Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1996 Jun 15;316(Pt 3):713–721. doi: 10.1042/bj3160713

Effects of the type of divalent cation, Ca2+ or Mg2+, bound at the high-affinity site and of the ionic composition of the solution on the structure of F-actin.

H Strzelecka-Golaszewska 1, A Wozniak 1, T Hult 1, U Lindberg 1
PMCID: PMC1217409  PMID: 8670143

Abstract

F-actins containing either Ca2+ or Mg2+ at the single high-affinity site for a divalent cation differ in their dynamic properties [Carlier (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1-4]. In an attempt to obtain information on the structural basis of this difference, we probed the conformation of specific sites in the subunits of Mg- and Ca-F-actin with limited proteolysis by subtilisin and trypsin. The influence of the kind of polymerizing salt was also investigated. At high proteinase concentrations required for digestion of actin in the polymer form, subtilisin gives a complex fragmentation pattern. In addition to the earlier known cleavage between Met47 and Gly48 in the DNAse-I-binding loop, cleavage of F-actin between Ser234 and Ser235 in subdomain 4 has recently been reported [Vahdat, Miller, Phillips, Muhlrad and Reisler (1995) FEBS Lett. 365, 149-151]. Here we show that actually a larger segment, comprising residues 227-235, is removed and the bond between Leu67 and Lys68 in subdomain 2 is split in both G- and F-actin, and that the differences in the fragmentation patterns of the G- and F-forms are accounted for by the protection of the bond 47-48 in F-actin. The subtilisin and trypsin cleavage sites in segment 61-69, subtilisin sites in segment 227-235 and trypsin sites between Lys373 and Cys374 were less accessible in Mg-F-actin than in Ca-F-actin. These are intramolecular effects, as similar changes were observed on Ca2+/Mg2+ replacement in G-actin. The cation-dependent effects, in particular those on segment 61-69, were however less pronounced in F-actin than in G-actin. The results suggest that substitution of Mg2+ for Ca2+, and KCl-induced polymerization of CaATP-G-actin, bring about a similar change in the conformation of subdomain 2 of the monomer. The presence of Mg2+ at the high-affinity site also resulted in an increased protection of the bond 47-48. This latter appears to be an intermolecular effect because it is specific for F-actin. The susceptibility to subtilisin and trypsin was also strongly influenced by the kind and concentration of polymerizing salt. The digestion patterns suggest that the exposure and/or flexibility of the regions containing the cleavage sites diminish with enhancement of the ionic strength of the solution. The results are discussed in terms of the current models of F-actin.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (559.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams S. B., Reisler E. Sequence 18-29 on actin: antibody and spectroscopic probing of conformational changes. Biochemistry. 1994 Dec 6;33(48):14426–14433. doi: 10.1021/bi00252a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carlier M. F. Actin: protein structure and filament dynamics. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 5;266(1):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drewes G., Faulstich H. A reversible conformational transition in muscle actin is caused by nucleotide exchange and uncovers cysteine in position 10. J Biol Chem. 1991 Mar 25;266(9):5508–5513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Elzinga M., Collins J. H., Kuehl W. M., Adelstein R. S. Complete amino-acid sequence of actin of rabbit skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Sep;70(9):2687–2691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.9.2687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Erickson H. P. Co-operativity in protein-protein association. The structure and stability of the actin filament. J Mol Biol. 1989 Apr 5;206(3):465–474. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90494-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Estes J. E., Selden L. A., Kinosian H. J., Gershman L. C. Tightly-bound divalent cation of actin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1992 Jun;13(3):272–284. doi: 10.1007/BF01766455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frieden C., Lieberman D., Gilbert H. R. A fluorescent probe for conformational changes in skeletal muscle G-actin. J Biol Chem. 1980 Oct 10;255(19):8991–8993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frieden C., Patane K. Differences in G-actin containing bound ATP or ADP: the Mg2+-induced conformational change requires ATP. Biochemistry. 1985 Jul 16;24(15):4192–4196. doi: 10.1021/bi00336a056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Houk T. W., Jr, Ue K. The measurement of actin concentration in solution: a comparison of methods. Anal Biochem. 1974 Nov;62(1):66–74. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(74)90367-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huxley H. E., Stewart A., Sosa H., Irving T. X-ray diffraction measurements of the extensibility of actin and myosin filaments in contracting muscle. Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2411–2421. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80728-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Isambert H., Venier P., Maggs A. C., Fattoum A., Kassab R., Pantaloni D., Carlier M. F. Flexibility of actin filaments derived from thermal fluctuations. Effect of bound nucleotide, phalloidin, and muscle regulatory proteins. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 12;270(19):11437–11444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.19.11437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacobson G. R., Rosenbusch J. P. ATP binding to a protease-resistant core of actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2742–2746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kabsch W., Mannherz H. G., Suck D., Pai E. F., Holmes K. C. Atomic structure of the actin:DNase I complex. Nature. 1990 Sep 6;347(6288):37–44. doi: 10.1038/347037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim E., Motoki M., Seguro K., Muhlrad A., Reisler E. Conformational changes in subdomain 2 of G-actin: fluorescence probing by dansyl ethylenediamine attached to Gln-41. Biophys J. 1995 Nov;69(5):2024–2032. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80072-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kinosian H. J., Selden L. A., Estes J. E., Gershman L. C. Thermodynamics of actin polymerization; influence of the tightly bound divalent cation and nucleotide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Apr 8;1077(2):151–158. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(91)90052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kojima H., Ishijima A., Yanagida T. Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 20;91(26):12962–12966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Korn E. D. Actin polymerization and its regulation by proteins from nonmuscle cells. Physiol Rev. 1982 Apr;62(2):672–737. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1982.62.2.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kwon H., Hardwicke P. M., Collins J. H., Zhao X., Szent-Györgyi A. G. Myosin filament ATPase is enhanced by intramolecularly cross-linked actin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1994 Oct;15(5):555–562. doi: 10.1007/BF00121161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lorenz M., Popp D., Holmes K. C. Refinement of the F-actin model against X-ray fiber diffraction data by the use of a directed mutation algorithm. J Mol Biol. 1993 Dec 5;234(3):826–836. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Matsudaira P. Sequence from picomole quantities of proteins electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. J Biol Chem. 1987 Jul 25;262(21):10035–10038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McLaughlin P. J., Gooch J. T., Mannherz H. G., Weeds A. G. Structure of gelsolin segment 1-actin complex and the mechanism of filament severing. Nature. 1993 Aug 19;364(6439):685–692. doi: 10.1038/364685a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miki M., Kouyama T. Domain motion in actin observed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Biochemistry. 1994 Aug 23;33(33):10171–10177. doi: 10.1021/bi00199a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miki M., Wahl P., Auchet J. C. Fluorescence anisotropy of labelled F-actin. Influence of Ca2+ on the flexibility of F-actin. Biophys Chem. 1982 Oct;16(2):165–172. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(82)85019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mornet D., Ue K. Proteolysis and structure of skeletal muscle actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(12):3680–3684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.12.3680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mossakowska M., Moraczewska J., Khaitlina S., Strzelecka-Golaszewska H. Proteolytic removal of three C-terminal residues of actin alters the monomer-monomer interactions. Biochem J. 1993 Feb 1;289(Pt 3):897–902. doi: 10.1042/bj2890897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Muhlrad A., Cheung P., Phan B. C., Miller C., Reisler E. Dynamic properties of actin. Structural changes induced by beryllium fluoride. J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 22;269(16):11852–11858. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Méjean C., Hué H. K., Pons F., Roustan C., Benyamin Y. Cation binding sites on actin: a structural relationship between antigenic epitopes and cation exchange. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988 Apr 15;152(1):368–375. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(88)80723-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. O'Donoghue S. I., Miki M., dos Remedios C. G. Removing the two C-terminal residues of actin affects the filament structure. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1992 Feb 14;293(1):110–116. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90372-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oosawa F. Physical chemistry of actin: past, present and future. Biophys Chem. 1993 Aug;47(2):101–111. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(93)85028-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oosawa F. The flexibility of F-actin. Biophys Chem. 1980 Jun;11(3-4):443–446. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(80)87021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Orlova A., Egelman E. H. A conformational change in the actin subunit can change the flexibility of the actin filament. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jul 20;232(2):334–341. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Orlova A., Egelman E. H. Structural basis for the destabilization of F-actin by phosphate release following ATP hydrolysis. J Mol Biol. 1992 Oct 20;227(4):1043–1053. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90520-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Orlova A., Egelman E. H. Structural dynamics of F-actin: I. Changes in the C terminus. J Mol Biol. 1995 Feb 3;245(5):582–597. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Prochniewicz E., Yanagida T. Inhibition of sliding movement of F-actin by crosslinking emphasizes the role of actin structure in the mechanism of motility. J Mol Biol. 1990 Dec 5;216(3):761–772. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90397-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Salinovich O., Montelaro R. C. Reversible staining and peptide mapping of proteins transferred to nitrocellulose after separation by sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 1986 Aug 1;156(2):341–347. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90263-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schutt C. E., Lindberg U. Actin as the generator of tension during muscle contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):319–323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schutt C. E., Myslik J. C., Rozycki M. D., Goonesekere N. C., Lindberg U. The structure of crystalline profilin-beta-actin. Nature. 1993 Oct 28;365(6449):810–816. doi: 10.1038/365810a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schwyter D., Phillips M., Reisler E. Subtilisin-cleaved actin: polymerization and interaction with myosin subfragment 1. Biochemistry. 1989 Jul 11;28(14):5889–5895. doi: 10.1021/bi00440a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Selden L. A., Estes J. E., Gershman L. C. The tightly bound divalent cation regulates actin polymerization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1983 Oct 31;116(2):478–485. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(83)90548-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Selden L. A., Gershman L. C., Estes J. E. A kinetic comparison between Mg-actin and Ca-actin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1986 Jun;7(3):215–224. doi: 10.1007/BF01753554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Slósarek G., Heintz D., Kalbitzer H. R. Mobile segments in rabbit skeletal muscle F-actin detected by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. FEBS Lett. 1994 Sep 12;351(3):405–410. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00894-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Spudich J. A., Watt S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J Biol Chem. 1971 Aug 10;246(15):4866–4871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Strzelecka-Gołaszewska H., Moraczewska J., Khaitlina S. Y., Mossakowska M. Localization of the tightly bound divalent-cation-dependent and nucleotide-dependent conformation changes in G-actin using limited proteolytic digestion. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Feb 1;211(3):731–742. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Strzelecka-Gołaszewska H., Mossakowska M., Woźniak A., Moraczewska J., Nakayama H. Long-range conformational effects of proteolytic removal of the last three residues of actin. Biochem J. 1995 Apr 15;307(Pt 2):527–534. doi: 10.1042/bj3070527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tao T., Cho J. Fluorescence lifetime quenching studies on the accessibilities of actin sulfhydryl sites. Biochemistry. 1979 Jun 26;18(13):2759–2765. doi: 10.1021/bi00580a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tawada K., Wahl P., Auchet J. C. Study of actin and its interactions with heavy meromyosin and the regulatory proteins by the pulse fluorimetry in polarized light of a fluorescent probe attached to an actin cysteine. Eur J Biochem. 1978 Aug 1;88(2):411–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12463.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tirion M. M., ben-Avraham D., Lorenz M., Holmes K. C. Normal modes as refinement parameters for the F-actin model. Biophys J. 1995 Jan;68(1):5–12. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80156-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tirion M. M., ben-Avraham D. Normal mode analysis of G-actin. J Mol Biol. 1993 Mar 5;230(1):186–195. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vahdat A., Miller C., Phillips M., Muhlrad A., Reisler E. A novel 27/16 kDa form of subtilisin cleaved actin: structural and functional consequences of cleavage between Ser234 and Ser235. FEBS Lett. 1995 May 29;365(2-3):149–151. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00446-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wakabayashi K., Sugimoto Y., Tanaka H., Ueno Y., Takezawa Y., Amemiya Y. X-ray diffraction evidence for the extensibility of actin and myosin filaments during muscle contraction. Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2422–2435. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80729-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yanagida T., Nakase M., Nishiyama K., Oosawa F. Direct observation of motion of single F-actin filaments in the presence of myosin. Nature. 1984 Jan 5;307(5946):58–60. doi: 10.1038/307058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES