Abstract
Background
Benthic microbiomes exhibit remarkable temporal stability, contrasting with the dynamic, substrate-driven successions of bacterioplankton. Nonetheless, understanding their role in carbon cycling and interactions between these two microbial communities is limited due to the complexity of benthic microbiomes.
Results
Here, we used a long-reads (LRs) metagenomic approach to examine benthic microbiomes and compared them to the microbiomes in the overlaying water column and on particles, sampled at the same site and time off the island Heligoland in the North Sea. Although the diversity is vast in marine sediments, we recovered high quality metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs). Based on taxonomy and metabolic annotation of predicted proteins, benthic microbiomes are distinctly different from pelagic microbiomes. When comparing the 270 MAGs from free living and particle attached microbes from the water column to 115 MAGs from sediments only 2 MAGs affiliated to Acidimicrobiia and Desulfocapsaceae were shared at species level. Although, we recovered MAGs with the same taxonomic annotation in pelagic and benthic microbiomes, their metabolic potentials were different. A prominent example was the family Woeseiaceae that was among the most abundant taxa in the sediments. In benthic Woeseiaceae MAGs, we found polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs), predicted to target laminarin, alginate, and α-glucan. In contrast, pelagic Woeseiaceae MAGs were only recovered in the particle attached but not in the free-living fraction, and lacked PULs. They encoded a significantly more sulfatases and peptidases genes. Additionally, while genes involved in iron acquisition, gene regulation, and iron storage were widespread in Woeseiaceae MAGs, genes linked to dissimilatory iron reduction were mostly restricted to benthic Woeseiaceae, suggesting niche-specific adaptations to sediment redox conditions. Both, benthic and pelagic particle-attached Woeseiaceae MAGs encoded pilus TadA genes, which are essential for adhesion, colonization, and biofilm formation.
Conclusions
LR sequencing is currently the most valuable tool for analyzing highly diverse benthic microbiomes. The small overlap of MAGs from water column and sediments indicated a limited bentho-pelagic coupling. The data suggest that Woeseiaceae have habitat-specific metabolic specialization: while benthic Woeseiaceae possess the metabolic capabilities to utilize fresh organic compounds like laminarin derived from algae blooms, and to perform dissimilatory nitrate, nitrite and iron reduction for gain energy, particle attached Woeseiaceae from the water column may be specialized in degrading protein-rich and sulfated organic matter likely reflecting adaptation to the different types of organic matter and redox conditions in sediments vs. the water column.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40793-025-00732-3.
Keywords: Metagenomics, Sediment microbial communities, Helgoland, Polysaccharide utilization loci, Chemolithoautotrophy, Long-read sequencing
Introduction
Gaining insight into the ecological niches that allow the colonization, proliferation, and establishment of microbial communities in a given environment remains a fundamental challenge in microbial ecology [1]. A comprehensive understanding of the environmental conditions (abiotic factors), the biotic interactions among organisms, and the diverse microbial metabolic pathways are imperative to delineate microbial ecological niches. The niche theory has mainly gained significance in elucidating the adaptability of microorganisms within marine environments, specifically concerning their responses to seasonal variations [2], that for the most part, are driven by environmental factors, such as temperature, salinity [3, 4] and substrate availability [5–7]. Nonetheless, little is known about the metabolic differentiation of taxonomically related microorganisms living in marine sediments vs. in pelagic environments. The majority of studies addressed this question had been limited to 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing [8, 9].
While bacterioplankton exhibited considerable variability and dynamics in microbial populations, sediment-dwelling microbial communities demonstrate remarkable temporal stability [8, 10, 11]. For instance, in the North Sea, phytoplankton spring blooms have been shown to cause substrate-based successions of pelagic taxa such as Polaribacter, Roseobacter, Flavobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, SAR92 and archaeal populations [2, 6, 12–15]. In contrast, sediment communities exhibit a much higher stability even in the presence of strongly seasonal phytodetrital inputs, featuring dominant taxa like Woeseiaceae, Desulfobacterota, and Planctomycetota [8, 11].
Members of the Woeseiaceae family have been recognized as a significant component of the benthic microbial communities dominating in various settings, ranging from shallow-sea coastal sediments [16–21] to deep ocean seafloor [22–24], hydrothermal vent chimneys [25], marine solar salterns [26], as well as in both, oxic and anoxic environments [27]. Ecological and phylogenetic studies have described the Woeseiaceae family as a widely distributed group within the class Gammaproteobacteria, exhibiting significant prevalence in marine sediments worldwide [23]. Recently, Moncada and colleagues [21] showed that Woeseiaceae cells preferentially grow firmly attached to grains where they are most active compared to those living in the porewater or being loosely attached. Genome-based metabolic predictions, metagenomic and metatranscriptomics analyses indicated that species within the Woeseiales are habitat generalists [28] being metabolically versatile, encompassing facultative sulfur- and H2-based chemolithoautotrophy to obligate chemoorganotrophy [16, 23, 26, 29, 30]. The oxidation of sulfur and other reduced sulfur intermediates such as thiosulfate (S₂O₃²⁻) is mediated via the Sox pathway and likely linked to carbon fixation via the Calvin-Benson cycle [30]. Their chemoorganotrophic metabolism involved the utilization of mono- and polysaccharides along with proteolytic activity, suggesting a significant role in the degradation of protein-rich and sulfated organic matter, including remnants of cell membranes or cell walls [16, 23, 29]. Their metabolic versatility is particularly evident in their ability to switch between electron acceptors during oxic-anoxic transitions. In addition to the use of oxygen, Woeseiaceae species possess a truncated denitrification pathway and contribute to the release of N2O from sediments [23, 31]. These diverse metabolic pathways suggest substantial ecological diversification among Woeseiaceae species. Yet, due to limited cultivability and the lack of high-quality genome information, the genetic basis of their niche differentiation and its implications for organic matter recycling remain insufficiently understood.
Here, we applied a deep long-read (LR) metagenomic approach to explore the diversity and metabolic capabilities of the sediment microbial communities in the upper layers of oxic coastal sandy sediment samples from Helgoland on five sampling dates in 2018/2019. LR metagenomics offers the advantage of recovering full-length 16 S rRNA gene sequences, allowing accurate taxonomic analyses of the complete sediment microbial community [32]. Moreover, we compared sediment microbial diversity with those from the overlaying water column during the phytoplankton spring bloom, including free-living and particle-attached bacteria. The recovery of high-quality Woeseiaceae MAGs from sediments and overlaying water column samples allowed us to detect niche-specific metabolic capabilities at the species level.
Materials and methods
Study site and sampling
Samples were obtained by scientific divers from the Alfred Wegener Institute (Bremerhaven, Germany) using push cores at a shallow coastal site at Helgoland Roads, North Sea (German Bight; 54.182°N, 7.902°E) in 2018 and 2019. Water depths ranged over the tidal cycle between ∼ 6 and ∼ 8 m. The sediments are characterized by fine and medium sand with variable portions of coarse to very coarse sand (for details see [8, 11, 18]). We selected five surface (0–2 cm depth) sediment samples collected on March 7th 2018 (referring as sample Mar18), April 17th 2018 (Apr18), May 15th 2018 (May18), September 8th 2018 (Sep18) and January 18th 2019 (Jan19) for metagenomics analysis (Table 1). Surface seawater temperature ranged between 3.4 °C in winter to 19 °C in September. Salinity was measured between 33 and 34 PSU. The total organic carbon content was low with 0.07 wt % to 0.7 wt %. The highest chlorophyll a concentration was measured in September with 2.5 µg ml− 1 sediment (for details see Table S1). Furthermore, samples retrieved from the same site on March 17th, April 20th, and May 24th in 2016 as well as from site NoaH-B (53.987°N, 6.868°E), located about 80 km apart from Helgoland, North of the East Frisian Islands, were used for comparison. NoaH-B was sampled with a Van Veen grab during a cruise with RV Heincke (He417) at 28.6 m water depth [18].
Table 1.
Long-Read metagenomic statistics of Helgoland sediment samples
| Sample | Mar18_A1 | Mar18_A2 | Mar18_A3 | Mar18_A4 | Mar18_A5 | Apr18 | May18 | Sep18 | Jan19 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling day | 2018-03-07 | 2018-03-07 | 2018-03-07 | 2018-03-07 | 2018-03-07 | 2018-04-17 | 2018-05-15 | 2018-09-05 | 2019-01-18 |
| Metagenome size (Gbp) | 35 | 30 | 31 | 27 | 39 | 27 | 26 | 31 | 28 |
| No. reads | 3,153,305 | 3,706,560 | 3,298,344 | 3,434,288 | 3,065,523 | 2,569,567 | 2,692,975 | 3,390,715 | 3,115,280 |
| No. bps | 1.8 × 1010 | 1.5 × 1010 | 1.6 × 1010 | 1.4 × 1010 | 2.04 × 1010 | 1.43 × 1010 | 1.37 × 1010 | 1.64 × 1010 | 1.45 × 1010 |
| Average read length (bps) | 5,801 | 4,212 | 5,019 | 4,161 | 6,648 | 5,591 | 5,091 | 4,837 | 4,647 |
| No. 16 S rRNA sequences | 2,495 | 2,658 | 2,583 | 2,366 | 3,474 | 2,143 | 1,647 | 2,710 | 2,263 |
| No. OTUs | 831 | 835 | 819 | 815 | 976 | 783 | 635 | 802 | 716 |
| Dominance (D) | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Shannon (H) | 5.93 | 5.87 | 5.87 | 5.84 | 6.02 | 6.03 | 5.88 | 5.92 | 5.81 |
| Archaea fraction (OTUs) | 2.78% | 3.80% | 3.48% | 3.99% | 4.60% | 2.94% | 1.90% | 2.39% | 3.46% |
| Bacteria fraction (OTUs) | 78.76% | 74.56% | 76.12% | 74.72% | 79.87% | 91.09% | 87.47% | 94.19% | 93.33% |
| Eukaryotic fraction (OTUs) | 18.46% | 21.64% | 20.40% | 21.29% | 15.54% | 5.97% | 10.63% | 3.42% | 3.21% |
Metagenome analyses using PacBio long-reads
DNA was extracted from sediment samples (0–2 cm depth) according to Zhou et al. [33] with minor modifications [8, 11]. The extracted DNA was quantified using fluorometry (Quantus, Promega), and the quality was assessed using capillary electrophoresis (Agilent FEMTOpulse). Metagenomic libraries were prepared using the HiFi SMRTbell® Libraries from Ultra-Low DNA Input protocol. HiFi SMRT sequencing was done for 30 h on a Sequel IIe device at the Max Planck Genome Center in Cologne, Germany. DNA quantification, library preparation, and sequencing were performed following the manufacturers’ protocols. Ultra-low adapter trimming was performed using PacBio SMRT Link version 25.1.0, using default settings. Metagenomic LR quality was assessed using Nanoplot v1.39.0 [32]. Beta-diversity analysis was conducted using MASH distance (Mash v1.1 [35]), using default parameters. MASH distance values were visualized in an NMDS plot using the vegan library [36], and a PERMANOVA test using adonis2 method was applied to assess the statistical significance between sediment and water column samples. Taxonomic classification of metagenomic LRs was performed using Kaiju v1.6.3 [37] and Metabuli v1.0.5 [38], both executed with default parameters. Kaiju was used to identify eukaryotic metagenomic reads, while taxonomic classification of prokaryotic reads was performed using Metabuli.
16 S rRNA genes were extracted from metagenomic LRs using barrnap v0.9 (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap) and clustered in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 98.7% similarity (minimum threshold discriminating species suggested by Stackebrandt and Goebel (1994) [39]) using uclust v1.2.22 [40, 41]. Singleton and doubleton OTUs were removed from the analysis. Representative OTU sequences were imported into the non-redundant SILVA REF 138.1 database [42]. Sequences were aligned using the SINA v1.3.1 aligner [43] implemented in the ARB program package v6.0.6 [44]. Rarefaction analyses and alpha diversity indices were conducted using PAST v4.03 [45].
Metagenomic assembly and binning
Metagenomic assembly and binning were performed separately for each PacBio LR metagenome and as on co-assembled datasets to assess how sequencing effort influences the number of MAGs recovered from sediment samples. To this end, we employed two co-assembly strategies based on subsampling of the metagenomic dataset generated in this study (n = 9). In the first strategy, metagenomic files were concatenated in chronological order, starting with the five metagenome replicates from the Mar18 sample, followed by samples from Apr19 to Jan19. In the second strategy, all samples were first concatenated into a single dataset, from which reads were randomly subsampled to match the total data size (in Gbp) of the first strategy. Single and concatenated metagenomes were assembled with Flye v2.8.1 [46] using the options pacbio-hifi and meta. For each metagenomic dataset, the sequencing depth was calculated mapping long-reads using minimap2 v2.17 [47] with the map-hifi option and using the jgi_summarize_bam_contig_depths script from MetaBAT v2.2.15 [48]. Contigs larger than 2,000 bps were binned using MaxBin v2.2.7 [49] and MetaBAT v2.2.15 [48]. MAG completeness and contamination values were calculated using CheckM v1.1.6 [50] and CheckM2 v0.1.3 [51]. The quality for each MAG was estimated as the composite index ‘completeness– 5 x contamination’ of the CheckM v1.1.6, following established standards for genome quality assessment [13, 14, 31]. MAGs with a quality score ≥ 50% based on this metric were selected for further analysis. MAGs obtained from the co-assembly of all samples generated in this study (n = 9) were used for comparative analyses. dRep v3.2.2 was used to de-replicate MAGs in genomospecies (gspp) with the options -pa 0.96 (ANI threshold to form primary clusters) [52]. Gene prediction from LR metagenomes was conducted using Prodigal v2.6.3 [53], and representative gspp MAGs were selected for relative abundance estimation.
MAGs relative abundance estimation using PacBio long reads.
To measure the average number of universally conserved single-copy genes in the LRs metagenomes (i.e., genome equivalents), we used the script HMM.essential.rb (with the “metagenome” option) from enveomics collection [54]. Genome equivalents were calculated for each metagenomic dataset as the average number of genes predicted for each set of universally conserved single-copy genes. The sequencing depth for each MAG was estimated mapping the unassembled LRs using minimap2 v2.17 [47] with the map-hifi option, and filtering mapped LRs at ≥ 95% identity using the jgi_summarize_bam_contig_depths script from MetaBAT v2.2.15 [48]. These average sequencing depth values were normalized using the genome equivalents determined for each metagenome [32].
Metagenomes and MAGs recovery from water column metagenomes.
Microbial diversity and metabolic profiles of the water column samples collected during the 2018 Helgoland spring bloom were described in Wang et al., 2024 [55], from which the metagenomes and MAGs used for comparison in this study were obtained. The sampling dates were either identical to or within a few days of the sediment sampling. This slight discrepancy in timing can be considered negligible, given the high stability of the benthic microbial community composition observed throughout the one-year sampling period. All MAGs were dereplicated using dRep v3.2.2 [52] with a 96% ANI cut-off. To estimate MAG relative abundances, metagenomic reads were mapped against MAGs using the BLASTn option of the aligner Magic-BLAST + v2.12.0 with default settings [56]. Reads matching with higher than the 95% sequence identity and an (alignment length) / (query read length) greater than 0.9 were used to determine the sequencing depth for all representative MAGs in each metagenomic dataset. The resulting sequencing depth values were truncated to the middle 80% (TAD80) (i.e., the upper and lower 10% of outliers were removed) using a Python script from https://github.com/rotheconrad/00_in-situ_GeneCoverage [14, 57]. Finally, to estimate the relative abundance with respect to the abundance of bacterial and archaeal communities, each TAD80 value was normalized by the “genome equivalents” value estimated using MicrobeCensus v1.1.0 [30, 58].
MAGs phylogenetic classification
Phylogenetic analyses of MAGs were performed using the GTDB-tk v2.1.1 (release 207_v2) with the classify_wf pipeline [59]. The alignment of housekeeping proteins produced in GTDB-tk was used for phylogenetic tree reconstruction using IQ-TREE v1.6.12 [60]. Visualization and editing of the phylogenetic trees were conducted using iTol [61].
All 16 S rRNA genes were extracted from LR MAGs using barrnap v0.9 (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap). The sequences were imported into the latest updated Living Tree Project database (LTP_06_2022) containing all sequences of the type strains classified reported until June 2022 [62] and in the SILVA REF 138.1 database [42]. Sequences were aligned using SINA v1.3.1 [43] in ARB v6.0.6 [44], and manually checked to improve the alignment and to finally perform the phylogenetic analyses using ARB package v6.0.6 [44].
The ANI and fraction of genome shared between all MAGs was calculated using ani.rb [54] based on the BLASTn [63].
LR metagenomes and MAGs gene annotation and PUL prediction
Annotations of CAZymes of protein-coding genes predicted from LR metagenomes and MAGs were annotated using the dbCAN v10 database [64] and DIAMOND searches [65] against the CAZy database v04242021 (E-value ≤ 1e-20) [66]. Only genes positive against both dbCAN and the CAZY database were considered reliably annotated as CAZymes. SulfAtlas v2.3.1 [67] was used to annotate sulfatases using DIAMOND (E-value ≤1e-20). The MEROPS v12.4 database [68] was used to annotate peptidases using DIAMOND (E-value ≤1e-20). Moreover, predicted genes from MAGs were annotated using the SwissProt and TrEMBL databases (downloaded in September 2022 [69]) and DIAMOND v0.9.31 with default settings [65]. Also, proteins were annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database [70] and DRAM v1.0 (Distilled and Refined Annotation of Metabolism) [71]. TonB-dependent transporters (TBDTs) were predicted by HMMscan against TIGRFAM profiles TIGR01352, TIGR01776, TIGR01778, TIGR01779, TIGR01782, TIGR01783, TIGR01785, TIGR01786, TIGR02796, TIGR02797, TIGR02803, TIGR02804, TIGR02805, TIGR04056 and TIGR04057 (E-value ≤1E − 10). SusD genes were identified by HMMscan against the Pfam profiles PF12741, PF12771, PF14322, PF07980. Potential iron metabolisms were predicted using FeGenie v1.0 [72].
Results
Metagenome description and benthic microbial diversity
The long-read (LR) metagenomic approach covered the sampling period from March 7th, 2018 to January 18th, 2019, at five time points. For evaluating of the effect of sequencing depth, five replicates were sequenced from the initial sample (Mar18_A1 to A5). The average output for each metagenomic sample was 30.4 Gbp [interquartile range (IQR): 27–31 Gbp] and average read length of 5.1 kbp (IQR: 3.2–6.5 kbp) (Table 1 and S2). Thus, in this study a total of 274 Gb of LR PacBio HiFi sequencing data were generated. Beta diversity analysis based on k-mer distances revealed values ranging from 0.063 to 0.085 (on a scale from 0, indicating identical composition, to 1, indicating complete dissimilarity), underscoring the high similarity among sediment metagenomes (Fig. S1 and Table S3) [8]. The distance values among the Mar18 replicates were lower (average 0.067 ± 0.009) when compared with the other sampling points (average 0.08 ± 0.003). Based on the taxonomic affiliation of unassembled LRs, most of the sequenced metagenomic samples corresponded to bacterial sequences, and the proportion assigned to eukaryotes ranged between 6.3% and 6.9% (Table S2).
To obtain a broad overview of the community composition, we first exploited the recovery of full-length SSU rRNA gene sequences from all unassembled LRs. A total of 26,082 sequences (average 1,457 ± 143 bp length) were extracted from unassembled LRs, and after clustering the sequences at ≥ 98.7% identity, 1,732 OTUs were identified (Table 1). Of these, 1,618 were affiliated to Bacteria, 8 to Archaea, and 106 to Eukarya (Table S4). Despite the high sequencing effort, the non-saturated rarefaction curves of each metagenome individually indicated a low metagenomic community coverage of the bacterial populations (Fig. S2A). Nevertheless, rarefaction reached saturation by combining all metagenomes (Fig. S2B). The taxonomic classification of OTUs indicated that the most abundant classes were Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria (average relative abundance of 32 ± 2.6% and 18 ± 4.7%, respectively), followed by Bacteroidia (5.1 ± 1.3%), Planctomycetes (4.5 ± 0.5%), and Acidimicrobiia (4.3 ± 1.0%) (Fig. S3 and Table S5). At the OTU level, a new archaeal Candidatus Nitrosopumilus sp. was the most abundant species, comprising 3.8 ± 1.2% of the microbial community. Interestingly, within the class Gammaproteobacteria, the family Woeseiaceae comprised the most diverse family (represented by 50 OTUs) and reached a relative abundance of 7.6 ± 0.9%, similar to what was previously observed using 16 S rRNA sequence amplicons [8] (Table S6). In the replicated Mar18 samples, eukaryote OTUs accounted for 19.5 ± 2.5% of the total community, while in all other samples, less than 10.6% (Table 1 and S2). The most abundant Eukaryotes were assigned to copepods, the worm Monostilifera, and the animal parasite Acetosporea. At the class level, similar relative abundances for bacterial and archaeal groups were observed in all samples based on 16 S gene amplicons, full-length 16 S extracted from long-reads, and unassembled total metagenomic reads methodologies (Fig. S4). At the family and genus levels, the taxonomic distribution and relative abundance of bacterial and archaeal 16 S rRNA sequences in metagenomes were statistically similar to those previously observed using amplicon 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing [8] (Fig. S5).
Diversity and novelty in long-read derived metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) in sediments
Given the high similarity in the microbial diversity of the sediment samples and to assess the effect of sequencing effort in the representation of species in MAGs, we employed two co-assembly strategies. When we concatenated the metagenomic files chronologically, we observed a gradual increment in the number of recovered MAGs (Fig. S6). Starting with 8 MAGs from the initial single metagenome, we reached 75 MAGs after concatenating the five replicates from sample Mar18 (A1 to A5). We increased the number of recovered MAGs to 92 when the remaining four metagenomes (from Apr18 to Jan19) were included. Similarly, we observed a linear increase in MAGs when concatenating all samples and subsampling to match the Gbps size of the previous strategy. These results highlight the benefits of increasing the sequencing effort to recover MAGs in complex samples when using LR metagenomic approaches (Fig. S6).
All MAGs recovered using both concatenated metagenomic strategies (Table S7) were de-replicated at genomospecies (gspp) level using a 96% average nucleotide identity (ANI) threshold, resulting in the selection of 115 representative gspp MAGs (Table S8). Their genomic completeness ranged between 50% and 98.3% (average 79.2 ± 12%), and 99 encoded an almost complete 16 S rRNA gene sequence. A total of 23 gspp were identified as high-quality MAGs according to MIMAG standards (completeness ≥ 90% and contamination ≤ 5% [73]). The class-level taxonomic classification based on GTDB and SILVA agreed, and both indicated that MAGs were affiliated with the classes Gammaproteobacteria (n = 55), Alphaproteobacteria (n = 14), Acidimicrobiia (n = 17), Acidobacteriota class Thermoanaerobaculia (n = 5), Bacteroidia (n = 4), Planctomycetia (n = 3), Desulfobacteria (n = 3), Gemmatimonadetes (n = 3), Anaerolineae (n = 2), Nitrospinia (n = 2), Dehalococcoidia (n = 1), Cyanobacteriia (n = 1), Nitrospiria (n = 1), Phycisphaerae (n = 1), Entotheonellia (n = 1), Nitrososphaeria (n = 1) and Myxococcota (n = 1) (Table S8). The taxonomic classification of the recovered gspp revealed a significant level of novelty, as none of the 115 representative gspp MAGs could be classified at the species level using GTDB. Only five gspp could be assigned to known genera, including Bythopirellula, Breoghania, Pseudocolwellia, and Tateyamaria, and Nitrosopumilus, while 45 and 26 MAGs were affiliated with well-characterized families and orders, respectively (Table S8).
The combined relative abundance of all MAGs ranged from 7.4 to 11.4% of the total microbial community (in the Sep18 and Mar18_A4 samples, respectively) (Table S8) [Note that the relative abundance of gspp was estimated based on sequencing coverage; then, variations in genome size among not identified species cannot influence our estimations [32]. The observed relative abundances at class level were consistent with those detected using OTUs, with the Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Acidimicrobiia classes being the most abundant (Fig. S7). None of the MAGs independently reached a relative abundance > 0.82%, suggesting a lack of dominance by any single species (Table S8). Interestingly, the order Woeseiales, belonging to the Gammaproteobacteria class, was the most diverse (15 MAGs representing 8 genera and 2 families) and the most abundant in all metagenomes, averaging 1.3 ± 0.1%. Finally, the relative abundance of the only MAG belonging to the archaeum Nitrososphaeria was, on average, 0.3 ± 0.1%.
Water column microbial diversity compared to sediment
A comparison of sediment and water column LR metagenomes using k-mer-based distances (i.e., MASH) highlighted a statistically significant dissimilarity between the microbial communities and their metabolic gene content (Fig. 1), as supported by a PERMANOVA test (adonis2; R² = 0.615, F = 23.94, p = 0.001). This clear separation between the genetic potential of benthic and pelagic microbiomes was also observed when using taxonomic information for contigs (family and genus) and functional profiling depending on CAZymes, peptidases, and sulfatases (Fig. 1). Furthermore, an evident temporal stability was characteristic of sediment microbial communities in all dissimilarity-based analyses. In contrast, microbial populations in the water column were dynamic, as previously observed [55].
Fig. 1.
Relatedness between metagenomic samples from sediment (red) and water column (blue) using different approaches: (A) Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) analysis based on MASH-based distances; (B) NMDS using taxonomic classification of 16 S rRNA genes from raw reads based on OTU0.98; (C) NMDS using taxonomic classification of raw LRs at genus level; (D) NMDS analysis based on gene content encoding for sulfatases; (E) peptidases; (F) CAZymes
To determine the similarities and differences between sediment and water column microbiomes at the species level, we examined the composition of OTUs determined from 16 S rRNA sequences recovered from LR metagenomic datasets. Between March 19 and May 29 of 2018, we identified 993 and 621 OTUs in sediments and water column samples, respectively. When comparing all water column and sediment samples, we identified 276 OTUs shared between both fractions, but only nine OTUs were shared between all samples (Fig. S8).
During the same time frame but at the genomic level, 262 bacterial and 8 archaeal representative gspp (based on MAGs) were recovered from water column metagenomes. These genomes were recovered from three size fractions (0.2-3, 3–10, 10 + µm), thus representing a proxy for free-living and particle-attached fractions, and also the samples spanned different phases of the spring phytoplankton bloom, including an early diatom-dominated phase and a later phase dominated by haptophytes of the genus Phaeocystis (Table S9) [55]. The average genome completeness of the MAGs was 82 ± 1.75%, and according to MIMAG standards [73], 111 gspp were classified as high-quality MAGs. All recovered gspp represented for an average of 40.9 ± 6% of the total microbial population across the temporal series of the water column metagenomic dataset [55]. A phylogenetic reconstruction using all bacterial gspp from the sediment and water column revealed significant differences in microbial diversity between the two environments (Fig. 2). While Gammaproteobacteria species were recovered from both sediment and water column metagenomes, the order Woeseiales was more abundant in sediments and orders Pseudomonadales or SAR86 were predominant in the water column. Also, Alphaproteobacteria MAGs from sediments were predominantly assigned to Rhizobiales, while those from water column samples were related to Pelagibacterales. In water column metagenomes, the most diverse phylum was Bacteroidota (n = 85), particularly within the Flavobacteriales order (n = 69). In contrast, in sediments, only four MAGs were identified as Bacteroidota, two of which were affiliated with Cytophagales. Verrucomicrobiota and Patescibacteria were exclusively recovered from the water column.
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic reconstruction of the MAGs recovered from sediments and water column metagenomes in Helgoland. The maximum-likelihood tree and taxonomic classification were based on the conserved single-copy genes. Class and order names are indicated for MAGs recovered from sediment or water column metagenomic samples. Colored clades indicate the phylum, classes or orders indicated in the outer part of the phylogenetic tree. MAGs recovered from sediment (red) or water column (blue) samples are indicated in the external ring
Only two MAGs from sediments were identified at the species level in the water column metagenomes. The Desulf_03 MAG shared a 99.2% ANI with the Desulfocapsaceae MAG GCA_905479735, and the Acti_15 shared a 98.1% ANI with the Acidimicrobiia MAG GCA_905480055. We mapped the short metagenomic reads from water column samples on the sediment-recovered MAGs to further corroborate their presence in water column metagenomic samples. The sediment Desulf_03 MAG had 28x sequencing depth (TAD80) and a 99% sequencing breadth of coverage (i.e., the fraction of genome covered by metagenomic reads). The Acti_15 MAG only had ∼ 4.4x sequencing depth (TAD80) and 86% sequencing breadth of coverage. Interestingly, in the water column, both species were only identified in the particle-attached fractions metagenomes throughout the temporal series, with their maximum relative abundance observed in March and early April, coinciding with the pre- and initial stages of the spring algae bloom (Fig. S9). Acti_15 was more abundant in the sediment metagenomes than Desulf_03, with an average relative abundance of 0.12 ± 0.04% and 0.03 ± 0.01%, respectively (Table S8).
Organic matter degradation potential in water column vs. sediments
To explore the potential contribution of sediment microbial communities to the degradation of organic matter, we compared the carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) gene composition, including glycoside hydrolases (GH) as well as peptidases and sulfatases, among the representative MAGs from each gspp identified in both sediment and water column samples. On average, the fraction of genes encoding these polysaccharide degradation genes was lower in sediment MAGs than those from the water column (Fig. S10). Nonetheless, a higher fraction of GH and peptidase genes were encoded in sediment and water column samples for Bacteroidota and Gammaproteobacteria MAGs, respectively. High sulfatase gene content was characteristic of Planctomycetota from the water column and Bacteroidota in sediments. While water column populations associated to the spring blooms are characterized for carrying polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) [2, 6, 12, 14, 15], only 17/115 gspp recovered from sediments carried PULs or CAZyme clusters (Table S10). Here, we define a PUL as a genomic region of ∼ 10 genes, with at least four annotated as CAZymes, alongside transporters, SusCD genes, sulfatases, and/or peptidases in most cases. In sediments, the most commonly detected PULs were associated with the degradation of laminarin (n = 14), followed by alginate (n = 9) and α-glucan (n = 8). The majority of these PULs encoded in sediment MAGs were affiliated with the Woeseiaceae family (eleven MAGs; see below), Bacteroidia (three MAGs) and one Acidobacteriota (family Thermoanaerobaculia) MAG.
Microbial diversity of Woeseiaceae family
Based on the taxonomic classification of unassembled LRs using the Metabuli tool at the family level, Woeseiaceae emerged as one of the most abundant families in sediment samples, with an average relative abundance of 2.7 ± 0.3%, in contrast to a significantly lower average of 0.5 ± 0.6% in the water column (Fig. S11), corresponding to a Log2 fold-change > 2.5, highlighting a strong enrichment in sediments. Additionally, Woeseiaceae represented the most diverse family at species level in the Helgoland sediments, comprising 50 OTUs based on 16 S rRNA gene level and 14 MAGs, with an average completeness of 86 ± 9% and contamination of 2.7 ± 2%. Woeseiaceae MAGs encoded the largest number of PUL structures identified in the recovered benthic MAGs. We compared the phylogenetic context of the Woeseiaceae genomes recovered in the North Sea to those recovered from different sources (Fig. 3). At first glance, we found that members of different genera were specific to their source. For instance, species of the genera UBA1847 clade I, JAACFE01, UBA1844, JAACFB01, IDS-8 and Woeseia were retrieved from sediments, coral reefs or marine biofilms (marked in red, pink and green in Fig. 3, respectively). Contrastingly, species of genera UBA1847 clade II, SZUA-117, PBBK01, and SP4206 were predominantly recovered from water column samples (marked in blue in Fig. 3). Distinctions in genome size between MAGs recovered from sediments and water column were observed (Fig. S12), with sediment MAGs showing a larger genome size (average 3.1 ± 0.8 Mbp) compared to those from the water column (1.7 ± 0.7 Mbp).
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic reconstruction of the Woeseiaceae genomes using reference genomes, including MAGs recovered from sediment and water column metagenomes in Helgoland. Genomes marked in bold were retrieved from sediment and water column samples (this study), and others were obtained from NCBI and the Genome Taxonomy database. The colored squares indicate the source of each genome and MAG. The colored circles indicate the presence of laminarin (red dots), alpha-glucan (green), and alginate (blue) PULs. Genus-level classifications and corresponding codes were assigned based on the GTDB taxonomy
To further understand the ecological role of Woeseiaceae species in sediments, we compared the MAGs recovered from sediments to those recovered from the water column at the North Sea [55]. In the Helgoland sediments, the Woes_10 (affiliated with SZUA-117) and Woes_08 (JAACFB01) were the most abundant Woeseiaceae species with average relative abundance of 0.28 ± 0.11% and 0.23 ± 0.1%, respectively (Fig. S13). No Woeseiaceae species originating from sediments were detected in the overlaying water column metagenomes (detection based on read mapping, using a sequencing breadth of coverage cutoff of 20%). The pelagic Woeseiaceae MAGs Woes_01_WC (UBA1847 genus) and Woes_02_WC (SZUA-117 genus), were identified in the particle-attached fractions but not in the 0.2–3 μm fraction or sediment samples (based on sequencing depth and breadth; Fig. S14). These two water column MAGs had the highest relative abundance on March 19th in the 3–10 μm, and in April 12th in the 10 + µm fractions (Fig. S14). Thus, when examining all samples recovered from the North Sea, we consistently observed a distinct environmental (i.e., niche) specificity of Woeseiaceae species to either sediment or water column samples, which is reflected in their metabolic potential.
Metabolic potential of Woeseiaceae MAGs
Woeseiaceae heterotrophythroughpolysaccharide utilization loci (PUL) genes andpeptidases.
When examining Woeseiaceae genomes recovered from Helgoland and databases (NCBI and GTDB), Woeseiaceae genomes encoding PULs were identified only in sediment samples, as well as in particle-attached lifestyles such as marine biofilms and coral reefs (Fig. 3). PULs were not identified in the two Woeseiaceae species retrieved from the water column samples (Woes_01_WC and Woes_02_WC). For instance, most of the genomes encoding PULs targeting the degradation of laminarin, α-glucan, and alginate were clustered in the phylogenetic clade containing the genera UBA1847, JAACFE01, UBA1844, and JAACFB01. Moreover, Woeseiaceae MAGs obtained from sediment had a higher percentage of genes encoding for CAZymes and GHs when compared to MAGs recovered from the water column (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Fraction of genes encoding CAZymes, glycoside hydrolases (GH), sulfatases, and peptidases in Woeseiaceae MAGs according to their source. Box plots summarize the fraction of each Woeseiaceae MAG dedicated to different functional categories. Each point on the plot represents a single MAG and is colored blue or red according to a water column (WC) or sediment (S) origin, respectively. The asterisk denotes a statistically significant difference determined using the Wilcoxon test (p-value < 0.05)
We identified that ∼ 79% (11/14) of the recovered Woeseiaceae MAGs from Helgoland sediments encoded GHs commonly associated with laminarin PULs, such as GH3, GH16, GH17, GH149, GH13, GH158 and GT51, with seven of these PULs containing a single starch utilization system SusC gene (Fig. S15 and Table S11). It is important to note that these CAZy families are known to act on a variety of substrates beyond laminarin, such as other β-glucans, α-glucans, and related polysaccharides. Six Woeseiaceae MAGs encoded genes for α-glucan PULs, characterized by the presence of GH13, GH31, GH97 and GH77, with two PULs containing the SusC gene (Fig. S16). Additionally, six MAGs encoded for alginate PULs, all of them carrying the PL6 and PL7 genes and including the PL17 or PL29 genes, and five PULs encoding the SusC gene (Fig. S17).
MAGs belonging to the Gammaproteobacteria class recovered from both water column and sediments encoded the highest fraction of peptidase-encoding genes, in particular, MAGs from sediments belonging to the Woeseiales and Burkholderiales orders and the Pseudocolwellia genus (Enterobacterales order) (Fig. S10, Table S11 and S12). Additionally, Woeseiaceae MAGs retrieved from the water column had a greater proportion of sulfatases and peptidases, supporting the idea that benthic and pelagic species of this family are specialized to different substrate niches (Fig. 4).
Niche-specific Woeseiaceae metabolic patterns in different environmental systems
Woeseiaceae MAGs affiliated to SZUA-117 and UBA1847 clade II genera were retrieved from the water column and sediment in Helgoland metagenomes, and also from databases. Thus, we sought to examine the genetic components involved in niche-specific metabolic differentiation (Fig. 5). Although some general metabolic pathways such as the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation pathway were detected in all MAGs, source-specific metabolic pathways were also detected. For instance, the Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway was exclusively found in genomes from the UBA1847 genus recovered from sediments and marine biofilms. Similarly, genes associated with the electron transport complexes (ETC), such as the cytochrome c oxidase (cbb3-type) of the complex IV were encoded only in MAGs from sediment samples or marine biofilms. Incomplete denitrification pathways were detected in most genomes from sediments, carrying the genetic potential for the nitrate reductase NapAB (reduction of nitrate to nitrite), nitrite reductase NirS/NirK (reduction of nitrite to nitric oxide) and/or the nitric oxide reductase NorBC (reduction of nitric oxide to nitrous oxide). Rubisco (ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase large chain) required for carbon fixation via the pentose phosphate cycle, was identified only in the sediment MAG Woes_15 suggesting autotrophic metabolism for the minority of the Woeseiaceae MAGs recovered (Table S13). The genomic potential for oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds was only detected in sediment and marine biofilm genomes. In terms of phospholipid membrane transport, we observed that the nearly complete Mla (maintenance of outer membrane lipid asymmetry) pathway was predominantly present in genomes from sediment samples.
Fig. 5.
Summary of the metabolic potential for Woeseiaceae genomes and MAGs affiliated to genus SZUA-117 and UBA1847. The genomes and MAGs are organized based on their origin
Genes associated with iron acquisition, especially iron transport, iron gene regulation, and iron storage, were widespread across both water column and sediment-derived Woeseiaceae MAGs. Specifically, we detected genes encoding components of heme and ferrous iron transport systems including hmuV, fbpBC, feoABE, futA1, and yfeB. A diverse set of genes related to siderophore synthesis and transport was identified including fptX, fpvC, fpvD, fpvG, the permease fpvE, the substrate-binding protein hatD. In addition, both tonB-independent (lbtU) and tonB-dependent (pirA) siderophore receptors were detected, that are typically located in the outer membrane where they bind siderophore-iron complexes. Siderophore export systems were also represented by genes such as pvdR, pvdT, and the ATP-binding protein pvuD. Additionally, energy transduction systems critical for siderophore-mediated iron uptake, including exbB, exbD, and tonB were detected. In terms of iron gene regulation, the MAGs encoded for transcriptional repressors and regulators such as dtxR and fur, as well as fecR and siderophore-specific regulators like PchR (pyochelin regulator), PvdS, and YqjI (regulator for yqjH). Genes related to dissimilatory iron reduction, particularly those encoding outer membrane multiheme cytochromes, were predominantly found in sediment-derived Woeseiaceae MAGs. These included members of the genus UBA1847 and all MAGs recovered from Helgoland sediments (Fig. 5). Key genes involved in dissimilatory iron reduction included mtrA, mtrB and mtrC, suggesting a functional capacity for extracellular electron transfer to ferric iron. Also, MAGs encoded for genes involved in iron storage, including those encoding ferritin-like domains. Furthermore, most sediment MAGs exhibited a complete set of genes associated with flagellar assembly. The twitching motility genes (PilTIJU) were encoded in all Helgoland Woeseiaceae MAGs recovered from sediments and water column. The gene encoding for the tight adherence (TadA) pilus was identified in three MAGs retrieved from Helgoland sediments (Woes_01, Woes_07, and Woes_11), while it was absent in the Woeseiaceae MAGs obtained from the water column (Table S13). Overall, the comparative analysis of functional genes among Woeseiaceae MAGs retrieved from the water column and sediment indicated a better adaptation of sediment Woeseiaceae species to low-oxygen or anoxic conditions.
Distribution of Woeseiaceae species in North sea sediments
To determine the temporal prevalence of the Woeseiaceae gspp recovered in 2018, we examined their presence in Helgoland sediment metagenomes sampled in 2016 at two different depths. Out of the 15 Woeseiaceae gspp recovered using LR metagenomics,14 were detected in the superficial sediment layer (0.5 to 2 cm depth) samples from March and April, while all were present in the May sample. Additionally, 12 gspp were detected on a deeper sediment layer (5–6 cm). The Woes12 gspp was the most abundant across the time series and in the 5–6 cm sediment depth (Fig. S18). These results suggest a temporal stability of the Woeseiaceae species in Helgoland sediments.
Additionally, we evaluated the spatial distribution of the recovered Woeseiaceae gspp in other North Sea sediment samples collected at site Noah-B located North of the Frisian Islands (53.98ºN, 6.51ºE) (for details see [18]). These sediments are approximately 80 km from the Helgoland sampling location and were obtained from two depths (0–2 cm and 2–5 cm). In both sediment layers, Woes12 was detected as the most abundant Woeseiaceae species. Additionally, while Woes09 was identified in both layers, Woes15 was detected just in the superficial layer (Fig. S18). These results suggest a wider geographic distribution of three Woeseiaceae species in the North Sea.
Our team previously performed a time-series metagenomic examination of sandy surface sediments in Isfjorden (Svalbard) [11]. Although these metagenomic samples represent a broader temporal examination of cold sediments between December 2017 and April 2019, none of the Woeseiaceae MAGs recovered at Helgoland were detected in these Isfjorden sediment samples, further supporting the high diversity within this family.
Discussion
LRs sequencing considerations in sediment samples
The examination of the metagenomic data recovered here suggested that replicates sequenced from the same DNA and a different DNA extraction of the same sample had the lowest dissimilarity values (based on MASH distance and taxonomic profiles) compared to samples originating from different seasons. Furthermore, the comparison of dissimilarity values between sediment and water column samples, using various taxonomic and functional approaches, confirmed the high seasonal stability of coastal marine sediment microbiomes. Moreover, the LR metagenomic approach allowed the retrieval of an extensive collection of high-quality and full-length 16 S rRNA sequences from the benthic microbial community, which will facilitate further studies interested in designing FISH probes for microscopy-based identification. Despite the high diversity of benthic microbiomes, we could retrieve high-quality MAGs using long-read sequencing and co-assembly. Here, the approach benefited from a high sequencing effort, the temporal stability of microbial communities, and the co-assembly of metagenomic samples for studying complex microbial diversity [74]. The recovered MAGs represented approximately 7–11% of the total microbial community (i.e., the fraction of the reads mapping to the recovered MAGs). This relatively low recovery is primarily due to the high microbial diversity in sediment microbiomes, where many microbial species are present at low abundance, posing a significant challenge to modern sequencing technologies [32]. Nonetheless, the LR metagenomic approach used represents a leap forward for recovering medium to high-quality MAGs from complex environmental samples.
Temporal stability of sediment microbial communities and interaction with overlaying water column samples
We found a clear phylogenetic separation of MAGs recovered from the sediment and the water column. Together with the presence of specific metabolic pathways, the findings highlight an evolutionary imprint reflected in the genetic specializations and adaptations for bacterial populations recovered from sediments and the overlaying water column (Fig. 2). At the species level, only a small fraction of populations overlapped in the water column and sediment metagenomes (e.g., Acidimicrobiia Acti_15 and Desulfocapsaceae Desulf_03). We hypothesize that both species originated from the sediment and were subsequently upwelled into the water column, as they were exclusively identified in the particle-attached fractions (3–10 and 10 + µm) and not in the free-living fractions (0.2–3 μm). During spring, the water column is generally higher in turbidity compared to the bloom phase [75], suggesting the resuspension of sediments, and thus explaining the detection of sediment microbial species in the particle-attached water column samples. Moreover, based on the OTU analysis, we identified the archaeon C. Nitrosopumilus as the most dominant single species in sediments, likely missed in previous studies relying only on Bacteria domain-specific primers [8]. Members of the phylum Nitrososphaerota (formerly Thaumarchaeota) have been identified in oxic sediments in various marine environments, including shallow estuaries, open oceans and deep oceanic crust [77–79]. The microbial composition and temporal stability of benthic microbial assemblages in Helgoland sediment assessed here through deeply sequenced LRs metagenomes match the findings derived from amplicon 16 S rRNA gene sequencing and microscopy cell counts from the same samples [8]. This stability in benthic bacterial communities has been observed in other ecosystems, such as those in Svalbard (Arctic Ocean [11]) or on the island of Sylt (North Sea [80]). While the stability of species abundance is evident in sediments, particularly within the Woeseiaceae family, it is noteworthy that these organisms might exist in a latent state for an extended period of time, awaiting opportune conditions (both biotic and/or abiotic) to stimulate their metabolic activity and exploit their ecological niches.
Metabolic profiling and niche specialization of Woeseiaceae species in sediments and water column ecosystems
Woeseiaceae family members have been recognized as highly diverse and abundant microorganisms across sediment environments, including oxic surface coastal sediments, sublittoral, hydrothermal vent, and deep-sea locations [8, 16, 17, 23, 25, 26, 29, 30, 81]. In this study, we observed that all Woeseiaceae species were retrieved exclusively from marine environments, including pelagic environments, particle-attached fractions, or marine benthos, but not from freshwater environments. Despite their prevalence in marine sediments, their diversity and metabolic potential remain largely understudied. The metabolic analysis of the Woeseiaceae MAGs recovered here supports a chemolithotrophic potential based on the oxidation of hydrogen (presence of oxygen-tolerant [NiFe]-hydrogenase) and of reduced sulfur compounds (encoding SOX gene system) suggested before [23, 25–29]. Moreover, a Rubisco large chain in Woes_15 MAG suggests carbon fixation using the Calvin Benson cycle, also identified in MAG JSS_woes1 recovered from Janssand tidal sediment [29].
Members of the Woeseiaceae are mixotrophs. Their heterotrophy is linked to the utilization of polysaccharides and proteins. Here, we found numerous CAZyme genes organized in PULs and peptidases encoding genes [82]. Peptidase genes were enriched in Woeseiaceae MAGs from the water column, whereas sediment Woeseiaceae MAGs encoded a higher proportion of GH genes (Fig. 4). For example, Woeseia oceani has been previously defined through the large diversity of its peptidases, emphasizing their proteolytic potential [16, 23, 29]. The long-read sequencing approach allowed us to recover a PUL organization of CAZyme genes, transporters, and regulators often lost in highly fragmented MAGs recovered using short-read sediment metagenomes. Unlike the PULs frequently found in Bacteroidota [83], the PUL structures in Gammaproteobacteria were distinguished by the absence of the SusD gene [84]. The lack of typical PUL structures has also been observed in Verrucomicrobiota MAGs, which lack both SusCD genes [14]. Then, the sediment Woeseiaceae species encoded for PUL structures, which were not encoded in the water column Woeseiaceae MAGs, revealing their niche specialization for polysaccharide breakdown and distinguishing them from the water column species that feature more sulfatase and peptidase genes. Although the specific substrates available to water column Woeseiaceae remain unclear, our results suggest a higher protein content compared to sediments, which may explain the enrichment in peptidase and sulfatase genes in planktonic Woeseiaceae MAGs. In contrast, sediment Woeseiaceae MAGs encoded more glycoside hydrolases, possibly reflecting an adaptation to diverse and often partially degraded polysaccharides that circulate and partially accumulate in benthic environments, including laminarin from mainly benthic diatoms or more recalcitrant polysaccharides that reach the sediment after partial processing in the water column. Although PULs were present in the MAGs and the samples were collected a few days after the chlorophyll a peak in the water column and sediments during the phytoplankton spring bloom [8, 55], relative abundance of benthic Woeseiaceae did not increase. The stability suggests that other carbon sources than fresh material (e.g., laminarin), grazing, or viral lysis control the growth of the Woeseiaceae members.
The phylogenetic reconstruction indicated a differential representation of Woeseiaceae genera and species across environmental categories (Fig. 3). Most Woeseiaceae species seem attached to surfaces, such as sediment, biofilms, or particles. Species retrieved from pelagic environments were only affiliated with the genera UBA1847 clade II, SZUA-117, and SP4206, indicating an ecological niche specialization. This strong correlation between phylogenetic Woeseiales lineages and their source was previously observed by an analysis based on 16 S rRNA genes retrieved from the SILVA 128 database [23].
In the sediment and water column samples from Helgoland, we retrieved MAGs representing Woeseiaceae species affiliated with the UBA1847 clade II and SZUA-117 genera, and an evident metabolic divergence was observed depending on their source (Fig. 5). Most MAGs recovered from sediments encoded a complete or almost complete ED pathway, which was not detected in water-column MAGs. The ED pathway provides sediment Woeseiaceae species with a versatile metabolism for using glucose under oxic and/or anoxic conditions. Compared to Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway, the ED requires fewer enzymatic steps, enhancing metabolic efficiency and avoid the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under anoxic conditions [85, 86]. Moreover, the sediment MAGs encoded the high-affinity complex IV of the ETC, including the cytochrome c oxidase cbb3-type, indicating their potential to respire under low-oxygen or anoxic conditions, and also to perform nitrate/nitrite respiration, depending on prevailing environmental conditions [87]. Under anoxic or low-oxygen conditions, gram-negative bacteria such as Woeseiaceae may experience stress that could disrupt the lipid asymmetry of the outer membrane. We observed that the MAGs recovered from sediments encoded the Mla system, which helps restore and maintain this asymmetry by removing excess phospholipids from the outer membrane and transporting them back to the inner membrane [88].
Genes for iron acquisition, iron gene regulation systems, and iron storage were found in Woeseiaceae genomes across both, water column and sediment (Fig. 5) supporting that iron limitation is a common selective pressure in marine environments. The prevalence of siderophore transport and multiheme cytochromes, along with the presence of TonB-dependent receptors, indicates an active strategy for scavenging under iron-limiting conditions, an adaptation expected in both pelagic and benthic environments. In contrast, putative genes associated with dissimilatory iron reduction, such as genes for transmembrane electron transfer mtrCAB [72], were predominantly found in sediment-derived MAGs, particularly in members of UBA1847 and in all sediment MAGs from Helgoland. These findings suggest a niche-specific adaptation in sediment-dwelling bacteria, which often exploit insoluble iron or manganese oxides as electron acceptors under anoxic conditions [89, 90]. Recently, Karačić and colleagues [90] briefly reported also the potential for iron reduction in Woeseiaceae from biofilms on concrete in the Oslofjord subsea tunnel, based on the detection of mtrCAB. Another niche-specific adaptation in sediment-derived Woeseiaceae MAGs is the presence of flagella and the tight adherence (tad) pilus genes that may promote surface adhesion and enhance colonization and biofilm formation [91–93]. Moreover, all Woeseiaceae MAGs, whether from pelagic or benthic environments, encoded for twitching motility genes (type IV pili) that facilitate cell-cell and cell-surface adhesion [94].
Conclusions
Despite the challenges in assembling metagenomic reads from highly diverse samples such as sediments, the use of a co-assembly approach of LR metagenomes was successful for recovering high-quality MAGs. The approach benefited from the use of LR metagenomics, the high sequencing effort, and the temporal stability of microbial communities. Due to the high microbial diversity in marine sediments, even deep sequencing of whole sequencing runs per sample was not sufficient to cover the majority of the community. We only retrieved ∼ 600 to 900 OTU0.98 compared to several thousands of OTUs retrieved by amplicon sequencing [8]. Furthermore, only 11% of the metagenome was represented in the MAGs. Further increase in sequencing effort would help to increase coverage. Considering the high cost of sequencing required to recover high quality MAGs, however, a reasonable alternative would be to analyze microbial diversity and metabolism using raw reads. In this study, using unassembled reads and MAGs we observed characteristic genetic and taxonomic patterns in pelagic and benthic microbiomes.
Detailed comparison of pelagic and benthic microbiomes offered new insights into different lifestyles and substrates utilization. Specifically, Woeseiaceae could serve as a model clade to study adaptations and niche differentiation of taxonomically related benthic and pelagic microbiomes.
Both Woeseiaceae communities preferentially show an attached lifestyle, either firmly attached to sand grains or attached to particles in the water column. They differed, however, in their gene repertories for degradation of protein-rich and sulfated organic matter or algal derived polysaccharides, and also in iron reduction, highlighting niche-specific strategies for coping with iron availability [95]. Altogether, this approach revealed contrasting adaptations of taxonomically related species thriving in open waters and sediments.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Christoph Walcher, Markus Brand, Madlen Friedrich, and the team for sampling at Helgoland (Centre for Scientific Diving), Antje Wichels, and Eva-Maria Brodte for providing infrastructure at Alfred Wegener Institute Helgoland. Metagenomic sequencing was done at Max Planck Genome Center in Cologne (Germany), supervised by Bruno Huettel. We thank Isabella Wilkie for her helpful suggestions regarding the manuscript. Tomeu Viver acknowledges the “Margarita Salas” postdoctoral grant, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Universities, within the framework of Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, and funded by the European Union (NextGenerationEU), with the participation of the University of Balearic Islands (UIB).
Author contributions
L.H.O. and R.A. designed and supervised the project. L.H.O. and T.V. conceptualized the project. T.V. performed all data analysis. K.K. supervised and interpreted sediment and genomic data. All authors wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript, and approved the final version.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
The study was funded by the Max Planck Society.
Data availability
The metagenomes and MAGs generated in this study were deposited under the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) accession code PRJEB64856, and accession run codes from ERR11809028 to ERR11809036 (Table S1). The metagenomes and MAGs from the three water column fractions are available under the accession code PRJEB38290 [55]. The 16 S rRNA sequences recovered from PacBio raw reads dataset are available in doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25577322.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Tomeu Viver, Email: tomeu3@gmail.com.
Luis H. Orellana, Email: lorellan@mpi-bremen.de
References
- 1.Nemergut DR, Diana R, Steven K, O’Neill SP, Bilinski TM, Stanish LF, et al. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77:342–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chafee M, Fernàndez-Guerra A, Buttigieg PL, Gerdts G, Eren AM, Teeling H, et al. Recurrent patterns of microdiversity in a temperate coastal marine environment. ISME J. 2018;12:237–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lozupone CA, Knight R. Global patterns in bacterial diversity. PNAS. 2007;104:11436–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang Z, Juarez DL, Pan JF, Blinebry SK, Gronniger J, Clark JS, et al. Microbial communities across nearshore to offshore coastal transects are primarily shaped by distance and temperature. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:3862–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Becker S, Scheffel A, Polz MF, Hehemann JH. Accurate quantification of laminarin in marine organic matter with enzymes from marine microbes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e03389–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Avcı B, Krüger K, Fuchs BM, Teeling H, Amann RI. Polysaccharide niche partitioning of distinct Polaribacter clades during North sea spring algal blooms. ISME J. 2020;14:1369–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Giljan G, Brown S, Lloyd CC, Ghobrial S, Amann R, Arnosti C. Selfish bacteria are active throughout the water column of the ocean. ISME Comm. 2023;3:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miksch S, Meiners M, Meyerdierks A, Probandt D, Wegener G, Titschack J, et al. Bacterial communities in temperate and Polar coastal sands are seasonally stable. ISME Comm. 2021;1:29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lalzar M, Zvi-Kedem T, Kroin Y, Martinez S, Tchernov D, Meron D. Sediment microbiota as a proxy of environmental health: discovering inter-and intrakingdom dynamics along the Eastern mediterranean continental shelf. Microbiol Spect. 2023;11:e02242–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Overholt WA, Schwing P, Raz KM, Hastings D, Hollander DJ, Kostka JE. The core seafloor Microbiome in the Gulf of Mexico is remarkably consistent and shows evidence of recovery from disturbance caused by major oil spills. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:4316–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miksch S, Orellana LH, Oggerin de Orube M, Vidal-Melgosa S, Solanki V, Hehemann JH, et al. Taxonomic and functional stability overrules seasonality in Polar benthic microbiomes. ISME J. 2024;18:wrad005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Teeling H, Fuchs BM, Bennke CM, Krüger K, Chafee M, Kappelmann L, et al. Recurring patterns in bacterioplankton dynamics during coastal spring algae blooms. Elife. 2016;5:e11888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Orellana LH, Francis TB, Krüger K, Teeling H, Müller MC, Fuchs BM, et al. Niche differentiation among annually recurrent coastal marine group II Euryarchaeota. ISME J. 2019;13:3024–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Orellana LH, Francis TB, Ferraro M, Hehemann JH, Fuchs BM, Amann RI. Verrucomicrobiota are specialist consumers of sulfated Methyl Pentoses during diatom blooms. ISME J. 2022;16:630–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sidhu C, Kirstein IV, Meunier CL, Rick J, Fofonova V, Wiltshire KH, et al. Dissolved storage glycans shaped the community composition of abundant bacterioplankton clades during a North sea spring phytoplankton bloom. Microbiom. 2023;11:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Du ZJ, Wang ZJ, Zhao JX, Chen GJ. Woeseia oceani gen. Nov., sp. Nov., a chemoheterotrophic member of the order chromatiales, and proposal of Woeseiaceae fam. Nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:107–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dyksma S, Bischof K, Fuchs BM, Hoffmann K, Meier D, Meyerdierks A, et al. Ubiquitous Gammaproteobacteria dominate dark carbon fixation in coastal sediments. ISME J. 2016;10:1939–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Probandt D, Knittel K, Tegetmeyer HE, Ahmerkamp S, Holtappels M, Amann R. Permeability shapes bacterial communities in Sublittoral surface sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:1584–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guerrero A, Licea AF, Lizarraga-Partida ML. Metagenomic analysis among water masses and sediments from the Southern Gulf of Mexico. Front Mar Sci. 2022;9:1020136. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ferguson DK, Li C, Chakraborty A, Gittins DA, Fowler M, Webb J, et al. Multi-year seabed environmental baseline in deep-sea offshore oil prospective areas established using microbial biodiversity. Mar Poll Bull. 2023;194:115308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moncada C, Arnosti C, Brüwer JD, de Beer D, Amann R, Knittel K. Niche separation in bacterial communities and activities in porewater, loosely attached, and firmly attached fractions in permeable surface sediments. ISMEJ. 2024;18:wrae159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhou Z, Meng H, Gu W, Li J, Deng M, Gu JD. High-throughput sequencing reveals the main drivers of niche-differentiation of bacterial community in the surface sediments of the Northern South China sea. Mar Environ Resear. 2022;178:105641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hoffmann K, Bienhold C, Buttigieg PL, Knittel K, Laso-Pérez R, Rapp JZ, et al. Diversity and metabolism of woeseiales bacteria, global members of marine sediment communities. ISME J. 2020;14:1042–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bienhold C, Zinger L, Boetius A, Ramette A. Diversity and biogeography of bathyal and abyssal seafloor bacteria. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meier DV, Pjevac P, Bach W, Markert S, Schweder T, Jamieson J, et al. Microbial metal-sulfide oxidation in inactive hydrothermal vent chimneys suggested by metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:682–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lian FB, Zhou BJ, Zhou ZY, Rooney AP, Xu ZX, Du ZJ. Describing five new strains in the family Woeseiaceae and emended description of the order Woeseiales with genomic features related to environmental adaptation. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2025;48:126563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kessler AJ, Chen YJ, Waite DW, Hutchinson T, Koh S, Popa ME, et al. Bacterial fermentation and respiration processes are uncoupled in anoxic permeable sediments. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1014–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen YJ, Leung PM, Wood JL, Bay SK, Hugenholtz P, Kessler AJ, Shelley G, Waite DW, Franks AE, Cook PL, Greening C. Metabolic flexibility allows bacterial habitat generalists to become dominant in a frequently disturbed ecosystem. ISMEJ. 2021;15:2986–3004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mußmann M, Pjevac P, Krüger K, Dyksma S. Genomic repertoire of the Woeseiaceae/JTB255, cosmopolitan and abundant core members of microbial communities in marine sediments. ISME J. 2017;11:1276–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Buongiorno J, Sipes K, Wasmund K, Loy A, Lloyd KG. Woeseiales transcriptional response to shallow burial in Arctic Fjord surface sediment. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:0234839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hinger I, Pelikan C, Mußmann M. Role of the ubiquitous bacterial family Woeseiaceae for N2O production in marine sediments. Geophy Res Abstr. 2019;21.
- 32.Orellana LH, Krüger K, Sidhu C, Amann R. Comparing genomes recovered from time-series metagenomes using long-and short-read sequencing technologies. Microbiom. 2023;11:105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhou J, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:316–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.De Coster W, D’hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformat. 2018;34:2666–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, Koren S, et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance Estimation using MinHash. Genom Biol. 2016;17:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH, Oksanen MJ, et al. The vegan package. Comm. Ecol Pack. 2007;10:631–7. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Menzel P, Ng KL, Krogh A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat Comm. 2016;7:11257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim J, Steinegger M. Metabuli: sensitive and specific metagenomic classification via joint analysis of amino acid and DNA. Nat Meth. 2024;21:971–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1994;44:846–9. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinform. 2010;26:2460–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinform. 2011;27:2194–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucl Acid Res. 2012;41:D590–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pruesse E, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucl Acid Res. 2007;35:7188–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar A, et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucl Acid Res. 2004;32:1363–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. Paleontological statistics soft-ware package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4:9–18. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotech. 2019;37:540–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinform. 2018;34:3094–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive Binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wu YW, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated Binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinform. 2016;32:605–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Meth. 2023;20:1203–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rodriguez -RLM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints. 2016;e1900v1.
- 55.Wang FQ, Bartosik D, Sidhu C, Siebers R, Lu DC, Trautwein-Schult A, et al. Particle-attached bacteria act as gatekeepers in the decomposition of complex phytoplankton polysaccharides. Microbiom. 2024;12:1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Boratyn GM, Thierry-Mieg J, Thierry-Mieg D, Busby B, Madden TL. Magic-BLAST, an accurate RNA-seq aligner for long and short reads. BMC Bioinform. 2019;20:1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Conrad RE, Viver T, Gago JF, Hatt JK, Venter SN, Rossello-Mora R, et al. Toward quantifying the adaptive role of bacterial pangenomes during environmental perturbations. ISME J. 2022;16:1222–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nayfach S, Pollard KS. Average genome size Estimation improves comparative metagenomics and sheds light on the functional ecology of the human Microbiome. Genom Biol. 2015;16:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinform. 2020;36:1925–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucl Acid Res. 2019;47:W256–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ludwig W, Viver T, Westram R, Gago JF, Bustos-Caparros E, Knittel K, et al. Release LTP_12_2020, featuring a new ARB alignment and improved 16S rRNA tree for prokaryotic type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2021;44:126218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yin Y, Mao X, Yang J, Chen X, Mao F, Xu Y. DbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucl Acid Res. 2012;40:W445–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Buchfink B, Reuter K, Drost HG. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Meth. 2021;18:366–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucl Acid Res. 2014;42:D490–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Barbeyron T, Brillet-Guéguen L, Carré W, Carrière C, Caron C, Czjzek M, et al. Matching the diversity of sulfated biomolecules: creation of a classification database for sulfatases reflecting their substrate specificity. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0164846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rawlings ND, Waller M, Barrett AJ, Bateman A. MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucl Ac Resear. 2014;42:D503–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucl Acid Res. 2021;49:D480–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucl Acid Res. 2016;44:D457–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Shaffer M, Borton MA, McGivern BB, Zayed AA, La Rosa SL, Solden LM, et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of Microbiome function. Nucl Acid Res. 2020;48:8883–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Garber AI, Nealson KH, Okamoto A, McAllister SM, Chan CS, Barco RA, Merino N. FeGenie: a comprehensive tool for the identification of iron genes and iron gene neighborhoods in genome and metagenome assemblies. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:499513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, Reddy TBK, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotech. 2017;35:725–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Riley R, Bowers RM, Camargo AP, Campbell A, Egan R, Eloe-Fadrosh EA et al. Terabase-Scale coassembly of a tropical soil Microbiome. Microbiol Spect. 2023;e00200–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 75.Siebers R, Schultz D, Farza MS, Brauer A, Zühlke D, Mücke PA et al. Marine particle microbiomes during a spring diatom bloom contain active sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024;fiae037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 76.Francis CA, Roberts KJ, Beman JM, Santoro AE, Oakley BB. Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean. PNAS. 2005;102:14683–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Durbin AM, Teske A. Archaea in organic-lean and organic-rich marine subsurface sediments: an environmental gradient reflected in distinct phylogenetic lineages. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vuillemin A, Wankel SD, Coskun ÖK, Magritsch T, Vargas S, Estes ER, et al. Archaea dominate oxic subseafloor communities over multimillion-year time scales. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaaw4108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kerou M, Ponce-Toledo RI, Zhao R, Abby SS, Hirai M, Nomaki H, et al. Genomes of Thaumarchaeota from deep sea sediments reveal specific adaptations of three independently evolved lineages. ISME J. 2021;15:2792–808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Gobet A, Böer SI, Huse SM, Van Beusekom JE, Quince C, Sogin ML, et al. Diversity and dynamics of rare and of resident bacterial populations in coastal sands. ISME J. 2012;6:542–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chen YJ, Leung PM, Cook PL, Wong WW, Hutchinson T, Eate V, et al. Hydrodynamic disturbance controls microbial community assembly and biogeochemical processes in coastal sediments. ISME J. 2022;16:750–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hemsworth GR, Dejean G, Davies GJ, Brumer H. Learning from microbial strategies for polysaccharide degradation. Bioch Soc Transact. 2016;44:94–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Krüger K, Chafee M, Ben Francis T, Glavina del Rio T, Becher D, Schweder T, et al. In marine Bacteroidetes the bulk of glycan degradation during algae blooms is mediated by few clades using a restricted set of genes. ISME J. 2019;13:2800–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Francis B, Urich T, Mikolasch A, Teeling H, Amann R. North sea spring bloom-associated Gammaproteobacteria fill diverse heterotrophic niches. Environ Microbiom. 2021;16:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Spector MP, Metabolism. central (intermediary). Encyclopedia of Microbiology (Third Edition). Academic Press. 2009;242–264.
- 86.Klingner A, Bartsch A, Dogs M, Wagner-Döbler I, Jahn D, Simon M, et al. Large-Scale 13 C flux profiling reveals conservation of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway as a glycolytic strategy among marine bacteria that use glucose. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:2408–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Luque-Almagro VM, Gates AJ, Moreno-Vivián C, Ferguson SJ, Richardson DJ, Roldán MD. Bacterial nitrate assimilation: gene distribution and regulation. Biochem Soc Transact. 2011;39:1838–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hughes GW, Hall SC, Laxton CS, Sridhar P, Mahadi AH, Hatton C, et al. Evidence for phospholipid export from the bacterial inner membrane by the mla ABC transport system. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1692–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Shi L, Dong H, Reguera G, Beyenal H, Lu A, Liu J, et al. Extracellular electron transfer mechanisms between microorganisms and minerals. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:651–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Karačić S, Suarez C, Hagelia P, Persson F, Modin O, Martins PD, Wilén BM. Microbial acidification by N, S, Fe and Mn oxidation as a key mechanism for deterioration of subsea tunnel sprayed concrete. Scient Rep. 2024;14:22742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Colin R, Ni B, Laganenka L, Sourjik V. Multiple functions of flagellar motility and chemotaxis in bacterial physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2021;45:fuab038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Zhang M, He L, Qin J, Wang S, Tong M. Influence of flagella and their property on the initial attachment behaviors of bacteria onto plastics. Water Res. 2023;231:119656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Isaac A, Francis B, Amann RI, Amin SA. Tight adherence (Tad) Pilus genes indicate putative niche differentiation in phytoplankton bloom associated Rhodobacterales. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:718297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Marathe R, Meel C, Schmidt NC, Dewenter L, Kurre R, Greune L, et al. Bacterial twitching motility is coordinated by a two-dimensional tug-of-war with directional memory. Nat Comm. 2014;5:3759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Burdige DJ. The biogeochemistry of manganese and iron reduction in marine sediments. Earth-Sci Rev. 1993;35:249–84. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The metagenomes and MAGs generated in this study were deposited under the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) accession code PRJEB64856, and accession run codes from ERR11809028 to ERR11809036 (Table S1). The metagenomes and MAGs from the three water column fractions are available under the accession code PRJEB38290 [55]. The 16 S rRNA sequences recovered from PacBio raw reads dataset are available in doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25577322.





