Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1989 Feb;61(2):161–166. doi: 10.1136/hrt.61.2.161

Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: a non-invasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler.

D Mehta 1, S Gilmour 1, D E Ward 1, A J Camm 1
PMCID: PMC1216634  PMID: 2923753

Abstract

The optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise was investigated in nine patients with heart block and implanted dual chamber pacemakers. All patients studied had normal left ventricular function and a normal sinus node rate response to exercise. Cardiac output was measured by continuous wave Doppler and was calculated as the product of stroke distance measured by Doppler at the left ventricular outflow, aortic root area measured by M mode echocardiography, and heart rate. Pacemakers were programmed in the DDD mode. Cardiac output was measured with the patient at rest while supine and while erect and at the peak of submaximal exercise (the end of stage 1 of the Bruce protocol) with the pacemakers programmed to the following atrioventricular intervals: 75-80 ms, 100-110 ms, 140-150 ms, and 200 ms. During exercise the basic pacing rate was programmed to 70 beats/min. Cardiac output at rest while supine and erect was greatest with an atrioventricular delay of 140-150 ms and it was significantly higher than that with an atrioventricular delay of 75-80 ms. On average there was a 31% decrease in cardiac output when patients stood up. During treadmill exercise, however, cardiac output was greatest when the atrioventricular delay was 75-80 ms, and this was significantly higher than the cardiac output with atrioventricular delays of 150 and 200 ms. During exercise 1:1 atrioventricular relations were maintained in patients at all atrioventricular intervals. In patients with atrioventricular sequential pacemakers cardiac output at rest is greatest with an atrioventricular delay of 140-150 ms but during exercise the optimal atrioventricular delay is shorter. Rate modulation of the atrioventricular interval may improve the haemodynamic response and possibly exercise tolerance in patients with dual chamber pacemakers.

Full text

PDF
161

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BURCHELL H. B. A CLINICAL APPRAISAL OF ATRIAL TRANSPORT FUNCTION. Lancet. 1964 Apr 11;1(7337):775–779. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(64)92976-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruce R. A. Exercise testing of patients with coronary heart disease. Principles and normal standards for evaluation. Ann Clin Res. 1971 Dec;3(6):323–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carleton R. A., Passovoy M., Graettinger J. S. The importance of the contribution and timing of left atrial systole. Clin Sci. 1966 Feb;30(1):151–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chamberlain D. A., Leinbach R. C., Vassaux C. E., Kastor J. A., DeSanctis R. W., Sanders C. A. Sequential atrioventricular pacing in heart block complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1970 Mar 12;282(11):577–582. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197003122821101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chandraratna P. A., Nanna M., McKay C., Nimalasuriya A., Swinney R., Elkayam U., Rahimtoola S. H. Determination of cardiac output by transcutaneous continuous-wave ultrasonic Doppler computer. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):234–237. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90718-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Daley P. J., Sagar K. B., Wann L. S. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of flow velocity in the ascending aorta during supine and upright exercise. Br Heart J. 1985 Dec;54(6):562–567. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.6.562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Darsee J. R., Walter P. F., Nutter D. O. Transcutaneous Doppler method of measuring cardiac output--II. Noninvasive measurement by transcutaneous Doppler aortic blood velocity integration and M mode echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1980 Oct;46(4):613–618. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90511-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daubert C., Ritter P., Mabo P., Ollitrault J., Descaves C., Gouffault J. Physiological relationship between AV interval and heart rate in healthy subjects: applications to dual chamber pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986 Nov;9(6 Pt 2):1032–1039. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb06666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Faerestrand S., Ohm O. J. A time-related study of the hemodynamic benefit of atrioventricular synchronous pacing evaluated by Doppler echocardiography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1985 Nov;8(6):838–848. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1985.tb05903.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Freedman R. A., Yock P. G., Echt D. S., Popp R. L. Effect of variation in PQ interval on patterns of atrioventricular valve motion and flow in patients with normal ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Mar;7(3):595–602. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80470-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartzler G. O., Maloney J. D., Curtis J. J., Barnhorst D. A. Hemodynamic benefits of atrioventricular sequential pacing after cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Aug;40(2):232–236. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(77)90013-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haskell R. J., French W. J. Optimum AV interval in dual chamber pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986 Sep;9(5):670–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb05414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iwase M., Sotobata I., Yokota M., Takagi S., Jing H. X., Kawai N., Hayashi H., Murase M. Evaluation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography of the atrial contribution to left ventricular filling in patients with DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jul 1;58(1):104–109. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90251-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kosowsky B. D., Scherlag B. J., Damato A. N. Re-evaluation of the atrial contribution to ventricular function: study using His bundle pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1968 Apr;21(4):518–524. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(68)90284-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leinbach R. C., Chamberlain D. A., Kastor J. A., Harthorne J. W., Sanders C. A. A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ventricular and sequential A-V pacing in patients with heart block. Am Heart J. 1969 Oct;78(4):502–508. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(69)90484-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leman R. B., Kratz J. M. Radionuclide evaluation of dual chamber pacing: comparison between variable AV intervals and ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1985 May;8(3 Pt 1):408–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1985.tb05780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Little R. C. The mechanism of closure of the mitral valve: a continuing controversy. Circulation. 1979 Apr;59(4):615–618. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.4.615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mehta N., Bennett D., Mannering D., Dawkins K., Ward D. E. Usefulness of noninvasive Doppler measurement of ascending aortic blood velocity and acceleration in detecting impairment of the left ventricular functional response to exercise three weeks after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Nov 1;58(10):879–884. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(86)80003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nanda N. C., Bhandari A., Barold S. S., Falkoff M. Doppler echocardiographic studies in sequential atrioventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983 Jul;6(4):811–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb05345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nitsch J., Seiderer M., Büll U., Lüderitz B. Evaluation of left ventricular performance by radionuclide ventriculography in patients with atrioventricular versus ventricular demand pacemakers. Am Heart J. 1984 May;107(5 Pt 1):906–911. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90826-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SAMET P., BERNSTEIN W. H., NATHAN D. A., LOPEZ A. ATRIAL CONTRIBUTION TO CARDIAC OUTPUT IN COMPLETE HEART BLOCK. Am J Cardiol. 1965 Jul;16:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(65)90002-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. SKINNER N. S., Jr, MITCHELL J. H., WALLACE A. G., SARNOFF S. J. HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ALTERING THE TIMING OF ATRIAL SYSTOLE. Am J Physiol. 1963 Sep;205:499–503. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1963.205.3.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. SKINNER N. S., Jr, MITCHELL J. H., WALLACE A. G., SARNOFF S. J. HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ALTERING THE TIMING OF ATRIAL SYSTOLE. Am J Physiol. 1963 Sep;205:499–503. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1963.205.3.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stewart W. J., Dicola V. C., Harthorne J. W., Gillam L. D., Weyman A. E. Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac output in patients with physiologic pacemakers. Effects of left ventricular function and retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Aug 1;54(3):308–312. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90188-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Videen J. S., Huang S. K., Bazgan I. D., Mechling E., Patton D. D. Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jun 1;57(15):1305–1308. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90209-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. von Bibra H., Wirtzfeld A., Hall R., Ulm K., Blömer H. Mitral valve closure and left ventricular filling time in patients with VDD pacemakers. Assessment of the onset of left ventricular systole and the end of diastole. Br Heart J. 1986 Apr;55(4):355–363. doi: 10.1136/hrt.55.4.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES