhagic E. coli into intestinal epithelial cells by reducing bacterial adhesion to the epithelium. Similarly, mice deficient in core 2 or core 3 derived O-glycans exhibit baseline impairments in intestinal permeability and increased susceptibility to colitis (Bergstrom et al., 2017).

3.2.2. Modification of sugar chain

Different glycan structures can affect the shape and properties of mucin. Glycosylation is important for keeping mucin in an extended shape, which can influence its overall structure (Witten and Ribbeck, 2017). Furthermore, variations in glycan structure can also have significant implications for the colonization of intestinal microorganisms, as they influence the immunogenicity of mucin and regulate the composition of the gut microbiota (Bergstrom et al., 2020; Gamage et al., 2020; Hansson, 2020).

Fucose is a key sugar residue on mucin sugar chains, making up 4%–14% of total sugar groups and playing a key role in immune activity (Shuoker et al., 2023). It induces the phosphorylation of membrane receptors in enterohemorrhagic E.coli, which inhibits the activation of its virulence genes and reduces the strain's pathogenicity (Pacheco et al., 2012). Mutations in fucosylation genes, such as fucosyltransferase 2 (FUT2), increase susceptibility to inflammatory diseases like colitis, altering gut microbiota composition and carbohydrate secretion (Cheng et al., 2021). Moreover, fucosylated mucin can serve as substrates for metabolites, energy sources, and adhesion receptors for beneficial bacteria (Lei et al., 2022). Fucose has been shown to promote the abundance of beneficial gut bacteria, such as Bifidobacteria, supporting their functions (Kononova et al., 2021). Among the various glycan modifications, sialylation, regulated by sialyltransferase, occurs on mature mucin proteins (Yao et al., 2022). This process involves adding sialic acid to glycans, which is crucial for forming the mucin-2 network structure by providing a negative charge and hydrophilicity (Taniguchi et al., 2023). Sialylated glycan epitopes serve as attachment sites and nutrients for bacteria, protecting the mucus barrier from degradation and maintaining its integrity (Bell et al., 2023).

4. Interaction between intestinal microbiota and mucus barrier

The intestinal microbiota and gut mucin layer engage in interactions that are essential for the development of the mucus layer, microbial colonization, and stability of barrier function in the gut (Fig. 3) (Gamage et al., 2020). The mucus layer, which envelops the epithelial cells of the gut, upholds intestinal homeostasis by blocking certain pathogens, providing nutrients to microorganisms, and averting aberrant immune responses directed toward the microbiota (Luis and Hansson, 2023). The microbiota is an important player in health and physiology with many functions, such as digesting dietary nutrients, producing vitamins, stimulating the immune system, regulating the production and secreting of mucus, etc. (Paone and Cani, 2020).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The interaction of microbe and intestinal mucus barrier. LPS = lipopolysaccharide.

Host-derived mucus glycans on gut-secreted mucin proteins serve as a continuous endogenous source of microbiota-accessible carbohydrates for resident microbes. The glycosylation chain of mucin could adhere to intestinal symbiotic flora, help probiotics colonize in the intestine, and play a biological barrier role (Qu et al., 2021). Probiotics like Bifidobacterium can produce highly active fucosidase and sulfoglycosidase (BbhII), which degrades the sugar chain of mucins, releasing free fucose and N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfate (Katoh et al., 2023; Jess et al., 2011). Porcine mucin glycans have been shown to help restore the microbiota after antibiotic treatment, inhibit the abundance of Clostridium difficile and increase the relative abundance of resident Akkermansia muciniphila, thereby delaying the onset of diet-induced obesity, and maintaining the body health (Pruss et al., 2021). The glycan architecture of mucin significantly shapes the behavioral patterns of gut microbiota, influencing aspects such as energy metabolism, signaling pathways, and probiotic functionalities (Shin et al., 2019). Specific glycosylation processes enable mucin to exert immune responses against specific pathogens. For example, mucin sulfation and sialylation, orchestrated by IL-13/IL-4R, contribute to the expulsion of worms and nematodes from the intestine (Earley et al., 2019; Hasnain et al., 2017; Tsubokawa et al., 2017). Specific n-glycosylation supports the proliferation of succinate-consuming bacteria, consequently diminishing the availability of succinate—a crucial metabolite essential for the growth of Clostridium difficile (Nagao et al., 2020). Moreover, mucin likely mediates bacterial clearance through the regulation of microbial phenotypes, which attenuates pathogens and thereby facilitates host-mediated clearance (Takagi et al., 2022; Wheeler et al., 2019). To sum up, mucin is the material basis of intestinal mucous layer protection and microbial barrier function and plays a critical role in maintaining intestinal mucosal homeostasis, responding to various stressors, and resisting pathogenic microorganisms.

In a state of normal physiological conditions, the gut microbiota emerges as the foremost influential environmental factor shaping the glycosylation profile of the intestinal mucosa which plays a significant role in the initiation and progression of intestinal inflammation and associated diseases (Padra et al., 2019). The metabolites of symbiotic bacteria and cell surface-active substances, including short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan derivatives, and TLR ligands, may exert an influence on the glycosylation of intestinal mucins which is manifested by impacting cytokine expression of intestinal mucosal cells, the pH, the energy levels, etc. (Chun et al., 2019). Studies conducted previously have documented that the administration of oral probiotics has the capability to effectively restore the glycation profile of intestinal mucins and these probiotics play a protective role in preserving mucin-derived O-glycans from bacterial degradation and help in mitigating the risk of intestinal mucosa infection by opportunistic pathogens (Desantis et al., 2019; Schroeder et al., 2018). The colonization of Bifidobacterium dentium has also been shown to be effective in inducing intestinal endothelial cell fucosylation and mucin expression (Qu et al., 2021). Besides, Bacteroides polymorpha could stimulate the fucosylation modification of human intestinal mucin, reduce the sialic acid level of intestinal mucin in young animals, and promote the development and maturation of intestinal tissue, thereby protecting the intestinal mucosal epithelium from intestinal bacterial infection (Stahl et al., 2011). However, there are few studies on the interaction between intestinal probiotics and mucin glycosylation modification, and further research is needed to elucidate its mechanisms.

5. Intestinal mucus barrier and gut diseases

Alterations in the permeability, glycosylation profiles, and charge distributions of mucus barriers have been associated with changes in physiology. Abnormal modifications in these aspects may contribute to the onset of gut diseases, including ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, metabolic syndrome, Crohn's disease, and others. These conditions are often accompanied by disruptions in the composition and balance of the gut microbiota (Table 1). In addition, intestinal injury is also accompanied by abnormal changes in the intestinal mucus barrier. Inflammatory bowel disease, a chronic non-specific intestinal inflammatory disease comprising ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, has been extensively studied in relation to the mucus barrier. Ulcerative colitis, marked by inflammation restricted to the mucosa and submucosa of the colon, is influenced by a combination of factors including commensal microbiota, genetics, environment, and immune response (Chen et al., 2014). Research has indicated a substantial reduction in mucin sulfation in patients with ulcerative colitis, underscoring the pivotal role of colonic mucins in maintaining the normal physiological function of the colon (Kawashima, 2012). Furthermore, in the context of ulcerative colitis, the mucus layer undergoes thinning and partial denudation, potentially creating a condition wherein luminal microbes may invade the mucosa, triggering the onset of the disease (Dorofeyev et al., 2013). Crohn's disease, another subtype of inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic and nonspecific bowel inflammation that can affect any part of the intestinal tract, has also been associated with the mucus barrier. Allelic polymorphisms of mucin-1 and mucin-2 have been linked to Crohn's disease (Doron et al., 2013). Furthermore, Crohn's disease patients exhibit an altered microbiome profile characterized by an increased abundance of Enterobacteriaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Veillonellaceae, and Fusobacteriaceae, coupled with a decreased abundance of Erysipelotrichales, Bacteroidales, and Clostridiales (Basoglu and Karakoyun, 2023). In summary, the abnormality of the intestinal mucus barrier may be one of the pathogenesis of various intestinal diseases, involving the changes of flora, gene polymorphism, and other factors.

Table 1.

Intestinal mucus barrier and gut disease.

Diseases Changes in the mucus barrier Symptoms Cause of gut disease References
Crohn's disease Increased mucus thickness, and decreased mucin-2 protein Pain diarrhea Not well studied Doron et al. (2013)
Ulcerative colitis Decreased mucus thickness, goblet cell, and glycosylation Bloody diarrhea Not well studied Fernandez et al. (2021)
Cystic fibrosis Abnormal decreased mucus Pain, obstruction, and pancreatic insufficiency Inheritance Morrison et al. (2019)
Pseudomembranous colitis Thinning of the mucus layer Flatulence and loss of appetite Clostridium difficile infections Rheinallt and Andrew (2021)
Colorectal cancer Decreased mucus thickness, aberrant mucin expression, and simplified glycosylation Bloody diarrhea, pain, and flatulence Variations in the intestinal microbiome and some bacterial metabolites Song and Chan (2019),
Irritable bowel syndrome Non-specific inflammatory manifestations Indigestion, flatulence, and intermittent pain Brain–gut communication dysfunction, integrity of mucosa, and inflammation Zhao et al. (2018)
Invasive candidiasis Perturbations of mucosal microbiota Intestinal mucosal inflammation Pappas et al. (2018)

Research has also proposed that dietary factors can impact the integrity of the intestinal barrier (Desai et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2023). Dietary fiber, commonly found in the Western diet, has been shown to improve the integrity of the intestinal barrier by increasing mucus secretion, antibacterial proteins, and the production of T-regulatory cells (Sauvaitre et al., 2021). Dietary iron supplementation, through oral administration or injection, could activate mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1-ribosomal protein S6 kinase β-1 (mTORC1-S6K1) signaling, thereby promoting intestinal mucosal growth and mucus secretion (Dong et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023). Moreover, dietary probiotics such as lactobacillus and bifidobacterium increase host resistance to gastrointestinal diseases, intestinal infections, antibiotic-induced diarrhea, depression, and anxiety (Schroeder et al., 2018). In summary, the integrity of the gut barrier can be improved by adjusting diet, and dietary fiber and probiotics play an important role in this process; however, the exact mechanisms of these dietary effects require further study.

6. Existing problems and future research directions

Despite considerable advancements in comprehending the mucus barrier in recent years, various questions and uncertainties persist. The mechanisms associated with glycosyltransferase levels and activities, as well as the glycan repertoire on mucosal surfaces during inflammation and infection, remain poorly understood. Due to the complex physical and chemical properties of individual O-glycan structures, it is challenging to isolate and purify them from animal sources. Their specific mechanisms of action remain to be further studied. Furthermore, the regulation of the mucus barrier through interactions with the microbiota is an area that requires further exploration. To address these practical questions and advance our understanding of the mucus barrier, additional research is essential.

Credit Author Statement

Hao Cheng: Writing – original draft. Hao Li: Data curation. Zhong Li: Data curation. Yun Wang: Investigation. Liangguo Liu: Resources. Jing Wang: Supervision. Xiaokang Ma: Funding acquisition. Bie Tan: Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, and there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the content of this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32202692), the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2022JJ40176), National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1300403).

Contributor Information

Xiaokang Ma, Email: maxiaokang@hunau.edu.cn.

Bie Tan, Email: bietan@hunau.edu.cn.

References

  1. Alemao C.A., Budden K.F., Gomez H.M., Rehman S.F., Marshall J.E., Shukla S.D., Donovan C., Forster S.C., Yang I.A., Keely S., Mann E.R., Omar E.M.E., Belz G.T., Hansbro P.M. Impact of diet and the bacterial microbiome on the mucous barrier and immune disorders. Allergy. 2021;76(3):714–734. doi: 10.1111/all.14548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arike L., Hansson G.C. The densely O-glycosylated muc2 mucin protects the intestine and provides food for the commensal bacteria. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:3221–3229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antoni L., Nuding S., Weller D., Gersemann M., Ott G., Wehkamp J., Stange E.F. Human colonic mucus is a reservoir for antimicrobial peptides. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(12):652–664. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Basoglu I.A., Karakoyun B. Crohn's disease: etiology, pathogenesis and treatment strategies. Marmara Med J. 2023;36:249–254. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bansil R., Turner B.S. The biology of mucus: composition, synthesis and organization. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;124:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell A., Severi E., Owen C.D., Latousakis D., Juge N. Biochemical and structural basis of sialic acid utilization by gut microbes. J Biol Chem. 2023;299 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bengtsson R.J., MacIntyre N., Guthrie J., Wilson A.D., Finlayson H., Matika O., Wong R.P., Smith S.H., Archibald A.L., Ali T.A. Lawsonia intracellularis infection of intestinal crypt cells is associated with specific depletion of secreted Muc2 in goblet cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2015;168:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennett E.P., Mandel U., Clausen H., Gerken T.A., Fritz T.A., Tabak L.A. Control of mucin-type O-glycosylation: a classification of the polypeptide GalNAc-transferase gene family. Glycobiology. 2012;22:736–756. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwr182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bergstrom K., Fu J., Johansson M.E., Liu X., Gao N., Wu Q., Song J., Mcdaniel J.M., Mcgee S., Chen M., Braun J., Hansson G.C., Xia L. Core 1- and 3-derived O-glycans collectively maintain the colonic mucus barrier and protect against spontaneous colitis in mice. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10:91–103. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bergstrom K., Shan X., Casero D., Batushansky A., Lagishetty V., Jacobs J.P., Hoover C., Kondo Y.J., Shao B.I., Gao L., Zandberg W., Noyovitz B., Mcdaniel J.M., Gibson D.L., Pakpour S., Kazemian N., Mcgee S., Houchen C.W., Rao C.V., Griffin T.M., Sonnenburg J.L., Mcever R.P., Braun J., Xia L.J. Proximal colon-derived O-glycosylated mucus encapsulates and modulates the microbiota. Science. 2020;370:467–472. doi: 10.1126/science.aay7367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bergstrom K., Xia L. The barrier and beyond: roles of intestinal mucus and mucin-type O-glycosylation in resistance and tolerance defense strategies guiding host-microbe symbiosis. Gut Microbes. 2022;14 doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2052699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boegh M., Nielsen H.M. Mucus as a barrier to drug delivery–understanding and mimicking the barrier properties. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;116(3):179–186. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Braga E.N., Brierley S.M., Schroeder C.I., Muttenthaler M. Structure, function, and therapeutic potential of the trefoil factor family in the gastrointestinal tract. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2020;3(4):583–597. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Z., Luo J., Li J., Kim G., Xiao S., Snapper S.B., Bao B., An D.D., Bluberg R.S., Lin C.H., Wang S., Zhong J.X., Liu K., Li Q.Y., Wu C., Kuchroo V.K. Foxo1 controls gut homeostasis and commensalism by regulating mucus secretion. J Exp Med. 2021;218(9) doi: 10.1084/jem.20210324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen S.J., Liu X.W., Liu J.P., Yang X.Y., Lu F.G. Ulcerative colitis as a polymicrobial infection characterized by sustained broken mucus barrier. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9468–9475. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng S., Hu J., Wu X.R., Pan J.A., Jiao N., Li Y.C., Huang Y.B., Lin X.T., Zou Y.F., Chen Y., Zhu L.X., Zhi M., Lan P. Altered gut microbiome in FUT2 loss-of-function mutants in support of personalized medicine for inflammatory bowel diseases. J Genet Genomics. 2021;48:771–780. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chun E., Lavoie S., Fonseca P.D., Bae S., Michaud M., Hoveyda H.R., Fraser G.L., Comeau C.A.G., Glickman J.N., Fuller M.H., Layden B.T., Garrett W.S. Metabolite-sensing receptor ffar2 regulates colonic group 3 innate lymphoid cells and gut immunity. Immunity. 2019;51:871–884. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Coletto E., Savva G.M., Latousakis D., Pontifex M., Crost E.H., Vaux L., Telatin A., Bergstrom K., Vauzour D., Juge N. Role of mucin glycosylation in the gut microbiota-brain axis of core 3 O-glycan deficient mice. Sci Rep. 2023;13 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40497-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Desai M.S., Seekatz A.M., Koropatkin N.M., Kamada N., Hickey C.A., Wolter M., Puldo N.A. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell. 2016;167:1339–1353. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dong Z.L., Liu S., Deng Q.Q., Li G., Tang X., Wu X., Wan D., Yin Y. Role of iron in host-microbiota interaction and its effects on intestinal mucosal growth and immune plasticity in a piglet model. Sci China Life Sci. 2023;66:2086–2098. doi: 10.1007/s11427-022-2409-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Desantis S., Mastrodonato M., Accogli G., Rossi G., Crovace A.M. Effects of a probiotic on the morphology and mucin composition of pig intestine. Histol Histopathol. 2019;34:1037–1050. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dorofeyev A.E., Vasilenko I.V., Rassokhina O.A., Kondratiuk R.B. Mucosal barrier in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;1 doi: 10.1155/2013/431231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Doron B., Perets T.T., Vilkin A., Niv Y. Mucin function in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Rev. 2013;47:106–111. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182688e73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Earley H., Lennon G., Balfe A., Coffey J.C., Winter D.C., Connell P.R. The abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila and its relationship with sulphated colonic mucins in health and ulcerative colitis. Sci Rep. 2019;9 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51878-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Elderman M., Sovran B., Hugenholtz F., Graversen K., Huijskes M., Houtsma E., Belzer C., Boekschoten M., Vos P.D., Dekker J., Wells J., Faas M. The effect of age on the intestinal mucus thickness, microbiota composition and immunity in relation to sex in mice. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fang J., Wang H., Zhou Y.P., Zhang H., Zhou H.Y., Zhang X.H. Slimy partners: the mucus barrier and gut microbiome in ulcerative colitis. Exp Mol Med. 2021;53(5):772–787. doi: 10.1038/s12276-021-00617-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernandez T.L., Ortega M.L., Chaparro M., Gisbert J.P. Gut microbiota and dietary factors as modulators of the mucus layer in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19) doi: 10.3390/ijms221910224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Franek J., Libich J., Kubin V. Mechanisms of antibacterial immunity of mucous membranes. Folia Microbiol. 1984;29:375–384. doi: 10.1007/BF02887765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gamage H., Chong R.W.W., Bucio N.D., Kautto L., Hardikar A.A., Ball M.S., Molloy M.P., Packer N.H., Paulsen I.T. Changes in dietary fiber intake in mice reveal associations between colonic mucin O-glycosylation and specific gut bacteria. Gut Microbes. 2020;12 doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1802209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hansson G.C. Mucins and the microbiome. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89:769–793. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-011520-105053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hasnain S.Z., Dawson P.A., Lourie R., Hutson P., Tong P., Grencis R.K., McGuckin M.A., Thornton D.J. Immune-driven alterations in mucin sulphation is an important mediator of Trichuris muris helminth expulsion. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Herath M., Hosie S., Bornstein J.C., Franks A.E., Hill Y.E.L. The role of the gastrointestinal mucus system in intestinal homeostasis: implications for neurological disorders. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:248. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoffmann W. Refoil factor family (TFF) peptides and their diverse molecular functions in mucus barrier protection and more: changing the paradigm. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12):4535. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Iwashita J., Sato Y., Sugaya H., Abe T. mRNA of MUC2 is stimulated by IL-4, IL-13 or TNF-α through a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in human colon cancer cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2003;81(4):275–282. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2003.t01-1-01163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jess R.D., Monedero V., Yebra M.J. Utilization of natural fucosylated oligosaccharides by three novel fucosidases from a probiotic Lactobacillus casei strain. Appl Environ Mictobiol. 2011:703–705. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01906-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Johansson M.E., Hansson G.C. Immunological aspects of intestinal mucus and mucins. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:639–649. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaetzel C.S. Cooperativity among secretory IgA, the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor, and the gut microbiota promotes host–microbial mutualism. Immunol Lett. 2014;162(2):10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2014.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Katoh T., Yamada C., Wallace M.D., Yoshida A., Gotoh A., Arai M., Maeshibu T., Kasima T., Hagenbeek A., Ojima M.N., Takada H., Sakanaka M., Shimizu H., Nishiyama K., Ashida H., Hirose J., Suarea D.M., Nishiyama M. Ki. A bacterial sufoglycosidase highlights mucin O-glycan breakdown in the gut ecosystem. Nat Chem Biol. 2023;19(6):778–789. doi: 10.1038/s41589-023-01272-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kawashima H. Roles of the gel-forming Muc2 mucin and its o-glycosylation in the protection against colitis and colorectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2012;35:1637–1641. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b12-00412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim C.H., Kim D., Ha Y., Cho K.D., Lee B.H., Seo I.W., Kim S.H., Chae C. Expression of mucins and trefoil factor family protein-1 in the colon of pigs naturally infected with Salmonella typhimurium. J Comp Pathol. 2009;140:38–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kononova S., Litvinova E., Vakhitov T., Skalinskaya M., Sitkin S. Acceptive immunity: the role of fucosylated glycans in human host-microbiome interactions. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8):3854. doi: 10.3390/ijms22083854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kudryashova E., Quintyn R., Seveau S., Lu W., Wyscochi V.H., Kudryashov D.S. Human defensins facilitate local unfolding of thermodynamically unstable regions of bacterial protein toxins. Immunity. 2014;41(5):709–721. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lei C., Sun R., Xu G., Tan Y., Feng W., McClain C.J., Deng Z. Enteric VIP-producing neurons maintain gut microbiota homeostasis through regulating epithelium fucosylation. Cell Host Microbe. 2022;30(10):1417–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu Q., Niu X., Li Y., Zhang J.R., Zhu S.J., Yang Q.Y., Zhang W., Gong L. Role of the mucin-like glycoprotein FCGBP in mucosal immunity and cancer. Front Immunol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.863317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu S., Dong Z.L., Tang W.J., Zhou J., Guo L., Gong C., Liu G., Wan D., Yin Y. Dietary iron regulates intestinal goblet cell function and alleviates Salmonellla typhimurium invasion in mice. Sci China Life Sci. 2023;66:2006–2019. doi: 10.1007/s11427-022-2298-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Luis A.S., Hansson G.C. Intestinal mucus and their glycans: a habitat for thriving microbiota. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:1087–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mcshane A., Bath J., Jaramillo A.M., Ridley C., Walsh A.A., Evans C.M., Thornton D.J., Ribbeck K. Mucus. Curr Biol. 2021;31:938–945. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Morrison C.B., Markowetz M.R., Ehre C. Mucus, mucins, and cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019;54:84–96. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Moser S., Chileveru H.R., Tomaras J., Nolan E.M. A bacterial mutant library as a tool to study the attack of a defensin peptide. Chembiochem. 2014;15(18):2684. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Murgia X., Loretz B., Hartwig O., Hittinger M., Lehr C.M. The role of mucus on drug transport and its potential to affect therapeutic outcomes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;124(15):82–97. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nagao kH., Leslie J.L., Kitamoto S., Jin C.S., Thomsson K.A., Gilliland M.G., Kuffa P., Goto Y., Jenq R.R., Ishii C., Hirayama A., Seekatz A.M., Martens E.C., Eaton K.A., Kao J.Y., Fukuda S.J., Higgins P.D.R., Kalsson N.G., Young V.B., Kamada N. Interleukin-22-mediated host glycosylation prevents Clostridioides difficile infection by modulating the metabolic activity of the gut microbiota. Nat Med. 2020;26:608–617. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0764-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pacheco A.R., Curtis M.M., Ritchie J.M., Munera D., Waldor M.K., Moreira C.G., Sperando V. Fucose sensing regulates bacterial intestinal colonization. Nature. 2012;492:113–117. doi: 10.1038/nature11623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Padra M., Adamczyk B., Flahou B., Erhaedsson M., Chahal G., Smet A., Jin C., Thorell A., Ducatelle R., Haesebrouck F., Karlsson N.G., Linden S.K. Helicobacter suis infection alters glycosylation and decreases the pathogen growth inhibiting effect and binding avidity of gastric mucins. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12:784–794. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pajic P., Shen S.C., Qu J., May A.J., Knox S., Ruhl S., Gokcumen O. A mechanism of gene evolution generating mucin function. Sci Adv. 2022;8:1–14. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm8757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Paone P., Cani P.D. Mucus barrier, mucins and gut microbiota: the expected slimy partners? Gut. 2020;69:2232–2243. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pappas G.P., Lionakis M.S., Arendrup M.C., Ostrosky Z.L., Kullberg B.J. Invasive candidiasis. Nature Reviews. 2018;26 doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pinho S.S., Alves I., Gaifem J., Rabinovich G.A. Immune regulatory networks coordinated by glycans and glycan-binding proteins in autoimmunity and infection. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20(10):1101–1113. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-01074-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pruss K.M., Marcobal A., Southwick A.M., Dahan D., Smits S.A., Ferreyra J.A., Higginbottom S.K., Sonnenburg E.D., Kashyap P.C., Choudhury B., Bode L., Sonnenburg J.L. Mucin-derived O-glycans supplemented to diet mitigate diverse microbiota perturbations. ISME J. 2021;15(2):577–591. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00798-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Qu D., Wang G., Yu L., Tian F., Chen W., Zhai Q. The effects of diet and gut microbiota on the regulation of intestinal mucin glycosylation. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;258 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Quintana H.M.P., Navabi N., Mahu M., Venkatakrishnan V., Fernandez H.R., Haesebrouck F., Pasmans F., Linden S.K. Neutrophil elastase and interleukin 17 expressed in the pig colon during brachyspira hyodysenteriae infection synergistically with the pathogen induce increased mucus transport speed and production via mitogen-activated protein kinase 3. Infect Immun. 2017;85:8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00262-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rheinallt M.J., Andrew S.N. Gut microbiota in intestinal and liver disease. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2021;16:251–275. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-030320-095722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sanchez D.M.F., Romero C.I., Mascaraque C., Martinez A.O. Intestinal inflammation and mucosal barrier function. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(12):2394–2404. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sang X., Wang Q., Ning Y., Wang H., Zhang R., Fang B., Lv C., Zhang Y., Wang X., Ren F. Age-related mucus barrier dysfunction in mice is related to the changes in Muc2 mucin in the colon. Nutrients. 2023;15 doi: 10.3390/nu15081830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sauvaitre T., Etienne M.L., Sivignon A., Mosoni P., Courtin C., Vande W.T., Blanquert D.S. Tripartite relationship between gut microbiota, intestinal mucus and dietary fibers: towards preventive strategies against enteric infections. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2021;45(2):52. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Schroeder B.O., Birchenough G.M.H., Stahlman M., Arike L., Johansson M.E.V., Hansson G.C., Backhed F. Bifidobacteria or fiber protects against diet-induced microbiota-mediated colonic mucus deterioration. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shin J., Noh J.R., Chang D.H., Kim Y.H., Kim M.H., Lee E.S., Cho S.Y., Ku B.J., Rhee M.S., Kim B.C., Lee C.H., Cho B.K. Elucidation of akkermansia muciniphila probiotic traits driven by mucin depletion. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1137. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Shigemura H., Ishiguro N., Inoshima Y. Up-regulation of MUC2 mucin expression by serum amyloid A3 protein in mouse colonic epithelial cells. J Vet Med Sci. 2014;76(7):985–991. doi: 10.1292/jvms.14-0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Shuoker B., Pichler M.J., Jin C., Sakanaka H., Wu H., Gascuena A.M., Liu J.N., Nielsen T.S., Holgersson J., Karlsson E.N., Juge N., Meier S., Morth J.P., Karlsson N.G., Hachem M.A. Sialidases and fucosidases of Akkermansia muciniphila are crucial for growth on mucin and nutrient sharing with mucus-associated gut bacteria. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1833. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37533-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Song C., Chai Z., Chen S., Zhang H., Zhang X., Zhou Y. Intestinal mucus components and secretion mechanisms: what we do and do not know. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55:681–691. doi: 10.1038/s12276-023-00960-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Song M., Chan A.T. Environmental factors, gut microbiota, and colorectal cancer prevention. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(2):275–289. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sovran B., Lu P., Linda M.P.L., Hugenholtz F., Belzer C., Stolte E.H., Boekschoten M.V., Baarlen P.V., Smidt H., Kleerebezem M., Vos P.D., Renes I.B., Wells J.M., Dekker J. Identification of commensal species positively correlated with early stress responses to a compromised mucus barrier. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016:1–15. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Stahl M., Friis L.M., Nothaft H., Liu X., Li J., Szymanski C.M., Stintzi A. L-fucose utilization provides Campylobacter jejuni with a competitive advantage. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:7194–7199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014125108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Suzuki R., Nakamura Y., Koiwai R., Fuseya S., Murakami Y., Hagiwara K., Sato T., Takahashi S., Kudo T. Global loss of core 1-derived o-glycans in mice leads to high mortality due to acute kidney failure and gastric ulcers. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23 doi: 10.3390/ijms23031273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Takagi J., Aoki K., Turner B.S., Lamont S., Lehoux S., Kavanaugh N., Gulati M., Tiemeyer M., Hevey R., Ribbeck K. Mucin O-glycans are natural inhibitors of Candida albicans pathogenicity. Nat Chem Biol. 2022;18:762–773. doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01035-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tang X., Liu H., Yang S., Li Z., Zhong J., Fang R. Epidermal growth factor and intestinal barrier function. Mediat Inflamm. 2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/1927348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Taniguchi M., Okumura R., Matsuzaki T., Nakatani A., Sakaki K., Okamoto S., Ishibashi A., Tani H., Horikiri M., Kobayashi N., Yoshikawa H.Y., Motooka D., Takeda K. Sialylation shapes mucus architecture inhibiting bacterial invasion in the colon. Mucosal Immunol. 2023;16:624–641. doi: 10.1016/j.mucimm.2023.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Thim L. A new family of growth factor-like peptides ‘Trefoil’disulphide loop structures as a common feature in breast cancer associated peptide (pS2), pancreatic spasmolytic polypeptide (PSP), and frog skin peptides (spasmolysins) FEBS Lett. 1989;250(1):85–90. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)80690-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Thim L., May F.E.B. Trefoil factors: structure of mammalian trefoil factors and functional insights. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:2956–2973. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5484-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Tsubokawa D., Ishiwata K., Goso Y., Nakamura T., Hatta T., Ishihara K., Kanuka H., Tsuji N. Interleukin-13/interleukin-4 receptor pathway is crucial for production of Sd(a)-sialomucin in mouse small intestinal mucosa by Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infection. Parasitol Int. 2017;66:731–734. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Vander P.S., Jabbar K.S., Birchenough G., Arike L., Akhtar N., Sjovall H., Johansson M.E.V., Hansson G.C. Structural weakening of the colonic mucus barrier is an early event in ulcerative colitis pathogenesis. Gut. 2019;68:2142–2151. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Venkatakrishnan V., Quintana-Hayashi M.P., Mahu M., Haesebrouck F., Pasmans F., Linden S.K. Brachyspira hyodysenteriae infection regulates mucin glycosylation synthesis inducing an increased expression of core-2 o-glycans in porcine colon. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:1728–1742. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wagner C.E., Wheeler K.M., Ribbeck K. Mucins and their role in shaping the functions of mucus barriers. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2018;34:189–215. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Wheeler K.M., Carcamo G.O., Turner B.S., Nolan S.D., Co J.Y., Lehoux S., Cummings R.D., Wozniak D.J., Ribbeck K. Mucin glycans attenuate the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infection. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4(12):2146–2154. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0581-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Witten J., Ribbeck K. The particle in the spider's web: transport through biological hydrogels. Nanoscale. 2017;9:8080–8095. doi: 10.1039/c6nr09736g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Xia B., Wu W., Zhang L., Wen X., Xie J., Zhang H. Gut microbiota mediates the effects of inulin on enhancing sulfomucin production and mucosal barrier function in a pig model. Food Funct. 2021;12:10967–10982. doi: 10.1039/d1fo02582a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Yang Y.Q., Lin Z.Y., Lin Q.Y., Bei W., Guo J. Pathological and therapeutic roles of bioactive peptide trefoil factor 3 in diverse diseases: recent progress and perspective. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(1):62. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04504-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Yao Y., Kim G., Shafer S., Chen Z.J., Kubo S., Ji Y.L., Luo J.L., Yang W.M., Perner S.P., Kanellopoulou C., Park A.Y., Jiang P., Li J., Baris S., Aydiner E.K., Ertem D., Mulder D.J., Warner N., Griffiths A.M., Kori M., Werner L., Ouahed J., Field M., Liu C.Y., Schwarz B., Boiso C.M., Ganesan S., Song J., Urlaub H., Oelerich T., Malaker S.A., Zheng L.X., Zhang Y., Pan K.Y., Wu C., Lenardo M.J. Mucus sialylation determines intestinal host-commensal homeostasis. Cell. 2022;185:1172–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Yuan H., Cui W. The lubricated matter in body. Prog Mater Sci. 2024 [Google Scholar]
  89. Ye J., Pan Q., Shang Y., Wei X., Peng Z., Chen W., Chen L., Wang R. Core 2 mucin-type o-glycan inhibits EPEC or EHEC O157:H7 invasion into HT-29 epithelial cells. Gut Pathog. 2015;7:31. doi: 10.1186/s13099-015-0078-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhao K., Yu L.M., Wang X., He Y., Lu B. Clostridium butyricum regulates visceral hypersensitivity of irritable bowel syndrome by inhibiting colonic mucous low grade inflammation through its action on NLRP6. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2018;50(2):216–223. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmx138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animal Nutrition are provided here courtesy of KeAi Publishing

RESOURCES