Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2025 Jun 5;392(21):2174–2176. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2412487

Bedaquiline Activity against Leprosy

Abdoulaye Fomba 1, Fadima C Haidara 1, Mamoudou Kodio 1, Catherine Arama 1, Emmanuelle Cambau 2, Aurélie Chauffour 3, Nicolas Veziris 3, Bettina E Broeckling 4, Alaine K Warren 4, Bertrand Cauchoix 5, Alexandre Alcaïs 6, Laurent Marsollier 7, Henri Assé 5, Mary Jackson 4, Samba O Sow 1, Ousmane Faye 1, Vincent Jarlier 3, Stewart T Cole 8, Charlotte Avanzi 4, Alexandra Aubry 3, Roch C Johnson 5
PMCID: PMC12158421  NIHMSID: NIHMS2084431  PMID: 40466073

TO THE EDITOR:

Leprosy, results from infection with the unculturable pathogen Mycobacterium leprae, and ~200,000 new cases are reported annually1. Multidrug therapy (MDT) for multibacillary leprosy lasts 12 months and is compromised by antimicrobial resistance and side-effects1. A potent candidate to improve leprosy treatment is the anti-tuberculosis drug, bedaquiline (BDQ)2, which has shortened treatment duration for drug-resistant tuberculosis3. At doses as low as 1 mg/kg 4, BDQ is active against M. leprae in murine models thereby supporting its use in humans.

In the open label clinical trial reported here, BDQ4LEP (PACTR202408643515316), we assessed the bactericidal activity of BDQ in 30 patients with untreated multibacillary leprosy at a single site in Bamako, Mali. The protocol was approved by the relevant ethics committees according to local regulations and all participants provided written informed consent. Patients were treated daily with 200 mg for two weeks, then 3 times per week with 100 mg for six weeks. Patients subsequently received standard MDT for one year and were followed for relapse for another year. All BDQ-treatment was supervised and skin biopsies taken at days 0, 56 and after MDT, to measure microbiologic and molecular biomarker levels that reflect treatment efficacy. All three biopsies were obtained from 17 patients and for days 0 and 56 from 25 BDQ-treated patients.

The bacillary and morphological indices decreased over time (Fig. 1A, B and Table S2 and S7 in the Supplementary Appendix available at NEJM.org) in biopsies from the 17 patients who completed both BDQ and MDT treatment. We also monitored the decline in DNA and mRNA levels, surrogate molecular biomarkers for M. leprae viability, using the RLEP repetitive sequence, and esxA and hsp18 gene expression5. The RLEP signal decreased modestly between days 0 and 56 and DNA could still be detected after MDT, albeit at low levels (Fig. 1C, Tables S4 and S7). A decrease was detected in mRNA levels by the molecular viability assay (Fig. 1D, Tables S5 and S7) between days 0 and 56 and no mRNA was detectable after MDT.

Figure 1: Biomarker responses to Bedaquiline treatment.

Figure 1:

A. Bacteriological index of biopsies from the 17 patients who completed 2 months of bedaquiline treatment and the full course of multidrug therapy measured by microscopy at day 0, day 56 and at the end of multidrug therapy. B. Number of bacilli/mL calculated by RLEP qPCR in the same 17 patients from day 0, day 56 and end of multidrug therapy. C. Morphological index for the same 17 patients measured by microscopy at day 0, day 56 and end of multidrug therapy. D. Percentage decrease in the expression levels of esxA and hsp18 mRNA between day 0 and day 56 for patients (n=20) as measured by the molecular viability assay. Patient 20 was excluded due to no viability at day 0. Molecular viability was collected only for 21 patients at D0 and D56. E. Percentage of viable bacteria in mouse footpads measured by microscopy at day 0 and day 56 in 25 patients. The inset box highlights a zoomed-in view of the percentage of viable bacteria at D56. The viability threshold is noted as 0.04% (limit of detection of the method) and only one sample showed viability at D56. Descriptive statistic was calculated in GraphPad Prism v10.

Bacilli from biopsies were inoculated into mice and bacterial growth enumerated after 12 months. All 30 day 0 biopsies were culture positive, whereas 24 of 25 (96%) biopsies were culture negative after 56 days of BDQ-treatment (Fig. 3E, Table S6). Likewise, all 17 biopsies tested from patients who completed MDT were culture negative (Table S4). No relapse was observed during the follow-up period (at least 12 months).

The BDQ4LEP findings indicate that BDQ monotherapy clears M leprae by day 56. BDQ has potential as a leprosy treatment and merits further study.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Appendix

Acknowledgments

Supported principally by the Fondation Raoul Follereau and grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (award number R21AI171254 to Dr. Avanzi) and the Heiser Program of the New York Community Trust for Research in Leprosy (grant no. P21–000127 to Dr. Avanzi). The following reagent was obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Genomic DNA from Mycobacterium leprae, Strain Thai-53, NR-19352. Bedaquiline was kindly donated by Janssen Pharmaceuticals NVA.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

References

  • 1.WHO. Global leprosy update, 2017: reducing the disease burden due to leprosy. Weekly epidemiological record 2018;93:445–456. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andries K, Verhasselt P, Guillemont J, et al. A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2005;307(5707):223–7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1106753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Conradie F, Diacon AH, Ngubane N, et al. Treatment of Highly Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2020;382(10):893–902. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gelber R, Andries K, Paredes RM, Andaya CE, Burgos J. The diarylquinoline R207910 is bactericidal against Mycobacterium leprae in mice at low dose and administered intermittently. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53(9):3989–91. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00722-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davis GL, Ray NA, Lahiri R, et al. Molecular assays for determining Mycobacterium leprae viability in tissues of experimentally infected mice. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7(8):e2404. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Appendix

RESOURCES